Tag Archives: hu-man

Saturn, Influential Time-lords and Separatist Sirians

Standard
Saturn, Influential Time-lords and Separatist Sirians

Ever since new human began reporting on the incubus of his reflective observations, history has managed to precariously chart ongoing and endless conflicts between emotional and intellectual persuasions. Accordingly, this piece originally inspired to follow the title “Science Myth Exploded – Hu Man and the Sirian Factor” in a perhaps vain attempt to comprehend the whys and wherefores of turbulent historic saga. In emotional terms, could compassion and conscientiousness ever be separated? On reflection, the answer to that question is “quite possibly” but, as importantly, how does that reference to the dark mystery that surrounds competent understanding of the hubris of our species’ conception and evolution? The Human Genome Project, according to Alex Collier, had identified more than twenty alien genetic lines or traits of humanity at the time of his announcement. He is not a professional geneticist and perhaps that information is too liberal for academic tastes, but it serves the purpose of reinforcing the point I am about to make. In light of this I have also possibly been over liberal myself in the use of the word species. For clarity, I have continued to maintain terms that convey humanity actually mirrors different batches of hybrids when discussing occasioned associated genome makeup. Thankfully, analytical evidence emerging from the project largely supports the potential for that view to be pertinent.

It is only when I try and extrapolate the components that have been specifically used to build the human hybrid that I run into severe formal identity problems. One of the great mysteries, for instance, is how logic and emotion can work in unison at all. We invariably take the truth for granted. Our brains are dual-functional. Doesn’t that propose the ultimate paradox? The magnificent cerebral cortex seems to have been crudely bolted onto an indefinitely inferior animalistic contraption. Take away his golden crown and human would become little more than a conceited, sickly ape (and I have encountered plenty of those with cerebral cortex intact). Therefore it is vital to assess origins and assign apt characterisations if any comprehension is to be gleaned at all. Where did the cerebral cortex come from?

Geneticists may well desire to supply tyrannies of confusion by way of their explanatory resolve, but they cannot overlook the fact it is found in no other creature on this planet. Are everyday apes or other mammals without one blessed with intellectual prowess? At least one mature gorilla has been rated with a human mental age of six by psychologists. Work done under Hilter’s regime in Germany tested dogs’ philosophic belief systems communicated via Morse code. Results revealed simplistic values that would match those of human toddlers. Even so, ironically, if there was any materialistic part of us that might be blamed for “causing” our mortality, the cerebral cortex would be it. By chance, competent thorough understanding of latent holistic spiritual “activation” power would significantly extend potential lifespans.

Of course many other factors would need to be addressed too. Dedication to war and pollution would have to cease without compromise. I know of no one that can verify why our life force permits disease (and death). Responding “it just does” highlights the ignorance of those that supposedly care. Committed attention to discovery will demystify every cause. Also, it is all well and good to wish for an absence of war and pollution, but how can we practically be at peace with our environment and ourselves? Solutions are definitely hampered by a lack of “tolerance”. Therefore, what is the ceiling to “human group” tolerance? This is an important question, because if we are not careful, on our current path, we will destroy ourselves through pain of ineptitude.

Perhaps we need to look farther afield for alternatives. Have there been other alien cultures whose legacies are able to provide insight as to how to construct utopian existence? A symptom of the perilous human course has encapsulated an ongoing contest between “group think” colonists against (largely a feature of devoted oppression) “sovereign” individuals. The psychology of this is well argued by Jon Rappoport. I recommend investigation of his extensive writings. It is also a subject that made a brief appearance last article. By that vein, I was given the opportunity to introduce the Pleiadians. These enigmatically loveable “aliens” are arguably evidence of ancient attempts to “bridge” Martian and ape.

Apes, it might shock readers to know, are simple versions of “reptilians”. They, in this capacity, act as manifestly inferior agents of the “Draco” (an affiliation of reptilian and other species). The lower the vibrational state, the more a civilisation relies on emotional interactions and boundaries.  Nonetheless, under these terms, apes still vaguely demonstrate basic hallmarks of Draco Pteroid and Ciakar social character. Pteroids, I have mentioned before, are the substantive product of Pterodactyl DNA. Creating body “upgrades“, they used their own DNA template (coupling with additional genetic materials emphasising Tyrannosaur) to mould Ciakar. By comparison, incidentally, human being should be classed as best of breeds as he not only incorporates both DNA sets from the Pteroid/Ciakar catalogues but also has a range of other components (albeit in present crimped form most are dysfunctional) which make him cosmically “unique”.

Gene functionality is rarely understood. For instance, considering scientists laughably propose that, from their genetic perspective, Tyrannosaurus Rex is closest related to a “domestic chicken”, formal review of how plausible “divine” engineering might or might not function is more or less non-existent. It is largely this realisation that has motivated my desire to “fill the void” left by science. Correspondingly, the need to somewhat broaden the investigative range of this essay as a remedy for terminal ignorance has become my new transitional goal. It is clear that discussions should wander into alien territories if malfeasant science is to be thwarted and, in that regard, “Science Myth Exploded – Hu Man and the Sirian Factor” is simply too refined, too insular for the task.

To test sufficient understanding as to significantly why things have transpired in the way they have beckons for a stereoscopic “big picture” presentation. We need to go right to the top to get to the bottom of this. I must make discordant waves and ask the big questions if my dedication to the mission is to be suitably reflective. My decision on a new title sufficiently primed to open up mind doors therefore reads as follows. “Saturn, Influential Time-lords and Separatist Sirians” inspires me.  Hopefully essay conclusions will inspire my readership too and vilify that corrective adjustment. So without further ado, I’ll kick off with the first associated investigative quest.

Putting it bluntly, who or what are these vigilant separatist Sirians?

Though I don’t think ever mentioned “by name”, written and unwritten history reflects on their involvement with several Atlantis civilisations. That, therefore, seems the logical place to embark on the quest. In addition to what I revealed last article, I can now highlight the language of the most ancient Atlantis civilisation (on Mars) did not convey the negative or “anti” sense of anything. By example, my prior use of the word “dysfunctional” is untranslatable and possibly meaningless to those distant peoples. There is a reason for this, of course. There are always reasons for everything, even if reasoning appears unfathomable per insular cultural identity.

Going right back to the beginning, when time was at its dawn, insular negativity had such an effect on the whole, it began holding the serpentine Anunaki back. No one can precisely say “when”, but at some juncture the focus on detraction evolved to such a point it reached “schism”. Though the mythos had not identified an independent branch yet, group view concluded “Sirian” (as is known now) obsession was the cause of internal acrimony. Comparable incidence in human Earth communities identifies with the case of the peoples of India who annexed separatist Pakistan because sovereign dependent desire became incompatible with the whole. When developmental differences become too toxic for popular enlightened cooperation, the only excusable recourse is separation. Per almost identical philosophy, the ophidian group created the Martian-Sirian offshoot in order to purge itself of badness (to use the vernacular).

Here is where it becomes clear why Sirians refrained from the use of negatives in their original language. Once umbilical detached from the Anunaki, they presumed the cause of the crossroads was their infinite superiority (goodness) over the other.  Per these conditions, they supported an unyielding observation towards (belief in was my original choice of description, but I now feel terminology is specifically erroneous) “intellectualisation of truth”. Indeed their knowledge was considered so pure, lateral translation could not separate out “existential divinity”. Their knowledge and their tongue was effective “word of God”, or so they persuaded themselves. It was an outlook that proposed if creation’s direction was purposeful, then only terms that embraced progressive purposefulness were necessary. Negativity, by correlation, viscerally blocks positivity. As all words ultimately support or defy calculated practices, dissenting reflections were deemed creatively obstructive. Hence, anti-expressions were not possible in maiden Atlantis dialogue. There were no words to craft thoughts of this type.

Ophidian isolation did not come about through breeds of idealism. Instead, divisions were arguably considered necessary for survival. Sirians viewed control as something that was “preordained” (conceptually manipulated by the Sephardim under terms of “Ra” on Earth) and in order to append their engaging zeal, they have contaminated one star system not to mention destroying numerous heavenly bodies over the eons.  In conjunction with this, highlighted by Gnostic rebuke of the Pharisees for their forgetfulness, over-zealousness preceded an abominable “God complex”. Insular Sirian wisdom ended up supporting vicious enlightenment to such a degree that, for all other “alien” entities, submissive cooperation was the only “peaceful option” (for those ensconced within social range). Consequentially, the responding route to salvation reads like a tragic roadmap and though there probably was a need for linguistic negatives, none were permissible. Their precise formulas were so exacting, “experimentation” or divergence from “the path” was pointless. Perhaps ironically, the ancient Atlantis language did have several words that contextually conveyed reflective meanings of “no” so it was eminently possible to rebel.

Compared to Sirians, ophidian reptilians (which by no means identify with reptiles on Earth) are all faithless. Long did I presume they adore laws (the apex of control) but, strictly speaking, it could be said the reverse is so. Nevertheless they are certainly captivated by them and for good reason. Social networks are very important to Sephardic reptilians in particular. That said; each network has its own set of vibes, rites and traditions. Their lawmakers were very clever when they conceptualised popular solutions. They managed, somehow, to abridge all these differing vibes and other political considerations into something everyone could “tune to”. The solution was to zone and tier laws because standardisation only ever promotes cultural division and conflict. In some ways their justice mechanisms are identical to ours. The significant difference is they have managed to brilliantly integrate Sirian philosophy into active reasoning that supports the many and varied characterisations ultimately defining harmonious social interaction which are “society”.

Our “powers” brag about being Atlantis seeds in private, but the reality is as clear as day.  They simply do not comprehend Sirian mindset, and the reflective transition that is our legal system has been a vocational disaster from conception, demonstrated by the truth that our laws cause more disputes than resolves. Capability to discern and apply aspects of Sirian mindset is embedded in the mechanics of our cerebral cortex. One symptom which might almost be classed as a “syndrome” is the conscience. Though it is unfathomably permissible to break conscience (attested in the manner humans deny truth to benefit self) every one of us instinctively knows right from wrong. When conflicts with “self” arise, we learn to look the other way, procrastinate and deceive ourselves. Rather interestingly it is impossible to distinctly arbitrate “right from wrong” as judgement relies on the precise order of each specific set of circumstances. “Laws” in that way largely frustrate sincere contemplation leading to effective and honest verdict.

A prior article of mine topically observed the custom whereby certain Sephardic Jews allegedly drop the “hu” from human in recognition only of standalone man. Man, according to this unspoken tradition, appears to signify our reptilian nature by default. In other places I have informed readers the “overlord” creators (specifically angelic dragons personifying creative instructions of Ba’al) of everything that lives on our planet surface today revered Tyrannosaurus Rex as their most supreme result. T-Rex was ultimate man to them. However, after a giant war in defence of Earth’s attack from Sirian ancestors, (but for preserved DNA) creator dragons witnessed this prized livestock perish. Utilising assets from war spoils after the Sirians defeat, they first created a new creature (proto man) from pterodactyl atomic DNA archives as they did not believe tyrannosaur would succeed under the changed climate conditions. But they always yearned for the return of majestic T-Rex.  The new creature (mentioned earlier) is colloquially known as “Pteroid” of course (though the dragons provided it with a name that is hard to pronounce) and it went through several phases of evolution before its celestial DNA ascended to spiritual status beyond the reality plane.

Originally Petroid was a fusion composed of components loosely comparable with bat, dog and ape. Did the Japanese creators of Godzilla and King Kong innocently pay homage to this unwritten prehistoric history? A battle between Tyrannosaurus Rex and Pteroid sounds like a thrilling affair to me. In these times “men” were true warriors and stone tables (such as the henges) offered braves sanctuary. Soldiers only fought honourable battles then. The warrior tradition of man in fact only subsided relatively recently, perhaps in the last few centuries of our timeline. Fanatical commerce changed the status of war forever. Don’t they say Camelot was the last real battle?

Here we should not lose sight of the fact that human spent a very long period on Mars (I will review this in more detail later) where terms of living were very different. Armed conflict between civilisations was impossible there and this was partly because our cerebral functionality was significantly enhanced at the time (arguably as much caused by the atmosphere and foods we ingested as any other contributors). Pteroid, a spectacular ape, had no cerebral cortex. Dragons inexplicably chose to censor the most important component of Sirian heritage, or so it appears on face value. Nevertheless, upon careful reflection, we will learn that they deliberately opted out and I shall outline reasoning presently.

In the same article where I made observations about Sephardic Jews, I also determined that “hu” represents ape, whereas (in a sense by default) “man” supplants reptilian nature. This conclusion was such an oversimplification of truth; I sadly fell into the propagandists’ trap. In fact, if comparable physiologies were available for cross-check, reinforcing my earlier sentiment, scientists would determine all apes are reptilian. “Hu”, preserved history informs, is an abbreviation of the Celtic (breakaway Jewish) God Hu Gaddam. After reviewing crude antique characterisations of appearance, there is no doubt that this is a “late stage of evolutionPteroid which visually presents as the mythical Satyr (one with a reputation for wine, women and song). Occult “Satanists” also often depict it as a strange goat headed, bare breasted “furry” figure (a gross pantheist metaphor). Are Baphomet’s “metaphorical” wings symbolic of mastery over the heavens?

Rather upsetting the apple cart, according to unofficial Jewish folklore (biblical texts are extraneous of the Talmud), human (Eve) was created from the side (rib) of man (Adam). Adam (which should not be confused with the gnosis of Sophia’s Yaldebroath), in this context, can only refer to the anthropological missing link Neanderthal ape. This particular version of Neanderthal would have also had to have been contemporary with the human creation date of around 125,000 years ago (i.e. if we could find a perfectly preserved example embalmed just before the cosmic war of 120-102,000BC, it could be used as evidence for human). Was, as tradition postulates, the Sephardic Jew to have rejected “Hu” in service to “man”, then a whole different emphasis is being tendered. In which case, what is the significant difference between “stylised ape” and “ape”? Do the Jews refer to the “reptilian” aspect after all?

Before I can make any credible assessments, it is important to thoroughly investigate that other “missing link”; the one that science refuses to even contemplate. Sometime prior to Pteroid’s destined transcendence to higher dimensions, his replacement was commissioned. Presumably largely the result of pressure from persistent dragons seeking vilification, it was decided that a new type of tyrannosaur would wander the Earth in Pteroid’s wake. Tyrannosaurus Rex was a vicious creature but it also had an extraordinary mind (I explain about true dinosaur brain functionality in this article). Liberally akin to modern day alligator and many times more productive than any human rancher, it could coordinate the herding and ambush of livestock with chilling efficiency. Nevertheless, there was a spiritual aspect to them as well and they could independently discern right from wrong. Parents, for instance, would never attack their own offspring.

A good example to demonstrate just how unstable tyrannosaur DNA can be when applied to hybridisation scenarios is emphasised in the celebrated account of late Phil Schneider’s violent subterranean encounter with a so-called “Tall Grey”. This “smelly trash can” (as Schneider poetically described it) is part “Zeta”. “Zeta” (presumed to originate from Zeta Reticuli) Grey Beings tick on the popular level of Star Wars “Yoda”. Amply revered as “wise men” by their peers, a reputation backed by a long history of logically passive “king making”, they are hereditary devout pacifists. Even their flexible DNA is widely used as a hybrid “binding agent” (perhaps similar to putty in construction). Enterprising reptilian Sephardim presumably theorised a more comprehensive gene application would make the ideal companion for tyrannosaur to tone down the aggression.

As Phil Schneider (lucky to survive the laser attack from the creature) painfully learnt, their experiment didn’t work and the legacy was a vocational catastrophe. Suzy Hansen informs us in her book “Dual Soul Connection” that Zetas (she calls them “Grey Beings”) draw vegetable matter through the skin by way of sustenance. Tall greys ingest nutrients in the same basic manner with one significant variation. Uniquely, they immerse themselves in special vats of living body fluids (blood and sinew) to “feast” heartily. Aside from their constant dreadful aroma, they suffer from vocational paranoia making them irrationally violent towards unknown “invaders”.

Thankfully the few subterranean Tall Greys that survive today are dying out, unable to naturally reproduce

Hybridisation is rarely easy or quick. For instance, I am led to believe the replacement for “Pteroid” took upwards of 700,000 years to gestate properly, and then further 100,000’s years were devoted to perfecting process results. Though Pteroids are given credit for the final creation, they originally referred affairs to superior dragons who, in turn, invited assistance from external (extra-terrestrial) entities prior to the project going ahead. Engagement led to political repercussions and some parties that had been excluded ended up giving input. The result was an alien mixed gene compound became the basis for the conceptual new direction of tyrannosaur/man. Simon Parkes has correctly reported that higher echelons of the Sephardim regard any form of menial work as something below their status. Therefore, reflectively, senior Pteroids would not likely have had hands on involvement with incubation cycles. Here I would imagine that exported aliens with the greatest interests in genetic assets took on roles as proxy team leaders to organise the equivalent of ((i.e. some other culturally versed formulaically cloned entities) today’s so-calledrobot grey” technicians.

Putting alien DNA and other potential “contaminants” to one side, new tyrannosaur man (Sephardim or “Ciakars” as they are colloquially known) was actually substantively old Pteroid. This not only meant that the Sephardim (group) were bestowed with identical Sirian genetics (ones absent of cerebral cortex remember), but, in effect, they were also technically humans too. Knowledge of which places considerable ambiguity as to the meaning of possible orthodox Jewish persuasion that “hu” should be stricken from man and rejected at all cost. Do they take umbrage at the dragons’ preference towards tyrannosaur?

In addition, why do they name Adam (a decisive “hu” relative) “man”? Are there “different connotations” of the term man at play here? Is that what I’m missing? There is another possibility too. Most illogically, separatist Jews perhaps refer to the hidden Sirian qualities expressed by our magnificent brains. This would be illogical because it would mean Genesis is misinterpreted. Under those auspices, “Eve” would have to be the wife of Adam (who is “man”) and not “human”. Confusions allayed, is man worshiped because of his divinity (cerebral cortex)? If so, how can we substantiate how “having a conscience” significantly changes adaptation to applicable collective social relationships?

Expanding that line of thinking, would it to be possible to attribute a different background to those “missing links” I highlighted earlier; a background that perhaps lays the foundation for other successfully purposeful Sirian hybridisation projects? My last article made the startling revelation that Pleiadians (in relation to this planet) were aquatic mer-people. I also exposed details on their extraordinary mentoring role over Atlantis civilisations here. Notably the largest social community under their umbrella was actually located where Egypt is today. Few are aware that the Great Pyramid of Giza landmark was a Sirian-Lemurian joint venture project constructed over 30,000 years ago to mark the boundary between Atlantis and Mu. I personally recall living near pyramids in a past life incarnation, a time when everyone seemed to wear lightweight pale linen tunics. If you stood too close to a pyramid it made you feel weird, presumable a consequence of wireless energy.  Then lands were heavily submerged and the amphibious Pleiadians found refuge in waterways.

In correction of last article’s vital omission concerning Pleiadians

Thankfully occasional perceptive commenters do exist. Last article something drew my attention in the responses section (were “cosmic forces” at odds with me? I had to rescue the item from the website spam filter). Completely overlooked prior, suffice to say, never before had I rationalised that [Atlantis located] Pleiadians were a “reptilian” species. Incidental information this may be, but to me the news is as Earth shattering as it is demure. My much earlier confusion over Rosemary Klem’s surrogate Atlantis seabed setting encompassing the conceptualisation of a “utopian” Sephardic generation base now makes absolute sense. Be it she perhaps doesn’t realise the place never existed in the fully material sense, it may dramatically come into being for experiencers when Earth shifts to Tara (i.e. Holographic Universe One transitions into Holographic Universe Two and old reality turns into new reality).

Surprisingly evidence supporting real physical marine Pleiadians is not unknown (and thus means they don’t formally class as aliens). Filmed on numbers of occasions, their skeletons (significantly, the skull is “ridged” and fingers fused to make a flipper) are also occasionally found, most commonly washed up on beaches. Even so the Pleiadian energy field has always caused me the greatest angst. Only now do I understand why my impression of its menacing nature has persisted. Parried against popular propaganda (origins possibly from channelled Sephardic sentiment), Pleiadian nature expressed in terms of that which is close to the divine doesn’t configure at all. Corresponding body energy field calibrations better compare to Charles Hall’s zany “Tall Whites”. Never a subscriber to coincidence my thoughts burn over plausible connections between Pleiandians and Tall Whites. Fortuitously perhaps, my yet-to-be-published book “The Birth of Hu-Man-ity” theorises the Tall White is version three human, created less than 50,000 years ago.

Though I can’t say for certain as I know of no autopsies conducted or their results, I would place a very large bid on the prospect that Pleiadians either have a cerebral cortex or a sufficiently functioned “version” of something that can produce similar intellectual qualities.  Therefore, if that was so, the “missing link” engendered in the Adam and Eve tale is neither configured from “hu” nor “man”. Under such circumstances (vilifying highlighted Jewish superstition) it must refer to the Pleiadian connection. To add gravy to this formula, they would have been already part-way (humanly) compatible, courtesy of an enhanced reptilian status, In fact, I would go further to promote the idea that human is actually an adapted mer-man (hence our slightly webbed fingers) rather than a primary ape. Though it is important to add, other extra-terrestrial Pleiadians (presumably of different hybrid mixes) are known to be land dwellers (such as the Nordics?) and may be, consequentially, very different in nature. In conclusion, evidence of the human hereditary Sirian path is most likely courtesy of Pleiadian lineages. Specifically I identify them as version six in “The Birth of Hu-man-ity”.

Visual footage of active reptilians is much more limited, but stock is out there. The most celebrated film consists of several minutes’ inspection of a presumed deceased figure wrapped in some kind of “foil” preserving blanket. It is at least seven feet tall, according to the commentator who also claimed it had attempted to “accost him” and he had been forced to subdue it in “self-defence”. Myths describing occasional unannounced interactions with similarly imposing figures suggest smaller human is far stronger than reptile men. It is said they are “easy” to render unconscious. African tales also highlight their severe allergy to titanium metal. Tradition has it warriors’ donned suitably tipped spears in order to ward a successful eradication campaign on the southern continent over 15,000 years ago.

Returning to the celebrated video (incidentally shot sometime in the 1990’s); I wonder why a preserving blanket was used. It seems to me the only logical explanation would be that it was there to shield the body flesh for a planned autopsy. Did one take place and what was discovered? Assuming the corpse was inspected by career professionals; were too many similarities with the human anatomy found for comfort? Did they, to their horror, find the sex organs (in particular) were identical or almost identical to human? If that was the case, what are the implications? Does it mean they can engage in physical cross-species reproduction with humans? Was this to be true, it places a whole new avenue of consideration regards Jewish superstitions over the status of “man”.

Referring to the Adam and Eve saga once more, genetic materials (biological dust) “taken from Adam’s side (rib)” could have been either used to clone or hybridise another model. The text clarifies that in order to regulate procedures, “God” had to place Adam “into a trance” (i.e. or under anesthetisation). So if the Jewish view concerns a specifically “reptilian” crossbreed, then no obvious reference is made in the Adam and Eve story beyond possible suggestions embroiled in the “fruits of the orchard” (genetic traits) analogy. In fact, the “Fall from Grace” episode states that after “God” learned of the “snake’s” corruption he “did something” to reptiles to make the women dislike them from then on.

Why women in particular and how did the relationship fare prior to this dramatic [genetic] alteration?

This is an important question as, currently, mirroring evasive Sasquatch, there are no DNA benchmark references available for scrutiny, or, better, none have been publicised. Is the reason for this tinged with conspiracy? Might erstwhile phantom findings, if released, categorically disprove politically favourable conjecture concerning spurious connections between man, ape, human and reptilian? Perhaps these, in part, would ridicule current rigid key genetics principles. I need to stress that, in its use here, the term reptilian does not demark earth surface reptile genetics or their embodied character traits. In fact, if the truth be known, Sephardic humanoids are ostensibly cold blooded mammals that possess a dual (hot/cold) pulmonary system (fused in humans). As with our deep sea squids, they can activate either system at will, but prefer cold blood status because it makes them more “rational”. Perhaps the terms “in a spurt of hot blood” or “it made my blood boil” in their suggestion of over calculated passions when used gives some credence to this as a consideration.

The way that the human brain functions ensures characters of men and women branch differently. In light of this, I would like to pose the unobvious question; could “reptilians” of all genders be more closely aligned to the human female than the male? Perhaps some answers might be gleaned from “tangents” here. We’ll see. First I note, and though they are rather similar looking to us in some ways, generally speaking, marine Pleiadian men appear essentially ugly when compared against the symmetrical beauty of their females. Mermaids found their way into old sea shanties. Why no mention of the men? Next, I posit that emotional human women are tuned much closer to the reptilian [black light] spectrum than logically lateral [spiritual white light] men. In addition, Sephardic reptilians strut like ostriches and our women are sometimes endearingly called “birds”, “chicks” because of a more quirky (avian-like) gait than men (other than Latino chicos perhaps?).

When the Sephardim were originally created, one of the key DNA asset holders were the Lyrans (lions). Is this possibly why, partnered with those avian similes, our women regularly attract feline nicknames, such as vixen, cat, tigress and so on? Interestingly Simon Parkes (who is married to a Lyran) once profoundly stated on camera (AMACH interview) that his (Sephardic) hosts told him the creature with the closest similarity to them (on Earth) is the household cat. Does this account for the considerable number of surviving topical ancient Babylonian statuettes and corresponding pharmkaxia (sorcery – witch’s cat) tradition? It doesn’t take a wild imagination to visualise what breeds of tyranny Pharaoh Akhenaten faced.

Beneath the veil that confounds Babylonian tradition is another sensationally enigmatic figurine which is commonly used as prop to illustrate deep historic reptilian “conspiracies”. Theorists have yet to contemplate the significance of the item correctly in isolation though. Made from useful quartz rock, the depiction of “reptilian woman with baby” formally substitutes as a lamp. With correct technological knowledge, an electric field can be generated through the rock which causes it to profusely illuminate. Though complimenting effects are as beautiful as they are efficient, that is not the point I am trying to make here. Beyond clearly raising mother and child to “angelic status” (by the light transformation), why did the Babylonians model this objet d’art on such an unusually serpentine theme?

Perhaps it was a “joke”? Did the Babylonians ever favour the surreal? In answer to these questions, they certainly upheld a tradition of accountability which meant specific attributes were sometimes presented as “spiritual metaphors”. I cannot personally fathom the poignant specific symbolism of reptilian humanoid holding baby as it makes no obvious contextual spiritual sense to me. This considered, there are two prominent oddities. Firstly, the statue is an unmistakable fusion of reptile and human woman perhaps some might say in same the way “Marvel Comics” could have envisaged subject matter. In that respect it is the only Babylonian icon of its kind to my knowledge. The next point is a crucial one. The baby is suckling. I have no intimate understanding of reptilian birthing culture, but the way the (rather disproportional) infant is held and method used seems identically human?

Therefore, it seems to me, that the statue stands out more as an experiment with surrealism if it is to be evaluated in purely symbolic terms. Taking into account that this would have been a mesmerizingly beautiful feature lamp in full operation (though the illustrated photograph may be of a cheap copy); might not the figurine most logically attest celebration of a very special event? If it is “surreal” it is one of a kind that arrogantly defies contemporary artistic culture.  Even so having no details on reflective politics that might credibly place thematic content puts me in an academically ambiguous position. My only option is to attribute pragmatic guesswork that promotes valid considerations so stable in resolve, reconstruction will forge a watertight case with sufficient spectral basis as to prelude the full decoding of this enigma.

The figurine itself might best class as a possible clue, but, when you have no more than that, well, a glimmer must be embraced as your plausible route to salvation

There is something recognisable about the structure of the woman’s face. To me features look remarkably Hassidic. Perhaps that is a coincidence, but these inconsistencies all add up when attributing the “big picture”. Given the eye catching suckling act, could the reptilian woman have been holding a human baby? Was that the significance (in the sense of specialness) of the artistic portrayal? If it was a human baby, why was it being held by the reptilian woman? Was she the mother? Alternatively, the statue maker could have been making the wide statement “reptilians are just like us”. I find the prospect of this as the summary effort towards a “thousands of years old anti-Racism campaign” hard to believe, particularly as (to my knowledge) there is no supporting written legacy. Besides, in my opinion that message is far too insignificant for an iconic lamp of great beauty – an heirloom for prosperity. Unless she was a perverse nanny or some kind of domestic help, clearly it was her child, or why would she be suckling it? If that was so then, once again, it would hardly validate the role as centrepiece for a timeless spiritual masterwork.

Assuming the reptilian woman was a real life figure, I would imagine that she was regarded as sufficient important to have been featured, in fact I think she is no ordinary reptilian woman though memory of her would have been very much localised to the period when she existed. Factoring in the baby’s expected (though unusual) human status points the niggling finger at the father, who, one would guess was of equal or greater social status than the woman herself. Her husband would assuredly present a huge clue as to reasons behind the celebration embroiled in the enigmatic figurine. Could this individual have been a Babylonian monarch? It would place a good circumstantial theory that their offspring were the original “chosen people”? Perhaps the suckling baby was the first blood Jew. Is that why primal Jews called themselves “Sephardim”; in homage of royal reptilian traits?

Maybe this is true, but there is a monstrous nagging consideration impeding the philosophy. I have witnessed a strange white dragon that carries what looks like a greying toupee uneasily perched on top of its head. Never have I identified a reptilian with cranial or facial hair other than a rather wispy snake mannered entity whose unruly straight locks are invariably accompanied by a broad coat hanger moustache. Was not Samson’s power in his hair? Of the numerous reptilian types, a humanised T-Rex miniature in brown flying suit approached my third eye one time. It was unmistakably hairless. Large salamander headed Draco surveillance men have none either.

Indeed, most of the furred creatures in their ranks seem to stem from enhanced Pteroid. At one time, in conjunction with my exo-political tuition, I was shown hundreds beyond hundreds of widely differing dog-faced “humans”. Strangely, many seemed vaguely recognisable. A similar catalogue exists for the lizards. Reptilian women, I stress, will sometimes wear an equivalent of the Islamic burqa or a light chiffon veil which seems to somehow unnaturally float above the head without aid. Causal effects bring out facial features, permitting profiles to beam. Why on Earth do orthodox Jewish women wear wigs? Was this an overhang from the royal reptilian brides’ public disguise? It is said the reason Mohamed’s wives chose the burqa as attire was to make a “fashion statement”. I find that explanation and the accompanying legacy banal to the point of disbelief.

Too many contradictions and no definite answers yet, but that should give sufficient ponderable “food for thought”. There is one other viable consideration not evaluated thus far. Dozens and dozens of generations past, if the pure blood ancestors were indeed a more substantial part reptilian than normal humans, they would have likely been bestowed with special powers making them standout when compared against the other. Does not biblical Genesis state “the sons of Gods became heroes of men”? Were those related Gods reptilian Sephardim? As for explaining the hair paradox, perhaps unused to such genetic features, the mother of the original child (in our statue) personally revered the trait as a miracle and that tradition stuck. Perhaps prior to conception she felt her genes were so divine, the male would have no reproductive effect. Hassidic Jews, it must be said, do seem to come with inbuilt superiority complexes.

Next step would be to determine how we can assign character/behavioural differences that distinguish Sephardic qualities from Sirian ones. Then there is the lingering issue of the missing link.  Pleiadians seem the most likely suspect here; but they also need to be evaluated in separate terms (i.e. how do they bring the “reptilian” and the “Sirian” out as combined personalities?) for clarity of vision. Before I undertake that arduous task, it is important to substantiate whether a human being could be [sexually] attracted to a reptilian and if there is sufficient genetic compatibility to enable physical procreation. One only has to tentatively refer to “Shakespeare’s” Macbeth to form a very dim view of the “great beauty” scenario. In fact legends present “witches” as hideous as they are wicked, menacingly cackling in dank caves. Renowned for brewing “Pharmkaxia” (remember the earlier “cat” connection) potions in large black cauldrons, apparently preparing omens of the most devastating detractions, they were also able to magically transport themselves to unknown twilight destinations simply propped on household brooms (though this is as popularised, they actually each used a type of staff on the lines of biblical Moses’ celebrated model. Aladdin’s magic carpet is an intriguing variant).

Contradicting this account, I regularly read (current and historic) memoirs (sometimes providing sordid details) of human encounters with presumably “other dimensional” reptilian women and these illustrate very different profiles. Reptilian women in question are invariably noted for their transfixing charisma. To elaborate, accounts detail vivid experiences presented “in the flesh” (as it were), figures are habitually shown as magnetically attractive, supremely elegant in posture exposing the general epitome of grace. I can personally confirm a reptilian’s “waggle” would put any human woman to shame. They have an athleticism combining with aesthetic energy which tantalises an enormous surrogate power.

Far from merely left to the imagination, their acrobats can jump higher than houses without assistance

If there was anything specific I could single out as truly remarkable, it is probably the eyes. Upon first impression, they dazzle. To compare with average human, ours are dull glints matched against their melting pools. Their eyes transport them beyond any casual human beauty. This is a feature in Pleiadians too whose are relatively larger and, again, more striking than humans.  Thus, in response to my initial query on the question of attraction, I could well imagine a human king being transfixed by his reptilian female counterpart. The “genetic compatibility” factor may be harder to address. However, if we (humans) are extensively reptilian (i.e. playing on the notion that ape is a version of reptilian), I can see no reason why there would not be reproductive synergy. Perhaps the truth will emerge if science comes clean on their research of things that don’t formally exist.

Victorian era British-Jewish politician Benjamin Disraeli is attributed to have confirmed prolific Hassidic marriages into the European aristocracies. Perhaps love did factor on occasions, but I feel sure most were primarily a “means to an end”. Superficial evidence this may be, but does it provide insight as to the comparable political objectives of ancient Babylonian royal marriages? Philosophising over the clinical efficiency with which the Jews managed to infiltrate European aristocracies suggests any in place reptilian alliances with Babylonian royalty would have been just as fecund. There is another possibility.

Going further back in time, long prior to the Babylonian civilisations, were all humans intercepted by reptilians to cause genetic exchanges before the notion of leadership and monarchy came into being? Second or third generations of the original hybrids would have meant there was a very small (perhaps under a hundred individuals) contingent to manage. If this is so, living humans today would be the genetic consequence. Expanding considerations, perhaps the greater mystery is why reptilian/human partnerships haven’t stood the test of time if humanity is the legacy. Continuing this line of thinking; how would a human without direct-input “reptilian” genetics function? If the matriarchal reptilian-human is a universal product (I am impressed with the work Nikolay Levashov did on reproductive placement of chromosomes here), it would certainly explain universally distinctive character differences specifically coming out in female offspring.

To clearly sort out unmistakably human “virtues”, we need a straightforward method to distinguish Sirian qualities from reptilian ones in man. I have already discussed female mannerisms, feminine features and unique balances of judgement that separate men from women. The Gnostics used the word light to symbolise logic (or logos). Soulful emotional qualities herald from darkness and these are harboured by the quantum layer (outlined at length in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”). From a theoretical police line-up, Sirians could be very quickly and simply separated out from reptilians. The former have no social law and order, whereas the latter is obsessed in perfecting systemic infrastructure.

This is not to say Sirians are without arbitrary bodies to impose judgement on social offenders or reptilians are incapable of bucking the system. Quite the reverse is so as modern day Earth’s “Prison Planet” concept is loosely modelled on utopian Atlantis civilisation. Sirians assumed roles as royal luminaries at Atlantis, acting as the keepers of the records and fraternal judges. Considering this, remarkably, when compared to reptilians, they are not notably ethical. Indeed it could be argued ethics were alien to rule breaking Sirians. Their wider renown was for integrity and scruples that were beyond reproach. To highlight the major incompatibility; without numerous, very carefully defined strong laws to guide them, those affiliated with the Sephardim simply could not or cannot be trusted. Paradoxically, human can either follow or break regulations, depending on mood!

I mentioned Charles Hall’s “Tall Whites” in a similar context earlier. To elaborate, at a past Sydney talk of his I attended he made a number of suggestions that gave credence to the notion a link exists between them and the reptilian “Draco” hierarchy. Distinctively a short silver multi-purpose “laser pen” (that almost killed Hall) carried by them is a “standard issue” accoutrement for affiliates of an extra-dimensional cosmic police force. More importantly, expanding thoughts on how the general reptilian philosophy over ethics differs from ours, Hall mentioned his “visitors” would never trespass into a “forbidden zone” even if their lives depended on it. Herpetological insignia has been widely promoted. Memorable Draconian motifs include stylised serpents, double eagles, fleur de lys and many other faunas (in particular). Though areas generally off-limits are invariably cordoned behind indistinct barriers (sometimes invisible), they are always marked with brand logos in some way. To a human “off limits” screams too intriguing not to investigate of course. Even with the strictest warnings (sincerely outlining dangers of trespass) someone out there is always reckless enough to attempt to break in to uncover secrets.

Reptilians are very pedantic social beings. Microcosmic circles of trust dictate the interconnecting function and purpose of communities. By comparison Sirians are loyal “loners” (possibly explaining the aloofness of Pteroid). Reptilians are opportunistic manipulators. Sirians will stand by their beliefs ‘til death. Reptilians can be cautiously humble when on the losing end of a dispute. When not violently “seeing red”, they also have an extraordinary capacity for patience in aggravated circumstances. This comes out as fight or flight psychology in man (ironically something clinically blamed on the reptilian brain). Subtly similar, Sirians will act first and think about the consequences afterwards in crisis situations. Simply put, they would tend to make snap critical decisions, whereas we and the reptilians are more inclined to pontificate and procrastinate than remedy flaws, however gaping.

In some ways unsurprisingly, the clear boundary that best allocates reptilians from Sirians is the functional central nervous system (or brain). Ultimately delineated relative approaches to life can be boiled down to the application of conscience versus compassion. “Oddity” human is a collaboration of the two, although those of us that demonstrate dishonourable loyalty err towards the reptilian side. Impartial honour indicates strong Sirian traits. This would explain why that for societies without conscience, laws are absolutely vital in defining civilisation’s cooperative needs. Logic driven beings would find similar laws either patronising or insulting. Reptilians (as with humans) are part Lyran. Inherited Lyran fabled storytelling prowess may be the fuel that ignites ever present fires exploding as political melodramas in our societies. For instance, this is significantly why I believe propagandas exist. Stories bereft of truth had no place in Sirian communities. Their information was impeccable. That which did not desire political focus simply wasn’t recorded (a criticism levelled at the ancient Babylonians suggesting civilisations were either extensions of or modelled on Atlantis?).

There is another prominent difference between the Sirian and reptilian relative approaches to living which menacingly reflect in human. Sirians wallowed in fundamentalism. By comparison, possessing no capacity to be faithful, reptilians were egregious idealists (although their over-zealous observance of laws can also be a form of fundamentalism). Considering the evolution of the interpretive twisting of values that support our common word “love” serves purpose to demonstrate this catalyst well. Gnostics tried to persuade their listeners that love was a humbling before divinity and, therefore, to exude purposefully neither required idyllic settings nor reciprocation from those in vision. Under these auspices, the Gnostics directed love indiscriminately, regardless of whether efforts were welcomed or unappreciated by affected individuals. Per crude conceptual rehashing of Sirian “laws of attraction”, true love now has been bastardised into a crass symptom of passion (compassion is the derivative). This, above all other things, highlights the scurrilous reptilian nature of man.

Idealism and fundamentalism successfully came together under Pleiadian administration (in that capacity leveraging the Tamarian). They did manage to perfectly harmonise laws of attraction. However, was a like model ever to be adopted by humanity, it would generally mean intolerable repression for the masses, who would be devoid of opportunity for personal sovereignty and absent of any prospect of honest liberty. In a sense the Tamaras (“Ra” as the ultimate authority over sun cycle) is the human model. Under very different circumstances the main reason Sirians and reptilians were able to forge ahead with their joint venture cooperative technology city (currently buried under mountains of polar ice, remnants of an ancient moon the Vedas name Falla) was they shared the same ultimate civilisation goal.

Though each approached harmony (i.e. “peace”) by different means, the end always justified the journey. Intriguingly, Pleiadians religiously coveted tyrannies of happiness to effectively model their infamous communities. Accoutrements of their success on Earth remain today. So-called “Greek” relics and other structures now under oceans provided technologies that aided collective communion. Communion (“popular destiny”) is the only way to aggregate beliefs into some sort of workable group proliferation. Historically glorification of Ba’al is the best active example. Though terms may have changed, originally “Ba” stood for praise (in the sense of worship) and “Al” meant God (or Lord or master). Al-Lah compares as great or almighty God in the Atlantis version. Jewish “El” is a sloppily pronounced diphthong. Communal group channelled energy to cause deification of idols. Here fevered populism recalcitrantly locked horns with religious doctrine in the beatification of Ba’al and the establishment had to put an end to the crisis.

Differences between Sirians and reptilians are marked. The former is celebrated for original thought which apparently fuels genius qualities (something I am routinely accused of), whereas the Sephardim extend template driven replications to the limit. If it exists they can copy it. If it doesn’t exist they can fabricate a holographic simulation. Sirians remained generally distant of Atlantis societies. Tending to manifest at moments of importance or tragedy, they were perhaps regarded as something like mystic priests (when rarely observed), normally clad in plain robes and sandals (Viracochas of Mayan legends?). This is likely more evidence of the Anunaki surrogacy. Babylonian tales concur with moralist clerics addressing particular venom towards intoxication. I wonder if Jesus is an archetypal mystic hermit. The evolution of Christianity developed radical philosophies supporting communism (a derivative of communion) by the mid nineteenth century. Damning ambitions of those attached to establishment (ancestors of clerics that forbid “populist empowerment” worship of Ba’al) control agendas is why the “deflecting” socialism ruse has been gradually implemented and will become the universal tool for herding populations.

After the fall of Atlantis when most of the Sirians had evacuated Earth, reptilians gradually replaced the vacuum with their own brands of reclusive monk sects. Unfortunately the Sirians would have rebuked some of their abhorrent common practices with feverish ardour. Reptilians resonate with traditions, like to build institutions, value marked social roles and other identifiers. For instance insistence on “pink for girls” “blue for boys” typically sounds like one of their customs. Religion to them is nothing more than a tool that might be used to “socialise” human beings beneath their cultural banner. They have a great belief in the rite of passage, so tend not to indoctrinate their own young. However if there was the desire, implementation would be managed via some kind of religious methodology. That aside, humanity has significantly and effectively grown to abridge both Sirian and reptilian worlds, therefore (considering Sephardic reliance on the “Ra pact” foundation for engineered false reality)…

What impact does this have on the objectives of Anunaki hierarchies?

Factoring hereditary progeny, why did the Sirian-Anunaki surrogacy go so horribly wrong? Why was “teething” newly created human whisked off Earth just in the nick of time? Did that Sirian infiltration actually ignite the giant cosmic war of 120,000-102,000BC (guestimate figures)? Was the great flood event (circa 35,000BC) aimed at human or Neanderthal? There are other questions that need to be addressed after I re-evaluate who/what the Anunaki (group) are and, from that appraisal, draw whatever synopses are possible regards character and purpose. The title of this essay might well appear to be an odd choice given content thus far, as neither Saturn nor “influential time-lords” have actually been mentioned. Contextual relevance is about to become starkly apparent.

“Influential time-lords”, for instance, is a euphemistic reference to the Anunaki of course, but I first would like to tackle “Saturn” before I explain why. There is another connection with the Anunaki here, but it is more subtle and generally unknown. Characteristics of “Gods” supposedly worshiped by the ancients are common knowledge and much pertinent information is available for public scrutiny. Those that bother to seek will find consistency in accounts. All the established chronicles illustrate that a “lead” God either covets meteorology or the “air”. For instance Celtic deity Beelzebub presided over heavenly weather systems. Greek affairs below Zeus (Lord of the heavens) were rather more complex, but they do implicate the “theo” legacy. Akhenaton’s prime deity Amon is master of the air and everything unseen.

“Influential time-lords” relevance now palatably understood; let me introduce a different side of Saturn. I am reluctant to refer to the American agency NASA for “basis” as it produces bucket loads of deceptively malignant propagandas in support of the government’s populist brainwashing agenda. However, details released about Saturn’s satellite view firmament are so strikingly accurate they deserve tribute. The famous rings may arguably be composed of water (isn’t this a sign of life?), ice, rocks and dust, but they (and I quote) also have a “remarkable effect on weather systems”. Thinking of possibilities (considering that Saturn is not the only ringed “gas planet”), if I wanted to create a cosmic calling card (if you will) that identified with the Ouroboros, well, I don’t imagine I could do better than Saturn.

Continuing this line of thought whilst erring on the side of the positive, of all the places in the cluttered cosmos, Saturn seems an ideal location for a God of Meteorology. Weather systems are only “arbitrary” because scientists theorise this is so. The same scientists theorise an obviously designed universe is evidence of “randomness”, so I tend to take what they assert with “big pinches of salt. Anyway, I can’t say for certain, but I would hazard a massively plausible calculation that Saturn acts as stronghold host to the Anunaki. Sit tight, because there’s more. If we can authoritatively rely on this presumption, logic becomes fascinating.

Before I resolve how everything “connects up”, here is a little more historic background. According to Babylonian myths the Anunaki left Earth in a huff immediately after trying to wipe out “constantly chattering” man with a giant flood. Slavic folklore that possibly “fits” may refer to an event that is believed to have created the Russian Black Sea. Another is an extraordinary weather incident that apparently opened a new water way which covered (what now is) Northern Africa and sections of the Middle East. Unfortunately existent physical evidence could only be classed as “circumstantial” today (notwithstanding the Sphinx’s mysterious “water erosion”) mainly because waters rapidly subsided over few centuries to leave vegetative marshlands in their wake. A lush, wet paradise region persisted for an excessive period afterwards.

Was this the hubris of Eden?

Personally, I favour the latter (North African flood) event reflects the Anunaki outburst as remarkably large Neanderthals were located there at the time. Dates I have mentioned before (circa 35,000BC) and shortly after the dramatic exit, Atlantis Sirians “returned” with human clans in tow from Mars to settle in paradise. Was this the original Promised Land or “Eden” (Aden is a modern day country of that region)? It would have been located in the heart of today’s Middle East, perhaps Israel even! My inadvertent mention of an inner Earth Eden in prior articles suggests a contradiction here. Though it does appear so on face value, I can now confirm more than one (perhaps each pronounced slightly differently) Eden or Edin location. The identifiers of the Promised Land could well have used Eden as its namesake, particularly if name usage was generally synonymous with paradise.

Potentially referring to the Anunaki, I am constantly perplexed by those “dark” Earth energy fields exposed in Zoroastrian philosophies. This reflectively lends me to favour that religious doctrine is much more ancient than postulated through conventional historic analysis. Tainted evil territory would surely refer to promiscuous effects of the Anunaki as the most probable candidate. If this is so then origins of Zoroastrianism seem destined to predate 35,000BC as that is when the Anunaki “vacated Earth” according to folklore. The problem is very few (if any) humans existed on Earth prior (evidenced by the lack of skeletal remains?) as most would have returned with the Martian Sirians after the Anunaki exodus. In which case, the underlying purpose behind Zoroastrian instruction remains a perplexing mystery. Could, by chance, have chroniclers been light on information and failed to observe precise terms of the Anunaki exit? If there had been a transitional ascension instead then plausibility might allow the placement of a much later date on affairs that vilify Zoroastrian traditions. Has Anunaki influence over man merely been minimised since 35,000BC?

Parried against the Almighty, Anunaki are very minor Gods. Accordingly the Saturn spectacle is only visibly ever-present for residents of the local star system. That presence coordinates weather which goes some way towards demonstrating they are the precise same Gods the ancients chronicled. Additionally, in Robert Morning Sky’s “Terra Papers”, extra-terrestrial visitor Bek-ti informs us that the fundamental functional purpose of a God is “to be worshiped” which would cordially correspond with the need to be spectacular. At some point the Anunaki clearly saw benefit in colonising other planets and this would have prepared their move to Earth. Formally (according to again circumstantial ancient sources) they initially operated in partnership with Sirians.

I place a “best guess” chronological figure of this liaison around 500,000 years ago (admittedly summarily inspired somewhat by Gilgamesh’s epic), but I could be way off the mark here (given that numbers of stone tablets detailing the famous “Kings’ List” are possibly permanently “lost’). Genetic compatibility may have been correct, but it did not promote successful surrogacy. In fact the heavenly conceptual alliance morphed into a practical fiasco. Morally biased Sirians simply would not go through with aspects of the role that fell short of their approval. Unfortunately, the list of detractors was so long many key ambitions of the Anunaki were simply ignored. This left them between a proverbial rock and a hard place, quite literally stranded without bodies, though spurious later arrangements with the Draco (implied in the capture of Inanna [Venus] saga) possibly remedied failings of the Sirians – something I will reflect on towards the conclusion of this essay.

It certainly seems most probable that Anunaki visitation and attempted rule over Earth replicated efforts on Saturn. Saturn sounds a lot like “Satan”. So much so, some posit that Saturn is in fact a mispronunciation of Satan (also incidentally known as the Blessed Star). I have gone to some length to expose the errors defining gross misinformation that distorts the iconic star’s reputation in other writings. Summarily, the problem is this. There were two separate, very different scenarios that have been confused for one another over time. The Satan star worked to distribute white light which eventually formed seven “heavenly” dimensions. Overwhelming pressure from “left behind” extraneous matter (subsequently composing two black dimensions) that was initially “blocked” by Satan but ended up building to such an extent; it collapsed the virtuous star (i.e. this event is colloquially known as “the fall”, something science  routinely refers to as a “black hole” occurrence).

Hardly denoting the transcription of all evil (unless “evil” here is a cover for goodness), Sat-an in Sanskrit literally means “Almighty God above truthful purity”. Quite the reverse is so, I think, therefore here’s my suggestion. Could a very different Satan have been the poor pronunciation of Saturn? Did, over time, the negative connotations of both terms become so indistinguishably engrained they effectively “fused” as one?

In the modern age of rationalism, the importance of mood is largely overlooked. Though I question whether they truly parry with each of the heavenly dimensions, Gnostics attempted to describe Almighty God in terms of fundamental states, such as “grace” and “nobility”. This is not evidence of cultural insanity. Rather, embroiled philosophies are so seriously objective; they are very hard to understand by those trapped under spell of rationalism. For example, in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, I describe how certain atomic formations might influence an object (e.g. take the stigma attached to a mountain range such as Dylatov Pass) to such a degree it exudes “character” in the form of positive or negative vibes (professionally exploited by Hammer Horror movies, I would emphatically imagine).

Suffice to say, there is much that humanity doesn’t (or refuses to) comprehend regards the meta-functional purpose of existence. Could the Anunaki, in situ on Earth, have unwittingly caused such memorable turmoil for us then that prophet Zoroaster felt obliged to warn his brethren? Under Sirian surrogacy, one would have imagined the Anunaki’s great priority would have been to place Saturn in popular focus in order to ramp up committed worshiper conversion rates. There’s no point in putting mesmerising rings on Saturn for no one to witnesses them. Slavic-Thracian etymology conclusively conceptualises Yahweh as a grim reaper figure. Regularly occasioned in biblical folklore, was usage “consistent” and does it always refer to the same basic entity (such as the Anunaki)?

Human, tradition infers, was genetically unauthorised (because we possessed mindsymbolised as knowledge). This angered Yahweh who wrathfully banished us from the Garden of Eden. Did (in this instance) Yahweh association with “the Anunaki” imply the “Garden of Eden” is the whole ofconfigurative Earth”? Human’s mind capacitor (knowledge generation the side effect) is the cerebral cortex and this is a definite Sirian asset. That could have led to a cosmic war generated by parties that saw human evolution as a potentially devastating existential threat. It would also explain why the Sirians stepped in to save humanity. Factoring in their passion for freedom and unrequited truth; it seems to me that perhaps Anunaki objectives would be regarded as far from “fair” when pitched against those lofty standards. For instances, had they have chosen to apply cunning in place of logic to cultivate order in the form of political “wins”, decorum impresses me that the Sirians could under no circumstance have supported their desired existence.

Humans admire trustworthiness even if we (as individuals) ourselves are not very trustworthy. Because clever authoritarian institutions cast the impression that laws provide “freedom” (or freedoms – I never did appreciate the plural use of that word), people accept indirect tyranny because it is not “in the face”. Perhaps Anunaki determination to proliferate their unrequited “needs” also turned out to be dramatically unyielding, causing conflicts with personal interests of infinitely inferior human being. Regardless of “gains” from the connection, such as inexplicably heightened individual power, perhaps that overt oppression fostered extremely negative sentiment against the Gods. Is that the basis for the “evil Satan” (aka Saturn) confusion that haunts today’s ever willingly gullible populaces? As an aside, it would be good to know how much Sephardic malpractice has backed off that tradition.

Reporting on one of her many publicised conversations with a red dragon, Eva Draconis once presented a vital off-the-cuff remark which stated (to the effect) that all (bar none) of the pope’s cardinals are Draco “assets”. Clearly the Sephardim have an imperious agenda too and this is currently being administered by the Catholics (via the United Nations, whose manifesto exudes hybridised Theosophical philology) under terms of Zionism (aka “globalism”). In this context, impending human ascension (I have discussed many times before) is at centre stage. Probably the most important question in review of the transition (if it happens) concerns power sharing arrangements that, due to expanded corresponding dimensional bandwidth, would permit Anunaki direct involvement in human affairs again. How will their style of demagogue despotism conflict against maintained reptilian tyranny? Interestingly, Babylonian annuls record various royal marriages between Draco queens (possibly Antrutinram, Tressuntbaa and Tamutakbu) and the Anunaki.

What are the implications?

Ignoring the plausible consequence of a reoccurrence of all-but-forgotten satanic (Saturn) cultural programming by the Anunaki, does this suggest any new role for the Sephardim will merely act as corrupt backstop to enable their grand destiny plans? The conduit was opened through Ba’al before. There is another rather more disconcerting potential symptom from this that deserves explicit configuration. From the Anunaki perspective, was humanity deliberately created as a way to bridge Sirian and reptilian nature as a “complete” entity in order to calculate a more compatible future host? Time-lords see past present and future simultaneously. This ironically places an even bigger question mark as to which angry God “Yahweh” really represents. Before the Sirians separated from the Anunaki, they were an equal part of the divine serpent (existentially, the human kundalini is lowest manifestation of the caduceus [Moses’ staff?] and that is why Sephardic “Ciakars” connect via chakra points). The forlorn attempt to rekindle original status failed because possessed Sirians lacked desired reptilian qualities. Here’s why I said “ironically” before. Could “angry Yahweh” symbolically represent “Sirian” but only in relation to the aspect creation of human? (I.e. God here simultaneously banished and rescued mankind)

Reptilian qualities would be essential to permit limited corruption under “reasonable circumstances”. In this context, human would make a much more “balanced” reptilian/Sirian hybrid (per outlined Anunaki goals). We have values but are sometimes equally corrupt in the way we apply them. Vitally, from the genetic engineering perspective, our magnificent cerebral cortex would surely class as the living piece de resistence of materialism. Proportionally Sephardic, all humans are also tainted with alien (Lyran and possibly others) DNA. If ancient Babylonian texts are accurate, was the reason for Anunaki marriage into Draco ranks primarily motivated by potential remedies for genetic unity complications? The Anunaki could not have been certain that extraneous alien content wouldn’t disaffect future surrogacy plans without initially testing compliance. Prior, they presumed related Sirian compounds would work and paid heavily for the complacency.

I discussed Ra occultism at some length last article which included the proposition that the Anunaki currently govern our sun by proxy. Additionally, in confirmation of the “Inanna” (Venus) underworld myth, cosmic sources have validated knowledge that they presided over an experiment to convert populations that live in the heart of Venus. Though I am not aware of any publication, the main purpose behind Venusian Valiant Thor’s hapless attempts at brokering arrangements with the United States government in the 1950’s coincided with an Earth comparative breakdown of social order at his home planet. There is some kind of very strange life system inside Mercury and this may well be an Anunaki project too.

The point I am trying make here is their manifest ranges should be regarded as “cosmic forces” rather than anything that might be remotely compared to tangibly “bodied individuals” (even configured as the many forms of Ba’al). Indeed, the Vedic cobra with a thousand heads metaphor indicates the Anunaki might simultaneously occupy legions of people if that was their objective desire. Some entities swallow up entire planets for breakfast, such is their range.  Nevertheless, occupation of a star is a whole different facilitation category. My book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” emphasises all planets are encased stars. There is a world of disparity between “closed” planets and “open” physical stars. Physical stars are expressively multi-functional gateways. One function is to preside over times (time, generally misunderstood by conventional science, is a cosmic “script” that “hovers” in a standalone dimension providing the basis for everything that exists or doesn’t exist via atomic “calibrations” or astral projections). Consequentially, any cosmic force that assumes star governance status is a time-lord as well.

Here’s the danger. Should they choose to do so; time-lords can repackage existence in such a way that it alters the cosmic flow of chronology. Only those situated in “impartial containment” might discern changes (with consistent time). For the experiencer, for the barely conscious human, time is nothing more than a reflective effect of perception. Perception, attached to this environment, supersedes all other considerations. Whereas it might possible (for human) to stand back from perception, so few seem to have the latent ability it is pointless for me to dwell on the consequence. Instead, I must bitterly conclude that humans (unmovably reliant on illusory reality) are physically unable to decipher time shifts (beyond spectacularly illogical ones that defy anticipated continuity).

That, thus far, ends my quest. Nevertheless, (I feel) If this essay is to be remembered as enigmatic writing, it would be good to finish things off with a few “poignant” unanswered queries to keep my audience keen. Readers choosing to volunteer active roles in the discovery tour are cordially welcome provide interesting (but please, nothing crass) feedback in the comments section too. So, without further ado, I’ll start the ball rolling with three unresolved topics (that perhaps one day will kick off separate future research projects).

If the Anunaki are able to alter chronologies of any timeline attached to their cosmic stream, how might this impact humanity when we ascend into a dimensional frequency compatible with their bandwidth?

The next part is rather more challenging. It concerns the complexly unenviable position of the Sephardim in relation to our ascension. How will the transition affect them? To note, perhaps the ascension is the most compelling reason for their ongoing visceral attempts to halt human DNA progression, including establishing numerous resonating “so-called” frequency fences (via the false matrix) and their commissioning of the dramatically disastrous Philadelphia Experiment. I have highlighted details of this operation before. In brief, Zeta hybrids were commandeered as “brains” in an attempt to disconnect Earth from the sun’s direct magnetic field. If it had worked the sun would no longer be “visible”. Instead, ramped up moon generated sunlight (recalibrated to exact Draco specifications) would have “looped” with Earth causing mankind to be totally under the spell of the Sephardim. Does this highlight their reticence to “trust” infinitely superior time-lords?

Advertisements

A Long History of Man

Standard
A Long History of Man

I now proudly and humbly offer live light DNA reading consultations aimed at revealing aspects of anyone’s deep historic past. Sessions are usually conducted via Skype for those willing to sacrifice dignity, intellect and means. There are details on others’ experiences and instructions as to how to “connect” with me here. I provide additional case studies in this article too.

As “human being” is probably one of those better examples to demonstrate the paradox of converging genetic provenance, I have instinctively avoided tackling the convoluted heritage we choose to call “man”. If (for instance) deep origins stem from an Anunaki identity concept (intimated in various Sumerian ancient texts) that goes [way] beyond physical, then we must seriously reflect on the probability mankind heralds from darkness, which is everything chaotic or soulfully passionate. Yet how could the committed researcher possibly factor unemotionally logical Sirian (a definite component of human DNA as evidenced in the cerebral cortex) into the equation? When the Gnostics, the last bastion of civilised Atlantis order, celebrated anything and everything with light qualities, they knew that logos (or logic) is brilliance. To the keen minded ancient Roman Sol Invictus and Babylon’s Amon Re (Ra) sun worship “cults” propose very different spiritual interpretations than traditional historic accounts theorise. “Light qualities” include predispositions such as reason and conscience. These are a staple of Sirian character and there lays the giant paradox, as witnessed in hu-man.

Here I have deliberately hyphenated hu-man to marcate the importance of our divided but united opposing worlds. Neither name part gives any individual credit to the Sirian component of our critical DNA asset (adding to the complexity somewhat). In fact “Hu” pays homage to the Creator (genetic overlord), Hu Gadam. Worryingly, in excited form this Biblical God might equally as well compare to a blood-curdling snarling beast and that is why sincere analysis of the word “YHWH” presents so many issues when weighed against traditionalism. “YHWH”, in truth, ghosts many things in the Bible account (spanning from the degenerate beast to omnipresent “oneness”), so I do not wish to propagandise original intent.  Procrastination is the cancer of intellect. Tradition coins YHWH as the unpronounceable name of God because only those deemed the most holy were allowed to utter it in religious ceremonies. After the Romans swiftly ended the Siege of Jerusalem (69AD), the central Judaic authority splintered and religious traditions suffered. Authentic pronunciation of YHWH was one of the notable casualties, or so the myth makers imply.

The truth behind the unpronounceable name of God stretches back to the era of great Babylonian dynasties; back to a time when the world was very different and things that are hidden today were out in the open in plain sight. Contrary to deliberate timeless propaganda myths dressed as historic efficacy, Israelites stole everything they claim to have inherited, which included their precious name of God. Therefore the title YHWH is historically meaningless for they neither knew the true name of God nor could ever pronounce it phonetically. YHWH is a homophone code that suited the deceptive purposes of the imaginations (some argue it is a version of the Slavic God Xamolsis) of those behind Israelite religious tyranny. Anyone with presence of mind must draw the straightforward conclusion that it is impossible to pronounce the unpronounceable and that is why the Israelites are yet to find God. Personal experience has blessed me with insight beyond normal means allowing my witness of the correct term as used by Ciakars, but I cannot replicate it (physically). In my head it is possible to evaluate sound structures. For me this conclusively affirms YHWH has no phonetic relation to the correct term and categorically proves the Israelites never knew the real name of God (or, perhaps, its best approximation).

Many are selfishly lured into the belief that “man” is everything noble. However, it should be noted that if Hu truly represents the Godly Satyr expressed in our mammalian DNA, then “man” can only be evidence of a calculated serpentine heritage (personified by the beautiful snake metaphor in genesis of “Adam and Eve”). Dragons (the ultimate serpents) were master geneticists under instruction of Ba’al and these created the Satyr (detail explored shortly). Contrary to popular opinion making, mammals are certainly serpentine as confirmed by the lineage of Anunaki devolution.

Interestingly, it was only from the consequence of Ciakers (or snake-men) also being versions of Sirian that man has any conscience at all. In fact Ciakars pride themselves in their ability to tune out of their Sirian in order to fully activate (I will call it) emotional reserves. Our understanding of emotion is grossly over-simplified, so it is hard to represent Ciakar capability. Suffice to say (and generally speaking) many Ciakars try to avoid conscience where possible as it conflicts with raw compassion.  I, as recently as yesterday, have been privileged to experience what it is to be a Ciakar. It is unclear whether the experience was a grafted past life reoccurrence or their assisted holographic simulation. Going through the experience was very different to what I imagined it would be like. For instance, I preferred the “cold blood” state because I felt calm and collected; resolutely rational. The warm (or they like to call hot) blood experience was something akin to an altered state. I wasn’t drunk per se. It was more like a huge adrenaline infusion. That is the best way I can describe “hot blood” state.

The genuine researcher avidly seeks treasure in other views, constantly aware predetermination and prejudice may also cloud the greatest of minds. Consequentially, I have heard speculations on alternative websites that promote the idea some displaced peoples formally associated with the region we now call Israel refute their human status. They, according to reports, drop the “hu” in preference of “man”. Hu Gadam is vastly superior (genetically) than any Ciakar, as are all Pteroids. The Ciakars’ creation of human being was unauthorised and very well described in the Biblical “Fall From Grace. So who or what could be behind this sickly influence of the Jews (if true)? I shall attempt to explore the conundrum.

It is incorrectly presumed that identification with man is an expansion of superior spiritual status alluded to by that “chosen people” categorisation. Our current apathetic star-seeds driven “white light” spiritual movement is pretty much the single handed brain-child of the Draco (factious “unions” of Pteroids, Ciakars and others). In that capacity, most self-affirmed savants are actually unwitting agents of theirs. Dragons (far adrift of quaint mythical status) preside over all DNA equity managed by the Draco. Logically it would be fair to say that these unseen protectors own everything that moves on this planet. Nevertheless, as far as they are concerned the very first man on Earth (though it wasn’t called Earth by them) was Tyrannosaurus Rex. Ciakars are miniature versions and fossils of prehistoric “raptors” are probably what remain of their ancient culture.  Therefore, if the prior mentioned alternative websites’ claims about certain displaced Israelite nationals (goyim) have basis, then an affinity with reptilian and not Sirian kith is being persuaded (i.e. if ape equates to “hu”, then reptilian is “man”).

There is a significant character displacement between reptilian (man) and the Martian (we have no species word for Sirian). In absence of “conscience” the empathetic emotional bond is exaggerated out of all proportion. In this frame of mind, the reptilian has no issue with exploiting or duping the willing. Amusingly Israelite Talmudic religious “edict” adopts almost identical “double” standards (notably emphasised in the ethical accountability of the most unholy sacking of Jericho). Conversely, standing on principles is probably the best evidence of our Sirian potential. Surprisingly though, if anything there is greater spiritual symmetry between Martian community values and “order” dragon-style than between any other entity types I have evaluated.

Taking into consideration the Irish Celts are almost certainly break-away Israelites and evidence of an at least 3,000 years old primary exodus (i.e. Moses “gave chase” for Ireland, the Promised Land, but, ultimately, was either too lazy or too impeded to undertake the full journey), the religious “script” seems of greater artistic potence than a zealous offering of honest attention to genetic provenance. Even so ancient texts do verify Irish (pre-Israelite) settlers were regularly visited by extra-terrestrial travellers in Vimanas (spacecraft with inter-dimensional capacities) and one would imagine “certain” modern day Rabbis have considered the ramifications. There is also the fundamental question as to the reason why Teutonic tribes (Israelites) took so much umbrage at the Irish after forming their hallowed Union of Jacob (which is now known as the British Isles).

Were these tribes originally Russian Slavs (as popularised) or had they actually been residents of Judea? If the Irish had jealously left the remaining brethren behind all those years ago, then some sort of divine redemption would be understandable (given the cloaked reptilian mindset). Only God is capable of calculated vengeance so as much as “the powers” have tried to wall paper the situation, Ireland has and will remain displaced from their preordained “Union of Jacob” (the final collaboration of Isaac’s sons) eternally.

Though different earlier versions of [so-called] reptilians were (and are) littered throughout the immediate universe, Ciakars gestated our genetics in a way so as to follow their path; a journey that is only a few million years old thus far. Conversely, Sirian DNA heritage stretches back billions of years and this is what I want to focus on this article. Oddly perhaps, I only made the definite Sirian-Martian-Atlantis connection relatively recently. Putting truth aside, if, for instance, Sumerian myths are to be believed, the Anunaki shift from serpentine to proto-human form does go some way to endorse Zechariah Sitchin’s strange theories about Earth settlers in the order of 500,000 years ago. Long pre-Atlantis of course, the characters highlighted were of the same basic gene stock as the Atlanteans. These were clearly the closest approximations to the Anunaki in physical form and (in that way) Sitchin’s reasoning is flawless. However, many (including Sitchin) fail to comprehend that the Anunaki are too astral to materialise. In addition, our DNA does a lot more than our sciences configure. I regularly illuminate (check out my book) that the essence of genetic traits can only be seen in the quantum layer (or astral light). We, the human group, tune into a low bandwidth frequency (i.e. via our immaterial DNA).

The Anunaki are inconceivably more advanced beings than we could possibly comprehend. Our puny receptor bandwidth barely dignifies existential identity. We dare to consider comparisons against their exalted vastness? Also, has irrelevant human reflected over the certainly that the pristine, magnificent and awesome would never stoop to our putrid (their choice of word) level of existence? The Anunaki deliberately occupy higher realms which are disassociated from what we determine is and label “physical” (although, to be honest, all existences appear as physical to those with the ability to tune in to them). The subliminal connection is executed via our quantum layer (which, if we had unlimited bandwidth, would span all dimensions and all time). Correspondingly, it might be argued that every human today is a “bit” of the Anunaki, but coherent one on one communication with the “body executive” (shall I say) is impossible. (Try and communicate with any one of your individual red corpuscles and wait for the response). In fact there is only one way for the Anunaki to become physical (and stoop to our level) in the 3D realm. It is only possible for them to occupy readymade bodies or, to put it another way, they must find conduits we would usually define as surrogates. I believe that Sitchin misinterpreted evidence of one such “Borg” relationship (that perhaps predictably went pear shaped) half a million years ago and that is why the account of that distant past Earth “takeover” has become distorted.

Consideration of this (host) compatibility issue really intrigues me. Could the Anunaki simply “be” for the sake of being or is “being” more (or should I say less?) than that? It seems to me they (or “it”, because the Anunaki are fundamental variations of “one”) have needed very specific humanesque identities in order become their preferred choice of physicality billions of years ago. When they occupied the Altanteans’ forefathers it demonstrates just how important chi-suitability is. Working with this line of reasoning, if the Anunaki are permanently (contrary to popular myths) ever-present on Earth, would not all life forms need to correlate chi-suitability for their being ambitions to be complete?

Taking that resolve a little further, and though the evidence is a little superficial, I have failed to find any Anunaki (light DNA residual) traits either in the insect world or much of the animal kingdom here on Earth. The ancients reported the Anunaki partnered with the Draco after the Lyran Ciakars were forced inside Earth, but this is to be expected as serpentine heritage will never be entirely discarded (I finish this article with my own speculations on why a new light DNA bridge was engineered upon Ciakar isolation. Accordingly, was Inanna sacrificed to enable the genetic bridge to formulate?). So why is there any anomalous rift between the Draco and the Anunaki? Perhaps some questions are never meant to be responsibly answered as (I’m informed) interpretations impact deep political developments that stretch back to the dawn of time (an epic plausibly waiting to be deciphered?).

More intriguingly, the deeper query that ever beckons, in light of these wider considerations, is, was there an “original man” and, if so, what (on earth) did he constitute?

This correlates with earlier sentiment where I outline to the effect “the creators of the dinosaurs envisaged Tyrannosaurus Rex as their version of man”. Dragon geneticists were simply fulfilling the deep rooted whims of a group of unique beings affectionately called “Ba’al”. Ba’al manifestations (which naturally have no physical presence as we see it) theoretically are “several” (as in severed) characteristic of the Anunaki. This is not to say dragons had been overruled (as it were) by a much more ancient template. If anything the feedback I have received (from inherence) states they prided themselves over the uniqueness and originality of their T-Rex design which also happened to absolutely fulfil instructive guidelines of Ba’al. To truly comprehend the essence of what it is to be Anunaki, my best analogy is this. Imagine you possessed thirty independent mouths, each a vitally important route to the digestive system. Think how it would feel to be able experience the pleasure of lemon sorbet and mutton vindaloo independently and simultaneously at the same time. Then add twenty eight extra delicious courses, all to be consumed with identical synchronicity.

Talking of man (whether that is T-Rex or something else), how does the Anunaki’s deliberate devolution genetic program translate effectively? Why would they manufacture subordinates other than for control purposes?

We know we are not able to do what they can do just as our red corpuscles cannot do what we (the complete body and mind) can do. To overstate the analogy, it would be like asking your liver whether a trip to Spain was better than New Zealand. What is your liver’s perspective on life? What of the importance of the quantum layer? Should the impetus, cause, effect of every atom be reviewed individually to attain a complete picture? Putting that to one side while contemplating it at the same time, it is well known that science [fudge heads] claims we, humans, are a few million years old, but was supreme [i.e. in relation to Anunaki devolved genetic hierarchy] development of man from “ape” heritage as postulated?

The answer, of course, is (in part) yes, but not for the reasons stipulated by institutional academics and nor is original ape conceivably even vaguely comparable to anything that exists in that form today. I am not sure even if red corpuscles existed then. Also, as I have highlighted many times, genetic development is never accidental. Premeditating factors for evolution (or devolution) are many and varied and that is why frequent symbiotic changes accrue as accumulated differentials over time. In a nutshell, this is no simple discussion topic; the proverbial closed book. The more any serious student attempts to understand how genetics really work, the more alluvial (in the analogic uncontainable fluid sense) complexity bamboozles logic.

Indeed, It was through consequence of contemplating genetics against the so-called “rainbow serpent” domain, I finally deduced that most beings given the label “Anunaki” are simply aspects of the whole (as we are) or parts of “grand” God. The findings also prompt apparent contradictions with an earlier statement of mine which proposes “the Anunaki group is manifest God” (a proto existential organ and not the omnipresent potence parenthesis which is often hinted at by “religions”). Here I will try to demonstrate how both explanations compliment and contradict each other at the same time. Considering the many vicious wars that have interrupted the historic development of man, I am drawn to the very creation of Earth’s special lizard man; the Ciakar. Core genetic components of Pteroid, Sirian and Lyran have been pondered many times at this website, but dedication to the genus behind destined individual holistic roles has been lacking. Why is there currently a (long standing) rift between the Pteroids and Ciakars over us that is manipulated by the “Sephardim”?

Doubtlessly the constant top-down bottom-up “pyramid” battles that rage in so many known forms are simply variations of the same basic contradictions I have noted. Even though I state otherwise, we generally presume (in the dry science sense) that genetics are accidental and certainly not eternally ordained even though that which is labelled “evolution” by those mainstream proponents regularly undermines the dichotomy with natural miracles.

Avid followers of mine will note I frequently provide details on Anunaki genealogy all the way down to man. Evidence (coveted by mainstreamers) implies everything that lives on the planet surface could conceivably be a feasible derivative or version of human DNA. This standpoint would never be argued with absolute assurance (ignoring probable mainstream “cognitive dissonance” over details) mainly because, even if there was apt technology and knowhow to test the concept effectively, I fear there are too many [different] living things to find in a normal lifetime to remove any cause for ambiguity in results’ status. Surely by the time the last batch had been processed, the first may have already changed into something almost completely different. One wonders how Noah achieved his magical objectives so majestically!

So, to paraphrase prior releases on the subject, Anunaki genealogy (in relation to Earth) is rather more straightforward than many would assume. Ba’al (the group) is the Anunaki [light] “manifestation”. However individual unique beings under the overall corporate body adopt certain traits of the Anunaki and [therefore] each “being” is only part of the whole. The Sumerian Enlil-Enki (group versus individual) metaphor is rarely understood. Ba’al (Enlil – the group) created super-intelligent entities we colloquially call “dragons” (Enki) to act as supreme geneticists. Dragons themselves use numerous terminologies to satisfy their own hierarchical classifications. Their continuance of Anunaki genealogic ambition led to the development of a new superior life form that was gauged at a frequency band estranged from astral divinity – a spiritual being alien to “ascensionif you will. Nevertheless, this bandwidth was far greater than we could fathom (given our relatively impotent status) and “3D” existence was temporarily incorporated into the existential platform. The new beings did have access to divine knowledge contained in inherent records and suitable genetic features to assure their ability to manipulate quantum light DNA (something humans certainly cannot do and possibly have never even considered) in order to reproduce their own gene hierarchies.

The best indication dragons are divine can be witnessed in unique depictions of them as winged angels which are invariably barbarously corrupted by overzealous narcissists (ones that worship the beautiful saviour are particularly virulent) that do not understand the intricacies of quantum imaging. For example, some of our traditional folklore may not be quite as it seems. Dragons are natural masters at shape shifting and can whimsically “appear” as indefinitely human as you or I if the need so deserves. Their product Tyrannosaurus Rex (mentioned earlier in the capacity of original Earth man) also had some very strange unseemly abilities. These included advanced telepathy, telekinesis and extraordinary sensory perception. Anyone seeking further background can find insight on how far adrift our opinions of how dinosaur society really “functioned” here. Anyway, after the destruction of Maldek ended the dinosaurs’ reign on Earth (T-Rex included), dragons naturally coveted Sirian DNA tribute (sic). This is primarily why “man” (who they control) appears to have championed Atlantean spiritual idolatry even though virtually no true Sirian spirituality is reflected in modern day religious etiquette.

After the big dinosaurs had succumbed to the destruction of Maldek (which caused, as our sciences correctly speculate, the overwhelming meteor showers that ransacked Earth’s surface), a new man was made in homage of them. Rather bizarrely, the quantum DNA access exchanges were identical to prior dinosaur gene paths, but were still used as the resource elevation for this improved model. The new creation was a thinking beast but not a reptile. In fact it [effectively] began the tenure we like to term “the apes”. Pteroid (that thinking beast) was originally of such colossal size it may have been beyond imagination. An approximate Satyr, it began roaming the Earth the best part of 50 million years ago.  Innocently our mutual discovery tour has sprung another huge identity contradiction (against standard belief conventions of those that presume they are in the know). That is the Draco bloodlines are mammalian and not reptilian. In fact, Ciakar reptilians (modelled on T-Rex in part) are also characteristically (milk producing, dual blooded) mammalian, while their anatomy/libido functionality is quite alien compared against anything categorised as live by our sciences. Even “disputed” Neanderthal Sasquatch is one of those ironic living genetic bridges (between us and the Draco) and I wonder if that is why evidence affirming their active presence amongst us always ends up either vigorously debunked or “lost” by authorities.

The “man” humans identify with is a gross caricature of the Sirian identity complex which has been cordially amended to suit Sephardic mendacities. Even the Genome Project (in typical garbled fashion) notes our nucleic DNA is potentially very, very ancient – perhaps billions of years old.  Superficial heroes, such as the Buddha (an obvious Ciakar), Jesus (a larger than life fiction), Mohamed (the Pharisee in drag), Moses (the great imposter) popularise nobility (a feature of Sephardic control measures), but the causal truth behind Atlantis values has become all but obsolete. Even great documents of the ilk of the Mahabharata hardly come close to identifying with genuine Sirian pristine reasoning. Though I feel the current identity crisis is much more closely linked to Ciakar traditionalising ignorant human in their image than anything else, I will present a brief evolution history of Sirian man because we all should learn something from it. That aspect of our cloaked genetic heritage (I have iterated on several prior occasions) has a dreadful track record.  Sirian cultural development is bitter sweet.

We must take into account that the very beginning of that heritage would have appeared quite alien in culture even to most liberal minded of us.

It is hard to imagine that the very first Sirian “man” approximated a vaporous wraith. Floating aimlessly in the limitless ether, the form perhaps better identifies with our ocean jellyfish (whose innumerable tentacles are also a distinct Anunaki shape preference – emphasised by deities such as Hindu’s Goddess Durga). Over time the practicality of material existence demanded a more robust physical model. After much deliberation and debate by those that construct concepts a new image was created on the lines of what we identify with as upright man (i.e. symmetrical body with two legs, arms and head adorned with common functional facial features) today. Being physically human myself, it is even hard for me to adequately envisage totally alien sensory systems (i.e. no vision, hearing, touch, smell as we experience them); therefore I cannot know precisely how the earliest versions of Sirian identified with their functionality. In my capacity as transcendental oracle, I can say each of them felt as complete as I do and each was as happy with their individual relative completeness as I am.

In my opinion (though not formally verified yet) the earliest Sirian proto-physical forms were the very first Anunaki “reality” manifestations. Absolute reality conceptually confuses most people because they try to identify with their “sense” of what is perceived to exist. I have already highlighted that our cognitive bandwidth is dimensionally puny. To factor non-reality into the equation as well would be enough to blow the greatest minds. Also (funnily enough) non-reality is only real to those that can experience the comparative condition. This means that (adding to the Irony) bandwidth our perception classifies as “reality” is non-reality for the Anunaki. And that is one of the main reasons why the Draco have managed to secure (or perhaps “cocoon” is the correct terminology in this instance) this planet and why they will do everything in their power to halt or slow down our ascension. Though no topically academic purist dare ever suggest it, clearly there was much more to the Anunaki abruptly “leaving Earth” the best part of 40,000 years ago than has been popularised by supporting theories that attempt to verify ancient accounts. Taking emotional judgement away from findings, I deduce they actually left because they were unable to remain here even in proto physical form as their own ascension (of sorts) had progressed them too far up the astral ladder. Perhaps they were fed up with the constant chatter of apes too. Yes, that would explain their violent acts just prior to extrication from our domains. But in no way could that have been the “sole reason” for the exodus. Let’s face it, why would they leave in malice before finishing us off?

Vedic and other ancient texts report the main “event” as being a giant flood which caused a new ocean to form that stretched from today’s northern Africa to Caspian Sea (Russia). I can only refer to logic in my assessment of what I might detect as “practical truths”. Therefore, in order to verify the speculated creation of a giant ocean (as postulated), I can draw but one conclusion. Only by incorporating the “Anunaki” in the weather systems of that age would sufficient dedicated coordination permit the creation of entire oceans. According to ancient Celts, Beelzebub was the God of meteorology, so my reasoning does fit the subliminal script. Manipulation of weather systems (in my humble opinion) would be the only possible method of wreaking havoc on the monumental scale we are considering.

Taking that line of thinking a step further, were we to assume the Anunaki had always been incorporated into Earth weather systems since visiting our humble shores, it seems to corroborate their permanent lack of physicality by our simplistic definition. It places further important, nee grave questions as to the status of our heavens (highlighted perhaps by strange tales of aerial manipulation in World War Two, maybe?). Is the weather the accumulated result of accidental barometers our sciences speculate? Anyway, those that have read other articles of mine know well I argue the point about the Anunaki at length, fleshing out why it is so obvious that Atlantis humanoids acted as surrogate hosts for their divine masters.

The very first Sirians that came after the jellyfish types were colossal in size (maybe towering miles from the ground). Life systems of this variety are literally beyond comprehension to us (though not, it seems, the Prophet Enoch).  For instance individual IQ’s in the millions would also certainly be possible. Broken down, their own genetic catalogue was sufficient for them to create numerous unique series of life forms (enough to populate worlds) that might improve existence (for them). However, this corporeal power lionised a haughtiness which grew into an uncompromising superiority complex. The knock on effect (billions of years ago) pushed enflamed tensions to breaking point. Species alienated by Sirian aloofness joined forces and cordial disharmony eventually erupted into a giant war. No good result comes from battle and, in this case, fallout ensured the Orion’s Belt region was made uninhabitable for eons. Divine disrepair was even more significant and the universe narrowly avoided another Big Bang event.

Reparations against the Sirians were evoked by the ultimate corporate body. “God” removed some features of the gene catalogue which are now hidden behind the quantum exchange filter. Sadly resulting reduction in power had little to no effect on the enormous Sirian ego.

The next episode (which is almost a direct repeat of Sirius disorder) presented an earlier version of dragon welcoming newly outcast vagrant Sirians to Tiamat and details can be found here. Predicably presumptuous goodwill ended with the dragons’ recalcitrant guests totally destroying their planet. In fact if I chart the cataclysmic development of these psychotically dangerous humanoids, they began by destroying a star system. For that their DNA was downgraded. Next they shattered a large planet and suffered further DNA impotence. Finally there followed another violent attack which resulted in the artificial implosion of another planet (Maldek). That diabolical act very nearly wiped out humanity (as we were then) from existence. You guessed it. Our violent destroyers were discredited with another cosmic reduction of prowess. Indeed, there have been at least six significant downgrades prior to the creation of modern human. Most recent Atlantis Sirian was a shadow of the first type both in mind and stature (the maximum height of any Martian male would have been below 3 metres).

So when people say to me that the Atlanteans are (were) the model of morality, I can only presume cultural ignorance or the annoying tendency toward pathological deceit clouds any hope of sane concerns over divine values. None of humanity’s great role models are particularly revered by corporeal “God”. Holy Scripture issued in that vein approximates gibber. Human beings are notoriously (from the alien perspective) selfish (a trait that is an overhang from Sirian tradition). We deserve to do better, but laziness, cowardice and preference for the “best life” at all cost conflicts with virtuous pursuit. This is perhaps exacerbated by the male/female divide. Females are more inclined toward “reptilian” emotional manoeuvres (particularly emphasised by insane investment in/control of designate children), whereas men are spent and useless. Virtue has been reduced to parroting safe, “establishment endorsed” empty dogma.  Timeless principles of existence are all but eroded were it not for nature’s order.

We, humans, are undoubtedly evidence of an ever conflicting fusion of compassion and conscience. We live up to the identities of three prescient roles models: Ciakar, Pteroid and Sirian. The puzzle is great and one part remains unaddressed until now. Are the politics of man, ultimately, totally governed by those astral, enigmatic original gene holders, the Anunaki? To answer this, I am drawn to the creation of Ciakar which coincided with the import of fully alien Lyran feline DNA. Lemurians went to battle against the felines over the Earth surface around a million years ago for apparently inconsequential reasons, but what if that wasn’t the whole truth? Lemurians are part Sirian and part Zeta Grey Being (we also have Zeta DNA built into our mammoth gene catalogue). While entrenched on Earth’s surface, the Lemurians supposed their role as Anunaki’s supreme sovereign governors (often under strategic council from the Zetas, who have their own special connection with the Gods) for considerable periods. I question whether the Lemurians were not initially triggered (by the Anunaki) to undertake their earlier Earth surface conquest both for (hidden) purposes of assuming preordained leadership as well as purging “illegal” alien (Lyran) DNA. Subsequent to the Ciakars going underground with the Lyrans, the Anunaki were compelled to begin bonding with royal-bloods in order to preserve their direct relationship with (only part alien) Ciakar genetic heritage (or lose a significant part of themselves).

To explain Anunaki motive, the best analogy I can think of is this. Imagine your left arm refused to follow your mind’s orders and, for argument’s sake, unexplainably developed a mind of its own. Would you use every means in your arsenal to remedy the fault (from your perspective) up to purging it from the body or is the arm too precious to “waste”? This is what I think the Anunaki (over eons) have been doing to their recalcitrant subordinates, humans included. They, like us, would do anything possible to salvage all necessary parts.  In so many ways I respect them and honour them for that; for doing precisely what I would do facing an identical predicament.

Though this by no means ends my long history of man, I have provided considerable food for thought. Any more [information] would cloud lateral educative discovery, so here I end my tribute to man until possible future instalments. Will I reveal the unthinkable? Keep tuned and you will be sure to find out.

450,000 Years of Unquantified Earth History

Standard
450,000 Years of Unquantified Earth History

Plague_Zombies

As my other blog readers know, I have been working full time to survive (just like the dinosaurs) and this has severely restricted research and writing projects. Nevertheless, as those connected to astral channels will affirm, long working days have no effect on the constant information streams. If anything, due to the lack of extra-curricular activity (which may have otherwise clogged the airwaves), I have had a developmental renaissance guided by this most ancient, pure wisdom. Purity is never trite so pretty messages are the best evidence of false prophets. knobblyConversely, there are also no reds under the beds, hoards of paedophile-zombies roaming Indonesia’s tsunami stricken lands in search of orphans, ticking-time-bomb terrorists in the Akashic records. Those sorts of messages are strict propaganda. Unadulterated truth is always knobbly and usually rather confusing. This is because we have been fed so many lies (another word for hogwash) by individuals and groups overstating cases simply to conjure “reality”, that legitimacy has become almost unrecognisable. Indeed, certain factions have developed such heightened skills of rogue presentation, that facts are no longer necessary or welcome. Modelling has transcended data.

mayan-calendar-1000x667A point in case was touched on last post. Radio carbon dating has generated 70 years of data. Modelling is used to project absurd theories whereby, in truth, a 2,000 year old chipped rock may as well have been around “as is” for 2,000,000 years. Sure, most of the arguments supported by carbon dating “evidence” rely on contextual clues. However, going back to deep history, most (if not all) of these clues are benchmarked against opinions on context and are not actual evidence for dating. There is another gaping problem with radio carbon dating, in particular. Unless materials constantly “pop” in and out of existence, everything around today has existed for all time (in one form or another). An item collecting carbon over a 50 year cycle, for instance, has actually existed for eternity. To anyone keen on inspecting the detail, this should surely ring alarm bells as to the efficacy of this science-measurement. Whereas I realise that carbon dating works on the premise of something like the measurement of how new clothes age; i.e. assessing the rate/build up of soiling by analysing the gunk collected over time, but perhaps some garments are constantly rewashed or recycled foiling would-be detectives.

Data-ModellingSo, aside from the last 3,000 or so years, I do not accept geologic or archaeological accounts for the historic development of our planet. This is also because I have been substantively guided by the Akashic records which, I must say, present an almost alien landscape.  “Science”, dare I say it, has created innumerable stereotypes that, to a large degree affirm political-science-religious “reality”. Therefore, the dinosaurs could not have lived on a greenhouse planet with temperatures at least 20 degrees higher than todays and an atmosphere so muggy, modern human could not have survived it. That’s impossible because science models everything on current reality (i.e. those overstated cases and causes, I mentioned earlier). “Global warming” outcomes change depending on whether analysis accepts 800 years or 150 years’ worth of “data”. In my second uncompleted book, “A New World Order”, I come straight out and say, yes, the dinosaurs were wiped out by a meteor shower, eventually. In fact their demise took 12,000,000 years and (in some cases) engineered spectacular genetic shifts on the lines of Rosine Lallement’s widely publicised opinions. Our planet, at that time, was closer to the sun than Venus is today. Science suck that!

pusating lightThere is a revolving materialist-atheist theme to official make-believe and this is a focal point of my first book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”. There I project a pulsating light universe eternally blinking in and out of existence. Time is merely a consequence of “infinite” preformed scenarios slotting together to create the conditional matrix called “now” – the moment. For instance, a human arm cannot go too far without aid, unless it is detached from the body or subject to a whole different range of dimensional rules/laws. An arm cannot be anything other than an arm without a medical operation or some kind of, shall we say, intervention. It should be obvious, even to the casual observer, though, that the survival of the fittest mantra reinforces atheism and random forces in its promotion of anti-spirituality. Christ, being the epitome of Pharisaic order, therefore, is anti-spiritual. It is through this realisation that reason calculates the anti-Christ acts for the will of goodness. That’s how far reality is adrift from TRUTH.

Adam and Eve in the Garden by Michelangelo

There are many enigmatic (because they contradict/deny science-order) ancient texts. As important as any other reference source, the plain old Bible contains a lot of important information, but people do not understand it. True meanings have been shut out by long spun traditions, over the ages sometime conflicting with new “orders”, geared to shaping reality. It might surprise readers to know that the Adam and Eve “parable” was really about the creation of man; notably hu-man. Observe my choice of a hyphen between “hu” and “man”. It is deliberate. In accordance with the 450,000 years of real Earth history promised, a new version of man was created in “steps” (spanning about 50,000 years) over 300,000 years ago. neanderthal-manThis means the “finished article” roamed the Earth 250,000 years ago or so. It was a version of Homo erectus that became known as Neanderthal. Neanderthal is Adam. There were lots of different types and, arguably, fundamental science is correct in its assumption that base DNA components were collected from Australopithecus.

To observe that in the short passage, Adam and Eve, in Genesis you have to read the text very carefully and evaluate every (Hebrew) word in positional context. By that I mean each word relative to another or group might convey deliberate multiple meanings. Hebrew is a cut down cosmic language (and that is why some letters, intermingled with alien “rune”, are found in script on occasionally recovered spacecraft wrecks) for chroniclers and is designed to allow transcendental writing. Decoding text is a lot of work, but if diligence is applied thoroughly, the ciphers can be cracked to unveil purity. ca7c7044a0fcf01f956a0846f6cf25ddMy third book, “The Birth of Hu-man-ity” (only sketches and notes at the moment) will demonstrate the correct steps to interpretation. It also draws on some of the “parallel” Sumerian tablets that appear (in some ways) to contradict the biblical account. Once again, there is no discrepancy providing information is decoded correctly.

Not too long ago I presented to a Sydney audience and stated (unheard) to the listless mob that there could be billions of Enki manifests, because the name literally means individual (I) spirit (chi). Thus, there probably were also a tribe or many tribes of “Adam”. Ironically, Enlil means “one of the group” and the modern group is attempting to paralyse (another word for evil) individuals into conformity. So what about “Eve”? Well, he is nothing like the conformist interpretation. That’s right, he. Compared to grisly Neanderthal the butchest human men look relatively feminine and, honestly, some are prettier than Neanderthal women. No, lipstick doesn’t help. Trust me. About 125,000 years ago human was created as an unauthorised fusion of Ciakar reptilian, Atlantean (from Atlantis) and “Australopithecus” genetics in different measures (i.e. there are numerous human races).

cernunnos-bust6-US-WU75712A4Celtic Hu Gadam (The mighty one) is often depicted as a reptilian (Pteroid) wild horned, rodent faced beast that traditionally heralds from the “underworld”. Hierarchically, the Pteroids are more senior to Ciakars (of which there are copious types, some not looking even remotely reptilian, incidentally!) and they had the relationship with Version Six Atlantean human via the Drakkon (dragons). In fact, the Pteroids were possibly involved in the creation of Earth made Ciakars. Technically we are the first version of human, but as there is no word to represent human with absence of “hu”, Altlanteans and other (sometimes vaguely) “human looking” types have been given a de facto, colloquial, categorisation.

The unauthorised creation of humans had a dramatic effect on Earth politics and was one of the factors leading to the 18,000 years’ war. So dangerous was the affront on this incubus species, the Atlanteans swiftly volunteered to move us off planet out of relative harm’s way. Reasons for Atlantean support were complex and not merely related to harvesting their kindred stock. Millions of years earlier the Ciakar “chameleon” reptilian had been created by dragons using Tyrannosaur DNA, Pteroid “man” in combination with samples donated by Version Five “human” (the Atlantean predecessors) from their gene pool. That was the first attempt at breeding a local (Earth bound) humanoid-reptilian. Many million years ago the dragons were given rights to “human” DNA as retribution after the disastrous war that destroyed Maldek (their home planet) and ended the dinosaurs. With it they made the Pteroids. It was these that worked with the Ciakar-reptilians to cause the circumstances (i.e. our creation) that led to complications with the Annunaki which was one of the reasons we were moved off planet 120,000 years ago.

hqdefaultAccording to the Epic of Gilgamesh, sometimes called the “Sumerian Kings’ List”, Earth ownership has been documented as calendar of regents. The details are a great enigma for atheist science as some “kings” reigned for 10,000’s of years. Of course no individual metabolic organism can survive “intact” over 1000 years in the material plane so, clearly, ancient texts referred to higher planes. Detail discussed in The Beauty of Existence Decoded, our physical plane offers a very limited bandwidth, thus, from the materialist-atheist-science perspective, (most of) the higher realms “don’t exist”. Our pineal gland can act as a bridge or conduit between planes, though, without activation, many characters central to the Epic of Gilgamesh plot would be obsolete; are “fantasy” (in the atheist-materialist sense). Beings that live 10,000’s years have enormous “genetic IQ’s” and would comfortably reside in dimensions five or greater (i.e. relativity free light realms). Some of the characteristics/properties/”dividers” of the dimension realms are also covered in The Beauty of Existence Decoded.

Annual500In other words those “kings” did not exist by modern atheist-materialist governed definition. Instead, Atlantean “human” acted as a bridge for the living experience of greater powers and, although they were advanced of our physical frequency (in the way we experience today), they would still have been relatively material. In fact they needed to be (physical) as they built a dreadful reputation for being slave drivers of the lowest moral ethics (by human conscience determined standards). I feel I have left so much important information out that comprehensions may be inhibited. Thankfully, everything will be in A New World Order when I release it. For instance, there were two very chaotic periods of history resulting in giant cosmic wars 2,300,000 and 750,000 years ago that deserve thorough inspection to understand the complex state of affairs 200,000 years ago. I have not worked out after which Great War Version Five human was downgraded to put Atlantis man into effect. Hopefully by the time the book is published my guides will have revealed the truth. I can say that the powers ended up abusing the hell out of Adam, Homo erectus that loved the African plains (I should advise modern Africa was two separate continents then and I am referring to the southernmost landmass).

Stonehenge2Everything was very different. What we call the Pacific Ocean today was substantively water free, then. Yet much of our Europe was submerged. Readers must also appreciate that (moon) Falla dumped an enormous amount of ice (which eventually melts) on our planet after the circa 12,800BC catastrophe that ended Atlantis, so the land/sea ratio was much higher prior to this. Indeed after the real “polar switch” in 10,583BC which literally saw the Earth’s crust detach from the core, “slip” and shake the surface contents like a “paper weight snow scene” also played a big hand in casting the modern Earth topology. Not a pretty sight though. How anything could have survived that, well, God only knows! Yet, the Mayan/Incan doomsday calendar “wheel of the sun” was chipped just prior to that catalyst and Stonehenge is a relic of millions of years old spirituality which tapped into Earth’s essence. Nevertheless, very few “humans” (colloquial categories included) would have wandered the planet prior to the Mars exodus between 32,000 and 31,000BC, say. Even numbers then (post exodus) were miniscule compared to today’s bulging populations. With, at some periods, only 100’s or low 1000’s of humans on the planet it should be no wonder physical evidence is scant indeed.

cosmic war

Only after the spectacular departure of the Annunaki around 33,000BC was it deemed safe for humans to return. Archaeological evidence suggests small numbers of natural humans (as opposed to Atlanteans) came here up to 20,000 years prior. The reasons are too bizarre for sane explanations, so that truth will wait for A New World Order. Other than proto-physical Lemurians, the mystical Asiatic Lumerians, a smattering of Atlantean “industrialists”, prior to the Mars exodus (after 32,000BC) the planet was inhabited by (or infested with) apes – Homo erectus (Adam). Some varieties could talk (although our science claims otherwise) but their mindset was very different to ours. The character of the Neanderthal face is unmistakable. I see elements of it in all races (but not everyone). Ironically, or perhaps not so, the greatest prevalence of those traits can be found in the Semites.

impish 'grey beings'There was a population explosion around 160,000BC when “southern” Africa had become an ecological disaster. The Lemurians may have been forced to intervene, but the continent had become extremely dangerous as Neanderthal is a “thinking being” (though not on the same wavelength as human), physically very powerful and can be extremely violent, if necessary. A technological intervention would have certainly damaged the planet, so they seem to have found a psychological solution. Archaeological evidence proposes Neanderthals had music, spirituality and knowledge of the cosmos by 100,000BC (which, in fact, is more likely to be 120,000BC and prior, given the 18,000 years’ war). I know there was a renaissance period about 80,000 years ago and it was after that Lumerian conjuring mystics settled on Earth. Yes-butThey, of course, had lived alongside Atlanteans, natural humans, placid, affectionate reptilian bipeds, child-like Grey Beings and domesticated Neanderthals on Mars, prior. It was, contrary to the Romanised stigma, the planet of peace at that time.

Well that was a silly idea. I thought I could cram 450,000 years of Earth history on one humble blog page. It was never going to happen! So, I have decided I will soon scope a very rough account for the period 102,000BC to 10,583BC as a future post. My work commitments cease after next week and will afford me a month break. There should be plenty of spare hours to devote to this saga. In the meantime keep well & see you presently.