Serpents and Ladders – Introduction

As a child I regularly played the board game snakes & ladders with friends. Nevertheless any associations with subject matter used in this entry can be assumed incidental as the game merely attempts to mimic undulations of fate. Instead, here thematic material is broken into two basic streams of investigation. Initially I shall create an essential background featuring the Annunaki serpent (posh word for “snake”) lines. There I will attempt to lay the foundations bare and clear up some of those long established, divisive cultural myths. I have discussed the progressive links highlighting how Annunaki genetics have devolved as the human genome before, so this series of articles will go into much more detail, hopefully going some way towards resolving clarity. Assuming everything goes to plan, introductory findings will neatly compliment part two: revelations as to the complexity of human genetic ladders. I have noticed normal attention spans are insufficient for my extraordinarily “different” content. Therefore, shorter articles might bless a more worthy audience and I shall treat the first part as a prelude to part two. There may be several subsequent instalments as requiring subject matter is highly convoluted.

Because science behind the human genome project has more-or-less preconfigured conclusions to fit on-going politically charged preconceptions, information value to sincere researchers is limited. Though a couple of serious wobbles to the scoped narrative line have accorded an occasional borderline mainstream Media frenzy, these protests have always dwindled to teacup size. This is partly frustrated by the fact that trawling trillions beyond trillions of symptomatic markers (emphasising amino acid chains) does not even approximate the scope of real DNA as it is absent from normal sensory perception (or the five senses). “3D” DNA is confusing to laymen as non-nucleic mitochondrial genetic materials contain a shallower snapshot of development than male nuclear components. Consequentially mainstream science has made the extremely deceptive myth affirming announcement that the human came out of Africa courtesy of eight females dating somewhere between 250,000 and 350,000 years ago in order to support anthropologist Richard Dawkins’ babble. The information does camouflage some truth, but synchronistic revelation as to “what” will have to wait for my next article (part two). Bizarrely, the most authentic evidence of our genetic history can be found in the atomic layer as that is where fundamental existence progressive decisions are executed (and why radioactive fallout affects genetics). Unsurprisingly our vain scientists haven’t thought of looking there, or perhaps this is not so unexpected given establishment man Albert Einstein’s rabid fear of the quantum layer.

One of the problems facing the modern commercial scientist is an entrenched mindset which is a combination of “training” and “peer group pressure”. For instance (and this perhaps may appear a little facetious of me), the supposed master-geneticist Horace Drew runs a comic strip analysing “crop circles” under the pseudonym of Red Collie.  In that capacity, as well meaning and mathematically enlightening his calculations have been, he has failed to glean any association from the molecular frequency balls contained within a number of pictograms he has attempted to decode. It is remarkable one that preaches fervently about the ills of cognitive dissonance so obviously demonstrates acute symptoms. All “crop circles” (that are not made by mischievous human beings) are created by or for Grey Zeta Beings. There are numerous superficial clues, but no other entity can produce this style of multi-faceted logical transcendental messaging. British expert Colin Andrews has identified over a thousand different messages in a single diagram. Though I don’t regularly share his reflective opinions on meanings per se, he pushes the point home.

Changes in atomic frequencies are going to be directly associated with our so-called “ascension”. I am heartened by Michael Tellinger’s subliminal suggestions on the topic. He seems to know that silica quartz will open doorways unattainable for carbon based life forms. If only our scientists treated the atomic layer with a modicum of reverence they might start getting somewhere. Lack of reverence is a symptom of institutional arrogance. Symptomatic academic ignorance is no better demonstrated than by offering up my sacrificial lamb, Horace Drew, again. He, the scientist, has sadly shown he is blind to truth outside the narrow window of his expertise. To make matters worse, he is in no way the exception to the rule. Far from it; just about everyone in power is held prisoner by maligned, trendy belief systems. Mainstream science assures, with scant exception, thou shall not break those divine Newtonian-Cartesian empirical preconceptions. Therefore, were anyone to suggest that extra-dimensional influences located beyond the material plane inexorably affected “what is”; they would literally be branded insane by vogue populists and metaphorically horse whipped for their trouble. Yet the sour truth reveals that, due to our limited sensory perceptions, there are aspects of existence that simply cannot be experienced without consulting the dreaded paranormal. Beyond what seem to be impeccable calculations, Horace Drew’s “crop circle” “decodes” have been as much about preserving his credibility as any credibly honest investigation into the truth.

It is worth noting that Suzy Hansen’s book “Dual Soul Connection” illustrates human illness can be deciphered by coloured energy fields emitted by all living bodies contradicting Louis Pasteur’s celebrated pioneering achievements (though these I argue are deceptively contrived, twisting the evidence and accompanying opinions of the micro-biologist genius, Antoine Bechamp). Less famous spiritual healer, Barbara Brennan, identifies the same basic emissions as swirling energy vortices. Neither of the variants of these fields is visible to the eye nor can they be scientifically measured as such. Particular light frequencies do pick up human auras as rainbow effects, so mainstream science has not been completely shut out. The issue, of course, is not invariably mainstream witness and data collection unless political stakeholders order the process rigged. Problems begin and end with interpretations that churn out those endless babbling theories.

It is only when it comes to decoding truth that the picture clarifying how genetics work is rendered very cloudy, given the lack of attainable credible evidence that might validate conclusions. At best the image is “cropped”. What of those strange, fantastical, enigmas captured by ancient peoples that are clearly adrift of popular historic assessment of calculated intellectual, technical and human civilisation development, for instance? The result is truth is further distorted by deliberate and erroneous literal interpretations of deep historic texts geared to tweaking reconfigurations that validate current popular opinions on the way things were as best they can.  For instance, the preconception that ancient man was savage denies any notion of advanced medical practices. In principle all science-myths characterising the creation of Stonehenge propose savage cave men irrationally, mechanically and inexplicably carted very heavy stones (each weighing multiple tonnes) several hundred miles by hand for no specific reasons guided only by the whim of superstition.

Where present, in general, historic anomalies deemed worthy of scrutiny are mostly judged “unexplainable coincidences” when unfathomable.  Were science to seriously consider arguments supporting the notion that ancient knowledge goes way beyond anything we have in modern times; it would have to reinvent those heavily guarded narrative lines. Dissenters would certainly question whether the Chinese I-Ching document conceals a giant genome project in its own right. Just because the way information has been conveyed does not supplement modern scientific notation styles does not make it any less valid. Those than pander to this academic culture assure the quest for truth is always out of reach, particularly given earlier sentiment (i.e. if anything of substance could be categorically proven, science missionaries would go to any lengths to disprove it in order to preserve the status quo).

So-called historians are also infected by this type of fanaticism. With what started as a devilish act of promising research, Joseph P Farrell’s conclusions in “Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men: The Surviving Elites of the Cosmic War and their Hidden Agenda” withered to such a degree, they were frankly an embarrassment. Readers never learned what technologies, which parties and reasons or even if the speculated giant cosmic war “over Earth” 2.3 million years ago actually eventuated. He did surreptitiously introduce the Annunaki, but never elaborated his views on the concept. Given wayward, in some ways, equally irrelevant prognoses dressed as alternative histories by Zechariah Sitchin, Michael Tellinger, Gerald Clark and other genre theorists, perhaps this was the correct approach. Even so I was disappointed by Farrell’s book, which I felt copped out. The truth was too hard and commercial editorial pressures put an axe to the contents.

An army of unscrupulous shills anticipate suspected debunking opportunities to preserve political diktat. Farrell never stood a chance even if he had have “fessed up”. I make no secret of my admiration of Graham Hancock, but he is in the same boat. Very little acceptable concrete evidence can be used to buffer against “the system”. Look at the hysteria over the Bosnian pyramids with mainstream and alternative movements galvanising absolutist campaigns either “for” or “against” truth. Even there, should researchers favour “for”, datelines are entirely wrong as projected. Hancock’s appraisal that the Egyptian Sphinx was constructed in Earth’s precession cycle of Leo is correct. However, it was the one before the last term so dating is around 25,000 years out. Fortunately, Zeta truth codified in “crop circles” is infallible (even if Horace Drew fails to comprehend it). Suzy Hansen identifies her hosts simply as “Grey Beings”, yet these (as described) bear all the consistencies associated with the genus that originated from the Zeta Reticuli star system. These days the place is apparently overrun by reptilian conquistadors (according to Sanni Ceto and others), so I very much doubt they still have civilisation headquarters in the region. In fact I am informed by numerous sources that various humanoid types act as Zeta associates and, similar to Draco (reptilians), they have an active breeding/hybridisation program of their own.

At the highest dimensional levels, control and management of genetics is everything. By that I mean all other reasons for existence and existing are superfluous in comparison. We, pedestrian humans, are preformed and this means we have a very limited insight range compared to say, the Zeta Grey Beings. Matched against cosmic master geneticists of the ilk of the Anunaki, our skills/potential to comprehend would be classed as infantile, at best. At the very top of the existence pyramid are the Anunaki (one “n”) and these Time Lords are so lofty they approximate “God” in existential form. It is difficult to say with absolute certainty, but intuition tells me that there are potentially numerous mini-versions of the Anunaki too in the capacity of, shall we say, departmental premiers. Whether all or any of these have reached “Time Lord” status as well is debatable.

One of my regular visitors provided valued feedback on her pertinent liaisons with extra-dimensional entities furbishing additional clarity (and some intrigue besides) on the “senior” Anunaki Time Lord status. Indeed, her extra-dimensional informants did more than that. According to her version of their message, the “Anunaki” are viewed as “rogue” Time Lords by those in the know as they manipulated essential fields and processes in order to expand their own power base to the detriment of existence in general. Our [time] path is evidence of one of the numerous corresponding cracks in the network infrastructure as a consequence of this manipulation. Sixto Pas Well’s Ganymede (Jupiter moon) migrant visitors marginally corroborate the consideration as they have said in no uncertain terms that our time line simply “doesn’t exist”. Nevertheless, having been able to interrogate my blog visitor’s sources directly via subspace (note: this method is not infallible as I am often given a snapshot that matches the way I observe “reality” rather than direct transference of the host’s perception, encouraging variance and potentially significant gaps or shortfalls in interpretations of truth), I question whether they refer to “ultimate beings” or the mini-version subordinates. As they (my blog visitor’s sources) appear to me to be located in the light realms (dimensionally below thought), I wonder whether they can effectively access and thoroughly represent a complete picture.

Because there are so many different states, things can become rather complicated even after rudimentary scrutiny. Therefore understanding bequeaths the names Annunaki, Enki and Enlil are not merely fanciful, exotic-sounding titles but actually all mean something. In addition, they could have each been used thousands of times or more over the ages to signify entity types or groups that satisfied generalised qualities around nominal word values. For instance, Annunaki is broken into “An”, “Nun” and “Aki”. In prehistoric terms this means An represents the “binding invisible force”, Nun is compared to “darkness” and Aki the “light”. Extrapolating further, prehistoric darkness is not our superficial “colour” (or lack of), but, rather, the primordial dark waters of infinity. Some might suppose this adequately supports the fertile ooze notion evolutionists claim was at the root of man’s origins, but not so. The term refers to space which contains a sea of undetectable atomic matter used to create everything; animate and inanimate. Hearteningly, mainstream science is beginning to see the light and some cosmologists argue space behaves like a giant ocean now. As for “Aki”, well this is closer to bedazzlement, will or spirit as the combination of maternal/paternal (essence) so it is much, much more than mere light.

Those that have pawed through rambunctious literatures produced by Zechariah Sitchin will have encountered his versions of the notorious Enki and Enlil. Just because he has a large posthumous following, does not mean his opinions are beyond reproach. Frankly I insist, knowing what I know, they are littered with errors, guided by a rancid political agenda I can only assume is directed by Israel’s right wing archaeological establishment. First up, these characters (Enki, Enlil, Inanna et al) were not Anunaki beings. Anunaki is something like an entire network of stars separated by trillions of light years. How about that for a single organism! One might intelligently argue that some representations of Enki, Enlil were Anunaki cohorts. Indeed, original manifestations (way beyond physical) were known only as Ba’al. Confusingly, given biblical connotations, Ba’al is the group name given to the different guises of “God” (Annunaki/Anunaki) in manifest form. Are you all still with me? The “double n” Annunaki is complete non-manifest God and “single n” Anunaki(s) is/are [incomplete as aspects of the whole] manifest God(s). Ba’al personifies as many guises as required to satisfy the complete refracted character of the Annunaki distributed by Anunaki overlords. Initially, per that dynamic, it could be argued the two most significant divides (if that’s the right term) are individual versus group. Thus, concepts Enki and Enlil were born. Translation of terms offers succinct clarity. “En” “Ki” compares to “spirit inside” (or individual traits). “En” “Lil” is “the whole converging at one point within” (or “everything” represented as “a single entity”). That is why ancient texts posit Enki as the gene master (augmenting individuality) and Enlil as “God” (common view of the “great group”).

It is difficult to precisely ascertain the reasons for snakes or serpents as the original preferred form. I have theorised that creatures living in ocean environments might prefer flexible bodies to manipulate tides, but it may be something else. In fact the octopus might best approximate the optimum original manifest design but it was later, several hundred million years ago, that dragons personified those sleek, slithering bodies that would truncate to become boas that populate our dense tropical jungles, vipers for arid, desert regions and numerous other basilisk varieties suiting varying lifestyles on modern planet Earth. The serpent once was the dragon and Jacque Fresco (of the Venus Project) knows they learn quickly. I feel the adage “once bitten twice shy” cannily assesses ophidian libido. Enki, in physical form, is best described as an alligator headed sea monster supporting multiple tentacles. Incidentally, located in extra-dimensional realms exists a strange humanoid, very tall and crocodilian headed. It is not the slightest bit fierce, but has such a fearsome intellect; it would put the brightest human to shame. Unable to manifest in the plane we call D3 or “third dimension” at all, Enki [the “being”] had extraordinary psi-powers, including refined telekinesis, the ability to spontaneously create and numerous senses unavailable or alien to humanity.

To configure all the layers that comprise Annunaki, as an absolute, would effectively accommodate several encyclopaedias worth of differences. Suffice to say, housed in those undiscovered sections, reptilian and dragon hierarchies have their own immaculate angels etched from light making human obsessions over morally good and evil (at best) deeply prejudicial. The term “light” is so oversimplified per our binary definition; it is surprising we glean even an inkling of spirituality (that which comes from star light). Our mundane observation of spectral qualities, separated by colour grades, is a small part of spiritual consequence. Albert Einstein’s ignorance neglected a number of fields that would help distinguish the many different states of photons currently disguising light’s potential. For those that think I am being unfair, principled materialism assures that if everyone was rendered sight blind and without memory, the light spectrum would cease to exist. Imagination, to these philistines, is worthless. Einstein was a clansman that replicated anything that satisfied his peer group and mischievously rejected all considerations that appeared to contravene ambition guided by precipitous order to the detriment of true science. The great human group has no right to censor existence as a consequence of limited experiential capability. Open minds will herald a renaissance for true science.

Discounting the differing manifest proto-physical effects that might be witnessed by ultra-sensory beings, each broad “type” has its own domain with underlings at varying stages of development overseen by angelic guiding ambassadors (with their own hierarchies). Thus, there may be 100’s or 1000’s of increments in the chains of command all the way up to utopian nirvana. Could we call these divine ladders? I delve into this, though perhaps not quite in the same way as outlined here, in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” (PayPal donations preferred by those that take the purchase plunge & the cheeky request for $800 contains a lot of tongue). Sentiment that challenges standard material belief systems hides the queasy question; is DNA concrete evidence for God if processes are found to be ordained by the atomic layer (i.e. light)? Light is the only “thing” (or, perhaps, material essence is better terminology) human can manufacture out of nothing. If it isn’t considered to be something, why don’t the rules for existence change? Empirical science observes symptoms, looks for material (measurable) causes but invariably applies rancid philosophy by the seat of the pants. Philosophically, science has no idea why fire exists as the manifest chain reaction and physical effect of combustion. The technological quacks may as well boom “God decreed it and it was so”.

According to ancient sources, the Annunaki (i.e. group God as the premise for manifestation) “split” at some distant past. This point marked a significant percentage of intent choosing the face of man over the serpent (even though, initially, the face of man grotesquely appeared on an octopus like monster). Those that refer to Genesis 1:27 “So God created mankind in his own image….” have been mostly guided by superstitions that suppose meanings. In isolation the verse, simplistically, suggests the creators of man looked like him. Let us review the appearance of our creators to verify accuracy here. Pteroid mammalians (creators of man) perambulate upright, having arms, legs and basic facial features (i.e. possession of two ears, a pair of eyes, nose and mouth) matching ours. Ciakar reptilians (creators of hu-man) are the same. Thus, the (Draco) makers of man and human were superficially identical and if either was used as evidence they would validate Genesis 1:27. The verse was not some kind of mumbo jumbo pulled out of thin air by intoxicated primitives.

Of course, detailed scrutiny of truth would reveal a very different picture that pieces together polar extremes ranging from human comparable extraordinary likenesses found in aspects of body parts or design to unfathomable resemblances that are quite unrecognisable as anything to do with man. It is for that reason there is a chasm that separates “creators” and “created”. Also, we must never lose sight of the fact that they are very different to us. In accordance with the ascension, Annunaki spheres of influence (figuratively represented in the Mahabharata Bhagavad Gita as the “Zoroastrian style” 1000 headed cobra representing a fan of intentions from despicable to supreme) could return at any time and this will perhaps exacerbate differences between us and them (our Draco masters). These differences have been visibly played out as global control politics and that ever more corrupt extra-terrestrial “disclosure movement”. Even so (and this might well shock some of you) I am heartened to note that in addition to their angelic light beings, senior ranked Ciakars and all fully fledged Pteroids possess wings that supplement other accoutrements. Adding further credence to my explanation; is this not what an ignorant, superstitious “primitive” might expect of angels?

The Mystery of Hu Gadam and Pantheism

Perhaps there are many reasons for my exposing the unbreakable, intrinsic connection between Hu Gadam and pantheism now. Most recently, I have seen an increase in the abuse of the use of the connotation “Lucifer” (a relative of Hu Gadam), so that has definitely enflamed my motives (as I am a truth giver). Of course the word Lucifer is meaningless without connotation, but I shall check the etymology to try to identify when the corruption began. Well, I’m pleasantly surprised. Its origins, I am casually informed, come from Latin. The words luc or lux combined with fer mean “light bearer”. This, my common source informs me was the common name given to the Morning Star. The same source cites an obscure Christian Morning Star connection with Satan, which I must say is rather interesting. As I inform readers in my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, Satan was a heavenly body. He/she/it was no ordinary star as She [I use in place of they to confuse auto-editor] was the very first luminance (check biblical Genesis 1:3 John 1:5 or Revelation 21:23) to bless the cosmos. The will of the feminine obscured and overwhelmed the male aspect of existence for a while, but when the outcast male discovered the flaw, error came into being (Nag Hamadi: Apochryphon of John). She, our Satan Star, collapsed under the weight of remorse and is now known as the Black Sun which has theoretically been identified by NASA as being located somewhere around the centre of the Milky Way. The so-called Mayans (what the Lemurians became or turned into) knew She was the spigot of our universe as expressed by their water wheel analogy.

Even so, beyond the uncomfortable fact that everything is one and the cataclysmic enterprise, Satan, has no lateral connection with Lucifer as neither does the Morning Star, all feature through consequence of serious consideration as to what pantheism is and its portrayal of life as a continuous system canonised by its cycles. Last post I emphasised the lack of power human beings convey. Compared to universal beings we are far less significant than atoms. Moreover, we have demoted our potential. Yet, in my book, I boldly state “we are God’s fingertips”. In other words, a single human life (as a complete experience) might feel like gently brushing against ferns while walking in the bush to them (the Gods that we represent). Everything we thought was important, including all those new age dramas expressed as end of world crisis, is irrelevant to them. To them everything will change to suit the cycle and if we have the collective ability to make it so or not, so be it. The new way, while it lasts, will give just as much life and, if not, the weak and sickly will succumb to those with greater power and resolve. Thus, rebirth is stronger and more resilient. That is the process of illumination. Human beings love scapegoats. We can’t face the truth unless it suits us and that is why we constantly seek surrogates for our mistakes. Blame game is the pre-inclination of man.

Lucifer, the entity, does not exist, but pop culture conveys messages that are instinctive and clear. There is a general fear shared by human beings. This may be the result of the baggage collected by the group consciousness over the eons. However, no energetic personification (in absolute form) has any relevance. The fear is aggregated fantasy which has been exploited to the greater degree by the creators of illusion (fiction writers, film makers and so on). It is a genre and that’s it. There was an entity, being very much connected to Earth’s inherence and He was a rogue. The use of the word “rogue” expresses its most positive aspect in this instance. I cannot say this roguish entity was symbolically comparable to Robin Hood, for instance, but that would demonstrate how enterprising rogues can mean everything valiant for the human heart. In this particular case, our roguish entity was deeply connected to Earth’s inherence and, in that capacity, defied white light order. He proposed, drafted and implemented an entirely new life cycle system that had never been considered before. It was and is a system that has been famously paraphrased by evolutionists as “the survival of the fittest”. Whilst Darwin’s conclusions are almost entirely wrong and the evolutionists need to expansively redraft their ideas as to what “survival” is and what “fittest” really means, the balance of life is an exaggeration; a hyperbole.

Though the entity in question (our rogue) has an unpronounceable name that partly sounds like wind striping away at crags in a sandstorm, “Lucifer” has been the convenient substitute. There is some malice to this, as the entities that support white light systems are the ones that invariably provide channelled information streams for “the benefit” of Humanity. They know the way they use Lucifer is not comparable to the one of human, can I say, folklore. In my opinion they deliberately transfer the negative connotations to receivers for added impact (i.e. propaganda from the nether regions). In fairness to them (I regularly relay direct accounts of human sloth on my other blog) what better way of pricking the attention than using one of the most historically enigmatic names of all time? Be your own judge, but don’t ever be swayed into assuming that light beings and other guides work exclusively for your best interests. They have their own agendas which promote mutually beneficial payoffs. Over the years I have met a lot of people that were important members of Atlantis society (white light sensitive). As I discuss in 450,000 Years of Unquantified Earth History, the peoples of Atlantis were not human, or, rather, key societal figures (those stakeholders in community interests) were Martians complimenting one aspect of our DNA. Modern human reincarnates tend to assure themselves and others that you (as individuals) are masters of your own illusion. Values tend to predictably replicate white light traditions, such as strict vegetarianism.

Last Australian tour (2013?), Sixto Paz Wells, famous for his relationship with fourth dimensional Lemurians (though I don’t recall him identifying them as such), explained how “Lucifer” intervened with Earth’s development. They said that “Lucifer” was an archangel (sound being: sound beings are higher in dimensional status than light beings). He (Lucifer), alone, hatched a new way, a new beginning for creation. The other elders did not like the blueprint, but neither could they find fault nor just reason to oppose it, so it was authorised. Beginning around 340 million years ago (give or take) the life system now known as the dinosaurs changed existence. I haven’t checked and don’t really care when the palaeontologists claim dinosaurs began to evolve. My sources are far more pure, far more accurate and far more knowing. Putting examining pertinence, precision of dates to one side, it now starts to get interesting. “Lucifer” only hatched the plan, which was complete. Underlings facilitated orders. There is a gap in my source material, but it is easily guessed. I don’t know exactly what commissioned the dragons, but they were the geneticists that manufactured all the new Earth species prototypes using their own DNA catalogue. Dragons now have evolved as fourth to fifth dimensional life forces but will always be cohorts (progeny) of Ba’al (plural). Unlike Ba’al (all unique beings without reproductive capability) they are a species set with numerous varieties. Ba’al is the [group] manifestation of the Annunaki and, therefore, “Lucifer” must be the being(s) the Sumerians called the highest God (God almighty). By deduction He must have been a stage/state between Ba’al and the cubed light Annunaki.

Sumerian devotion would not be understood today. In those times, for the early period, humans knew the power of communion. That changed when the Draco (assisted by Zeta Grey Beings) installed meta-physical frequency fences which acted as limiters on our DNA.  When I use the term Draco (Pteroids and Ciakars combined), I feel sure this was a control freak initiative and that can only point to Ciakar (reptilian) meddling. Whilst the Zetas offer a chirpy, witty, laid back veneer, underneath they too are patiently obsessive. To the intrepid third party observer, hideous appearance, extreme mood swings and carnivorous sexual behaviour is all that separates the Ciakar from the Zeta. For my analysis, every single recognised Zeta-human channel either wears a powerful reptilian overcoat or has conspicuous viperous guides. Hu Gadam’s influence has been forsaken. We, hu-apes, have been dismembered for our heads don’t understand our bodies. That is why sexual potency is the greatest of all “sins” (sic) and children must be “innocent”.

Though the Pope Lick Monster is another inspiration for this post, there are many tales and artefacts which demonstrate a very different reality to mainstream proprietary history. Goat-like humanoids of different sizes and statures are rare but far from unheard of. A rather strange skull with significant horn protrusions disappeared from an American local museum not that long ago. Other objet d’art have been supressed in different or similar ways. This suggests someone does not want the evidence scrutinised. If that is the case, logic further impresses that stakeholders in the preservation of current mainstream history illusion have the most to lose by allowing scrutiny of potential loose cannons that might break it. In addition, though the Pope Lick Monster is interesting and authentically unusual (I would, perhaps, go as far to say genuine), it is not evidence of Hu Gadam. A more likely cause might be one hatched by the miscreants behind the New World Order and so-called “powers that be”. Be very clear that global politics is controlled from above and string pullers are not-of-this-Earth in the traditional sense.

There is one photograph I know of depicting the Pope Lick Monster. Courtesy of Photoshop, the print has been coloured and disambiguated in numerous ways. It could be a fake, but it is so convincing it could be natural. Energy signatures never lie but sometimes can confuse readers into false beliefs. In this case, if all viewers that witnessed the image shared the belief it was real, energetically it would become “real” (but only in consistence with the beliefs). Hypothetically, there would be a lingering doubt as all viewers of the unknown are natural sceptics. Per this paradigm, the item that is a fake would become real through consequence of belief only, but that reality would also be tinged with doubt (due to the sceptical nature of man). When I analyse the picture (above) from the energetic perspective, I do indeed find a lingering doubt in favour of authenticity. Does this mean it is a fake after all? No, because the energetic signature could also be its authenticity and lingering doubt might represent the fact the exhibit had been played around with (i.e. enhanced using Photoshop). So, in this case, an energetic reading is not going to be very reliable unless the reader can go beyond the frame of the picture. In this case, for some eerie reason, I cannot dial into it. I don’t know whether they have done something in the creation process (of the creature), but I cannot locate (pinpoint) its DNA beyond drawing superficial character swabs in situ.

When I evaluate physical traits (of the form), I find anomalies I don’t believe could be the inspiration of “Photoshop”. Some of the features would require such patience and tactile craftsmanship, without super-human skills and a massive commercial purse, no one would bother (assuming they had the technique, which would need to be better than any Photoshop evidence I have ever reviewed in my life). Pushing aside the characteristic ears and large horns which are not glued on and the very strange inhumane facial features, the feet and the hands (in particular) are the giveaways as to the validity of this evidence. Remember, I have other skills too. Years ago, I acted as philatelic expert and valuer for a number of prestigious auction houses. I was given the unfavourable task of discerning which of the French 1849 Ceres 1 franc vermilions were originals or Jean de Sperati forgeries. The only way to do that was applying absolute attention to detail. I look at the photograph that apparently features the Pope Lick Monster and I find evidence to be congruous. The hands, on first glance, appear to support long talons or claws. This may improve the monster identity, but on closer inspection, the talons are in fact fingers – extremely long, thin fingers (and thumb that sticks out) that are like nothing I have ever seen before. One hand is rather blotted out by light, but, gauging perspective, it is the same as its partner. My eyes do not deceive me. Before me is an extraordinary Photoshop product, far better than anything Jean de Sperati (the forger that fooled the experts) could produce. Too good, it surely must be real.

Then there are those very odd feet: two clear, but probably three “camel” toes which are not hooved. If some imaginative person with skills wanted to create a Satyr, they would surely give it horns and hooves, no? The type of foot is not only nothing like anything comparable (other than the Camel’s) but also clearly belongs. There is no familiar cut & paste smudge. In addition, the monster’s physique is not impossibly human, but very streamline, very authentically muscular. This print must be real and if anyone came forward (including the person that released the picture) and claimed it was a fake, I could only be compelled to bellow, “Liar, create another just like it while I watch you.” Whether its origins are from Pope Lick Creek remains unconfirmed.

Making the well calculated assumption the photograph is genuine, what is the creature? It seems to be a liberal example of Satyr. The legs aren’t very hairy. Neither is much apparent around the body, but as a best case, the Satyr is the closest answer to something known (albeit mythical). According to Wikipedia (a tainted but occasionally useful information resource), there are two spurious references in the verses of biblical book of Isaiah (which, though is hard to date, likely precedes the Greek classical period). In Leviticus (17:7) the practice of sacrificing se’irim (Heb he-goats with the colloquial additional meaning – devil) maybe a derivative of the Arabian legend azabb al-‘akaba (shaggy demon of the mountain pass). Also the lexicographer, Robert Beekes, suggests Greek Saturos may have (I presume) Aryan-Slavic origins, although their “wood nymphs” are called leshii. Rather than being demonstrably violent, myths have portrayed these creatures as being lewd and decadent, virile and overtly sexually promiscuous. If they were to be labelled devils, it would be as impish fornicating womanisers and not as psychotic fiends.

Conspicuously, the creature depicted crouches over its fallen prey (presumably a man of unknown origin). It scowls at and attempts to strike the photographer. Consequentially, the beast is naked, but not lewd. There is no figurative sexual interplay; no residual energy. This is anger and hate and desire combined; virility yes, but not even a glimmer of illicit passion. This is not the Satyr of ancient Russian and Greek mythology. This is something very different. So what is it? If I carefully review the photographic evidence again, I note that the eyes are closed; perhaps blinded by the flashlight. It is a shame because the expression “the eyes are the windows to the soul” is not an aimless one. The best way, for an energy reader, to securely pinpoint origins is via those portals to holistic DNA. I, we, have been closed off, shut out by the miracle of technology that allowed us to glimpse at this creature of dubious status. Yet, other than the rather oddly accentuated neck region (partially obscured by flashlight), the torso looks remarkably human – a young man with exceptional physique after a workout, I would say. The leg calves are well formed (look at the lightened one carefully), thighs compact. Taking away the bizarre accoutrements, it could be human. But those accoutrements also make it clearly not human. It is a human hybrid.

Who or what made it? Is it one of those noxious black military secrets? Why under the US Norfolk Southern Railway trestle above Pope Lick Creek (assuming that is the location)? Rumours had been circulating since the 1930’s or perhaps prior. The mystery was such to inspire a cheesy 70’s movie. I haven’t seen the film so it may also be serious, exquisitely revealing, but it didn’t ever make my TV screen in my formative years, so I can only assume it didn’t make the grade. It wasn’t very good. But if someone tells me otherwise, I’ll go seek it out. The point is that knowledge of this (or these) creature stretches back for the best part of a hundred years or, perhaps, beyond. That’s a long time to keep the lid on a black military op. No, definitely, that’s not it. This is something else. I think this is evidence of supposed extra-terrestrial genetic experiments that are actually very much terrestrial (of this Earth). They (the aliens), their power structures, are so much more advanced of us that they can, more or less, operate hidden in plain sight. There is only one group with the skills to produce something like this that might qualify. In my opinion, this is the product of Hu Gadam on the Earth plane. This is an attempt to turn man into something more.

Do I see our hybrid as evidence of Hu Gadam at work? Not on your life. We know the Satyr is mostly a happy-go-lucky, boozy pervert that casts illicit spells over God fearing women and girls transforming them into fertile nymphs. Sacrilege (according to the Puritans)! Hu Gadam would never create a violent, sadistic axe murdering siren. Let’s check out that photo again for more clues. Ah ha, I think you all spot it but do you see? Look really carefully. Look at those strange paws. I symbolically chose the “camel’s toe”; but that ain’t no camel! Anyone checked out the “chook’s feet” of a Ciakar reptilian recently? Look no further. It’s right before your eyes! That is precisely what you should see if you were witnessing Draco Ciakar feet. They love to disguise hallmarks in plain sight that the suckers (human cattle) won’t notice (see), but, albeit with a little help from me, you’ve all noticed. We [now] know this is the Ciakar [long standing] ruse as an attempt to make Hu Gadam look bad, appear monstrous in order to deny humans evidence of our Pteroid roots.

Remember the humble beginnings of this treatise when I offered some truth about Lucifer. Did any of you think it odd that he was a light bearer, given the tradition that the biblical Elohim are light beings and the importance of light “conquering darkness” in the selected opening verses of John’s gospel (the one plausibly written by “Jesus” himself)? Might the adroit ignorance amongst “Christians” generally as to the humble etymology of “Lucifer” have some bearing (excuse the pun) on this? Could dark forces (perhaps aligned to Draco Ciakar factions) have pulled a switcheroo to confuse brethren in the Middle Ages or perhaps just after the breakup of the Roman Empire? Once Latin went out of fashion it would only be a matter of time before light could be dark and dark light. In fact there is only one biblical reference that counts, because any other would have simply relied on it for guidance and this proposes an alternative explanation. Isaiah 14:12 reads per my translation:

“How have you fallen from the heavens, Lucifer (note: perhaps the Morning Star); the consequence of your fall has subjugated nations”

The superstitions over Lucifer came about as part of a progressive strategic enterprise designed to cultivate the “right to control”. According to the naïve view, if humanity was only answerable to God, would an angelic heavenly agent dare to subjugate us, innocently or not, he/she/it must be a blasphemer. Because this message is irrelevant and incorrect (permanently lionizing our [fake] sun as “God”), it has permitted eternal debate for corrupt enterprises. It pre-supposes that we are biological robots, incapable of deliberate choice; otherwise Lucifer (as described) would only be able to subjugate those of us with character flaws. At least one interpretation of the implied accrued consequences casts Jesus as Satan. In fact, common sense dictates those that inspired the metaphorical Tower of Babel account worshiped the Morning or the Day Star (depending on which version you prefer) and Lucifer (as its standard) inspired anti-pharisaic licentious behaviour. “Your pomp and music of your harps” seems very much in the spirit of Hu Gadam and pantheism, so I can only draw the conclusion that Isaiah, the stiff shirt, was twisted and tortured by the mirth and merriment of others. He was definitely no Robin Hood.

Certainly from the very many and varied references I have collected, this (Isaiah’s attitude) is a noteworthy Ciakar trait. They love to ruin the fun of others, providing it doesn’t affect their own unseemly ambitions. This style of aggravated tyranny is consistent with the Puritan brand of Christianity. For clarity, Puritan synonyms include Pharisee or prig. Those still not clear as to relevance deserve a lexicon reference. Prig means “a self-righteously moralistic person who behaves as if they are superior to others” or “hypocrite”. In addition, the use of the concept of the falling star as a racial divide against the rising run (covert paganism) is a direct attack on pantheism which takes the view that error (fall) is far more important than success (rise). To become the brightest of all stars you must first have travelled the rite of passage. The Phoenix bird always renews more illuminated and stronger from the ashes.

Elsewhere in the Bible we find greater attention to truth and less to hypocritical whim. The ultimate clue is given in Genesis’ Adam and Eve. Genesis 2:19

“Now the Lord God (Hu Gadam) had formed out of the ground (genetic culture) all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man (Homo erectus or Neanderthal) to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature; that was its name.”

This is a very enigmatic passage which is made more so by the token that no one understands what it means. It is referring to a genetic catalogue that is crowned by man. The catalogue is so vast and complete it was used to create every single bird and animal on the planet surface and that is why man only had the right to name all his creatures, for they were his DNA. That is also the Hu Gadam connection to pantheism. Nature, in its entirety, not merely the creatures, was created from a solitary gene pool. Everything on the material plane, apart from the outsiders (the aliens), belongs as everything is related through genetic ancestry.  Therefore the celebration of that which is natural and vital is not an option for the truly zealous; it is life itself. That is Hu Gadam’s pantheism.