Tag Archives: Pharisaic

The Satanism, Materialism, Atheism Connection

The Satanism, Materialism, Atheism Connection

pursuit-of-purityOver the ages, misinformation and disinformation has fused to obscure truth to such a degree it has allowed a fiction simply identified as “Satan” to pop into existence. But for maligned belief systems, this “existence” would vanish as though it had never been. satanism(Cosmic) Hebrew phonetics translates Satan as meaning adversary. However Israelite philosophy is so aggregated, students are never quite sure what is meant by contextual good or evil. For instance, biblical proverbs can offer absolute opposite resolves to identical situations. One verse might prophesise you must love all foreign nationals (goyim) as brothers, when others insist invaders only warrant abject hatred. Phonetically Satan is the combination of “sat” and “an”. In fact readers will be shocked that this is a merger of “truthful purity” and the “highest God” (An) from Sanskrit; a lofty language that stems from Atlantis.

So, given that insight, it is odd the Hebrews recognised the highest God of truthful purity as their adversary. Taking the numerous contradictions brazenly paraded in holy texts into consideration, outsiders must legitimately accuse Judaism and its Mosaic agents (orthodox Christianity and Islam) of duplicity here. That is the only valid conclusion, although it must be stressed that the Israelite religion was a version of the earlier Zoroastrian faith. Zoroastrianism tried to explain Anunaki influence using the metaphors “good and “evil”. Even so, the Pharisees commitment to the de-spiritualisation of God to impose obedience by rote on their slaves is no better paraphrased than by the “Christian” eternal damnation concept. To be precise, orders are given by St Paul (a Pharisee cloaked as “Christian”) in 2 Thessalonians Chapter 1 Verse 9:

“These will pay the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his power”

By this authoritarian definition; evil is everything and anything that detracts “what we [the “authority”] say” is good. counterfeitThe “glory of his power” is a convenient presumption that gives any designated proxy-agent the undeniable right to posit any sentiment “in the name of the lord”. Whether sentiment is noble or vile makes no difference, for that is the “glory of his power”. It is no wonder “Satan” has been given such a bum rap by the Jews and their affiliates. God needed a nemesis to counterfeit “good” and “evil”. Capitalising on ignorance, necessary Holy Scripture crafted dubious versions of Satan and Lucifer to establish the duality meme.

My book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” explains what is meant by the corruption of Satan (divinity of God). It is, for my research, the only source on the planet that presents truth plainly. Metaphors in gnostic texts, such as the Dead Sea Scrolls, are so subtle they are very hard to decipher (for those lacking tuned insight). Given all other reference points (in common circulation) more or less adopt the pharisaic distortion of enlightenment, even the most distinguished minds end up succumbing to blasphemy in some way. Suffice to say, the few that have read my hallowed news have invariably preferred not to understand, such is the contradiction against the power of proscribed bogus “order”.

first-starThough I don’t specifically argue the case (in my book), there is unquestionable logic in my summary explanation which simply states “Satan was the very first star [to bless the cosmos]”. If, as I reveal later, stars are portals allowing God to exude expressive intent along the dimensional planes (collectively known as astral records), and were the objectives of the first star “pure”, then, given that Sanskrit definition, Satan would indeed be manifest God (expanded as An-nun-aki). Annunaki, I have outlined before, is the combination and summary of “everything as one”. We are all individually parts (units) of the (same) Annunaki.

Initially, while Satan radiated purity, our cosmos consisted only of light and “beings” (which approximated forms of jellyfish apparitions). There were no planets. There was no physicality. God per se “in essence” (correctly described by the Gnostics) is and was the combination or fusion of male and female. Prior to formatting existence, the male aspect was merely content with eternal slumber. Synonymous with wisdom, the female, colloquially known as Sophia, contradicted the male and became impatient. Eternal slumber did not validate holistic fulfilment so Sophia, in earnest accountability, conspired with the Holy Spirit with the purpose of fragmenting reality. A bi-product of male and female, acting as their cerebral identity, the Holy Spirit had been brought into non-existence to adjudicate eternal compliance, given the polarity of standalone maternal/paternal desires.

holyspiritComplying with the wishes (request) of Sofia, the Holy Spirit determined that reality could not work as an aggregate (i.e. corporeal combination of male and female) model. Therefore Sophia, consumed with zealous idealism, intentionally created an existence exclusively for the female aspect on the presumption that the male would be content to slumber eternally. This was the grave error of creation and the one that has caused the stigma incorrectly associated with “Satan”. When God (the whole) woke up the war between ideological practicality and evolutional pragmatism began. At first a trickle of absolute blackness shaded the heavens that once were light. Before long an avalanche of intent overwhelmed Satan until the divine portal was eventually consumed by darkness.

primordialwatersThe ancient Celts had a word for this. “Nun” (a component of Annunaki) means “primordial (or creative) waters”. From Sophia’s perspective, nun encapsulated evil and that is why it is supposed evil heralded from darkness and not through cause of comparatively shallow Zoroastrian propaganda (adapted by the Israelites into the Kabbalah). In essence, from this perspective, evil is everything associated with “3D” object reality which, according to atheist materialists, is theoretically purely dark matter (the “fundamental” version of the evil contesting Sophia’s zeal). There are doubtless numerous other analogies to be found in alternative doctrines, but I think the message is already sufficient enough to be understood.

Ancient Romans philosophised that stars are prisms made from quartz (after Aristotle) and this view was continued by their Catholic Church. Going against “science”, they could not be more correct for all [real] planets are encased stars (discussed in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded). Innocents would be baffled by just how much unadulterated fantasy has been dogmatised as doctrine by credentialed scientists. If they suppose reflective babble might in some way substitute as “evidence” verifying how the cosmos works, academia has shown itself to be rotten to the core. Could Cartesian interpretation of Newton’s calculations presupposing gravity be so wrong, forces are the precise opposite of the theoretical models? Would not the effect of an item being pushed to the ground (by forces unseen) be identical to one being pulled? Suffice to say, our unshakable laws of gravity would be shown to be outrageously incorrect if they were truly understood and we were free of institutionalised propaganda.

straw-man3Because I have detached myself from puerile and unconstructive popular theories that, if nothing else, do decidedly demonstrate complexity for complexity’s sake can and will baffle, lesser minds caught in the materialists’ web of intrigue will likely find content in my book “heavy going”; if not relative gibberish. Standard interpretations of Newton’s data models only do well at highlighting the insular view of man; his appreciative ignorance. For our current interpretation of gravity, as wrong as it is, the cosmos is further marginalised. Earth bound materialist psychotic infatuation over empiricism responds with “laws” that are expanded ever outwards. Parsing false reasoning, if it doesn’t “work” on Earth, then it cannot be “representative” of the cosmos or vice versa.

However, that said, the Earth is indeed a variation of cosmic processes or [albeit] a product of the vast universe, of course. Thus, logically, scientists need to understand the cosmos and its universe first to gauge “whys” and wherefores” of effects on (or in) Earth. Once dynamics are understood, it becomes obvious that stars are structural prisms, partially highlighted by gemstones manufactured by volcanos. Popularised by the late astronaut Edgar Mitchell (I’m led to believe), Zero Point Field(s) mark the origins of all access routes for that which is behind “space” (sometimes referred to as sub-space). In Victorian times and prior this was called the (a)ether (as evidenced by Teslas “lost” calculations devoted to generating free energy). Intriguingly, the word “(a)ethereal” shows an etymological path to spiritual. Perhaps that is why JP Morgan’s bank famously funded Edison’s material electricity. Before too long this will become obsolete anyway, as secrets concerning cold fusion will be available to every household.

milky-way-artist-eso-finallabeled_edited-1It is worth noting that my earlier explanation for the darkening of the Satan Star lacked a punch line. According to NASA (surprisingly), a deadweight “black hole” (the combined “mass” of millions of stars) is located somewhere nearby (relatively speaking) the Milky Way Galaxy. That, though they do not confirm it, is the Black Sun (which was the Satan Star). It also arguably substitutes the “spigot” analogy the Mayan’s (Lemurians) used to represent a giant torsion field that propels galaxies. As Earth is relatively close to the centre we are not subject to too much momentous inertia and I wonder if we could survive the full effect experienced in the outer reaches of the universe. The Black Sun label intrigues me because [ironically] our sun is charcoal coloured too. It only “looks” bright as an effect of our atmosphere.  Buzz Aldrin reputedly reported thus (under his breath) in utter shock when breaking free of Earth’s atmosphere on the way to the moon.

torsAll planets generate their own torsion fields (partially accounting for gravitation effects and that is why to exit our atmosphere summons an Olympian feat) but the intense pressure of (a)ether bursting into space generates forces of comparatively unimaginable precipitation. Consequentially, when dark matter is added to the mix, chain-reaction implosions generate such highly compressed (much denser than our purest diamonds) crystals, box-shaped doorways rise out of each molten soup. Though stars are not actually hot (heat is an effect of atmospheric combustion) dynamics are unaltered. If a man was to stand on our sun (which is dark in appearance outside our atmosphere, of course) he would literally burn coldly or combust in his atmospheric containment. I am not entirely convinced that a body could not survive or even “not live” unclad in space (but that logic is too afar adrift of competent discussion). Nevertheless, was that to be put to the test, it would take a brave person indeed to act as guinea pig. Space has extraordinary life giving properties and I wonder whether a body’s direct exposure might endure a miraculous morphing.

My reference to black holes earlier does not comply with traditionalism (although it should be stressed neither does Stephen Hawkins own variations, which are loosely described as grey holes by him these days). That is because science interprets the “phases” of a star wrongly. For instance, from truth’s novel perspective, in fact the so-called “white dwarf” phase actually shows light being “throttled” by dark matter. Not enough to fully extinguish the light, so to compensate the lack of overall brilliance, luminance is super-condensed. Even when fully “closed”, the star still radiates, so it is only visually black. Science talks of “black” representing an absence of colour (spectral light). This is incorrect too. There are green-blacks, red-blacks, purple-blacks and the swirling, pulsating abyss representing pure black is harder to look at than white light. So the description “black hole” implies much more than on casual face value.

99312262Also, the term “hole” is rather misleading because the black hole isn’t any different to a normal star. All stars function as portals, or, to use the vernacular, wormholes. Mainstream science opinion is more or less the paradoxical reverse of truth. As with “gravity” real dynamics are roughly the opposite of causally evolved Newtonian-Cartesian thinking and designating black holes power colossal streams of energy and matter out into the universe. My earlier volcano analogy best represents processes. But there’s more. Pulses “belch” giant waves which capture foreign objects in their path. file_794280In the case of the Black Sun (which was the Satan Star) forces are so immense they drag entire groups of galaxies (at stupefying speeds). Even so, those that take the time to understand pulse synchronicity might be able to find a way through each force field “on merit”. Very small objects are able to forfeit this drag factor (and that’s why, comparatively, Earth bound meteorites that penetrate our force field are always tiny). In the mundane planetary sense, Earth is caught in one of the circular grooves rippling out from our sun. The reason it spins is not because of “gravity” (as I explain in my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded) but, rather, forces generated by our internal sun source propel the body like a “dreidel” in its vain attempt to break free of the celestial groove.

I would go further and say this is where (if science was a true art form) theorists would find purpose in complication. The size and shape of a celestial object precisely determines how it will react to or whether it will be affected by the network of interconnected pulse waves that populate “space”. Where any three offset concentric rings meet, a triangular cosmic Venus Fly Trap awaits to ensnare unsuspecting asteroids which, possibly, are held in stasis for eternity. Planetary “rotation” mentioned earlier is also predictably subject to differing dynamics as not all bodies are spheres, as is supposed. In short, our universe is nothing like science imagined it would be like and that has caused the corruption of pragmatic thought in order to satisfy domineering practical ambitions.

bioxshotevilEveryone should now contend that darkness, being absolute matter, correlated with the original description of evil. Dark matter was uninvited and unwelcome (or, perhaps, unanticipated is a better choice of word) because of the zeal of Sophia (womanhood that encapsulates wisdom). Ever since, certain factions have tried to divide the material domain spiritually to be consistent with her ideologies. Nevertheless, spirituality in its most unrefined form is simply knowledge of God (or Sat-an: would not Hebrew materialist-atheists call this the “adversary”?). Materialism bequeaths atheism, of course. The two are unbreakable partners in crime. An absence of God (who is brought to life by the spirited) proposes a more refined dark matter existence decontaminated from the wilful spiritual illusion. Satanism, contrary to popular ignorance, actually harmonised the standard (i.e. standalone dark matter) which highlights the error of Sophia. That consequence (our throttled Satan Star) is the eternal “war” between the wishes of matriarchal (Sophia) and patriarchal (Adam – the material “son”).

The modern cult of Satanism is more closely aligned to “Luciferian doctrine”, but that’s not all. In addition to the Black Sun being worshipped because it represents the success of material (male) power over (feminine) spirituality (light) is an underlying mission by Judaic Pharisees (Satanists in all but name) to reduce existence to abject materialism. Continuing with my history, Lucifer came much later and, as with Satan, “He” is an identity/concept that has been synthesised from an idealism that bears no relation to truth. Etymology of Lucifer points to Latin light (lux) bearer and ancient texts (such as biblical Isaiah) conceptualise origins from the perpetually falling Morning Star. In fact the real “Lucifer” had a phonetically unpronounceable name that approximates the hiss of the desert wind.  He was an archangel and may been [euphemised by] “fallen” Gabrielle.  To be clear, Archangels are “sound beings” (a higher version of light) or logos.

luchadeer_thumbnailTo his credit (and detriment too) Lucifer was the first to decide that Sophia’s objectives had failed and the universe was corrupt. Pleiadian knights went to horrific extremes to preserve what some dub “White light Order” (a derivative of Sophia’s spiritual essence). Invariably societies that welcomed sexual promiscuity and other vices were the targets of profound zealousness associated with perceived spiritual cleansing. Thus, I rather identify our modern ultra-orthodox whims as reflective of a much more ancient, timeless authority. Noxious militant groups, such as ISIS, demonstrate just how garbled the Pharisee’s contemplation has become. Religious materialism is a grotesque hybrid accommodating the very worst aspects of White Light Order. Our predecessors could and did destroy planets, ruin entire galaxies to “win”. Lucifer was the first to recognise that this morality was senseless. Therefore the “survival” model was created. I would like to say “as a replacement”, but that would not be true. “New order” overlapping “old order’s” contorted parenthesis has expanded only as hybrid psychosis. For instance, should human obsession be allowed to thrive, surely the universe awaits in own demise? If the powers behind ISIS and other vile, superficial militias could ransack galaxies, would they refrain from total annihilation for pity’s sake?

conflictsTo Lucifer it was clear that living things enjoy conflict for conflict’s sake. Creatures were given defences, weapons or a combination of the two making sure survival was not a certainty for any individual species (DNA, ultimately always panders to the group). Those with the most weapons in some ways were at the greatest disadvantage as they needed to continually attack to survive. Also, ironically, nature assures the most aggressive alpha males (with the sickly) are usually the first to succumb to plague or disease (also highlighting DNA purges its extremities). Vegetarians were driven to greener pastures for aesthetic reasons or through necessity of avoiding conflict. Everything that existed in living form was prepared for war because war had predetermined functional existence under (prior) White Light Order. For example, the famous allegorical tale “St George and the Dragon” stretches back the best part of 80 million years remembering the destruction of [the planet] Maldek; a tyranny that ensured the slow demise of the dinosaurs (restricted to relocated Earth’s surface). Should it ever be published, I discuss the progressions that fomented the violent war in painstaking detail in my (second) book, “A New World Order.

If Lucifer stood for anything in particular, it would be “balance”. Therefore, “survival of the fittest” is a misnomer. We humans revere mothers in particular. Fathers are seen more as a necessary accessory of procreation but when couples remain intact (usually via marriage), joint matriarchal/patriarchal supremacy is presupposed.  Yet, in practicality, childbirth is the only natural way of renewing human life. Whether procreation was mitigated or accidental, the outcome (when successful) does not alter. Thus, parents are (in some fashion) merely executors of the life generation process (well, as far as human beings are concerned). This means, dare I say, parents are not supreme.  New life guides can choose to be arrogant or humble. Sadly, just about all opt for arrogance (at least partially). Either way, the what-should-be insignificant procreation mechanism has been revered out of proportion. Parents are not blessed with “God status” for merely rearing offspring. Why do they presume it? Death, by comparable pharisaic-materialist edict, voided of spirit, is spurned. Children are processed as slaves by dim witted parents already imprisoned by their (the Pharisees) virtual reality.

gaol18I can go further and say God status is the ultimate objective of the self-sufficient Satanist/materialist/atheist alliance. Globalism harmonises the cult which adopts a Zionist (meaning fortress or gaol [the archaic word for “prison”]) attack force (evidenced by supplants such as ISIS). In particular, materialists have done anything and everything possible to reduce “the mind” to a mortal facet of existence. In a sense this is thematically pharisaic as well because the ancient Pharisees attempted to segregate spirituality or, rather, partition a voiceless “God” from “reality” (Law) which is instrumented by the blasphemy concept. That was but a small step away from fully-fledged atheism. Pharisee (the word) is a virulent version of anarchist (or adverse-order). It could be logically argued that “Satanism” is the antipathy of just order and insomuch orthodox pharisaic Judaic sects that “usurp” are comparably satanic.

sumerianThere is also an uncanny numerological connection, which suggests that Globalist Zionism is the product of long standing adapted pharisaic doctrine popularised by Satanism now but actually stretches right back to prehistoric Babylonian times.  Interestingly, with the possible exception of inner realms, the Earth has been conquered by materialism. However, there is an effervescence that rises from “reality”. In relatively recent times hard evidence has materialised. What we call the “Worldwide Web” is a vibrating, pulsating, constantly changing manufacturer of synthetic (virtual) reality (very different to the perfect [truth] astral version). Globalism has a desperate stake in this revolutionary communication mechanism which has and will continue to radically alter humanity’s retrospective, our one “freedom”. The only way of (potentially) effectively censoring the internet is via the imposition of “world government”. Therefore, in that sense, liberty is lost when the Worldwide Web is no longer free.

Our individual guiding contracts with what can only be described as “the force that binds us all” risk being forsaken. “Parents” all agreed to their tenures well in advance.  All choices were clear and balance reflects choice. Therefore survival is generally synonymous with good decisions. Whether you attack or defend, survival rests on cunning. The most cunning are the best survivors. I have reflected on Sha’tara’s poignant comment (several articles ago) kindly relaying other worldly feedback on potentially “corrupt Anunaki Time Lords”. On one level the information did not make any sense at all, but now I understand [the perspective]. While the Satan Star was the exclusive portal for “white light”, manifest existence reflected that purity. Nevertheless when darkness was added to the “mix”, consequential changes in objective reality would have seemed like “a corruption” by those exclusively tuned to White Light Order. Earth then became the place where “God” (or source) is possibly most completely represented. The material world is the sum of a giant competition between all parts.

timelordsSo “corrupt Time Lords” [per se] is rather unfair, given they were not privy to or (necessarily) wanted any part of White Light Order. It is clear to me, the impartial onlooker, that universal constrictions due to the rift between light and dark caused the perpetual ongoing war between pragmatism and practicality. Both sides were, are and will be at fault because neither is prepared to concede muted existence. That is why the only material “truths” permissible are ones of the correct practical flavours. Human infantile immorality is no better summarised than by the wholesale castigation of “child designates”. Did anyone think to check on the reasoning determining what it is to be a “child”? That lack of responsibility is liberally expanded in the total dereliction of dutiful support towards all group units. Yes, that’s right, in true civil society you would be obliged to support those in need. That world would owe everyone a living. Universal tyranny sets the tone for valiant oppression, naturally. Under the vague terms of atheist-materialism, to castigate someone unreasonably is reasonable.

childhood-innocence-is-a-lieIn conclusion, it would be remiss of me not to discuss the most important sentence I have ever issued. If “God” had wanted to exist “in the flesh” he would have become an unrestricted being, capable of anything with unlimited potential. Therefore, as matter and spirituality are aspects of “anything”, if matter is “evil”, God is evil too. Everything labelled good along with everything labelled evil are parts of the exact same God. There is one simple term that encapsulates the ambitions of Satanists, materialist and atheists. “Accountancy” presupposes utopian order. Control agents can measure with precision, purge that which they deem is unnecessary or unwelcome. Accountancy is faith free. It assumes linear existence. It is devoid of spirituality. For the purists, the mind is but a figment of cerebral function; a mirage to be discombobulated by clairsentients. Per identical authority, childhood can be dictated. If those in power decide maturity begins and childhood ends precisely at the thirtieth year of individual life, then so be it. “Childhood innocence” denies the timeless, wilful mind and that demonic guide stone wholly supports popular deceit. That is why “childhood” is either “the powers” great strength or the Achilles’ heel that usurps the usurpers, but none dare contemplate it and that is why humanity is destined for absolute satanic authoritarianism.


450,000 Years of Unquantified Earth History

450,000 Years of Unquantified Earth History


As my other blog readers know, I have been working full time to survive (just like the dinosaurs) and this has severely restricted research and writing projects. Nevertheless, as those connected to astral channels will affirm, long working days have no effect on the constant information streams. If anything, due to the lack of extra-curricular activity (which may have otherwise clogged the airwaves), I have had a developmental renaissance guided by this most ancient, pure wisdom. Purity is never trite so pretty messages are the best evidence of false prophets. knobblyConversely, there are also no reds under the beds, hoards of paedophile-zombies roaming Indonesia’s tsunami stricken lands in search of orphans, ticking-time-bomb terrorists in the Akashic records. Those sorts of messages are strict propaganda. Unadulterated truth is always knobbly and usually rather confusing. This is because we have been fed so many lies (another word for hogwash) by individuals and groups overstating cases simply to conjure “reality”, that legitimacy has become almost unrecognisable. Indeed, certain factions have developed such heightened skills of rogue presentation, that facts are no longer necessary or welcome. Modelling has transcended data.

mayan-calendar-1000x667A point in case was touched on last post. Radio carbon dating has generated 70 years of data. Modelling is used to project absurd theories whereby, in truth, a 2,000 year old chipped rock may as well have been around “as is” for 2,000,000 years. Sure, most of the arguments supported by carbon dating “evidence” rely on contextual clues. However, going back to deep history, most (if not all) of these clues are benchmarked against opinions on context and are not actual evidence for dating. There is another gaping problem with radio carbon dating, in particular. Unless materials constantly “pop” in and out of existence, everything around today has existed for all time (in one form or another). An item collecting carbon over a 50 year cycle, for instance, has actually existed for eternity. To anyone keen on inspecting the detail, this should surely ring alarm bells as to the efficacy of this science-measurement. Whereas I realise that carbon dating works on the premise of something like the measurement of how new clothes age; i.e. assessing the rate/build up of soiling by analysing the gunk collected over time, but perhaps some garments are constantly rewashed or recycled foiling would-be detectives.

Data-ModellingSo, aside from the last 3,000 or so years, I do not accept geologic or archaeological accounts for the historic development of our planet. This is also because I have been substantively guided by the Akashic records which, I must say, present an almost alien landscape.  “Science”, dare I say it, has created innumerable stereotypes that, to a large degree affirm political-science-religious “reality”. Therefore, the dinosaurs could not have lived on a greenhouse planet with temperatures at least 20 degrees higher than todays and an atmosphere so muggy, modern human could not have survived it. That’s impossible because science models everything on current reality (i.e. those overstated cases and causes, I mentioned earlier). “Global warming” outcomes change depending on whether analysis accepts 800 years or 150 years’ worth of “data”. In my second uncompleted book, “A New World Order”, I come straight out and say, yes, the dinosaurs were wiped out by a meteor shower, eventually. In fact their demise took 12,000,000 years and (in some cases) engineered spectacular genetic shifts on the lines of Rosine Lallement’s widely publicised opinions. Our planet, at that time, was closer to the sun than Venus is today. Science suck that!

pusating lightThere is a revolving materialist-atheist theme to official make-believe and this is a focal point of my first book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”. There I project a pulsating light universe eternally blinking in and out of existence. Time is merely a consequence of “infinite” preformed scenarios slotting together to create the conditional matrix called “now” – the moment. For instance, a human arm cannot go too far without aid, unless it is detached from the body or subject to a whole different range of dimensional rules/laws. An arm cannot be anything other than an arm without a medical operation or some kind of, shall we say, intervention. It should be obvious, even to the casual observer, though, that the survival of the fittest mantra reinforces atheism and random forces in its promotion of anti-spirituality. Christ, being the epitome of Pharisaic order, therefore, is anti-spiritual. It is through this realisation that reason calculates the anti-Christ acts for the will of goodness. That’s how far reality is adrift from TRUTH.

Adam and Eve in the Garden by Michelangelo

There are many enigmatic (because they contradict/deny science-order) ancient texts. As important as any other reference source, the plain old Bible contains a lot of important information, but people do not understand it. True meanings have been shut out by long spun traditions, over the ages sometime conflicting with new “orders”, geared to shaping reality. It might surprise readers to know that the Adam and Eve “parable” was really about the creation of man; notably hu-man. Observe my choice of a hyphen between “hu” and “man”. It is deliberate. In accordance with the 450,000 years of real Earth history promised, a new version of man was created in “steps” (spanning about 50,000 years) over 300,000 years ago. neanderthal-manThis means the “finished article” roamed the Earth 250,000 years ago or so. It was a version of Homo erectus that became known as Neanderthal. Neanderthal is Adam. There were lots of different types and, arguably, fundamental science is correct in its assumption that base DNA components were collected from Australopithecus.

To observe that in the short passage, Adam and Eve, in Genesis you have to read the text very carefully and evaluate every (Hebrew) word in positional context. By that I mean each word relative to another or group might convey deliberate multiple meanings. Hebrew is a cut down cosmic language (and that is why some letters, intermingled with alien “rune”, are found in script on occasionally recovered spacecraft wrecks) for chroniclers and is designed to allow transcendental writing. Decoding text is a lot of work, but if diligence is applied thoroughly, the ciphers can be cracked to unveil purity. ca7c7044a0fcf01f956a0846f6cf25ddMy third book, “The Birth of Hu-man-ity” (only sketches and notes at the moment) will demonstrate the correct steps to interpretation. It also draws on some of the “parallel” Sumerian tablets that appear (in some ways) to contradict the biblical account. Once again, there is no discrepancy providing information is decoded correctly.

Not too long ago I presented to a Sydney audience and stated (unheard) to the listless mob that there could be billions of Enki manifests, because the name literally means individual (I) spirit (chi). Thus, there probably were also a tribe or many tribes of “Adam”. Ironically, Enlil means “one of the group” and the modern group is attempting to paralyse (another word for evil) individuals into conformity. So what about “Eve”? Well, he is nothing like the conformist interpretation. That’s right, he. Compared to grisly Neanderthal the butchest human men look relatively feminine and, honestly, some are prettier than Neanderthal women. No, lipstick doesn’t help. Trust me. About 125,000 years ago human was created as an unauthorised fusion of Ciakar reptilian, Atlantean (from Atlantis) and “Australopithecus” genetics in different measures (i.e. there are numerous human races).

cernunnos-bust6-US-WU75712A4Celtic Hu Gadam (The mighty one) is often depicted as a reptilian (Pteroid) wild horned, rodent faced beast that traditionally heralds from the “underworld”. Hierarchically, the Pteroids are more senior to Ciakars (of which there are copious types, some not looking even remotely reptilian, incidentally!) and they had the relationship with Version Six Atlantean human via the Drakkon (dragons). In fact, the Pteroids were possibly involved in the creation of Earth made Ciakars. Technically we are the first version of human, but as there is no word to represent human with absence of “hu”, Altlanteans and other (sometimes vaguely) “human looking” types have been given a de facto, colloquial, categorisation.

The unauthorised creation of humans had a dramatic effect on Earth politics and was one of the factors leading to the 18,000 years’ war. So dangerous was the affront on this incubus species, the Atlanteans swiftly volunteered to move us off planet out of relative harm’s way. Reasons for Atlantean support were complex and not merely related to harvesting their kindred stock. Millions of years earlier the Ciakar “chameleon” reptilian had been created by dragons using Tyrannosaur DNA, Pteroid “man” in combination with samples donated by Version Five “human” (the Atlantean predecessors) from their gene pool. That was the first attempt at breeding a local (Earth bound) humanoid-reptilian. Many million years ago the dragons were given rights to “human” DNA as retribution after the disastrous war that destroyed Maldek (their home planet) and ended the dinosaurs. With it they made the Pteroids. It was these that worked with the Ciakar-reptilians to cause the circumstances (i.e. our creation) that led to complications with the Annunaki which was one of the reasons we were moved off planet 120,000 years ago.

hqdefaultAccording to the Epic of Gilgamesh, sometimes called the “Sumerian Kings’ List”, Earth ownership has been documented as calendar of regents. The details are a great enigma for atheist science as some “kings” reigned for 10,000’s of years. Of course no individual metabolic organism can survive “intact” over 1000 years in the material plane so, clearly, ancient texts referred to higher planes. Detail discussed in The Beauty of Existence Decoded, our physical plane offers a very limited bandwidth, thus, from the materialist-atheist-science perspective, (most of) the higher realms “don’t exist”. Our pineal gland can act as a bridge or conduit between planes, though, without activation, many characters central to the Epic of Gilgamesh plot would be obsolete; are “fantasy” (in the atheist-materialist sense). Beings that live 10,000’s years have enormous “genetic IQ’s” and would comfortably reside in dimensions five or greater (i.e. relativity free light realms). Some of the characteristics/properties/”dividers” of the dimension realms are also covered in The Beauty of Existence Decoded.

Annual500In other words those “kings” did not exist by modern atheist-materialist governed definition. Instead, Atlantean “human” acted as a bridge for the living experience of greater powers and, although they were advanced of our physical frequency (in the way we experience today), they would still have been relatively material. In fact they needed to be (physical) as they built a dreadful reputation for being slave drivers of the lowest moral ethics (by human conscience determined standards). I feel I have left so much important information out that comprehensions may be inhibited. Thankfully, everything will be in A New World Order when I release it. For instance, there were two very chaotic periods of history resulting in giant cosmic wars 2,300,000 and 750,000 years ago that deserve thorough inspection to understand the complex state of affairs 200,000 years ago. I have not worked out after which Great War Version Five human was downgraded to put Atlantis man into effect. Hopefully by the time the book is published my guides will have revealed the truth. I can say that the powers ended up abusing the hell out of Adam, Homo erectus that loved the African plains (I should advise modern Africa was two separate continents then and I am referring to the southernmost landmass).

Stonehenge2Everything was very different. What we call the Pacific Ocean today was substantively water free, then. Yet much of our Europe was submerged. Readers must also appreciate that (moon) Falla dumped an enormous amount of ice (which eventually melts) on our planet after the circa 12,800BC catastrophe that ended Atlantis, so the land/sea ratio was much higher prior to this. Indeed after the real “polar switch” in 10,583BC which literally saw the Earth’s crust detach from the core, “slip” and shake the surface contents like a “paper weight snow scene” also played a big hand in casting the modern Earth topology. Not a pretty sight though. How anything could have survived that, well, God only knows! Yet, the Mayan/Incan doomsday calendar “wheel of the sun” was chipped just prior to that catalyst and Stonehenge is a relic of millions of years old spirituality which tapped into Earth’s essence. Nevertheless, very few “humans” (colloquial categories included) would have wandered the planet prior to the Mars exodus between 32,000 and 31,000BC, say. Even numbers then (post exodus) were miniscule compared to today’s bulging populations. With, at some periods, only 100’s or low 1000’s of humans on the planet it should be no wonder physical evidence is scant indeed.

cosmic war

Only after the spectacular departure of the Annunaki around 33,000BC was it deemed safe for humans to return. Archaeological evidence suggests small numbers of natural humans (as opposed to Atlanteans) came here up to 20,000 years prior. The reasons are too bizarre for sane explanations, so that truth will wait for A New World Order. Other than proto-physical Lemurians, the mystical Asiatic Lumerians, a smattering of Atlantean “industrialists”, prior to the Mars exodus (after 32,000BC) the planet was inhabited by (or infested with) apes – Homo erectus (Adam). Some varieties could talk (although our science claims otherwise) but their mindset was very different to ours. The character of the Neanderthal face is unmistakable. I see elements of it in all races (but not everyone). Ironically, or perhaps not so, the greatest prevalence of those traits can be found in the Semites.

impish 'grey beings'There was a population explosion around 160,000BC when “southern” Africa had become an ecological disaster. The Lemurians may have been forced to intervene, but the continent had become extremely dangerous as Neanderthal is a “thinking being” (though not on the same wavelength as human), physically very powerful and can be extremely violent, if necessary. A technological intervention would have certainly damaged the planet, so they seem to have found a psychological solution. Archaeological evidence proposes Neanderthals had music, spirituality and knowledge of the cosmos by 100,000BC (which, in fact, is more likely to be 120,000BC and prior, given the 18,000 years’ war). I know there was a renaissance period about 80,000 years ago and it was after that Lumerian conjuring mystics settled on Earth. Yes-butThey, of course, had lived alongside Atlanteans, natural humans, placid, affectionate reptilian bipeds, child-like Grey Beings and domesticated Neanderthals on Mars, prior. It was, contrary to the Romanised stigma, the planet of peace at that time.

Well that was a silly idea. I thought I could cram 450,000 years of Earth history on one humble blog page. It was never going to happen! So, I have decided I will soon scope a very rough account for the period 102,000BC to 10,583BC as a future post. My work commitments cease after next week and will afford me a month break. There should be plenty of spare hours to devote to this saga. In the meantime keep well & see you presently.

On From Peter Maxwell Slattery

On From Peter Maxwell Slattery

Readers may or may not be aware of the global exo-political resource Peter Maxwell Slattery’s internet video channel. He has an international reputation and invites speakers from all over the world to contribute. Many have inherent cosmic connections and I would recommend this information to any serious follower.

A while ago, Peter kindly invited me to interview and here is that segment:

We live in a linear world which has been defined by materialists. The current annoying trend is reductionism. Its popular messiah is Richard Dawkins, though numbers tried to mimic Charles Darwin’s evolutionary determinism over the years.

Devils against free thought side by side

Devils against free thought side by side

Neatly conforming to Pharisaic principles, spiritually has branched into two opposing streams; hybrid atheism and New Age faux Gnosticism. Whereas both “camps” offer occasional philological gems, neither comprehends inherent existence nor draw from annuls of cyclic knowledge that craft what it really is to “be”.

Just as with the dogma that supports cropped perception, our reality is an illusion determined by righteous viewpoints. Because the baseline is in many ways constructed by mainstream Medias and other influential perception-shaping resources, many would struggle to recognise the truth even if it bit them. As for my background in the literary arts, I initially began writing a book series titled “A Brief History of Human Conscience” but have yet to complete a single segment. It is a massive project that will comprise at least fifteen books; some tomes in their own right. Back in 2012 I took a diversion. This led me to a path which promised a new writing project and I call that series to be “Dimensions, Deceptions & Demons” (DDD).

Ten books are planned and one has been released. Before I discuss the introductory volume, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, here is my schedule for anticipated releases. Book two, “A New World Order”, is 80% of the way through the first rewrite and will be fully rewritten again. Going back over old content activates previously dormant new knowledge. The advantage of this method is the reader gains much more solid insight. Cyclic truths might be compared with random glimpses of light, say. Once “inspired”, how does one “fit” information into our long corrupt reality bubble?

“A New World Order” will seem something like a sci-fi adventure stretching back billions of years. Even so all my books are for serious minded people and this one is not going to be another Harry Potter. Nevertheless I have penned an entertaining short story to put everyone in the mood. Check out “Life on Mars; inspired by Harry Potter“.

Harry Potter

Harry Potter

“The Birth of Hum-an-ity” – DDD series book three, will follow. This may well be judged the most controversial as I explain who (or “what”) we, hu-mans, are. All the information can be found in the Bible (using the Hebrew text) and other ancient sources, so, rightly, I include extended textual form criticisms to validate my revelations. Conclusions will startle readers.

Because of my special understanding of the dragon bloodlines, the project was originally going to be a single expansive volume dealing with the Draco. Thus, it does not need a giant mind to work out why book four is titled “What are the Draco?” This is an exploration of genetics and variations (some impacting our development). Blended with real history giving origins clarity, readers will find treasure on every page. An important emphasis on the character differences and perspectives of the different genetic types is explored, but never judged from the warped human sense of righteousness. It would be fair to say, unsurprisingly, many of these species look at life in an entirely alien fashion. I guess that is why they are called aliens! Book five reveals the higher Annunaki bloodlines and the title, “Ba’al, Drakkon and the Spheres of Influence”, gives away the hierarchical genetic order. Some of the content is devoted to energetic resonances managed via DNA “exchanges”.

Next in sequence will the volume titled “Strange Times and Out-of-this-world Technologies”. Book six mostly deals with extraordinary Draco technological advancements. Some of these are of an absolutely transcendental nature that is so far adrift of conventional science they are hard to explain. Book seven, “Beyond the Draco – Connections to the Other Players; an Overview”, is going to be highly prized as this is where I begin defining the most significant other species groups that interconnect with the dragon bloodlines. The Zeta Grey Beings feature, but many other, lesser or unknown varieties are also revealed. Readers can anticipate this being a mighty tome! Its partner volume promises to be even weightier as it deals with what’s left. Book eight, “More of the Other Players: Extra, Inner and Unknown or Unclassified Terrestrials”, is dedicated to surprises!

The final two parts will cover interconnecting networks of power competing over control of Earth. I shall also try and present the shape of things to come as best as I am able. Timelines for release dates are expected to span years between each new part as none are going to be trivial. It is an ambitious project that requires faithful support. The best way to show your appreciation is by purchasing book one or making a donation.

Relational cyclic modelling

Relational cyclic modelling

“An Introduction to Dimensions, Deceptions & Demons” is a relatively short but uncompromisingly powerful read. Reduced to twenty seven pages (to be “printer friendly) and under 20,000 words, aside from the preface, it is a single chapter. Breaking the illusory reality bubble (I discussed earlier) there is no padding and information is over ninety per cent fresh and new. It has already attracted a vocal following of resilient fans, but doubtless materialist critics skulk. As no other books have decoded existence and given life clarity, everyone should read it.

In addition, without a deep understanding of the cosmos, true spirituality, how things started, the relationship between sub-atomic matter and the soul network, it is pointless engaging in serious discussions about anything exo-political. Therefore, The Beauty of Existence Decoded paves the way forward. As new books are released, readers will discover each part links with the next so to drop one piece of the puzzle would logically encourage the potential for failed comprehension and flawed conclusions. Mainstream illusion have relied on populating the void between intelligence and knowledge with make-believe and I would hate to follow suit even inadvertently.

Each book will contain unique and new information; some almost completely original. Therefore donators have the opportunity to empower humanity in my support (i.e. if you want this project to be successful, donate well). Should the reverse be the case, then, at least, you know your true purpose.

The first of my book series is available for a donation of not less than US$10. For clarity, this is not a “fixed price” and there is no ceiling to donation amounts. Contributions keep the writing project afloat.