Aside from those spurious science theories, we know little about the Sirius star system. Vague myths assert Atlantis ancestors may have had their original ancestral home in the region. How far back these origins stretch is largely left to the imagination of the investigator. Whether the Sirius marked on modern day star charts follows ancient locational knowledge is still up for debate. No one has ever visited the region. There are also valid concerns that undermine debate. For example, physicists presume astral depth follows linear perception when, in fact, existence at its most raw is devoid of time space or the supposed continuum because everything is flat packed (and can collapse down to nothing) behind the various realities (Ummo extra-terrestrials termed this dimension ten, “summary of everything”). Frequency algorithms (delivered by catalysing atoms) provide all mechanics of “what is” and certain entities that have facility to manipulate this knowledge can be anywhere or “any when” in an instant’s desire. That aside, over great distances measurement does not mirror known empirical conformity. Perhaps this is why Babylonian star charts look odd. If one was to make their notorious petrified depictions of our solar system the example, cosmologists would surely quip, “ignoring the anomalous extra body, positional order of planets is correct, but scale is completely wrong”. Yet, what if the Babylonians (or whoever advised them) recreated astral perspective? Putting that aside, when mathematical calculations are made pertaining to Babylonian wisdom, astrophysicists regularly marvel at their accuracy (some examples within one per centile of modern day figures). These scientists would do well to work on that inaccuracy.
Throughout my life, I’ve been a bit of a traveller. Respectively, over the years, I have visited many new places. Each and every one bore surprises for me. My expectations were, in some instances, exalted. Whether negatively or positively, sometimes I was overwhelmed and others I was less, but I never found any place fully matched expectations. No place was as the postcard depicts. Therefore, I am left to assume that venturing out into space would offer more of the same but “on steroids” as it were. In that respect, if Kathmandu doesn’t quite live up to the tour guide, how will Zeta Reticuli “reality” fare? Perhaps some of these strange geographies are going to be imaginatively inconceivable; realities so adrift of mundane 3D. Regards the astral region “in focus’, In effect all we can do is discern the word “Sirius”. Indeed, we cannot categorically determine whether the ancients revered Sirius as it is “known” today or even if our star charts are accurate enough to convey the location as it is. When Lemurian hosts took Sixto Paz Wells to Ganymede (a large moon off Jupiter), he had to be in altered state to experience that reality, which proposes certain planets, “barren” to the 3D eye, are teaming with life at higher astral frequencies (outside mundane perception). In addition, there is a clue in the name that suggests Sirius location may well be beyond our reality plane, but I will unravel more on that later. Down to fundamentals, astrophysicists measure brightness of light (and other calibrations) to gauge extreme distances in space. But their calculation data is inaccurate (some relational fields of light are incorrect or unknown) because stars produce many different types of resonance (i.e. standard spectrums do not match our “hi-jacked” black solar light benchmark). Suffice to say, realistic considerations about the Sirius region in general are still at the locational guesswork stage.
Though all carnal expressions should be tentatively regarded as labels (which will beg comprehension later in this essay), the name does exist and is unchanged from its presumed ancient Roman conception. Thus, any diligent student would find it necessary to seek additional insight that might improve hereditary analysis. Indeed, linguistic experts argue Latin script is a variation of earlier Greek, which itself is a very loose adaptation of Phoenician rune. The Phoenicians provided three (of twenty two) consonants devoted to voicing what makes the “S” sound today and one for “Z”. This is quite intriguing because it adds to the hereditary nature of the proposed analysis somewhat. Extra-terrestrial visitor Bek-ti (as referenced by Robert Morning Sky’s Terra Papers) reputedly revealed two raw vocalisations which stretch back to the dawn of time. Precisely how they were written or how alphabets have changed is unknown (and also marginally unimportant), so I refer only to “sounds” here. Predictably pronounced in the manner a snake hisses, Bek-ti’s primary word is expressed as “S” by Robert Morning Sky. Accordingly, it was used to donate the group that are sometimes termed “Anunaki”. Under these auspices they were the constructive “abusers” of the universe and, in that capacity, must regarded as uniform “Gods”. In relation, Bek-ti specifically advised, beyond conquest of territory, they only sought worshipers.
The other sound he revealed was “R”, which represents a guttural gurgle characteristically not dissimilar to a lion’s rolling roar. Translated it would mean “man”. Seeking parallels to validate Bek-ti’s conceptualisation, I find the Gnostic version of the creation of existence compares well. In that interpretation, God divides into slumbering male, active female and divine “all knowing” spirit (trinity). Female (Sophia), according to the story, created existence against the advice of the divine spirit (making her a theoretical abuser of equilibrium) which resulted in the design flaw (emphasised by the Fall of Satan) that allowed accidental physicality to manifest, collectively labelled “Adam” (but euphemised as “man”). Perhaps this is a contextual moot point, but the divine “male” corresponds with atomically physical female and vice-versa for divine “female”. Anyway (returning to Bet-ti’s explanation of things, whereby “S” relates to spirit and “R” body), It seems more than ironical to me that Sirius contains no less than three (fifty per cent of content) of these, two being “S” and one “R”. Personally, I do not buy into coincidences and suspect there must be more to that strange quirk of fate. Ancient ones tell me the universe is calculated from a carefully managed script (a different way of interpreting Ummo’s dimension ten, I guess) and, so far, their reasoning has proved impeccable. Nothing should be regarded as “arbitrary” even if popularised innuendo is determined to contradict premises. Because of the connective nature of the script that binds everything together; motives can conflict or confuse those that are not privy to the extent of everything or, better put, “big picture”.
Perhaps motivated by Einstein’s memorable comments reflecting fear of the quantum layer; instinct beckons primary analysis of [the true meaning of] Sirius should be “detailed”, approached “letter by letter”. Maybe efforts will prove futile, but failure to upturn the stones will equally guarantee secrets are sealed. Sirius has already been identified as an ancient Roman word, but was the legacy borrowed? I certainly wouldn’t put it past de facto Pharisee led Philistines. Later accounts defining Israel (and subordinate Abraham) will firmly identify plagiarism is their style. You can put a politician in blue clothes and pin a “democrat” badge on his lapel, but Republicans are instantly recognisable by their smell. Beyond succumbing to those tired propagandas, how can we distinctly ascertain whether Sirius is indeed an apex of the dawn of time? In this respect, the Romans may have voiced natural chimes that had been in circulation unchanged for billions of years. Should the letters of Sirius magically capture something beyond rational explanation, I’m afraid paradox will still only be justified by belief in results. Nevertheless, I shall endeavour to illuminate sanity as methodologically as possible. Will individual letters of Sirius cooperate to express something extraordinarily great? If so, the word will perhaps propose a “message in a bottle”.
Having gone through the process now, I can tell those ready to discern that all parts of Sirius play vital roles in the discovery of a subliminal record deeply hidden in plain sight. Unique consonants or vowels are specially selected and summarise as follow: “S” “I” “R” and “U”. We will learn “S” and “I” have been deliberately duplicated for potent effect. Work has already been done to correctly convey “Anunaki” (the Celts used a shortened version “nun” to represent curved ocean currents of space, which is sadly nominally mistranslated to mean primordial “creative” waters) connection to Bek-ti’s enigmatic “S”. Strategically aligned, “R” in primordial context stands for man which Gnosticism represented as “physical existence”. Now it is time to evaluate positional significance of the other parts. Insomuch “I” reflects a pillar (or support) but can be used to describe nations. When “doubled” each I signifies the boundary (or limit) of a nation, present between pillars as it were. On the subject of pillars, those remarkable Greek ruins that brandish characteristically ornate columns are in fact legacy of Atlantis and not plagiarising Philistines. It is no coincidence similar monuments are occasionally inexplicably uncovered at “random” seabed locations. Perhaps the best evidence for Atlantis is embroiled in the Pantheon (God extended), which was not originally used as a theatre. Instead it functioned as a temple. Profound “hymns” were sung by congregations at special tonal frequencies so as to draw communal energy from the Earth’s centrifugal heart for purposes of performing “miracles”. If we could mimic these precise frequencies, it would be possible to replicate the process today.
So taking I-R-I in positional context, there is a clear path to the “kingdom of man”. Nevertheless, to be over presumptive should always be regarded as sloppy. Is there another way to verify information? Certainly, concerning “R”, I do not consider Bek-ti attributed any relational connection to humankind. Rather, aside from that auspicious “Adam” metaphor, he loosely referred to the Anunaki split (emphatically recounted by Robert Morning Sky) which preceded the new “face of God” (carelessly mentioned in biblical Genesis). “R”, as used, I determine, was a different type of man; one that might best appraise to theoretical “God in person” (Elohim?). Core Anunaki are unable to-manifest (without available surrogate hosts). Hierarchically beneath them, Ba’al (from many meanings found in Sanskrit’s glossary, “Ba” best attributes water or baptismal purification of “Al” – almighty, in this case) operates at the highest spiritual level of manifestation, but the range of entities types that casually form within bandwidth might only be classed as proto-physical. Hence mere mortals cannot directly experience Ba’al unless in altered state. Though I find no confirming folklore, it seems to me that a significant portion of the Anunaki’s internal dispute (causing their irrevocable split) was driven by the partial desire to be physical. Sirian ancestors, under that premise, became the first living Gods (confirming Bek-ti’s suggestions). No wonder, even with significantly downgraded DNA, the Anunaki chose Sirians (by now an enemy) to act as their hosts, because they proposed perfect genetic alignment (or, at least, that was the sound theory). But of course, as I have outlined on many other occasions, it proved to be a wilfully disastrous experiment, perhaps highlighting how far apart each side of virgin Anunaki had become adrift of the other. Foul affairs didn’t alter progeny. Sirians remain descendants of the original Gods, so they are as close to “divine in physical form” (“R”) as is possible. Thus, in respect to my IRI inquiry, “Kingdom of Man” is justified, but might just as well transliterate as “Kingdom of God”.
So this newly discovered Kingdom of God is framed by S-U-S. Respective use of God doesn’t necessarily imply An, El or Al-mighty. Instead it probably substitutes a premium entity (normally grouped to facilitate spectral delineation that defines distinct traits of individuality) bestowed with God-like qualities or powers. “S” we already know signifies the Anunaki (double “S” verifies the hierarchical split, but there are other associated meanings). Though An (the Almighty) may truly perceive Anunaki figments as nothing more than sentient beings, their potent presence warrants greater respect from morals. It is reasonable to consider, for the Sirians (again, in context) their deep ancestors provide acumen that justifies belief in a metropolis of heavenly status (an essence external of but pertaining to existence if you will). They will always determine their own divine purpose is a direct attribution of oneness with their genetic cousins, regardless of past catastrophic attempts at repatriation and the subsequent bitter fall out. Thus a bridge (something akin to an olive branch) gleefully anticipates future revivification. Whilst it offers a rather dysfunctional shape, our “U” is that bridge. So to reiterate, “I-R-I-U” provides meat for an Anunaki (“S-S”) sandwich (producing potence that is omnipresent). Per this model, the Kingdom of God annexes a gateway (or drawbridge) to allow God’s return. That, letter by letter, is what Sirius means.
There is further evidence supporting the notion that Sirians are potentially divine. Of all spiritual entity types, they obsessively live by the laws of balance. Conversely, for instance, the wry might compellingly argue feline Lyrans (cheesy image is there for “effect”) are bestowed with the uncanny ability of “smelling” imbalance. When trouble brews, they are never too far away, but also rarely too close so as not to make a speedy getaway. Sirians strive to travel the path of virtue to attain enlightenment whereas Lyran modelled reptilians obsess over conspiracies that forever seek “agents of blame”. Humans are pitched between those two posts and perhaps that explains why our politics unravel a perpetual clash between wisdom and reaction. From all bureaucracies on Earth, undoubtedly the best place to witness this clash culture is Israel. Reasons are more than historic, but history can provide many clues as to how this is so. For instance, modern day Israel is one of the “reptilian hotspots” that has been identified by extra-terrestrial agents who supply exo-political personality Eva Draconis. Current Israelite affairs compare well as adjuncts to old colonialist standards and divining Hebrew industrialist despots remain spiritually inept in their ardour. The legacy that has been inherited doesn’t paint a particularly nicer picture. Today we witness a saga that provides perpetual victims from a Holocaust that rebellious engineering experts have proven must be phony. I say (please refer to my other website for more detail on this) that the Holocaust did happen, but it did not target or decimate any Hebrews. No, after Hitler’s “promise” (tucked away in Mein Kampf, a popular Hebrew read, I’m told), the WWII Allied bombings of Dresden, Hamburg and Frankfurt successfully caused a mini-Armageddon against Christian Slavic populations. There is much data backing theft of ideas and cultures under guise of Judaism, confirming this spiritual ineptness, and also “calculated” (let minions do our work) reptilian instinct.
They may well believe wilful plagiarism amounts to adjusted improvement according “progress”, but occasionally their coarse bluster is directly exposed. Myths supporting the premise Hebrew priests “forgot” how to pronounce the “true name of God” equally support the opinion that they never knew the real name of God to begin with. Their plunder of Babylon had actually inherited a vacuum of knowledge which is subtly preserved by ignorance. Yet, as pillage is their way, is it not worthy to consider whether reflective motive embroiled in the “creation” of Israel was equally maligned? If Israel had contextually existed for all time, then confusion as to the basis would surely permit possibility for a veil concealing pungent plagiarism? We should be all too aware (in the karmic sense) of how the slippery hand of the ambitious zealot operates. Suffice to say, that creed would have no compunction but to grab everything they could after the rightful owners of “useful” heritage had disappeared. But in specific regards to Israel, logic dictates there is a rather obvious Achilles heel that obstructs zealous tribute. Isis is clearly a more modern concept than many would care to consider and zealots hinge everything on the “interplay” between Ra and Isis (emphasised by their Persian Passover atrocity – biblical Egypt presented a metaphor). Originally Isis consisted of one simple syllable. Synonymous with later translations, two distinct pronunciations (“Is” vocalised either as “ayz” or “iss”) were combined to make the dual syllable word “!s-is”. Sadly, I do not have enough “reference points” (inherence delivers information in such out-of-context parcels) to discern which meaning relates to which sound with certainty, but differences are as follows. I suppose “Ayz” conveys “soulful intent” and “Iss” is the inherited “void of darkness”, but it could be the other way round. There can be no doubt that if Israel was created much earlier than is commonly believed; Isis would not have existed per se. That is how our zealots Achilles heel is significantly unmasked. Had Ra and El and Isis in combination been a Hebrew invention, their respective nation would be called Isisrael. But why on Earth would they choose to embezzle a silly word and make such a big fuss of it?
There is, of course, another problem attached to the whole affair. Though Babylonian politics surrounding Ra and Isis are compelling, they don’t make a great deal of conjectural sense when factoring in El, which we now know is Almighty God or An (note, I wonder if An/El/Al were different branches of a much earlier genre version). Ra, taking position as God’s spiritual portal, works well in combination with El (“father of existence”). My initial thoughts pertaining to analysis of Israel repeatedly visualised the Buddhist yin yang effect for some unfathomable reason. Then it occurred to me, after I explored conceptualisation further, that if one was to take the enclosed circle (a comparable feature of the Anunaki Cross) as representing “El”, a serpentine path (“S”) etching “fate” is accidentally formed by light and dark. Light is obviously personified by Ra, but Isis is much more than darkness unless the “Iss” (void of space) interpretation takes associative precedence. To convey clarity of meaning, “Is” (rather than Isis) is the most apt terminology. The plot, though, becomes rather thicker upon deeper investigation into Israelite tradition. Did our slippery Zealots know precisely what they had plundered?
But there is more to this saga than the invention of Israel. After Adam, the most revered “man” who ever lived was Abraham and that fact is celebrated by all practicing Jews. Perhaps we need more background on Adam (who, Gnostics inform us, goes many names, including Yaldebroath) to fully appreciate premises, Suffice to say, if Adam came first, could he represent physical or “black” existence (there are two distinct complimenting reality dimension bandwidths and humanity is on the cusp of ascension to the higher one) in its entirety? According to the Gnostic preserved accounts, this is the truth for he was brought to life by and became the cherished son of Sophia (female aspect of God) while God slumbered. Thus, Adam, in the strictest terms, is Isis. Now, truth revealed, here it starts to become interesting. The biblical account of Genesis categorical states that Abraham was a man who sacrificed (destroyed?) his first born son (– implying that son was Adam who also represents atomic existence) for God (colonialist imposter?), which kick started the “nation of Israel”.
He, supplemented by those conditions, is the paternal father of the Hebrews. However, I question the validity of the biblical account unless it was expressive metaphor. Given my accompanying suggestions (highlighted in brackets), the truth supporting unaltered meaning is alarming, to say the least. Perhaps it is worth investigating ancient word stems that collectively attribute Ab-Ra-Ham. Maybe they will précis affirming those disturbing subliminal messages preserved in the Genesis text, or conversely we might discover something else. Let us put diligence to the test. And it seems fitting to start with Hebrew language as it is their legacy. So Hebrew “Ab” in the biblical translation equates to “father” in English. Whilst I haven’t found parallels in other tongues (intriguingly “Ba” is bad father in Sanskrit), inherence confirms it stems from a [forsaken] ancient Atlantis dialect. “Ra” has already been evaluated in position in Israel, so I will move swiftly on with my analysis of “Ham”, which is an expression that does appear in Sanskrit’s glossary. Values are quite decisive in this instance. Ham correspondingly means either aether or void of darkness. Where have we heard that before?
Abraham wasn’t the father of Israel. He is Israel, disguised only by that rebranding of terminology, “Ab” doubles as “El”, “Ra” is in correct position and “Ham” reflects Is to complete a mirror image (order reversed). In spiritual terms, the mirror brings truth to life, so Abraham is both metaphor and pun. He marked the beginning of national independence and this has tragically envisaged tyrannical Zionism (such is the determination to impose “peace” on the World). Nevertheless, guaranteed authenticity of naming conventions can be hard to justify given the apparently arbitrary nature of words. For instance, planet Uranus was only “discovered” by modern man in 1781 yet the name is a very ancient one which testifies more than is obvious to the casual eye. In this specific case, it can be broken into different resolving “Atlantis style” components. Let me demonstrate what I mean by that. U-Ra-Nus (as alliterated) disbanded would translate to “domain that conforms to the spiritual essence of God”. Yet if we commute values differently, sceptics would be surprised to learn that parts combining as Ur-An-Us covert as “resting place that provides afterlife for God’s deceased spirits” (i.e. spirit “heaven”). That accordingly more or less places both translations in synch.
In fact, generally speaking, names of every heavenly body with histories predating our modern era provide clues as to deep understand of the formularisation of existence. Ve-nus perhaps makes an exception to the rule (although I will contradict this rough explanation at the conclusion of this essay). From Sanskrit, we discover “dangling fertility” (bait) or temptress assures Venus is shielded by prosperity. There is further, more subtle, evidence. Plural of the Greek word for “stars” is ast-ra (aster singular). Ra provides the spiritual component of all stars, this suffix positioning is correct in the plural (and would be misrepresentative in the singular), but did the Greeks know this? Hebrew word El-o-him (God-beings) has no singular context, because it highlights the omnipresence of almighty and hints at how raw spirituality spawns. Even so, the most salient point I am trying to make here is that “Ra” symbolises higher authority than individual stars and our deep ancestors either knew that or parroted knowledge they did not fully appreciate. Putting “Ra” to the test, one would expect the value to significantly feature in generic origins of star. Consequentially, Sanskrit, most ancient of all languages and closest to Atlantis script, represents star as Ta-Ra-Ka (from Hindi). In fact, other related Hindu words (such as Ta-Ra, Si-Ta-Ra and Nak-Shat-Ra symbolism) provision for essential Ra as well. We can learn so much from the ancients pertaining to the precise point and purpose of the universe. But, of course, generations of obsessive zealots have stealthily and deliberately censored the record in order to reduce it to gibber. Over millennia, the many and frequent changes have had the effect of bleaching consistent truth. Legacies are the mockeries that are religions, which has ensured mankind is permanently confused and will remain that way without a catalyst. For the zealots conditioning of the many has proved extremely bountiful. Mass slaves are rendered so acutely susceptible; they are almost oblivious to their tyrannical whims.
Distortion of truth perhaps always was geared towards destroying spiritual validity. True spiritual connection can only be achieved through communion. That is why Avalon based Gnostic Druids (quite different from the frilly “New Age” order established by an imposter in the eighteenth century) are mocked. Stone Henge, once used by the imposters as a feeble place of worship, had actually functioned as a Pteroid (another plausible “R” contender) congregation point (beginnings of sacred sanctuary tradition) millions of years before the monument is “said to have been” created. But, returning to spiritual validity or rite, initially, individuals must earn their passage to literally evolve or configure to “find self” in preparation for essential integration with “other” (true communion). Now zealots dictate terms as to acceptable “limits of man” and there is no permissible self-discovery tour (beyond those boundaries). Complimenting religions pompously instruct profane morality issued by some vaporous, hostile authority in the expectation followers will bow down before this precarious wisdom unruffled. Prior to distortion, Sirians were transparent in their efforts at progressing illumination, although it should be noted that those that aren’t ready for wisdom were not provided the mechanics to see. They may be domineering and (sometimes) uncompromising, but Sirians will not overtly deceive. Even without assistance, it should be patently obvious that attainment of communal partnership can only be reached by members who have “found” true self (devoid of corruption). Suffice to say, it takes but one weak link for collaboration of engagement to disintegrate into “contest”. Contest, of course, is the primary step towards outright conflict or “war”. Welcome to planet Earth. Given that background, it is easy to appreciate why genetic heritage used to be so prized. Progeny wasn’t about status, although those with pedigree sometimes came with certain unique abilities distinctly separating them from other. Genetic integrity has been more or less squandered (even with strict elite marriage policy), so now just about all conceivable tracks have been buried. Unsurprisingly, consequences have bubbled up sporadic prodigies to no set agenda, but this “phenomenon” has vainly been attributed as “evidence” to support notional “Darwinist” arbitrary nature of procreation, which is the great lie. Did it make “Mein Kampf”, I wonder? Now, there is one natural “hereditary” prodigy exception. Yes, “facts” are widely promoted by those determined to justify Jewish superiority per their “chosen” status. It seems they have been validated by music.
Ancients knew the truth behind divine evolution of genetic tracks and certain Gnostic texts cautiously philosophise over the subject. In my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” I remark on the vital importance of Anunaki bloodlines (remembering any “life force” is alien to the body, highlighting the critical nature of finding true self) in relation to how we develop towards ascension. Converting precise hierarchical structures down to man, I have listed root genealogies many times before (in prior published essays/articles). Per that outline, hu-man (hyphenated deliberately) is either version three or version four of Anunaki man depending on interpretation of “order” (and “man”, I guess). For instance, dragons (genetic licensees) record Tyrannosaurus Rex as first Earth man. Following the destruction of Maldek (which provoked a hyper-evolutionary downscale of the large dinosaurs due to significant change to Earth’s orbital cycle), the T-Rex form was lost and man was no more. In the range of 30-50 million years ago a new intelligent biped was created to fill the void and this is known as Pteroid today by the privileged few. A strange looking character, various Pterodactyl types are its legacy (satisfying 3D reality). Pteroid had spiritually ascended with such verve, by around 5 million years ago (I cannot give a more precise figure) it was on the cusp of blinking out of the then reality plane. Thus, in accordance with wishes of an intergalactic consortium, a partially alien man was created (“visage” modelled on T-Rex) to take over. Tabloid journalists that “deal with esoteric matters” tend to refer to the wider group of new man as “reptilians” (even though they predominantly comprise of Sirian/feline gene stock).
Liturgy of our relationship [beneath the hierarchy] is sadly not that apparently simple. Hu-man comprises various batches of similarly aligned (some almost identical) hybrids. Our pedestrian Genome Project can only perceive minute differences separating the various “brackets”, but ones with access to holistic DNA (located in the quantum layer) could present a much more complete (and varied) picture. Celtic God Hu-Gadam (or Hu God as far as I’m aware) is our indirect creator (or rather, DNA licensee), hence the reason for that enigmatic “hu” prefix. Following this account, Pteroid (acting Hu Gadam) assumed the Satyr form. Whether transformation was a symptom of spiritual ascension is open to debate. Reptilians produced our early batches while God was away (i.e. without Pteroid authorisation, which also hints at his ascension) and they took the unprecedented steps of combining previously unused Sirian DNA (coded as “tree of knowledge” in biblical Genesis?) in batch production. Creation of the cerebral cortex is the remarkable legacy and we are the only creature known to have inherited it. But this also marks an exceptionally important sundry point because obvious human-Sirian “dual generic heritage” is brusquely exposed in our being (not as apparent in reptilians). Along the Sirian line, we represent core genetic version seven. Before I mentioned we are either type three or four Anunaki man. To the purist, T-Rex was a design made obsolete and, although certain genetic facets were used to create reptilian man, Pteroid is the closest spiritual link to the Anunaki. Reptilian man would become unlicensed geneticists whereas, to the best of my knowledge, T-Rex was nothing more than a very intelligent creature, falling short of essential spiritual being.
Prior to creation of “physical” man, genetic progeny was generally perceived in spiritual terms (adrift of physicality). At the very top of the proverbial ladder, the same group called “Anunaki” I keep referring to are, relative to physicality, permanently non-manifest. They needed an outlet for expression and, after deep contemplation, imagined “Ba-al” (which means baptised or, better still, “prepared” God) into being. Manifestation comprised a group of entities with unique characteristics, enough to represent essential Anunaki variance. However I need to qualify, use of manifestation here is partially symbolic. The Ba’al collective is located in the highest spiritual realms, too far displaced from mundane reality to connect with our physicality. A bridge linking physical reality (allowing Ba’al and Anunaki quasi-presence) was forged when dragons were brought into being to represent “hierarchical” interests, notably preservation of genetic heritage. Human is one element of that heritage and dragons (possibly biblical angels), in that respect, were (prior to their ascension) the highest physical outlet to God. If human was not a spiritual being, there would have to be exceptional reasons to permit our genetic preservation. Thus, to dispel any confusion, it is vital that what is meant by spiritual here persuades comprehension. At its very baseline, anything spiritual must reflect the will of God. This might conflict with interests of self, so selfish behaviour should instinctively be regarded as probably obstructing spiritual purpose. To fortify [the fact], beasts of most grotesque appearance and savage behaviours, whilst empowering the will of God, are spiritual. By extension, there are no formally accountable laws that might précis spirituality. There exist only situation relevant senses of what is right and what is wrong in relation to life purpose.
Great spiritual pretenders will perennially test vanity, of course. The rather more problematical question is, “can the Gods behave vainly too?” Highlighted by a website visitor here a few years ago, we were categorically advised the Anunaki are “rogue time lords who parasite off infected domains”. Before jumping to any set conclusions on this information, it would be advisable to first apply due diligence as best we can. For instance, what if that warning “by itself” turned out to be bogus; perhaps an extension of a malicious slander campaign directed by parties unknown (who, by rote, we might ascertain, are Anunaki bitter opponents)? I have written extensively about the tenuous partnership between Sephardim (reptilian overlords and Anunaki, which plays out more as a battle between foes. In that respect, without doubt, messages from my website visitor did show Sephardic hallmarks. However, information was also demonstrative and “explicit”, which places uncertainty over ownership. Reptilians prefer to communicate with innuendo, proverb, cryptic analogy or metaphor (some I have witnessed have been so obscure, they have taken me years to effectively decode). Therefore, in denial of the Sephardim, it seems to me the most likely source for data is the Jupiter located Lemurians (I exampled their connection with Peruvian Sixto Paz Wells earlier). Even so, due diligence implores, how can this Lemurian wisdom be verified? Well, first off, Anunaki is not the correct name for God. Israelite “propagandist” Zechariah Sitchin broke the Babylonian terminology into two words “Anu” “Naki”, which he claimed referred to God (Anu) coming down from the heavens.
Though the analysis fits in well with the tradition of great meteorology deities such as Celtic Beelzebub and Roman Zeus, the true Almighty does not need to conquer that which is part of “himself”. Sitchin, at best, probably identified an outrageous insubordinate (though later in this assay I will offer alternatives). True God is Annunaki and naming conventions combine three distinct values. “An” is the almighty, the whole, the presiding effervescent force. “Nun” (preserved in Celtic script), I repeat, stands for primordial darkness comprising infinite oceans of space that are building blocks of existence. Aki (ironically found in modern day Japanese) is the unquenchable, dazzling light which is graded (Gnostics identify as states) spiritual vitality and sum of all knowledge (logos). Perceptive visitors will notice that my descriptive outline is very similar to sketches I made of “Israel” and “Abraham” earlier. So much so, I believe all three are different versions of a solitary information source which may have been deliberately distorted over the ages, but I will do my best to explain premises. Why would Anunaki be given the same name as God unless some (deceptive) agency was determined to confuse “believers” into believing imposters were the extent of magnificence?
Could identical philosophy be attributed to Israel and Abraham?
If we consider Israel in particular, there are some very odd distortions at play. According to ancient maps, the territory occupied a small strip of land alongside Judea. Then, Jews were peoples of Judea and not (necessarily) Israel. Later conceptual land demarcation was to change, and change, and change again. With all these changes came confusion. Israelites, for instance, are the only people on this planet that do not require a nation to be nationals (goyim). That is possibly why orthodox purists prefer a state of constant limbo. In a sense, to be a national without a nation is to be free. Those bound to nations are reflective slaves. Consequentially, some Jews choose not to return to their homeland. Doubtlessly ambiguity over where authentic Israel is located aids decision making. There is also the enigma as to why the Jews (in particular) have been [supposedly] selected “by God” as His chosen people. After monstrous Jericho, given their poor record in areas of humanitarianism and world affairs, evidence seems to defy this “chosen” status. Even so trappings of honour assure they have a dedicated “Promised Land” which doubles as their ancestral homeland. Uncertainty over the original location of Israel pales to insignificance when considering the challenge of sourcing a valid route to the Promised Land.
Inconsistent theories as to the whereabouts are as numerous as wails (and teeth gnashing?) from sceptics. Nevertheless the matter becomes graver when applying supposing logic. Why would there be an Apartheid separating proverbial Israel from the Promised Land? The two must be identical twins, surely, for there is no coherent reason for division. Then again cherished places must be kept secret lest they raise the need for valiant protectors; vanguards to authority. In line, associated with Israel and its partnering Promised Land is a (what should be obsolete) superstitious tradition which provides a kingly “Messiah” to tend to “peace on Earth”. In terms of feasibility, the concept is fraught with problems that, in effect can only lead to one ultimate outcome. Though I find no clear formal references to it in ancient folklore, the modern supposition that presumes a more wide-ranging “Greater Israel” should eventually emerge in the fullness of time has even been advanced in corporate mainstream Medias. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister, in particular, I’m informed presented a demonstrative land ready diagram which incorporates the whole of the Middle East and sections of some adjoining territories, though I haven’t personally witnessed it.
To the average person, measures might seem extreme, but for any radical, they would not go far enough. Why fill up a bucket with holes in it? Under this Peace on Earth (and God help everyone if it ever truly emerges) mandate, the entire Earth surface would become property of Israel (which, under their model, is not property of the people). And the only reason they don’t venture inwards to strange “undiscovered territories”, is they know efforts will guarantee Armageddon brought back on themselves. Bullies (and this is what these authorities are) are never particularly brave. I referenced the cult “Zionism” before. That is important; because historically a secret masonic body known as “Priory of Sion” evolved into Zionism, even though revolution might actually work as its antipathy (considering prior aims had been dedicated to preserving or restoring Zionist enemy number one authentic [Gnostic] regal heritage). Sion is a Hebrew word which equates to “fortress” or “gaol”. Hebrews set the ambition of reforming the great Atlantis citadel (euphemised as “Babel” in the Bible) back to reality. Perhaps I should add a little more to furbish better clarity of vision here. But first, not losing sight of the original investigation as to whether dated allegations issued by a website visitor characterising Anunaki as rogue time lords has credence, conclusions appears to approve the opinion, though “with reservations”.
In most ancient times, before the great flood event that may have wiped out then humanity, Sirians lived on Earth and walked amongst the people. Their efforts to relocate (to Earth) following catastrophe on Mars preceded risks, but fate did fairly decree the Anunaki (who had placed Lemurian “protectorate kings” to dispel unwelcome invaders) had moved on from Earth, perhaps never to return. Over a period greater than twenty thousand years, once settled, Sirians constructed various self-contained cities with inbuilt security (the Israelites can but dream of). Special monitoring systems assured that it was impossible to defy “rule” (even though there were no laws, in the empirical sense) inside the city. Those that committed infractions were initially contained (by an invisible light beam that had the effect of freezing anything “marked” in its path). Prisoners were later moved to holding cells while bureaucracy attempted to process resolve. Holding cells were all but jails, in conventional terms, and that is why, even up to relatively modern times, fortresses have doubled as prisons (following Atlantis convention).
Thus, “prison planet” is an expansion of the term Zionism (elevating Sion/Fortress) and if Greater Israel incorporates “the entire world”, in Toto, the overriding desire is to recreate an absolute Babel synthesis. Nevertheless, unlike Babel, tyrants can only rely on relatively primitive instruments to protect them against threats to the system that haven’t already been disposed of or aren’t “concentrated” into camps to guarantee security of the few. We can discern “options” for the masses are reduced to three: non-detection, confinement or disposal (murder). Considering ramifications In relation to this proposed brave new world, certain permanent inmates would need to be allowed to work as slaves for the benefit of the few. And, looking forward, doubtlessly the wheels of polite society would need lots of help to remain well oiled, so it is equally likely that select “gentiles” would be permitted to join privileged ranks (still slaves, but provided the misconception of common status). To uphold the peace paradigm, slaves “free” in society would have to be the distinct minority, unless special Atlantis-style policing techniques were made available. Consequentially, I would imagine (again, unless those special policing techniques were in circulation) everyone even remotely associated with “defence” would be attached to ruling classes or privilege. Routine brainwashing of insubordinates was tested to ill-effect long ago. Even today military agencies regularly use Manchurian candidates to carry out dirty assignments. These exercises leave backfiring karmic hallmarks, such as the 2005 London “bus bombings” blamed on terrorists. 2012 US (Colorado) “Batman” theatre shootings better highlight the “gap”. Killings were actually executed by accompanying “back up” professional hit men (almost certainly FBI Agents). In fact, only one of these types of operations went “almost” entirely to plan (for my research) and that was the 2009 Fort Hood massacre.
Though modern day “powers” attached to Israel have blatantly admitted to engaging in an ongoing and remorseless psychological operation (or psy-op), their profound amateurism would be made instantly redundant was human ever to master precise manipulation of genetic strata (which is to be found in quantum light). Atoms are akin to beacons. Then, production of elite warriors on demand could be guaranteed. A more difficult question bobs up in relation to this. Perhaps a short background is necessary prior to presentation. I have written about strange, other worldly social practices before, notably horrific reptilian assimilation (where volunteers are literally eaten alive). Under order of Ba’al, nature of balance or equilibrium transcends all other concerns. So if stronger parties decide to consume weaker ones, it is considered to efficiently purify society. In line with this philosophy, a body hosts a master/slave (one master and multiple slaves) environment which technically provides for all parties to maximise regime role potential. Relevantly, Prophet Zoroaster was an Asiatic Lumerian who campaigned against the Anunaki prior to the arrival of the Sirian refugees (i.e. at least forty thousand years ago). His legacy remains with stark warnings clearly preserved in survived teachings. Anunaki unsurprisingly work off identical philosophy pertaining to order as Ba’al (Ba’al an extension of absolute divinity). Using weather systems and other devices they were able to influence great groups of people, presumably against their will and that precise same justification supports Israelite power brokers’ crude adoption of their “sheeple steering” psy-op agenda. in my opinion.
We have observed the dichotomy that is Israel, “the nation”, according to recorded history, began as a comparatively small tract of land within earshot of the Mediterranean. It has grown, some believe, to consume planet Earth (Maritime Law, which influences global constitutional etiquette, evolved from whims of the great industrialist front, the East India Company), but what if outright control of the original Atlantis concept has been the consuming objective all along and we are merely witnessing steps along the path? For the Atlanteans, Israel is existence (and beyond) in its entirety. Indeed, the only prophesised secret “annexed” haven that might counter the rigours of existence is Sirius (a heavenly gateway that should only be accessed by ones with existential powers). Hijack of religions, supplementing education systems designed to “convert the masses” would be a logical first move of usurpers determined to redeem “fate” in their favour. Naturally, per these auspices, “thoughts” would have to be rationalised. Would there be roles for thought police? Corporate mass Medias have done everything possible to promote their sense of standardised convention (kinks merely illuminate internal differences of opinion). Be it cosmetic influences have fluctuated to compliment fashions of each era,
“Fundamentals” have never changed by much (if at all)
Some might determine the Anunaki have thieved God’s kudos by daring to present themselves as something divine. Yet, surely, from their lofty enlightened heights would not mundane perspective rightfully deem them worthy of awe. They were bestowed with the creative seeds and have used them productively, which is important for, in terms of desire, spontaneous creativity “under will” is the principle wish of the Almighty. Creation on Earth is undeniably Godly (natural), but for one hybrid creature who is neither being nor animal, but, rather, a fusion of the two. Offending human holds the DNA catalogue which maintains all life on Earth (that wasn’t introduced) and that is the great paradox. Already scientists tamper with amino acids with the ambition of working miracles, whilst overtly demonstrating limited to no respect for life. It is easy to blame Hebrew infidels whose ancestors (we presume) arrogantly made off with exalted Sirian heritage and marketed their plunder as though they had conceived it themselves, but we are all responsible for the mess which is the legacy. Instead we have complied with and ones with bad intentions have ultimately delivered chaos where bliss could have reigned. The result is a tiny strip of land called Israel, located in a stinking hot region of Earth, covertly governs a planet that is perpetually at war. Karma has rewarded the place called Israel fittingly. Vainly polluted by radioactive fallout, powers have forced disease upon themselves, but they have no remorse. I wonder what the “prize” is, when many Jews seem reluctant to “return” to their designate homeland.
If only the politics surrounding this topic were that transparent. My essay would have been wrapped up paragraphs ago. Today’s Israel is a synthetic oasis hewn out of Palestine. Essential water supply has been stolen from Lebanon in typical Hebrew fashion. Palestine, in most ancient times, was known as “the place that cannot support life”. Is that what the biblical Genesis wilderness years refer to? Why would the Jews return to the place they rejected, a place they bragged was inhuman, unless it was a “decoy”, a “shoo in”? Anywhere can be made nice with enough money and technology. Though illustrious texts attempt to paint a different picture, Jewish “slaves” exodus from Babylon was welcomed but for the loss of the Great Pyramid’s fuse box, rendering Egyptians powerless. Canaan was supposedly conquered as a stop gap 1000BC, yet Jews settled for hundreds of years. I question standard chronology and recommend that Canaan’s timeline came before the wilderness years. Phoenicians (Philistine ancestors) made that location their home long after Israelites had vacated. Later some descendants may have returned to the region. Might there be a clue as to authenticity in the name “Ca-na-an”? Well, most ancient use of “ca” takes two distinct paths. “Ca” (which makes ca-nine) is the dog. More pertinently (and ironically found in modern day Romanian) “ca” substitutes for contract. Latin term “capias” was used to designate writs against non-payment of debts or financial obligations. Thus, “ca” in Atlantis tongue meant “judgemental contract” or something like prison. Are dogs not prisoners of their “owners”?
The remaining parts of Ca-na-an seem very straightforward to interpret. “Na” is “the feminine aspect” and “an” is Almighty God. Contextually meanings are very different in the way that they are used, of course. One would be tempted to presume feminine aspect of God referred to Sophia or “astral heaven”, but how could heaven dish out punishment? So, in this case, a very liberal view needs to be applied to interpretation. I am drawn once more to the biblical tale of Adam and Eve. Regular visitors to this website will already be aware that Eve was not “Adam’s wife”. Text conceals the truth about genetic originals. Adam was natural man (i.e. Neanderthal, or one of the earlier versions) and Eve is human. Human was considered much more [comparatively] feminine (also emphasising our spirituality) than natural man, but there is more to the puzzle. Hu-man may have been named after Hu “in reverence” to the genetic licensee, but unlicensed geneticists created us. We were the product of an earlier mentioned bipedal serpent (deliberately camouflaged by the biblical text so as not to blurt out the truth, in my opinion) which informally goes under the group name “Sephardim”. Commonly known as reptilians, because our physical DNA is similarly matched to theirs, in addition it appears they chose to marry into elite clans when humanity was a hubris. Accordingly, reptilian genetic material changed the human constitution and was always delivered down the female line. That schism is marked by the acute difference between male and female humans. But there’s more. Reptilians are androgynous and more closely align to our female character set (preferring emotion to logic). So now is the time to offer Zechariah Sitchin a posthumous apology. Still bottom of the class for his woeful interpretation of meaning, he earns top marks for portioning Anu and Naki in that manner. Anu should be broken as An-U and Naki compiles “Na” and “Ki”. Ki is better known as “chi” (or the inner spirit). So An-U-Na-Ki simply translates to “God’s bridge to female intent”. Clearly Sephardim are direct versions of Anunaki and that is why their partnership leveraging our sun (sol invictus) is permissible.
Anyway, hopefully the penny is beginning to drop in relation to Canaan. “Na” the feminine aspect is a reference to reptilian and “an” substitutes for [confirms] our direct unlicensed creator. Whilst the biblical account (fall from grace) contradicts truth, Israelites were banished to Canaan initially under reptilian guard (check out those enigmatic Babylonian depictions). It is possible (indeed, likely) that their jailors ascended while they were on duty, but at some juncture they vacated. Whatever the reasons, the prevailing power vacuum ensured freedom for all incarcerated. It appears some Hebrews then moved (in pace with biblical Genesis) to the wilderness (which is mis-described) leaving behind ones later to be called Phoenicians. I mentioned earlier about strong evidence decrying the traditional Holocaust as phoney. Yet, wider Jewish populations still whine and whine about the event as though it was current. They love to play eternal victim. Transfer identical reasoning across to the wilderness years suggests present day Israel is located precisely where the Jews settled after Canaan. It was the wilderness. Today, with money and technology, authorities have been able to cultivate a region unfit for living into an unnatural oasis. It seems to me that the Promised Land of Moses was most definitely not in the same region. Speculation supporting the Emerald Isle (or Ireland) as the most pertinent contender appears the best match, weighing up the Irish language is one of the closest out of place tongues notionally related to Hebrew. They have many shared words which could not be so without some prior ancient transposition of cultures.
Israel, it seems, was an attempt to provision for a new Babel. That is why Hebrews preferred to settle in Judea (within earshot) of pilgrimages to their Holy Land, yet, what of the Sirians in relation to Sirius? We know that after the Fall of Atlantis, the bulk of their population left for somewhere distant. Monks that made the sacrificial choice to stay behind to tend to needs of banished humans were advised they would never be able to rejoin their brethren. I haven’t fully understood why this is so, but it might have something to do with coded star-gates that open very infrequently (let’s say every ten thousand years). More conceivably, exiting Sirians would have extinguished tracks so unwanted invaders could not follow them. Earth bound monks were telepathically linked to loved ones but future physical engagement would become impossible. That is why I questioned our knowledge of the true location of Sirius at the beginning of this essay. Having said that, it is unlikely a star could support life, even in higher dimensional state. Be it some argue our sun reverts to planetary status in Holographic Universe Two and above, the most compelling reconstruction is Sirius acts as gateway to somewhere cherished, because life hosting would need a less volatile environment.
Couched in Babylonian folklore is the obvious destination, which is Osiris, of course. Fittingly, according to myths, Osiris is Lord of the Underworld (dead) and great judge. Whereas this may imply a role for Uranus (dwelling of rested spirits), Sirians are renowned for judgement (more in the positive than negative sense). The underworld reference might equally represent the essential dimensional shift (altered state) required to gain access to “heaven” (place of the dead). 1984 (vibration year of the “Philadelphia Experiment” time slip) founded cult called Order of Solar Temple obsessed over return to Sirius and various members committed suicide in 1997 in their efforts to make the journey. Appetites whetted, observant will note that Osiris shares all letters of Sirius, except “u”. If that is coincidence, it is remarkable. We know that “u” signifies gateway, which, in context, is a specific astral quantity. Though some planets do operate restricted time portals, stars are vastly superior “visionary” exchange mechanisms and would offer better access potential. Without “u” S-i-r-i-s stands for “Anunaki domain of the Kingdom of God”. Sirians are “face of God” Anunaki, so “Sirian domain of the Kingdom of God” would satisfy definition just as well. For the planet, Siris evolves from “O”. “O” reinforces the notion that this is a domain, but more than that. It also represents order, restriction or limit if you will. Thus, observant may determine that Osiris is Siris “under rule [of law]”. Unfortunately the Babylonians neglected to tell us where their Osiris is located, but maybe relevant science exploration will get lucky and find the connected star one day.
Conversely, is there an alternative potential route to nirvana, one that might baffle science? My prior mention of Venus could not have conceived any possible link to Sirius at the time. But, as has been the way with past projects, insight blossoms as ideas present. From my earliest memories of thoughts on the matter, I always knew that inner Venus (potent fertility) had hosted a model Anunaki civilisation until political problems escalated several decades ago, which was confirmed when I became aware of Valiant Thor’s visit and subsequent [alleged] three year imprisonment as guest of Eisenhower’s Whitehouse in the 1950’s. I did not draw connection to Sirians, until now. Venus appears to be a beacon or echo point that would offer a “conduit” direct to Sirius. In other words, Venus could double as backup route to Osiris. However, using Valiant Thor as guinea pig, though he largely compared to a typical white Caucasian human, there was noteworthy a tiny physical difference. He did not possess a belly button (which sycophants’ claim relates to “angelic status”) and this cordially implies different reproductive and birthing methods are utilised by Sirians. There were varied reports related to a strange technique demonstrating the ability to vanish or dematerialise at will (suggesting Valiant Thor’s physical bandwidth extended beyond 3D). Venus has a much more ancient name, Nibiru. Occasionally referred to as Planet X because of its rather peculiar orbital misdirection, according to my calculations, the heavenly body will alarm astrologists by venturing very close (within earshot) to Earth in roughly nine hundred years’ time. However, my figures could be very wrong. I can say this in relation to the crossing of paths, so to speak. Last time it happened (thousands of years ago), distances were close enough to allow regular cultural exchanges between inhabitants of the two planets. Will humanity, at last, be granted the window of opportunity to ascend and will this permit license to be Sirian for the lucky few?