There is an eternal paradox best expressed by the ever raging covert conflict that divides Gnostics apparent from those in all but name Pharisaic Zionists. It is the left against the right which inevitably morphs into right versus wrong or wrong versus right (dependent on standpoints as to best matriculation of order) warfare. Overt skirmishes over outright control sadly obscure bitter truths that might reveal a more deep-rooted historic progression encapsulated by harmonisations of alien human factions. Because of these totalitarian obsessions, potential for communion resolution has been all but squandered. The major hinderance to progress is the human “network” in its entirety and without exception, fears the unknown to some degree. Consequentially, a rickety platform that generally supports materialist philosophy universally governs acceptable qualification of perceptive functionality predetermining machinations of existence. Notable side effect, when common expressions such as sacred, spiritual and holy are in play, there is no comprehension as to their power, for they have no power in the material world. In this respect Voodoo, by example, transforms as something spooky and unseemly; a con game to lure the susceptible. True divinity effectively gathers dust, joining boxed tinsel and other baubles discarded by spiteful political racketeers.
In short, were we to visibly wind the clock back to distant ages gone by, faith that had place and purpose in society then would be seen to be lost today. Our ancestors have been dishonoured and mocked by this modern trend towards absolutism. Few now could be persuaded to believe trivialised harvest festivals used to act as feats of graciousness (perhaps summarised by “Jesus’” feeding of the five thousand parable). Far away from our aimless rural social gatherings, they should be remembered as final bastions of social communion rite. Reflective of the zealous determination to win at all cost is a dedication towards xenophobic attack of strangers. Communion is now replaced by standards that aggravate or synthesise popularised fear of the other (amply exploited by the latest arguably phoney virus melodrama). The void that once championed compassion and brotherhood is firmly under the merciless stranglehold of commercial trading interests. Tumultuous sways of financial currencies exclusively dictate terms to a modern world which revolves around the worship of anything of substance.
Thus, anything that isn’t material is worthless and that is why, back in 1984, pop star Madonna could entrance the hearts of fans under spell of Material Girl. Indeed, the tangential path to faithfulness or enlightenment was surrendered long ago. Now it provides sanctuary only to lost ones who (in their zeal) make easy prey for Moses’ agitators. Today that which is real is solid, but did anyone notice the word real was created from tenuous origins negotiated through partnership of cosmic expressions “ri” and “al”. Real should mean “spiritual manifestation of the divine almighty” but, of course, “progress” proffers distortion. How could those trinkets the Pharisees love to brag about and parade before us be construed as anything divine? For example, the biblical “Old Testament” regularly admonishes the “worship of idols”. No solid reasons are provided. Practices are forbidden in preference towards dedication below a great, “almighty” God (which some argue was Pharaoh Akhenaten’s idea). Fingers scandalously gesture towards a notorious Vedic (Aryan-Slav) golden calf. This offending culprit is regularly depicted as a metamorphosis of the posthumous deity Baal (more correctly, Ba’Al) though it actually signified ever present gnosis in nature. Besides, other than Isaiah’s tumultuously negative account, we know nothing about the character.
Vile accusation against them overlooked, fetchingly, when combined as presented, Ba’al’s dual syllables of humble demeanour offer the key to a doorway concealing cherished suppressed truths (or why would Isaiah have needed to do a hatchet job on the deity?). Thus, in context, “Ba” supplants praise or bless in cosmic tongue. It should be noted structure of use is always situation relevant, so bless might substitute for blessed or blessing dependent on placement circumstances. When teamed with “Al” (shorthand for almighty God) in the subject, resulting expression would configure as “blessed lord of all” in English. Nevertheless, third party usage prepares for different inflections. Simply put, from the objective [perspective] “blessed lord of all” best corresponds with “praise this lord of all” or “praise God”. Accordingly, would not repeated utterance of Ba’al amply suffice as worship dedication? Perhaps it is no accident that Amen (Amon) superseded the tribute (though incorrectly alliterated in modern day prayer) because it was apparently Akhenaten’s chosen name for God and as such, some argue, commenced monotheism. Accountants noticeably influenced Babylonian culture of the era.
Related to the topic, a prior article of mine discussed the birth of Phoenician peoples, who were remnants of the Canaanites post exodus. In conjunction, I explained that after a vacuum was left when [physical] reptilian overlords “evacuated” for no apparent reasons, some brethren (who had been under their jurisdiction) “escaped” to the wilderness (misrepresented as wilderness years in biblical Genesis). These deserters (or derelicts, to coin the vernacular) would later become known as Philistines (man power servicing the great Greek and Roman civilisations) and then Pharisees (who came into their own subsequent to Roman capture of Judea). Desertion of the holy land followed a “coup d’état” against divinity that is subliminally documented in biblical Genesis’ Cain and Abel story. To set the scene Adam (analogical material existence possibly from “feed voraciously”) produced two sons. The first, Abel (or Ab-El) would have normally stood for “almighty God, the father (of all)”, but I think in relevant context here means “gnosis”. The other son, Cain signifies “circumvent obligation”. “Ca” is the ancient word for “agreement” (i.e. contract) and untranslatable “iN” (or ‘N) is best substituted by avoid, waver or deny. Per the storyline, Abel is metaphorically killed by Cain in the same manner “Ba’al” was pathologically forbidden by proto Pharisees. Incidentally, Pharisee originally meant usurper, which descriptively compares well with “deny authority” (Greek idios, stem of idiot).
“Deny authority” is a possible translation variable of Cain. Does the Cain and Abel story symbolise Pharisaic (idiotic) murder of [what is now referred to as] Gnosticism?
So, though none of the “prophets” bothered to illuminate the fact, Ba’al was a worship cry made by dedicates. In fairness, record is not helped by rigors attached to effective adaptation of chronicler’s Hebrew, which is an abbreviation of cosmic tongue. The full version provides a much more extensive alphabet and I am inclined to determine that Hebrew and Phoenician lettering systems were selectively procured from the complete resource. Transliteration issues aside, greater attention to purpose behind the outlaw of worship of idols could have been tendered by the prophets, but it wasn’t. And it wasn’t tendered for conspiratorial reasons; in my opinion possibly the greatest of all ancient conspiracies which (in part) covers up truth about human heritage. It is amazing how the universe synchronises. At the time of writing, per her request, I had been advising a student over translation value of the ancient name Nefertari. Route to discovery inadvertently exploded innocent secrets disguising why idolatry is deemed despicable. Egyptologists (sic) cannily claim the popular queen’s address equated to “beautiful companion” in English, which, I must add, has no bearing on truth.
Exploring detail preserved by Nefertari, standalone syllable meanings are as follows. “Ne” is to be purposely born or delivered. “Fer” is messenger (making variant Lu-chi-fer the collar ruffling “angel of light”) which (in certain grammatical circumstances) can double as delivered message. “Ri” has been appraised before (check my Tamarian article). Pronounced “Re” (ray) it substitutes for essential divinity. (Covered by the same publication) my assessment of “ta” was desperately lacking. At the time of writing I was at a loss for progression. Whittling down fundamentals from larger expression “tapu” (buried in Maori script), I hastily concluded “ta” must signify sacred, but it turns out this was only partially correct. More precisely, bizarrely, the word refers to skin or, in the interest of thoroughness, God’s skin. Not relevant to investigations supporting revelations over the Tamarian, I did not progress with full translation, but now, for those that care, “pu” might best convey facilitator or instrument of faith. Anyway here’s how Nefertari assists in exposing that prophetic Ba’al conspiracy. Inside “ta” (God’s skin) you will discover “ba” (blessed one).
My door is always open when I’m available, as my students will testify. Recently someone else approached me with an interest in applying for one of my scintillating Skype consultations. Per communications, the individual in question used a pet name that affectionately payed homage to the drakkon. Exploration of this fits quite well below this essay’s topic, but with no sure detailed knowledge of associated spiritual genetic hierarchies, discussion in relation to the human extra-terrestrial is futile. Therefore, before I broach the drakkon independently, I think is worth initially delving into relevant grouped hierarchies. In that regard, I presume most would logically approach supposed sacred texts (as their first port of call) for inspiration but, given the overall poor record of religion, would equally imagine many may be loathed to take findings that seriously. Additionally, considering the all too numerous examples that demonstrate where temptation towards biased distortion has glaringly afflicted prominent journalists of the modern era, can ancients be substantiated as any more reliable or truthful?
The bible, by modern standards, was written in an odd, chronologically haphazard manner. Even so, for those willing to take the challenge, there are many obscured gems beckoning discovery, lightly cloaked truths in plain sight so to speak. One such example is the “concept” paraphrased as Elohim, which dictionaries translate (from Hebrew) to mean God. More precisely, Elohim expresses as “heavenly God beings” in English (oh, an abbreviation of loh is the same value as lah in Allah). Taking the “strangeness theme” a step forward, enigma blossoms in the knowledge that there is no discernible Hebrew equivalent for [singular] God being. Thus, Elohim theoretically, at least, vouches for the consideration standalone group hierarchies (of which there are many) may discern “higher existence” (which Aristotle persuaded was adrift of the mundane). Identically structured Hebrew word Goyim means “nationals” which, interestingly, purports no singular version either, because in this case Goy (nation) provides “the umbrella” for nationals. Multitudes correspondingly build nations.
Rising above human genetic strata unseen custodians cast a precarious spiral route to God. To be clear, the use of the term “God” here doesn’t refer to that rotund bearded gentleman who apparently languishes in stoic clouds, permanently just beyond reach of living onlookers. God, as exampled, actually categorises groups that were bestowed with creative genetic keys (which, contrary to current political-science opinion, are located in quantum light). Under such terms, our genes would defer as “property” of these higher entities, most of whom we cannot connect with (directly). The highest rung of the genetic path belongs to an order that is collectively known as Anunaki (which means “God’s divine gateway providing feminine spirituality”). Perceptive should immediately discern the obvious here. Anunaki and Elohim are different naming conventions that adhere to identical hierarchies (be it the latter is rather vague). The sensational “other” Hebrew name for God YHWH (normally paraphrased [Greek] Yahweh or [Roman] Jehovah) ironically appears to identify a subordinate entity; which may be Pteroid. Irony strikes twice here because Pteroids are fiercely independent and, therefore, do not habitually adopt collective status. Paradox is expanded in the knowledge that they were custodians of the developmental hybridisation of a so-called reptilian order that emerging. Canaanite authorities paid homage to. Sephardic Jews adopted their masters’ “title” out of respect for reptilian governance (conventions outlined in detail towards the end of this essay). Their overlords regarded themselves as a corporate class faction and implications of this will be revealed shortly.
Posted at the pinnacle of the pyramid that encases humanity sit the Anunaki. Whilst they have been described as occasioned sea monsters, that information is incorrect. Choosing no particular form, they in fact perennially adopt non-manifest status. Confusion reigns over status of their theoretically manifest versions. According to ancient texts these have routinely appeared to show off grotesque body attributes. Questionable gargoyles maybe, these of course represent various parts of Ba’al (discussed in the earlier introduction, so I won’t bother revisiting old ground). Suffice to say, individual traits making the group are as distinctively characterised by names that are elaborate as they are deliberate. Unfortunately few of these identities (if any at all) have been correctly ascribed per human records. For instance, fearsome Wassu-Sassu surrogates an endearing reflection of the aghast onlooker’s attempts to come to terms with what they had witnessed. The name itself has no bearing on truth (beyond conveying possible vestige in cosmic script). Most authentic alliterations I would imagine would be beyond human vocal range anyway. In addition, manifestation as such occupies colossal cosmic bandwidth, compared to our puny existence. Justifiably, it turns out historical Ba’al resided (and probably resides) in arenas disassociated from spectral reality and could not “be” in [what we term] physicality.
In effect that which is mundanely material belongs to a “self-contained” spiritually devoid density bracket (speculated in Aristotle’s unmoved movers’ theory) specifically created to maximise progressive advantage from pioneering genetic real estate
Lucifer (angel delivering knowledge), agent of the Anunaki, was one of the significant driving forces behind the enterprise. By all accounts, his innovation went against the grain, but no one else could find a better (i.e. more stable) paradigm. Thus the Luciferian system became authority. This authority incorporated a brand new style of natural balance (often miscategorised as “survival”) that was cultivated by purposely designated dragons. Ancient Greek affiliated word drakkon takes the object singular (in the subject drakkos is correct vernacular), but terminology is clearly based on unverified prehistoric sources. Cosmic tongue provides for an identically voiced word that is representative of spiritual league of dragons if it were known. Identically to Ba’al, individual members of the league take specific personalised names which define attributes. So when revisiting the Sephardim, who were modelled on the dragons’ golden child Tyrannosaurus Rex, we can ascertain plausibly sincere motives justifying adherence to group status. Primarily, they pay homage to dragons in their collective attempt to emulate mastery (which is ultimately deity). Naturally competitive, they also presume rights equal (though perhaps not shared status) to the highest Gods. Fabled (according to certain Babylonian texts) “marriages” with strategic Anunaki assets imply partnerships have been forged (investigative findings were reported in this article).
We might well ask how does all this implicate the human extra-terrestrial? However, to answer sufficiently, a little more background would be useful. I did introduce the idea providing notional real (though not physical) Gods as custodians of wide catalogue of genetic attributes supported by source DNA located (again, not physically) in quantum light (contradicting opinions of our investigative sciences) which acts as “anchor” to physical existence. Understanding the lengthy historic development of associated human DNA pathways prepares a crucial step towards exposing extra-terrestrial origins. I have reluctantly quoted Alex Collier in the past. Identified by the Genome Project under unspecific terms, he once cited twenty-six markers that promise evidence of alien man. Though Collier’s opinions appear to validate my mission here, I don’t necessarily agree with them. For instance, the Genome Project has done to more prove it doesn’t comprehend DNA than benefit from research outpourings. Chemical reactions empowered by convoluted amino acid chains are symptoms only. Far from validating, poor or misguided analysis is better inclined to obfuscate causes. Currently the Genome Project more or less entirely relies on guesswork to plot implications of tagged processes. Delving into quantum, matters become far worse. Atoms are given “fields” (often erroneously) that attempt to categorise properties in a similar manner, perhaps, that our senses are calculated. Per proscribed etiquette, DNA supports values that are both infinitely flexible and inflexible. We can demonstrate this in senses. Vision, for example, is not x-ray, but unrestricted access has been provided to colour view within spectral (rainbow) parameters, etc..
Collier’s determination is made more valid insomuch as the map to discovering alien man has to be present in genetics, but he does not select correct coordinates. We don’t need the Genome Project to highlight one staring anatomic anomaly present in human. I am not the only one who’s written that, next to us, no other organism (located on this planet) possesses a cerebral cortex. It is a feature unique to humanity. If we are to believe planetary surface life evolutionary development began with amoebas, the clue is surely even more poignant. Questions like why didn’t other animals adopt the cerebral cortex (which facilitates extraordinary intellect) (?) spring to mind. Is evolutionary environmental advantage driven improvement “selective” and why (were we to presume steps are “random”)? Most pertinent, the cerebral cortex furbishes human with power over all other creatures. Thus putting standard science perspective under scrutiny, that haunting esoteric passage in biblical Genesis citing various genetic “trees” is destined to perplex. It is as if we never belonged here at all. In fact, could we go as far to consider the fabled Garden of Eden may have been located on a different planet to dear old Earth? Was “God” to be truly situated perennially out of reach “in the heavens” somewhere, he surely might also intermittently rest on various astral bodies, host to all, but permanent resident of none. Was the Genesis passage to be considered representative of historic account, no formal Garden of Eden location (that perfectly matches attributes described) has ever been discovered on Earth. Some postulate that the Ganges or Amazon rivers may have supported paradise oases, but where is evidence of those deadly sentinels devoted to disbarring riff-raff?
There is something that has happened recently that suggests certain elements of the mainstream authority (occasionally coined “corridors of power”) know some truth about human-alien ancestry. Unlikely information eavesdropper is none other than industrialist Elon Musk. I thank one of my male students for drawing my attention to him. SpaceX (a company Musk heads) has built a galactic shuttle craft (inspired by iPhone or destined to venture to that enigmatic like named theoretical planet?) in cooperation with NASA. Only a few years back, Musk was bragging about the potential to create human automations through reengineered DNA. Lo and behold his space shuttle has aptly assumed the name “dragon” (dragons being primary owners of our gene stocks). I feel sure that in case in the know onlookers dare consider this a harmless coincidence, the ship was provided a plastic dinosaur mascot named “Dino” to ram the truth home. Let us not overlook the fact the dragons’ prized creation monument (under old order) was the dinosaur (notably Tyrannosaurus Rex, which ain’t no chicken). They were the original gene masters (who provided for all the surface life templates, prior to invasions of inner dwelling creatures after Maldek’s destruction).
Musk, brainchild of the SpaceX venture, also has a great passion for altering human genetics. Currently (at the time of writing) we languish beneath soft tyranny belying a fake or not as described “Coronavirus epidemic”. In line with vicious political strategy, even though vaccines merely philosophise speculative risk management against disease reoccurring, upping the ante, scientists now determine certain formulas are stable enough to facilitate predictive medications (or elixirs) as well. In other words, when unknown diseases come along predictive medications are presumed to offer a reliable enough vanguard (to warrant risk of unchecked use). Acting against Coronavirus, akin gene altering compounds are being tested. Let’s reassemble those other pieces of the puzzle again to clarify we are all on the same page here. Elon Musk boasted about creating a human automaton (the pliable slave) not too long back. He is the CEO of SpaceX (Planet X is allegedly the haunt of the Anunaki, our highest genetic authority), which manufactured a space shuttle (under NASA’s banner) called “dragon”. Dragons are the gene masters that posthumously “own” sections of human DNA (what I wouldn’t give for a drop of dragon’s blood). They previously “worked for” the Anunaki. Musk’s space shuttle has been launched while Coronavirus propaganda promising gene altering “protection” is in full swing.
I have illustrated the steps down the genetic path from Anunaki to human on many other occasions. It is vital to run through them again (though presented differently this time) to add weight to this investigation. Around 400 million (give or take 50 million) years ago dragons visited the Earth while prospecting for new real estate. If traditional opinion is to be upheld, they originated from the Alpha Draconis star system. However, a dragon-like entity led civilisations on Tiamat (Earth was built from the larger planet’s debris more than a billion years ago). Scientists speculate the first major dinosaurs were created about 280 million years ago and, to me, their figure work seems plausible enough. Even so, prior to dragon scout parties’ visitation, Earth hosted unrelated life forms that may have mostly been squeezed out by the incoming regime. Technically, this makes all life alien to Earth but for the fact many species today have distant inner planetary origins (denying molten core theory). Whether beginnings of inner dwellers were attached to Earth is up for debate.
In light of their chosen dinosaur path, to 100 million years old dragons’ notional development of human being in genetic context would have been inconceivable. Their idea of optimum man, we already know, provided for a killing machine. Any creature within earshot of one of those beasts would have done well to survive. The only real threat to T-Rex was environmental and this ultimately did destroy him. 100 million years ago in fact occasioned fateful interaction with Sirian explorers, serial planet breakers, who would eventually ruin wyvern paradise too. It is perhaps a great irony (or was it karmic retribution?) that Sirian ancestors were the ones that destroyed Tiamat following a dispute with that incarnation’s “dragon”. New wars between Mars and Earth brewed and percolated over several million years.
Located on the route to Jupiter, Maldek was a small planet that hosted resting dragon affiliated battalions and had a reputation for licentiousness (something Sirians cannot abide). Naturally temptation proved too great for the planet destroyers, but there was consequential cosmic revenge. Blowback from Maldek’s untimely destruction (which I’m told was activated by of some sort of chain reaction) wiped out all civilisations (in their entirety) on Mars (suggesting intense meteor showers pelted the surface for days on end). In a sense it was lucky decent numbers of Sirians were stationed on ships, otherwise their genus might have been rendered extinct. Earth was shielded to some degree so responding bombardments weren’t aggressive enough to prompt permanent injury to dinosaurs. Demise of larger body types was actually caused by incapability to withstand dramatic changes in temperature after Earth shifted from somewhere in the vicinity of where Venus orbits the sun today to its current position (which dummies the old Mars orbital path). Mars broke Earth’s velocity but was shunted outwards by the collision.
The responding species vacuum prompted radical rethinking by genetic planners. Dragons had “won” the war, but at an enormous toll
“Inherited” bounty appears to have included license to manufacture Sirian DNA, although none was used in initial attempts at reengineering man. Consequentially an abridged version of Pterodactyl or, to be more precise, a mammalian variation of the late period dinosaur became the genetic link to new man, “Pteroid”. Its historic portrayal is probably closest represented by characterisations of the mythical Satyr. In consideration that Gnostic illustrations are plausibly accurate, doubtlessly some were flighted. Given dragons and Pterodactyls were winged, progression of design in Pteroid does not challenge realms of fathomable reason. However, there may have been spatial genetic variation across species boundaries accounting for flighted and flightless types. Interestingly body format was eerily similar to the likes of an entity that existed billions of years ago (characterising “R”), long prior to Earth’s creation. I find the idea Neanderthal was Pteroid’s direct ancestor natural (even though genetic birth of new man is formally dated at roughly 300 thousand years ago). Generally speaking, Pteroid would have been closer in appearance to an oversized werewolf (is that where the myths evolved from?), but, to reiterate, I think there may have been considerable species diversity (presenting memory of all sorts of strange creatures). Hu Gaddam (Pteroid’s Alta ego) is usually depicted as a classical horned Satyr.
Whether dragons felt their Pterodactyl man would remain current “forever” is open for discussion. Spiritual beings ascend and (if it wasn’t) akin knowledge should have been factored into calculations. Time limits on Pteroid’s reign became apparent in excess of five million years ago and, as far as I can ascertain, stakeholders left strategies for remedy rather late. This prompted an almighty rush to engineer potential successors. In the confusion dragons were fortuitously presented a new window of opportunity though. After the demise of the large dinosaurs, they were in a constant state of mourning and couldn’t envisage disturbing the peace with view to resurrecting prized Tyrannosaur, but, by now, millions of years later, enough time had passed to allow them to reflect and move on. So they lovingly embraced fortune, gleefully conspiring over necessary mechanics required to usher in a Phoenician return of mighty T-Rex. It was not going to be easy. Whilst the ultimate demise of the large dinosaurs took as long as ten million years, their DNA had so radically altered directly after the initial shock, compared to source, even the earliest revivable set point was unrecognisable. This left the dragons with no effective preserved base catalogue to work off and, anyway, circumstances had changed so much rejuvenated old order was probably going to prove an impossibility. They were going to need and did turn to external agents (“aliens” if you will) to assist with manufacturing adapted “hybrid” source stock.
In practice, though Hu Gaddam has been honoured as creator of Sephardim (the final product), dragons blocked his actual involvement (beyond paying lip service) with proceedings. Fully alien Lyrans (who acted as ancient protectorate Earthly kings for a long period) were given unrestricted license over project management. Hybrid batches were destined to accrue complex mixes. Whereas some Pteroid was present in all compounds, it was the diminutive element. Other materials used were sourced from hydrogen breathing external agents who were of “reptilian” appearance. Alex Collier speculates these may have been gathered from associated planetary systems of the Bootes’ constellation. Even factoring genetic balancing from Sirian DNA components, Sephardim should be classed as more alien than terrestrial. In addition, because they did not belong (per spectral arrangements pertaining to Earth heritage beneath Luciferian standards), Lyran “contamination” of batch compounds severely vexed Anunaki proponents and this caused some friction with the dragons (who remained technically commissioned to act on their behalf). Interestingly the use of Anunaki-Sirian DNA in human batch compounds later angered Pteroid (under the euphemism “Yahweh” in biblical accounts) even though we are quintessential versions of Pleiadian (teachers at Atlantis emphasised by the Greek God Hermes). Why specifically Sirian intellect caused so much angst is an unanswered enigma.
Whilst, from the bureaucratic perspective, genetics had been undeniably tainted, Anunaki consensus was pragmatic enough to concede that the Lyran/dragon partnership had done an extraordinary job in recreating miniature Tyrannosaurus Rex. T-Rex, of course, wasn’t the limit of that enterprise. Innumerable different body types were enlisted. To complicate matters further, reptilians don’t always choose to keep their natural birth bodies. At a particularly age, per local rite of passage, social rules permit “veto” of nature. Moving life force to a “synthetic” purpose built body container does not come without hazards. All developmental memory is squandered (something Simon Parkes has stressed in interviews); thus each virgin adult physique begins at a stage roughly equating to baby. The “shock” is multiplied because incoming (knowledge) mind remains as it was, complete and unaltered with conflicting muscle memory. Extended transition periods exacerbate gaps between physical and mental worlds cultivating prolonged frustration, somewhat reminding me of the tedious steps car injured go through in their rehabilitation efforts. Indeed, I would imagine some may well give up in preference to returning to their original birth bodies, but have no formal confirmation of whether this is possible.
Sephardic “brands” were cultivated a few million years ago. From around that time until around 800,000BC Lyrans ruled the planet surface. Their tenure was abruptly halted after violent battles with emerging Lemurians (apparently evacuating a flooded inner Earth). Lyrans were forced inwards (but I think to one of the other “shelves” that had been traditionally regarded as too hot for habitation). Status humiliation surrounding their defeat eventually led to a change of guard over reptilian communities. Even so, Lyrans may have stepped down from leadership, but will always be viewed as overall “spiritual matriarchs” (a point subliminally affirmed by Simon Parkes). For the most part (until 19,000BC) the planet surface ended up supporting a variety of humanoid civilisations post exodus. Lemurians themselves, according to Apache, Australian aborigine and Inuit legends, were extra-terrestrials (who had possibly originally evacuated from a planet located within reach of the dog star). Very human in appearance, some are much taller than us and display noticeably box shaped heads. Characteristic dark “furrowed” brow and trademark coat-hanger shoulders set them apart from other humanoid types. Hair neatly tied into some style of strange knot, males would regularly don the loincloth (vaguely reminiscent of an oversized nappy).
Though they were revered as holy men, to dispel any confusion, comparably “sacred” sandaled Sirian monks routinely dressed in rough “sack cloth” tunics which would have been usually tied at the waist by coarse rope. Interestingly, both stereotypes have been adopted as human tribal role models over the ages
Hierarchical path structures adapting extra-terrestrial human are quite convoluted. Our Indian and Aborigine peoples preserved Lemurian DNA culture. Chinese Asiatic and certain African genes demonstrate the highest concentration of expressive reptilian qualities (which, I must say, thanks to the gutter press, are deeply misunderstood). Other aspects of the African genome were apparently fuelled by an independent latecomer, so maybe white supremacists’ arguments stressing associated races are “less evolved” than others may not be as paradoxical inaccurate as Pharisaic determinants would wish. Any consideration dedicated to crafting that epitome of multi-culturalism; a uniform “human race”, may well enflame ignorance, but primarily corrupts truth in plain sight. For Christ’s sake even the pedestrian Genome Project has been able to categorise six fundamental Caucasian “batches” benchmarked back to differing date range origins, so how does that make for human race uniformity? Of course, intelligent know the notion of oneness is politicised bullshit that progresses Globalism and its partnering Pharisees’ welfare dependence “people management” model. Associated social security, in that respect, boils down to labour hire insurance. Accountants are so obsessed with fulfilling the grand plan, even sickness is limited to budgets or “quotas”. Reality runs at loggerheads. Fate sneers at quotas, will denies restriction and impulse ignores budgets. But, most importantly, there never was or will be a complete human race, regardless of Elon Musk’s ramblings.
Confirmed by the Genome Project, we “break into” groups of subtly batched hybrids of various descriptions but, sadly, courtesy of an attached political agenda, impact of findings is watered down or scorned. Findings should confirm, per “twelve” (which were originally actually thirteen) tribes of Israel, delineation of white races was correctly mapped by the ancient Hebrews. Eye and hair colour (in appropriate combination) is a vital key to comprehension of data. For instance, all (Celtic Irish) green eyed redheads belonged to one bracket (tribe of Benjamin). They were not the same as those with brown eyes and black hair (associated Irish settlers came from a later exodus wave). Red heads made good priests and were men of conscience. As with the deadly black haired, blue-grey eyed, brown eyes shared some military prowess but were gifted artists also. If there was a “bad” tribe, it wasn’t Benjamin. In my opinion, they took the rap for the Levites, who have caused much of the mischief that promulgates global affairs since their conception. Levi is an anagram of evil (which Krishna warned us “paralyses”). There is no greater paralysis than rules and regulations dressed as “accountability” (from accountant). Leviticus (backed up but also occasionally contradicted by Deuteronomy) IS biblical law. Hebrews specifically limited the white races tally to twelve. However, they also recognised supplementary types such as Nubians. In fairness, symptomatic of the modern age, [most] pure genetic integrity has been lost through careless past inter-marital reproduction, perhaps best highlighted by the disappearance of negro slaves in Portugal. Those legendary Olmec genes, I would argue, have not been preserved by us.
The virgin human genome is only 125 thousand years old, so there had to be “steps along the way. I regularly reference that Adam and Eve parable taken from biblical Genesis as a provider of insight on the subject. By extension, our immature Genome Project has identified eight women (mitochondrial DNA) as primal carriers of root genes. Estimates pertaining to evolution date ranges span from 250 to 350 thousand years. Critically acknowledged in the Adam and Eve parable, statistics are actually reflecting the “Adam” component of this developmental history. Adam “in context”, I have written before, was Neanderthal. Eve or “Ish” (as described in related Babylonian texts) comprised batches of hybrids produced from Adam’s DNA, taken from the proverbial “rib”. These hybrids are best known as humans, because “hu” deliberately referenced a spiritual hierarchy below [Celtic] God Hu Gaddam. Here proposes a paradox. Clearly the entire mammalian catalogue heralds from common DNA sources, most accented along ape, dog and bear lines. Given the fact he blinked out of existence millions of years ago, if Hu Gaddam is Pteroid, how could he have had any influence over the manufacture of Adam and Eve in ascended state (dimensionally adrift of conscious or “material” realms)?
A little sub-note is necessary here. Three “strand” DNA caters for input from conscious, subconscious and superconscious. In “animals” most of the alterations are determined in “conscious state”, but dogs [we know] dream, which suggests [some] animals have the capacity to be spiritual
Returning to the Pteroid paradox riddle, three plausible solutions are worthy of consideration. “Yahweh” (identified in biblical Genesis) was possibly a substitute in lieu of Pteroid’s absence. If “Yahweh” was Pteroid, he may have only been experienced metaphysically. This presupposes members of ritual gatherings would all be under influence of common substances to attain correct connective altered state. The only other explanation for this is, whilst Pteroid had ascended, his geomagnetic range was so sufficiently widened (over time), he could materialise or dematerialise at will. Reports detailing Venusian Valiant Thor’s alleged presence at the Whitehouse make like power of invisibility claims. My preferred answer would be the “substitute” option which, one must presume, though not a variation of Pteroid, bore strong enough hallmarks to pass off deity. Therefore, and squelching the notion that “Yahweh” was an accident of time, what is it and which group of hierarchical “controllers” ordained it? Moreover, given “controllers” are agenda driven, what was the ultimate purpose behind notarised liaisons? Form critics specifically commenting on Yahweh’s presence in biblical accounts have determined the persona was “cruel” and “unfair” as much as certain prophets tried to smooth over testament. This definitely affirms Yahweh was a feature of a control agenda and a harsh one at that.
The impartial scholar’s instinct might well determine the whole operation is so characteristic of their style, it must be the brainchild of the Sephardim. This would be so but for glaring contradiction in “Adam and Eve’s” “fall from grace” coda. After “God” found out about the “tree of knowledge” incident, he caused a rift between females and serpents. Texts hastily iterate love transformed into fear and distrust from that juncture onwards. And as for the serpent itself, well that was forced to slither on its belly before the feet of man, if we are to believe the integrity of information presented. (Though the passage may equally refer to humankind) why females “in particular”, I have explained before. Whereas reptilians have distinct separations between sexes, attributes of their men and women are much closer aligned to human feminine. Were we to assume they walked amongst us prior to God’s intervention, there is no known explicit “evidence” to back up opinions. Even so God, in this case, was Yahweh and the euphemistic serpent obviously “represents” the probably physical Sephardim. Thus, I’ll parcel reasoning as follows. These dastardly masterminds with extraordinary mental capacity sufficient to engineer technologies that assist our moon’s unnatural rotation have hardly “shone” righteously over proceedings dressed in their own propaganda campaign. That, I’m afraid, doesn’t seem very plausible to me which can only mean (if indeed it is the correct solution selection) Yahweh would have been under instruction of a group alien to the Sephardim.
With regards to the reptilian downgrade, the whole idea of magical transmutation doesn’t add up either. I feel we should consider related texts applied artistic license to context. In that respect there was no reptilian downgrade. Instead they effectively upgraded (“disappeared”) to leave only us and wild animals. We can confirm that disappearance, because they are not here anymore. Genesis categorically identifies our inferred reptilian creators as spiritual beings, so we need to be under no illusions as to true meanings of translation. Indeed, it could be argued texts gently subvert the truth here. Acknowledged spiritual paragons were not serpents and that is why “woman’s” (human?) love turned to fear when faced with “comparable” every day snakes. Serpentine in appearance yes, but physiologically there was no match so, how can we quantify a more precise genetic blueprint pertaining to these mysterious entities? Of course, associated theory is terrifically difficult to qualify with compunction as there are no known physical reference points. Having said that at least one corpse (presumed not descended from factions that mentored the Canaanite) has been documented by film. It is a shame we can’t request a file of autopsy reports using standard procedure.
In respect, our remaining plausible route to discovery is there may be some theory confirming insight to be gleaned elsewhere from possible related species that vaguely display shared genetics or body mechanics. To add weight there are many circumstantial historic and more recent “channelled” information sources that might shed light on the subject. From collective traditional accounts, we might ascertain that reptilian genetics are combinations of Sirian, Pteroid and alien (compounds devised by the Lyrans) sources. It seems (predecessor) Pteroid was an early response at consolidating a uniform catalogue that has been used to promulgate (through configured “evolutionary development”) all modern day Earth surface dwelling creatures, which includes human. These hydra legacy beginnings (if I might be so bold) were formed (and engineered) from dragon’s blood (surreptitiously confirmed by Babylonian texts), of course.
Perhaps emulating wiring of the ancient basilisk, I have explained before that the Sephardim (as physical entities) operate dual pulmonary systems which deliver cold and hot blood as independent streams. In human processes are fused to create warm blood. Interestingly, as far as I can ascertain, unlike our sea squid they do not require two pumps to manage flows effectively. In other words, each possesses an androgynous heart that is structurally designed to separate blood flows. In addition, by all accounts, they can activate either system at will. This presupposes they must run on sole rather than simultaneous blood flow at any given time. Results would definitely impact spiritual perspective. In some way confirming this, Apache Indians (ancestors of the great Lemurian monarchs) recognised only heart and mind culture. Critically emphasised in detail later, reptilians lack “mind product” conscience. However, associated antipathy towards righteousness is balanced to some degree by an overwhelming need to be compassionate.
Other noteworthy aspects of reptilian physiology, such as sensitive shoulders and out of place (by our accounts) vital body parts, are less important for the purposes of this essay. Their minds function very differently to ours. Hot or cold blood fuel has the potential to generate huge swings in character. The expressions “a rush of hot blood to the head” and “cold blooded murder” do more than adequately sum up differences. One state is guided by unrestricted emotion and the other schemes pathologically. None of their varied species possess the cerebral cortex (I will identify our [genetic] bridge shortly), yet, in terms of scalable intelligence quota ratings, they would classify as infinitely superior to human. In a sense, when you know the truth “analysis” is rendered perfunctory. Indeed, over-analysis has been proven to hinder correctness in our sciences. So, they don’t need to assay. Neither do dragons which suggests there are shared mechanics for whatever capacitates mind channels. In this regard Pteroid seems to have set baseline standards (i.e. they are the missing link that connects reptilians to dragons). Similarly, Neanderthal would likely have brainwork that more closely matches Sephardic limbic wiring than ours.
Many dinosaurs used decentralised methodologies and because there is general science ignorance towards “alien intelligence”, abilities have been either misrepresented or rendered void by promoting authorities
Therefore, taking into consideration all those live “big foot” sightings and the occasional dead body posthumously submitted to science, it is no surprise to me that establishment dedicates have refused to conform to truth over Neanderthal. Responding information vacuum is actually one of the best pieces of evidence supporting ever present notional reptilian overlordship. They do not want the truth about their anatomy revealed, so our scientists keep a lid on it. Even so, some evidence would come out was analysis detailing pertinent idiosyncrasies found with chimpanzee brain development to be adequately presented. In effect the harmless ape is another definite link towards substantiating dragon mind “hardware” (i.e. brains are logically designed to fulfil the mind’s potential). The manner in which we think, reflects hierarchical influence over us. We are merely lowly extensions of higher spiritual fields (upper limits adrift of our superconscious). From such lofty heights it could be supposed, per Anunaki (who have engulfed much of our solar system) universe view, we mostly appear as imperceptible “atom sized” specks which might occasionally taint their pristine view. To put things into fuller perspective, I don’t think they could relate to our sense of linear time or its materialistic order either. There are entities that perceive incidence so slowly, one cosmic blip would equate to 12 million of our years. Perhaps greatly downscaled lifecycles of micro-organisms below us analogically compare.
If we are to take the idea of reptilian overlords governing our current politics seriously, we would first need to understand how their society hums along to approximate where watermarks appear in our own communities. Prior to sensational Israelite desertion, it is almost certain that primitive civilisations were regulated by physical Sephardim. One poignant Babylonian stone etching displays serpentine guards in military stance with stone rods (their equivalent of light sabres) armed at the perimeter of a seemed placid gathering. This, in fact, provides a classic snapshot capturing their community standards too, because the whole concept backing our subsequent intense military discipline “best practice” (emphasised by organs such as London’s “Beefeaters”) heralds from their intervention in our affairs. Their military standards are decidedly “double”, of course. Forget any opportunity for amnesty, like the Geneva Convention, unless this provides windows to infiltrate and spy on the enemy. “At home”, their dedication is balanced by uniform subservience to duty and honour. “Orders” are observed religiously. Opponents, as designated, whomever they may be, by their rules, deserve only treacherous treatment. That legacy allegedly pertaining to their behaviour while amongst us is very much present in ancient records and legends.
Said texts notably divide reptilians into two stark versions. One is autocratic, administering an overbearing and unsympathetic guard that stifles populations (please seek out those chilling Vedic Nagas). The other provides sympathetic education which, compared against alternatives, shines through as virtuous. Indeed, Aborigine and some native American cultures treated certain individuals with such reverence they have been remembered as great sages. One tribe (located in Southern Canada) featured a strategic image on totem poles. However, if the truth be known, both [perceived] good and bad guys worked for the exact same regime. In a way the Pharisees have imposed an identical model on the world at large over time. Heralded Greek universities were their idea. The Greeks didn’t pursue education. They directed dogma. That is why emerging ancient Roman elites sent their offspring to British mystery schools. Reptilian sages “conditioned” their folly and so too does the “education” system today. Current brainwashed students are not permitted the chance to think for themselves until preparing post-graduate Masters or Doctorate theses. There are other community measures in place too though, focusing on brass tacks, effective control of “the masses” is directed either by austere law enforcement or social conditioning via schooling (or the goggle box), identically following reptilian philosophy. Pharisaic Zionism or “fortress-ism” in respect prepares a prison planet.
The main differences between human and reptilian social harmony splits into two critical “reactions” to order. Reptilians (in the main) religiously observe laws which are believed in. We grudgingly pretend to find common ground in legislations which are mostly ignored. I mentioned earlier that, following dragon mind, they do not have conscience. This is balanced by capacity to offer extraordinary acts of benevolent compassion, which travels all the way up to their versions of law court systems. Sadly, there is very little corresponding compassion (or even conscience for that matter) active in human justice mechanisms. Our courts preside over deliberately unfairly biased judgement in favour of those who “claim” they have been dishonoured. No excuse is good enough to exonerate anyone that breaks the law. Reptilian justice functions differently. Circumstances behind infractions are deemed more vital than outcomes or who was hurt by criminal incidence. Ironically, our system is much more closely aligned to Atlantis facilities that mercilessly upheld truth. Metropoles may have been governed by Pleiadians, but administrative infrastructures (underpinned by rules without laws) were religiously supplied by Sirians (owners of our logical cerebral cortex). On the subject of Pleiadians, there is a distinct commonality between reptilian and human via unwittingly misdirected “laws of attraction”. We both have an irritating tendency to volunteer support without carefully thinking through implications.
I believe the main reason reptilian society harmonises under law is all individuals are extremely militant. Far from being the exception, everyone there is a conspiracy theorist in waiting. Thus, historic battles many and numerous etched workable finalised governance formulas. Humans impose skewed minority rule over the top (and over most heads too) of majorities. Incessant propagandas reinforce maligned thinking that laws, presented within unchallenged synthetic “situation vignettes”, sound morally plausible, whilst not usually a hindrance (hence the trend to ignore them) to subservient normal people. Perhaps this lack of applied compassion or conscience (at best only ever “halfway there”) is what the Gods fretted over (implied by biblical anger at the tree of knowledge). We do everything in smaller scale than those higher than us. Our Jesuits and Ayatollahs study for twenty-five years before “graduation”. By comparison Reptilian adepts apply mastery of disciplines for a minimum of forty years (is that why “Jesus” spent forty days and forty nights in the wilderness to challenge the devil?). Everything in smaller scale is surely going to change because we do follow them, gradually. That alone validates our status as a newer, but altered, version of their gene set (with imbedded tracks influencing the manner we think). Indeed, our electric body is mapped to the dragon’s caduceus (represented as Pleiadian Hermes’ Rod of Asclepius in ancient Greek culture). Surely evidence enough to support human extra-terrestrial heritage beneath the Anunaki?
