Tag Archives: Amon

Saturn, Influential Time-lords and Separatist Sirians

Standard
Saturn, Influential Time-lords and Separatist Sirians

Ever since new human began reporting on the incubus of his reflective observations, history has managed to precariously chart ongoing and endless conflicts between emotional and intellectual persuasions. Accordingly, this piece originally inspired to follow the title “Science Myth Exploded – Hu Man and the Sirian Factor” in a perhaps vain attempt to comprehend the whys and wherefores of turbulent historic saga. In emotional terms, could compassion and conscientiousness ever be separated? On reflection, the answer to that question is “quite possibly” but, as importantly, how does that reference to the dark mystery that surrounds competent understanding of the hubris of our species’ conception and evolution? The Human Genome Project, according to Alex Collier, had identified more than twenty alien genetic lines or traits of humanity at the time of his announcement. He is not a professional geneticist and perhaps that information is too liberal for academic tastes, but it serves the purpose of reinforcing the point I am about to make. In light of this I have also possibly been over liberal myself in the use of the word species. For clarity, I have continued to maintain terms that convey humanity actually mirrors different batches of hybrids when discussing occasioned associated genome makeup. Thankfully, analytical evidence emerging from the project largely supports the potential for that view to be pertinent.

It is only when I try and extrapolate the components that have been specifically used to build the human hybrid that I run into severe formal identity problems. One of the great mysteries, for instance, is how logic and emotion can work in unison at all. We invariably take the truth for granted. Our brains are dual-functional. Doesn’t that propose the ultimate paradox? The magnificent cerebral cortex seems to have been crudely bolted onto an indefinitely inferior animalistic contraption. Take away his golden crown and human would become little more than a conceited, sickly ape (and I have encountered plenty of those with cerebral cortex intact). Therefore it is vital to assess origins and assign apt characterisations if any comprehension is to be gleaned at all. Where did the cerebral cortex come from?

Geneticists may well desire to supply tyrannies of confusion by way of their explanatory resolve, but they cannot overlook the fact it is found in no other creature on this planet. Are everyday apes or other mammals without one blessed with intellectual prowess? At least one mature gorilla has been rated with a human mental age of six by psychologists. Work done under Hilter’s regime in Germany tested dogs’ philosophic belief systems communicated via Morse code. Results revealed simplistic values that would match those of human toddlers. Even so, ironically, if there was any materialistic part of us that might be blamed for “causing” our mortality, the cerebral cortex would be it. By chance, competent thorough understanding of latent holistic spiritual “activation” power would significantly extend potential lifespans.

Of course many other factors would need to be addressed too. Dedication to war and pollution would have to cease without compromise. I know of no one that can verify why our life force permits disease (and death). Responding “it just does” highlights the ignorance of those that supposedly care. Committed attention to discovery will demystify every cause. Also, it is all well and good to wish for an absence of war and pollution, but how can we practically be at peace with our environment and ourselves? Solutions are definitely hampered by a lack of “tolerance”. Therefore, what is the ceiling to “human group” tolerance? This is an important question, because if we are not careful, on our current path, we will destroy ourselves through pain of ineptitude.

Perhaps we need to look farther afield for alternatives. Have there been other alien cultures whose legacies are able to provide insight as to how to construct utopian existence? A symptom of the perilous human course has encapsulated an ongoing contest between “group think” colonists against (largely a feature of devoted oppression) “sovereign” individuals. The psychology of this is well argued by Jon Rappoport. I recommend investigation of his extensive writings. It is also a subject that made a brief appearance last article. By that vein, I was given the opportunity to introduce the Pleiadians. These enigmatically loveable “aliens” are arguably evidence of ancient attempts to “bridge” Martian and ape.

Apes, it might shock readers to know, are simple versions of “reptilians”. They, in this capacity, act as manifestly inferior agents of the “Draco” (an affiliation of reptilian and other species). The lower the vibrational state, the more a civilisation relies on emotional interactions and boundaries.  Nonetheless, under these terms, apes still vaguely demonstrate basic hallmarks of Draco Pteroid and Ciakar social character. Pteroids, I have mentioned before, are the substantive product of Pterodactyl DNA. Creating body “upgrades“, they used their own DNA template (coupling with additional genetic materials emphasising Tyrannosaur) to mould Ciakar. By comparison, incidentally, human being should be classed as best of breeds as he not only incorporates both DNA sets from the Pteroid/Ciakar catalogues but also has a range of other components (albeit in present crimped form most are dysfunctional) which make him cosmically “unique”.

Gene functionality is rarely understood. For instance, considering scientists laughably propose that, from their genetic perspective, Tyrannosaurus Rex is closest related to a “domestic chicken”, formal review of how plausible “divine” engineering might or might not function is more or less non-existent. It is largely this realisation that has motivated my desire to “fill the void” left by science. Correspondingly, the need to somewhat broaden the investigative range of this essay as a remedy for terminal ignorance has become my new transitional goal. It is clear that discussions should wander into alien territories if malfeasant science is to be thwarted and, in that regard, “Science Myth Exploded – Hu Man and the Sirian Factor” is simply too refined, too insular for the task.

To test sufficient understanding as to significantly why things have transpired in the way they have beckons for a stereoscopic “big picture” presentation. We need to go right to the top to get to the bottom of this. I must make discordant waves and ask the big questions if my dedication to the mission is to be suitably reflective. My decision on a new title sufficiently primed to open up mind doors therefore reads as follows. “Saturn, Influential Time-lords and Separatist Sirians” inspires me.  Hopefully essay conclusions will inspire my readership too and vilify that corrective adjustment. So without further ado, I’ll kick off with the first associated investigative quest.

Putting it bluntly, who or what are these vigilant separatist Sirians?

Though I don’t think ever mentioned “by name”, written and unwritten history reflects on their involvement with several Atlantis civilisations. That, therefore, seems the logical place to embark on the quest. In addition to what I revealed last article, I can now highlight the language of the most ancient Atlantis civilisation (on Mars) did not convey the negative or “anti” sense of anything. By example, my prior use of the word “dysfunctional” is untranslatable and possibly meaningless to those distant peoples. There is a reason for this, of course. There are always reasons for everything, even if reasoning appears unfathomable per insular cultural identity.

Going right back to the beginning, when time was at its dawn, insular negativity had such an effect on the whole, it began holding the serpentine Anunaki back. No one can precisely say “when”, but at some juncture the focus on detraction evolved to such a point it reached “schism”. Though the mythos had not identified an independent branch yet, group view concluded “Sirian” (as is known now) obsession was the cause of internal acrimony. Comparable incidence in human Earth communities identifies with the case of the peoples of India who annexed separatist Pakistan because sovereign dependent desire became incompatible with the whole. When developmental differences become too toxic for popular enlightened cooperation, the only excusable recourse is separation. Per almost identical philosophy, the ophidian group created the Martian-Sirian offshoot in order to purge itself of badness (to use the vernacular).

Here is where it becomes clear why Sirians refrained from the use of negatives in their original language. Once umbilical detached from the Anunaki, they presumed the cause of the crossroads was their infinite superiority (goodness) over the other.  Per these conditions, they supported an unyielding observation towards (belief in was my original choice of description, but I now feel terminology is specifically erroneous) “intellectualisation of truth”. Indeed their knowledge was considered so pure, lateral translation could not separate out “existential divinity”. Their knowledge and their tongue was effective “word of God”, or so they persuaded themselves. It was an outlook that proposed if creation’s direction was purposeful, then only terms that embraced progressive purposefulness were necessary. Negativity, by correlation, viscerally blocks positivity. As all words ultimately support or defy calculated practices, dissenting reflections were deemed creatively obstructive. Hence, anti-expressions were not possible in maiden Atlantis dialogue. There were no words to craft thoughts of this type.

Ophidian isolation did not come about through breeds of idealism. Instead, divisions were arguably considered necessary for survival. Sirians viewed control as something that was “preordained” (conceptually manipulated by the Sephardim under terms of “Ra” on Earth) and in order to append their engaging zeal, they have contaminated one star system not to mention destroying numerous heavenly bodies over the eons.  In conjunction with this, highlighted by Gnostic rebuke of the Pharisees for their forgetfulness, over-zealousness preceded an abominable “God complex”. Insular Sirian wisdom ended up supporting vicious enlightenment to such a degree that, for all other “alien” entities, submissive cooperation was the only “peaceful option” (for those ensconced within social range). Consequentially, the responding route to salvation reads like a tragic roadmap and though there probably was a need for linguistic negatives, none were permissible. Their precise formulas were so exacting, “experimentation” or divergence from “the path” was pointless. Perhaps ironically, the ancient Atlantis language did have several words that contextually conveyed reflective meanings of “no” so it was eminently possible to rebel.

Compared to Sirians, ophidian reptilians (which by no means identify with reptiles on Earth) are all faithless. Long did I presume they adore laws (the apex of control) but, strictly speaking, it could be said the reverse is so. Nevertheless they are certainly captivated by them and for good reason. Social networks are very important to Sephardic reptilians in particular. That said; each network has its own set of vibes, rites and traditions. Their lawmakers were very clever when they conceptualised popular solutions. They managed, somehow, to abridge all these differing vibes and other political considerations into something everyone could “tune to”. The solution was to zone and tier laws because standardisation only ever promotes cultural division and conflict. In some ways their justice mechanisms are identical to ours. The significant difference is they have managed to brilliantly integrate Sirian philosophy into active reasoning that supports the many and varied characterisations ultimately defining harmonious social interaction which are “society”.

Our “powers” brag about being Atlantis seeds in private, but the reality is as clear as day.  They simply do not comprehend Sirian mindset, and the reflective transition that is our legal system has been a vocational disaster from conception, demonstrated by the truth that our laws cause more disputes than resolves. Capability to discern and apply aspects of Sirian mindset is embedded in the mechanics of our cerebral cortex. One symptom which might almost be classed as a “syndrome” is the conscience. Though it is unfathomably permissible to break conscience (attested in the manner humans deny truth to benefit self) every one of us instinctively knows right from wrong. When conflicts with “self” arise, we learn to look the other way, procrastinate and deceive ourselves. Rather interestingly it is impossible to distinctly arbitrate “right from wrong” as judgement relies on the precise order of each specific set of circumstances. “Laws” in that way largely frustrate sincere contemplation leading to effective and honest verdict.

A prior article of mine topically observed the custom whereby certain Sephardic Jews allegedly drop the “hu” from human in recognition only of standalone man. Man, according to this unspoken tradition, appears to signify our reptilian nature by default. In other places I have informed readers the “overlord” creators (specifically angelic dragons personifying creative instructions of Ba’al) of everything that lives on our planet surface today revered Tyrannosaurus Rex as their most supreme result. T-Rex was ultimate man to them. However, after a giant war in defence of Earth’s attack from Sirian ancestors, (but for preserved DNA) creator dragons witnessed this prized livestock perish. Utilising assets from war spoils after the Sirians defeat, they first created a new creature (proto man) from pterodactyl atomic DNA archives as they did not believe tyrannosaur would succeed under the changed climate conditions. But they always yearned for the return of majestic T-Rex.  The new creature (mentioned earlier) is colloquially known as “Pteroid” of course (though the dragons provided it with a name that is hard to pronounce) and it went through several phases of evolution before its celestial DNA ascended to spiritual status beyond the reality plane.

Originally Petroid was a fusion composed of components loosely comparable with bat, dog and ape. Did the Japanese creators of Godzilla and King Kong innocently pay homage to this unwritten prehistoric history? A battle between Tyrannosaurus Rex and Pteroid sounds like a thrilling affair to me. In these times “men” were true warriors and stone tables (such as the henges) offered braves sanctuary. Soldiers only fought honourable battles then. The warrior tradition of man in fact only subsided relatively recently, perhaps in the last few centuries of our timeline. Fanatical commerce changed the status of war forever. Don’t they say Camelot was the last real battle?

Here we should not lose sight of the fact that human spent a very long period on Mars (I will review this in more detail later) where terms of living were very different. Armed conflict between civilisations was impossible there and this was partly because our cerebral functionality was significantly enhanced at the time (arguably as much caused by the atmosphere and foods we ingested as any other contributors). Pteroid, a spectacular ape, had no cerebral cortex. Dragons inexplicably chose to censor the most important component of Sirian heritage, or so it appears on face value. Nevertheless, upon careful reflection, we will learn that they deliberately opted out and I shall outline reasoning presently.

In the same article where I made observations about Sephardic Jews, I also determined that “hu” represents ape, whereas (in a sense by default) “man” supplants reptilian nature. This conclusion was such an oversimplification of truth; I sadly fell into the propagandists’ trap. In fact, if comparable physiologies were available for cross-check, reinforcing my earlier sentiment, scientists would determine all apes are reptilian. “Hu”, preserved history informs, is an abbreviation of the Celtic (breakaway Jewish) God Hu Gaddam. After reviewing crude antique characterisations of appearance, there is no doubt that this is a “late stage of evolutionPteroid which visually presents as the mythical Satyr (one with a reputation for wine, women and song). Occult “Satanists” also often depict it as a strange goat headed, bare breasted “furry” figure (a gross pantheist metaphor). Are Baphomet’s “metaphorical” wings symbolic of mastery over the heavens?

Rather upsetting the apple cart, according to unofficial Jewish folklore (biblical texts are extraneous of the Talmud), human (Eve) was created from the side (rib) of man (Adam). Adam (which should not be confused with the gnosis of Sophia’s Yaldebroath), in this context, can only refer to the anthropological missing link Neanderthal ape. This particular version of Neanderthal would have also had to have been contemporary with the human creation date of around 125,000 years ago (i.e. if we could find a perfectly preserved example embalmed just before the cosmic war of 120-102,000BC, it could be used as evidence for human). Was, as tradition postulates, the Sephardic Jew to have rejected “Hu” in service to “man”, then a whole different emphasis is being tendered. In which case, what is the significant difference between “stylised ape” and “ape”? Do the Jews refer to the “reptilian” aspect after all?

Before I can make any credible assessments, it is important to thoroughly investigate that other “missing link”; the one that science refuses to even contemplate. Sometime prior to Pteroid’s destined transcendence to higher dimensions, his replacement was commissioned. Presumably largely the result of pressure from persistent dragons seeking vilification, it was decided that a new type of tyrannosaur would wander the Earth in Pteroid’s wake. Tyrannosaurus Rex was a vicious creature but it also had an extraordinary mind (I explain about true dinosaur brain functionality in this article). Liberally akin to modern day alligator and many times more productive than any human rancher, it could coordinate the herding and ambush of livestock with chilling efficiency. Nevertheless, there was a spiritual aspect to them as well and they could independently discern right from wrong. Parents, for instance, would never attack their own offspring.

A good example to demonstrate just how unstable tyrannosaur DNA can be when applied to hybridisation scenarios is emphasised in the celebrated account of late Phil Schneider’s violent subterranean encounter with a so-called “Tall Grey”. This “smelly trash can” (as Schneider poetically described it) is part “Zeta”. “Zeta” (presumed to originate from Zeta Reticuli) Grey Beings tick on the popular level of Star Wars “Yoda”. Amply revered as “wise men” by their peers, a reputation backed by a long history of logically passive “king making”, they are hereditary devout pacifists. Even their flexible DNA is widely used as a hybrid “binding agent” (perhaps similar to putty in construction). Enterprising reptilian Sephardim presumably theorised a more comprehensive gene application would make the ideal companion for tyrannosaur to tone down the aggression.

As Phil Schneider (lucky to survive the laser attack from the creature) painfully learnt, their experiment didn’t work and the legacy was a vocational catastrophe. Suzy Hansen informs us in her book “Dual Soul Connection” that Zetas (she calls them “Grey Beings”) draw vegetable matter through the skin by way of sustenance. Tall greys ingest nutrients in the same basic manner with one significant variation. Uniquely, they immerse themselves in special vats of living body fluids (blood and sinew) to “feast” heartily. Aside from their constant dreadful aroma, they suffer from vocational paranoia making them irrationally violent towards unknown “invaders”.

Thankfully the few subterranean Tall Greys that survive today are dying out, unable to naturally reproduce

Hybridisation is rarely easy or quick. For instance, I am led to believe the replacement for “Pteroid” took upwards of 700,000 years to gestate properly, and then further 100,000’s years were devoted to perfecting process results. Though Pteroids are given credit for the final creation, they originally referred affairs to superior dragons who, in turn, invited assistance from external (extra-terrestrial) entities prior to the project going ahead. Engagement led to political repercussions and some parties that had been excluded ended up giving input. The result was an alien mixed gene compound became the basis for the conceptual new direction of tyrannosaur/man. Simon Parkes has correctly reported that higher echelons of the Sephardim regard any form of menial work as something below their status. Therefore, reflectively, senior Pteroids would not likely have had hands on involvement with incubation cycles. Here I would imagine that exported aliens with the greatest interests in genetic assets took on roles as proxy team leaders to organise the equivalent of ((i.e. some other culturally versed formulaically cloned entities) today’s so-calledrobot grey” technicians.

Putting alien DNA and other potential “contaminants” to one side, new tyrannosaur man (Sephardim or “Ciakars” as they are colloquially known) was actually substantively old Pteroid. This not only meant that the Sephardim (group) were bestowed with identical Sirian genetics (ones absent of cerebral cortex remember), but, in effect, they were also technically humans too. Knowledge of which places considerable ambiguity as to the meaning of possible orthodox Jewish persuasion that “hu” should be stricken from man and rejected at all cost. Do they take umbrage at the dragons’ preference towards tyrannosaur?

In addition, why do they name Adam (a decisive “hu” relative) “man”? Are there “different connotations” of the term man at play here? Is that what I’m missing? There is another possibility too. Most illogically, separatist Jews perhaps refer to the hidden Sirian qualities expressed by our magnificent brains. This would be illogical because it would mean Genesis is misinterpreted. Under those auspices, “Eve” would have to be the wife of Adam (who is “man”) and not “human”. Confusions allayed, is man worshiped because of his divinity (cerebral cortex)? If so, how can we substantiate how “having a conscience” significantly changes adaptation to applicable collective social relationships?

Expanding that line of thinking, would it to be possible to attribute a different background to those “missing links” I highlighted earlier; a background that perhaps lays the foundation for other successfully purposeful Sirian hybridisation projects? My last article made the startling revelation that Pleiadians (in relation to this planet) were aquatic mer-people. I also exposed details on their extraordinary mentoring role over Atlantis civilisations here. Notably the largest social community under their umbrella was actually located where Egypt is today. Few are aware that the Great Pyramid of Giza landmark was a Sirian-Lemurian joint venture project constructed over 30,000 years ago to mark the boundary between Atlantis and Mu. I personally recall living near pyramids in a past life incarnation, a time when everyone seemed to wear lightweight pale linen tunics. If you stood too close to a pyramid it made you feel weird, presumable a consequence of wireless energy.  Then lands were heavily submerged and the amphibious Pleiadians found refuge in waterways.

In correction of last article’s vital omission concerning Pleiadians

Thankfully occasional perceptive commenters do exist. Last article something drew my attention in the responses section (were “cosmic forces” at odds with me? I had to rescue the item from the website spam filter). Completely overlooked prior, suffice to say, never before had I rationalised that [Atlantis located] Pleiadians were a “reptilian” species. Incidental information this may be, but to me the news is as Earth shattering as it is demure. My much earlier confusion over Rosemary Klem’s surrogate Atlantis seabed setting encompassing the conceptualisation of a “utopian” Sephardic generation base now makes absolute sense. Be it she perhaps doesn’t realise the place never existed in the fully material sense, it may dramatically come into being for experiencers when Earth shifts to Tara (i.e. Holographic Universe One transitions into Holographic Universe Two and old reality turns into new reality).

Surprisingly evidence supporting real physical marine Pleiadians is not unknown (and thus means they don’t formally class as aliens). Filmed on numbers of occasions, their skeletons (significantly, the skull is “ridged” and fingers fused to make a flipper) are also occasionally found, most commonly washed up on beaches. Even so the Pleiadian energy field has always caused me the greatest angst. Only now do I understand why my impression of its menacing nature has persisted. Parried against popular propaganda (origins possibly from channelled Sephardic sentiment), Pleiadian nature expressed in terms of that which is close to the divine doesn’t configure at all. Corresponding body energy field calibrations better compare to Charles Hall’s zany “Tall Whites”. Never a subscriber to coincidence my thoughts burn over plausible connections between Pleiandians and Tall Whites. Fortuitously perhaps, my yet-to-be-published book “The Birth of Hu-Man-ity” theorises the Tall White is version three human, created less than 50,000 years ago.

Though I can’t say for certain as I know of no autopsies conducted or their results, I would place a very large bid on the prospect that Pleiadians either have a cerebral cortex or a sufficiently functioned “version” of something that can produce similar intellectual qualities.  Therefore, if that was so, the “missing link” engendered in the Adam and Eve tale is neither configured from “hu” nor “man”. Under such circumstances (vilifying highlighted Jewish superstition) it must refer to the Pleiadian connection. To add gravy to this formula, they would have been already part-way (humanly) compatible, courtesy of an enhanced reptilian status, In fact, I would go further to promote the idea that human is actually an adapted mer-man (hence our slightly webbed fingers) rather than a primary ape. Though it is important to add, other extra-terrestrial Pleiadians (presumably of different hybrid mixes) are known to be land dwellers (such as the Nordics?) and may be, consequentially, very different in nature. In conclusion, evidence of the human hereditary Sirian path is most likely courtesy of Pleiadian lineages. Specifically I identify them as version six in “The Birth of Hu-man-ity”.

Visual footage of active reptilians is much more limited, but stock is out there. The most celebrated film consists of several minutes’ inspection of a presumed deceased figure wrapped in some kind of “foil” preserving blanket. It is at least seven feet tall, according to the commentator who also claimed it had attempted to “accost him” and he had been forced to subdue it in “self-defence”. Myths describing occasional unannounced interactions with similarly imposing figures suggest smaller human is far stronger than reptile men. It is said they are “easy” to render unconscious. African tales also highlight their severe allergy to titanium metal. Tradition has it warriors’ donned suitably tipped spears in order to ward a successful eradication campaign on the southern continent over 15,000 years ago.

Returning to the celebrated video (incidentally shot sometime in the 1990’s); I wonder why a preserving blanket was used. It seems to me the only logical explanation would be that it was there to shield the body flesh for a planned autopsy. Did one take place and what was discovered? Assuming the corpse was inspected by career professionals; were too many similarities with the human anatomy found for comfort? Did they, to their horror, find the sex organs (in particular) were identical or almost identical to human? If that was the case, what are the implications? Does it mean they can engage in physical cross-species reproduction with humans? Was this to be true, it places a whole new avenue of consideration regards Jewish superstitions over the status of “man”.

Referring to the Adam and Eve saga once more, genetic materials (biological dust) “taken from Adam’s side (rib)” could have been either used to clone or hybridise another model. The text clarifies that in order to regulate procedures, “God” had to place Adam “into a trance” (i.e. or under anesthetisation). So if the Jewish view concerns a specifically “reptilian” crossbreed, then no obvious reference is made in the Adam and Eve story beyond possible suggestions embroiled in the “fruits of the orchard” (genetic traits) analogy. In fact, the “Fall from Grace” episode states that after “God” learned of the “snake’s” corruption he “did something” to reptiles to make the women dislike them from then on.

Why women in particular and how did the relationship fare prior to this dramatic [genetic] alteration?

This is an important question as, currently, mirroring evasive Sasquatch, there are no DNA benchmark references available for scrutiny, or, better, none have been publicised. Is the reason for this tinged with conspiracy? Might erstwhile phantom findings, if released, categorically disprove politically favourable conjecture concerning spurious connections between man, ape, human and reptilian? Perhaps these, in part, would ridicule current rigid key genetics principles. I need to stress that, in its use here, the term reptilian does not demark earth surface reptile genetics or their embodied character traits. In fact, if the truth be known, Sephardic humanoids are ostensibly cold blooded mammals that possess a dual (hot/cold) pulmonary system (fused in humans). As with our deep sea squids, they can activate either system at will, but prefer cold blood status because it makes them more “rational”. Perhaps the terms “in a spurt of hot blood” or “it made my blood boil” in their suggestion of over calculated passions when used gives some credence to this as a consideration.

The way that the human brain functions ensures characters of men and women branch differently. In light of this, I would like to pose the unobvious question; could “reptilians” of all genders be more closely aligned to the human female than the male? Perhaps some answers might be gleaned from “tangents” here. We’ll see. First I note, and though they are rather similar looking to us in some ways, generally speaking, marine Pleiadian men appear essentially ugly when compared against the symmetrical beauty of their females. Mermaids found their way into old sea shanties. Why no mention of the men? Next, I posit that emotional human women are tuned much closer to the reptilian [black light] spectrum than logically lateral [spiritual white light] men. In addition, Sephardic reptilians strut like ostriches and our women are sometimes endearingly called “birds”, “chicks” because of a more quirky (avian-like) gait than men (other than Latino chicos perhaps?).

When the Sephardim were originally created, one of the key DNA asset holders were the Lyrans (lions). Is this possibly why, partnered with those avian similes, our women regularly attract feline nicknames, such as vixen, cat, tigress and so on? Interestingly Simon Parkes (who is married to a Lyran) once profoundly stated on camera (AMACH interview) that his (Sephardic) hosts told him the creature with the closest similarity to them (on Earth) is the household cat. Does this account for the considerable number of surviving topical ancient Babylonian statuettes and corresponding pharmkaxia (sorcery – witch’s cat) tradition? It doesn’t take a wild imagination to visualise what breeds of tyranny Pharaoh Akhenaten faced.

Beneath the veil that confounds Babylonian tradition is another sensationally enigmatic figurine which is commonly used as prop to illustrate deep historic reptilian “conspiracies”. Theorists have yet to contemplate the significance of the item correctly in isolation though. Made from useful quartz rock, the depiction of “reptilian woman with baby” formally substitutes as a lamp. With correct technological knowledge, an electric field can be generated through the rock which causes it to profusely illuminate. Though complimenting effects are as beautiful as they are efficient, that is not the point I am trying to make here. Beyond clearly raising mother and child to “angelic status” (by the light transformation), why did the Babylonians model this objet d’art on such an unusually serpentine theme?

Perhaps it was a “joke”? Did the Babylonians ever favour the surreal? In answer to these questions, they certainly upheld a tradition of accountability which meant specific attributes were sometimes presented as “spiritual metaphors”. I cannot personally fathom the poignant specific symbolism of reptilian humanoid holding baby as it makes no obvious contextual spiritual sense to me. This considered, there are two prominent oddities. Firstly, the statue is an unmistakable fusion of reptile and human woman perhaps some might say in same the way “Marvel Comics” could have envisaged subject matter. In that respect it is the only Babylonian icon of its kind to my knowledge. The next point is a crucial one. The baby is suckling. I have no intimate understanding of reptilian birthing culture, but the way the (rather disproportional) infant is held and method used seems identically human?

Therefore, it seems to me, that the statue stands out more as an experiment with surrealism if it is to be evaluated in purely symbolic terms. Taking into account that this would have been a mesmerizingly beautiful feature lamp in full operation (though the illustrated photograph may be of a cheap copy); might not the figurine most logically attest celebration of a very special event? If it is “surreal” it is one of a kind that arrogantly defies contemporary artistic culture.  Even so having no details on reflective politics that might credibly place thematic content puts me in an academically ambiguous position. My only option is to attribute pragmatic guesswork that promotes valid considerations so stable in resolve, reconstruction will forge a watertight case with sufficient spectral basis as to prelude the full decoding of this enigma.

The figurine itself might best class as a possible clue, but, when you have no more than that, well, a glimmer must be embraced as your plausible route to salvation

There is something recognisable about the structure of the woman’s face. To me features look remarkably Hassidic. Perhaps that is a coincidence, but these inconsistencies all add up when attributing the “big picture”. Given the eye catching suckling act, could the reptilian woman have been holding a human baby? Was that the significance (in the sense of specialness) of the artistic portrayal? If it was a human baby, why was it being held by the reptilian woman? Was she the mother? Alternatively, the statue maker could have been making the wide statement “reptilians are just like us”. I find the prospect of this as the summary effort towards a “thousands of years old anti-Racism campaign” hard to believe, particularly as (to my knowledge) there is no supporting written legacy. Besides, in my opinion that message is far too insignificant for an iconic lamp of great beauty – an heirloom for prosperity. Unless she was a perverse nanny or some kind of domestic help, clearly it was her child, or why would she be suckling it? If that was so then, once again, it would hardly validate the role as centrepiece for a timeless spiritual masterwork.

Assuming the reptilian woman was a real life figure, I would imagine that she was regarded as sufficient important to have been featured, in fact I think she is no ordinary reptilian woman though memory of her would have been very much localised to the period when she existed. Factoring in the baby’s expected (though unusual) human status points the niggling finger at the father, who, one would guess was of equal or greater social status than the woman herself. Her husband would assuredly present a huge clue as to reasons behind the celebration embroiled in the enigmatic figurine. Could this individual have been a Babylonian monarch? It would place a good circumstantial theory that their offspring were the original “chosen people”? Perhaps the suckling baby was the first blood Jew. Is that why primal Jews called themselves “Sephardim”; in homage of royal reptilian traits?

Maybe this is true, but there is a monstrous nagging consideration impeding the philosophy. I have witnessed a strange white dragon that carries what looks like a greying toupee uneasily perched on top of its head. Never have I identified a reptilian with cranial or facial hair other than a rather wispy snake mannered entity whose unruly straight locks are invariably accompanied by a broad coat hanger moustache. Was not Samson’s power in his hair? Of the numerous reptilian types, a humanised T-Rex miniature in brown flying suit approached my third eye one time. It was unmistakably hairless. Large salamander headed Draco surveillance men have none either.

Indeed, most of the furred creatures in their ranks seem to stem from enhanced Pteroid. At one time, in conjunction with my exo-political tuition, I was shown hundreds beyond hundreds of widely differing dog-faced “humans”. Strangely, many seemed vaguely recognisable. A similar catalogue exists for the lizards. Reptilian women, I stress, will sometimes wear an equivalent of the Islamic burqa or a light chiffon veil which seems to somehow unnaturally float above the head without aid. Causal effects bring out facial features, permitting profiles to beam. Why on Earth do orthodox Jewish women wear wigs? Was this an overhang from the royal reptilian brides’ public disguise? It is said the reason Mohamed’s wives chose the burqa as attire was to make a “fashion statement”. I find that explanation and the accompanying legacy banal to the point of disbelief.

Too many contradictions and no definite answers yet, but that should give sufficient ponderable “food for thought”. There is one other viable consideration not evaluated thus far. Dozens and dozens of generations past, if the pure blood ancestors were indeed a more substantial part reptilian than normal humans, they would have likely been bestowed with special powers making them standout when compared against the other. Does not biblical Genesis state “the sons of Gods became heroes of men”? Were those related Gods reptilian Sephardim? As for explaining the hair paradox, perhaps unused to such genetic features, the mother of the original child (in our statue) personally revered the trait as a miracle and that tradition stuck. Perhaps prior to conception she felt her genes were so divine, the male would have no reproductive effect. Hassidic Jews, it must be said, do seem to come with inbuilt superiority complexes.

Next step would be to determine how we can assign character/behavioural differences that distinguish Sephardic qualities from Sirian ones. Then there is the lingering issue of the missing link.  Pleiadians seem the most likely suspect here; but they also need to be evaluated in separate terms (i.e. how do they bring the “reptilian” and the “Sirian” out as combined personalities?) for clarity of vision. Before I undertake that arduous task, it is important to substantiate whether a human being could be [sexually] attracted to a reptilian and if there is sufficient genetic compatibility to enable physical procreation. One only has to tentatively refer to “Shakespeare’s” Macbeth to form a very dim view of the “great beauty” scenario. In fact legends present “witches” as hideous as they are wicked, menacingly cackling in dank caves. Renowned for brewing “Pharmkaxia” (remember the earlier “cat” connection) potions in large black cauldrons, apparently preparing omens of the most devastating detractions, they were also able to magically transport themselves to unknown twilight destinations simply propped on household brooms (though this is as popularised, they actually each used a type of staff on the lines of biblical Moses’ celebrated model. Aladdin’s magic carpet is an intriguing variant).

Contradicting this account, I regularly read (current and historic) memoirs (sometimes providing sordid details) of human encounters with presumably “other dimensional” reptilian women and these illustrate very different profiles. Reptilian women in question are invariably noted for their transfixing charisma. To elaborate, accounts detail vivid experiences presented “in the flesh” (as it were), figures are habitually shown as magnetically attractive, supremely elegant in posture exposing the general epitome of grace. I can personally confirm a reptilian’s “waggle” would put any human woman to shame. They have an athleticism combining with aesthetic energy which tantalises an enormous surrogate power.

Far from merely left to the imagination, their acrobats can jump higher than houses without assistance

If there was anything specific I could single out as truly remarkable, it is probably the eyes. Upon first impression, they dazzle. To compare with average human, ours are dull glints matched against their melting pools. Their eyes transport them beyond any casual human beauty. This is a feature in Pleiadians too whose are relatively larger and, again, more striking than humans.  Thus, in response to my initial query on the question of attraction, I could well imagine a human king being transfixed by his reptilian female counterpart. The “genetic compatibility” factor may be harder to address. However, if we (humans) are extensively reptilian (i.e. playing on the notion that ape is a version of reptilian), I can see no reason why there would not be reproductive synergy. Perhaps the truth will emerge if science comes clean on their research of things that don’t formally exist.

Victorian era British-Jewish politician Benjamin Disraeli is attributed to have confirmed prolific Hassidic marriages into the European aristocracies. Perhaps love did factor on occasions, but I feel sure most were primarily a “means to an end”. Superficial evidence this may be, but does it provide insight as to the comparable political objectives of ancient Babylonian royal marriages? Philosophising over the clinical efficiency with which the Jews managed to infiltrate European aristocracies suggests any in place reptilian alliances with Babylonian royalty would have been just as fecund. There is another possibility.

Going further back in time, long prior to the Babylonian civilisations, were all humans intercepted by reptilians to cause genetic exchanges before the notion of leadership and monarchy came into being? Second or third generations of the original hybrids would have meant there was a very small (perhaps under a hundred individuals) contingent to manage. If this is so, living humans today would be the genetic consequence. Expanding considerations, perhaps the greater mystery is why reptilian/human partnerships haven’t stood the test of time if humanity is the legacy. Continuing this line of thinking; how would a human without direct-input “reptilian” genetics function? If the matriarchal reptilian-human is a universal product (I am impressed with the work Nikolay Levashov did on reproductive placement of chromosomes here), it would certainly explain universally distinctive character differences specifically coming out in female offspring.

To clearly sort out unmistakably human “virtues”, we need a straightforward method to distinguish Sirian qualities from reptilian ones in man. I have already discussed female mannerisms, feminine features and unique balances of judgement that separate men from women. The Gnostics used the word light to symbolise logic (or logos). Soulful emotional qualities herald from darkness and these are harboured by the quantum layer (outlined at length in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”). From a theoretical police line-up, Sirians could be very quickly and simply separated out from reptilians. The former have no social law and order, whereas the latter is obsessed in perfecting systemic infrastructure.

This is not to say Sirians are without arbitrary bodies to impose judgement on social offenders or reptilians are incapable of bucking the system. Quite the reverse is so as modern day Earth’s “Prison Planet” concept is loosely modelled on utopian Atlantis civilisation. Sirians assumed roles as royal luminaries at Atlantis, acting as the keepers of the records and fraternal judges. Considering this, remarkably, when compared to reptilians, they are not notably ethical. Indeed it could be argued ethics were alien to rule breaking Sirians. Their wider renown was for integrity and scruples that were beyond reproach. To highlight the major incompatibility; without numerous, very carefully defined strong laws to guide them, those affiliated with the Sephardim simply could not or cannot be trusted. Paradoxically, human can either follow or break regulations, depending on mood!

I mentioned Charles Hall’s “Tall Whites” in a similar context earlier. To elaborate, at a past Sydney talk of his I attended he made a number of suggestions that gave credence to the notion a link exists between them and the reptilian “Draco” hierarchy. Distinctively a short silver multi-purpose “laser pen” (that almost killed Hall) carried by them is a “standard issue” accoutrement for affiliates of an extra-dimensional cosmic police force. More importantly, expanding thoughts on how the general reptilian philosophy over ethics differs from ours, Hall mentioned his “visitors” would never trespass into a “forbidden zone” even if their lives depended on it. Herpetological insignia has been widely promoted. Memorable Draconian motifs include stylised serpents, double eagles, fleur de lys and many other faunas (in particular). Though areas generally off-limits are invariably cordoned behind indistinct barriers (sometimes invisible), they are always marked with brand logos in some way. To a human “off limits” screams too intriguing not to investigate of course. Even with the strictest warnings (sincerely outlining dangers of trespass) someone out there is always reckless enough to attempt to break in to uncover secrets.

Reptilians are very pedantic social beings. Microcosmic circles of trust dictate the interconnecting function and purpose of communities. By comparison Sirians are loyal “loners” (possibly explaining the aloofness of Pteroid). Reptilians are opportunistic manipulators. Sirians will stand by their beliefs ‘til death. Reptilians can be cautiously humble when on the losing end of a dispute. When not violently “seeing red”, they also have an extraordinary capacity for patience in aggravated circumstances. This comes out as fight or flight psychology in man (ironically something clinically blamed on the reptilian brain). Subtly similar, Sirians will act first and think about the consequences afterwards in crisis situations. Simply put, they would tend to make snap critical decisions, whereas we and the reptilians are more inclined to pontificate and procrastinate than remedy flaws, however gaping.

In some ways unsurprisingly, the clear boundary that best allocates reptilians from Sirians is the functional central nervous system (or brain). Ultimately delineated relative approaches to life can be boiled down to the application of conscience versus compassion. “Oddity” human is a collaboration of the two, although those of us that demonstrate dishonourable loyalty err towards the reptilian side. Impartial honour indicates strong Sirian traits. This would explain why that for societies without conscience, laws are absolutely vital in defining civilisation’s cooperative needs. Logic driven beings would find similar laws either patronising or insulting. Reptilians (as with humans) are part Lyran. Inherited Lyran fabled storytelling prowess may be the fuel that ignites ever present fires exploding as political melodramas in our societies. For instance, this is significantly why I believe propagandas exist. Stories bereft of truth had no place in Sirian communities. Their information was impeccable. That which did not desire political focus simply wasn’t recorded (a criticism levelled at the ancient Babylonians suggesting civilisations were either extensions of or modelled on Atlantis?).

There is another prominent difference between the Sirian and reptilian relative approaches to living which menacingly reflect in human. Sirians wallowed in fundamentalism. By comparison, possessing no capacity to be faithful, reptilians were egregious idealists (although their over-zealous observance of laws can also be a form of fundamentalism). Considering the evolution of the interpretive twisting of values that support our common word “love” serves purpose to demonstrate this catalyst well. Gnostics tried to persuade their listeners that love was a humbling before divinity and, therefore, to exude purposefully neither required idyllic settings nor reciprocation from those in vision. Under these auspices, the Gnostics directed love indiscriminately, regardless of whether efforts were welcomed or unappreciated by affected individuals. Per crude conceptual rehashing of Sirian “laws of attraction”, true love now has been bastardised into a crass symptom of passion (compassion is the derivative). This, above all other things, highlights the scurrilous reptilian nature of man.

Idealism and fundamentalism successfully came together under Pleiadian administration (in that capacity leveraging the Tamarian). They did manage to perfectly harmonise laws of attraction. However, was a like model ever to be adopted by humanity, it would generally mean intolerable repression for the masses, who would be devoid of opportunity for personal sovereignty and absent of any prospect of honest liberty. In a sense the Tamaras (“Ra” as the ultimate authority over sun cycle) is the human model. Under very different circumstances the main reason Sirians and reptilians were able to forge ahead with their joint venture cooperative technology city (currently buried under mountains of polar ice, remnants of an ancient moon the Vedas name Falla) was they shared the same ultimate civilisation goal.

Though each approached harmony (i.e. “peace”) by different means, the end always justified the journey. Intriguingly, Pleiadians religiously coveted tyrannies of happiness to effectively model their infamous communities. Accoutrements of their success on Earth remain today. So-called “Greek” relics and other structures now under oceans provided technologies that aided collective communion. Communion (“popular destiny”) is the only way to aggregate beliefs into some sort of workable group proliferation. Historically glorification of Ba’al is the best active example. Though terms may have changed, originally “Ba” stood for praise (in the sense of worship) and “Al” meant God (or Lord or master). Al-Lah compares as great or almighty God in the Atlantis version. Jewish “El” is a sloppily pronounced diphthong. Communal group channelled energy to cause deification of idols. Here fevered populism recalcitrantly locked horns with religious doctrine in the beatification of Ba’al and the establishment had to put an end to the crisis.

Differences between Sirians and reptilians are marked. The former is celebrated for original thought which apparently fuels genius qualities (something I am routinely accused of), whereas the Sephardim extend template driven replications to the limit. If it exists they can copy it. If it doesn’t exist they can fabricate a holographic simulation. Sirians remained generally distant of Atlantis societies. Tending to manifest at moments of importance or tragedy, they were perhaps regarded as something like mystic priests (when rarely observed), normally clad in plain robes and sandals (Viracochas of Mayan legends?). This is likely more evidence of the Anunaki surrogacy. Babylonian tales concur with moralist clerics addressing particular venom towards intoxication. I wonder if Jesus is an archetypal mystic hermit. The evolution of Christianity developed radical philosophies supporting communism (a derivative of communion) by the mid nineteenth century. Damning ambitions of those attached to establishment (ancestors of clerics that forbid “populist empowerment” worship of Ba’al) control agendas is why the “deflecting” socialism ruse has been gradually implemented and will become the universal tool for herding populations.

After the fall of Atlantis when most of the Sirians had evacuated Earth, reptilians gradually replaced the vacuum with their own brands of reclusive monk sects. Unfortunately the Sirians would have rebuked some of their abhorrent common practices with feverish ardour. Reptilians resonate with traditions, like to build institutions, value marked social roles and other identifiers. For instance insistence on “pink for girls” “blue for boys” typically sounds like one of their customs. Religion to them is nothing more than a tool that might be used to “socialise” human beings beneath their cultural banner. They have a great belief in the rite of passage, so tend not to indoctrinate their own young. However if there was the desire, implementation would be managed via some kind of religious methodology. That aside, humanity has significantly and effectively grown to abridge both Sirian and reptilian worlds, therefore (considering Sephardic reliance on the “Ra pact” foundation for engineered false reality)…

What impact does this have on the objectives of Anunaki hierarchies?

Factoring hereditary progeny, why did the Sirian-Anunaki surrogacy go so horribly wrong? Why was “teething” newly created human whisked off Earth just in the nick of time? Did that Sirian infiltration actually ignite the giant cosmic war of 120,000-102,000BC (guestimate figures)? Was the great flood event (circa 35,000BC) aimed at human or Neanderthal? There are other questions that need to be addressed after I re-evaluate who/what the Anunaki (group) are and, from that appraisal, draw whatever synopses are possible regards character and purpose. The title of this essay might well appear to be an odd choice given content thus far, as neither Saturn nor “influential time-lords” have actually been mentioned. Contextual relevance is about to become starkly apparent.

“Influential time-lords”, for instance, is a euphemistic reference to the Anunaki of course, but I first would like to tackle “Saturn” before I explain why. There is another connection with the Anunaki here, but it is more subtle and generally unknown. Characteristics of “Gods” supposedly worshiped by the ancients are common knowledge and much pertinent information is available for public scrutiny. Those that bother to seek will find consistency in accounts. All the established chronicles illustrate that a “lead” God either covets meteorology or the “air”. For instance Celtic deity Beelzebub presided over heavenly weather systems. Greek affairs below Zeus (Lord of the heavens) were rather more complex, but they do implicate the “theo” legacy. Akhenaton’s prime deity Amon is master of the air and everything unseen.

“Influential time-lords” relevance now palatably understood; let me introduce a different side of Saturn. I am reluctant to refer to the American agency NASA for “basis” as it produces bucket loads of deceptively malignant propagandas in support of the government’s populist brainwashing agenda. However, details released about Saturn’s satellite view firmament are so strikingly accurate they deserve tribute. The famous rings may arguably be composed of water (isn’t this a sign of life?), ice, rocks and dust, but they (and I quote) also have a “remarkable effect on weather systems”. Thinking of possibilities (considering that Saturn is not the only ringed “gas planet”), if I wanted to create a cosmic calling card (if you will) that identified with the Ouroboros, well, I don’t imagine I could do better than Saturn.

Continuing this line of thought whilst erring on the side of the positive, of all the places in the cluttered cosmos, Saturn seems an ideal location for a God of Meteorology. Weather systems are only “arbitrary” because scientists theorise this is so. The same scientists theorise an obviously designed universe is evidence of “randomness”, so I tend to take what they assert with “big pinches of salt. Anyway, I can’t say for certain, but I would hazard a massively plausible calculation that Saturn acts as stronghold host to the Anunaki. Sit tight, because there’s more. If we can authoritatively rely on this presumption, logic becomes fascinating.

Before I resolve how everything “connects up”, here is a little more historic background. According to Babylonian myths the Anunaki left Earth in a huff immediately after trying to wipe out “constantly chattering” man with a giant flood. Slavic folklore that possibly “fits” may refer to an event that is believed to have created the Russian Black Sea. Another is an extraordinary weather incident that apparently opened a new water way which covered (what now is) Northern Africa and sections of the Middle East. Unfortunately existent physical evidence could only be classed as “circumstantial” today (notwithstanding the Sphinx’s mysterious “water erosion”) mainly because waters rapidly subsided over few centuries to leave vegetative marshlands in their wake. A lush, wet paradise region persisted for an excessive period afterwards.

Was this the hubris of Eden?

Personally, I favour the latter (North African flood) event reflects the Anunaki outburst as remarkably large Neanderthals were located there at the time. Dates I have mentioned before (circa 35,000BC) and shortly after the dramatic exit, Atlantis Sirians “returned” with human clans in tow from Mars to settle in paradise. Was this the original Promised Land or “Eden” (Aden is a modern day country of that region)? It would have been located in the heart of today’s Middle East, perhaps Israel even! My inadvertent mention of an inner Earth Eden in prior articles suggests a contradiction here. Though it does appear so on face value, I can now confirm more than one (perhaps each pronounced slightly differently) Eden or Edin location. The identifiers of the Promised Land could well have used Eden as its namesake, particularly if name usage was generally synonymous with paradise.

Potentially referring to the Anunaki, I am constantly perplexed by those “dark” Earth energy fields exposed in Zoroastrian philosophies. This reflectively lends me to favour that religious doctrine is much more ancient than postulated through conventional historic analysis. Tainted evil territory would surely refer to promiscuous effects of the Anunaki as the most probable candidate. If this is so then origins of Zoroastrianism seem destined to predate 35,000BC as that is when the Anunaki “vacated Earth” according to folklore. The problem is very few (if any) humans existed on Earth prior (evidenced by the lack of skeletal remains?) as most would have returned with the Martian Sirians after the Anunaki exodus. In which case, the underlying purpose behind Zoroastrian instruction remains a perplexing mystery. Could, by chance, have chroniclers been light on information and failed to observe precise terms of the Anunaki exit? If there had been a transitional ascension instead then plausibility might allow the placement of a much later date on affairs that vilify Zoroastrian traditions. Has Anunaki influence over man merely been minimised since 35,000BC?

Parried against the Almighty, Anunaki are very minor Gods. Accordingly the Saturn spectacle is only visibly ever-present for residents of the local star system. That presence coordinates weather which goes some way towards demonstrating they are the precise same Gods the ancients chronicled. Additionally, in Robert Morning Sky’s “Terra Papers”, extra-terrestrial visitor Bek-ti informs us that the fundamental functional purpose of a God is “to be worshiped” which would cordially correspond with the need to be spectacular. At some point the Anunaki clearly saw benefit in colonising other planets and this would have prepared their move to Earth. Formally (according to again circumstantial ancient sources) they initially operated in partnership with Sirians.

I place a “best guess” chronological figure of this liaison around 500,000 years ago (admittedly summarily inspired somewhat by Gilgamesh’s epic), but I could be way off the mark here (given that numbers of stone tablets detailing the famous “Kings’ List” are possibly permanently “lost’). Genetic compatibility may have been correct, but it did not promote successful surrogacy. In fact the heavenly conceptual alliance morphed into a practical fiasco. Morally biased Sirians simply would not go through with aspects of the role that fell short of their approval. Unfortunately, the list of detractors was so long many key ambitions of the Anunaki were simply ignored. This left them between a proverbial rock and a hard place, quite literally stranded without bodies, though spurious later arrangements with the Draco (implied in the capture of Inanna [Venus] saga) possibly remedied failings of the Sirians – something I will reflect on towards the conclusion of this essay.

It certainly seems most probable that Anunaki visitation and attempted rule over Earth replicated efforts on Saturn. Saturn sounds a lot like “Satan”. So much so, some posit that Saturn is in fact a mispronunciation of Satan (also incidentally known as the Blessed Star). I have gone to some length to expose the errors defining gross misinformation that distorts the iconic star’s reputation in other writings. Summarily, the problem is this. There were two separate, very different scenarios that have been confused for one another over time. The Satan star worked to distribute white light which eventually formed seven “heavenly” dimensions. Overwhelming pressure from “left behind” extraneous matter (subsequently composing two black dimensions) that was initially “blocked” by Satan but ended up building to such an extent; it collapsed the virtuous star (i.e. this event is colloquially known as “the fall”, something science  routinely refers to as a “black hole” occurrence).

Hardly denoting the transcription of all evil (unless “evil” here is a cover for goodness), Sat-an in Sanskrit literally means “Almighty God above truthful purity”. Quite the reverse is so, I think, therefore here’s my suggestion. Could a very different Satan have been the poor pronunciation of Saturn? Did, over time, the negative connotations of both terms become so indistinguishably engrained they effectively “fused” as one?

In the modern age of rationalism, the importance of mood is largely overlooked. Though I question whether they truly parry with each of the heavenly dimensions, Gnostics attempted to describe Almighty God in terms of fundamental states, such as “grace” and “nobility”. This is not evidence of cultural insanity. Rather, embroiled philosophies are so seriously objective; they are very hard to understand by those trapped under spell of rationalism. For example, in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, I describe how certain atomic formations might influence an object (e.g. take the stigma attached to a mountain range such as Dylatov Pass) to such a degree it exudes “character” in the form of positive or negative vibes (professionally exploited by Hammer Horror movies, I would emphatically imagine).

Suffice to say, there is much that humanity doesn’t (or refuses to) comprehend regards the meta-functional purpose of existence. Could the Anunaki, in situ on Earth, have unwittingly caused such memorable turmoil for us then that prophet Zoroaster felt obliged to warn his brethren? Under Sirian surrogacy, one would have imagined the Anunaki’s great priority would have been to place Saturn in popular focus in order to ramp up committed worshiper conversion rates. There’s no point in putting mesmerising rings on Saturn for no one to witnesses them. Slavic-Thracian etymology conclusively conceptualises Yahweh as a grim reaper figure. Regularly occasioned in biblical folklore, was usage “consistent” and does it always refer to the same basic entity (such as the Anunaki)?

Human, tradition infers, was genetically unauthorised (because we possessed mindsymbolised as knowledge). This angered Yahweh who wrathfully banished us from the Garden of Eden. Did (in this instance) Yahweh association with “the Anunaki” imply the “Garden of Eden” is the whole ofconfigurative Earth”? Human’s mind capacitor (knowledge generation the side effect) is the cerebral cortex and this is a definite Sirian asset. That could have led to a cosmic war generated by parties that saw human evolution as a potentially devastating existential threat. It would also explain why the Sirians stepped in to save humanity. Factoring in their passion for freedom and unrequited truth; it seems to me that perhaps Anunaki objectives would be regarded as far from “fair” when pitched against those lofty standards. For instances, had they have chosen to apply cunning in place of logic to cultivate order in the form of political “wins”, decorum impresses me that the Sirians could under no circumstance have supported their desired existence.

Humans admire trustworthiness even if we (as individuals) ourselves are not very trustworthy. Because clever authoritarian institutions cast the impression that laws provide “freedom” (or freedoms – I never did appreciate the plural use of that word), people accept indirect tyranny because it is not “in the face”. Perhaps Anunaki determination to proliferate their unrequited “needs” also turned out to be dramatically unyielding, causing conflicts with personal interests of infinitely inferior human being. Regardless of “gains” from the connection, such as inexplicably heightened individual power, perhaps that overt oppression fostered extremely negative sentiment against the Gods. Is that the basis for the “evil Satan” (aka Saturn) confusion that haunts today’s ever willingly gullible populaces? As an aside, it would be good to know how much Sephardic malpractice has backed off that tradition.

Reporting on one of her many publicised conversations with a red dragon, Eva Draconis once presented a vital off-the-cuff remark which stated (to the effect) that all (bar none) of the pope’s cardinals are Draco “assets”. Clearly the Sephardim have an imperious agenda too and this is currently being administered by the Catholics (via the United Nations, whose manifesto exudes hybridised Theosophical philology) under terms of Zionism (aka “globalism”). In this context, impending human ascension (I have discussed many times before) is at centre stage. Probably the most important question in review of the transition (if it happens) concerns power sharing arrangements that, due to expanded corresponding dimensional bandwidth, would permit Anunaki direct involvement in human affairs again. How will their style of demagogue despotism conflict against maintained reptilian tyranny? Interestingly, Babylonian annuls record various royal marriages between Draco queens (possibly Antrutinram, Tressuntbaa and Tamutakbu) and the Anunaki.

What are the implications?

Ignoring the plausible consequence of a reoccurrence of all-but-forgotten satanic (Saturn) cultural programming by the Anunaki, does this suggest any new role for the Sephardim will merely act as corrupt backstop to enable their grand destiny plans? The conduit was opened through Ba’al before. There is another rather more disconcerting potential symptom from this that deserves explicit configuration. From the Anunaki perspective, was humanity deliberately created as a way to bridge Sirian and reptilian nature as a “complete” entity in order to calculate a more compatible future host? Time-lords see past present and future simultaneously. This ironically places an even bigger question mark as to which angry God “Yahweh” really represents. Before the Sirians separated from the Anunaki, they were an equal part of the divine serpent (existentially, the human kundalini is lowest manifestation of the caduceus [Moses’ staff?] and that is why Sephardic “Ciakars” connect via chakra points). The forlorn attempt to rekindle original status failed because possessed Sirians lacked desired reptilian qualities. Here’s why I said “ironically” before. Could “angry Yahweh” symbolically represent “Sirian” but only in relation to the aspect creation of human? (I.e. God here simultaneously banished and rescued mankind)

Reptilian qualities would be essential to permit limited corruption under “reasonable circumstances”. In this context, human would make a much more “balanced” reptilian/Sirian hybrid (per outlined Anunaki goals). We have values but are sometimes equally corrupt in the way we apply them. Vitally, from the genetic engineering perspective, our magnificent cerebral cortex would surely class as the living piece de resistence of materialism. Proportionally Sephardic, all humans are also tainted with alien (Lyran and possibly others) DNA. If ancient Babylonian texts are accurate, was the reason for Anunaki marriage into Draco ranks primarily motivated by potential remedies for genetic unity complications? The Anunaki could not have been certain that extraneous alien content wouldn’t disaffect future surrogacy plans without initially testing compliance. Prior, they presumed related Sirian compounds would work and paid heavily for the complacency.

I discussed Ra occultism at some length last article which included the proposition that the Anunaki currently govern our sun by proxy. Additionally, in confirmation of the “Inanna” (Venus) underworld myth, cosmic sources have validated knowledge that they presided over an experiment to convert populations that live in the heart of Venus. Though I am not aware of any publication, the main purpose behind Venusian Valiant Thor’s hapless attempts at brokering arrangements with the United States government in the 1950’s coincided with an Earth comparative breakdown of social order at his home planet. There is some kind of very strange life system inside Mercury and this may well be an Anunaki project too.

The point I am trying make here is their manifest ranges should be regarded as “cosmic forces” rather than anything that might be remotely compared to tangibly “bodied individuals” (even configured as the many forms of Ba’al). Indeed, the Vedic cobra with a thousand heads metaphor indicates the Anunaki might simultaneously occupy legions of people if that was their objective desire. Some entities swallow up entire planets for breakfast, such is their range.  Nevertheless, occupation of a star is a whole different facilitation category. My book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” emphasises all planets are encased stars. There is a world of disparity between “closed” planets and “open” physical stars. Physical stars are expressively multi-functional gateways. One function is to preside over times (time, generally misunderstood by conventional science, is a cosmic “script” that “hovers” in a standalone dimension providing the basis for everything that exists or doesn’t exist via atomic “calibrations” or astral projections). Consequentially, any cosmic force that assumes star governance status is a time-lord as well.

Here’s the danger. Should they choose to do so; time-lords can repackage existence in such a way that it alters the cosmic flow of chronology. Only those situated in “impartial containment” might discern changes (with consistent time). For the experiencer, for the barely conscious human, time is nothing more than a reflective effect of perception. Perception, attached to this environment, supersedes all other considerations. Whereas it might possible (for human) to stand back from perception, so few seem to have the latent ability it is pointless for me to dwell on the consequence. Instead, I must bitterly conclude that humans (unmovably reliant on illusory reality) are physically unable to decipher time shifts (beyond spectacularly illogical ones that defy anticipated continuity).

That, thus far, ends my quest. Nevertheless, (I feel) If this essay is to be remembered as enigmatic writing, it would be good to finish things off with a few “poignant” unanswered queries to keep my audience keen. Readers choosing to volunteer active roles in the discovery tour are cordially welcome provide interesting (but please, nothing crass) feedback in the comments section too. So, without further ado, I’ll start the ball rolling with three unresolved topics (that perhaps one day will kick off separate future research projects).

If the Anunaki are able to alter chronologies of any timeline attached to their cosmic stream, how might this impact humanity when we ascend into a dimensional frequency compatible with their bandwidth?

The next part is rather more challenging. It concerns the complexly unenviable position of the Sephardim in relation to our ascension. How will the transition affect them? To note, perhaps the ascension is the most compelling reason for their ongoing visceral attempts to halt human DNA progression, including establishing numerous resonating “so-called” frequency fences (via the false matrix) and their commissioning of the dramatically disastrous Philadelphia Experiment. I have highlighted details of this operation before. In brief, Zeta hybrids were commandeered as “brains” in an attempt to disconnect Earth from the sun’s direct magnetic field. If it had worked the sun would no longer be “visible”. Instead, ramped up moon generated sunlight (recalibrated to exact Draco specifications) would have “looped” with Earth causing mankind to be totally under the spell of the Sephardim. Does this highlight their reticence to “trust” infinitely superior time-lords?

Does the Draconians’ False (Light) Matrix Leverage off the Ancient Atlantis Tamarian?

Standard
Does the Draconians’ False (Light) Matrix Leverage off the Ancient Atlantis Tamarian?

Doubtlessly many visitors here are now aware that I conduct live “light DNA” sessions via Skype. These are dedicated to pinpointing deep historic, likely extra-terrestrial origins of those that seek my advice. Established clients connect using a variety of mediums other than Skype. Some liaise with me regularly; others less frequently. One client in particular has presented many dream sequences (for me to decode). Responses are part of the continuous improvement effort and are not a feature of paid consultancy. She (the client) is invariably taken aback (and perhaps sometimes a little disappointed) by my interpretations. That is because prognoses are always pragmatic and down to Earth, as they should be. Needless to say, the causal effect rather underwhelms exquisite Sephardic (invariably dream influencing culprits) cultural fantasy that commonly obsessively overstates medieval traditions, complete with wizards, dragons, shining knights, maidens in distress and other lesser known trappings of that bygone era. Even so I am occasionally delivered news items so critical, it would be remiss of me not to expand the discovery tour with vigour and dedication for my universal audience.

One such titbit was received near the throes of completion of my last expansive writing project, or I thought it was complete at the time. The information was in fact so potent; it not only radically changed the structure of what I had planned to deliver prior (adding three extra weeks to the production cycle), but became the inspiration for this article too. It is fortunate that my interpretive skills are usually impeccable; because invariably messages from the other side are so distorted, either through general cultural incompatibility or a lack of empathetic resonance (I will discuss “empathy” separately later), that lesser mortals might sanely classify findings as “gobbledegook”. Perhaps my sources of feedback are unique to me, perhaps they are everywhere. All I can say is, I have some way (that I honestly cannot fathom) of interpreting “time” in raw state. Data, as served, is (how can I describe this?) “fixed” and, thus, extraordinarily hard to negotiate within the faculties of standardised perception. In effect, my route takes me to “the summary” of “everything”. That’s past, present and future combined as an unwieldy clump. This light vacuum (clump) is called many things, but I prefer to use the term “inherence” in cordial discussions. It could be said that it is there but not there at the same time.

My client (that delivered the message) understood she had been given her sensational truth by “Pleiadians”. This is remotely important and I will elaborate on reasons at the correct juncture. As presented, her terminology did not make any contextual sense to me or, at least, I instinctively felt that was the case then. The word she offered me was “tamaras”. Any keen eye will observe the tell-tale Anunaki “S” gives away a likely Sephardic signature rather than denoting the “plural” form or some other exotic declension. Upon first glance it seems like the vaguely recognisable (though unknown to humans) Atlantis motto tamarian. Dissimilar to English, all syllables or parts that build Atlantis words mean something individually. Group values are expansions or contextual extensions of individual meanings. If I take the English word “mailing” as the example, it can be broken in two to reveal a “verb stem” mail complimenting the “suffix” ing. Beyond telling the receiver what type of verb is being used, “ing” has no individual meaning. Thus, there are no conceptual similarities in Atlantean grammar because if “ing” was present it would need to individually mean something.

Tamaras can be broken into ta-ma-ra-s and each part naturally refers to something. My client’s interpretation of correct translation is vague, so I must return to the drawing board and approach the determination to comprehend as a detective hunts for clues from unknown “sources” to piece together a formal picture of evidential truth. My limited knowledge of ancient scripts (such as Sanskrit) is enough to glean sibylic meanings might vary so greatly, depending on how they were pronounced, a cornucopia of possibilities might thwart my efforts. Nevertheless, the honest sleuth would be able to configure an appropriate logical connection between all pieces of grouped words (such as tamaras) even from a haystack of options. “Ta” [in this instance] would need to contextually “fit” with all the other parts of tamaras to be the correct translation version of the varied possibilities.

My last writing project made a cameo out of a hypothetical Pharisee engineered plot implicating the utopian objective of controlling humanity under the banner of “Zionism”. Some symmetry may be gleaned from Sirian articulation of “justice”, so there will likely be several crossovers here. Indeed, the biblical “tower of Babel” metaphor amply demonstrates the whims of those that devote themselves to developing the interests of Zionism. Sirians at least gave the unclean “options”. Though banishment from the citadel was to precede a harsh life in the wilderness for years on end, it was better than the “living death” offered today. Our Sirian-reptilian partnership has proven to be a dangerous one. It brought down Atlantis so who would dare think otherwise? The modern “living death” condition was highlighted in my last article. Its powerful message should be contemplated deeply (it is that which is “between the lines” that shines):

“Unlike hypotheticals monstrously resurrected to become living satires by our kangaroo courts, I make no prejudgement here”

Societies have evolved into an epitome of preconceptions under synthetic regulations. To judge “on merit” is to honour. Unconditional prejudgement is a symptom of frivolous cowardice. Those devoid of any integrity choose this path. If presumptions are to be made, they must be done with fair basis to be of honourable intent, for perpetual reasoned logic blazes the avenues leading towards righteousness. Therefore we have to take care we are able to isolate preconceptions. Interpretive issues, particularly when overzealously trying to stress desired results, can easily escalate into the manufacture of falsehoods. It should be duly noted that old “basis” can and will distort new balance sheets. For instance, prior to even thinking of how to address this article, I had in mind the bare faced assumption that the Draco had somehow “defiled” that which is possibly the greatest of all ancient Atlantis legacies.  As the Draco is generally given a very negative press (something I will muse over later), it is understandable that I might occasionally (albeit inadvertently) lose grip of sound intellectual discipline. I initially erred but, given my foolish subservience to popular distortion, what’s particularly annoying in this case is the answer was right under my very nose if I had bothered to inspect the detail carefully right at the start.

I had not merely been offered a solitary bland Atlantis motto, but two very different scintillating connotations that begged for my dedicated interpretation.  After applying myself, the result was better than I could have possibly dreamt of in my wildest imagination. I had been presented the cause of all wars. “Tamaras” and “tamarian” may well look similar, but conceptual meanings are so radically different they are almost opposites. For comprehension, we must first evaluate the true relevance of the pioneering work of the great Pharaoh Akhenaten. Naturally, the real legacy of Akhenaten is so important that past evil forces have obscured anything of note from view. Censored fragments have been constructed in such a way as to distort original messages into irrelevance. Only those with access to the Akashic Records might discern fact from hapless fiction. One unlikely truth has stood the test of time though.

To the Pharisees’ dismay, historians’ consensus often favours Akhenaten’s invention of a uniform omnipresent God. Evidence of that discovery can be found in all common religious philosophies concerning the “oneness of existence”. But die-hard Pharisees still bluster ignorantly about the power of their YHWH creature (and its “unlikely” Greek etymology). The great Pharaoh knew the truth and the truth delivered us (phonetically) A-mon (although English prayer verses traditionally end A-men). Conceptually preceding Atlantis folklore “An” (A- being shorthand) has always represented the “shell” of the Almighty God. Remarkably, Babylonian annals (that roughly compare with the Jewish holy Talmud or divinely inspired oral record) are called “mo’ed”. With respect to “mo’s” positioning within “A-n”, I determine that Akhenaten (who may have lived in a much more distant past era than makes for popular conjecture) was referring to manifest spiritually as accorded by holy prosperity. The metaphor (Amon) reads something like this.

Break open the shell and you will find true divinity

Amon may have been the envy of contemporary elites seeking enlightenment, but this would have meant nothing to ordinary folks alien to intellectual passion. They needed spirit only as this is always enough to ensure the following of precise orders (doctrines) “from above”. When divine arbiters turn out in reality to be selfishly corrupt politicians, then all sorts of malfeasance can result. Even so, prosperity informs us the spirit that partners with Amon is normally called “Re” (which is an improper transliteration). Instead, it should be inscribed as “Ri” and pronounced in the same way “ray” (i.e. ray of light) is expressed in English. It highlights an essential fact. The downfall and subsequent murder of Akhenaten (whose missing body is still held by the Draco “in stasis”) coincided with a raging philosophical battle between worshippers of Amon-Ri and “Ra” (prominent sun God) occultists. Babylonian sun-worship was later rebranded Sol Invictus by the Romans sympathetic to pharisaic causes. Unsurprisingly it is the inspiration behind the Illimunati splinter aptly termed “Babylonian Brotherhood” (to which ex American President George W Bush is allegedly a recruit).

Sol Invictus (under Constantine) would assume the basis for cultural interpretation of Christianity in its final rebrand as Catholicism, so (obscured) sun-worship impacts the lives of a significant percentage of modern day populaces. In order to elevate his cult, Constantine purged all Gnostic texts that obstructed his mission. Original Druid mystery schools have been rendered obsolete (although some of that deep knowledge can be found in sections of the Jewish Kabbalah). The heinous tradition of censorship has not ceased. Dead Sea Scrolls and other significant parchments have been vetted as to not ruffle status-quo (in my opinion). Even so, a clear move away from materialistic values makes the Nag Hamadi texts essential reading. Whereas the rather obvious attempts to censor purity makes evidence against the uniform Pharisees’ cause seem “vague”, tenets of truth are impossible to blemish (ultimately availing the dedicated and allowing universal purpose to shine). Logos has not been promoted in vain and those with determination and presence of mind will find their Holy Grail.

It is no irony that the distinctive essential difference between tamaras and tamarian is found in the conflict remonstrating pedestrian belief in overt (physical) “Ra” which is opposed to the comparatively unpopular sympathetic demystification of covert (metaphysical) “Ri”. To fully appreciate how things came to be as they were in Atlantis times and as they are now, precise understanding of how the cosmos “works” is a prerequisite. Indeed, the great tyranny administered by superficial leaders ever since the fall of Atlantis is deliberately in place to confuse the masses as to what the true, purposeful properties of the heavens and underlying existences are. There is no better example to be found to signify how prominent roles were “forgotten” than by valid conceptualisation of critical philosophic differences between “Ra” and “Ri” even though some (given their programing by forces of evil) might correctly (from the empirical standpoint) argue each is “the same thing”. Others approaching the question with sensitivity would more precisely determine that “Ra” is a spiritual abomination because any perceived consolidation with divine “Ri” simply is not true. Is the sauce bottle edible? Ra has always been the device that delivers (i.e. “the deliverer”) Ri.

How am I to signify the momentous contextual differences between Ra and Ri “in laymen’s terms” in a fashion that might be appreciated universally?

The best way to start I think is to reference my last article again. That discussed various adjustments that both separated and coordinated body and mind. Here it might be observed that Ra represents the “body” of God, whereas Ri acts as divine “mind”. In that capacity, our sun (which is possibly a transplant several times removed) assumes Ra’s structured identity. Seasoned researchers should already be aware stars are not arbitrary (and otherwise useless) “inanimate objects” that happen to light our skies (in the atheistic sense). In cosmic terms, each star is a living entity no matter what the perceived status. Things actually become slightly more complicated when comprehension is tested to the limit, because each enormous orb can reproductively expand to form giant “family” networks that cover what might seem impossibly large catchment areas. Every network becomes and is an “entity” in its own right. Some networks are able to group together (assimilation and not “survival” is the fundamental principle of universal existence) and these galaxies can literally accommodate thousands of stars.

As I outline in my book The Beauty of Existence Decoded, stars fulfil the need to grow and (therefore) reproduce like any other entity.   The method they use is sadly conventional and closely copies our fungi spooring processes (or is that the other way round?). Therefore it could be said an individual sun is the equivalent of a “cell” or even a “particle” that collaborates with others to collectivise in order to become a functional body. Therefore, to call any individual cell (i.e. Ra) “the body” is nothing short of dishonesty. Capping off occultist distortion of values, in Ra’s case the roles and purposes of heavenly bodies have been so overlooked (or, rather, grotesquely twisted to suit interests of religious miscreants), they are virtually conceptually unknown. I find it ironic that the supposedly faithful have no effective parameters to refer to that will quench any thirst for raw spirituality.

Similar to the pyramidal hierarchy that is the human body, the divine mind needs a physical asset “to be” (and express itself – true “causality”). When Ra is presumed to “control” material functionality, truth has been turned inside out. The body is nothing more than a very useful vehicle. Thus Ra (in the context of sun worship) is actually evidence of the denial of mind’s role (an atypical symptom of rationalistic atheist materialism) in cognitive performance. This and other mysterious effects are the metaphysical property of spiritual domains. Consequentially, everything that thinks has a conscience-of-sorts. The mind is not illusory steam. Indeed, the reverse is so for after brain service ceases, the mind carries on. Conscious being is eternal whereas the body and all its parts are a semblance tuned to a specific dimensional paradigm.

It needs no great detective to deduce the Ra concept is something the Pharisees would greatly appreciate. Did not Moses begin the conquest to undermine God’s spirituality when he issued the original “commandments”? In addition to their bias towards stockholders, all ten either encourage denial of truth or open deceit. His “God” seems to expect compliance in the same way medieval torturers “validated” confessions. Though it has not been historically confirmed (largely due to that grand legacy of misinformation), it would not surprise me if it turned out that, prior to the formulation of Judaism, the Pharisees were the original usurpers directly after the fall of Atlantis. Were these the “Hyksos” (reinvented as Babylonian dynasts in the “official” historic account) or some other version attached to the Varangian Guard? Incorporating Akhenaten’s “universal God” into their folklore was more than theft. The Jewish YHWH judgemental aberration is devoid of conscience. It is pitched as the ultimate authority for authority’s sake. The “cause” has promoted doctrines that are as childish and spiteful as they are desperately unfair. No wonder man, according to religious texts, appears so much more eloquent and morally just than the remotely holy.

Jealous, selfish man would not exceed expectation was he to be classed as a spiritual imp. Yet he dares to dictate to God?

The Pharisees ignore and deny the essence of God. All manners of evidence to the effect can be sought in our material sciences, nominal religious dogmas and the endless commercial-political conspiracy designated to prepare slaves. Ri is the glue that binds existence, but spirituality also inhibits the Pharisee’s cause. Nevertheless, comprehension of the censored astral is critically important if the Atlantis tamarian concept is to be appreciated. There is no representation for spiritual glue in the word “tamaras” and for good reason. On face value tamaras is the product of manipulators that desire to use the shell (Ra) as their icon for control. It goes without saying that the tamaras must fashionably double as that which is colloquially known as the “False [light] Matrix”. Albeit the former signifies philosophic intent and the latter refers to proto-physical infrastructures, they are the same. In relation to the tamarian however, all concepts leverage off the same basic identify framework in different ways.

Fortunate for us Atlantis expressions “evolve” and we can clearly see tamaras and tamarian have shared components. Therefore once we are able to decode all syllables as individual standalone words, we will be in a stronger position to impress plausible grouped meanings that contextually rely on all parts. This quest needs some vital background before we embark. For instance, our contemporary sciences’ impotence regarding cosmic matters will reflect poorly on findings (i.e. findings will likely contradict or defy mainstream opinion). Scientists’ errors are so widespread that everything particularly very small or very big is disaffected. The removal of Stephen Hawkins will change nothing. In my protest, I see no purpose in attempting to benchmark findings under error to be “politically correct”, so I rightly ignore whimsical physicists. Atoms, I reveal in The Beauty of Existence Decoded, are universal catalysers. In that capacity, all the components of dimensional frequency configurations are simultaneously generated within “time windows”. No quantum theory has come close to unravelling the “mystery” behind the truth beyond string and superstring “anticipations”.

This must be appreciated before broaching the discovery tour as the tamaras and the tamarian equally leverage off the quantum layer; which is (contrary to mainstream physics opinion) an infinite ultra-manifest mesh that does much more than merely completing existence. All atoms must be suitably matched to connect which, by that determination, excludes “nothing”. There is an illusory void which satisfies the requirement to punctuate the dynamics of electro-magnetism but true “nothingness” is not part of existence and that is why neither tamaras nor tamarian make mention of it. The quest to decode terms has not been straightforward by any means. My reticence to benchmark findings against flawed, bloviating sciences also removes consistency, so I have to be careful. Terms have proved impossible to compare against anything that categorically justifies their correctness. Even so intuitive faith will provide logos when administered sincerely.

The legacy that was the Atlantis language has been completely lost (or perhaps violated) and this is why historians “question” the very existence of associated ancient civilisations. Was it not for Plato, I wonder if anyone would bother even to hunt for mythical lands. Thus all I can confirm (from inherent truth sources) is the peoples of Atlantis used numerous scripts (as is the way today) because they originated from different locations and cultures. However meanings were congruous because only one language free of dialects was synthesised by the numerable occasioned alphabets, so oral “Chinese” could be understood by English and Ethiopians alike. Scripts represented the sole common language. It was only after the fall of Atlantis that cultural divergence led to the erosion of prior common word meanings and scripts became contextual languages in their own right. This breakdown is “celebrated” by the Pharisees under auspices of the “Tower of Babel” account in the Bible. Their unsung great coup was to manufacture universal ignorance amongst men with the view to ultimately groom “world leaders” in their image.

Earthly sources have fortunately (and perhaps a little fortuitously) shed some light on our conundrum (i.e. how to decode two unknown and erstwhile obsolete Atlantis concepts?). Unbeknownst to common ancestors, many modern day languages with deep historic origins still maintain a little of the magnificence of the former great civilisation. Logic persuaded that answers would be found in Sanskrit, yet fate had other plans for me. By a strange coincidence, the syllables I needed to translate were remarkably alive and well. Everyday notations of missing parts were present in Maori tribal scripts. Cultural meanings only needed to be slightly adjusted to bring clarity to the discovery quest. Perhaps this New Zealand coincidence is not as startling as might be first considered. The Maoris were the only nationals that effectively stood up against the tyranny of [British] Imperialists. That legacy is fearsomely coveted by modern populations as it should be.

There were no isolated syllable “stand alone” meanings to be found. By example, tapu (ta-pu) is a sacred ceremonial dagger. “Ta” to my frustration always seemed to be connected to other components (such as “pu” in tapu’s case). I feel sure that Sanskrit might reveal unembellished values for all syllables, but I have no more than a quaint appreciation of the language. Even so, there is a good broad base to work from and I have also collected some obvious “foundation stones”. We have already reviewed “Ra” and “Ri” at some length. “An” (almighty God) is another. Explanations need to work “individually” and within “group formats”. Therefore “Ta” in likely correct context would mean “sacred”. “Ma” similarly converts to “life force”. Emphasised earlier, “S” implies the wave or flowing current of existence (sometimes metaphorically expressed as “oceans of space”). It further marks the divide of Yin Yang. According to Robert Morning Sky, ‘S” was the most ancient representation of what I regularly term “Anunaki”.

It is interesting that the Hebrews (under the Pharisees) dropped traditional “An”, replacing it with the abomination YHWH. Understandably (given the Pharisees’ puppet status below the Sephardim) An is also missing from “tamaras” and this should be enough to propose a definite link between Ra occultists, the Pharisees “laid bare” and those reptilian master planners that cautiously offered my student “advice” correlating with the theme of this essay. Pharisees’ (or “those who censor truth”) blasphemy doctrine attempts to abolish (or, at best, deny) manifest spirituality (“Ri”). YHWH is painted as a mortally biased, divisively unfair despot, because so are they too. In adjunct to their distortion of order, nature’s cycles are deemed to precipitate plausibly measurable patterns or, to put it a better way, cycles must conform to man’s mathematical calculations defining “responsible thresholds”. When this is not so, religious malfeasants sympathetic to the Pharisees’ utopian cause determine God (i.e. nature is merely an “extension” of Ra’s body) has been “infected by forces of evil” (because God himself “cannot err”).

Why does the fact Sun worshipers revelling in the cycle of life followed dreadful (pointless) superstitions (such as blood sacrifices) when cycles appeared to “break” shock? A Catholic Priest can still conduct an “exorcism” today. How is that any different? We may well currently have an atheist-materialist “globalism” culture superimposed over everything else, but modern day Pharisees are identical (in character) to prominent historic memories of them. Times have changed yes, but attitudes are still as rotten as ever. The Sephardim (guides to my student) love to lever ignorance particularly when encapsulated by “rationalism” (i.e. error or “babble” is formularised as proto “truth”). Superstitions, peculiarly potent in this current stale faux science state of apathy, make absolutely brilliant decoys to parasite off. The best ones to manipulate are those that “believe” they know it all. Widely publicised, I agree that the balance of “life energy” is very important to our invisible overseers, but I do not necessarily concur with popular prognoses for motive.

For instance, the psychotic imposition of “paedophilia” as the root of all evil is an obvious reptilian measure against humanity. It is a psy-op that leverages off the guilt and greed of motherhood. They want to cultivate an impotent youth. That’s their motive. Mothers desire unrequited power, so the psy-op is a brilliant manoeuvre and a “win/win”. To cap it off reptilians have been able to cultivate harmless, moronic human slave populations that are so whimsically spineless they support their tyrannous leaders austere agenda with open arms. Down trodden young are the easiest to influence. Once traditions are set, they are almost impossible to shake. George Orwell remarked on how quickly intellectuals were ready to fall under McCarthy’s fake communism “threat” (one of many successful attempts made to prohibit reason). Nothing has changed. In fact the state of deceit has soured to such a degree that scientists and other so-called “professionals” leave their ethics and integrity at the work gate. Reptilian will to win (“survival”) has sacrificed dignity.

The covert conflict between tamaras and tamarian has converted to human civilisations and this predetermines the prevalence towards “will to win”. Up to this point, I have only outlined meanings of each part of the two concepts.  Once full understanding is complete, evolution of human history and its underlying course of clandestine manipulation will become clearer. In that regard, put as simply as possible, tamarian literally translates as “the sacred life force which is the divine will of almighty God”. Tamaras, it could be said devalues this message in the following way “the sacred life force is the image of God which is represented by the exalted manifestation (Anunaki)”. In other words, Ra sun [God] is an idol which is the image of the Anunaki. Per these terms, illusory reality assures the life force is made “sacred” by simply manifesting. In the most contradictory fashion, the tamarian espouses true life force cannot be solid. It is something on the lines of “the mind” and the reason this is sacred is it upholds “God’s will” (or desire).

It could be argued that the tamaras implies the “physical” is the extent of everything or “God in being” (Elohim) even though it is a flexible feature of atomic frequency calibration, whereas the tamarian fails to acknowledge the relevance of “illusory existence” beyond fulfilling the instance of God’s will. This is why the Gnostics (who attempted to preserve Atlantis folklore, symbolised by the fish which represents Pleiadian Oannes) expressed creation in such alien terms. Mundane science is all but forfeited in the casting of non-physical states (majestic, graceful and so on) as the root cause behind prolific generation of “open” logical or emotional responses depending on situated “needs”. Per that equation, physical clutter has the dual metaphorical role of constantly amplifying meta-physical purpose.

Before I expose the prank the Sephardim have played on humanity’s insolence, it would best to explain what is truly meant by “the sacred life force which is the divine will of almighty God”. Beyond crass iconography and accompanying superstitions, “God” is sorely absent from general religious vision. I won’t dwell on the obvious, but what is important is God’s absence reinforces belief in superstitions (regularly tailored to suit group “agendas”) in those that are gullible enough to succumb to fantasies under the misconstrued objective of being “faithful” (i.e. I tell you something and, for you to be “faithful”, you must unconditionally believe what I say without adequate supporting evidence or provocation). There is a concrete reason for God’s supposed absence that would stun habitual atheists. There is also valid rhyme as to why divinity is hidden from laboured sight. The key to truth and accrued wisdom is always found in inspection of the detail. More detail reveals greater clarity (and that is the main reason why “religion” twists the metaphor, comparing detail to “the devil”). That is why miscreant “powers” feign [lies, damned lies and] statistics and generalities as “evidence” (sic) of truth. They (who bankroll all religions) do this to deliberately and mischievously circumvent detail and deny disaffecting logic.

Perhaps they are aware of the problem, perhaps not, but God can only be seen in absolute detail or not at all. Therefore disquieting logic dictates that omnipotence is the whole quantum layer which, in part, appends locational physicality (or, rather, summarily “points to” denoting physical localities that offer “windows” within perceptive interpretation). Suffice to say; though the quantum layer isn’t physical, it can be made so by leveraging frequency generated perception within certain astral bandwidths (or sub-astral bandwidths). Truth and knowingness is set apart from causal effects as these transcend perception and are beyond calculated fabrication. In fact that which is classed as “reality” is done so for perceptive convenience and that rather hinders any meaningful quest to “find God” or true truth. In association, the Atlantean use of the term “tamarian” was in direct reference to the quantum layer and, most significantly, the atomic resonance or “flux” effect which signifies “balanced” divine will. Imbalance in flux will lead to states of general disharmony right the way up to nuclear incidents (which impact the full astral spectrum and are not merely limited to this reality plane).

Catastrophic events permeate all the way up the astral ladder

In my last article I introduced a mysterious enclave of humanoid aliens who had been residing on the Spanish mainland in the 1950’s. Their information legacy proves they (“Ummos” is an affectionate nickname that is now commonly used to identify the “type”) were authentic. From this record, they most significantly classed only ten dimensions (that bear no relation to the mathematical irrelevance that posits reality symptoms width, breadth, depth have dimensional qualities). Seven of these fundamental bandwidths were aeons or “base states” of God, which are also sometimes referred to as the seven heavenly (astral light) states. Logic persuades that, “in order”, they would occupy positions three to nine up the astral ladder. Dimension ten would be the culmination of everything; a repository of “raw time” that permanently sits “in the present”. That leaves dimension one and two and deduction impresses these are configured “dark light” holographic universes. In case anyone misses it, here I inadvertently (lol) identify plausible reasons for foreboding over the so-called “ascension” of man.

In light of this, it seems to me that our material reality plane is most likely hosted in the lower of the two dark dimensions. If ascension rumours prove valid, we are on the cusp of our bandwidth and will make the necessary imminent transition to “Tara” when the tamarian executes relevant changes in our DNA (delivered by the tamaras). Though the effect will be a technically spiritual evolution, man will have no comprehension of naked “epinoa” (which is commonly disfigured by dishonourable religious bluster) in motion. That which comes from God aligns with logic, truth and knowingness and this is why creative talent is pure. For God, there is no “best way”. There is only “the way [that works]” (which may mean infinite numbers of possible routes between A and B that could reduce upon “specific intentions”, such as “I need to travel between identified points within an hour”).  God’s intent is definitely not a predisposition towards group lobotomy for the sake of order or “love” (sic).

“Morality” in fact is largely the cancer of spirituality

Tamarian identified that the collective atomic flux acts as though it was “God’s skin”. Each individual atom might be (contextually) compared to a pore. This means the canopy can be perceived (and used or manipulated) from various standpoints. Conceptually it is much more than the arbitrary “atheistic” top down, bottom up reflexes that have been differently touted by mainstream science and religion. For instance, there are numerous cyclic complimenting partnerships (such as those that become physical objects) which have been purposefully etched out of the main framework. Whereas the tamaras divides (in typical Pharisaic terms) “spiritual” and “physical”, the tamarian places the spiritual as the hidden anchor that permeates motivated existence. In other words, the Atlanteans recognised purpose exudes vitality and not vice versa. Here we are brought face to face with the key flaw with tamaras’ Ra worship.

In their management of humans, the Sephardim view latent ability or talent as something akin to superfluous. In that regard, they place as much necessity for “inferior” (and unspiritual) beings to be [blindly] “enlightened” by God (Ra) as those with normal or better than normal receptive faculties. To all intents and purposes humans are little more than fodder to be processed by them. Their approach strangely observes the “socialist” opinion that that which cannot be approached from humble grounds of understanding is not understood (i.e. because humans are incapably of empathy, what’s the point in developing true spiritual mandates?). Whether content is simple enough to facilitate universal understanding doesn’t alter the truth. By their own reasoning, the unspiritual are also incapable of worshiping Ra. Courses are undeniably designed to pressgang congregations into paying tribute (more “torture”).

According to the Atlanteans, the thinking being (separated from “animals”) covets an evolving, deliberate mind. Conversely, Draco Sephardim (given their subtle but obvious mandates in our realms) would argue that all life was locality “crafted” beneath the manifest version of God (Ra). Per this concept, knowing one’s place or station in life (in respect to that version of the divine) precedes “purposefulness” (or “usefulness”). Those that defy their chosen (for them) route dishonour God (check out the “values” of austere Tibetan Buddhism and the tale of the man who had his eyes removed for daring to attempt to emigrate from his homestead sometime in the 1960’s). Differences between “thinking beings” and animals are rendered invalid (under these terms) beyond competent definition of hierarchical chains of command. In fairness to the Draco Sephardim, without Pleiadian ability to alter the frequency of atoms, man is pretty much restricted to “his lot” and that rarely goes beyond birth right and all those relating casual connections.

Also (and courtesy of the Pharisees, of course) unaware human beings have more or less completely succumbed to the tamaras. Ra may well be scorned by morons today, but his attitude decidedly presides over that universal conscience of man in just about every respect. Differences between thinking beings and animals have become so remote it is though they are no more. General belief is that if animals were given the ability to communicate, they would (with correct education) adopt the human “value base” (the monster that summarises Pharisaic programming) one way or another. Given proscribed ethics are largely (if not entirely) the product of whimsical indoctrination, was an “animal” to transform into an intelligent being, there is little doubt that the “powers” would do everything in their range to “fix” it too (perhaps hinted at in George Orwell’s Animal Farm).

We must go beyond the obvious eye to come to terms with the splendour that is the tamarian. My last article highlights that the importance of atoms passes by unnoticed for just about all scientists and amateur enthusiasts alike, even though “string” and “superstring” theories have the potential to spearhead truth. Figuratively, the “informed” know that particles have the constitution to make infinite replicas of themselves (displaced by time and space). Atoms, I state, are an integral part of spirituality. Souls are the collaboration of atomic will. In fact to be more precise and to paraphrase my book The Beauty of Existence Decoded, every atom conveys a “soul” window. Pyramid hierarchies attempt to “point” the body along best of breeds’ individual spiritual courses. Atlantis leaders (version six of the genetic template) knew this but they were also not human. Today that species group is colloquially known as Sirians (heralding from Sirius). However, there are numerous races under the DNA umbrella which notably include our celebrated Pleiadian amphibians. Mer-people (almost certainly doubling as “Oannes”) were instrumental at demonstrating how the tamarian can be positively drawn off to empower life within functional Atlantis society (and possibly even on Mars too).

“Human” was created as a cooperative of hybrids (we have many different types which are evidently mostly beyond the vision of the corporate funded ‘Genome Project”) formulated (in part) from Sirian DNA. Thus, it does not require the rocket scientist to consider the likelihood that embers of latent Pleiadian DNA lurking in our gene set is “the cause” behind overzealous promotion of fantastical belief systems that literally aim to “force” make-believe into being. Ironically in fact, in a sense what the Pharisees are doing with their Zionist agenda crudely attempts to replicate some of the great Pleiadians achievements which culminated in their cultivation of “reality states”. There are naturally critically distinct differences in approaches and I will explore the Zionist methodologies in more detail when I focus on the tamaras.

To simply summarise now, the Pleiadians coordinated uniform sovereign will to ensure group ambition encompassed civilised society in entirety, whereas Zionist “shepherds” deliver threats of fear or reward as coordinated “incentives” for their sheep with the ideal of ultimately forcing peak body order over their cultivated civilised flock (which by designation is transformed into “the great group” per the euphemism peace on Earth). Pleiadian consciousness was built on the principle of “commune” which had to cater for the will (or wishes) of every individual or fail. Conversely, Zionism’s “expendable individual” concept reduces necessity to “only those that support the great group”.

Naturally Pleiadian culture became a major benchmark for Atlantis societal ambition and the taramian features heavily in [now mostly obsolete] cultural lore. A parallel “justice” mechanism (that focused on causes of disorder and not merely evident symptoms) did aim to putty any cracks (as deemed) in social conscience.  Justice then was different in structure to the modern Zionist tyranny over conscience and spirituality. Even so, the two methods are at least conceptually compatible and insomuch neither work. This is because “order” (however well-reasoned and logically directed) either reinforces or challenges dignity. Because “taste” is spectral, all “specific” laws are doomed to defend causes at the expense of certain demeanours. By way of remedy, Gnostic “Christians” (the original Druids) attempted to rekindle some of those forgotten Pleiadian ideals (which incidentally suggests to me that Judaism “broke in two” after Akhenaten’s defeat and that is why his Babylonian status has been fabricated in order to obscure real political intrigue of the time, covering up relevance to modern day standards all the while).

It also suggests that Judaism and “apostate” Jews’ history spans at least ten thousand years. Akhenaten’s immediate followers would become the original Gnostics (though the mission only formularised around 300BC – a time of great political upheaval) and they were the ones prepared to battle against Pharisaic Ra occultists. Whilst modern day orthodox Jews would be mostly inclined to deny obvious plausibility of a deeper history than tradition permits, they are unable to hide from the conspicuous evidence of Pharisaic double dealing from the time records begin. Duplicity (bearing false witness) is also perceived to underscore power and that formally implicates long lines merchant bankers (who later became known as infamous Levite “industrialists”). In fact anthropology has an even bigger problem. The current scope of intelligent man changing from “moron” to “genius” allows no time, no evolutionary path for transition.

Did human proudly spawn ochre graffiti on cave walls or was this the out pouring of Neanderthal ape?

Popular depictions may show no evidence of the fact, but (and as mentioned earlier) Pleiadians associated with Atlantis were aquatic or, in other words, “mer-people”. Nommo amphibious, hermaphrodite Gods of Dogon myths, Hermes/Poseidon from the Greek/Roman legends perhaps is all that remains of the Earthly account. Whether tales are related or not is unimportant. Messages contained within ancient chronicles were “transcendental”. Would it not be ironical if it turned out that the Atlantis’ great spiritual centre was in the very same region now occupied by the Sphinx and Great Pyramid of Giza? Thousands of years ago the Middle East was extraordinarily fertile and wet. Geological evidence informs much of the Sphinx was submerged under water for a long period; long enough to be home to the Pleiadian sages? This also adds credence to beliefs in distant past underwater civilisations. But, to avoid creating confusion, I should mention that there are also numbers of non-aquatic Pleiadian varieties (or should I say races?) that arguably go all the way up to “heavenly body” status. Whether any of these had any association with Atlantis’ residents is open to discussion.

I can confirm sea visitors still regularly come to our oceans. It is unclear if these are descendants of Atlantis, but the notion is plausible.  It does suggest the “gulf oil spill” may have been a direct attack on their infrastructure, in my opinion. For those that still believe the catastrophe was an “accident” (sic), go discover how the local stock market sufficiently predicted the event and payed out healthy well-timed insurance to the important folks that owned the physical assets. Gordon Duff’s bizarre ravings about a fourth dimensional war over the oceans being waged between the US navy and non-specific extra-terrestrials is an extension of this but (equally) should be considered an “unlikely” overall scenario. Sonar “pings” that regularly sensationally interrupt sea life navigation systems have been counter-neutralised by intelligent entities located within their catchment range. The “big picture” is fairly significant as numbers of different entity types use our seabeds. Even so none (to my knowledge) have “colonised” or could be regarded as permanent residents in the strict sense. It would be reasonable to at least postulate that some or maybe all establish communications with view to mutually collaborative exchanges.

I have been led to believe that the main reason they have set up on the sea floor is, and I quote”, “we (humans) can’t get at them there

Atlantis leaders could change atomic values to the frequency needed for gold simply by using their minds. Pleiadians took this a step further but their efforts were in no way comparable to Catholic-New Age “Cosmic Christ” tradition. Feigning commune by attempting to force (impose) universal “love” (or, rather, soft austerity dressed as “love”) is a barefaced Zionism “tactic”. Perhaps predictably, the Catholics (who invented Cosmic Christ) are the end product of a long winded pharisaic domination of Gnosticism. Possibly ignited by the infiltrator St Paul, the determination towards “bell, book and candle” dogmatisation in deference to faith has crafted a reflectively causal “group consciousness”. Tamarian, we have learnt, is the endless atomic mesh that underpins connectivity of everything. For instance, acupuncture and (to some degree) hypnosis is made possible by it. It cannot be avoided, so ignorance as a weapon is the most probable strategy used by deniers.

Atoms (as far as this dimensional reality goes) are inflexible windows that we, for our part, are “trapped” in (per the rules of the illusion). Or this is what materialists would have us believe. The mind, according to those heathens, is nothing more than a reality symptom. Cosmic Christ should be renamed Cosmic Mind for the program attempts to synthesise a group thought pool. The Pleiadians did it properly. Coercion, they knew, would ultimately be met with resistance, and resistance meant the end of any commune. Only by harnessing a compatible, non-conflicting group identity could communism succeed. Once the sense (or framework) of commune had been established it was possible to reconfigure atoms as the means towards cooperative wishes. It became possible (within certain parameters) for those parties involved to literally will their way in life.

It could be said the tamarian and tamaras signify faith versus control approaches to vital reality. Peiadians, by definition, had faith in the knowledge that atoms would comply with their desires because they observed the will to be. Conversely, the Sephardim (reptilian ‘Gods”) are firmly behind the tamaras for opposite reasons. Nevertheless, as vaguely effervescent accounts of reptilian character are invariably presented in ways geared to sensationalising for sensation’s sake, “purpose” is reduced to the narcissistic human abuse cycles offering “victimhood” as the great prize. Consistent messages regurgitate blood thirsty, unfair abductors preying on poor little unsuspecting, God fearing humans for “sport” over and over. Logic is so adrift of truth, I sense the Pharisees have a hand in the manner information is being presented. They, after all, own the popular mainstream and alternative views for by “backing” both sides, success is guaranteed.

I have written extensively on the real motive behind supposed human “abductions” and accompanying ceremonies. Actual flaws of reptilian libido can be clearly seen in their devotion to regulations which are symptoms of their determination to control. Grafting “order” on society is the summary effect. It is also important to highlight their societies do not recognise that which is the epitome of pharisaic idealism – “survival of the fittest”. Reptilians know survival is merely a natural effect of living existence; a symptom of life. True blueprints use template formulated assimilation as the predominant creative device. As I explain in this article, where permitted, Ciakars absorb their victims by means of fusing mind, body and soul. Master and servant become united as a single entity which is made more powerful by the strength of the bond. “Victims”, in these cases, must be willing.

To reptilians, humans are generalised as low caste, unsophisticated “underlings” that need discipline. The tamaras is the fundamental vehicle used by them to ensure their execution of discipline over us follows a program. Sirians do not function well under laws and there lies the contradiction in conflict for part Sirian, part reptilian human. Proponents supporting human corridors of power are definitely tweaked to promote reptilian mindset, because to suggest otherwise would be absurd (considering the weight of evidence supporting an ongoing, without end pharisaic conspiracy to control). Far from being conspiratorial in their ambition, Sephardic overlords apply logical rule of law configurations via political equilibriums (affirmed by all historic data) governing the body of humanity because they presume they are executing God’s will.

Humans are part reptilian and were created by the Sephardim and this adds to their cause. What if it was the other way round? They would let their quarry roam wild, “unattended” like recalcitrant lambs? I have explained the origins of man many times before, but here’s the micro-version. “Snake” euphemises the Ciakar (in biblical Adam and Eve). Ciakars are renowned both for their remarkable cunning and their chameleonic camouflage ability. Sephardim is the most genetically advanced Ciakar physical form (which is now located too far adrift from our reality bandwidth to manifest in normal state) and they became the direct creators of human beings (which are versions of much earlier cumbersome Neanderthal). Mundane analysis of amino acids disguises the fact that our creation and partnership with our creators was much more than merely blood matching. Testament to truth came recently when the female student of mine associated with this article recalled to me a startling but acutely perceptive observation she had made.

Ciakar is a mispronunciation of chakra

Anyone that has visited Thailand should be aware of the customary expression “Farang” routinely used to address white skinned “foreign” visitors by the natives. This is because the very first Caucasians that attempted to colonise were from France. Farang was the closest the Thai palate could come naturally to configuring the word with ease. Ken Bakeman, Eva Draconis and others have observed problems in reiterating reptilian guttural pronunciation. If Ciakar is indeed the mispronunciation of chakra, the news would make eternal good sense, because the “commonality” between them and us is found in “paired” energy fields. It would also mean chakras must act as the “communication bridge” between those located outside our reality plane (a different light frequency). Chakras are the congestion points of atomic bandwidths that operate similarly to other astral highways. Drawing on the astral link is the way reptilians “access” us.

This is an extraordinarily important piece of information, because it completely redefines our understanding of physical health. Fundamental “causes” of all illness are the result of an imbalance or imbalances of the ectoplasm energy field. The ectoplasm is divided up by chakras and they become barometer measures that divine trouble with relevant body functionality (which is an effect relating to the cause). I have mentioned before on my other website that Pasteur’s germ theory (an industrialist “survival” scam) is entirely wrong because the body primarily attempts to assimilate anything that goes into it (following existential creation). That which cannot be assimilated, such as processing worthy “toxins”, are reduced to waste or, if impossible to process, cloaked/contained.

Energy fields (ectoplasm) are located beyond time and space even though apparent physical “light” presence may contradict that truth. Depending on how it’s conceived, an individual field can theoretically extend to the far reaches of the universe. On our superficial “reality” plane it may only occupy radials spanning a few dozens of metres out from the centre. Therefore, within the proximity of a commercial building, for instance, it is likely all workers’ ectoplasms overlap. Each individual sub-conscious feeds off the other (inter-connected ectoplasm) and then chakras implement the effects, whether positive or negative. Consequentially if one is ill, all become ill reflecting the higher body state.

Disease is spread by out-of-alignment chakras

It is also courtesy of the chakras why the Sephardim feel intrinsically connected to dear old human (similar to the fashion a shepherd becomes responsible for his sheep). By extension, they believe the tamaras gives them “divine tools” to directly interfere in the affairs (politics) of man. If they were acting figuratively out-of-line, would not God retaliate by smiting them from existence for eternity?  Was I to argue tamarian is God “the cause” then tamaras would be the utopian “symptom” of divinity. From the authoritarian perspective, man (or, more precisely, human) is the lowest rung of a long line of “supplants” that form extended (though hidden) hierarchical chains of command all the way up to “God”. I use “God” in inverted commas here because the philosophic outline concerns levels of manifestation and definitely not omnipresent “oneness” (which happens to be the predominant feature of the tamarian). The genetic chain I refer to consists of “Anunaki” bloodlines which would raise Ra (the sun God) as their “highest state”. Worship, per knowledge of progressive bloodlines all the way up to God, is not a choice. It is a rite and those that refuse to capitulate or deny faith insult “the ultimate creator” per said opinion. That is the Sephardic view on this and the Jews were not labelled Sephardic (“chosen”) peoples accidentally.

So the Pharisees (whether they individually realise it or not) do actually fulfil God’s bidding or, rather, cooperate with the Sephardic interpretation of that philology. Putting aside the deceit that has become the style of modern “sciences”, hallmarks of this tradition (no matter which time period is considered) stand out like “dog’s balls” wherever they are noted. Branding citizens under “the flag”, passport control, forced labour, regulated workplaces and on and on are all their measures. Versions of fundamentalism are conspicuously built around differing interpretations of aggregated symptoms. For our age, for example, the metaphysical is (at best) marginalised and most mostly denied, so fundamentalism is not merely restricted to data interpretation.

Everything calculated must be perceived to be physical or it does not “exist” and (laterally) has no impact on theories generated to resolve equations. Romans and many other ancient cultures revered nature’s cycles; a very different approach to the modern condition. So when abundance appeared to “break”, reason persuaded the “overall creator” was protesting at abuses (humans that behaved “unnaturally”) against the system (nature). This prescient philosophy is found as a significant value base determining all modern laws (even though science, on occasions, seems at loggerheads). The concerted attempt to purge all possibility for supposed unnatural behaviours (remonstrated by Catholic St Paul and other good Levites) surely aims to reduce the human to “automaton” (under Ra) status. Laws support the Ra concept to the hilt.

It is not widely known (even in alternative circles specialising in the paranormal) that the sun remotely “washes” our DNA (in the atomic format). Therefore the belief in Ra cannot simply be shrugged off as wilful superstition. In fact at least three sources persistently alter our DNA. The sun (material black light), we are told, issues a bi-product called vitamin D which is needed for survival. Few would acknowledge the inner [invisible – celestial white] light source is the one (when performing in isolation – free of sunlight) that triggers our production of melatonin. Sephardic Draco attempt to limit the effects of melatonin as much as possible, for all “alien DNA change-agents” are seen as “contraveners of the wishes of Ra”. In order to block external forces, they created a third light source. Assisted by other worldly technologies, our moon recycles amplified sunlight (is “madness” a side effect under special conditions?). Though this does not close the loop (so to speak), it does assure there is very little opportunity for any life form to detach from Ra’s influence for significant periods. One of the stark consequences is our inability to empathise.

The word empathy (in its modern use) is actually a distortion. As it is used today, empathy is contextually no different to sympathy beyond the presumption that to second guess something equates to understanding or, dare I say, implies reliving someone else’s experiences. Unless you can literally be what you claim to empathise with [regularly highlighted when uncomfortably confronted by others’ bereavements], you cannot empathise at all. However, qualities humans’ lack, the Pleisdians thankfully have in abundance. In this capacity, they have the insight to appreciate everything from the objective standpoint.  Were circumstances to justify efforts, they can even appreciate detestable acts. Humans, conversely, instinctively despise everything they detest. Researching extensively on this subject, I have yet to meet a truly objective human being; one that can “love for love’s sake” for instance. Humans are naturally vain and self-centred so “objectivity” is invariably simply an extension of selfish individuality. Standard honest responses to any given scenario might look like “I approve because I can do that” or “I disapprove because I would never do that”.

The closest a human will come to mimicking objectivity is through the use of transference. If we are not exclusively subjective, why are there numerous and constant wars that erupt at every waking opportunity invariably pitched against the most trivial of resolvable complaints? Transference is a technique whereby the subjective “assumes” (or presumes) feelings for something drawn from its catalogue of deemed “relative experiences”. Taking the theme of bereavements as the case study, the subjective might compare its experiences surrounding the death of a beloved pet bunny called “Floppy” (for instance) to “relate to” the agonising anguish of the objective that happens to be mourning the loss of (shall we say) a favourite uncle. Multi-lateral appreciation (to appreciate for appreciation’s sake as though it was an extension of core being) has gifted the Pleiadians with the genius credentials to evolve into something truly empathetic. Genius is merely the spark the fires the determination to journey. Therefore nothing is born with the power of empathy.

Ability is something that must blossom from experiential evolution

Acceleration of evolution bestowed the powers (and genetics) that the Pleiadians needed to manage the tamarian effectively enough to create their own balanced universalism paradigm. Maybe a consequence of our reptilian “survivalist” nature, unfortunately this is something we could never do. Perhaps the Gnostics (behind ancient Tibetan folklore too?) were forlorn in their efforts to rekindle Atlantis spirit, but they tried with heart, body and mind. Emphasised by ancient druidic practices (mostly obsolete today), they were true communists (no relation to industrial Marxism) in so much as their efforts supported the utopian goal towards mentored universal equality. As an aside, this suggests the four “gospels” of the New Testament Bible have all been “fixed” by parties unsympathetic with communistic practices. Even the so-called “gentile” gospel (Luke) compares the social status of a Syro-Phoenician (Syrian) woman as lower than a common household mutt.

Caste systems and royal progeny are classical symbols that emphasise reptilian philosophy endorsing the tamaras as the staple for natural order. Given priorities of pharisaic Zionism encompass fostering patriotism (below caste systems that elevate a nouveaux meritocracy), family planning, enforcing social status, either isolating or blending cultures, Russian bastardised “Communism” (sic) was indisputably one of their grand operational initiatives. On one hand living circumstances were very good (heavily subsidised rents, free utilities). That’s why an irrepressible exodus of Jews flooded into Russia particularly after Brezhnev announced his five year plan. Infrastructures in place allowing connection with those outside (foreigners) were very, very bad. People with larger than average families were not provided for and, consequentially, less was deemed better. “Free enterprise” was pitched as the “gravest of all sins”. And didn’t America’s “royal” whip masters’ milk that cow?

So, in reality, the closest the mainstream comes to embracing true communist philology is extremely infrequently found in religions’ culture, such as Buddhism’s vocational priesthood, Islam’s alms for the poor and Christianity’s Christ consciousness (i.e. humanity is “one organ” – the eternal body of Christ). Governments (communist and other) do everything in their power to render all efforts to communalise man impotent. Pharisees have always wanted divided societies within tight cultures, educated criminals controlled by austere “justice” mechanisms and strong departmentalised hierarchical infrastructure oversight (such as United Nations’ globalism). Constant wars between fake nations help keep the masses quiet, but the turmoil is also designed to manufacture continual societal divisions founded on “us versus them” lore. The “stranger” euphemises the other.

Going back to “the beginning”, Aristotle (a covert Pharisee) attempted to demean God through his conceptualisation of “unmoved movers” (or prime movers). These he bestowed with unlimited, but arbitrary creative powers.  In his obsessive zeal, he proposed the preposterous. According to his abominable legacy, the essence or will of God is so insular it is disconnected from (and symptomatically unaware of) physical reality. The blasphemy goes on to propose that everything in “the physical” is powered by uncaring, irresponsible being(s) that are perhaps quantitatively unaware of its direct manifestation.  Eternity is transformed into something timeless and infinite yet irrelevant but for the egotistical whims of detached insular creators. Would not like sentiment elegantly upgrade opinions of average-thinking modern-day atheist-agnostics?

Aristotle’s (possibly a contemporary of the first Gnostics as known) unmoved movers are described as “thought beings” (or constantly thinking vapour). Though biblical texts make no clear mention of it, thought beings are direct references to “archangels”. The most important archangel (specifically in relation Earth) was Lucifer. Instinct tells me the reason Isaiah presents him (along with “Ba’al”) in such a dim light is worship of him was the great threat to pharisaic autonomy over man.  Does the Morning Star and sun “competing” for daybreak presence offend revellers before Ra too? Contrary to popular understanding, thought is a form of light that travels symptomatically much faster than photons. It is colloquially well known that Lucifer (of all the archangels) had the original controlling mandate over Earth after “other attempts to configure abundant eternal life systems had all failed”. Gnosticism’s apparent “lack of accountability” seems to be a much better holistic appreciation of nature than the Roman-pharisaic “standards” approach. This impresses me that old druid orders followed Ba’al (the hierarchical instrument of Lucifer). Considering this more carefully, it should seem hardly surprising that Ba’al happens to be in conflicting completion (after En-ki’s conquest to “secure” the underworld flopped) with the Sephardim who remotely authored the Bible.

When Moses wrote the “Ten Commandments” he aimed to jump start religious standards in his favour. Whereas, at first glance, sentiment seems noble enough, upon stricter analysis, every commandment promotes notorious double standards that neither reflect whimsical human morality well nor promote divine being. Partnered with the Mosaic scourge, Aristotle’s control measures are still alive and well but buried so deep in cultural Roman Catholicism, they are almost unrecognisable now. Does not today’s International (“globalism”) Standards Organisation (ISO) certification attempt to impose arbitrary universal commerce measures that “transcend” (conflict with) staffing competence? Some would say that religions effectively plunder God’s divinity. Terms of surrender serve up grotesque contortions of the image of true faith.

Man may as well be God now is the unfortunate consequence

In support of that unlikely Sephardic-pharisaic cause, evidence (regurgitated timeless ideals) determines an ever-present external body crafts man’s divinity. Why would the ambitions of one greedy generation be celebrated and adopted by the next? Perhaps a little culture will stick, but generally speaking fashions change and when the young guns move into town they come with their own pioneering spirit. Clearly those that sought to and still do control man are not of this Earth (in the conventional sense). Uncompromisingly moralist directives over the ages all brandish the hallmarks of reptilian Sephardim. Measures (while observed) also absolutely fulfil the requirements of tamaras “in manifestation”.

Taking the presumption that the Sephardim are remote overlords of humanity, there is no concrete evidence supporting “time lord” status. Nevertheless, they may have some ability to influence the fate of groups or individuals. They may be able to intervene and change the tide (is that what is meant by the moon’s magnetism?) for and against those that affect or disaffect favoured progress. Time (as it is currently experienced) will certainly not remain constant after Ra’s transformation, when our planet shifts from Earth state to Tara. One symptomatic consequence I have predicted is that our carbon molecular status will “instantly” revert to silicon. From the astral perspective, silica is much more flexible and this should bestow us with the supplementary advantage of appearing to supersede nature (in terms of what is regarded as normal today).

Once we become “aware” of our miraculous transformations, we will have the power to execute all sorts of unnatural acts. The supernatural will transcend to become the “new natural”.  An atomic change of the ilk of a universal species shift from carbon to silicon would emphasise a collaboration of tamarian and tamaras. This proposes that both are not subject to effective management autonomy of any external entities choosing to bluster about malignant superiority. Recognition of concrete cycles and the tools to change and manipulate them is all that respective demagogic minions can capitalise on. The Sephardim, as I have highlighted, have used the False Matrix to great effect, but it is not sufficient for the suppression of man. Perhaps, in conjunction with the Pharisees they can meet their long term goals, but will the servant end up biting the hand of the master?

Though the implementation of this false matrix strategy has been as much about halting the ascension of man as anything else, I do still feel the Sephardim are more than a little excited by the prospect of seeing how we adapt to their world. We are their prodigal sons after all, so there must be some residue maternal feelings for us. On the other hand, too many of us have not adapted well to religious government control by their design. This will likely promote conflict and, perhaps, discontentment of ugly proportions. We will arrive largely blind to our new abilities; a terrain that is fully known and staked out by them. Their active resources are beyond our imagination, but if we are committed to contaminating, just as we contaminate everything in our domain, perhaps it will become clear why they have gone to so much trouble in their attempts to isolate us.

The Lottery Has Been Compromised by “31”

Standard
The Lottery Has Been Compromised by “31”

Rainbow-MickeyMy most recent extreme realisation came as the result of what many would brush off as a coincidence, an unlucky anomaly, something that could have happened to anyone per the random appeal of atheist speculation. Though I regularly play our similarly styled Club Keno game, I very rarely partake of the national lottery. Nevertheless, my cosmic channels had been insisting I have a crack at the big Saturday Lotto that happens once in a blue moon for some time. So, on January 2nd, I purchased a ticket. Most of the numbers were not mine. western-astrologyThey had been selected by my wife, even though the same sorry digits had had no success after several attempts on Keno. As the range of numbers available for selection is considerably wider on Keno, number “77” was not a lottery option. Even so, a “Systems Nine” pick would have been miles too pricey for my meagre budget. I decided, thus, the best compromise was to create a number of game selections which would, ultimately, include all of my wife’s hot numbers.

Let us not lose sight of the fact, in total only nine numbers were involved in this supernatural tryst. All were neatly arranged in ascending order on my reference Keno ticket. All I needed to do was succinctly mark representative crosses on my Saturday Lotto form and the mission would have been complete. Yet, I failed to do that as I managed to duplicate one sacred number in place of another. 0a52a5aMy mind hasn’t deteriorated…yet. Arguably, I have a vastly superior IQ. Proficient attention to detail and disciplined accuracy is essential for any creative artist and, as a concert trained classical pianist; I have found levels few attain. So why could I not duplicate nine simple numbers for last Saturday’s Lotto? The answer is simple. Thoughts were intercepted to ensure history was accorded. The outcome was very significant and, though the number missed was a winning one, it would not have been sufficient to earn me a prize. 1aThis is important, because it tells me the forces behind this were not malicious. Though it’s a shame I did not win, as it has been revealed that I shall collect the penultimate prize in a lottery at some juncture in my life.

I would like to concentrate on the abnormal numbers for this analysis. Though I suspect all my wife’s selections are cosmically fortuitous, we shall press on only considering those cracks in the system. For instance, for some reason the number “7” had found its way in one selection line, yet it was not one of my wife’s. How had this happened? After racking my brains for potential motive, I assume I must have split “77” to reveal “7”, but why did I not add the two 7’s to create, a more appropriate, “14”? The first illegitimate number is a very special one and far from incongruous when considering meanings. Figure 7, for instance, is very similar to the cosmic script symbol which equates to the transcendental inter-dimensional traveller. Fancy that, but there’s more. Lucky seven is the energetic combination of all the planets that affect man: the Sun, the Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. Keep it a secret because no one knows it yet, but seven, in this context, is God’s ultimate blessing for Earth dwellers. God is, as I explain in “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, the summary of everything.

44907828.cms

Numerology has always seemed rather flaky to me. Being of able body & mind, I have always preferred logic and reason over intuitive superstition. Nevertheless, I am always open for a challenge and I decided to use myself as a guinea pig for numerological testing. There is a chart that gives values to letters of the Standard English alphabet to a numeric maximum of “8” (although “9” is featured, it does not actually represent any letters). 670px-Calculate-Your-Name-Number-in-Numerology-Step-3-Version-2Letters of all given names are added up in such a way to produce a single digit score (i.e. 1-9). Another strange unrelated coincidence is I had nine usable numbers for Saturday’s Lotto. Anyway, returning to the thread, my score happened to be “8”. Out of all the projected meanings as to the character of the name bearers, the only one that suited me was, remarkably, eternal number eight (Saturn).

“…when exalted makes you a saint. When afflicted it makes you a proficient criminal.”

Years ago, out of curiosity, I found my name score using the Kabbalah calculator. That turned up a surprise. The result precisely matched the reading of infamous [satirical] “Satanist” occultist, Aleister Crowley. I am what he calls Thelema or “Law (love) under Will (God)”. quote-this-serpent-satan-is-not-the-enemy-of-man-but-he-who-made-gods-of-our-race-knowing-aleister-crowley-72-95-41The coiled splendour (Nis, the copper serpent, is a variant) is manifest brilliance which can either support the dark or light side. I believe I represent the dark side in the spirit of light, because it is only through comprehension of darkness that light becomes as “clear as crystal”. As complete God is a perfect replica of light and dark combined (per the Buddhist Yin Yang concept), then eternal grace can only be achieved from balance of all things.

My initial feelings on my breach of thoughts privacy saw anger at phantom menaces. I conclusively conjured an omnipotent Draco mind control regime conducted on an industrial scale leveraging the crystalline False [light] Matrix. Just as with David Icke, Simon Parkes, James Bartley and all the other hypocrites, my reasoning was a consequence of obsessive, unjustified eruption. The Draco, by salacious reputation grounded on little more than superstitions, had become my scapegoat for ignorance. martial-law-is-obama-new-america3They do, I know, have the ability to take deceit to the very highest level but to what extent the universal human mind is interfered with is anyone’s guess. By their moral laws they seem only able to exploit gullibility. Taking America’s feeble President Obama, do we not see an amateur version of universal mind control and exploitation of the weak minded? The script for the impressionable pagans has been Obama is a gay, black drug using Messiah that turned out no different to “Angel of Death” Bush. They have been told he will be sacrificed for Martial Law. Whether this is over guns to enable the war hawk Hilary Clinton an indefinite dictatorship or something else remains to be seen.

photo-21plusContinuing my Lotto saga, for some unknown reason I duplicated the only Fibonacci sequence number selection “21” twice and omitted “31”; a number I should have chosen. It was a winning item too, but that isn’t important as, fundamentally, it would have made no difference to the result. Twenty one (years) is the harmonic representative of bodily maturity, assuming everything goes to plan. This use of maturity might equally say “fully grown” or “bodily adult” (other than the brain, which matures around age twenty four, another of my wife’s special choices, amusingly), but it does not negate the heinous standards imposed on human biological slavish robots by powers. The sexual clock is activated between age 7-8 in normal females and 10-11 in males, for instance. the-hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-typography-42-hd-wallpapersInterestingly, two “21’s” equal “42” and this was another of my wife’s hot selections (a winning number too) and is particularly significant. Forty two is the age, dare I say again, a normal human psyche reaches maturity. Just because we are given the license to think clearly does not mean we cannot be swayed by shameless propaganda. Therefore, just about all adults remain as children throughout their lives.

It is all the more intriguing that Douglas Adams selected “42” as the “meaning of life” number in the satirical “Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”. Reasoning is equally bizarre for the number was selected because it came before “43” and after “41”. Sounds innocent enough, except the numeric equivalent of pure enlightenment is maturity plus one (43) and the chaos of dark ignorance is maturity minus one (41). Hitchhiker-Movie-hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-543348_1280_1024In addition, the numeric value of the name of God’s essence using the standard [English] alphabet cipher is also 43. Though church prayers are always ended with Amen, the correct alliteration is A-M-O-N which equates to 1 + 13 + 15 + 14. Amon was the invisible God of the air introduced by Akhenaten. However as this was the principle deity, in effect, he had ushered in the first (according to mainstream history) system of monotheism. Chronologically, at this time, the Israelites were still disparate tribes worshiping a multitude of subordinate Gods. 541509_384090028364531_1823919617_n-750x500Arguably, given the varied names of God in Scripture, this may still be the case today. Mind you, I am now the only non-Farsi speaking resident at my boarding house. The new addition is a horrible narcissist of 43 years old.

Of course, if I had filled out my Lotto card correctly, I would have crossed “21”, “31” and “42”. So does “31” have any spiritual value? Indeed it has and is, theoretically, the most significant of all numbers, being a very special Mersenne prime. Choice “33” (yes, another of my wife’s too) combined with “31” corroborates this is more than a mere fluke. Israel’s tribes eventually consolidated under the banner of Judea and from then on their name given to the invisible God (not YHWH as might be supposed) was “El”. Thirty one happens to be the (Kabbalah) numeric representation of “El” and 31 hertz is God’s tension or chaos frequency. Hindu sage Vajasaneya Samhita wrote Pradjapati, “lord of the people”, created the universe by articulating the odd numbers from 1 to 31 in the Shukla Yayur Veda. These are the fundamental frequencies of creation (ultimate brain wave functionality is around 7 hertz, for instance). Creation has always been about subtlety and that is why “Jesus” used the mustard seed analogy.

numerology-banner

I shall conclude with information on the only other winning number, “10”, as I feel sure it will be identified as important. Off the top of my head, though a little unnaturally, we seem to tune best to the decimal system and the much more natural Babylonian sacred base 60 (which, in fairness, is often broken into base 20 for ease of calculation), it should be said, is only a variation. Indeed, many of the secrets of cosmic mathematics can be unveiled simply by applying base 60, divine10Fibonacci ratios or combinations of the two.  It turns out though, as expected, number ten completes my puzzle. There are ten biblical commandments outlining codes for cooperative existential morality and ten plagues that inhibited objectives of the ancient Israelites under Moses. “10” is the trials and tribulations, the catalyst number signifying divine order. It represents a union between “one” and “nothing” as a batch or group. Finally, “10” is the change number. 4e1bd42d3401dcdde26c88d6c943cdf2It is the badge of Isis and Osiris, but also brings forth the symbol of love and light that compliments the ebb and flow (perhaps, also, rise and fall) of life. It is the number of the individual, because every life is unique and will only ever convey the decision making outcomes of the owner. Per that design, you perennially have the right to be optimistic and that faith will prompt creative powers of individuality leading to success, given patience.

Thank you for reading and do have a happy, prosperous year, but to finish I have an announcement on the global breaking news (sic) of a recent successful atomic hydrogen bomb test:

“North Korea does nothing without express authorisation from red China and China only authorises with blessing from the New World Order cabal.”