Moving On With Ken Bakeman Over Christmas

Christmas and Ken

I had planned to release this on New Year’s Eve, at the central point of the twelve days of Christmas. Not being a believer of miracles, I fail to see why any new year will bring in an extra-special bout of happiness. The feature, marked by resolutions, seems a better summary of the human condition, which is to put off much needed enterprises until the very last minute. The season is a bringer of hope and dreams though. Of course, it is hard enough to write Christmassy articles on paranormal themes, but throw in an extra-terrestrial twist and an author pretty much broaches the impossible. When festive paranormal themes do crop up, they tend to cultivate dark or menacing forebodings in ironic reaction to expectant joy. Look at Scrooge in “A Christmas Carol”. Powerful, but hardly food for mirth and merriment, except thank goodness Charles Dickens left us with a poignant happy ending to that, otherwise dire, tale. Was “tiny Tim’s” permanent disability a metaphor aimed at society?

In my ongoing quest to find Ken Bakeman, I have no happy ending. It is still possible to buy his book I am led to believe, so one presumes he or an agent close to him handles his affairs. Even so there has been no concrete evidence of him since his sudden and unwarranted disappearance a few years back. As a fellow author, I know the streets are not paved with gold for anyone writing about exo-political affairs. This has not dinted the will of his supporters at all. Whether Ken has dropped out of the business disillusioned by the lack of riches or something untoward or paranormal has happened, the madding hoards keep pressing.

Statistically my post “Where is the Enigmatic Ken Bakeman?” is the most viewed on this website (according to WordPress statistics). I did create another topical website using the Wix engine not too long ago, mainly as an alternative to WordPress. Prior feedback from followers here posited my articles were too long for competent attention, so I wanted to test and measure the response to pocket-sized entries. Unfortunately the plan backfired as I would have to pay for statistical data from Wix. Having no intention of investing financially, I cannot say whether the project has been a roaring success or an unmitigated disaster.

Has the Mob “Disappeared” Him?

I won’t dwell on Ken’s disappearance. I gave my opinions before. Those basic considerations haven’t changed. There are certainly at least three living individuals named “Kenneth Bakeman” aged 60-ish, currently residing in the US. No other articles more recent than my last one show up on Google. The die-hard quest for Ken may continue resolutely, but it seems I am the only information giver dutifully concentrating on that cause of late.

Christmas precedes the New Year and, traditionally speaking, New Years are all about moving on. That is why many people pretend to make radical resolutions in front of love ones and associates. How many smokers that promised to give up ended up smoking more? Ah well, they will always have the next year’s resolution. I am not a smoker and I keep all resolutions I promote. Therefore, this year is time to move on with Ken Bakeman. Unless something miraculous happens on Google, this may be closure. Mind you, I haven’t read his book, but information of that quality and quantity could foster miracles from a mind like mine. Could I turn his legacy into “Ken Bakeman plus”?

An “Above Average” Website

Many people have perhaps flocked to my website in the premature expectation I might be him. The paranormal is strange enough to permit a weird, freaky, messed up transmogrification event; an event where Ken might sort of, I don’t know, morph into my body. The bad news is it hasn’t happened and I should know, because I am pretty fond of this body. If Ken had somehow sneaked in using his magic hocus-pocus stuff, I’d have been straight on it. Wham, promise! Also, readers will never need to read on too long to realise I ain’t no Ken Bakeman, nor ever will I be. He has a rough, earthy, jocular style that sings like one of those old vinyls. You could imagine him being read on the radio by a gravel throated veteran jock. He’s the combination of Mickey Spillane and Twin Peaks on the twilight zone.

There’s a kind of “I see dead people” quality about Ken. He may not deliver as well as Haley Joel Osment in Sixth Sense, but there is still something gutturally compelling about his style. And those great gravures of his make him the trademark he is. In fact, the visual component of his legacy is probably more inspiring than his writings to many. Without the pictures, his writings would have lost the limelight and flopped in my opinion. He would be “unknown” today, but he wouldn’t have flopped because of poor writing. Far from it; but he would have struggled to capture the inspiration of the few that bother to read at all. Relative illiteracy is one of the great modern symptomatic social ills, arguably the consequence of the video age. People’s attention spans have diminished to such a degree that mostly only cute cardboard memes or action cartoons are deemed “intellectually bearable” to the point of considered comprehension.  The way things are heading, all books of the future will have to be “pop up” to gain any worthy readership. It goes without saying; current would-be-authors are advised to provide at least one salacious picture for every small packed block of text.

The Posthumous Funeral

A follower of mine recently confessed the opinion that his great idol was dead. If this is true, Ken had died quietly. We live in an age where beliefs are greater than truth. Videos and other calculated devices harness whims and turn them into reality. They make fantasy live. Through merit of belief, whether Ken has survived rumour and speculation is largely arbitrary. Belief is greater than truth and if the “belief is” he is dead then it must be so, whether true or not. In fact this style of, dare I say, reasoning has been exacerbated by “science”. Now experiments are not about discovering the truth. Rather they seek to “confirm” suspicions, no matter how ridiculous and clearly errant. There is an entire movement determined to disprove 3D object reality under the reinvented auspices of Aristotle’s “flat Earth”.

I have been known to use a tongue-in-cheek moon analogy from time to time. Were Earth astronauts to have actually walked on the moon, they must have met with red and black dragons. Of course my educated readers will instinctively cry foul. You “know” what I’ve said is preposterous; red and black dragons on the moon? Of all things! There is a mile long paper chain detailing the astronauts’ numerous trips to the celestial body and at least one government sponsored film of the surface landing. It would also be ridiculous to say mythical creatures live there, particularly when any sane individual can see from Mars “evidence” that all extra-terrestrial life forms are identically similar to ones found on Earth.

Actually that’s the fantasy. The truth is numerous aspersions of doubt have been cast on all moon visitations. The movie(s) has attracted volumes of critics. None of the glaring anomalies have been scientifically explained well enough by authorities, as many have been countered with generalities or incompatible modelling comparisons. Conclusively, therefore, until proven otherwise, the “moon films” were produced on Earth, perhaps even by Stanley Kubrick. Reasoning for the subterfuge might vary. Perhaps the astronauts went to the moon but found the possibility of landing and/or filming impossible, or maybe the boffins miscalculated and transmissions generated a signal too poor for uninterrupted television streaming. Alternatively, the planners may have figured the whole project was a disaster waiting to happen, so staged the whole thing in the interests of much more effective “PR”.  That would be fine, but why were the moon rocks fakes too?

Teach a NASA New Tricks

NASA has been very much dragged under the spotlight by the way they have handled the moon landings criticisms, more too by the way they have irrationally tried to deflect criticism. At times their responses have been so garbled they could only be judged as gibberish; hardly a good image builder for the supposed greatest science agency – ever. Rather amusingly I often feel they have gone one better than a [channelled] reptilian philosopher (who will confidently spew seemed utter nonsense to human logic). For prosperity “Never A Straight Answer” has been the NASA’s posthumous accolade with some critical thinkers viewing it as the single most ineptly corrupt of all government agencies. Mars invites scrutiny. NASA sponsored the rover; new tricks by the same old dogs? Given the moon evidence, the only question that needs asking is “where on Earth”? Perhaps high up on the Rocky Mountains (given the terrain) is favourable, but other fingers point to uncharted Antarctica. When life forms “discovered on Mars” are consistently Earth like, the evidence dictates that they all originate from Earth.

Given that the strong consensus (amongst thinkers) is the moon landings were fraudulent and the astronauts never ventured from Earth, I am perfectly at liberty to believe red and black dragons reside there. Once I attract other believers in great enough quantity I can equally turn fantasy into reality, but only while the moon is out of circulation, undiscovered. As soon as the spotlight is shone on the moon, the truth is known, then dragons will either exist in truth or they won’t. By that token, the consideration Ken Bakeman is no more is fantasy. The truth is there is no visible public domain evidence to validate his life or death status other than records of various individuals named “Kenneth Bakeman” that show up on American community censuses; at least three around his supposed age.

One of the advantages of fantasy null existence is prosperous historic legitimacy. Reasoning and logic pertaining to “why” goes a long way to cleansing authenticity, providing all angles are considered and effectively factored into pragmatic equations. Ken has disappeared for a number of years. One logical conclusion as to “why?” is he is deceased. Though myopic in reasoning as no one that isn’t intimately connected to him knows, it is “open and shut”, unlike the moon landings (i.e. the biggest common problem with them and Mars rover footage is nothing was filmed that “couldn’t have been” on Earth). We have no Ken, therefore he’s dead, but does that delineation apply to NASA’s evidence? Extra-terrestrial life forms are always “Earth like”? Might that satisfy logic by any stretch? I think not. Moon rocks allegedly collected as evidence may as well have come from Earth. There were no noteworthy artefacts or anomalies. All that can be said is considerable time and effort was devoted to spinning egregious propaganda determining all sorts of “possibilities” from what amounts to a container load of trash.  I don’t want to apply similar cooked logic about Ken.

Earth-like Moons, Martians and Morons

If the approach was sincere from the start, outcomes would have been very different for NASA. Maybe the moon landings were a great private secret not for public attention. Maybe for some reason NASA decided they wouldn’t film one of those five miles high glassine structures on the moon. Perhaps they were defended. Maybe the astronauts couldn’t find any. Perhaps they weren’t allowed to. Nevertheless, in respect to the “Mars expedition”, why none of the eye catching pyramids (or the “face”) was deemed worth looking at close up and personal defies lateral comprehension. Wouldn’t a rational space agency check those out first? Are they similar, identical to the ones on Earth? If so, what are their origins? Did Martians come to Earth? It is almost as though NASA tried to select the perfect “nothing to see here” place for the rover to survey, which does add weight to the argument that the whole enterprise is a big ol’ heap of phoney baloney.

Ken Bakeman writes (I will not be convinced he’s deceased until I see hard evidence) vividly and I do too. We write differently though. No one could confuse our styles by any stretch of the imagination. He is the jocular, robust storyteller and I am the “odd” philosopher. Everything about Ken is gritty and real even if it isn’t. Everything about me is surreal even when I discuss something tangible. People talk of a delivered “power” in my writing style. “I couldn’t write like that”, snapped one critic (implying I was a total freak and therefore “illegitimate”). From the little I have read, Ken never challenges belief systems. He manufactures them (rather endorsing Jim Elucid’s “character’s write” opinion). A bitter adversary of mine once angrily challenged, “Do you take the reverse position on everything?”

Born Again Christians

In my formative years, as I was growing up, I occasionally encountered born again Christians. They (I was told by my peers and teachers) believed in the “fundamental word of God”. Although this judgement of them turned out to be an exaggeration, I did notice they followed certain ancient, mostly biblical, texts as mesmerised parrots. Someone had told them ancient folklore was the unrequited word of God and, as an authority, it was unchallengeable. Although, upon inspection of the detail, beliefs invariably followed enigmatic lay preachers “inspiration”. Closer scrutiny of these inspirational nuggets showed an undeniable selectiveness as to which of the many “God’s words” available to them were “worthy of repeat focus”. But that was good enough for them, the believers, and, as nice people as they were; nothing would challenge their over particular “expectations”.  I call this conditioned denial syndrome the fundamentalist gene now.

Today I see more fundamentalist gene types than ever before. There are not only Christians. All religions cultivate faithless followers. In fact none actually believe, in truth. They buy particular appealing fantasies and symptomatically profess atheism unconvincingly. The religious have all the hallmarks of atheism overlaid by crafted dogma remotely reflecting whimsical Gods. The disorder has provided endless material for numerous articles of mine. Where to begin? Try “The Great Society Paradox – Action That Defies Principled Beliefs” or “A Modern Day “Love Cult” Assumes Detracting Truths Are Heresy” for starters. Specifically tackling vanity, I even wrote a weighty piece here amply titled, “What is Harmony?”

Ken, Me and Pseudo-Truths

With so much fluff being passed off as pseudo-truth, can the same accusation be levelled at Ken or me? If I might step up to the chopping block first and were my earlier highlighted enemy’s “anti-everything” criticism-evaluation of me to be taken seriously, then reflectively the world would seem very different to “what it is” if my reckoning was used as the benchmark. Let us take the standardised view of gravity, which assumes magnetism of matter creates a drag effect. I say this is nonsense because, if it was the case, the drag effect of giant mountains would be sufficient for us to traverse sheer cliff faces. Assuming the around 200 miles per hour standardised “free fall” speed of unhampered objects crashing to earth is correct, I also challenge the concept that postulates things burn up in our atmosphere. I say the notion is actually preposterous. No friction is experience by sky divers (who, incidentally, oddly feel a great weight on the back in descent) from mile high drops. If asteroids’ “melt” as theorised, I say even high board divers would heat up in some way. Correct understanding of the dynamics of the forces that are responsible for Earth’s gravitational effect would show that only the very smallest space rocks are able to penetrate our atmosphere.

Therefore, putting everything to the test, I do regularly offer almost the diametric opposite of the “mainstream view” where the truth isn’t plainly unavoidable. “The sky is blue today” is an unavoidable truth when the sky is blue. No one, not even the mainstream, can argue it is magenta, sea green or puce without impairing the vision. “Why” the sky is blue is a different debate, but that will have to wait a future entry. More importantly, as the mainstream seems (upon reflection) wholly committed to the manufacture of non-reality, it begs for a much needed showdown. Here we encounter what can only be described as a deliberate manipulation of societies “for profit” and the cultivation of unaware manageable slaves. Beyond the insistence that individuals’ turn up for work and follow a basic [debatably] “moral” code, society is encouraged to behave irresponsibly in wilfully ill-spirited fashion. People are groomed to follow “look after number one” diktat which preserves the food source (corporate employer) in spite of the body.

My articles are mostly very long but always very clear on meanings and reasons. I cover enormous historic periods with enterprising authority. Messages don’t deviate except when I’m correcting myself. Be it there are giant gaps, voids between eras and eons, there is still a high level of overall congruity. My “snapshots” of the Anunaki, Dragons, Pteroids, Ciakars do not vary. Though histories don’t directly lead into each other, they are explained relatively “in context”. My strange history of man, the alternative end to Atlantis and even the definition of what “Atlantis” is/was (i.e. Martian origins, resettling almost the entire [what is now] northern hemisphere on Earth) are written by one that seems to have “remembered” it. Some have commented on the fact. I don’t make this stuff up. Reflectively, memories may be selective, but they are also secure (when coming from a place of honesty).

Unexplained Unconventional Memories

Ken Bakeman goes through the exact same routine differently, of course. For one, his memory is in the moment. It is vivid but there; proto reality. Everyone can empathise with this, because he relays experiences as they are perceived. The reader lives the fantasy. Ken is Kirk, Bones and Spock on the Enterprise; new lands, characters and exciting creatures await every fresh instalment. Anyone who has read anything by Arthur C Clarke or thumbed “The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe” by C. S. Lewis will have been transported to like vividness. J. M. Barrie’s “Peter Pan” brings material to the immaterial at a place called “Neverland”. Narnia, Wonderland, Neverland are all fantasy realms; the imagination brought to life, would-be reality made real.

Therefore, even in the most outlandishly misleading fiction, truth actually hovers remotely, ever teasing the conscience, perhaps under will of the enterprisingly effervescent. Some people have the gift of tuning into this effervescence; “seeing” without eyes if you will. The technique is called different things: clairvoyance, channelling, divining, soothsaying, prophesising. There are numerous words, but all refer to the same basic process. Discrepancies occur in the numerous routes or paths to truth.  These lionise perspective to such a degree that one truth might appear so different to the alternative view (of the same truth) that accounts would be judged as direct “opposites”. One person says the glass is more or less empty and the other claims it is more or less full. Who to believe?

A good example is the way I perceive the intellectual Venusian Mantids compared with Niki Reinert’s spiritual versions (I outline the outlandish differences here). Would the humble house fly view humans as unconscionable “monsters” given the lack of inter-social cooperation? Honestly, I don’t think they would give any of us “spiritual beings” a very good reference in front of the Creator. There is an underlying energy that consumes everything that is and this gives away these connections. Insects have an uncanny knack of picking up on it. To give an example, years ago, I lived on a first floor apartment and sensed tiny German cockroaches were transmitting welcome to me. A mild, telepathic “we love you” wave surrounded me for a number of years. I tolerated them even though I would irrationally attempt to kill large flying “bugs”, their cousins, on sight.

Sweet Insects and Their Extraordinary Taste For Telepathy

It was only when they had eaten the solenoids in my ansa-phone and I noticed them wriggling around inside the display of my microwave and video recorder that I realised things had gotten out of hand. They had accumulated in the hundreds. Never had I seen such an infestation anywhere else. My flatmate filled a vat with boiling water and threw in a surface covering that had a good hundred insects attached to it. That was the only measure needed. Within two months of the attack on the group, there were no German cockroaches in my apartment. No chemicals were used against them. They just left because they sensed my will had turned against them. I no longer wanted them there.

The point I am trying to make is, we presume we are superior, but perhaps nature has a lot of hidden qualities arrogance permits we overlook. Perhaps there is magic in 3D too, if someone desired enough to notice. Awareness of the energetic haze that connects everything exponentially increases with extra-sensory dimensional range. As much as our scientists try to pretend otherwise, 3D gives us extremely limited perception. Indeed, as I explain in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, 3D would be better categorised as 2D for illusory “flat worlds” and “line worlds” don’t exist. This can be proven mathematically. However, I also argue that prior to shifting into 3D, colour was likely perceived only as monochrome (or a simplified spectrum), pitch and tonality severely reduced and temperature ranges would not have holistic all-consuming potence.

Conventions, Truth and Exo-political Manoeuvres

Conventions go a long way to validating superiority. If we were all guided by truth alone, none of us could accept anything on face value. We would each become investigative journalist, historian and detective wrapped as one. Conventions allow particular messages, those cause validating, to give the group congruity. In a sense each authentic source is given license to instil tradition. Does this mean that if Shakespeare said it it must be true, because he was a “genius” and almost divine? Perhaps Shakespeare is a bad example as he was a playwright; a manufacturer of fantasy. Then again; is not Charles Dickens’ “A Christmas Carol” so vivid it seems real? Scrooge has become an icon in his own right. Mention of his name to any westerner conjures instant common understanding. That Dickensian traditionalism has been instilled in us all since birth. Other cultures have different but equating brands of social identity models. Ineptitude is somehow transcended by the power of certain collective instructions; all but effervescent manoeuvres.

Some writers on exo-political matters stand out. Whether in good faith or through cause of ambitious persistence, many in the fringe “public eye”, the popular personalities, end up pretty much spinning the same old warped messages. Tired half-truths go from one to another like worn clothes. Often the purest information is found in “off the cuff” remarks, the ones that almost slip by unnoticed. Why did he say that? That sounds interesting! Even so, proto-mainstream paranormal is pretty predicable, when tunes and rhythms are familiarised. Things go bump in the night, not ghosts. Enigmas are far and few between.

When someone like Ken Bakeman or, dare I say, me comes along, everything changes. Like desert whirlwinds we run amok with traditions, ransacking familiar structures, leaving only fundamentals intact. Some label us “disasters”. Others view us as breaths of fresh air. In very different ways we stand out or “stick out”, depending on individual reasoning. Ken might be better compared to Simon Parkes or Alex Collier without the “tangents” or farfetchedness. He takes you into a world that is unmistakably his. It’s new and fresh and exciting. He somehow turns Neverland, Narnia and Wonderland into reality. And it’s a reality that continues to expand with ever more exotic creatures waiting in the wings to be discovered in new instalments.

Humans Draconian Common Ways

Even so there is vitality about his writings that conveys honesty. Such is the effect on his readers, Eva Draconis was moved enough to embellish his thematic material. Did she not write her own take on the great Pterodactyl (which, incidentally, is the genetic heritage of all the Pteroid lineages up to Homo erectus) after confirming she had been inspired by Ken? She is important in her own right too. In one piece she mentioned that when reptilians consume energy from live humans, to them it is like “drinking juice”. Do we not receive taste infusions when adding freshly chopped live herbs to foods we eat? Who has been reduced to tears by a soppy love story, become paranoid after a realistic horror movie or been exhilarated when witnessing a new Olympic record in motion? We are very similar to them, but perhaps the ways to gauge those similarities are too subtle for the modern-day arrogant know-it-all.

My writings could not be any more different than Ken’s. Some might try and compare me against David Wilcock or Nassim Haramein without the “science”. Others could argue I am a politically ambiguous Michael Tellinger. More than one follower has suggested I may access the same basic information “sources” as Michael Tsarion. I am told we are very different in very similar ways, like humans and Draconians, I guess. There have even been one or two that have suggested Mark Passio may be an “associate” of mine, though I don’t get the connection.

Ah for the power of “Google”! I constantly try and back up “what I think” studiously. Every day sees enormous amounts of data checked and processed to cross-reference ideas.  In searching for some material on Passio, I discovered a little Bibliotecapleyades hosted article on the “Alpha Draconians”. My own writings on the Alpha Draconians, notably Ciakar reptilians, are extensive (though much not revealed publically). Never before had I seen any physical source validating my information on Ciakar genetic origins. Jim Euclid, a character unknown to me, on 8^th May 2012 announced to the world information that implies Ciakars are the product of Tyrannosaur DNA via “Capella ancestry lines”. Though he fails to mention it, Earthlings (reptilians) regard telepathic (and telekinetic) Tyrannosaurus Rex as the first Earth man.

My New Year’s Resolution

Being persistent, I needed to find out more about this mysterious Jim Euclid, given the importance of his information. By a strange trade of fate, I stumbled across a short article of his titled “Characters Write, Authors Dictate”. That was it. That was the difference between me and Ken Bakeman. He builds memorable characters that write meaningful memory. I dictate. Even so my style is excessively erudite and, in places, powerfully sentimental, readers are caught between two poles. My stories menacingly hover, never quite materialising. For the open minded, what I say is compellingly plausible, often well-reasoned. Closed minds hate me, but let’s face it; they are beyond hope, beyond conversion, stuck on the vinyl for prosperity.

A strange idea occurred to me. I have now written two lengthy articles about Ken Bakeman, never reading any more than small snippets of his own work. Does that make me closed minded too? I have the advantage of being able to hook up to Ken’s DNA and can read his holistic print eternally. However, sometimes perception is more important and, in doing the mind meld thing, I (in many ways) lose Ken. Remember, earlier I exampled Niki Reinert and her connection with the Venusian Mantids? Records accessed through her showed very different accounts of their physical presence and reason for being. That is an undeniable dichotomy. Had I missed something? Was it “me” or was it “her”? Thus, there is only one way forward to do justice to Ken. I must buy and read his book. That is my fortuitous New Year’s Resolution.

Blacks, Whites and the Greys

I have taken a few weeks break from writing in order to recharge batteries. Perhaps also my rest period is partly motivated by the fact that I am becoming increasingly disillusioned by the wilful arrogance of people in general. People that possess those dreadfully devious submissive superiority complexes I find particularly irksome. At least Hitler had the balls to be clear on who he was. A typical ploy of those without minds is to conjure guilt by association brandings so, to be clear, complimenting Hitler does not mean I am his admirer. In fact I see the horrible truths of the NAZI legacy that largely pass unnoticed like bats in the night. Sadly there has also been a staggered lack of comprehension as to the simplest of concepts I have revealed. In place of joyous enlightenment my wisdom has largely been greeted by an entrenched angry ignorance propped up by illegitimate fantasies. Ignorance is never an excuse, so I neither forgive nor forget. The Gnostics correctly called this type of conceit forgetfulness.

For the forgetful, once genetic resonance shifts to the fifth dimension and above, beings can take any form they want. What is difficult to understand about that? Most like particular body designs, whether that be snakes, dogs or amoebic blobs, but if every entity decided they would look human; they would become humans to all intents and purposes. Bodies are actually “worn” something like clothes. The only real way to distinguish differences between unrelated entity types is through assessment of individual character. Sadly humans are not very good subjects for this style of analysis as we have one of the most complex, convoluted DNA catalogues in the universe. Additionally, due to the various hybridisation phases/batches over 125,000 years, the human genome has accommodated just about everything in existence in some way and comprises innumerable “races” contrary to popular myth.

I have stressed on many occasions, both here and at my other website, that there are two fundamental human conditions. At one end of the scale is selfishness which governs the necessity for trade (or there would be all-out, persistent war I fear). The other extreme is a theoretical universal love that only persuades unconditional cooperation. This love is theoretical because, due to what can only be said are our flaws of temperament, every single human instinctively hates (whether real or “on face value”). Or to put in more abrupt terms; to be human is to hate. For those that struggle with this apparently wilful accusation, consider your own loving responses to those who steal from you, might harm or murder you or ones that commit repulsive sex acts you distinctly detest? Honestly, can you offer them, those you instinctively hate, universal love? True love is simply unconditional acceptance.

I have yet to meet another individual truly without prejudice. Yes, plenty pretend not to be judgemental, but deep down, when push comes to shove, in response to the truth rearing its ugly head, every single person I have met has turned out to be another hater. Some are particularly well adapted to the craft. They forge careers that elevate venting anger professionally. It is a bitterness that is because it is at the core of their beings. They literally love to hate. It is in their blood. All the while they say they are “persecuting for good” to morally justify their existence. In reality they hate because that is what they enjoy doing. Whether initially for love or hate, human actions must be driven by principles. Without principles we would be as vegetables. Nevertheless, it is when principles are governed by prejudices that hatred flourishes. A rigorously principled existence is an arbitrary one free of emotional entanglement.

All humans belong to groups. Group views have some influence on individuals. On a more positive note, this ensures some humans learn to “manage prejudice”. The net effect has helped to bring our species group closer to the universal love (remember love is acceptance and not some pithy infatuation) state. Those completely free of prejudice find it impossible to hate. Love simply becomes a way of life. Perhaps I can use the ambivalent term selflessness as a substitute for “prejudice free”. Selflessness is the opposite of selfishness. Therefore, all humans sit in that huge grey area located somewhere between selfishness and selflessness. We are neither entirely selfish nor fully selfless.

This entry is going to focus on the Greys or Grey Beings and these, in many ways, epitomise the extremes that govern our behavioural poles. Grey Beings have no emotions. Humans do. There are nice and nasty Grey Beings. The nice ones are misunderstood as they have been predominantly misrepresented. For instance, every single human, with scant explainable exceptions, is given five senses to tune into existence; making existence rather black and white for those that don’t think. Grey Beings have different sensory perception and this means they rationalise reality in a refreshing, non-human way. Even so, human Grey Being separation potentially isn’t that great as the human genome is vast and includes just about all alien genetic markers.

It is likely, though I haven’t confirmed it yet, we are all part Grey Being but only possess fragments of their DNA. I can confirm there is nothing humans can’t potentially be. Relish that power submissive superiors. Reflectively, links to extra-terrestrial genetic lines hidden in our genome can be evidenced through those that demonstrate other senses not so commonly expressed. “Sixth sense” is the generic label used to describe many of these sentient abilities. Due to this heightened perception, it must be said that Grey Beings (as do extra-sensory humans) have a skewed view of reality compared with what I determine is normal. Of course “normal” is bandwidth too, but its range is so narrow, for instance, I can predict most action/outcome scenarios from the very sparks that craft normalcy.

Existence morphs into something else. Issues are perceived differently. That which offends most humans might not be understood. Some things we take for granted are extremely offensive to those that perceive differently. All the rules change once the human sense of morality evaporates. The nice Grey Beings are incapable of murder, yet they have the most dangerously advanced technologies in the known universe. If they could murder, the Draco would no longer run Earth as they would be annihilated. They can and have incapacitated primitive humans, but always for virtuous reasons. This has not made the memories and fear recollections of abductees any less poignantly disturbing. Strange creatures with eyes that seem to bore holes into the very core, the very soul of being, are not welcomed by deeply prejudicial haters that value “self” above all.

Predictably, the Greys have been given a bad press. There are other reasons too. Notably, unfortunately the nice Greys are regularly copied (cloned) by extra-terrestrial groups and used for far from honourable motives. Whereas the human genome is vast, theirs is very specific and makes very good hybridisation “filler”. Phil Schneider allegedly met one of a number of ghoulish products at the Dulce underground base. This facility, if it exists, is a joint venture operation between manifest reptilian Ciakers and US strategic stakeholders. In fact the beasts that attacked Schneider, colloquially known as Tall Greys, were a failed experiment at hybridising Tyrannosaur and Grey DNA. In more recent times, the surviving thousand (or so) that live in subterranean caverns are dying out as they are unable to reproduce naturally. Their creation was a Ciakar project of course.

Ciakers are regularly mentioned in my articles as they are the fathers of humanity and represent dinosaur legacy of the Draco. They (of all so-called extra-terrestrials) predominantly have the greatest active involvement on the human plane. It is difficult to determine whether the, much more ancient, Pteroids have anything more than a cosmetic interest in us. Dracula myths (expanded by Bram Stoker), werewolves and moth men sound like hallmark accounts of Pteroids, so it is clear they do dabble, but I find no evidence of anything more than that. It should be stressed though that both genetic lines have a much better understanding of God than humans do. Given the various religious abominations that drive faith (sic), we have zero understanding of God and that is why atheism is going through its renaissance right now.

I present the real God in my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” and not some clapped out branded religious concept. The real God is the intent and determination “to be” to the max. Everything (including nothing and something that might be best described as “nothing plus”) is God. In order to express, parts can cooperate or conflict. Humans chose conflict because the majority of us are haters and that is what we love. Ironically, or perhaps not, the Grey Beings were a previous incarnation of man prior to “Big Bang” (an awesome universal energy surge). Then existence was emotion free and driven by logic and reason alone. It was only after Big Bang that the Annunaki appeared, introducing the emotional plane. We, humans, are the lowest link of their genetic lineage.

Perhaps in deference to the Annunaki; humans vent a psychotic arrogance. Let me explain. Take the atheists; are they not arrogant? How do you think the great controller, God, would react to those parts that dare call themselves “atheist”? Correct, He would class them as bad product unable or unwilling to participate in His plan. Upon expiry (the phase we call death), those that believed they were non-believers would be removed and cease to be. For what possible other reasons would there be a need for these blasphemers? They showed no respect for the creator or the exalted processes that hail existence. God’s response (as creator) to this is both logical and reasonable.

I must say atheists are either extremely brave or extremely stupid in their individual suicide missions. In fairness to these poor, stupid, beguiled nerds, this syndrome is a hangover from Atlantis times. Let me explain. Every single human being has “Martian” (i.e. human in appearance but not) DNA. That specifically allows us to think in the way we do (as evidenced by the cerebral cortex) which separates us from “animals” (check out the Adam and Eve story in the biblical book of Genesis). Atheists “theoretically” have thinking minds, but their thoughts have become corrupted by their arrogant superiority (i.e. if God exists, man is inferior). Nevertheless, leaders of Atlantis made human obstinacy look like a child’s tantrum. Theirs was so focused it was frightening to behold.

Arrogance and cooperative acceptance are opposite ends of the exact same scale, so friction with the Grey Beings that apply utopian reasoned logic to everything naturally ensued. Some reason and logic conflicted with the prejudicial parts of Atlantis wisdom. This meant there were regular wars against the Greys who, due to their passive nature, could not physically retaliate. Their only defence was to exit or turn the force on itself. As they are time controllers, their passive defence could be far more devastating than attack from lesser opponents. Thus, the leaders of Atlantis predictably miscalculated strategy outcomes on a number of occasions and that fomented into an even greater hatred against the Greys. Nevertheless, external politics were involved which complicated resolutions either way.

Historically, Lemurian (another humanoid type) kings have always used the Greys as advisors. Next to the Mantids (survivors of Big Bang), they are regarded as the most invested in cosmic wisdom. For those unclear on what the Lemurians are, our aborigine-Indian races reveal their most up-to-date manifest versions on Earth. These tribes demonstrate a bravery and artistry that perhaps separates them from other human types. It should not surprise readers (given the additional information) Lemurians were mystic warriors. Arguably they have inner Earth old form populations. To the naked eye, I shall try to describe the body type succinctly. Having rather strange box shaped heads, angular “reverse coat hanger” shoulders, ungainly, gangly frames towering as much as a metre above the height of the average human, they would be a sight to behold, though, unmistakably, human-like.

For a long time, over 100,000’s years, the Lemurians acted as Plantagenet Kings for the Annunaki after the leaders of Atlantis betrayed them. Even so the Lemurians had a very strong relationship with the peoples of Atlantis and welcomed them back to Earth after the Mars disaster around 35,000 years ago. Observant archaeologists will notice all the foundation stones of the Great Pyramid of Giza are of Lemurian architecture. Many of the crude ancient mounds scattered around the globe are the ancient (and far, far older than most would believe) legacy of their constructions too.  When the enclaves of Atlantis (including all the human tribes) were forced to exodus back to Earth, the Greys still acted as advisors for the Lemurians. Consequential politics that ensued seemed to heal old rifts between the leaders of Atlantis, because when the Lemurians were almost wiped out by a comet strike that dented what we know as the Pacific Ocean (creating the two deep troughs) around 22,000BC, the Greys reverted to governance of their peoples too.

It was only after the Ciakars returned to the Earth’s surface and conducted joint venture genetic operations that prompted the great Atlantis technology city when trouble reared its head again. This time the Greys were forced off planet and resided on a tiny Earth moon listed in the Vedas as “Falla”. Many fail to realise that three moons used to orbit Earth. Our cosmic science is so poor it’s almost pointless. We do not even know why planets and other astral bodies “orbit” yet (according to that resource). The path Falla took around our planet was very strange and it almost touched bodies at one point in the elliptical cycle. It was in that precise position the leaders of Atlantis used a special energy weapon to shatter it and, of course, well, that infamously and spectacularly ended Atlantis.

The Greys had already seen (predicted) the event and were gone out of harm’s way. In modern times they are the ones that supply oracles with the technologies and know-how to create transcendental messages encapsulated in what are “so-called” crop circles. The leaders of Atlantis were up against a vastly superior mindset; in some ways beyond the imagination. Thus history has shown that the attackers achieved nothing less than to wiping out the mega-city they used for their joint venture operations with the Ciakars. In addition, that destructive act chilled half the Earth’s surface for thousands of years. Preserved snap frozen mammoths and other creatures are still being dug up from the Russian tundra. The consequences did not end there. As Graham Hancock pointed out in one of his books, it needed a hammer to create “a giant flood” (represented by more than seventy independent ancient legends). That hammer was Falla whose collision with Earth had the effect of detaching our planet’s crust (about two hundred miles thick at the maximum point) from its core. It took but a few thousand years for it to slip to create the immense flood of legend.

As the Greys had assisted the Ciakars to activate the Earth’s crystal matrix earlier, there should not have been any animosity against the two species. However, reptilians believe in tit for tat, eye for eye. Who happens to be right or wrong is deemed irrelevant. From their perspective, the Greys caused the incident by provoking the leaders of Atlantis into attacking them. The outcome was Ciakar agents were caught up in the mess and suffered dreadfully from the consequences and they’ve blamed the Greys for it ever since. Nevertheless, unlike humans, Ciakars are not vindictive. They are opportunistic. Thus, the reason a treaty was made with the Mantis was mostly to act as a bridge between them and the Grey Beings, who they partner with. Subsequent from the end of Atlantis, there have been numerous cooperative ventures with the reptilians. One was the creation of Zeta-Draco Grey Beings to lead re-ceded humans after the great flood of 10,583BC. Most recently, I think, has been the so-called “Philadelphia experiment” fiasco. Time skip consequences are still being suffered today (not that anyone notices!).

The complex Ciakar-Mantis network demonstrates the caution of the Greys. They don’t ever seem to directly liaise with the Draco on projects. For instance, in the case of the Philadelphia experiment they partnered with Zeta-Draco hybrids (I call Futczhi) as far as I can ascertain. There is some credence to consideration that human abductees might be used as facilitators of an ideas exchange program between Zetas and Draco, given that all humans are part Ciakar (whether they like it or not). There are many the grey areas as to correct origins of man, but, more importantly, specific genetics can be tweaked into muted activation mode (similar to safe mode on computers). That way the Zetas can cooperate with Ciakars without risk of any negative proto-physical ramifications.

We haven’t achieved their level of genetic manipulation, so this will seem like make-believe to empirical scientists. Even so, given the right keys, our bodies can be tuned to become anything any when. I have elaborated before on how the leaders of Atlantis could manipulate the backend of matter to change frequency resonance of atoms. Suzy Hansen has also talked of her Grey hosts’ ability to literally switch on or off particles’ energetic fields. She whimsically describes the living experience as “everything going black”. Perhaps the Greys are black and white after all!

What is Harmony?

Every now and again proclaimed clairvoyants boast of having met with famous historic personages. Whether characters are real or their fantasies, business is mostly the same. From the cosmic perspective (which is immeasurably displaced from human vanity), to be famous is not to be important. So why do the charlatans keep massaging their egos?

Personally knowing luminaries and the behind-the-scenes characters that cultivate prestige, I have come to realise the timeless relevance of fame is overblown and would be best attributed as a feature of human desperation to affirm predispositions validating the perception of importance. By this determination, action is far less worthy than accolade, or, to be seen to be doing invariably trumps the actual “doing”. There is a general superstition that assures connection infects. Logically, apropos, the more stars, luminaries and famous people in “frame” would immeasurably improve the reputation of any low light seeking “prosthetic” fame. Thus, per that reasoning, to be singled out and called on only by famous people empowers credibility creating a sort of sacred status for those in the spotlight. Why did all those famous people exclusively visit little me?

Like the three wise monkeys, the real stars invariably come and go unannounced, unseen and unheard. Demonstrative talent that is out of tune with a given age may collect dust covering hidden treasure for discovery at a distant, future period. But, even then, due to the hereditary parasitic narcissism of man, legacies are certain to be tarnished in some way. There is always some hangover as a response to the incongruous hatred of past conceited critics. Humans are at war with each other, constantly. The great group, surreptitiously organised by “the elites”, is attempting to create “one view” (which is labelled “Globalism”).

Per that vision, everyone is either “in tune” or “out of tune”. For Globalism to succeed, it needs in tune citizens. If the vision stands a chance at working, out of tune anarchists must be expunged (which can only mean eradication). In this case, citizens are law abiding, whereas anarchists are anti-establishment. Measures are dictated and usually facilitated though populist conventions. Other than the New Age smokescreen constructed by the United Nations, harmony is not a consideration. Therefore, Globalism must be and is symptomatic of reptilian authority. As there are no noticeable reptilians in plain sight, this covert operation can only be administered by hidden overlords.

Nevertheless, this particular blog entry is not going to be about fraudulent psychics or those ever present Draco reptilian cloaking tricks, though I may offer a few tips as I go. Here, the focus and inspiration has been music, the senses and how much we take for granted. For instance, as a concert trained classical pianist (my channel will be updated at some point), why wouldn’t I occasionally daydream what it would be like to meet with and hear the great Franz Liszt, Frederick Chopin or Ludwig Beethoven play their instruments and vocalise their unique crafts? Given the comparatively tiny populations of the time, why did the nineteenth century produce so many memorable artists, whose exhaustive compositions output is the legacy?

I happened to mention famous composers, which is not evidence of my own parasitic narcissism. There were a great number of lesser known romantic period composers that have left small, individual legacies. Yet, as much as I evaluate the alternatives, I keep coming back to the big three; Liszt, Chopin and Beethoven as the creators of particular genres which go beyond music. Undisputedly, the Spanish composers’ Albeniz, Granados, Russia’s Balakirev all had their own sounds, but for the German style there is either Liszt or Beethoven. Spanish, Russian, American, Italian mid-romantics still reproduced either Chopin or Liszt genres.

Some might argue that Schumann, whose lyricism is similar to Mendelssohn’s, is different. But I disagree. Even Liszt struggled to break free from the influence of Beethoven. Schubert and Brahms never did. Much lesser known composers of the ilk of Thalburg, Kalkbrenner, Fernz and Weber only ever produced Liszt, Chopin or Beethoven genre music. Educated readers will notice a paradox. Friedrich Kalkbrenner applied to tutor the child Chopin, who was certainly also influenced by John Field (attributed as inventing the nocturne before Chopin was born) and Johann Hummel. Weber and Kalkbrenner produced musical fusions of Chopin and Beethoven. Beethoven clearly referenced Muzio Clementi idioms, but the big three created the genres.

Without appreciation, music would have no value. Appreciative judgement would not be possible without senses. Because they cannot escape them, credentialed scientists have acknowledged sight, touch, hearing, smell and taste. Many others have gone unnoticed. Of course, clairvoyance is often jokingly labelled the sixth sense. If scientists took the joke seriously, they would be able to distinguish between clairvoyance, clairaudience and clairsentience. Other more rational senses impinge on Globalism’s grand vision for mankind. Discernment has no role in a world populated by biological automatons. That makes it a pretty interesting sense, because it demonstrates some have it and others simply, well, don’t. This, in turn, does not make good for uniform society. Could talent, God forbid, be the product of discernment?

In my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” I go into detail. What is the difference between a sense and an experience? Are all experiences sensed? Before serious scientists consider these, existential building blocks, such as dimensions, densities and frequencies must be reviewed and understood, in depth. There are many conflicts of information when delving into realms that cannot be experienced directly. For instance, via extra-terrestrial channelled sources, some say there are but ten dimensions, others reveal figures in the hundreds and still more place no limit on possibility for dimensional states.

Right off, I dissolve the mathematical argument that holds theoretical straight lines, areas and objects are not aspects of the same perceptive illusion. “Object reality” is precisely that and all dimensions (from the mathematical perspective) are only associated with 3D. Variations come in other ways, such as colour, intensity, temperature, sound and so on. Wave forms, in raw state, do qualify as a separate dimension, but this [in many ways] is more flexible and complete than our own 3D. Should it be called 4D? Correlating with physics opinion, there is only 1D or 3D. “Flat realities” simply do not exist, except as features contained within the 3D environment.

Returning to the question, “what is harmony?” We know harmonics relate to pitch and harmonies are musical cadences. Harmony, therefore, is a sound vibration. This is important as there is an entire dimension created from what we call “audio waves” only. Included in this altered state are light variations at different frequency (pitch) levels if the comparison was to be made with Earth plane existence. In an earlier entry, I reflect on the ancient practice of communion. Back in Atlantean (from Atlantis) times, large groups of people synchronised music to channel massive energy resources from the centre of our planet. Why doesn’t much more than a trickle of the vast suppositories of molten lava supposedly contained in Earth’s core that geo-physicists babble about interrupt the calm lives of surface dwellers? The “Greek” Acropolis and other ancient sites are much, much older than people would imagine. Little be known, but these are the legacies of man’s negotiated connection with God.

Frequencies are very important. For instance, the Vedas claim [3D] creation is 0-20 hertz. Others associate certain pitches with magical healing properties. Ironically, I met with the aspiring energy healer, Leah Briers, this week and we fortuitously had a heated debate over senses, particularly in relation to vanity. Passion is an important part of negotiation. Flimsy, well-meaning positive affirmations invariably obscure truth in deference to goodwill. We pondered the question; do those that instinctively tune into fashions have a special sense? Vanity in the way of narcissism featured as my reasoned response. “Vain”, in that context, of course, is a dirty word and this is where discussions with Leah broke down.

I, correctly, emphasised that the appreciation of beauty was vanity and, as such, demonstrated narcissism in mankind. Yet she, though the word was not referenced, stressed the determination that aesthetics go way beyond the surface. As a complete expression, her point of view revered the intrinsic connections between the appreciated vision and all-inclusiveness. This could be anything but vain. Beauty is referenced “in position” against that which is not noticeably beautiful. It turned out that we were effectively debating the difference between ignorance and sensitivity. We, at last, agreed that ignorant beauty is everything shallow (perhaps dysfunctional given the lack of esteemed congruity) and intelligent aesthetics consumes functional depth (essence). She talked of her mission to integrate shadow (dark) and light. Undoubtedly, disciplined attention to her interpretation of aesthetics could achieve that.

Expressions of appreciation can turn into conflicts. Taste in music is an excellent example. If I was to occupy a room that had one of the great Beethoven Symphonies as background music and was joined by another person, we might react in very different ways to the listening experience. Assuming the symphony was well rehearsed and exquisitely performed, for me the listening pleasure would certainly be bliss whilst the other might endure “hell on toast”. Taste is not just simply divided by, shall we say, ignorance and intuition. Intuitive people are selective and I, personally, find much modern music (particularly the varieties that favour discords that don’t resolve) abhorrent. Others love it. Culture wars are most commonly fought over pictorial art. Numerous well versed spectral opinions are the legacy of sane judgement. People are different.

Communication boundaries make effective consideration of animals’ views impossible. There is no way I could relate to a dolphin, a pigeon or even a lowly chimpanzee (which, science tells me is almost a genetic cousin of man). Nevertheless, that does not alter the fact that I could sit in the presence of a wolfhound, for example, and hear nothing while it was tantalised by a special rhythmic gigue created outside my audible range. Perhaps I could train the dog to alert me when it expressed enjoyment, but, even then, how could I be absolutely sure my training methods weren’t flawed in some way or the dog wasn’t a versed liar (for rehearsed deceit, listen to just about any of our politicians)?

The other issue is, because I, personally, don’t hear it, does that mean there is no sound even though the dog acts as witness? This is something that goes beyond discernment, but it is a good example as it demonstrates the non-uniformity of nature. Lack of uniformity means I do not necessarily have to correlate with other human beings either. I can experience things no one else can, because I’m natural. Through fault of Globalist establishments rejecting pantheism as a consequence of the collapse of the Roman Empire (which was integrated into what has become the Vatican powerbase), United Nation’s hybrid New Age Catholicism is little more than a commerce planner for “Big Pharma” and other superficial population control mechanisms.

Are countries anything more than migrant brands? Constant displacement and reassignment may eventually create one race (a cacophony of hybrid genetics). The people are not adapting to the plan in the way the elitists want. Jewish microcosms within societies have largely set the standard. The repatriation regime has predominantly had the effect of splintering existing communities to such a degree there is no common voice, only multi-cultural mobs in constant conflict. The Jews, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists and so on want their specific brands of order otherwise never the twain shall meet, so mafia communities occasionally erupt either against “Order” or social competitors. Perhaps the most noteworthy example is how the Muslims have reacted to perceived threats after the [so-called] 911 event in America; hardly harmony?

Is not the burqa the most vehemently grotesque artefact of tyranny? God is found in nature, so if Mohammed’s modest dress command was to be obeyed, where practical, the absolute is an absence of clothing and not an aesthetic device purely designed to scandalise lust. It God was anti-fornication we would have been genetically modified long ago. The burqa is nothing more than a veil of censorship. It is no accident that Pharisaic fundamentalism adopts a similar practice. The self-proclaimed “apostle” Paul applies dogma with clarity. “For if a woman does not cover her head, it may as well be shaved free of hair. To avoid disgrace, she will comply” (my adapted translation of Corinthians 11:6). The Judaic orthodox counterparts aligned with the Pharisees offer large wigs in place of scarves as their means of censorship.

In fact, there is a great hint that God is not anti-lust as expressed in the biblical Old Testament book of Genesis. “Adam and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame” (2:25). Though the Adam & Eve passage is confusing as “Eve” is presumed to be “Adam’s wife” (which is not so), it categorically states that appropriate lust and nakedness is God’s will. Sentiment is reinforced per the “fall from grace” where God voices his displeasure at “man and woman” (not Adam and Eve) becoming ashamed by their nakedness. The tree of knowledge is blamed, as a routine gesture of pharisaic infiltration, but this actually symbolises something out of context. Eve, essence of humanity (as opposed to Adam, essence of ape man) possessed alien genetics not disposed to natural Earth. Human cannot survive on Earth naked, whereas Neanderthal (man) can. Humans are sensitive and man is not. Readers that have been attentive will discover outstanding though unsettling ramifications from this information.

The elite planners that created this modern mess have demonstrated an absence of sensitivity too. This leads me to question whether it is a sense. For instance, if we argue sensitivity is susceptibility, then adroit scepticism is the diametric. Scepticism, atheism, materialism and capitalism have collectivised to become evil partners as all elitist driven policies accentuate aspects of them.  Though no effort is spared in ridiculing transgressors, the New World Order is shown up over and over as a failure as a social model. It is shown up because it simply has not worked. Elite egos have been bruised as a consequence. So much so supremacists might favour the eradication of the human beast as an improvement on the current course. Will this encourage Armageddon?

Even the most insincere observer can surely rationalise the paradox: elite humans’ hell bent on destroying humanity, including themselves? It is not at all representative of higher powers either, if factions of the Draco are seriously considered as overlords. Pteroids simply would not bother with the subterfuge. It’s not their style. Ciakars do not only build empires, but have a long history of overt and covert control on (and in) Earth. The closest approximation of their character set can be found in the behaviour of cats. That is why their nocturnal version of Earth plane “humans” (these live in subterranean caverns) sound like felines. The Polished Knob video channel on YouTube offers a catalogue of numerous genuine original sightings. Language is strong in the selected clip but I do not hear the trademark Grey’s “call”. Other clips do present visual and audial evidence.

When the reptilians infiltrated and controlled Babylon, what did the people worship? Cats, of course!!! Earth kings of beasts on land are all varieties of cats, with two possible exceptions. Bears are low vibrational genetic cousins of Neanderthals (Pteroid “man”). Others from the Pteroid branch include the jackal-like White Draco and elephant nosed, floppy eared scouts. From the same gene-set, terrifying dogs represent their other supreme predators. Indeed ancient folklore promotes mythical dog headed humans (Cynocephali) which have either not been discovered or suppressed by modern science. Even in recent times, there have been claims of sightings of werewolves. Though no photographs exist for my research and most videos are easily rationally explained as incorrectly describing known phenomena, the stills from this (2015?) Brazilian CCTV footage are most intriguing

Yes, a little ritualistic Ciakar terror (they call fun), I can accept. Paedophile networks and masonic snuff rings may be so, but incidence would be too rare to interrupt our wider populations’ state of mediocrity. Assumed logic might dismiss these infeasible accounts, but that has not hindered zealous accusations to accrue and stockpile, creating clandestine pseudo-chronicles over time. Targeting easily excited feeble minds, many tales also find sanctity in the horror folklore genre designate. The serious side is very bitter with constant politically motivated attacks against Catholics and other strategic figures as routine propaganda. Unsurprisingly, no hard evidence has ever publically surfaced to validate any of these alleged scandalous malfeasant practices. It should be noted that hearsay has been a very effective tool in its use against political enemies. People have gone missing and others have made claims. Those claims alone have often acted as judge, juror and executioner with nothing to back them. It is almost as though the medieval inquisition is alive and well again.

Medieval chastity, chivalry, symbolism and even poetic philosophy are systematic of reptilian intervention on Earth. One of their own most potent emblems depicts the fleur de lys (usually in royal blue or scarlet) which means eternal life. Inquisitions are very much their style too. I have made some progress with Eva Draconis’ “The Orion Project – Real or Imaginary?” From her copious notes, it becomes apparent that reptilians (although most of the characters introduced deny being reptilian) have paradoxically split personalities. Call it instinct dictates they want to torture and kill any worthy chattel. Conscientious humility assures they must have permission from each victim. Not only that, but our fearsome tormenters regularly succumb to pity, particularly if victims are too willing and eager to be the sacrafice. If that isn’t sweet, I don’t know what is! Theirs is a society, it seems, literally divided between dominant masters and willing slaves. However, the differences compared to human order are considerable. Our slaves are not willing and never will be and that is why harmony is such an alien concept for human beings.

Holy Christmas Communion

aAfter receiving no contact from Eva Draconis for several months, I began conjuring unfavourable scenarios that potentially scoped a conspiracy against talents that were able to connect with the Draco, in particular. My prior tribute to Ken Bakeman, sadly, conclusively agreed with the rumour mongers. I find it inconceivable that he has retired, found other things to do, but let us hope that is so for his sake. Of course, more fancifully, perhaps he has been taken on an extended extra-terrestrial adventure and the patient would do well to wait on his reports of strange, faraway places, systems so alien they might make Nirvana seem real. Christmas Day this year, out of the blue, I received an explosion of e-mails from her, so the good news is Eva is still very much with us and more than this has completed her second book in the meantime.

The Orion Project (Part Two): Noah’s Ark is another weighty tome, consisting of over 500 pages (even taking out the introduction). Almost opposite in character to, say, my own “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, it is another account (as an extended dialogue between parties) of Eva’s numerous sessions with various extra-terrestrial/extra-dimensional visitors. Though she records each interaction with, in a way, clinical indifference, some of the subjects are so extreme that the reader is instantly transported to another place.  With an ever accruing book pile, in the virtual and physical sense, I still haven’t completed the first part of her extended interviews yet. However, I did give my e-version of Noah’s Ark a cursory skim for this article and noted that one is drawn to their (the Draco and other “reptilian” types) morbid attachment to accolade. An honour system mingled with, what seems to me to be, adolescent sex is the preoccupation of the first segment, after my casual glance.

In response to being badgered for two or three years by my mother, my father eventually plucked up the courage to sit down with me and discuss the taboo subject of “sex” when I was fifteen. “Son,” he said in a strident voice, “it’s like riding a bike.” And that was it. No wonder the human condition is so out of tilt with nature. To achieve Holy Communion we must be in synch with the exterior and Christmas is no better time to stress such matters. Thinking about the intricacies of the reptilian view on sex, to them intercourse is advanced to an art form. Let’s face it, what usually happens to a shoddy, poorly constructed house? Sure, it stays up for a while; maybe 100 years, but then it’s “crash” and a big pile of rubble. There are 1,000,000’s years old monolith structures that look so fresh; they are assessed as only a few 1,000 years old by “science” (sic).  Reptilians know good sex produces good product. So no dad, may you rest in peace, sex is not like riding a bike. In fact the de-sexing of humanity (why adolescent sex is being promoted as the root of all evil) is a big part of the oppressive control measures that have been imposed over the ages on oblivious audiences that I expose in my latest Ozzie Thinker Christmas post.

My most current read is Alexey Trekhlebov’s doorstep, “Legends of the Phoenix: Tales of Forgotten Past”. Analysis of some sections will feature heavily in this article, but I would like to do Eva justice and promise a fuller account of her new book at some juncture. Nevertheless, the Noah’s Ark biblical theme is very topical as I would like to discuss the Hebrew influence on Christmas and, more importantly, why. The discovery of the Nag Hammadi scrolls and other Apocryphal texts (pre Constantine’s 394AD purge) demonstrate, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that Hebrew Gnosticism is original Christianity (perhaps evolving into Arianism; from Aryan and Iran)  and the various offshoots of Roman Catholicism are all versions of pagan sun worship (hybridised with acrid Pharisaic doctrine). The persecution of “Christians” began immediately after the fall of Jerusalem and destruction of the temple sometime around 70AD (opening the door to cosmopolitan Zionism with the abolition of democracy – the Sanhedrin). The royal Jewish-Roman historian, Josephus, was the wandering cleric (between 66-69AD), whose incognito travels under guard (disciples) are documented as the ministry of Jesus. Of course, those that have studied the synoptic problem and understand the metaphorical and analogic complexities of ancient writing styles realise answers are far from simple.

Hebrew is Judea and the Hebrews are the descendants of the tribe of Judea (so a supplementary question might be; how “Hebrew” are modern Hebrews?). Vedic-Aryan wisdom did not think much of them and that word translates (rune) to mean something like wicked, apostate; something eerily similar to Khazar. The language that is attributed to the people of Judea certainly is not theirs. It may have been given, but, knowing their character all too well, it was more likely stolen. Hebrew is a cut down cosmic script which is infinitely flexible in structure and ideal for the chronicler. At various points, here and on the Ozzie Thinker, I have tried to demonstrate the same Hebrew-Pharisee mindset has engineered a spirituality free reality devoid of faith. Debunking, atheism, materialism, good science (which is anything but) is all part of that picture. Instinctively they argue that if it is unknown, it must not exist and, by extension, if evidence is fleeting, intangible, these must be tricks of the light. Unknown, of course, is no evidence of non-existence. If so, should all the sight blind people rebel and revolt against those that see, insisting there is no colour or form in reality and everything the sighted suppose is a trick of the light too? For the Cyclops’ (I am aware of the Greek metaphor attributing third eye awaking, but work with me please) that dare attack those with all eyes open, who do you think will win? Could the blind vanquish the sighted under any circumstances?

Trekhlebov devotes an entire chapter to Hebrew “character” in his book and that is my first exhibit, if I might be so bold. Before we start, for those caught on the wave of anti-Semite nonsense, the natural Semites are Arabs (which means to be free). I hear no outcry for those sick, impoverished, war smashed peoples for the interests of Zionism by those (supposed) Hebrews who crafted their assiduous double standards legislation for the Zionist Anti-Defamation League (ADL). Besides in his sarcasm, Trekhlebov redeems the mighty race and cannot understate how stupid they are. After reading “Catechesis of Hebrew in USSR” twice, I understand why the tribe of Judea inherited the title “the chosen people”. They are everything humanity should be. Trekhlebov, in his ignorant zeal, revealed a blessing. He exposed the beauty of Judaism, the perfume of the sweet rose exuding from their thorny structures. Good Hebrew’s merely need to dismantle the tyranny to find goodness, but there is an easy way, the third eye way, to do that. Has everyone heard the expression, “if the terrible bear won’t journey to the mountain, then let us create a mountain of it from ice”? We must freeze out that evil sentiment with the babbling pure spring.

Naturally “Catechesis of Hebrew in USSR” contains a lot of information which, in part, duplicates ideas, but even taking this into consideration, I can only present a fraction of the content for this article. To make things more interesting, in tune with Trekhlebov, I present as though I am a Hebrew trader. Also, after considering the kosher ceremony very carefully, I could not help but observe evidence of the reptilian Draco, which is next on the list of points. There are others that will be highlighted as items are raised.

Hebrew peoples love to help each other even in hatred. Power is unity and this guarantees cordial success. Team spirit has ensured we have stayed alive, increased in numbers and become stronger. Nationalism and protectionism under the guise of support are the tools to success. Other than blood ties, Judaic philosophy or religious zeal only applies when necessary. Ensure strategic relationships with key personnel are based on an honour code with strong perks or bribes for compliance. Over stress the importance of the nationalism project (Zionism) to up and coming generations to balance disillusionment of our senior members. Build up the hope, beliefs and reward the youth. I might note here that this is a Draco reptilian principle too. They idolise the young to which end it is perhaps socially more advantageous (they don’t have our sexual hang-ups) to be juvenile for the strong.

The world is cruel. Well, the Draco live by that motto, too. Never think about or have compassion for “the other”. This, also, is a strong reptilian belief (depending on the variety; others are deeply compassionate too. Though, it must be said that this compassion is a form of cowardice and not at all brave or resounding). Incite divides between other communities and aggravate them when advantageous. Well, these Hebrew peoples must have been eaves dropping the underworld. In a different way (to Zionist nationalists), once again, it precisely summarises Draco character. Never analyse or succumb to profound insight. Instead, generalise and rely on abstracts whether relevant or not. Chameleon reptilians are renowned for channelling babble through third party human intermediaries.

The emphasis (judgement) must always be on strength and never weakness (i.e. “Better be poor and happy, than wealthy and sick” to “Better be healthy and wealthy than down trodden”). There are some other distinctions between Hebrews and the rest: “Act according to the Law for that is your duty”, “Death is preferable to loss” (win at all cost). Whilst they apply great cunning to their resolve, Ciakars (reptilians of the tyrannosaur genus) are also determinants so parry with the Hebrews in some fashion. We own everything (as per God’s Law) and only offer it on temporary lease until we decide to take what is ours. Well, that absolutely sums up the way Draco “order” categorises humanity. Our enemies are lazy, try to work too quickly (when motivated) and become consumed with [petty] problems in trying to fix everything to “win the great victory”. We focus on small problems. One at a time, once fixed, the big ones are sorted without specific attention. Our enemies can only subordinate. They are jealous and their hearts are filled with hatred against their successful brothers, Give a subordinate the opportunity to sabotage his betters, he will jump at it. It cannot be overstressed; here summarises the fundamental difference between human and underworld cultures. America’s will to win was smashed long ago by the hatred of the downtrodden. What could have been the jewel of genius will be reduced to a desert of mediocrity. They (Draco) love their betters.

Banish all arbiters, mediators and democratic reformers. The weak and those that stray from the group deserve to be purged. We care not who is worthy or right; only backing the winner. Ethics simply hinder progress and poverty is just a wakeup call for those with aggressive determination. Feed lots of misinformation to keep our enemies perpetually confused. These Hebrew standards partially satisfy Draco societal objectives, but, for instance, democracy is so alien to their sense of being, they do not comprehend it even when explained (to them) laterally. Taking their feedback, they question how there could be true democracy with such a hotbed of differing opinions igniting any given cause. Democracy, as far as they are concerned, is still about “winners” and “losers”. Carrying on with our Hebrew wisdom, feign poverty, illness or anything that wins the “pity” card.  Immediately cut ties with those that are not useful. On this the Draco would differ. There is never necessity to cut ties, in their view, as everything boils down to management. A Draco channel is always eternal. Agree with any philosophy and even “change faith” if that will improve the current course. Only you can see what is inside your heart. Marry into strong gentile stock; the “calves” are our blood rite. Give bribes and trinkets to secure the land. Do everything to influence public opinion in our favour. Who is not with us is against us.

We now know what the biblical book of Exodus was really referring to with Aaron’s golden calf symbolism. My friends, that is the Hebrew key to globalism and utopian control of the Earth (and beyond). Nevertheless, the best Judaic evidence of Draco intercession can be found in their kosher preparations. I have toned down as much of the blood thirsty/curdling sentiment as possible, but readers please be prepared for some very violent unsavoury depictions. Though this account is taken from Trekhlebov’s paraphrase of writer-publicist Christian thinker, Vasiliy Vasilyevich Rozanov’s (1856-1918) memorable article on the Hebrew kosher ceremony, I struggle to believe anything behind closed doors has changed at all. The basis of this account was relayed by a dismayed and profoundly affected Russian veterinarian.

“I saw procedures of killing sheep, claves and one year old bull calves…It was striking that I did not merely observe simple (standard) cattle slaughter, but some hierurgy (rite)…Bible offering sacrifices.  These were no ordinary butchers before me, but, [rather], ecclesiastics, whose roles were strictly assigned. The main role belonged to the slaughterman, of course, armed with a piked blade and a couple of sturdy assistants. The animals awaiting slaughter were held in standing position by these brutes. There were other [men] in place to close the jaws of each beast. A third group was there to collect blood in sacrificial vials. And finally, a fourth set to brandishing holy books, which accorded the correct prayers for the ritual hierurgy.”

I will spare blog readers details on the actual sacrifice, suffice to say it in some ways approximates what the Arabians valued as the worse possible lingering end; death by a thousand cuts. To emphasise the contempt, Trekhlebov illustrates examples of these practices conducted on an industrial scale, all animals drained of life, creating rivers of blood (this same effect was reported as the account of some of the 1917 Zionist Russian “revolution” purges. One writer claims a large swimming pool was emptied of water and used to collect the blood of the executed Aryan-Slavs. It was not too long before it was full to overflowing. Another talks of [Arian] clergy being boiled alive and served to their brethren). Their book of Zohar (from the Kabbalah. This source for English translation offers the disclaimer “Without proper grounding, one can easily be led astray by the Zohar…”) explains the correct method of slaughter. It is a massive work and I cannot find this reference (II.119-a) which appears to refer to the kosher method used to slaughter gentile humans.

“Their death (gentiles) would be as the death of some animal, which dies without voice or speech, with fastened jaws…killed with 12 tortures of the knife and with the knife (blow), making 13 (strikes)”

That is why, principally, 13 is their (the Jews) unlucky number. It signifies the final death blow. Another reference highlights the comparison between Draco objective and Hebrew culture.

“It depends on the spiritual source of the [kosher] food, which we learn is that of Other Side”

Reptilian warriors prefer the blade as a weapon (quick, silent and effective – Ninja style). That is the major irresistible symmetry with the Judaic ceremony. Kosher preparation, therefore, can only be an abbreviation of Ciakar ritual. As this is the foundation of the culture of the tribe of Judah, there is no doubt original sentiment for Judaic instruction was offered by Draco overlords and adapted over time. Noah’s ark, which is celebrated as the final bastion of salvation for life, was anything but. It was in fact a slaughterhouse factory proposing a different ritual for every animal offered. Insomuch the dreadful structure should be remembered as the beckoning echo of death and not the salvation of man. It highlights how ignorant and befuddled believers have become. Because fluid myths that cultivate untruthfulness are expressed by the very same influences that first attempted to control and then successfully overcame the global populations, man’s cowardly, lazy, self-serving nature has been exposed and empowered by their ever expanding fabric of lies.  That is why the Draco have long remained hidden but always close to the surface for those with all eyes open.

Trekhlebov lists a good number of examples of lethal Hebrew violence against gentiles over the ages. Some of these citations seem very similar to the kosher ceremony where each victim is securely bound and gagged and receives a number of cuts or “pricks” before final death. Whereas I see some symmetry with Draco methods, here several differences are highlighted too. For instance, a reptilian deadly assault would always be swift if death of the victim was the objective. However, they also have a reputation for feasting on live flesh. They call this ravaging. Paralysis can be induced using holographic technologies, but, in a sense, this is the same a tying someone down securely. The main separation and acute difference is the gagging. Why on earth would the Draco do this? The noise is the best part of their “fun” for each sound vibration has different qualities/properties in higher dimensions. Indeed, there is an entire existence frequency structured only from sound and this looks like any other light version. I discuss these matters in depth in “The Existence of Beauty Decoded”.

In fairness to Jewish readers, please do not fret. Hebrew atrocities are scant indeed (and each has been met with an overzealous response in retaliation before 1880’s after which attitudes started to soften for some reason) compared with those done in the name of Christianity, which, over time, Trekhlebov estimates has wiped out one fifth of the world’s populations: all in the name of faith. How disgusting! Be it problem inciting string pullers have invariably been “globalists” (or “Zionists” but not in the Jewish sense), Christians have a lot to answer for. In fact, returning to my original discussions explaining the background to the massive objectives divide between Catholicism and Gnosticism, all the violence can be attributed to hybrid Catholicism (which is hybrid Zionism), such as King Henry VIII’s “Church of England”, Luther’s Protestant doctrine and so on. Although, it must be said that most alternatives to Catholicism do not endorse transubstantiation; wine is wine and bread is bread, which is a move towards gnostic Arianism. Compellingly, Catholic communion is Draconian is character. It is strange, perhaps, that Eva Draconis’ Red Dragon partner/guide, Hamish, informs us Roman Catholic Cardinals are all Draco (assets). Other sources tell me the same situation applies to the corridors of power in Washington and Israel, but I don’t think that will shock even the most pragmatic sceptic.

I said earlier that Trekhlebov errantly exposes how stupid the Hebrews are, but some readers may question; how so? The mistake of the Hebrews is not to realise they are common and ordinary humans. Do they not breed with just about anyone? Wasn’t it recently announced that the not too convincing gentile Russian Tsar-President Vladimir Putin’s daughter married a Jewish banker? By a bizarre stroke of love, the apparently gentile ex. American Tsar-President Bill Clinton’s daughter also married a Jewish banker (whose father was a jailbird fraudster, lest we forget). Now I wonder if they are Khazar….Hebrew…..er….same thing? All this mixing genes was recently sprung by the Genome Project. There is nothing that particularly substantiates the Hebrews from any other human. Sure, the diehards keep referring to consistencies with Jewish populations and certain haplogroups, but these contain verified gentile stock too. Oh woe; why not change the word “Hebrew” to “human” and make this planet great again?

The Power of Communion-ism

Human civilisation has progressively evolved to an age of totalitarian science-atheism. The fact standards are based on philosophies that embrace so-called materialism is no accident. Indeed, rather, it has been a prerequisite for the planners. They knew, once atheism was formalised, God was dead and humanity could not experience magic associated with ascension.

A background to breeding

Even today the importance of bloodlines or “breeding” is ever-present, particularly in the higher echelons of societies. Doubtlessly, this is as much about protecting “hereditary” fiscal interests as genetics, but would it really matter if a commoner entered the fold to become rich beyond his or her wildest dreams? Fiscally no, except possibly in terms of behavioural management. Those that research the rich and famous, royalty in particular, regularly find marriages are engaged for genetic reasons, so this cannot be entirely coincidental.

Given the mountain of propaganda that passes as “history”, I have a dilemma. Surely, the elite bloodlines must be impressed by some of it? But equally, surely, they must be a little bit common too? According to the mainstream account, bloodlines uphold breeding which ensures the correct measure of responsibility for management of fiscal affairs. This is routinely supported by special education. In other words, commoners are taught differently to the elites. There are many dedicated schools and colleges. Some impose an entrance exam, but as elites are not necessarily any more intelligent than commoners, there is always the option of buying into credentials.

The perplexing question, for me, is; are the elites taught an entirely different version of the historic development of the universe and ancestry of man?

A deep history and interconnecting past

My long awaited and unfinished book, “A New World Order”, discusses precisely this. The deep history of man long predates the Earth’s own creation. Indeed, Robert Morning Sky’s enigmatic work, “The Terra Papers” points out that, originally only two planets orbited our sun. A very, very large Earth competed with Mercury for solar space. That was it! An original sun preceded and overlapped the current one so, for a long time, explained later, we had two suns until one burnt out.

The Terra Papers barely mentions origins in the Orion’s Belt. There “Earth” was at least 40, but maybe up to 100 times its current size. It deposited most of the materials that were used to create today’s solar system. Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Venus are all pieces of “old Earth”, although it had a different name then. In fact, modern day Earth is the remnants of reconstructed Tiamat. According to the Ganymede (Jupiter’s moon) based Lemurians, Earth doesn’t exist as a new timeline was created after the destruction of Tiamat. Yeah, crazy stuff!

To think of an individual planetary land area, a continent, that is so expansive it would equate to the entire surface area of Earth or more, blows my mind. Monstrous domains of this type might well have supported the kilometres high gargantuan “men” Enoch describes in his pseudepigraphical texts. If everything is based on scales, then the size of men might directly correspond with the geometric volume of each planet.

Mankind is spiralling out of control

I talk about the six versions of human preceding us, each respectively downgraded for abuses of power. To be brutally frank we, “Version Seven”, appear to have learnt nothing. This is why I wonder whether the elites have been taught real history or if the illusion is projected like a veil designed to consume every “thinking being”. Do even the three sorry individuals at the very top of the pyramid know the truth?

Fortunately, a few with all eyes open do turn up to guide mankind periodically (though God only knows if their messages have any impact at all). If we take the destruction of Tiamat, recreating Earth, well, that event collapsed the solar system. Suns don’t die instantly and ours took 1.3 billion years to finally disappear. The problem with the existing one, the sun we know and love, is it distributes black light. The Zeta Grey Beings were so concerned on how negatively this was affecting the psyche of man; they attempted to disconnect our electro-magnetic field in 1943. Their hi-tech procedure went completely and disastrously wrong. Historically, it was recorded as the Philadelphia Experiment.

Why disconnect the sun’s energy field?

As I explain in my e-book (which is now being distributed in a printable version), “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, the sun is a lot more than a light source. Put in the simplest terms, its electro-magnetic field manages our DNA. Want more details? Get the book. Thus, if the negative spectrum is being accentuated in the build-up to ascension it would mean a greater tendency towards individualism and personal sovereignty than communion.

Agreed, mankind is broken into complex social herds, but individuals merely manipulate each group’s goodwill for their own parasitic ends. If there was a clear antipathy to communion it would be sexual abstinence. That is why successive attempts at global supremacy have seen sex as the greatest threat. Sex is not an individual pursuit, but promotion of systems recommending unions of any more than two would see the death of individualism.

Imagine a world where the normal friendly ways of greeting were all varieties of sexual intercourse (look up the meaning of the word “intercourse”). Take away our age restrictions (incidentally, most are in place as “control mechanisms”) and society would be unrecognisable. Children, while we are on the subject, should be equal parts of society. Social responsibility would mean they are everyone’s shared obligation. Gone are the maternal/paternal slave masters, though parental bonding would continue to flourish. Also, a lot of people overlook the power of sex, but more importantly, the implications of prohibition. That is why the hippie sexual movement of the 1960’s was so damaging to globalist framework. Indeed, they were forced to rewrite plans between 1971 and 1975 as a consequence.

Real Communism versus faux Capitalism

The modern day version of Secularism has followed the lines of Zionist inspired anti-defamation, although, unlike the Israelite instrument for control, members are passionate about eradicating interference (here is the British Society). High Victorian versions blossomed into, what is now tritely termed, Anarchism. Anarchists, surprisingly (for those that bother to inspect the detail), pushed the idea of total liberty for humankind. What dreadful thugs? (being sarcastic)

You see how the Medias play with your minds?

Back in the 1870’s, because these weak minded terrorists (sarcasm again) saw value in sharing things; elevated communities, Anarchism attracted the new stigma – Communism. This, in its current form, had been invented by the bored industrialist economist, Karl Marx, published as a manifesto in 1848-49 as a churlish fantasy determining council (presidium) administration of just about every facet of life. Later forms in Russia and China were used to test the effectiveness of Globalism (i.e. the control of all peoples using one arbitrary body).

Louisa Sarah Bevington and James Tochatti, to name a couple of notable commoner thinkers of the 1880’s (though much of their sentiment is labelled pseudo-science now), were libertarians. But if the term communism is to be taken seriously, it would emphasise communion for the goodness of the group. Globalists, empowered by the traitor Marx, made sure that communist people were starved of liberties to benefit them.

Jose Arguelles communion telepathy experiment

Jose Arguelles is a character shrouded in synchronistic mystery. His life and works, perhaps, deserve a separate post or posts. Largely most famous for his interpretations of Mayan wisdom (notably partially deciphering their enigmatic calendar), he is said to have believed he was the reincarnation of the 7^th century great sage, Pacal Votan.

For this entry, I would like to focus on his participation with the Noosphere II Project which is devoted to triggering/managing a global shift of consciousness (particularly after the, though erroneous, 2012 “catalyst”). Driven by Arguelles (who, sadly, died mid-stream in 2011) in conjunction with the Russian Academy of Science (its branch ISRICA) was a global telepathy component.

There is more to this than immediately meets the eye. Telepathic communion is the only way humanity can break free from the hold of the False [light] Matrix. Next to me (sorry for the idle boast, but I can’t resist it) that made Arguelles the most enlightened (human) being on the planet. Once we, as a unit, can achieve connection at that level we will not only be given unimaginable powers, but will be ready to ascend. The problem is; it’s all or nothing because “God” is not a Racist. I quietly laugh at all those “powers” with their tinker-toys. If only they knew all they had to do is let go and they would receive riches and rewards that would surpass the imagination.

False [light] Matrix for other-worldly controllers

Following on from my earlier example of negative influences directing progress of our DNA, there is another important facet of man’s development. Version Seven human (us) was a critical branch from Annunaki order as we are a combination of Ciakar and Atlantean (Version Six) human. Because we (humans) were created by them [and are consequential subordinates], the Draco (Ciakar/Pteroid cooperative) have taken a keen interest in our development, most specifically, as “stock”.

It would be unfair to say they view us in the same way we treat livestock, for instance. But, as their “order” augments slave/master social/family status to the letter, conflict over sovereign rights would quickly meet deadlock if their governance of us was even slightly transparent. Spiritually, contrary to popular tittle-tattle dressed as wisdom, they are vastly superior to us. Nevertheless, we want our sovereignty.

To control flows of human thoughts (and sometimes intercept and disrupt threatening developments), a very ancient (maybe 600 Million years old) methodology leveraging the Earth’s crystalline support struts was adapted. Not-of-this-world technologies monitor every single human mental exchange. Consequentially, the Draco have constantly manned surveillance systems that work in a vaguely similar way to our backward HAARP technologies.

A battle over stock ownership

The embryo of our initial hybridisation (there have been various waves that have not been successfully deciphered by the Genome Project, thus far) 125 thousand years ago led to an almost immediate violent war between the Draco and Annunaki (who, theoretically at least, own all Draco genetics too). Were we not saved by the Atlanteans (who shipped us off to Mars out of harm’s way) there would be no “human race”. I discuss this in greater detail in “A New World Order”.

Due to an earlier conflict, the Draco had been banished (or restricted) to inner realms and only ventured to the surface when the Annunaki were away for significant periods (often thousands of years). After we were created at times of absence they appointed Lemurian Kings (who were of the Zeta Grey Being genus) to mind the fort, in light of Draco interference.

However, 35,000 years ago, the Annunaki famously (according to the Sumerian mythology) caused a great flood and left Earth for good. That “great flood”, incidentally, submerged North Africa and went all the way up to the Caspian Sea. 24,000 years ago Lemurian control ended with the catastrophic meteorite impact that turned the continent of Mu into the Pacific Ocean (what is on sea bed?).

Reconnecting with the “Gods” to bring on the magic

The Annunaki, in many ways, never left. They are energetic beings that are not able to manifest in our dimensional plane other than through us. Telepathic communion will awaken the God within us and activate magical properties of the Annunaki.

An Aladdin’s Cave waits for the brave, sincere generation ready to embrace meekness. Did not Flavius Josephus say “The meek shall inherit the Earth”? He was referring to a communion that accentuates the Annunaki.