Tag Archives: archangel

The Satanism, Materialism, Atheism Connection

Standard
The Satanism, Materialism, Atheism Connection

pursuit-of-purityOver the ages, misinformation and disinformation has fused to obscure truth to such a degree it has allowed a fiction simply identified as “Satan” to pop into existence. But for maligned belief systems, this “existence” would vanish as though it had never been. satanism(Cosmic) Hebrew phonetics translates Satan as meaning adversary. However Israelite philosophy is so aggregated, students are never quite sure what is meant by contextual good or evil. For instance, biblical proverbs can offer absolute opposite resolves to identical situations. One verse might prophesise you must love all foreign nationals (goyim) as brothers, when others insist invaders only warrant abject hatred. Phonetically Satan is the combination of “sat” and “an”. In fact readers will be shocked that this is a merger of “truthful purity” and the “highest God” (An) from Sanskrit; a lofty language that stems from Atlantis.

So, given that insight, it is odd the Hebrews recognised the highest God of truthful purity as their adversary. Taking the numerous contradictions brazenly paraded in holy texts into consideration, outsiders must legitimately accuse Judaism and its Mosaic agents (orthodox Christianity and Islam) of duplicity here. That is the only valid conclusion, although it must be stressed that the Israelite religion was a version of the earlier Zoroastrian faith. Zoroastrianism tried to explain Anunaki influence using the metaphors “good and “evil”. Even so, the Pharisees commitment to the de-spiritualisation of God to impose obedience by rote on their slaves is no better paraphrased than by the “Christian” eternal damnation concept. To be precise, orders are given by St Paul (a Pharisee cloaked as “Christian”) in 2 Thessalonians Chapter 1 Verse 9:

“These will pay the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his power”

By this authoritarian definition; evil is everything and anything that detracts “what we [the “authority”] say” is good. counterfeitThe “glory of his power” is a convenient presumption that gives any designated proxy-agent the undeniable right to posit any sentiment “in the name of the lord”. Whether sentiment is noble or vile makes no difference, for that is the “glory of his power”. It is no wonder “Satan” has been given such a bum rap by the Jews and their affiliates. God needed a nemesis to counterfeit “good” and “evil”. Capitalising on ignorance, necessary Holy Scripture crafted dubious versions of Satan and Lucifer to establish the duality meme.

My book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” explains what is meant by the corruption of Satan (divinity of God). It is, for my research, the only source on the planet that presents truth plainly. Metaphors in gnostic texts, such as the Dead Sea Scrolls, are so subtle they are very hard to decipher (for those lacking tuned insight). Given all other reference points (in common circulation) more or less adopt the pharisaic distortion of enlightenment, even the most distinguished minds end up succumbing to blasphemy in some way. Suffice to say, the few that have read my hallowed news have invariably preferred not to understand, such is the contradiction against the power of proscribed bogus “order”.

first-starThough I don’t specifically argue the case (in my book), there is unquestionable logic in my summary explanation which simply states “Satan was the very first star [to bless the cosmos]”. If, as I reveal later, stars are portals allowing God to exude expressive intent along the dimensional planes (collectively known as astral records), and were the objectives of the first star “pure”, then, given that Sanskrit definition, Satan would indeed be manifest God (expanded as An-nun-aki). Annunaki, I have outlined before, is the combination and summary of “everything as one”. We are all individually parts (units) of the (same) Annunaki.

Initially, while Satan radiated purity, our cosmos consisted only of light and “beings” (which approximated forms of jellyfish apparitions). There were no planets. There was no physicality. God per se “in essence” (correctly described by the Gnostics) is and was the combination or fusion of male and female. Prior to formatting existence, the male aspect was merely content with eternal slumber. Synonymous with wisdom, the female, colloquially known as Sophia, contradicted the male and became impatient. Eternal slumber did not validate holistic fulfilment so Sophia, in earnest accountability, conspired with the Holy Spirit with the purpose of fragmenting reality. A bi-product of male and female, acting as their cerebral identity, the Holy Spirit had been brought into non-existence to adjudicate eternal compliance, given the polarity of standalone maternal/paternal desires.

holyspiritComplying with the wishes (request) of Sofia, the Holy Spirit determined that reality could not work as an aggregate (i.e. corporeal combination of male and female) model. Therefore Sophia, consumed with zealous idealism, intentionally created an existence exclusively for the female aspect on the presumption that the male would be content to slumber eternally. This was the grave error of creation and the one that has caused the stigma incorrectly associated with “Satan”. When God (the whole) woke up the war between ideological practicality and evolutional pragmatism began. At first a trickle of absolute blackness shaded the heavens that once were light. Before long an avalanche of intent overwhelmed Satan until the divine portal was eventually consumed by darkness.

primordialwatersThe ancient Celts had a word for this. “Nun” (a component of Annunaki) means “primordial (or creative) waters”. From Sophia’s perspective, nun encapsulated evil and that is why it is supposed evil heralded from darkness and not through cause of comparatively shallow Zoroastrian propaganda (adapted by the Israelites into the Kabbalah). In essence, from this perspective, evil is everything associated with “3D” object reality which, according to atheist materialists, is theoretically purely dark matter (the “fundamental” version of the evil contesting Sophia’s zeal). There are doubtless numerous other analogies to be found in alternative doctrines, but I think the message is already sufficient enough to be understood.

Ancient Romans philosophised that stars are prisms made from quartz (after Aristotle) and this view was continued by their Catholic Church. Going against “science”, they could not be more correct for all [real] planets are encased stars (discussed in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded). Innocents would be baffled by just how much unadulterated fantasy has been dogmatised as doctrine by credentialed scientists. If they suppose reflective babble might in some way substitute as “evidence” verifying how the cosmos works, academia has shown itself to be rotten to the core. Could Cartesian interpretation of Newton’s calculations presupposing gravity be so wrong, forces are the precise opposite of the theoretical models? Would not the effect of an item being pushed to the ground (by forces unseen) be identical to one being pulled? Suffice to say, our unshakable laws of gravity would be shown to be outrageously incorrect if they were truly understood and we were free of institutionalised propaganda.

straw-man3Because I have detached myself from puerile and unconstructive popular theories that, if nothing else, do decidedly demonstrate complexity for complexity’s sake can and will baffle, lesser minds caught in the materialists’ web of intrigue will likely find content in my book “heavy going”; if not relative gibberish. Standard interpretations of Newton’s data models only do well at highlighting the insular view of man; his appreciative ignorance. For our current interpretation of gravity, as wrong as it is, the cosmos is further marginalised. Earth bound materialist psychotic infatuation over empiricism responds with “laws” that are expanded ever outwards. Parsing false reasoning, if it doesn’t “work” on Earth, then it cannot be “representative” of the cosmos or vice versa.

However, that said, the Earth is indeed a variation of cosmic processes or [albeit] a product of the vast universe, of course. Thus, logically, scientists need to understand the cosmos and its universe first to gauge “whys” and wherefores” of effects on (or in) Earth. Once dynamics are understood, it becomes obvious that stars are structural prisms, partially highlighted by gemstones manufactured by volcanos. Popularised by the late astronaut Edgar Mitchell (I’m led to believe), Zero Point Field(s) mark the origins of all access routes for that which is behind “space” (sometimes referred to as sub-space). In Victorian times and prior this was called the (a)ether (as evidenced by Teslas “lost” calculations devoted to generating free energy). Intriguingly, the word “(a)ethereal” shows an etymological path to spiritual. Perhaps that is why JP Morgan’s bank famously funded Edison’s material electricity. Before too long this will become obsolete anyway, as secrets concerning cold fusion will be available to every household.

milky-way-artist-eso-finallabeled_edited-1It is worth noting that my earlier explanation for the darkening of the Satan Star lacked a punch line. According to NASA (surprisingly), a deadweight “black hole” (the combined “mass” of millions of stars) is located somewhere nearby (relatively speaking) the Milky Way Galaxy. That, though they do not confirm it, is the Black Sun (which was the Satan Star). It also arguably substitutes the “spigot” analogy the Mayan’s (Lemurians) used to represent a giant torsion field that propels galaxies. As Earth is relatively close to the centre we are not subject to too much momentous inertia and I wonder if we could survive the full effect experienced in the outer reaches of the universe. The Black Sun label intrigues me because [ironically] our sun is charcoal coloured too. It only “looks” bright as an effect of our atmosphere.  Buzz Aldrin reputedly reported thus (under his breath) in utter shock when breaking free of Earth’s atmosphere on the way to the moon.

torsAll planets generate their own torsion fields (partially accounting for gravitation effects and that is why to exit our atmosphere summons an Olympian feat) but the intense pressure of (a)ether bursting into space generates forces of comparatively unimaginable precipitation. Consequentially, when dark matter is added to the mix, chain-reaction implosions generate such highly compressed (much denser than our purest diamonds) crystals, box-shaped doorways rise out of each molten soup. Though stars are not actually hot (heat is an effect of atmospheric combustion) dynamics are unaltered. If a man was to stand on our sun (which is dark in appearance outside our atmosphere, of course) he would literally burn coldly or combust in his atmospheric containment. I am not entirely convinced that a body could not survive or even “not live” unclad in space (but that logic is too afar adrift of competent discussion). Nevertheless, was that to be put to the test, it would take a brave person indeed to act as guinea pig. Space has extraordinary life giving properties and I wonder whether a body’s direct exposure might endure a miraculous morphing.

My reference to black holes earlier does not comply with traditionalism (although it should be stressed neither does Stephen Hawkins own variations, which are loosely described as grey holes by him these days). That is because science interprets the “phases” of a star wrongly. For instance, from truth’s novel perspective, in fact the so-called “white dwarf” phase actually shows light being “throttled” by dark matter. Not enough to fully extinguish the light, so to compensate the lack of overall brilliance, luminance is super-condensed. Even when fully “closed”, the star still radiates, so it is only visually black. Science talks of “black” representing an absence of colour (spectral light). This is incorrect too. There are green-blacks, red-blacks, purple-blacks and the swirling, pulsating abyss representing pure black is harder to look at than white light. So the description “black hole” implies much more than on casual face value.

99312262Also, the term “hole” is rather misleading because the black hole isn’t any different to a normal star. All stars function as portals, or, to use the vernacular, wormholes. Mainstream science opinion is more or less the paradoxical reverse of truth. As with “gravity” real dynamics are roughly the opposite of causally evolved Newtonian-Cartesian thinking and designating black holes power colossal streams of energy and matter out into the universe. My earlier volcano analogy best represents processes. But there’s more. Pulses “belch” giant waves which capture foreign objects in their path. file_794280In the case of the Black Sun (which was the Satan Star) forces are so immense they drag entire groups of galaxies (at stupefying speeds). Even so, those that take the time to understand pulse synchronicity might be able to find a way through each force field “on merit”. Very small objects are able to forfeit this drag factor (and that’s why, comparatively, Earth bound meteorites that penetrate our force field are always tiny). In the mundane planetary sense, Earth is caught in one of the circular grooves rippling out from our sun. The reason it spins is not because of “gravity” (as I explain in my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded) but, rather, forces generated by our internal sun source propel the body like a “dreidel” in its vain attempt to break free of the celestial groove.

I would go further and say this is where (if science was a true art form) theorists would find purpose in complication. The size and shape of a celestial object precisely determines how it will react to or whether it will be affected by the network of interconnected pulse waves that populate “space”. Where any three offset concentric rings meet, a triangular cosmic Venus Fly Trap awaits to ensnare unsuspecting asteroids which, possibly, are held in stasis for eternity. Planetary “rotation” mentioned earlier is also predictably subject to differing dynamics as not all bodies are spheres, as is supposed. In short, our universe is nothing like science imagined it would be like and that has caused the corruption of pragmatic thought in order to satisfy domineering practical ambitions.

bioxshotevilEveryone should now contend that darkness, being absolute matter, correlated with the original description of evil. Dark matter was uninvited and unwelcome (or, perhaps, unanticipated is a better choice of word) because of the zeal of Sophia (womanhood that encapsulates wisdom). Ever since, certain factions have tried to divide the material domain spiritually to be consistent with her ideologies. Nevertheless, spirituality in its most unrefined form is simply knowledge of God (or Sat-an: would not Hebrew materialist-atheists call this the “adversary”?). Materialism bequeaths atheism, of course. The two are unbreakable partners in crime. An absence of God (who is brought to life by the spirited) proposes a more refined dark matter existence decontaminated from the wilful spiritual illusion. Satanism, contrary to popular ignorance, actually harmonised the standard (i.e. standalone dark matter) which highlights the error of Sophia. That consequence (our throttled Satan Star) is the eternal “war” between the wishes of matriarchal (Sophia) and patriarchal (Adam – the material “son”).

The modern cult of Satanism is more closely aligned to “Luciferian doctrine”, but that’s not all. In addition to the Black Sun being worshipped because it represents the success of material (male) power over (feminine) spirituality (light) is an underlying mission by Judaic Pharisees (Satanists in all but name) to reduce existence to abject materialism. Continuing with my history, Lucifer came much later and, as with Satan, “He” is an identity/concept that has been synthesised from an idealism that bears no relation to truth. Etymology of Lucifer points to Latin light (lux) bearer and ancient texts (such as biblical Isaiah) conceptualise origins from the perpetually falling Morning Star. In fact the real “Lucifer” had a phonetically unpronounceable name that approximates the hiss of the desert wind.  He was an archangel and may been [euphemised by] “fallen” Gabrielle.  To be clear, Archangels are “sound beings” (a higher version of light) or logos.

luchadeer_thumbnailTo his credit (and detriment too) Lucifer was the first to decide that Sophia’s objectives had failed and the universe was corrupt. Pleiadian knights went to horrific extremes to preserve what some dub “White light Order” (a derivative of Sophia’s spiritual essence). Invariably societies that welcomed sexual promiscuity and other vices were the targets of profound zealousness associated with perceived spiritual cleansing. Thus, I rather identify our modern ultra-orthodox whims as reflective of a much more ancient, timeless authority. Noxious militant groups, such as ISIS, demonstrate just how garbled the Pharisee’s contemplation has become. Religious materialism is a grotesque hybrid accommodating the very worst aspects of White Light Order. Our predecessors could and did destroy planets, ruin entire galaxies to “win”. Lucifer was the first to recognise that this morality was senseless. Therefore the “survival” model was created. I would like to say “as a replacement”, but that would not be true. “New order” overlapping “old order’s” contorted parenthesis has expanded only as hybrid psychosis. For instance, should human obsession be allowed to thrive, surely the universe awaits in own demise? If the powers behind ISIS and other vile, superficial militias could ransack galaxies, would they refrain from total annihilation for pity’s sake?

conflictsTo Lucifer it was clear that living things enjoy conflict for conflict’s sake. Creatures were given defences, weapons or a combination of the two making sure survival was not a certainty for any individual species (DNA, ultimately always panders to the group). Those with the most weapons in some ways were at the greatest disadvantage as they needed to continually attack to survive. Also, ironically, nature assures the most aggressive alpha males (with the sickly) are usually the first to succumb to plague or disease (also highlighting DNA purges its extremities). Vegetarians were driven to greener pastures for aesthetic reasons or through necessity of avoiding conflict. Everything that existed in living form was prepared for war because war had predetermined functional existence under (prior) White Light Order. For example, the famous allegorical tale “St George and the Dragon” stretches back the best part of 80 million years remembering the destruction of [the planet] Maldek; a tyranny that ensured the slow demise of the dinosaurs (restricted to relocated Earth’s surface). Should it ever be published, I discuss the progressions that fomented the violent war in painstaking detail in my (second) book, “A New World Order.

If Lucifer stood for anything in particular, it would be “balance”. Therefore, “survival of the fittest” is a misnomer. We humans revere mothers in particular. Fathers are seen more as a necessary accessory of procreation but when couples remain intact (usually via marriage), joint matriarchal/patriarchal supremacy is presupposed.  Yet, in practicality, childbirth is the only natural way of renewing human life. Whether procreation was mitigated or accidental, the outcome (when successful) does not alter. Thus, parents are (in some fashion) merely executors of the life generation process (well, as far as human beings are concerned). This means, dare I say, parents are not supreme.  New life guides can choose to be arrogant or humble. Sadly, just about all opt for arrogance (at least partially). Either way, the what-should-be insignificant procreation mechanism has been revered out of proportion. Parents are not blessed with “God status” for merely rearing offspring. Why do they presume it? Death, by comparable pharisaic-materialist edict, voided of spirit, is spurned. Children are processed as slaves by dim witted parents already imprisoned by their (the Pharisees) virtual reality.

gaol18I can go further and say God status is the ultimate objective of the self-sufficient Satanist/materialist/atheist alliance. Globalism harmonises the cult which adopts a Zionist (meaning fortress or gaol [the archaic word for “prison”]) attack force (evidenced by supplants such as ISIS). In particular, materialists have done anything and everything possible to reduce “the mind” to a mortal facet of existence. In a sense this is thematically pharisaic as well because the ancient Pharisees attempted to segregate spirituality or, rather, partition a voiceless “God” from “reality” (Law) which is instrumented by the blasphemy concept. That was but a small step away from fully-fledged atheism. Pharisee (the word) is a virulent version of anarchist (or adverse-order). It could be logically argued that “Satanism” is the antipathy of just order and insomuch orthodox pharisaic Judaic sects that “usurp” are comparably satanic.

sumerianThere is also an uncanny numerological connection, which suggests that Globalist Zionism is the product of long standing adapted pharisaic doctrine popularised by Satanism now but actually stretches right back to prehistoric Babylonian times.  Interestingly, with the possible exception of inner realms, the Earth has been conquered by materialism. However, there is an effervescence that rises from “reality”. In relatively recent times hard evidence has materialised. What we call the “Worldwide Web” is a vibrating, pulsating, constantly changing manufacturer of synthetic (virtual) reality (very different to the perfect [truth] astral version). Globalism has a desperate stake in this revolutionary communication mechanism which has and will continue to radically alter humanity’s retrospective, our one “freedom”. The only way of (potentially) effectively censoring the internet is via the imposition of “world government”. Therefore, in that sense, liberty is lost when the Worldwide Web is no longer free.

Our individual guiding contracts with what can only be described as “the force that binds us all” risk being forsaken. “Parents” all agreed to their tenures well in advance.  All choices were clear and balance reflects choice. Therefore survival is generally synonymous with good decisions. Whether you attack or defend, survival rests on cunning. The most cunning are the best survivors. I have reflected on Sha’tara’s poignant comment (several articles ago) kindly relaying other worldly feedback on potentially “corrupt Anunaki Time Lords”. On one level the information did not make any sense at all, but now I understand [the perspective]. While the Satan Star was the exclusive portal for “white light”, manifest existence reflected that purity. Nevertheless when darkness was added to the “mix”, consequential changes in objective reality would have seemed like “a corruption” by those exclusively tuned to White Light Order. Earth then became the place where “God” (or source) is possibly most completely represented. The material world is the sum of a giant competition between all parts.

timelordsSo “corrupt Time Lords” [per se] is rather unfair, given they were not privy to or (necessarily) wanted any part of White Light Order. It is clear to me, the impartial onlooker, that universal constrictions due to the rift between light and dark caused the perpetual ongoing war between pragmatism and practicality. Both sides were, are and will be at fault because neither is prepared to concede muted existence. That is why the only material “truths” permissible are ones of the correct practical flavours. Human infantile immorality is no better summarised than by the wholesale castigation of “child designates”. Did anyone think to check on the reasoning determining what it is to be a “child”? That lack of responsibility is liberally expanded in the total dereliction of dutiful support towards all group units. Yes, that’s right, in true civil society you would be obliged to support those in need. That world would owe everyone a living. Universal tyranny sets the tone for valiant oppression, naturally. Under the vague terms of atheist-materialism, to castigate someone unreasonably is reasonable.

childhood-innocence-is-a-lieIn conclusion, it would be remiss of me not to discuss the most important sentence I have ever issued. If “God” had wanted to exist “in the flesh” he would have become an unrestricted being, capable of anything with unlimited potential. Therefore, as matter and spirituality are aspects of “anything”, if matter is “evil”, God is evil too. Everything labelled good along with everything labelled evil are parts of the exact same God. There is one simple term that encapsulates the ambitions of Satanists, materialist and atheists. “Accountancy” presupposes utopian order. Control agents can measure with precision, purge that which they deem is unnecessary or unwelcome. Accountancy is faith free. It assumes linear existence. It is devoid of spirituality. For the purists, the mind is but a figment of cerebral function; a mirage to be discombobulated by clairsentients. Per identical authority, childhood can be dictated. If those in power decide maturity begins and childhood ends precisely at the thirtieth year of individual life, then so be it. “Childhood innocence” denies the timeless, wilful mind and that demonic guide stone wholly supports popular deceit. That is why “childhood” is either “the powers” great strength or the Achilles’ heel that usurps the usurpers, but none dare contemplate it and that is why humanity is destined for absolute satanic authoritarianism.

Advertisements

The Mystery of Hu Gadam and Pantheism

Standard
The Mystery of Hu Gadam and Pantheism

nature8Perhaps there are many reasons for my exposing the unbreakable, intrinsic connection between Hu Gadam and pantheism now. Most recently, I have seen an increase in the abuse of the use of the connotation “Lucifer” (a relative of Hu Gadam), so that has definitely enflamed my motives (as I am a truth giver). 40c0de8dc71764052fca5d37fe86afdaOf course the word Lucifer is meaningless without connotation, but I shall check the etymology to try to identify when the corruption began. Well, I’m pleasantly surprised. Its origins, I am casually informed, come from Latin. The words luc or lux combined with fer mean “light bearer”. This, my common source informs me was the common name given to the Morning Star. The same source cites an obscure Christian Morning Star connection with Satan, which I must say is rather interesting. As I inform readers in my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, Satan was a heavenly body. He/she/it was no ordinary star as She [I use in place of they to confuse auto-editor] was the very first luminance (check biblical Genesis 1:3 John 1:5 or Revelation 21:23) to bless the cosmos. The will of the feminine obscured and overwhelmed the male aspect of existence for a while, but when the outcast male discovered the flaw, error came into being (Nag Hamadi: Apochryphon of John). She, our Satan Star, collapsed under the weight of remorse and is now known as the Black Sun which has theoretically been identified by NASA as being located somewhere around the centre of the Milky Way. The so-called Mayans (what the Lemurians became or turned into) knew She was the spigot of our universe as expressed by their water wheel analogy.

morning-starEven so, beyond the uncomfortable fact that everything is one and the cataclysmic enterprise, Satan, has no lateral connection with Lucifer as neither does the Morning Star, all feature through consequence of serious consideration as to what pantheism is and its portrayal of life as a continuous system canonised by its cycles. Last post I emphasised the lack of power human beings convey. Compared to universal beings we are far less significant than atoms. Moreover, we have demoted our potential. Yet, in my book, I boldly state “we are God’s fingertips”. In other words, a single human life (as a complete experience) might feel like gently brushing against ferns while walking in the bush to them (the Gods that we represent). Everything we thought was important, including all those new age dramas expressed as end of world crisis, is irrelevant to them. To them everything will change to suit the cycle and if we have the collective ability to make it so or not, so be it. The new way, while it lasts, will give just as much life and, if not, the weak and sickly will succumb to those with greater power and resolve. Thus, rebirth is stronger and more resilient. That is the process of illumination. Human beings love scapegoats. We can’t face the truth unless it suits us and that is why we constantly seek surrogates for our mistakes. Blame game is the pre-inclination of man.

Robin HoodLucifer, the entity, does not exist, but pop culture conveys messages that are instinctive and clear. There is a general fear shared by human beings. This may be the result of the baggage collected by the group consciousness over the eons. However, no energetic personification (in absolute form) has any relevance. The fear is aggregated fantasy which has been exploited to the greater degree by the creators of illusion (fiction writers, film makers and so on). It is a genre and that’s it. There was an entity, being very much connected to Earth’s inherence and He was a rogue. The use of the word “rogue” expresses its most positive aspect in this instance. I cannot say this roguish entity was symbolically comparable to Robin Hood, for instance, but that would demonstrate how enterprising rogues can mean everything valiant for the human heart. In this particular case, our roguish entity was deeply connected to Earth’s inherence and, in that capacity, defied white light order. He proposed, drafted and implemented an entirely new life cycle system that had never been considered before. It was and is a system that has been famously paraphrased by evolutionists as “the survival of the fittest”. Whilst Darwin’s conclusions are almost entirely wrong and the evolutionists need to expansively redraft their ideas as to what “survival” is and what “fittest” really means, the balance of life is an exaggeration; a hyperbole.

Though the entity in question (our rogue) has an unpronounceable name that partly sounds like wind striping away at crags in a sandstorm, “Lucifer” has been the convenient substitute. There is some malice to this, as the entities that support white light systems are the ones that invariably provide channelled information streams for “the benefit” of Humanity. They know the way they use Lucifer is not comparable to the one of human, can I say, folklore. In my opinion they deliberately transfer the negative connotations to receivers for added impact (i.e. propaganda from the nether regions). In fairness to them (I regularly relay direct accounts of human sloth on my other blog) what better way of pricking the attention than using one of the most historically enigmatic names of all time? Be your own judge, but don’t ever be swayed into assuming that light beings and other guides work exclusively for your best interests. They have their own agendas which promote mutually beneficial payoffs. Over the years I have met a lot of people that were important members of Atlantis society (white light sensitive). As I discuss in 450,000 Years of Unquantified Earth History, the peoples of Atlantis were not human, or, rather, key societal figures (those stakeholders in community interests) were Martians complimenting one aspect of our DNA. Modern human reincarnates tend to assure themselves and others that you (as individuals) are masters of your own illusion. Values tend to predictably replicate white light traditions, such as strict vegetarianism.

dinosaursLast Australian tour (2013?), Sixto Paz Wells, famous for his relationship with fourth dimensional Lemurians (though I don’t recall him identifying them as such), explained how “Lucifer” intervened with Earth’s development. They said that “Lucifer” was an archangel (sound being: sound beings are higher in dimensional status than light beings). He (Lucifer), alone, hatched a new way, a new beginning for creation. The other elders did not like the blueprint, but neither could they find fault nor just reason to oppose it, so it was authorised. Beginning around 340 million years ago (give or take) the life system now known as the dinosaurs changed existence. Blue Dragon Desktop BackgroundI haven’t checked and don’t really care when the palaeontologists claim dinosaurs began to evolve. My sources are far more pure, far more accurate and far more knowing. Putting examining pertinence, precision of dates to one side, it now starts to get interesting. “Lucifer” only hatched the plan, which was complete. Underlings facilitated orders. There is a gap in my source material, but it is easily guessed. I don’t know exactly what commissioned the dragons, but they were the geneticists that manufactured all the new Earth species prototypes using their own DNA catalogue. Dragons now have evolved as fourth to fifth dimensional life forces but will always be cohorts (progeny) of Ba’al (plural). Unlike Ba’al (all unique beings without reproductive capability) they are a species set with numerous varieties. ea6d8636422896800aa69bf7e8fa1097Ba’al is the [group] manifestation of the Annunaki and, therefore, “Lucifer” must be the being(s) the Sumerians called the highest God (God almighty). By deduction He must have been a stage/state between Ba’al and the cubed light Annunaki.

Sumerian devotion would not be understood today. In those times, for the early period, humans knew the power of communion. That changed when the Draco (assisted by Zeta Grey Beings) installed meta-physical frequency fences which acted as limiters on our DNA.  alien-graysWhen I use the term Draco (Pteroids and Ciakars combined), I feel sure this was a control freak initiative and that can only point to Ciakar (reptilian) meddling. Whilst the Zetas offer a chirpy, witty, laid back veneer, underneath they too are patiently obsessive. To the intrepid third party observer, hideous appearance, extreme mood swings and carnivorous sexual behaviour is all that separates the Ciakar from the Zeta. For my analysis, every single recognised Zeta-human channel either wears a powerful reptilian overcoat or has conspicuous viperous guides. Hu Gadam’s influence has been forsaken. We, hu-apes, have been dismembered for our heads don’t understand our bodies. That is why sexual potency is the greatest of all “sins” (sic) and children must be “innocent”.

Though the Pope Lick Monster is another inspiration for this post, there are many tales and artefacts which demonstrate a very different reality to mainstream proprietary history. Goat-like humanoids of different sizes and statures are rare but far from unheard of. A rather strange skull with significant horn protrusions disappeared from an American local museum not that long ago. Other objet d’art have been supressed in different or similar ways. This suggests someone does not want the evidence scrutinised. If that is the case, logic further impresses that stakeholders in the preservation of current mainstream history illusion have the most to lose by allowing scrutiny of potential loose cannons that might break it. In addition, though the Pope Lick Monster is interesting and authentically unusual (I would, perhaps, go as far to say genuine), it is not evidence of Hu Gadam. A more likely cause might be one hatched by the miscreants behind the New World Order and so-called “powers that be”. Be very clear that global politics is controlled from above and string pullers are not-of-this-Earth in the traditional sense.

Pope-Lick-MonsterThere is one photograph I know of depicting the Pope Lick Monster. Courtesy of Photoshop, the print has been coloured and disambiguated in numerous ways. It could be a fake, but it is so convincing it could be natural. Energy signatures never lie but sometimes can confuse readers into false beliefs. In this case, if all viewers that witnessed the image shared the belief it was real, energetically it would become “real” (but only in consistence with the beliefs). Hypothetically, there would be a lingering doubt as all viewers of the unknown are natural sceptics. Per this paradigm, the item that is a fake would become real through consequence of belief only, but that reality would also be tinged with doubt (due to the sceptical nature of man). When I analyse the picture (above) from the energetic perspective, I do indeed find a lingering doubt in favour of authenticity. Does this mean it is a fake after all? No, because the energetic signature could also be its authenticity and lingering doubt might represent the fact the exhibit had been played around with (i.e. enhanced using Photoshop). So, in this case, an energetic reading is not going to be very reliable unless the reader can go beyond the frame of the picture. In this case, for some eerie reason, I cannot dial into it. I don’t know whether they have done something in the creation process (of the creature), but I cannot locate (pinpoint) its DNA beyond drawing superficial character swabs in situ.

When I evaluate physical traits (of the form), I find anomalies I don’t believe could be the inspiration of “Photoshop”. Some of the features would require such patience and tactile craftsmanship, without super-human skills and a massive commercial purse, no one would bother (assuming they had the technique, which would need to be better than any Photoshop evidence I have ever reviewed in my life). Pushing aside the characteristic ears and large horns which are not glued on and the very strange inhumane facial features, the feet and the hands (in particular) are the giveaways as to the validity of this evidence. Remember, I have other skills too. Years ago, I acted as philatelic expert and valuer for a number of prestigious auction houses. If vermillionI was given the unfavourable task of discerning which of the French 1849 Ceres 1 franc vermilions were originals or Jean de Sperati forgeries. The only way to do that was applying absolute attention to detail. I look at the photograph that apparently features the Pope Lick Monster and I find evidence to be congruous. The hands, on first glance, appear to support long talons or claws. This may improve the monster identity, but on closer inspection, the talons are in fact fingers – extremely long, thin fingers (and thumb that sticks out) that are like nothing I have ever seen before. 0aa4fb3a2165c0b10222f822f1de20e1One hand is rather blotted out by light, but, gauging perspective, it is the same as its partner. My eyes do not deceive me. Before me is an extraordinary Photoshop product, far better than anything Jean de Sperati (the forger that fooled the experts) could produce. Too good, it surely must be real.

camel+foot.jpgThen there are those very odd feet: two clear, but probably three “camel” toes which are not hooved. If some imaginative person with skills wanted to create a Satyr, they would surely give it horns and hooves, no? The type of foot is not only nothing like anything comparable (other than the Camel’s) but also clearly belongs. There is no familiar cut & paste smudge. In addition, the monster’s physique is not impossibly human, but very streamline, very authentically muscular. This print must be real and if anyone came forward (including the person that released the picture) and claimed it was a fake, I could only be compelled to bellow, “Liar, create another just like it while I watch you.” Whether its origins are from Pope Lick Creek remains unconfirmed.

satyr_by_artbytravisMaking the well calculated assumption the photograph is genuine, what is the creature? It seems to be a liberal example of Satyr. The legs aren’t very hairy. Neither is much apparent around the body, but as a best case, the Satyr is the closest answer to something known (albeit mythical). According to Wikipedia (a tainted but occasionally useful information resource), there are two spurious references in the verses of biblical book of Isaiah (which, though is hard to date, likely precedes the Greek classical period). In Leviticus (17:7) the practice of sacrificing se’irim (Heb he-goats with the colloquial additional meaning – devil) maybe a derivative of the Arabian legend azabb al-‘akaba (shaggy demon of the mountain pass). Also the lexicographer, Robert Beekes, suggests Greek Saturos may have (I presume) Aryan-Slavic origins, although their “wood nymphs” are called leshii. No SatyrRather than being demonstrably violent, myths have portrayed these creatures as being lewd and decadent, virile and overtly sexually promiscuous. If they were to be labelled devils, it would be as impish fornicating womanisers and not as psychotic fiends.

Conspicuously, the creature depicted crouches over its fallen prey (presumably a man of unknown origin). It scowls at and attempts to strike the photographer. Consequentially, the beast is naked, but not lewd. There is no figurative sexual interplay; no residual energy. This is anger and hate and desire combined; virility yes, but not even a glimmer of illicit passion. This is not the Satyr of ancient Russian and Greek mythology. This is something very different. So what is it? If I carefully review the photographic evidence again, I note that the eyes are closed; perhaps blinded by the flashlight. It is a shame because the expression “the eyes are the windows to the soul” is not an aimless one. The best way, for an energy reader, to securely pinpoint origins is via those portals to holistic DNA. I, we, have been closed off, shut out by the miracle of technology that allowed us to glimpse at this creature of dubious status. Yet, other than the rather oddly accentuated neck region (partially obscured by flashlight), the torso looks remarkably human – a young man with exceptional physique after a workout, I would say. The leg calves are well formed (look at the lightened one carefully), thighs compact. Taking away the bizarre accoutrements, it could be human. But those accoutrements also make it clearly not human. It is a human hybrid.

QaGVU16Who or what made it? Is it one of those noxious black military secrets? Why under the US Norfolk Southern Railway trestle above Pope Lick Creek (assuming that is the location)? Rumours had been circulating since the 1930’s or perhaps prior. The mystery was such to inspire a cheesy 70’s movie. I haven’t seen the film so it may also be serious, exquisitely revealing, but it didn’t ever make my TV screen in my formative years, so I can only assume it didn’t make the grade. It wasn’t very good. But if someone tells me otherwise, I’ll go seek it out. 95791-004-9B0456EBThe point is that knowledge of this (or these) creature stretches back for the best part of a hundred years or, perhaps, beyond. That’s a long time to keep the lid on a black military op. No, definitely, that’s not it. This is something else. I think this is evidence of supposed extra-terrestrial genetic experiments that are actually very much terrestrial (of this Earth). They (the aliens), their power structures, are so much more advanced of us that they can, more or less, operate hidden in plain sight. There is only one group with the skills to produce something like this that might qualify. In my opinion, this is the product of Hu Gadam on the Earth plane. This is an attempt to turn man into something more.

god-fearing-womenDo I see our hybrid as evidence of Hu Gadam at work? Not on your life. We know the Satyr is mostly a happy-go-lucky, boozy pervert that casts illicit spells over God fearing women and girls transforming them into fertile nymphs. Sacrilege (according to the Puritans)! Foto15Hu Gadam would never create a violent, sadistic axe murdering siren. Let’s check out that photo again for more clues. Ah ha, I think you all spot it but do you see? Look really carefully. Look at those strange paws. I symbolically chose the “camel’s toe”; but that ain’t no camel! Anyone checked out the “chook’s feet” of a Ciakar reptilian recently? Look no further. It’s right before your eyes! That is precisely what you should see if you were witnessing Draco Ciakar feet. They love to disguise hallmarks in plain sight that the suckers (human cattle) won’t notice (see), but, albeit with a little help from me, you’ve all noticed. precious-bloodsh1cWe [now] know this is the Ciakar [long standing] ruse as an attempt to make Hu Gadam look bad, appear monstrous in order to deny humans evidence of our Pteroid roots.

Remember the humble beginnings of this treatise when I offered some truth about Lucifer. Did any of you think it odd that he was a light bearer, given the tradition that the biblical Elohim are light beings and the importance of light “conquering darkness” in the selected opening verses of John’s gospel (the one plausibly written by “Jesus” himself)? Might the adroit ignorance amongst “Christians” generally as to the humble etymology of “Lucifer” have some bearing (excuse the pun) on this? Could dark forces (perhaps aligned to Draco Ciakar factions) have pulled a switcheroo to confuse brethren in the Middle Ages or perhaps just after the breakup of the Roman Empire? Once Latin went out of fashion it would only be a matter of time before light could be dark and dark light. In fact there is only one biblical reference that counts, because any other would have simply relied on it for guidance and this proposes an alternative explanation. Isaiah 14:12 reads per my translation:

“How have you fallen from the heavens, Lucifer (note: perhaps the Morning Star); the consequence of your fall has subjugated nations”

satanThe superstitions over Lucifer came about as part of a progressive strategic enterprise designed to cultivate the “right to control”. According to the naïve view, if humanity was only answerable to God, would an angelic heavenly agent dare to subjugate us, innocently or not, he/she/it must be a blasphemer. Because this message is irrelevant and incorrect (permanently lionizing our [fake] sun as “God”), it has permitted eternal debate for corrupt enterprises. It pre-supposes that we are biological robots, incapable of deliberate choice; otherwise Lucifer (as described) would only be able to subjugate those of us with character flaws. At least one interpretation of the implied accrued consequences casts Jesus as Satan. In fact, common sense dictates those that inspired the metaphorical Tower of Babel account worshiped the Morning or the Day Star (depending on which version you prefer) and Lucifer (as its standard) inspired anti-pharisaic licentious behaviour. pharisees1“Your pomp and music of your harps” seems very much in the spirit of Hu Gadam and pantheism, so I can only draw the conclusion that Isaiah, the stiff shirt, was twisted and tortured by the mirth and merriment of others. He was definitely no Robin Hood.

Certainly from the very many and varied references I have collected, this (Isaiah’s attitude) is a noteworthy Ciakar trait. They love to ruin the fun of others, providing it doesn’t affect their own unseemly ambitions. This style of aggravated tyranny is consistent with the Puritan brand of Christianity. For clarity, Puritan synonyms include Pharisee or prig. Those still not clear as to relevance deserve a lexicon reference. Prig means “a self-righteously moralistic person who behaves as if they are superior to others” or “hypocrite”. In addition, the use of the concept of the falling star as a racial divide against the rising run (covert paganism) is a direct attack on pantheism which takes the view that error (fall) is far more important than success (rise). To become the brightest of all stars you must first have travelled the rite of passage. The Phoenix bird always renews more illuminated and stronger from the ashes.

Elsewhere in the Bible we find greater attention to truth and less to hypocritical whim. The ultimate clue is given in Genesis’ Adam and Eve. Genesis 2:19

“Now the Lord God (Hu Gadam) had formed out of the ground (genetic culture) all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man (Homo erectus or Neanderthal) to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature; that was its name.”

godThis is a very enigmatic passage which is made more so by the token that no one understands what it means. It is referring to a genetic catalogue that is crowned by man. The catalogue is so vast and complete it was used to create every single bird and animal on the planet surface and that is why man only had the right to name all his creatures, for they were his DNA. That is also the Hu Gadam connection to pantheism. Nature, in its entirety, not merely the creatures, was created from a solitary gene pool. Everything on the material plane, apart from the outsiders (the aliens), belongs as everything is related through genetic ancestry.  Therefore the celebration of that which is natural and vital is not an option for the truly zealous; it is life itself. That is Hu Gadam’s pantheism.