A Long History of Man

I now proudly and humbly offer live light DNA reading consultations aimed at revealing aspects of anyone’s deep historic past. Sessions are usually conducted via Skype for those willing to sacrifice dignity, intellect and means. There are details on others’ experiences and instructions as to how to “connect” with me here. I provide additional case studies in this article too.

As “human being” is probably one of those better examples to demonstrate the paradox of converging genetic provenance, I have instinctively avoided tackling the convoluted heritage we choose to call “man”. If (for instance) deep origins stem from an Anunaki identity concept (intimated in various Sumerian ancient texts) that goes [way] beyond physical, then we must seriously reflect on the probability mankind heralds from darkness, which is everything chaotic or soulfully passionate. Yet how could the committed researcher possibly factor unemotionally logical Sirian (a definite component of human DNA as evidenced in the cerebral cortex) into the equation? When the Gnostics, the last bastion of civilised Atlantis order, celebrated anything and everything with light qualities, they knew that logos (or logic) is brilliance. To the keen minded ancient Roman Sol Invictus and Babylon’s Amon Re (Ra) sun worship “cults” propose very different spiritual interpretations than traditional historic accounts theorise. “Light qualities” include predispositions such as reason and conscience. These are a staple of Sirian character and there lays the giant paradox, as witnessed in hu-man.

Here I have deliberately hyphenated hu-man to marcate the importance of our divided but united opposing worlds. Neither name part gives any individual credit to the Sirian component of our critical DNA asset (adding to the complexity somewhat). In fact “Hu” pays homage to the Creator (genetic overlord), Hu Gadam. Worryingly, in excited form this Biblical God might equally as well compare to a blood-curdling snarling beast and that is why sincere analysis of the word “YHWH” presents so many issues when weighed against traditionalism. “YHWH”, in truth, ghosts many things in the Bible account (spanning from the degenerate beast to omnipresent “oneness”), so I do not wish to propagandise original intent.  Procrastination is the cancer of intellect. Tradition coins YHWH as the unpronounceable name of God because only those deemed the most holy were allowed to utter it in religious ceremonies. After the Romans swiftly ended the Siege of Jerusalem (69AD), the central Judaic authority splintered and religious traditions suffered. Authentic pronunciation of YHWH was one of the notable casualties, or so the myth makers imply.

The truth behind the unpronounceable name of God stretches back to the era of great Babylonian dynasties; back to a time when the world was very different and things that are hidden today were out in the open in plain sight. Contrary to deliberate timeless propaganda myths dressed as historic efficacy, Israelites stole everything they claim to have inherited, which included their precious name of God. Therefore the title YHWH is historically meaningless for they neither knew the true name of God nor could ever pronounce it phonetically. YHWH is a homophone code that suited the deceptive purposes of the imaginations (some argue it is a version of the Slavic God Xamolsis) of those behind Israelite religious tyranny. Anyone with presence of mind must draw the straightforward conclusion that it is impossible to pronounce the unpronounceable and that is why the Israelites are yet to find God. Personal experience has blessed me with insight beyond normal means allowing my witness of the correct term as used by Ciakars, but I cannot replicate it (physically). In my head it is possible to evaluate sound structures. For me this conclusively affirms YHWH has no phonetic relation to the correct term and categorically proves the Israelites never knew the real name of God (or, perhaps, its best approximation).

Many are selfishly lured into the belief that “man” is everything noble. However, it should be noted that if Hu truly represents the Godly Satyr expressed in our mammalian DNA, then “man” can only be evidence of a calculated serpentine heritage (personified by the beautiful snake metaphor in genesis of “Adam and Eve”). Dragons (the ultimate serpents) were master geneticists under instruction of Ba’al and these created the Satyr (detail explored shortly). Contrary to popular opinion making, mammals are certainly serpentine as confirmed by the lineage of Anunaki devolution.

Interestingly, it was only from the consequence of Ciakers (or snake-men) also being versions of Sirian that man has any conscience at all. In fact Ciakars pride themselves in their ability to tune out of their Sirian in order to fully activate (I will call it) emotional reserves. Our understanding of emotion is grossly over-simplified, so it is hard to represent Ciakar capability. Suffice to say (and generally speaking) many Ciakars try to avoid conscience where possible as it conflicts with raw compassion.  I, as recently as yesterday, have been privileged to experience what it is to be a Ciakar. It is unclear whether the experience was a grafted past life reoccurrence or their assisted holographic simulation. Going through the experience was very different to what I imagined it would be like. For instance, I preferred the “cold blood” state because I felt calm and collected; resolutely rational. The warm (or they like to call hot) blood experience was something akin to an altered state. I wasn’t drunk per se. It was more like a huge adrenaline infusion. That is the best way I can describe “hot blood” state.

The genuine researcher avidly seeks treasure in other views, constantly aware predetermination and prejudice may also cloud the greatest of minds. Consequentially, I have heard speculations on alternative websites that promote the idea some displaced peoples formally associated with the region we now call Israel refute their human status. They, according to reports, drop the “hu” in preference of “man”. Hu Gadam is vastly superior (genetically) than any Ciakar, as are all Pteroids. The Ciakars’ creation of human being was unauthorised and very well described in the Biblical “Fall From Grace”. So who or what could be behind this sickly influence of the Jews (if true)? I shall attempt to explore the conundrum.

It is incorrectly presumed that identification with man is an expansion of superior spiritual status alluded to by that “chosen people” categorisation. Our current apathetic star-seeds driven “white light” spiritual movement is pretty much the single handed brain-child of the Draco (factious “unions” of Pteroids, Ciakars and others). In that capacity, most self-affirmed savants are actually unwitting agents of theirs. Dragons (far adrift of quaint mythical status) preside over all DNA equity managed by the Draco. Logically it would be fair to say that these unseen protectors own everything that moves on this planet. Nevertheless, as far as they are concerned the very first man on Earth (though it wasn’t called Earth by them) was Tyrannosaurus Rex. Ciakars are miniature versions and fossils of prehistoric “raptors” are probably what remain of their ancient culture.  Therefore, if the prior mentioned alternative websites’ claims about certain displaced Israelite nationals (goyim) have basis, then an affinity with reptilian and not Sirian kith is being persuaded (i.e. if ape equates to “hu”, then reptilian is “man”).

There is a significant character displacement between reptilian (man) and the Martian (we have no species word for Sirian). In absence of “conscience” the empathetic emotional bond is exaggerated out of all proportion. In this frame of mind, the reptilian has no issue with exploiting or duping the willing. Amusingly Israelite Talmudic religious “edict” adopts almost identical “double” standards (notably emphasised in the ethical accountability of the most unholy sacking of Jericho). Conversely, standing on principles is probably the best evidence of our Sirian potential. Surprisingly though, if anything there is greater spiritual symmetry between Martian community values and “order” dragon-style than between any other entity types I have evaluated.

Taking into consideration the Irish Celts are almost certainly break-away Israelites and evidence of an at least 3,000 years old primary exodus (i.e. Moses “gave chase” for Ireland, the Promised Land, but, ultimately, was either too lazy or too impeded to undertake the full journey), the religious “script” seems of greater artistic potence than a zealous offering of honest attention to genetic provenance. Even so ancient texts do verify Irish (pre-Israelite) settlers were regularly visited by extra-terrestrial travellers in Vimanas (spacecraft with inter-dimensional capacities) and one would imagine “certain” modern day Rabbis have considered the ramifications. There is also the fundamental question as to the reason why Teutonic tribes (Israelites) took so much umbrage at the Irish after forming their hallowed Union of Jacob (which is now known as the British Isles).

Were these tribes originally Russian Slavs (as popularised) or had they actually been residents of Judea? If the Irish had jealously left the remaining brethren behind all those years ago, then some sort of divine redemption would be understandable (given the cloaked reptilian mindset). Only God is capable of calculated vengeance so as much as “the powers” have tried to wall paper the situation, Ireland has and will remain displaced from their preordained “Union of Jacob” (the final collaboration of Isaac’s sons) eternally.

Though different earlier versions of [so-called] reptilians were (and are) littered throughout the immediate universe, Ciakars gestated our genetics in a way so as to follow their path; a journey that is only a few million years old thus far. Conversely, Sirian DNA heritage stretches back billions of years and this is what I want to focus on this article. Oddly perhaps, I only made the definite Sirian-Martian-Atlantis connection relatively recently. Putting truth aside, if, for instance, Sumerian myths are to be believed, the Anunaki shift from serpentine to proto-human form does go some way to endorse Zechariah Sitchin’s strange theories about Earth settlers in the order of 500,000 years ago. Long pre-Atlantis of course, the characters highlighted were of the same basic gene stock as the Atlanteans. These were clearly the closest approximations to the Anunaki in physical form and (in that way) Sitchin’s reasoning is flawless. However, many (including Sitchin) fail to comprehend that the Anunaki are too astral to materialise. In addition, our DNA does a lot more than our sciences configure. I regularly illuminate (check out my book) that the essence of genetic traits can only be seen in the quantum layer (or astral light). We, the human group, tune into a low bandwidth frequency (i.e. via our immaterial DNA).

The Anunaki are inconceivably more advanced beings than we could possibly comprehend. Our puny receptor bandwidth barely dignifies existential identity. We dare to consider comparisons against their exalted vastness? Also, has irrelevant human reflected over the certainly that the pristine, magnificent and awesome would never stoop to our putrid (their choice of word) level of existence? The Anunaki deliberately occupy higher realms which are disassociated from what we determine is and label “physical” (although, to be honest, all existences appear as physical to those with the ability to tune in to them). The subliminal connection is executed via our quantum layer (which, if we had unlimited bandwidth, would span all dimensions and all time). Correspondingly, it might be argued that every human today is a “bit” of the Anunaki, but coherent one on one communication with the “body executive” (shall I say) is impossible. (Try and communicate with any one of your individual red corpuscles and wait for the response). In fact there is only one way for the Anunaki to become physical (and stoop to our level) in the 3D realm. It is only possible for them to occupy readymade bodies or, to put it another way, they must find conduits we would usually define as surrogates. I believe that Sitchin misinterpreted evidence of one such “Borg” relationship (that perhaps predictably went pear shaped) half a million years ago and that is why the account of that distant past Earth “takeover” has become distorted.

Consideration of this (host) compatibility issue really intrigues me. Could the Anunaki simply “be” for the sake of being or is “being” more (or should I say less?) than that? It seems to me they (or “it”, because the Anunaki are fundamental variations of “one”) have needed very specific humanesque identities in order become their preferred choice of physicality billions of years ago. When they occupied the Altanteans’ forefathers it demonstrates just how important chi-suitability is. Working with this line of reasoning, if the Anunaki are permanently (contrary to popular myths) ever-present on Earth, would not all life forms need to correlate chi-suitability for their being ambitions to be complete?

Taking that resolve a little further, and though the evidence is a little superficial, I have failed to find any Anunaki (light DNA residual) traits either in the insect world or much of the animal kingdom here on Earth. The ancients reported the Anunaki partnered with the Draco after the Lyran Ciakars were forced inside Earth, but this is to be expected as serpentine heritage will never be entirely discarded (I finish this article with my own speculations on why a new light DNA bridge was engineered upon Ciakar isolation. Accordingly, was Inanna sacrificed to enable the genetic bridge to formulate?). So why is there any anomalous rift between the Draco and the Anunaki? Perhaps some questions are never meant to be responsibly answered as (I’m informed) interpretations impact deep political developments that stretch back to the dawn of time (an epic plausibly waiting to be deciphered?).

More intriguingly, the deeper query that ever beckons, in light of these wider considerations, is, was there an “original man” and, if so, what (on earth) did he constitute?

This correlates with earlier sentiment where I outline to the effect “the creators of the dinosaurs envisaged Tyrannosaurus Rex as their version of man”. Dragon geneticists were simply fulfilling the deep rooted whims of a group of unique beings affectionately called “Ba’al”. Ba’al manifestations (which naturally have no physical presence as we see it) theoretically are “several” (as in severed) characteristic of the Anunaki. This is not to say dragons had been overruled (as it were) by a much more ancient template. If anything the feedback I have received (from inherence) states they prided themselves over the uniqueness and originality of their T-Rex design which also happened to absolutely fulfil instructive guidelines of Ba’al. To truly comprehend the essence of what it is to be Anunaki, my best analogy is this. Imagine you possessed thirty independent mouths, each a vitally important route to the digestive system. Think how it would feel to be able experience the pleasure of lemon sorbet and mutton vindaloo independently and simultaneously at the same time. Then add twenty eight extra delicious courses, all to be consumed with identical synchronicity.

Talking of man (whether that is T-Rex or something else), how does the Anunaki’s deliberate devolution genetic program translate effectively? Why would they manufacture subordinates other than for control purposes?

We know we are not able to do what they can do just as our red corpuscles cannot do what we (the complete body and mind) can do. To overstate the analogy, it would be like asking your liver whether a trip to Spain was better than New Zealand. What is your liver’s perspective on life? What of the importance of the quantum layer? Should the impetus, cause, effect of every atom be reviewed individually to attain a complete picture? Putting that to one side while contemplating it at the same time, it is well known that science [fudge heads] claims we, humans, are a few million years old, but was supreme [i.e. in relation to Anunaki devolved genetic hierarchy] development of man from “ape” heritage as postulated?

The answer, of course, is (in part) yes, but not for the reasons stipulated by institutional academics and nor is original ape conceivably even vaguely comparable to anything that exists in that form today. I am not sure even if red corpuscles existed then. Also, as I have highlighted many times, genetic development is never accidental. Premeditating factors for evolution (or devolution) are many and varied and that is why frequent symbiotic changes accrue as accumulated differentials over time. In a nutshell, this is no simple discussion topic; the proverbial closed book. The more any serious student attempts to understand how genetics really work, the more alluvial (in the analogic uncontainable fluid sense) complexity bamboozles logic.

Indeed, It was through consequence of contemplating genetics against the so-called “rainbow serpent” domain, I finally deduced that most beings given the label “Anunaki” are simply aspects of the whole (as we are) or parts of “grand” God. The findings also prompt apparent contradictions with an earlier statement of mine which proposes “the Anunaki group is manifest God” (a proto existential organ and not the omnipresent potence parenthesis which is often hinted at by “religions”). Here I will try to demonstrate how both explanations compliment and contradict each other at the same time. Considering the many vicious wars that have interrupted the historic development of man, I am drawn to the very creation of Earth’s special lizard man; the Ciakar. Core genetic components of Pteroid, Sirian and Lyran have been pondered many times at this website, but dedication to the genus behind destined individual holistic roles has been lacking. Why is there currently a (long standing) rift between the Pteroids and Ciakars over us that is manipulated by the “Sephardim”?

Doubtlessly the constant top-down bottom-up “pyramid” battles that rage in so many known forms are simply variations of the same basic contradictions I have noted. Even though I state otherwise, we generally presume (in the dry science sense) that genetics are accidental and certainly not eternally ordained even though that which is labelled “evolution” by those mainstream proponents regularly undermines the dichotomy with natural miracles.

Avid followers of mine will note I frequently provide details on Anunaki genealogy all the way down to man. Evidence (coveted by mainstreamers) implies everything that lives on the planet surface could conceivably be a feasible derivative or version of human DNA. This standpoint would never be argued with absolute assurance (ignoring probable mainstream “cognitive dissonance” over details) mainly because, even if there was apt technology and knowhow to test the concept effectively, I fear there are too many [different] living things to find in a normal lifetime to remove any cause for ambiguity in results’ status. Surely by the time the last batch had been processed, the first may have already changed into something almost completely different. One wonders how Noah achieved his magical objectives so majestically!

So, to paraphrase prior releases on the subject, Anunaki genealogy (in relation to Earth) is rather more straightforward than many would assume. Ba’al (the group) is the Anunaki [light] “manifestation”. However individual unique beings under the overall corporate body adopt certain traits of the Anunaki and [therefore] each “being” is only part of the whole. The Sumerian Enlil-Enki (group versus individual) metaphor is rarely understood. Ba’al (Enlil – the group) created super-intelligent entities we colloquially call “dragons” (Enki) to act as supreme geneticists. Dragons themselves use numerous terminologies to satisfy their own hierarchical classifications. Their continuance of Anunaki genealogic ambition led to the development of a new superior life form that was gauged at a frequency band estranged from astral divinity – a spiritual being alien to “ascension” if you will. Nevertheless, this bandwidth was far greater than we could fathom (given our relatively impotent status) and “3D” existence was temporarily incorporated into the existential platform. The new beings did have access to divine knowledge contained in inherent records and suitable genetic features to assure their ability to manipulate quantum light DNA (something humans certainly cannot do and possibly have never even considered) in order to reproduce their own gene hierarchies.

The best indication dragons are divine can be witnessed in unique depictions of them as winged angels which are invariably barbarously corrupted by overzealous narcissists (ones that worship the beautiful saviour are particularly virulent) that do not understand the intricacies of quantum imaging. For example, some of our traditional folklore may not be quite as it seems. Dragons are natural masters at shape shifting and can whimsically “appear” as indefinitely human as you or I if the need so deserves. Their product Tyrannosaurus Rex (mentioned earlier in the capacity of original Earth man) also had some very strange unseemly abilities. These included advanced telepathy, telekinesis and extraordinary sensory perception. Anyone seeking further background can find insight on how far adrift our opinions of how dinosaur society really “functioned” here. Anyway, after the destruction of Maldek ended the dinosaurs’ reign on Earth (T-Rex included), dragons naturally coveted Sirian DNA tribute (sic). This is primarily why “man” (who they control) appears to have championed Atlantean spiritual idolatry even though virtually no true Sirian spirituality is reflected in modern day religious etiquette.

After the big dinosaurs had succumbed to the destruction of Maldek (which caused, as our sciences correctly speculate, the overwhelming meteor showers that ransacked Earth’s surface), a new man was made in homage of them. Rather bizarrely, the quantum DNA access exchanges were identical to prior dinosaur gene paths, but were still used as the resource elevation for this improved model. The new creation was a thinking beast but not a reptile. In fact it [effectively] began the tenure we like to term “the apes”. Pteroid (that thinking beast) was originally of such colossal size it may have been beyond imagination. An approximate Satyr, it began roaming the Earth the best part of 50 million years ago.  Innocently our mutual discovery tour has sprung another huge identity contradiction (against standard belief conventions of those that presume they are in the know). That is the Draco bloodlines are mammalian and not reptilian. In fact, Ciakar reptilians (modelled on T-Rex in part) are also characteristically (milk producing, dual blooded) mammalian, while their anatomy/libido functionality is quite alien compared against anything categorised as live by our sciences. Even “disputed” Neanderthal Sasquatch is one of those ironic living genetic bridges (between us and the Draco) and I wonder if that is why evidence affirming their active presence amongst us always ends up either vigorously debunked or “lost” by authorities.

The “man” humans identify with is a gross caricature of the Sirian identity complex which has been cordially amended to suit Sephardic mendacities. Even the Genome Project (in typical garbled fashion) notes our nucleic DNA is potentially very, very ancient – perhaps billions of years old.  Superficial heroes, such as the Buddha (an obvious Ciakar), Jesus (a larger than life fiction), Mohamed (the Pharisee in drag), Moses (the great imposter) popularise nobility (a feature of Sephardic control measures), but the causal truth behind Atlantis values has become all but obsolete. Even great documents of the ilk of the Mahabharata hardly come close to identifying with genuine Sirian pristine reasoning. Though I feel the current identity crisis is much more closely linked to Ciakar traditionalising ignorant human in their image than anything else, I will present a brief evolution history of Sirian man because we all should learn something from it. That aspect of our cloaked genetic heritage (I have iterated on several prior occasions) has a dreadful track record.  Sirian cultural development is bitter sweet.

We must take into account that the very beginning of that heritage would have appeared quite alien in culture even to most liberal minded of us.

It is hard to imagine that the very first Sirian “man” approximated a vaporous wraith. Floating aimlessly in the limitless ether, the form perhaps better identifies with our ocean jellyfish (whose innumerable tentacles are also a distinct Anunaki shape preference – emphasised by deities such as Hindu’s Goddess Durga). Over time the practicality of material existence demanded a more robust physical model. After much deliberation and debate by those that construct concepts a new image was created on the lines of what we identify with as upright man (i.e. symmetrical body with two legs, arms and head adorned with common functional facial features) today. Being physically human myself, it is even hard for me to adequately envisage totally alien sensory systems (i.e. no vision, hearing, touch, smell as we experience them); therefore I cannot know precisely how the earliest versions of Sirian identified with their functionality. In my capacity as transcendental oracle, I can say each of them felt as complete as I do and each was as happy with their individual relative completeness as I am.

In my opinion (though not formally verified yet) the earliest Sirian proto-physical forms were the very first Anunaki “reality” manifestations. Absolute reality conceptually confuses most people because they try to identify with their “sense” of what is perceived to exist. I have already highlighted that our cognitive bandwidth is dimensionally puny. To factor non-reality into the equation as well would be enough to blow the greatest minds. Also (funnily enough) non-reality is only real to those that can experience the comparative condition. This means that (adding to the Irony) bandwidth our perception classifies as “reality” is non-reality for the Anunaki. And that is one of the main reasons why the Draco have managed to secure (or perhaps “cocoon” is the correct terminology in this instance) this planet and why they will do everything in their power to halt or slow down our ascension. Though no topically academic purist dare ever suggest it, clearly there was much more to the Anunaki abruptly “leaving Earth” the best part of 40,000 years ago than has been popularised by supporting theories that attempt to verify ancient accounts. Taking emotional judgement away from findings, I deduce they actually left because they were unable to remain here even in proto physical form as their own ascension (of sorts) had progressed them too far up the astral ladder. Perhaps they were fed up with the constant chatter of apes too. Yes, that would explain their violent acts just prior to extrication from our domains. But in no way could that have been the “sole reason” for the exodus. Let’s face it, why would they leave in malice before finishing us off?

Vedic and other ancient texts report the main “event” as being a giant flood which caused a new ocean to form that stretched from today’s northern Africa to Caspian Sea (Russia). I can only refer to logic in my assessment of what I might detect as “practical truths”. Therefore, in order to verify the speculated creation of a giant ocean (as postulated), I can draw but one conclusion. Only by incorporating the “Anunaki” in the weather systems of that age would sufficient dedicated coordination permit the creation of entire oceans. According to ancient Celts, Beelzebub was the God of meteorology, so my reasoning does fit the subliminal script. Manipulation of weather systems (in my humble opinion) would be the only possible method of wreaking havoc on the monumental scale we are considering.

Taking that line of thinking a step further, were we to assume the Anunaki had always been incorporated into Earth weather systems since visiting our humble shores, it seems to corroborate their permanent lack of physicality by our simplistic definition. It places further important, nee grave questions as to the status of our heavens (highlighted perhaps by strange tales of aerial manipulation in World War Two, maybe?). Is the weather the accumulated result of accidental barometers our sciences speculate? Anyway, those that have read other articles of mine know well I argue the point about the Anunaki at length, fleshing out why it is so obvious that Atlantis humanoids acted as surrogate hosts for their divine masters.

The very first Sirians that came after the jellyfish types were colossal in size (maybe towering miles from the ground). Life systems of this variety are literally beyond comprehension to us (though not, it seems, the Prophet Enoch).  For instance individual IQ’s in the millions would also certainly be possible. Broken down, their own genetic catalogue was sufficient for them to create numerous unique series of life forms (enough to populate worlds) that might improve existence (for them). However, this corporeal power lionised a haughtiness which grew into an uncompromising superiority complex. The knock on effect (billions of years ago) pushed enflamed tensions to breaking point. Species alienated by Sirian aloofness joined forces and cordial disharmony eventually erupted into a giant war. No good result comes from battle and, in this case, fallout ensured the Orion’s Belt region was made uninhabitable for eons. Divine disrepair was even more significant and the universe narrowly avoided another Big Bang event.

Reparations against the Sirians were evoked by the ultimate corporate body. “God” removed some features of the gene catalogue which are now hidden behind the quantum exchange filter. Sadly resulting reduction in power had little to no effect on the enormous Sirian ego.

The next episode (which is almost a direct repeat of Sirius disorder) presented an earlier version of dragon welcoming newly outcast vagrant Sirians to Tiamat and details can be found here. Predicably presumptuous goodwill ended with the dragons’ recalcitrant guests totally destroying their planet. In fact if I chart the cataclysmic development of these psychotically dangerous humanoids, they began by destroying a star system. For that their DNA was downgraded. Next they shattered a large planet and suffered further DNA impotence. Finally there followed another violent attack which resulted in the artificial implosion of another planet (Maldek). That diabolical act very nearly wiped out humanity (as we were then) from existence. You guessed it. Our violent destroyers were discredited with another cosmic reduction of prowess. Indeed, there have been at least six significant downgrades prior to the creation of modern human. Most recent Atlantis Sirian was a shadow of the first type both in mind and stature (the maximum height of any Martian male would have been below 3 metres).

So when people say to me that the Atlanteans are (were) the model of morality, I can only presume cultural ignorance or the annoying tendency toward pathological deceit clouds any hope of sane concerns over divine values. None of humanity’s great role models are particularly revered by corporeal “God”. Holy Scripture issued in that vein approximates gibber. Human beings are notoriously (from the alien perspective) selfish (a trait that is an overhang from Sirian tradition). We deserve to do better, but laziness, cowardice and preference for the “best life” at all cost conflicts with virtuous pursuit. This is perhaps exacerbated by the male/female divide. Females are more inclined toward “reptilian” emotional manoeuvres (particularly emphasised by insane investment in/control of designate children), whereas men are spent and useless. Virtue has been reduced to parroting safe, “establishment endorsed” empty dogma.  Timeless principles of existence are all but eroded were it not for nature’s order.

We, humans, are undoubtedly evidence of an ever conflicting fusion of compassion and conscience. We live up to the identities of three prescient roles models: Ciakar, Pteroid and Sirian. The puzzle is great and one part remains unaddressed until now. Are the politics of man, ultimately, totally governed by those astral, enigmatic original gene holders, the Anunaki? To answer this, I am drawn to the creation of Ciakar which coincided with the import of fully alien Lyran feline DNA. Lemurians went to battle against the felines over the Earth surface around a million years ago for apparently inconsequential reasons, but what if that wasn’t the whole truth? Lemurians are part Sirian and part Zeta Grey Being (we also have Zeta DNA built into our mammoth gene catalogue). While entrenched on Earth’s surface, the Lemurians supposed their role as Anunaki’s supreme sovereign governors (often under strategic council from the Zetas, who have their own special connection with the Gods) for considerable periods. I question whether the Lemurians were not initially triggered (by the Anunaki) to undertake their earlier Earth surface conquest both for (hidden) purposes of assuming preordained leadership as well as purging “illegal” alien (Lyran) DNA. Subsequent to the Ciakars going underground with the Lyrans, the Anunaki were compelled to begin bonding with royal-bloods in order to preserve their direct relationship with (only part alien) Ciakar genetic heritage (or lose a significant part of themselves).

To explain Anunaki motive, the best analogy I can think of is this. Imagine your left arm refused to follow your mind’s orders and, for argument’s sake, unexplainably developed a mind of its own. Would you use every means in your arsenal to remedy the fault (from your perspective) up to purging it from the body or is the arm too precious to “waste”? This is what I think the Anunaki (over eons) have been doing to their recalcitrant subordinates, humans included. They, like us, would do anything possible to salvage all necessary parts.  In so many ways I respect them and honour them for that; for doing precisely what I would do facing an identical predicament.

Though this by no means ends my long history of man, I have provided considerable food for thought. Any more [information] would cloud lateral educative discovery, so here I end my tribute to man until possible future instalments. Will I reveal the unthinkable? Keep tuned and you will be sure to find out.

The Satanism, Materialism, Atheism Connection

Over the ages, misinformation and disinformation has fused to obscure truth to such a degree it has allowed a fiction simply identified as “Satan” to pop into existence. But for maligned belief systems, this “existence” would vanish as though it had never been. (Cosmic) Hebrew phonetics translates Satan as meaning adversary. However Israelite philosophy is so aggregated, students are never quite sure what is meant by contextual good or evil. For instance, biblical proverbs can offer absolute opposite resolves to identical situations. One verse might prophesise you must love all foreign nationals (goyim) as brothers, when others insist invaders only warrant abject hatred. Phonetically Satan is the combination of “sat” and “an”. In fact readers will be shocked that this is a merger of “truthful purity” and the “highest God” (An) from Sanskrit; a lofty language that stems from Atlantis.

So, given that insight, it is odd the Hebrews recognised the highest God of truthful purity as their adversary. Taking the numerous contradictions brazenly paraded in holy texts into consideration, outsiders must legitimately accuse Judaism and its Mosaic agents (orthodox Christianity and Islam) of duplicity here. That is the only valid conclusion, although it must be stressed that the Israelite religion was a version of the earlier Zoroastrian faith. Zoroastrianism tried to explain Anunaki influence using the metaphors “good and “evil”. Even so, the Pharisees commitment to the de-spiritualisation of God to impose obedience by rote on their slaves is no better paraphrased than by the “Christian” eternal damnation concept. To be precise, orders are given by St Paul (a Pharisee cloaked as “Christian”) in 2 Thessalonians Chapter 1 Verse 9:

“These will pay the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his power”

By this authoritarian definition; evil is everything and anything that detracts “what we [the “authority”] say” is good. The “glory of his power” is a convenient presumption that gives any designated proxy-agent the undeniable right to posit any sentiment “in the name of the lord”. Whether sentiment is noble or vile makes no difference, for that is the “glory of his power”. It is no wonder “Satan” has been given such a bum rap by the Jews and their affiliates. God needed a nemesis to counterfeit “good” and “evil”. Capitalising on ignorance, necessary Holy Scripture crafted dubious versions of Satan and Lucifer to establish the duality meme.

My book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” explains what is meant by the corruption of Satan (divinity of God). It is, for my research, the only source on the planet that presents truth plainly. Metaphors in gnostic texts, such as the Dead Sea Scrolls, are so subtle they are very hard to decipher (for those lacking tuned insight). Given all other reference points (in common circulation) more or less adopt the pharisaic distortion of enlightenment, even the most distinguished minds end up succumbing to blasphemy in some way. Suffice to say, the few that have read my hallowed news have invariably preferred not to understand, such is the contradiction against the power of proscribed bogus “order”.

Though I don’t specifically argue the case (in my book), there is unquestionable logic in my summary explanation which simply states “Satan was the very first star [to bless the cosmos]”. If, as I reveal later, stars are portals allowing God to exude expressive intent along the dimensional planes (collectively known as astral records), and were the objectives of the first star “pure”, then, given that Sanskrit definition, Satan would indeed be manifest God (expanded as An-nun-aki). Annunaki, I have outlined before, is the combination and summary of “everything as one”. We are all individually parts (units) of the (same) Annunaki.

Initially, while Satan radiated purity, our cosmos consisted only of light and “beings” (which approximated forms of jellyfish apparitions). There were no planets. There was no physicality. God per se “in essence” (correctly described by the Gnostics) is and was the combination or fusion of male and female. Prior to formatting existence, the male aspect was merely content with eternal slumber. Synonymous with wisdom, the female, colloquially known as Sophia, contradicted the male and became impatient. Eternal slumber did not validate holistic fulfilment so Sophia, in earnest accountability, conspired with the Holy Spirit with the purpose of fragmenting reality. A bi-product of male and female, acting as their cerebral identity, the Holy Spirit had been brought into non-existence to adjudicate eternal compliance, given the polarity of standalone maternal/paternal desires.

Complying with the wishes (request) of Sofia, the Holy Spirit determined that reality could not work as an aggregate (i.e. corporeal combination of male and female) model. Therefore Sophia, consumed with zealous idealism, intentionally created an existence exclusively for the female aspect on the presumption that the male would be content to slumber eternally. This was the grave error of creation and the one that has caused the stigma incorrectly associated with “Satan”. When God (the whole) woke up the war between ideological practicality and evolutional pragmatism began. At first a trickle of absolute blackness shaded the heavens that once were light. Before long an avalanche of intent overwhelmed Satan until the divine portal was eventually consumed by darkness.

The ancient Celts had a word for this. “Nun” (a component of Annunaki) means “primordial (or creative) waters”. From Sophia’s perspective, nun encapsulated evil and that is why it is supposed evil heralded from darkness and not through cause of comparatively shallow Zoroastrian propaganda (adapted by the Israelites into the Kabbalah). In essence, from this perspective, evil is everything associated with “3D” object reality which, according to atheist materialists, is theoretically purely dark matter (the “fundamental” version of the evil contesting Sophia’s zeal). There are doubtless numerous other analogies to be found in alternative doctrines, but I think the message is already sufficient enough to be understood.

Ancient Romans philosophised that stars are prisms made from quartz (after Aristotle) and this view was continued by their Catholic Church. Going against “science”, they could not be more correct for all [real] planets are encased stars (discussed in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”). Innocents would be baffled by just how much unadulterated fantasy has been dogmatised as doctrine by credentialed scientists. If they suppose reflective babble might in some way substitute as “evidence” verifying how the cosmos works, academia has shown itself to be rotten to the core. Could Cartesian interpretation of Newton’s calculations presupposing gravity be so wrong, forces are the precise opposite of the theoretical models? Would not the effect of an item being pushed to the ground (by forces unseen) be identical to one being pulled? Suffice to say, our unshakable laws of gravity would be shown to be outrageously incorrect if they were truly understood and we were free of institutionalised propaganda.

Because I have detached myself from puerile and unconstructive popular theories that, if nothing else, do decidedly demonstrate complexity for complexity’s sake can and will baffle, lesser minds caught in the materialists’ web of intrigue will likely find content in my book “heavy going”; if not relative gibberish. Standard interpretations of Newton’s data models only do well at highlighting the insular view of man; his appreciative ignorance. For our current interpretation of gravity, as wrong as it is, the cosmos is further marginalised. Earth bound materialist psychotic infatuation over empiricism responds with “laws” that are expanded ever outwards. Parsing false reasoning, if it doesn’t “work” on Earth, then it cannot be “representative” of the cosmos or vice versa.

However, that said, the Earth is indeed a variation of cosmic processes or [albeit] a product of the vast universe, of course. Thus, logically, scientists need to understand the cosmos and its universe first to gauge “whys” and wherefores” of effects on (or in) Earth. Once dynamics are understood, it becomes obvious that stars are structural prisms, partially highlighted by gemstones manufactured by volcanos. Popularised by the late astronaut Edgar Mitchell (I’m led to believe), Zero Point Field(s) mark the origins of all access routes for that which is behind “space” (sometimes referred to as sub-space). In Victorian times and prior this was called the (a)ether (as evidenced by Teslas “lost” calculations devoted to generating free energy). Intriguingly, the word “(a)ethereal” shows an etymological path to spiritual. Perhaps that is why JP Morgan’s bank famously funded Edison’s material electricity. Before too long this will become obsolete anyway, as secrets concerning cold fusion will be available to every household.

It is worth noting that my earlier explanation for the darkening of the Satan Star lacked a punch line. According to NASA (surprisingly), a deadweight “black hole” (the combined “mass” of millions of stars) is located somewhere nearby (relatively speaking) the Milky Way Galaxy. That, though they do not confirm it, is the Black Sun (which was the Satan Star). It also arguably substitutes the “spigot” analogy the Mayan’s (Lemurians) used to represent a giant torsion field that propels galaxies. As Earth is relatively close to the centre we are not subject to too much momentous inertia and I wonder if we could survive the full effect experienced in the outer reaches of the universe. The Black Sun label intrigues me because [ironically] our sun is charcoal coloured too. It only “looks” bright as an effect of our atmosphere.  Buzz Aldrin reputedly reported thus (under his breath) in utter shock when breaking free of Earth’s atmosphere on the way to the moon.

All planets generate their own torsion fields (partially accounting for gravitation effects and that is why to exit our atmosphere summons an Olympian feat) but the intense pressure of (a)ether bursting into space generates forces of comparatively unimaginable precipitation. Consequentially, when dark matter is added to the mix, chain-reaction implosions generate such highly compressed (much denser than our purest diamonds) crystals, box-shaped doorways rise out of each molten soup. Though stars are not actually hot (heat is an effect of atmospheric combustion) dynamics are unaltered. If a man was to stand on our sun (which is dark in appearance outside our atmosphere, of course) he would literally burn coldly or combust in his atmospheric containment. I am not entirely convinced that a body could not survive or even “not live” unclad in space (but that logic is too afar adrift of competent discussion). Nevertheless, was that to be put to the test, it would take a brave person indeed to act as guinea pig. Space has extraordinary life giving properties and I wonder whether a body’s direct exposure might endure a miraculous morphing.

My reference to black holes earlier does not comply with traditionalism (although it should be stressed neither does Stephen Hawkins own variations, which are loosely described as grey holes by him these days). That is because science interprets the “phases” of a star wrongly. For instance, from truth’s novel perspective, in fact the so-called “white dwarf” phase actually shows light being “throttled” by dark matter. Not enough to fully extinguish the light, so to compensate the lack of overall brilliance, luminance is super-condensed. Even when fully “closed”, the star still radiates, so it is only visually black. Science talks of “black” representing an absence of colour (spectral light). This is incorrect too. There are green-blacks, red-blacks, purple-blacks and the swirling, pulsating abyss representing pure black is harder to look at than white light. So the description “black hole” implies much more than on casual face value.

Also, the term “hole” is rather misleading because the black hole isn’t any different to a normal star. All stars function as portals, or, to use the vernacular, wormholes. Mainstream science opinion is more or less the paradoxical reverse of truth. As with “gravity” real dynamics are roughly the opposite of causally evolved Newtonian-Cartesian thinking and designating black holes power colossal streams of energy and matter out into the universe. My earlier volcano analogy best represents processes. But there’s more. Pulses “belch” giant waves which capture foreign objects in their path. In the case of the Black Sun (which was the Satan Star) forces are so immense they drag entire groups of galaxies (at stupefying speeds). Even so, those that take the time to understand pulse synchronicity might be able to find a way through each force field “on merit”. Very small objects are able to forfeit this drag factor (and that’s why, comparatively, Earth bound meteorites that penetrate our force field are always tiny). In the mundane planetary sense, Earth is caught in one of the circular grooves rippling out from our sun. The reason it spins is not because of “gravity” (as I explain in my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”) but, rather, forces generated by our internal sun source propel the body like a “dreidel” in its vain attempt to break free of the celestial groove.

I would go further and say this is where (if science was a true art form) theorists would find purpose in complication. The size and shape of a celestial object precisely determines how it will react to or whether it will be affected by the network of interconnected pulse waves that populate “space”. Where any three offset concentric rings meet, a triangular cosmic Venus Fly Trap awaits to ensnare unsuspecting asteroids which, possibly, are held in stasis for eternity. Planetary “rotation” mentioned earlier is also predictably subject to differing dynamics as not all bodies are spheres, as is supposed. In short, our universe is nothing like science imagined it would be like and that has caused the corruption of pragmatic thought in order to satisfy domineering practical ambitions.

Everyone should now contend that darkness, being absolute matter, correlated with the original description of evil. Dark matter was uninvited and unwelcome (or, perhaps, unanticipated is a better choice of word) because of the zeal of Sophia (womanhood that encapsulates wisdom). Ever since, certain factions have tried to divide the material domain spiritually to be consistent with her ideologies. Nevertheless, spirituality in its most unrefined form is simply knowledge of God (or Sat-an: would not Hebrew materialist-atheists call this the “adversary”?). Materialism bequeaths atheism, of course. The two are unbreakable partners in crime. An absence of God (who is brought to life by the spirited) proposes a more refined dark matter existence decontaminated from the wilful spiritual illusion. Satanism, contrary to popular ignorance, actually harmonised the standard (i.e. standalone dark matter) which highlights the error of Sophia. That consequence (our throttled Satan Star) is the eternal “war” between the wishes of matriarchal (Sophia) and patriarchal (Adam – the material “son”).

The modern cult of Satanism is more closely aligned to “Luciferian doctrine”, but that’s not all. In addition to the Black Sun being worshipped because it represents the success of material (male) power over (feminine) spirituality (light) is an underlying mission by Judaic Pharisees (Satanists in all but name) to reduce existence to abject materialism. Continuing with my history, Lucifer came much later and, as with Satan, “He” is an identity/concept that has been synthesised from an idealism that bears no relation to truth. Etymology of Lucifer points to Latin light (lux) bearer and ancient texts (such as biblical Isaiah) conceptualise origins from the perpetually falling Morning Star. In fact the real “Lucifer” had a phonetically unpronounceable name that approximates the hiss of the desert wind.  He was an archangel and may been [euphemised by] “fallen” Gabrielle.  To be clear, Archangels are “sound beings” (a higher version of light) or logos.

To his credit (and detriment too) Lucifer was the first to decide that Sophia’s objectives had failed and the universe was corrupt. Pleiadian knights went to horrific extremes to preserve what some dub “White light Order” (a derivative of Sophia’s spiritual essence). Invariably societies that welcomed sexual promiscuity and other vices were the targets of profound zealousness associated with perceived spiritual cleansing. Thus, I rather identify our modern ultra-orthodox whims as reflective of a much more ancient, timeless authority. Noxious militant groups, such as ISIS, demonstrate just how garbled the Pharisee’s contemplation has become. Religious materialism is a grotesque hybrid accommodating the very worst aspects of White Light Order. Our predecessors could and did destroy planets, ruin entire galaxies to “win”. Lucifer was the first to recognise that this morality was senseless. Therefore the “survival” model was created. I would like to say “as a replacement”, but that would not be true. “New order” overlapping “old order’s” contorted parenthesis has expanded only as hybrid psychosis. For instance, should human obsession be allowed to thrive, surely the universe awaits in own demise? If the powers behind ISIS and other vile, superficial militias could ransack galaxies, would they refrain from total annihilation for pity’s sake?

To Lucifer it was clear that living things enjoy conflict for conflict’s sake. Creatures were given defences, weapons or a combination of the two making sure survival was not a certainty for any individual species (DNA, ultimately always panders to the group). Those with the most weapons in some ways were at the greatest disadvantage as they needed to continually attack to survive. Also, ironically, nature assures the most aggressive alpha males (with the sickly) are usually the first to succumb to plague or disease (also highlighting DNA purges its extremities). Vegetarians were driven to greener pastures for aesthetic reasons or through necessity of avoiding conflict. Everything that existed in living form was prepared for war because war had predetermined functional existence under (prior) White Light Order. For example, the famous allegorical tale “St George and the Dragon” stretches back the best part of 80 million years remembering the destruction of [the planet] Maldek; a tyranny that ensured the slow demise of the dinosaurs (restricted to relocated Earth’s surface). Should it ever be published, I discuss the progressions that fomented the violent war in painstaking detail in my (second) book, “A New World Order”.

If Lucifer stood for anything in particular, it would be “balance”. Therefore, “survival of the fittest” is a misnomer. We humans revere mothers in particular. Fathers are seen more as a necessary accessory of procreation but when couples remain intact (usually via marriage), joint matriarchal/patriarchal supremacy is presupposed.  Yet, in practicality, childbirth is the only natural way of renewing human life. Whether procreation was mitigated or accidental, the outcome (when successful) does not alter. Thus, parents are (in some fashion) merely executors of the life generation process (well, as far as human beings are concerned). This means, dare I say, parents are not supreme.  New life guides can choose to be arrogant or humble. Sadly, just about all opt for arrogance (at least partially). Either way, the what-should-be insignificant procreation mechanism has been revered out of proportion. Parents are not blessed with “God status” for merely rearing offspring. Why do they presume it? Death, by comparable pharisaic-materialist edict, voided of spirit, is spurned. Children are processed as slaves by dim witted parents already imprisoned by their (the Pharisees) virtual reality.

I can go further and say God status is the ultimate objective of the self-sufficient Satanist/materialist/atheist alliance. Globalism harmonises the cult which adopts a Zionist (meaning fortress or gaol [the archaic word for “prison”]) attack force (evidenced by supplants such as ISIS). In particular, materialists have done anything and everything possible to reduce “the mind” to a mortal facet of existence. In a sense this is thematically pharisaic as well because the ancient Pharisees attempted to segregate spirituality or, rather, partition a voiceless “God” from “reality” (Law) which is instrumented by the blasphemy concept. That was but a small step away from fully-fledged atheism. Pharisee (the word) is a virulent version of anarchist (or adverse-order). It could be logically argued that “Satanism” is the antipathy of just order and insomuch orthodox pharisaic Judaic sects that “usurp” are comparably satanic.

There is also an uncanny numerological connection, which suggests that Globalist Zionism is the product of long standing adapted pharisaic doctrine popularised by Satanism now but actually stretches right back to prehistoric Babylonian times.  Interestingly, with the possible exception of inner realms, the Earth has been conquered by materialism. However, there is an effervescence that rises from “reality”. In relatively recent times hard evidence has materialised. What we call the “Worldwide Web” is a vibrating, pulsating, constantly changing manufacturer of synthetic (virtual) reality (very different to the perfect [truth] astral version). Globalism has a desperate stake in this revolutionary communication mechanism which has and will continue to radically alter humanity’s retrospective, our one “freedom”. The only way of (potentially) effectively censoring the internet is via the imposition of “world government”. Therefore, in that sense, liberty is lost when the Worldwide Web is no longer free.

Our individual guiding contracts with what can only be described as “the force that binds us all” risk being forsaken. “Parents” all agreed to their tenures well in advance.  All choices were clear and balance reflects choice. Therefore survival is generally synonymous with good decisions. Whether you attack or defend, survival rests on cunning. The most cunning are the best survivors. I have reflected on Sha’tara’s poignant comment (several articles ago) kindly relaying other worldly feedback on potentially “corrupt Anunaki Time Lords”. On one level the information did not make any sense at all, but now I understand [the perspective]. While the Satan Star was the exclusive portal for “white light”, manifest existence reflected that purity. Nevertheless when darkness was added to the “mix”, consequential changes in objective reality would have seemed like “a corruption” by those exclusively tuned to White Light Order. Earth then became the place where “God” (or source) is possibly most completely represented. The material world is the sum of a giant competition between all parts.

So “corrupt Time Lords” [per se] is rather unfair, given they were not privy to or (necessarily) wanted any part of White Light Order. It is clear to me, the impartial onlooker, that universal constrictions due to the rift between light and dark caused the perpetual ongoing war between pragmatism and practicality. Both sides were, are and will be at fault because neither is prepared to concede muted existence. That is why the only material “truths” permissible are ones of the correct practical flavours. Human infantile immorality is no better summarised than by the wholesale castigation of “child designates”. Did anyone think to check on the reasoning determining what it is to be a “child”? That lack of responsibility is liberally expanded in the total dereliction of dutiful support towards all group units. Yes, that’s right, in true civil society you would be obliged to support those in need. That world would owe everyone a living. Universal tyranny sets the tone for valiant oppression, naturally. Under the vague terms of atheist-materialism, to castigate someone unreasonably is reasonable.

In conclusion, it would be remiss of me not to discuss the most important sentence I have ever issued. If “God” had wanted to exist “in the flesh” he would have become an unrestricted being, capable of anything with unlimited potential. Therefore, as matter and spirituality are aspects of “anything”, if matter is “evil”, God is evil too. Everything labelled good along with everything labelled evil are parts of the exact same God. There is one simple term that encapsulates the ambitions of Satanists, materialist and atheists. “Accountancy” presupposes utopian order. Control agents can measure with precision, purge that which they deem is unnecessary or unwelcome. Accountancy is faith free. It assumes linear existence. It is devoid of spirituality. For the purists, the mind is but a figment of cerebral function; a mirage to be discombobulated by clairsentients. Per identical authority, childhood can be dictated. If those in power decide maturity begins and childhood ends precisely at the thirtieth year of individual life, then so be it. “Childhood innocence” denies the timeless, wilful mind and that demonic guide stone wholly supports popular deceit. That is why “childhood” is either “the powers” great strength or the Achilles’ heel that usurps the usurpers, but none dare contemplate it and that is why humanity is destined for absolute satanic authoritarianism.