Tag Archives: Zeta Reticuli

The Sirius-Israel Connection

Standard
The Sirius-Israel Connection

Aside from those spurious science theories, we know little about the Sirius star system. Vague myths assert Atlantis ancestors may have had their original ancestral home in the region. How far back these origins stretch is largely left to the imagination of the investigator. Whether the Sirius marked on modern day star charts follows ancient locational knowledge is still up for debate. No one has ever visited the region. There are also valid concerns that undermine debate. For example, physicists presume astral depth follows linear perception when, in fact, existence at its most raw is devoid of time space or the supposed continuum because everything is flat packed (and can collapse down to nothing) behind the various realities (Ummo extra-terrestrials termed this dimension ten, “summary of everything”). Frequency algorithms (delivered by catalysing atoms) provide all mechanics of “what is” and certain entities that have facility to manipulate this knowledge can be anywhere or “any when” in an instant’s desire. That aside, over great distances measurement does not mirror known empirical conformity. Perhaps this is why Babylonian star charts look odd. If one was to make their notorious petrified depictions of our solar system the example, cosmologists would surely quip, “ignoring the anomalous extra body, positional order of planets is correct, but scale is completely wrong”. Yet, what if the Babylonians (or whoever advised them) recreated astral perspective? Putting that aside, when mathematical calculations are made pertaining to Babylonian wisdom, astrophysicists regularly marvel at their accuracy (some examples within one per centile of modern day figures). These scientists would do well to work on that inaccuracy.

Throughout my life, I’ve been a bit of a traveller. Respectively, over the years, I have visited many new places. Each and every one bore surprises for me. My expectations were, in some instances, exalted. Whether negatively or positively, sometimes I was overwhelmed and others I was less, but I never found any place fully matched expectations. No place was as the postcard depicts. Therefore, I am left to assume that venturing out into space would offer more of the same but “on steroids” as it were. In that respect, if Kathmandu doesn’t quite live up to the tour guide, how will Zeta Reticuli “reality” fare? Perhaps some of these strange geographies are going to be imaginatively inconceivable; realities so adrift of mundane 3D. Regards the astral region “in focus’, In effect all we can do is discern the word “Sirius”. Indeed, we cannot categorically determine whether the ancients revered Sirius as it is “known” today or even if our star charts are accurate enough to convey the location as it is. When Lemurian hosts took Sixto Paz Wells to Ganymede (a large moon off Jupiter), he had to be in altered state to experience that reality, which proposes certain planets, “barren” to the 3D eye, are teaming with life at higher astral frequencies (outside mundane perception). In addition, there is a clue in the name that suggests Sirius location may well be beyond our reality plane, but I will unravel more on that later. Down to fundamentals, astrophysicists measure brightness of light (and other calibrations) to gauge extreme distances in space. But their calculation data is inaccurate (some relational fields of light are incorrect or unknown) because stars produce many different types of resonance (i.e. standard spectrums do not match our “hi-jacked” black solar light benchmark). Suffice to say, realistic considerations about the Sirius region in general are still at the locational guesswork stage.

Though all carnal expressions should be tentatively regarded as labels (which will beg comprehension later in this essay), the name does exist and is unchanged from its presumed ancient Roman conception. Thus, any diligent student would find it necessary to seek additional insight that might improve hereditary analysis. Indeed, linguistic experts argue Latin script is a variation of earlier Greek, which itself is a very loose adaptation of Phoenician rune. The Phoenicians provided three (of twenty two) consonants devoted to voicing what makes the “S” sound today and one for “Z”. This is quite intriguing because it adds to the hereditary nature of the proposed analysis somewhat. Extra-terrestrial visitor Bek-ti (as referenced by Robert Morning Sky’s Terra Papers) reputedly revealed two raw vocalisations which stretch back to the dawn of time. Precisely how they were written or how alphabets have changed is unknown (and also marginally unimportant), so I refer only to “sounds” here. Predictably pronounced in the manner a snake hisses, Bek-ti’s primary word is expressed as “S” by Robert Morning Sky. Accordingly, it was used to donate the group that are sometimes termed “Anunaki”. Under these auspices they were the constructive “abusers” of the universe and, in that capacity, must regarded as uniform “Gods”. In relation, Bek-ti specifically advised, beyond conquest of territory, they only sought worshipers.

The other sound he revealed was “R”, which represents a guttural gurgle characteristically not dissimilar to a lion’s rolling roar. Translated it would mean “man”. Seeking parallels to validate Bek-ti’s conceptualisation, I find the Gnostic version of the creation of existence compares well.  In that interpretation, God divides into slumbering male, active female and divine “all knowing” spirit (trinity). Female (Sophia), according to the story, created existence against the advice of the divine spirit (making her a theoretical abuser of equilibrium) which resulted in the design flaw (emphasised by the Fall of Satan) that allowed accidental physicality to manifest, collectively labelled “Adam” (but euphemised as “man”). Perhaps this is a contextual moot point, but the divine “male” corresponds with atomically physical female and vice-versa for divine “female”. Anyway (returning to Bet-ti’s explanation of things, whereby “S” relates to spirit and “R” body), It seems more than ironical to me that Sirius contains no less than three (fifty per cent of content) of these, two being “S” and one “R”. Personally, I do not buy into coincidences and suspect there must be more to that strange quirk of fate. Ancient ones tell me the universe is calculated from a carefully managed script (a different way of interpreting Ummo’s dimension ten, I guess) and, so far, their reasoning has proved impeccable. Nothing should be regarded as “arbitrary” even if popularised innuendo is determined to contradict premises. Because of the connective nature of the script that binds everything together; motives can conflict or confuse those that are not privy to the extent of everything or, better put, “big picture”.

Perhaps motivated by Einstein’s memorable comments reflecting fear of the quantum layer; instinct beckons primary analysis of [the true meaning of] Sirius should be “detailed”, approached “letter by letter”. Maybe efforts will prove futile, but failure to upturn the stones will equally guarantee secrets are sealed. Sirius has already been identified as an ancient Roman word, but was the legacy borrowed? I certainly wouldn’t put it past de facto Pharisee led Philistines. Later accounts defining Israel (and subordinate Abraham) will firmly identify plagiarism is their style. You can put a politician in blue clothes and pin a “democrat” badge on his lapel, but Republicans are instantly recognisable by their smell. Beyond succumbing to those tired propagandas, how can we distinctly ascertain whether Sirius is indeed an apex of the dawn of time? In this respect, the Romans may have voiced natural chimes that had been in circulation unchanged for billions of years. Should the letters of Sirius magically capture something beyond rational explanation, I’m afraid paradox will still only be justified by belief in results. Nevertheless, I shall endeavour to illuminate sanity as methodologically as possible. Will individual letters of Sirius cooperate to express something extraordinarily great? If so, the word will perhaps propose a “message in a bottle”.

Having gone through the process now, I can tell those ready to discern that all parts of Sirius play vital roles in the discovery of a subliminal record deeply hidden in plain sight. Unique consonants or vowels are specially selected and summarise as follow: “S” “I” “R” and “U”. We will learn “S” and “I” have been deliberately duplicated for potent effect.  Work has already been done to correctly convey “Anunaki” (the Celts used a shortened version “nun” to represent curved ocean currents of space, which is sadly nominally mistranslated to mean primordial “creative” waters) connection to Bek-ti’s enigmatic “S”. Strategically aligned, “R” in primordial context stands for man which Gnosticism represented as “physical existence”. Now it is time to evaluate positional significance of the other parts. Insomuch “I” reflects a pillar (or support) but can be used to describe nations. When “doubled” each I signifies the boundary (or limit) of a nation, present between pillars as it were. On the subject of pillars, those remarkable Greek ruins that brandish characteristically ornate columns are in fact legacy of Atlantis and not plagiarising Philistines. It is no coincidence similar monuments are occasionally inexplicably uncovered at “random” seabed locations. Perhaps the best evidence for Atlantis is embroiled in the Pantheon (God extended), which was not originally used as a theatre. Instead it functioned as a temple. Profound “hymns” were sung by congregations at special tonal frequencies so as to draw communal energy from the Earth’s centrifugal heart for purposes of performing “miracles”. If we could mimic these precise frequencies, it would be possible to replicate the process today.

So taking I-R-I in positional context, there is a clear path to the “kingdom of man”. Nevertheless, to be over presumptive should always be regarded as sloppy. Is there another way to verify information? Certainly, concerning “R”, I do not consider Bek-ti attributed any relational connection to humankind. Rather, aside from that auspicious “Adam” metaphor, he loosely referred to the Anunaki split (emphatically recounted by Robert Morning Sky) which preceded the new “face of God” (carelessly mentioned in biblical Genesis). “R”, as used, I determine, was a different type of man; one that might best appraise to theoretical “God in person” (Elohim?). Core Anunaki are unable to-manifest (without available surrogate hosts). Hierarchically beneath them, Ba’al (from many meanings found in Sanskrit’s glossary, “Ba” best attributes water or baptismal purification of “Al” – almighty, in this case) operates at the highest spiritual level of manifestation, but the range of entities types that casually form within bandwidth might only be classed as proto-physical. Hence mere mortals cannot directly experience Ba’al unless in altered state. Though I find no confirming folklore, it seems to me that a significant portion of the Anunaki’s internal dispute (causing their irrevocable split) was driven by the partial desire to be physical. Sirian ancestors, under that premise, became the first living Gods (confirming Bek-ti’s suggestions). No wonder, even with significantly downgraded DNA, the Anunaki chose Sirians (by now an enemy) to act as their hosts, because they proposed perfect genetic alignment (or, at least, that was the sound theory). But of course, as I have outlined on many other occasions, it proved to be a wilfully disastrous experiment, perhaps highlighting how far apart each side of virgin Anunaki had become adrift of the other. Foul affairs didn’t alter progeny. Sirians remain descendants of the original Gods, so they are as close to “divine in physical form” (“R”) as is possible. Thus, in respect to my IRI inquiry, “Kingdom of Man” is justified, but might just as well transliterate as “Kingdom of God”.

So this newly discovered Kingdom of God is framed by S-U-S. Respective use of God doesn’t necessarily imply An, El or Al-mighty. Instead it probably substitutes a premium entity (normally grouped to facilitate spectral delineation that defines distinct traits of individuality) bestowed with God-like qualities or powers. “S” we already know signifies the Anunaki (double “S” verifies the hierarchical split, but there are other associated meanings). Though An (the Almighty) may truly perceive Anunaki figments as nothing more than sentient beings, their potent presence warrants greater respect from morals. It is reasonable to consider, for the Sirians (again, in context) their deep ancestors provide acumen that justifies belief in a metropolis of heavenly status (an essence external of but pertaining to existence if you will). They will always determine their own divine purpose is a direct attribution of oneness with their genetic cousins, regardless of past catastrophic attempts at repatriation and the subsequent bitter fall out. Thus a bridge (something akin to an olive branch) gleefully anticipates future revivification. Whilst it offers a rather dysfunctional shape, our “U” is that bridge. So to reiterate, “I-R-I-U” provides meat for an Anunaki (“S-S”) sandwich (producing potence that is omnipresent). Per this model, the Kingdom of God annexes a gateway (or drawbridge) to allow God’s return. That, letter by letter, is what Sirius means.

There is further evidence supporting the notion that Sirians are potentially divine. Of all spiritual entity types, they obsessively live by the laws of balance. Conversely, for instance, the wry might compellingly argue feline Lyrans (cheesy image is there for “effect”) are bestowed with the uncanny ability of “smelling” imbalance. When trouble brews, they are never too far away, but also rarely too close so as not to make a speedy getaway. Sirians strive to travel the path of virtue to attain enlightenment whereas Lyran modelled reptilians obsess over conspiracies that forever seek “agents of blame”. Humans are pitched between those two posts and perhaps that explains why our politics unravel a perpetual clash between wisdom and reaction. From all bureaucracies on Earth, undoubtedly the best place to witness this clash culture is Israel. Reasons are more than historic, but history can provide many clues as to how this is so. For instance, modern day Israel is one of the “reptilian hotspots” that has been identified by extra-terrestrial agents who supply exo-political personality Eva Draconis. Current Israelite affairs compare well as adjuncts to old colonialist standards and divining Hebrew industrialist despots remain spiritually inept in their ardour. The legacy that has been inherited doesn’t paint a particularly nicer picture. Today we witness a saga that provides perpetual victims from a Holocaust that rebellious engineering experts have proven must be phony. I say (please refer to my other website for more detail on this) that the Holocaust did happen, but it did not target or decimate any Hebrews. No, after Hitler’s “promise” (tucked away in Mein Kampf, a popular Hebrew read, I’m told), the WWII Allied bombings of Dresden, Hamburg and Frankfurt successfully caused a mini-Armageddon against Christian Slavic populations. There is much data backing theft of ideas and cultures under guise of Judaism, confirming this spiritual ineptness, and also “calculated” (let minions do our work) reptilian instinct.

They may well believe wilful plagiarism amounts to adjusted improvement according “progress”, but occasionally their coarse bluster is directly exposed. Myths supporting the premise Hebrew priests “forgot” how to pronounce the “true name of God” equally support the opinion that they never knew the real name of God to begin with. Their plunder of Babylon had actually inherited a vacuum of knowledge which is subtly preserved by ignorance. Yet, as pillage is their way, is it not worthy to consider whether reflective motive embroiled in the “creation” of Israel was equally maligned? If Israel had contextually existed for all time, then confusion as to the basis would surely permit possibility for a veil concealing pungent plagiarism? We should be all too aware (in the karmic sense) of how the slippery hand of the ambitious zealot operates. Suffice to say, that creed would have no compunction but to grab everything they could after the rightful owners of “useful” heritage had disappeared. But in specific regards to Israel, logic dictates there is a rather obvious Achilles heel that obstructs zealous tribute. Isis is clearly a more modern concept than many would care to consider and zealots hinge everything on the “interplay” between Ra and Isis (emphasised by their Persian Passover atrocity – biblical Egypt presented a metaphor). Originally Isis consisted of one simple syllable. Synonymous with later translations, two distinct pronunciations (“Is” vocalised either as “ayz” or “iss”) were combined to make the dual syllable word “!s-is”. Sadly, I do not have enough “reference points” (inherence delivers information in such out-of-context parcels) to discern which meaning relates to which sound with certainty, but differences are as follows. I suppose “Ayz” conveys “soulful intent” and “Iss” is the inherited “void of darkness”, but it could be the other way round. There can be no doubt that if Israel was created much earlier than is commonly believed; Isis would not have existed per se. That is how our zealots Achilles heel is significantly unmasked. Had Ra and El and Isis in combination been a Hebrew invention, their respective nation would be called Isisrael. But why on Earth would they choose to embezzle a silly word and make such a big fuss of it?

There is, of course, another problem attached to the whole affair. Though Babylonian politics surrounding Ra and Isis are compelling, they don’t make a great deal of conjectural sense when factoring in El, which we now know is Almighty God or An (note, I wonder if An/El/Al were different branches of a much earlier genre version). Ra, taking position as God’s spiritual portal, works well in combination with El (“father of existence”). My initial thoughts pertaining to analysis of Israel repeatedly visualised the Buddhist yin yang effect for some unfathomable reason. Then it occurred to me, after I explored conceptualisation further, that if one was to take the enclosed circle (a comparable feature of the Anunaki Cross) as representing “El”, a serpentine path (“S”) etching “fate” is accidentally formed by light and dark. Light is obviously personified by Ra, but Isis is much more than darkness unless the “Iss” (void of space) interpretation takes associative precedence. To convey clarity of meaning, “Is” (rather than Isis) is the most apt terminology. The plot, though, becomes rather thicker upon deeper investigation into Israelite tradition. Did our slippery Zealots know precisely what they had plundered?

But there is more to this saga than the invention of Israel. After Adam, the most revered “man” who ever lived was Abraham and that fact is celebrated by all practicing Jews. Perhaps we need more background on Adam (who, Gnostics inform us, goes many names, including Yaldebroath) to fully appreciate premises, Suffice to say, if Adam came first, could he represent physical or “black” existence (there are two distinct complimenting reality dimension bandwidths and humanity is on the cusp of ascension to the higher one) in its entirety? According to the Gnostic preserved accounts, this is the truth for he was brought to life by and became the cherished son of Sophia (female aspect of God) while God slumbered. Thus, Adam, in the strictest terms, is Isis. Now, truth revealed, here it starts to become interesting. The biblical account of Genesis categorical states that Abraham was a man who sacrificed (destroyed?) his first born son (– implying that son was Adam who also represents atomic existence) for God (colonialist imposter?), which kick started the “nation of Israel”.

He, supplemented by those conditions, is the paternal father of the Hebrews. However, I question the validity of the biblical account unless it was expressive metaphor. Given my accompanying suggestions (highlighted in brackets), the truth supporting unaltered meaning is alarming, to say the least. Perhaps it is worth investigating ancient word stems that collectively attribute Ab-Ra-Ham. Maybe they will précis affirming those disturbing subliminal messages preserved in the Genesis text, or conversely we might discover something else.  Let us put diligence to the test. And it seems fitting to start with Hebrew language as it is their legacy. So Hebrew “Ab” in the biblical translation equates to “father” in English. Whilst I haven’t found parallels in other tongues (intriguingly “Ba” is bad father in Sanskrit), inherence confirms it stems from a [forsaken] ancient Atlantis dialect. “Ra” has already been evaluated in position in Israel, so I will move swiftly on with my analysis of “Ham”, which is an expression that does appear in Sanskrit’s glossary. Values are quite decisive in this instance. Ham correspondingly means either aether or void of darkness. Where have we heard that before?

Eureka!

Abraham wasn’t the father of Israel. He is Israel, disguised only by that rebranding of terminology, “Ab” doubles as “El”, “Ra” is in correct position and “Ham” reflects Is to complete a mirror image (order reversed). In spiritual terms, the mirror brings truth to life, so Abraham is both metaphor and pun. He marked the beginning of national independence and this has tragically envisaged tyrannical Zionism (such is the determination to impose “peace” on the World). Nevertheless, guaranteed authenticity of naming conventions can be hard to justify given the apparently arbitrary nature of words. For instance, planet Uranus was only “discovered” by modern man in 1781 yet the name is a very ancient one which testifies more than is obvious to the casual eye. In this specific case, it can be broken into different resolving “Atlantis style” components. Let me demonstrate what I mean by that. U-Ra-Nus (as alliterated) disbanded would translate to “domain that conforms to the spiritual essence of God”. Yet if we commute values differently, sceptics would be surprised to learn that parts combining as Ur-An-Us covert as “resting place that provides afterlife for God’s deceased spirits” (i.e. spirit “heaven”). That accordingly more or less places both translations in synch.

In fact, generally speaking, names of every heavenly body with histories predating our modern era provide clues as to deep understand of the formularisation of existence. Ve-nus perhaps makes an exception to the rule (although I will contradict this rough explanation at the conclusion of this essay). From Sanskrit, we discover “dangling fertility” (bait) or temptress assures Venus is shielded by prosperity.  There is further, more subtle, evidence. Plural of the Greek word for “stars” is ast-ra (aster singular). Ra provides the spiritual component of all stars, this suffix positioning is correct in the plural (and would be misrepresentative in the singular), but did the Greeks know this? Hebrew word El-o-him (God-beings) has no singular context, because it highlights the omnipresence of almighty and hints at how raw spirituality spawns. Even so, the most salient point I am trying to make here is that “Ra” symbolises higher authority than individual stars and our deep ancestors either knew that or parroted knowledge they did not fully appreciate. Putting “Ra” to the test, one would expect the value to significantly feature in generic origins of star. Consequentially, Sanskrit, most ancient of all languages and closest to Atlantis script, represents star as Ta-Ra-Ka (from Hindi). In fact, other related Hindu words (such as Ta-Ra, Si-Ta-Ra and Nak-Shat-Ra symbolism) provision for essential Ra as well. We can learn so much from the ancients pertaining to the precise point and purpose of the universe. But, of course, generations of obsessive zealots have stealthily and deliberately censored the record in order to reduce it to gibber. Over millennia, the many and frequent changes have had the effect of bleaching consistent truth. Legacies are the mockeries that are religions, which has ensured mankind is permanently confused and will remain that way without a catalyst. For the zealots conditioning of the many has proved extremely bountiful. Mass slaves are rendered so acutely susceptible; they are almost oblivious to their tyrannical whims.

Distortion of truth perhaps always was geared towards destroying spiritual validity. True spiritual connection can only be achieved through communion. That is why Avalon based Gnostic Druids (quite different from the frilly “New Age” order established by an imposter in the eighteenth century) are mocked. Stone Henge, once used by the imposters as a feeble place of worship, had actually functioned as a Pteroid (another plausible “R” contender) congregation point (beginnings of sacred sanctuary tradition) millions of years before the monument is “said to have been” created. But, returning to spiritual validity or rite, initially, individuals must earn their passage to literally evolve or configure to “find self” in preparation for essential integration with “other” (true communion). Now zealots dictate terms as to acceptable “limits of man” and there is no permissible self-discovery tour (beyond those boundaries). Complimenting religions pompously instruct profane morality issued by some vaporous, hostile authority in the expectation followers will bow down before this precarious wisdom unruffled. Prior to distortion, Sirians were transparent in their efforts at progressing illumination, although it should be noted that those that aren’t ready for wisdom were not provided the mechanics to see. They may be domineering and (sometimes) uncompromising, but Sirians will not overtly deceive. Even without assistance, it should be patently obvious that attainment of communal partnership can only be reached by members who have “found” true self (devoid of corruption). Suffice to say, it takes but one weak link for collaboration of engagement to disintegrate into “contest”. Contest, of course, is the primary step towards outright conflict or “war”. Welcome to planet Earth. Given that background, it is easy to appreciate why genetic heritage used to be so prized. Progeny wasn’t about status, although those with pedigree sometimes came with certain unique abilities distinctly separating them from other. Genetic integrity has been more or less squandered (even with strict elite marriage policy), so now just about all conceivable tracks have been buried. Unsurprisingly, consequences have bubbled up sporadic prodigies to no set agenda, but this “phenomenon” has vainly been attributed as “evidence” to support notional “Darwinistarbitrary nature of procreation, which is the great lie. Did it make “Mein Kampf”, I wonder? Now, there is one natural “hereditary” prodigy exception. Yes, “facts” are widely promoted by those determined to justify Jewish superiority per their “chosen” status. It seems they have been validated by music.

Ancients knew the truth behind divine evolution of genetic tracks and certain Gnostic texts cautiously philosophise over the subject. In my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” I remark on the vital importance of Anunaki bloodlines (remembering any “life force” is alien to the body, highlighting the critical nature of finding true self) in relation to how we develop towards ascension. Converting precise hierarchical structures down to man, I have listed root genealogies many times before (in prior published essays/articles). Per that outline, hu-man (hyphenated deliberately) is either version three or version four of Anunaki man depending on interpretation of “order” (and “man”, I guess). For instance, dragons (genetic licensees) record Tyrannosaurus Rex as first Earth man. Following the destruction of Maldek (which provoked a hyper-evolutionary downscale of the large dinosaurs due to significant change to Earth’s orbital cycle), the T-Rex form was lost and man was no more. In the range of 30-50 million years ago a new intelligent biped was created to fill the void and this is known as Pteroid today by the privileged few. A strange looking character, various Pterodactyl types are its legacy (satisfying 3D reality). Pteroid had spiritually ascended with such verve, by around 5 million years ago (I cannot give a more precise figure) it was on the cusp of blinking out of the then reality plane. Thus, in accordance with wishes of an intergalactic consortium, a partially alien man was created (“visage” modelled on T-Rex) to take over. Tabloid journalists that “deal with esoteric matters” tend to refer to the wider group of new man as “reptilians” (even though they predominantly comprise of Sirian/feline gene stock).

Liturgy of our relationship [beneath the hierarchy] is sadly not that apparently simple. Hu-man comprises various batches of similarly aligned (some almost identical) hybrids.  Our pedestrian Genome Project can only perceive minute differences separating the various “brackets”, but ones with access to holistic DNA (located in the quantum layer) could present a much more complete (and varied) picture. Celtic God Hu-Gadam (or Hu God as far as I’m aware) is our indirect creator (or rather, DNA licensee), hence the reason for that enigmatic “hu” prefix. Following this account, Pteroid (acting Hu Gadam) assumed the Satyr form. Whether transformation was a symptom of spiritual ascension is open to debate. Reptilians produced our early batches while God was away (i.e. without Pteroid authorisation, which also hints at his ascension) and they took the unprecedented steps of combining previously unused Sirian DNA (coded as “tree of knowledge” in biblical Genesis?) in batch production. Creation of the cerebral cortex is the remarkable legacy and we are the only creature known to have inherited it. But this also marks an exceptionally important sundry point because obvious human-Sirian “dual generic heritage” is brusquely exposed in our being (not as apparent in reptilians). Along the Sirian line, we represent core genetic version seven. Before I mentioned we are either type three or four Anunaki man. To the purist, T-Rex was a design made obsolete and, although certain genetic facets were used to create reptilian man, Pteroid is the closest spiritual link to the Anunaki. Reptilian man would become unlicensed geneticists whereas, to the best of my knowledge, T-Rex was nothing more than a very intelligent creature, falling short of essential spiritual being.

Prior to creation of “physical” man, genetic progeny was generally perceived in spiritual terms (adrift of physicality). At the very top of the proverbial ladder, the same group called “Anunaki” I keep referring to are, relative to physicality, permanently non-manifest. They needed an outlet for expression and, after deep contemplation, imagined “Ba-al” (which means baptised or, better still, “prepared God) into being. Manifestation comprised a group of entities with unique characteristics, enough to represent essential Anunaki variance.  However I need to qualify, use of manifestation here is partially symbolic. The Ba’al collective is located in the highest spiritual realms, too far displaced from mundane reality to connect with our physicality. A bridge linking physical reality (allowing Ba’al and Anunaki quasi-presence) was forged when dragons were brought into being to represent “hierarchical” interests, notably preservation of genetic heritage. Human is one element of that heritage and dragons (possibly biblical angels), in that respect, were (prior to their ascension) the highest physical outlet to God. If human was not a spiritual being, there would have to be exceptional reasons to permit our genetic preservation. Thus, to dispel any confusion, it is vital that what is meant by spiritual here persuades comprehension. At its very baseline, anything spiritual must reflect the will of God. This might conflict with interests of self, so selfish behaviour should instinctively be regarded as probably obstructing spiritual purpose. To fortify [the fact], beasts of most grotesque appearance and savage behaviours, whilst empowering the will of God, are spiritual. By extension, there are no formally accountable laws that might précis spirituality. There exist only situation relevant senses of what is right and what is wrong in relation to life purpose.

Great spiritual pretenders will perennially test vanity, of course. The rather more problematical question is, “can the Gods behave vainly too?” Highlighted by a website visitor here a few years ago, we were categorically advised the Anunaki are “rogue time lords who parasite off infected domains”. Before jumping to any set conclusions on this information, it would be advisable to first apply due diligence as best we can. For instance, what if that warning “by itself” turned out to be bogus; perhaps an extension of a malicious slander campaign directed by parties unknown (who, by rote, we might ascertain, are Anunaki bitter opponents)? I have written extensively about the tenuous partnership between Sephardim (reptilian overlords and Anunaki, which plays out more as a battle between foes. In that respect, without doubt, messages from my website visitor did show Sephardic hallmarks. However, information was also demonstrative and “explicit”, which places uncertainty over ownership. Reptilians prefer to communicate with innuendo, proverb, cryptic analogy or metaphor (some I have witnessed have been so obscure, they have taken me years to effectively decode). Therefore, in denial of the Sephardim, it seems to me the most likely source for data is the Jupiter located Lemurians (I exampled their connection with Peruvian Sixto Paz Wells earlier). Even so, due diligence implores, how can this Lemurian wisdom be verified? Well, first off, Anunaki is not the correct name for God. Israelite “propagandist” Zechariah Sitchin broke the Babylonian terminology into two words “Anu” “Naki”, which he claimed referred to God (Anu) coming down from the heavens.

Though the analysis fits in well with the tradition of great meteorology deities such as Celtic Beelzebub and Roman Zeus, the true Almighty does not need to conquer that which is part of “himself”. Sitchin, at best, probably identified an outrageous insubordinate (though later in this assay I will offer alternatives). True God is Annunaki and naming conventions combine three distinct values. “An” is the almighty, the whole, the presiding effervescent force. “Nun” (preserved in Celtic script), I repeat, stands for primordial darkness comprising infinite oceans of space that are building blocks of existence. Aki (ironically found in modern day Japanese) is the unquenchable, dazzling light which is graded (Gnostics identify as states) spiritual vitality and sum of all knowledge (logos). Perceptive visitors will notice that my descriptive outline is very similar to sketches I made of “Israel” and “Abraham” earlier. So much so, I believe all three are different versions of a solitary information source which may have been deliberately distorted over the ages, but I will do my best to explain premises. Why would Anunaki be given the same name as God unless some (deceptive) agency was determined to confuse “believers” into believing imposters were the extent of magnificence?

Could identical philosophy be attributed to Israel and Abraham?

If we consider Israel in particular, there are some very odd distortions at play. According to ancient maps, the territory occupied a small strip of land alongside Judea. Then, Jews were peoples of Judea and not (necessarily) Israel. Later conceptual land demarcation was to change, and change, and change again. With all these changes came confusion. Israelites, for instance, are the only people on this planet that do not require a nation to be nationals (goyim). That is possibly why orthodox purists prefer a state of constant limbo. In a sense, to be a national without a nation is to be free. Those bound to nations are reflective slaves. Consequentially, some Jews choose not to return to their homeland. Doubtlessly ambiguity over where authentic Israel is located aids decision making. There is also the enigma as to why the Jews (in particular) have been [supposedly] selected “by God” as His chosen people. After monstrous Jericho, given their poor record in areas of humanitarianism and world affairs, evidence seems to defy this “chosen” status. Even so trappings of honour assure they have a dedicated “Promised Land” which doubles as their ancestral homeland. Uncertainty over the original location of Israel pales to insignificance when considering the challenge of sourcing a valid route to the Promised Land.

Inconsistent theories as to the whereabouts are as numerous as wails (and teeth gnashing?) from sceptics. Nevertheless the matter becomes graver when applying supposing logic. Why would there be an Apartheid separating proverbial Israel from the Promised Land? The two must be identical twins, surely, for there is no coherent reason for division.  Then again cherished places must be kept secret lest they raise the need for valiant protectors; vanguards to authority. In line, associated with Israel and its partnering Promised Land is a (what should be obsolete) superstitious tradition which provides a kingly “Messiah” to tend to “peace on Earth”. In terms of feasibility, the concept is fraught with problems that, in effect can only lead to one ultimate outcome. Though I find no clear formal references to it in ancient folklore, the modern supposition that presumes a more wide-ranging “Greater Israel” should eventually emerge in the fullness of time has even been advanced in corporate mainstream Medias. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister, in particular, I’m informed presented a demonstrative land ready diagram which incorporates the whole of the Middle East and sections of some adjoining territories, though I haven’t personally witnessed it.

To the average person, measures might seem extreme, but for any radical, they would not go far enough. Why fill up a bucket with holes in it? Under this Peace on Earth (and God help everyone if it ever truly emerges) mandate, the entire Earth surface would become property of Israel (which, under their model, is not property of the people). And the only reason they don’t venture inwards to strange “undiscovered territories”, is they know efforts will guarantee Armageddon brought back on themselves. Bullies (and this is what these authorities are) are never particularly brave. I referenced the cult “Zionism” before. That is important; because historically a secret masonic body known as “Priory of Sion” evolved into Zionism, even though revolution might actually work as its antipathy (considering prior aims had been dedicated to preserving or restoring Zionist enemy number one authentic [Gnostic] regal heritage). Sion is a Hebrew word which equates to “fortress” or “gaol”. Hebrews set the ambition of reforming the great Atlantis citadel (euphemised as “Babel” in the Bible) back to reality. Perhaps I should add a little more to furbish better clarity of vision here. But first, not losing sight of the original investigation as to whether dated allegations issued by a website visitor characterising Anunaki as rogue time lords has credence, conclusions appears to approve the opinion, though “with reservations”.

In most ancient times, before the great flood event that may have wiped out then humanity, Sirians lived on Earth and walked amongst the people. Their efforts to relocate (to Earth) following catastrophe on Mars preceded risks, but fate did fairly decree the Anunaki (who had placed Lemurian “protectorate kings” to dispel unwelcome invaders) had moved on from Earth, perhaps never to return. Over a period greater than twenty thousand years, once settled, Sirians constructed various self-contained cities with inbuilt security (the Israelites can but dream of). Special monitoring systems assured that it was impossible to defy “rule” (even though there were no laws, in the empirical sense) inside the city. Those that committed infractions were initially contained (by an invisible light beam that had the effect of freezing anything “marked” in its path). Prisoners were later moved to holding cells while bureaucracy attempted to process resolve. Holding cells were all but jails, in conventional terms, and that is why, even up to relatively modern times, fortresses have doubled as prisons (following Atlantis convention).

Thus, “prison planet” is an expansion of the term Zionism (elevating Sion/Fortress) and if Greater Israel incorporates “the entire world”, in Toto, the overriding desire is to recreate an absolute Babel synthesis. Nevertheless, unlike Babel, tyrants can only rely on relatively primitive instruments to protect them against threats to the system that haven’t already been disposed of or aren’t “concentrated” into camps to guarantee security of the few. We can discern “options” for the masses are reduced to three: non-detection, confinement or disposal (murder). Considering ramifications In relation to this proposed brave new world, certain permanent inmates would need to be allowed to work as slaves for the benefit of the few. And, looking forward, doubtlessly the wheels of polite society would need lots of help to remain well oiled, so it is equally likely that select “gentiles” would be permitted to join privileged ranks (still slaves, but provided the misconception of common status). To uphold the peace paradigm, slaves “free” in society would have to be the distinct minority, unless special Atlantis-style policing techniques were made available. Consequentially, I would imagine (again, unless those special policing techniques were in circulation) everyone even remotely associated with “defence” would be attached to ruling classes or privilege. Routine brainwashing of insubordinates was tested to ill-effect long ago. Even today military agencies regularly use Manchurian candidates to carry out dirty assignments. These exercises leave backfiring karmic hallmarks, such as the 2005 London “bus bombings” blamed on terrorists. 2012 US (Colorado) “Batman” theatre shootings better highlight the “gap”. Killings were actually executed by accompanying “back up” professional hit men (almost certainly FBI Agents). In fact, only one of these types of operations went “almost” entirely to plan (for my research) and that was the 2009 Fort Hood massacre.

Though modern day “powers” attached to Israel have blatantly admitted to engaging in an ongoing and remorseless psychological operation (or psy-op), their profound amateurism would be made instantly redundant was human ever to master precise manipulation of genetic strata (which is to be found in quantum light). Atoms are akin to beacons. Then, production of elite warriors on demand could be guaranteed. A more difficult question bobs up in relation to this. Perhaps a short background is necessary prior to presentation.  I have written about strange, other worldly social practices before, notably horrific reptilian assimilation (where volunteers are literally eaten alive). Under order of Ba’al, nature of balance or equilibrium transcends all other concerns. So if stronger parties decide to consume weaker ones, it is considered to efficiently purify society. In line with this philosophy, a body hosts a master/slave (one master and multiple slaves) environment which technically provides for all parties to maximise regime role potential. Relevantly, Prophet Zoroaster was an Asiatic Lumerian who campaigned against the Anunaki prior to the arrival of the Sirian refugees (i.e. at least forty thousand years ago). His legacy remains with stark warnings clearly preserved in survived teachings. Anunaki unsurprisingly work off identical philosophy pertaining to order as Ba’al (Ba’al an extension of absolute divinity). Using weather systems and other devices they were able to influence great groups of people, presumably against their will and that precise same justification supports Israelite power brokers’ crude adoption of their “sheeple steering” psy-op agenda. in my opinion.

We have observed the dichotomy that is Israel, “the nation”, according to recorded history, began as a comparatively small tract of land within earshot of the Mediterranean. It has grown, some believe, to consume planet Earth (Maritime Law, which influences global constitutional etiquette, evolved from whims of the great industrialist front, the East India Company), but what if outright control of the original Atlantis concept has been the consuming objective all along and we are merely witnessing steps along the path? For the Atlanteans, Israel is existence (and beyond) in its entirety. Indeed, the only prophesised secret “annexed” haven that might counter the rigours of existence is Sirius (a heavenly gateway that should only be accessed by ones with existential powers). Hijack of religions, supplementing education systems designed to “convert the masses” would be a logical first move of usurpers determined to redeem “fate” in their favour. Naturally, per these auspices, “thoughts” would have to be rationalised. Would there be roles for thought police? Corporate mass Medias have done everything possible to promote their sense of standardised convention (kinks merely illuminate internal differences of opinion). Be it cosmetic influences have fluctuated to compliment fashions of each era,

Fundamentals” have never changed by much (if at all)

Some might determine the Anunaki have thieved God’s kudos by daring to present themselves as something divine. Yet, surely, from their lofty enlightened heights would not mundane perspective rightfully deem them worthy of awe. They were bestowed with the creative seeds and have used them productively, which is important for, in terms of desire, spontaneous creativity “under will” is the principle wish of the Almighty. Creation on Earth is undeniably Godly (natural), but for one hybrid creature who is neither being nor animal, but, rather, a fusion of the two. Offending human holds the DNA catalogue which maintains all life on Earth (that wasn’t introduced) and that is the great paradox. Already scientists tamper with amino acids with the ambition of working miracles, whilst overtly demonstrating limited to no respect for life. It is easy to blame Hebrew infidels whose ancestors (we presume) arrogantly made off with exalted Sirian heritage and marketed their plunder as though they had conceived it themselves, but we are all responsible for the mess which is the legacy. Instead we have complied with and ones with bad intentions have ultimately delivered chaos where bliss could have reigned. The result is a tiny strip of land called Israel, located in a stinking hot region of Earth, covertly governs a planet that is perpetually at war. Karma has rewarded the place called Israel fittingly. Vainly polluted by radioactive fallout, powers have forced disease upon themselves, but they have no remorse. I wonder what the “prize” is, when many Jews seem reluctant to “return” to their designate homeland.

If only the politics surrounding this topic were that transparent. My essay would have been wrapped up paragraphs ago. Today’s Israel is a synthetic oasis hewn out of Palestine.  Essential water supply has been stolen from Lebanon in typical Hebrew fashion. Palestine, in most ancient times, was known as “the place that cannot support life”. Is that what the biblical Genesis wilderness years refer to? Why would the Jews return to the place they rejected, a place they bragged was inhuman, unless it was a “decoy”, a “shoo in”? Anywhere can be made nice with enough money and technology. Though illustrious texts attempt to paint a different picture, Jewish “slaves” exodus from Babylon was welcomed but for the loss of the Great Pyramid’s fuse box, rendering Egyptians powerless. Canaan was supposedly conquered as a stop gap 1000BC, yet Jews settled for hundreds of years. I question standard chronology and recommend that Canaan’s timeline came before the wilderness years. Phoenicians (Philistine ancestors) made that location their home long after Israelites had vacated. Later some descendants may have returned to the region. Might there be a clue as to authenticity in the name “Ca-na-an”? Well, most ancient use of “ca” takes two distinct paths. “Ca” (which makes ca-nine) is the dog. More pertinently (and ironically found in modern day Romanian) “ca” substitutes for contract. Latin term “capias” was used to designate writs against non-payment of debts or financial obligations. Thus, “ca” in Atlantis tongue meant “judgemental contract” or something like prison. Are dogs not prisoners of their “owners”?

The remaining parts of Ca-na-an seem very straightforward to interpret. “Na” is “the feminine aspect” and “an” is Almighty God. Contextually meanings are very different in the way that they are used, of course. One would be tempted to presume feminine aspect of God referred to Sophia or “astral heaven”, but how could heaven dish out punishment? So, in this case, a very liberal view needs to be applied to interpretation. I am drawn once more to the biblical tale of Adam and Eve. Regular visitors to this website will already be aware that Eve was not “Adam’s wife”. Text conceals the truth about genetic originals. Adam was natural man (i.e. Neanderthal, or one of the earlier versions) and Eve is human. Human was considered much more [comparatively] feminine (also emphasising our spirituality) than natural man, but there is more to the puzzle. Hu-man may have been named after Hu “in reverence” to the genetic licensee, but unlicensed geneticists created us. We were the product of an earlier mentioned bipedal serpent (deliberately camouflaged by the biblical text so as not to blurt out the truth, in my opinion) which informally goes under the group name “Sephardim”. Commonly known as reptilians, because our physical DNA is similarly matched to theirs, in addition it appears they chose to marry into elite clans when humanity was a hubris. Accordingly, reptilian genetic material changed the human constitution and was always delivered down the female line. That schism is marked by the acute difference between male and female humans. But there’s more. Reptilians are androgynous and more closely align to our female character set (preferring emotion to logic). So now is the time to offer Zechariah Sitchin a posthumous apology. Still bottom of the class for his woeful interpretation of meaning, he earns top marks for portioning Anu and Naki in that manner. Anu should be broken as An-U and Naki compiles “Na” and “Ki”. Ki is better known as “chi” (or the inner spirit). So An-U-Na-Ki simply translates to “God’s bridge to female intent”. Clearly Sephardim are direct versions of Anunaki and that is why their partnership leveraging our sun (sol invictus) is permissible.

Anyway, hopefully the penny is beginning to drop in relation to Canaan. “Na” the feminine aspect is a reference to reptilian and “an” substitutes for [confirms] our direct unlicensed creator. Whilst the biblical account (fall from grace) contradicts truth, Israelites were banished to Canaan initially under reptilian guard (check out those enigmatic Babylonian depictions). It is possible (indeed, likely) that their jailors ascended while they were on duty, but at some juncture they vacated. Whatever the reasons, the prevailing power vacuum ensured freedom for all incarcerated. It appears some Hebrews then moved (in pace with biblical Genesis) to the wilderness (which is mis-described) leaving behind ones later to be called Phoenicians. I mentioned earlier about strong evidence decrying the traditional Holocaust as phoney. Yet, wider Jewish populations still whine and whine about the event as though it was current. They love to play eternal victim. Transfer identical reasoning across to the wilderness years suggests present day Israel is located precisely where the Jews settled after Canaan. It was the wilderness. Today, with money and technology, authorities have been able to cultivate a region unfit for living into an unnatural oasis. It seems to me that the Promised Land of Moses was most definitely not in the same region. Speculation supporting the Emerald Isle (or Ireland) as the most pertinent contender appears the best match, weighing up the Irish language is one of the closest out of place tongues notionally related to Hebrew. They have many shared words which could not be so without some prior ancient transposition of cultures.

Israel, it seems, was an attempt to provision for a new Babel. That is why Hebrews preferred to settle in Judea (within earshot) of pilgrimages to their Holy Land, yet, what of the Sirians in relation to Sirius? We know that after the Fall of Atlantis, the bulk of their population left for somewhere distant. Monks that made the sacrificial choice to stay behind to tend to needs of banished humans were advised they would never be able to rejoin their brethren. I haven’t fully understood why this is so, but it might have something to do with coded star-gates that open very infrequently (let’s say every ten thousand years). More conceivably, exiting Sirians would have extinguished tracks so unwanted invaders could not follow them. Earth bound monks were telepathically linked to loved ones but future physical engagement would become impossible. That is why I questioned our knowledge of the true location of Sirius at the beginning of this essay. Having said that, it is unlikely a star could support life, even in higher dimensional state. Be it some argue our sun reverts to planetary status in Holographic Universe Two and above, the most compelling reconstruction is Sirius acts as gateway to somewhere cherished, because life hosting would need a less volatile environment.

Couched in Babylonian folklore is the obvious destination, which is Osiris, of course. Fittingly, according to myths, Osiris is Lord of the Underworld (dead) and great judge. Whereas this may imply a role for Uranus (dwelling of rested spirits), Sirians are renowned for judgement (more in the positive than negative sense). The underworld reference might equally represent the essential dimensional shift (altered state) required to gain access to “heaven” (place of the dead). 1984 (vibration year of the “Philadelphia Experiment” time slip) founded cult called Order of Solar Temple obsessed over return to Sirius and various members committed suicide in 1997 in their efforts to make the journey. Appetites whetted, observant will note that Osiris shares all letters of Sirius, except “u”. If that is coincidence, it is remarkable. We know that “u” signifies gateway, which, in context, is a specific astral quantity. Though some planets do operate restricted time portals, stars are vastly superior “visionary” exchange mechanisms and would offer better access potential. Without “u” S-i-r-i-s stands for “Anunaki domain of the Kingdom of God”. Sirians are “face of God” Anunaki, so “Sirian domain of the Kingdom of God” would satisfy definition just as well. For the planet, Siris evolves from “O”. “O” reinforces the notion that this is a domain, but more than that. It also represents order, restriction or limit if you will. Thus, observant may determine that Osiris is Siris “under rule [of law]”. Unfortunately the Babylonians neglected to tell us where their Osiris is located, but maybe relevant science exploration will get lucky and find the connected star one day.

Conversely, is there an alternative potential route to nirvana, one that might baffle science? My prior mention of Venus could not have conceived any possible link to Sirius at the time. But, as has been the way with past projects, insight blossoms as ideas present. From my earliest memories of thoughts on the matter, I always knew that inner Venus (potent fertility) had hosted a model Anunaki civilisation until political problems escalated several decades ago, which was confirmed when I became aware of Valiant Thor’s visit and subsequent [alleged] three year imprisonment as guest of Eisenhower’s Whitehouse in the 1950’s. I did not draw connection to Sirians, until now. Venus appears to be a beacon or echo point that would offer a “conduit” direct to Sirius. In other words, Venus could double as backup route to Osiris. However, using Valiant Thor as guinea pig, though he largely compared to a typical white Caucasian human, there was noteworthy a tiny physical difference. He did not possess a belly button (which sycophants’ claim relates to “angelic status”) and this cordially implies different reproductive and birthing methods are utilised by Sirians. There were varied reports related to a strange technique demonstrating the ability to vanish or dematerialise at will (suggesting Valiant Thor’s physical bandwidth extended beyond 3D). Venus has a much more ancient name, Nibiru. Occasionally referred to as Planet X because of its rather peculiar orbital misdirection, according to my calculations, the heavenly body will alarm astrologists by venturing very close (within earshot) to Earth in roughly nine hundred years’ time. However, my figures could be very wrong. I can say this in relation to the crossing of paths, so to speak. Last time it happened (thousands of years ago), distances were close enough to allow regular cultural exchanges between inhabitants of the two planets. Will humanity, at last, be granted the window of opportunity to ascend and will this permit license to be Sirian for the lucky few?

Saturn, Influential Time-lords and Separatist Sirians

Standard
Saturn, Influential Time-lords and Separatist Sirians

Ever since new human began reporting on the incubus of his reflective observations, history has managed to precariously chart ongoing and endless conflicts between emotional and intellectual persuasions. Accordingly, this piece originally inspired to follow the title “Science Myth Exploded – Hu Man and the Sirian Factor” in a perhaps vain attempt to comprehend the whys and wherefores of turbulent historic saga. In emotional terms, could compassion and conscientiousness ever be separated? On reflection, the answer to that question is “quite possibly” but, as importantly, how does that reference to the dark mystery that surrounds competent understanding of the hubris of our species’ conception and evolution? The Human Genome Project, according to Alex Collier, had identified more than twenty alien genetic lines or traits of humanity at the time of his announcement. He is not a professional geneticist and perhaps that information is too liberal for academic tastes, but it serves the purpose of reinforcing the point I am about to make. In light of this I have also possibly been over liberal myself in the use of the word species. For clarity, I have continued to maintain terms that convey humanity actually mirrors different batches of hybrids when discussing occasioned associated genome makeup. Thankfully, analytical evidence emerging from the project largely supports the potential for that view to be pertinent.

It is only when I try and extrapolate the components that have been specifically used to build the human hybrid that I run into severe formal identity problems. One of the great mysteries, for instance, is how logic and emotion can work in unison at all. We invariably take the truth for granted. Our brains are dual-functional. Doesn’t that propose the ultimate paradox? The magnificent cerebral cortex seems to have been crudely bolted onto an indefinitely inferior animalistic contraption. Take away his golden crown and human would become little more than a conceited, sickly ape (and I have encountered plenty of those with cerebral cortex intact). Therefore it is vital to assess origins and assign apt characterisations if any comprehension is to be gleaned at all. Where did the cerebral cortex come from?

Geneticists may well desire to supply tyrannies of confusion by way of their explanatory resolve, but they cannot overlook the fact it is found in no other creature on this planet. Are everyday apes or other mammals without one blessed with intellectual prowess? At least one mature gorilla has been rated with a human mental age of six by psychologists. Work done under Hilter’s regime in Germany tested dogs’ philosophic belief systems communicated via Morse code. Results revealed simplistic values that would match those of human toddlers. Even so, ironically, if there was any materialistic part of us that might be blamed for “causing” our mortality, the cerebral cortex would be it. By chance, competent thorough understanding of latent holistic spiritual “activation” power would significantly extend potential lifespans.

Of course many other factors would need to be addressed too. Dedication to war and pollution would have to cease without compromise. I know of no one that can verify why our life force permits disease (and death). Responding “it just does” highlights the ignorance of those that supposedly care. Committed attention to discovery will demystify every cause. Also, it is all well and good to wish for an absence of war and pollution, but how can we practically be at peace with our environment and ourselves? Solutions are definitely hampered by a lack of “tolerance”. Therefore, what is the ceiling to “human group” tolerance? This is an important question, because if we are not careful, on our current path, we will destroy ourselves through pain of ineptitude.

Perhaps we need to look farther afield for alternatives. Have there been other alien cultures whose legacies are able to provide insight as to how to construct utopian existence? A symptom of the perilous human course has encapsulated an ongoing contest between “group think” colonists against (largely a feature of devoted oppression) “sovereign” individuals. The psychology of this is well argued by Jon Rappoport. I recommend investigation of his extensive writings. It is also a subject that made a brief appearance last article. By that vein, I was given the opportunity to introduce the Pleiadians. These enigmatically loveable “aliens” are arguably evidence of ancient attempts to “bridge” Martian and ape.

Apes, it might shock readers to know, are simple versions of “reptilians”. They, in this capacity, act as manifestly inferior agents of the “Draco” (an affiliation of reptilian and other species). The lower the vibrational state, the more a civilisation relies on emotional interactions and boundaries.  Nonetheless, under these terms, apes still vaguely demonstrate basic hallmarks of Draco Pteroid and Ciakar social character. Pteroids, I have mentioned before, are the substantive product of Pterodactyl DNA. Creating body “upgrades“, they used their own DNA template (coupling with additional genetic materials emphasising Tyrannosaur) to mould Ciakar. By comparison, incidentally, human being should be classed as best of breeds as he not only incorporates both DNA sets from the Pteroid/Ciakar catalogues but also has a range of other components (albeit in present crimped form most are dysfunctional) which make him cosmically “unique”.

Gene functionality is rarely understood. For instance, considering scientists laughably propose that, from their genetic perspective, Tyrannosaurus Rex is closest related to a “domestic chicken”, formal review of how plausible “divine” engineering might or might not function is more or less non-existent. It is largely this realisation that has motivated my desire to “fill the void” left by science. Correspondingly, the need to somewhat broaden the investigative range of this essay as a remedy for terminal ignorance has become my new transitional goal. It is clear that discussions should wander into alien territories if malfeasant science is to be thwarted and, in that regard, “Science Myth Exploded – Hu Man and the Sirian Factor” is simply too refined, too insular for the task.

To test sufficient understanding as to significantly why things have transpired in the way they have beckons for a stereoscopic “big picture” presentation. We need to go right to the top to get to the bottom of this. I must make discordant waves and ask the big questions if my dedication to the mission is to be suitably reflective. My decision on a new title sufficiently primed to open up mind doors therefore reads as follows. “Saturn, Influential Time-lords and Separatist Sirians” inspires me.  Hopefully essay conclusions will inspire my readership too and vilify that corrective adjustment. So without further ado, I’ll kick off with the first associated investigative quest.

Putting it bluntly, who or what are these vigilant separatist Sirians?

Though I don’t think ever mentioned “by name”, written and unwritten history reflects on their involvement with several Atlantis civilisations. That, therefore, seems the logical place to embark on the quest. In addition to what I revealed last article, I can now highlight the language of the most ancient Atlantis civilisation (on Mars) did not convey the negative or “anti” sense of anything. By example, my prior use of the word “dysfunctional” is untranslatable and possibly meaningless to those distant peoples. There is a reason for this, of course. There are always reasons for everything, even if reasoning appears unfathomable per insular cultural identity.

Going right back to the beginning, when time was at its dawn, insular negativity had such an effect on the whole, it began holding the serpentine Anunaki back. No one can precisely say “when”, but at some juncture the focus on detraction evolved to such a point it reached “schism”. Though the mythos had not identified an independent branch yet, group view concluded “Sirian” (as is known now) obsession was the cause of internal acrimony. Comparable incidence in human Earth communities identifies with the case of the peoples of India who annexed separatist Pakistan because sovereign dependent desire became incompatible with the whole. When developmental differences become too toxic for popular enlightened cooperation, the only excusable recourse is separation. Per almost identical philosophy, the ophidian group created the Martian-Sirian offshoot in order to purge itself of badness (to use the vernacular).

Here is where it becomes clear why Sirians refrained from the use of negatives in their original language. Once umbilical detached from the Anunaki, they presumed the cause of the crossroads was their infinite superiority (goodness) over the other.  Per these conditions, they supported an unyielding observation towards (belief in was my original choice of description, but I now feel terminology is specifically erroneous) “intellectualisation of truth”. Indeed their knowledge was considered so pure, lateral translation could not separate out “existential divinity”. Their knowledge and their tongue was effective “word of God”, or so they persuaded themselves. It was an outlook that proposed if creation’s direction was purposeful, then only terms that embraced progressive purposefulness were necessary. Negativity, by correlation, viscerally blocks positivity. As all words ultimately support or defy calculated practices, dissenting reflections were deemed creatively obstructive. Hence, anti-expressions were not possible in maiden Atlantis dialogue. There were no words to craft thoughts of this type.

Ophidian isolation did not come about through breeds of idealism. Instead, divisions were arguably considered necessary for survival. Sirians viewed control as something that was “preordained” (conceptually manipulated by the Sephardim under terms of “Ra” on Earth) and in order to append their engaging zeal, they have contaminated one star system not to mention destroying numerous heavenly bodies over the eons.  In conjunction with this, highlighted by Gnostic rebuke of the Pharisees for their forgetfulness, over-zealousness preceded an abominable “God complex”. Insular Sirian wisdom ended up supporting vicious enlightenment to such a degree that, for all other “alien” entities, submissive cooperation was the only “peaceful option” (for those ensconced within social range). Consequentially, the responding route to salvation reads like a tragic roadmap and though there probably was a need for linguistic negatives, none were permissible. Their precise formulas were so exacting, “experimentation” or divergence from “the path” was pointless. Perhaps ironically, the ancient Atlantis language did have several words that contextually conveyed reflective meanings of “no” so it was eminently possible to rebel.

Compared to Sirians, ophidian reptilians (which by no means identify with reptiles on Earth) are all faithless. Long did I presume they adore laws (the apex of control) but, strictly speaking, it could be said the reverse is so. Nevertheless they are certainly captivated by them and for good reason. Social networks are very important to Sephardic reptilians in particular. That said; each network has its own set of vibes, rites and traditions. Their lawmakers were very clever when they conceptualised popular solutions. They managed, somehow, to abridge all these differing vibes and other political considerations into something everyone could “tune to”. The solution was to zone and tier laws because standardisation only ever promotes cultural division and conflict. In some ways their justice mechanisms are identical to ours. The significant difference is they have managed to brilliantly integrate Sirian philosophy into active reasoning that supports the many and varied characterisations ultimately defining harmonious social interaction which are “society”.

Our “powers” brag about being Atlantis seeds in private, but the reality is as clear as day.  They simply do not comprehend Sirian mindset, and the reflective transition that is our legal system has been a vocational disaster from conception, demonstrated by the truth that our laws cause more disputes than resolves. Capability to discern and apply aspects of Sirian mindset is embedded in the mechanics of our cerebral cortex. One symptom which might almost be classed as a “syndrome” is the conscience. Though it is unfathomably permissible to break conscience (attested in the manner humans deny truth to benefit self) every one of us instinctively knows right from wrong. When conflicts with “self” arise, we learn to look the other way, procrastinate and deceive ourselves. Rather interestingly it is impossible to distinctly arbitrate “right from wrong” as judgement relies on the precise order of each specific set of circumstances. “Laws” in that way largely frustrate sincere contemplation leading to effective and honest verdict.

A prior article of mine topically observed the custom whereby certain Sephardic Jews allegedly drop the “hu” from human in recognition only of standalone man. Man, according to this unspoken tradition, appears to signify our reptilian nature by default. In other places I have informed readers the “overlord” creators (specifically angelic dragons personifying creative instructions of Ba’al) of everything that lives on our planet surface today revered Tyrannosaurus Rex as their most supreme result. T-Rex was ultimate man to them. However, after a giant war in defence of Earth’s attack from Sirian ancestors, (but for preserved DNA) creator dragons witnessed this prized livestock perish. Utilising assets from war spoils after the Sirians defeat, they first created a new creature (proto man) from pterodactyl atomic DNA archives as they did not believe tyrannosaur would succeed under the changed climate conditions. But they always yearned for the return of majestic T-Rex.  The new creature (mentioned earlier) is colloquially known as “Pteroid” of course (though the dragons provided it with a name that is hard to pronounce) and it went through several phases of evolution before its celestial DNA ascended to spiritual status beyond the reality plane.

Originally Petroid was a fusion composed of components loosely comparable with bat, dog and ape. Did the Japanese creators of Godzilla and King Kong innocently pay homage to this unwritten prehistoric history? A battle between Tyrannosaurus Rex and Pteroid sounds like a thrilling affair to me. In these times “men” were true warriors and stone tables (such as the henges) offered braves sanctuary. Soldiers only fought honourable battles then. The warrior tradition of man in fact only subsided relatively recently, perhaps in the last few centuries of our timeline. Fanatical commerce changed the status of war forever. Don’t they say Camelot was the last real battle?

Here we should not lose sight of the fact that human spent a very long period on Mars (I will review this in more detail later) where terms of living were very different. Armed conflict between civilisations was impossible there and this was partly because our cerebral functionality was significantly enhanced at the time (arguably as much caused by the atmosphere and foods we ingested as any other contributors). Pteroid, a spectacular ape, had no cerebral cortex. Dragons inexplicably chose to censor the most important component of Sirian heritage, or so it appears on face value. Nevertheless, upon careful reflection, we will learn that they deliberately opted out and I shall outline reasoning presently.

In the same article where I made observations about Sephardic Jews, I also determined that “hu” represents ape, whereas (in a sense by default) “man” supplants reptilian nature. This conclusion was such an oversimplification of truth; I sadly fell into the propagandists’ trap. In fact, if comparable physiologies were available for cross-check, reinforcing my earlier sentiment, scientists would determine all apes are reptilian. “Hu”, preserved history informs, is an abbreviation of the Celtic (breakaway Jewish) God Hu Gaddam. After reviewing crude antique characterisations of appearance, there is no doubt that this is a “late stage of evolutionPteroid which visually presents as the mythical Satyr (one with a reputation for wine, women and song). Occult “Satanists” also often depict it as a strange goat headed, bare breasted “furry” figure (a gross pantheist metaphor). Are Baphomet’s “metaphorical” wings symbolic of mastery over the heavens?

Rather upsetting the apple cart, according to unofficial Jewish folklore (biblical texts are extraneous of the Talmud), human (Eve) was created from the side (rib) of man (Adam). Adam (which should not be confused with the gnosis of Sophia’s Yaldebroath), in this context, can only refer to the anthropological missing link Neanderthal ape. This particular version of Neanderthal would have also had to have been contemporary with the human creation date of around 125,000 years ago (i.e. if we could find a perfectly preserved example embalmed just before the cosmic war of 120-102,000BC, it could be used as evidence for human). Was, as tradition postulates, the Sephardic Jew to have rejected “Hu” in service to “man”, then a whole different emphasis is being tendered. In which case, what is the significant difference between “stylised ape” and “ape”? Do the Jews refer to the “reptilian” aspect after all?

Before I can make any credible assessments, it is important to thoroughly investigate that other “missing link”; the one that science refuses to even contemplate. Sometime prior to Pteroid’s destined transcendence to higher dimensions, his replacement was commissioned. Presumably largely the result of pressure from persistent dragons seeking vilification, it was decided that a new type of tyrannosaur would wander the Earth in Pteroid’s wake. Tyrannosaurus Rex was a vicious creature but it also had an extraordinary mind (I explain about true dinosaur brain functionality in this article). Liberally akin to modern day alligator and many times more productive than any human rancher, it could coordinate the herding and ambush of livestock with chilling efficiency. Nevertheless, there was a spiritual aspect to them as well and they could independently discern right from wrong. Parents, for instance, would never attack their own offspring.

A good example to demonstrate just how unstable tyrannosaur DNA can be when applied to hybridisation scenarios is emphasised in the celebrated account of late Phil Schneider’s violent subterranean encounter with a so-called “Tall Grey”. This “smelly trash can” (as Schneider poetically described it) is part “Zeta”. “Zeta” (presumed to originate from Zeta Reticuli) Grey Beings tick on the popular level of Star Wars “Yoda”. Amply revered as “wise men” by their peers, a reputation backed by a long history of logically passive “king making”, they are hereditary devout pacifists. Even their flexible DNA is widely used as a hybrid “binding agent” (perhaps similar to putty in construction). Enterprising reptilian Sephardim presumably theorised a more comprehensive gene application would make the ideal companion for tyrannosaur to tone down the aggression.

As Phil Schneider (lucky to survive the laser attack from the creature) painfully learnt, their experiment didn’t work and the legacy was a vocational catastrophe. Suzy Hansen informs us in her book “Dual Soul Connection” that Zetas (she calls them “Grey Beings”) draw vegetable matter through the skin by way of sustenance. Tall greys ingest nutrients in the same basic manner with one significant variation. Uniquely, they immerse themselves in special vats of living body fluids (blood and sinew) to “feast” heartily. Aside from their constant dreadful aroma, they suffer from vocational paranoia making them irrationally violent towards unknown “invaders”.

Thankfully the few subterranean Tall Greys that survive today are dying out, unable to naturally reproduce

Hybridisation is rarely easy or quick. For instance, I am led to believe the replacement for “Pteroid” took upwards of 700,000 years to gestate properly, and then further 100,000’s years were devoted to perfecting process results. Though Pteroids are given credit for the final creation, they originally referred affairs to superior dragons who, in turn, invited assistance from external (extra-terrestrial) entities prior to the project going ahead. Engagement led to political repercussions and some parties that had been excluded ended up giving input. The result was an alien mixed gene compound became the basis for the conceptual new direction of tyrannosaur/man. Simon Parkes has correctly reported that higher echelons of the Sephardim regard any form of menial work as something below their status. Therefore, reflectively, senior Pteroids would not likely have had hands on involvement with incubation cycles. Here I would imagine that exported aliens with the greatest interests in genetic assets took on roles as proxy team leaders to organise the equivalent of ((i.e. some other culturally versed formulaically cloned entities) today’s so-calledrobot grey” technicians.

Putting alien DNA and other potential “contaminants” to one side, new tyrannosaur man (Sephardim or “Ciakars” as they are colloquially known) was actually substantively old Pteroid. This not only meant that the Sephardim (group) were bestowed with identical Sirian genetics (ones absent of cerebral cortex remember), but, in effect, they were also technically humans too. Knowledge of which places considerable ambiguity as to the meaning of possible orthodox Jewish persuasion that “hu” should be stricken from man and rejected at all cost. Do they take umbrage at the dragons’ preference towards tyrannosaur?

In addition, why do they name Adam (a decisive “hu” relative) “man”? Are there “different connotations” of the term man at play here? Is that what I’m missing? There is another possibility too. Most illogically, separatist Jews perhaps refer to the hidden Sirian qualities expressed by our magnificent brains. This would be illogical because it would mean Genesis is misinterpreted. Under those auspices, “Eve” would have to be the wife of Adam (who is “man”) and not “human”. Confusions allayed, is man worshiped because of his divinity (cerebral cortex)? If so, how can we substantiate how “having a conscience” significantly changes adaptation to applicable collective social relationships?

Expanding that line of thinking, would it to be possible to attribute a different background to those “missing links” I highlighted earlier; a background that perhaps lays the foundation for other successfully purposeful Sirian hybridisation projects? My last article made the startling revelation that Pleiadians (in relation to this planet) were aquatic mer-people. I also exposed details on their extraordinary mentoring role over Atlantis civilisations here. Notably the largest social community under their umbrella was actually located where Egypt is today. Few are aware that the Great Pyramid of Giza landmark was a Sirian-Lemurian joint venture project constructed over 30,000 years ago to mark the boundary between Atlantis and Mu. I personally recall living near pyramids in a past life incarnation, a time when everyone seemed to wear lightweight pale linen tunics. If you stood too close to a pyramid it made you feel weird, presumable a consequence of wireless energy.  Then lands were heavily submerged and the amphibious Pleiadians found refuge in waterways.

In correction of last article’s vital omission concerning Pleiadians

Thankfully occasional perceptive commenters do exist. Last article something drew my attention in the responses section (were “cosmic forces” at odds with me? I had to rescue the item from the website spam filter). Completely overlooked prior, suffice to say, never before had I rationalised that [Atlantis located] Pleiadians were a “reptilian” species. Incidental information this may be, but to me the news is as Earth shattering as it is demure. My much earlier confusion over Rosemary Klem’s surrogate Atlantis seabed setting encompassing the conceptualisation of a “utopian” Sephardic generation base now makes absolute sense. Be it she perhaps doesn’t realise the place never existed in the fully material sense, it may dramatically come into being for experiencers when Earth shifts to Tara (i.e. Holographic Universe One transitions into Holographic Universe Two and old reality turns into new reality).

Surprisingly evidence supporting real physical marine Pleiadians is not unknown (and thus means they don’t formally class as aliens). Filmed on numbers of occasions, their skeletons (significantly, the skull is “ridged” and fingers fused to make a flipper) are also occasionally found, most commonly washed up on beaches. Even so the Pleiadian energy field has always caused me the greatest angst. Only now do I understand why my impression of its menacing nature has persisted. Parried against popular propaganda (origins possibly from channelled Sephardic sentiment), Pleiadian nature expressed in terms of that which is close to the divine doesn’t configure at all. Corresponding body energy field calibrations better compare to Charles Hall’s zany “Tall Whites”. Never a subscriber to coincidence my thoughts burn over plausible connections between Pleiandians and Tall Whites. Fortuitously perhaps, my yet-to-be-published book “The Birth of Hu-Man-ity” theorises the Tall White is version three human, created less than 50,000 years ago.

Though I can’t say for certain as I know of no autopsies conducted or their results, I would place a very large bid on the prospect that Pleiadians either have a cerebral cortex or a sufficiently functioned “version” of something that can produce similar intellectual qualities.  Therefore, if that was so, the “missing link” engendered in the Adam and Eve tale is neither configured from “hu” nor “man”. Under such circumstances (vilifying highlighted Jewish superstition) it must refer to the Pleiadian connection. To add gravy to this formula, they would have been already part-way (humanly) compatible, courtesy of an enhanced reptilian status, In fact, I would go further to promote the idea that human is actually an adapted mer-man (hence our slightly webbed fingers) rather than a primary ape. Though it is important to add, other extra-terrestrial Pleiadians (presumably of different hybrid mixes) are known to be land dwellers (such as the Nordics?) and may be, consequentially, very different in nature. In conclusion, evidence of the human hereditary Sirian path is most likely courtesy of Pleiadian lineages. Specifically I identify them as version six in “The Birth of Hu-man-ity”.

Visual footage of active reptilians is much more limited, but stock is out there. The most celebrated film consists of several minutes’ inspection of a presumed deceased figure wrapped in some kind of “foil” preserving blanket. It is at least seven feet tall, according to the commentator who also claimed it had attempted to “accost him” and he had been forced to subdue it in “self-defence”. Myths describing occasional unannounced interactions with similarly imposing figures suggest smaller human is far stronger than reptile men. It is said they are “easy” to render unconscious. African tales also highlight their severe allergy to titanium metal. Tradition has it warriors’ donned suitably tipped spears in order to ward a successful eradication campaign on the southern continent over 15,000 years ago.

Returning to the celebrated video (incidentally shot sometime in the 1990’s); I wonder why a preserving blanket was used. It seems to me the only logical explanation would be that it was there to shield the body flesh for a planned autopsy. Did one take place and what was discovered? Assuming the corpse was inspected by career professionals; were too many similarities with the human anatomy found for comfort? Did they, to their horror, find the sex organs (in particular) were identical or almost identical to human? If that was the case, what are the implications? Does it mean they can engage in physical cross-species reproduction with humans? Was this to be true, it places a whole new avenue of consideration regards Jewish superstitions over the status of “man”.

Referring to the Adam and Eve saga once more, genetic materials (biological dust) “taken from Adam’s side (rib)” could have been either used to clone or hybridise another model. The text clarifies that in order to regulate procedures, “God” had to place Adam “into a trance” (i.e. or under anesthetisation). So if the Jewish view concerns a specifically “reptilian” crossbreed, then no obvious reference is made in the Adam and Eve story beyond possible suggestions embroiled in the “fruits of the orchard” (genetic traits) analogy. In fact, the “Fall from Grace” episode states that after “God” learned of the “snake’s” corruption he “did something” to reptiles to make the women dislike them from then on.

Why women in particular and how did the relationship fare prior to this dramatic [genetic] alteration?

This is an important question as, currently, mirroring evasive Sasquatch, there are no DNA benchmark references available for scrutiny, or, better, none have been publicised. Is the reason for this tinged with conspiracy? Might erstwhile phantom findings, if released, categorically disprove politically favourable conjecture concerning spurious connections between man, ape, human and reptilian? Perhaps these, in part, would ridicule current rigid key genetics principles. I need to stress that, in its use here, the term reptilian does not demark earth surface reptile genetics or their embodied character traits. In fact, if the truth be known, Sephardic humanoids are ostensibly cold blooded mammals that possess a dual (hot/cold) pulmonary system (fused in humans). As with our deep sea squids, they can activate either system at will, but prefer cold blood status because it makes them more “rational”. Perhaps the terms “in a spurt of hot blood” or “it made my blood boil” in their suggestion of over calculated passions when used gives some credence to this as a consideration.

The way that the human brain functions ensures characters of men and women branch differently. In light of this, I would like to pose the unobvious question; could “reptilians” of all genders be more closely aligned to the human female than the male? Perhaps some answers might be gleaned from “tangents” here. We’ll see. First I note, and though they are rather similar looking to us in some ways, generally speaking, marine Pleiadian men appear essentially ugly when compared against the symmetrical beauty of their females. Mermaids found their way into old sea shanties. Why no mention of the men? Next, I posit that emotional human women are tuned much closer to the reptilian [black light] spectrum than logically lateral [spiritual white light] men. In addition, Sephardic reptilians strut like ostriches and our women are sometimes endearingly called “birds”, “chicks” because of a more quirky (avian-like) gait than men (other than Latino chicos perhaps?).

When the Sephardim were originally created, one of the key DNA asset holders were the Lyrans (lions). Is this possibly why, partnered with those avian similes, our women regularly attract feline nicknames, such as vixen, cat, tigress and so on? Interestingly Simon Parkes (who is married to a Lyran) once profoundly stated on camera (AMACH interview) that his (Sephardic) hosts told him the creature with the closest similarity to them (on Earth) is the household cat. Does this account for the considerable number of surviving topical ancient Babylonian statuettes and corresponding pharmkaxia (sorcery – witch’s cat) tradition? It doesn’t take a wild imagination to visualise what breeds of tyranny Pharaoh Akhenaten faced.

Beneath the veil that confounds Babylonian tradition is another sensationally enigmatic figurine which is commonly used as prop to illustrate deep historic reptilian “conspiracies”. Theorists have yet to contemplate the significance of the item correctly in isolation though. Made from useful quartz rock, the depiction of “reptilian woman with baby” formally substitutes as a lamp. With correct technological knowledge, an electric field can be generated through the rock which causes it to profusely illuminate. Though complimenting effects are as beautiful as they are efficient, that is not the point I am trying to make here. Beyond clearly raising mother and child to “angelic status” (by the light transformation), why did the Babylonians model this objet d’art on such an unusually serpentine theme?

Perhaps it was a “joke”? Did the Babylonians ever favour the surreal? In answer to these questions, they certainly upheld a tradition of accountability which meant specific attributes were sometimes presented as “spiritual metaphors”. I cannot personally fathom the poignant specific symbolism of reptilian humanoid holding baby as it makes no obvious contextual spiritual sense to me. This considered, there are two prominent oddities. Firstly, the statue is an unmistakable fusion of reptile and human woman perhaps some might say in same the way “Marvel Comics” could have envisaged subject matter. In that respect it is the only Babylonian icon of its kind to my knowledge. The next point is a crucial one. The baby is suckling. I have no intimate understanding of reptilian birthing culture, but the way the (rather disproportional) infant is held and method used seems identically human?

Therefore, it seems to me, that the statue stands out more as an experiment with surrealism if it is to be evaluated in purely symbolic terms. Taking into account that this would have been a mesmerizingly beautiful feature lamp in full operation (though the illustrated photograph may be of a cheap copy); might not the figurine most logically attest celebration of a very special event? If it is “surreal” it is one of a kind that arrogantly defies contemporary artistic culture.  Even so having no details on reflective politics that might credibly place thematic content puts me in an academically ambiguous position. My only option is to attribute pragmatic guesswork that promotes valid considerations so stable in resolve, reconstruction will forge a watertight case with sufficient spectral basis as to prelude the full decoding of this enigma.

The figurine itself might best class as a possible clue, but, when you have no more than that, well, a glimmer must be embraced as your plausible route to salvation

There is something recognisable about the structure of the woman’s face. To me features look remarkably Hassidic. Perhaps that is a coincidence, but these inconsistencies all add up when attributing the “big picture”. Given the eye catching suckling act, could the reptilian woman have been holding a human baby? Was that the significance (in the sense of specialness) of the artistic portrayal? If it was a human baby, why was it being held by the reptilian woman? Was she the mother? Alternatively, the statue maker could have been making the wide statement “reptilians are just like us”. I find the prospect of this as the summary effort towards a “thousands of years old anti-Racism campaign” hard to believe, particularly as (to my knowledge) there is no supporting written legacy. Besides, in my opinion that message is far too insignificant for an iconic lamp of great beauty – an heirloom for prosperity. Unless she was a perverse nanny or some kind of domestic help, clearly it was her child, or why would she be suckling it? If that was so then, once again, it would hardly validate the role as centrepiece for a timeless spiritual masterwork.

Assuming the reptilian woman was a real life figure, I would imagine that she was regarded as sufficient important to have been featured, in fact I think she is no ordinary reptilian woman though memory of her would have been very much localised to the period when she existed. Factoring in the baby’s expected (though unusual) human status points the niggling finger at the father, who, one would guess was of equal or greater social status than the woman herself. Her husband would assuredly present a huge clue as to reasons behind the celebration embroiled in the enigmatic figurine. Could this individual have been a Babylonian monarch? It would place a good circumstantial theory that their offspring were the original “chosen people”? Perhaps the suckling baby was the first blood Jew. Is that why primal Jews called themselves “Sephardim”; in homage of royal reptilian traits?

Maybe this is true, but there is a monstrous nagging consideration impeding the philosophy. I have witnessed a strange white dragon that carries what looks like a greying toupee uneasily perched on top of its head. Never have I identified a reptilian with cranial or facial hair other than a rather wispy snake mannered entity whose unruly straight locks are invariably accompanied by a broad coat hanger moustache. Was not Samson’s power in his hair? Of the numerous reptilian types, a humanised T-Rex miniature in brown flying suit approached my third eye one time. It was unmistakably hairless. Large salamander headed Draco surveillance men have none either.

Indeed, most of the furred creatures in their ranks seem to stem from enhanced Pteroid. At one time, in conjunction with my exo-political tuition, I was shown hundreds beyond hundreds of widely differing dog-faced “humans”. Strangely, many seemed vaguely recognisable. A similar catalogue exists for the lizards. Reptilian women, I stress, will sometimes wear an equivalent of the Islamic burqa or a light chiffon veil which seems to somehow unnaturally float above the head without aid. Causal effects bring out facial features, permitting profiles to beam. Why on Earth do orthodox Jewish women wear wigs? Was this an overhang from the royal reptilian brides’ public disguise? It is said the reason Mohamed’s wives chose the burqa as attire was to make a “fashion statement”. I find that explanation and the accompanying legacy banal to the point of disbelief.

Too many contradictions and no definite answers yet, but that should give sufficient ponderable “food for thought”. There is one other viable consideration not evaluated thus far. Dozens and dozens of generations past, if the pure blood ancestors were indeed a more substantial part reptilian than normal humans, they would have likely been bestowed with special powers making them standout when compared against the other. Does not biblical Genesis state “the sons of Gods became heroes of men”? Were those related Gods reptilian Sephardim? As for explaining the hair paradox, perhaps unused to such genetic features, the mother of the original child (in our statue) personally revered the trait as a miracle and that tradition stuck. Perhaps prior to conception she felt her genes were so divine, the male would have no reproductive effect. Hassidic Jews, it must be said, do seem to come with inbuilt superiority complexes.

Next step would be to determine how we can assign character/behavioural differences that distinguish Sephardic qualities from Sirian ones. Then there is the lingering issue of the missing link.  Pleiadians seem the most likely suspect here; but they also need to be evaluated in separate terms (i.e. how do they bring the “reptilian” and the “Sirian” out as combined personalities?) for clarity of vision. Before I undertake that arduous task, it is important to substantiate whether a human being could be [sexually] attracted to a reptilian and if there is sufficient genetic compatibility to enable physical procreation. One only has to tentatively refer to “Shakespeare’s” Macbeth to form a very dim view of the “great beauty” scenario. In fact legends present “witches” as hideous as they are wicked, menacingly cackling in dank caves. Renowned for brewing “Pharmkaxia” (remember the earlier “cat” connection) potions in large black cauldrons, apparently preparing omens of the most devastating detractions, they were also able to magically transport themselves to unknown twilight destinations simply propped on household brooms (though this is as popularised, they actually each used a type of staff on the lines of biblical Moses’ celebrated model. Aladdin’s magic carpet is an intriguing variant).

Contradicting this account, I regularly read (current and historic) memoirs (sometimes providing sordid details) of human encounters with presumably “other dimensional” reptilian women and these illustrate very different profiles. Reptilian women in question are invariably noted for their transfixing charisma. To elaborate, accounts detail vivid experiences presented “in the flesh” (as it were), figures are habitually shown as magnetically attractive, supremely elegant in posture exposing the general epitome of grace. I can personally confirm a reptilian’s “waggle” would put any human woman to shame. They have an athleticism combining with aesthetic energy which tantalises an enormous surrogate power.

Far from merely left to the imagination, their acrobats can jump higher than houses without assistance

If there was anything specific I could single out as truly remarkable, it is probably the eyes. Upon first impression, they dazzle. To compare with average human, ours are dull glints matched against their melting pools. Their eyes transport them beyond any casual human beauty. This is a feature in Pleiadians too whose are relatively larger and, again, more striking than humans.  Thus, in response to my initial query on the question of attraction, I could well imagine a human king being transfixed by his reptilian female counterpart. The “genetic compatibility” factor may be harder to address. However, if we (humans) are extensively reptilian (i.e. playing on the notion that ape is a version of reptilian), I can see no reason why there would not be reproductive synergy. Perhaps the truth will emerge if science comes clean on their research of things that don’t formally exist.

Victorian era British-Jewish politician Benjamin Disraeli is attributed to have confirmed prolific Hassidic marriages into the European aristocracies. Perhaps love did factor on occasions, but I feel sure most were primarily a “means to an end”. Superficial evidence this may be, but does it provide insight as to the comparable political objectives of ancient Babylonian royal marriages? Philosophising over the clinical efficiency with which the Jews managed to infiltrate European aristocracies suggests any in place reptilian alliances with Babylonian royalty would have been just as fecund. There is another possibility.

Going further back in time, long prior to the Babylonian civilisations, were all humans intercepted by reptilians to cause genetic exchanges before the notion of leadership and monarchy came into being? Second or third generations of the original hybrids would have meant there was a very small (perhaps under a hundred individuals) contingent to manage. If this is so, living humans today would be the genetic consequence. Expanding considerations, perhaps the greater mystery is why reptilian/human partnerships haven’t stood the test of time if humanity is the legacy. Continuing this line of thinking; how would a human without direct-input “reptilian” genetics function? If the matriarchal reptilian-human is a universal product (I am impressed with the work Nikolay Levashov did on reproductive placement of chromosomes here), it would certainly explain universally distinctive character differences specifically coming out in female offspring.

To clearly sort out unmistakably human “virtues”, we need a straightforward method to distinguish Sirian qualities from reptilian ones in man. I have already discussed female mannerisms, feminine features and unique balances of judgement that separate men from women. The Gnostics used the word light to symbolise logic (or logos). Soulful emotional qualities herald from darkness and these are harboured by the quantum layer (outlined at length in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”). From a theoretical police line-up, Sirians could be very quickly and simply separated out from reptilians. The former have no social law and order, whereas the latter is obsessed in perfecting systemic infrastructure.

This is not to say Sirians are without arbitrary bodies to impose judgement on social offenders or reptilians are incapable of bucking the system. Quite the reverse is so as modern day Earth’s “Prison Planet” concept is loosely modelled on utopian Atlantis civilisation. Sirians assumed roles as royal luminaries at Atlantis, acting as the keepers of the records and fraternal judges. Considering this, remarkably, when compared to reptilians, they are not notably ethical. Indeed it could be argued ethics were alien to rule breaking Sirians. Their wider renown was for integrity and scruples that were beyond reproach. To highlight the major incompatibility; without numerous, very carefully defined strong laws to guide them, those affiliated with the Sephardim simply could not or cannot be trusted. Paradoxically, human can either follow or break regulations, depending on mood!

I mentioned Charles Hall’s “Tall Whites” in a similar context earlier. To elaborate, at a past Sydney talk of his I attended he made a number of suggestions that gave credence to the notion a link exists between them and the reptilian “Draco” hierarchy. Distinctively a short silver multi-purpose “laser pen” (that almost killed Hall) carried by them is a “standard issue” accoutrement for affiliates of an extra-dimensional cosmic police force. More importantly, expanding thoughts on how the general reptilian philosophy over ethics differs from ours, Hall mentioned his “visitors” would never trespass into a “forbidden zone” even if their lives depended on it. Herpetological insignia has been widely promoted. Memorable Draconian motifs include stylised serpents, double eagles, fleur de lys and many other faunas (in particular). Though areas generally off-limits are invariably cordoned behind indistinct barriers (sometimes invisible), they are always marked with brand logos in some way. To a human “off limits” screams too intriguing not to investigate of course. Even with the strictest warnings (sincerely outlining dangers of trespass) someone out there is always reckless enough to attempt to break in to uncover secrets.

Reptilians are very pedantic social beings. Microcosmic circles of trust dictate the interconnecting function and purpose of communities. By comparison Sirians are loyal “loners” (possibly explaining the aloofness of Pteroid). Reptilians are opportunistic manipulators. Sirians will stand by their beliefs ‘til death. Reptilians can be cautiously humble when on the losing end of a dispute. When not violently “seeing red”, they also have an extraordinary capacity for patience in aggravated circumstances. This comes out as fight or flight psychology in man (ironically something clinically blamed on the reptilian brain). Subtly similar, Sirians will act first and think about the consequences afterwards in crisis situations. Simply put, they would tend to make snap critical decisions, whereas we and the reptilians are more inclined to pontificate and procrastinate than remedy flaws, however gaping.

In some ways unsurprisingly, the clear boundary that best allocates reptilians from Sirians is the functional central nervous system (or brain). Ultimately delineated relative approaches to life can be boiled down to the application of conscience versus compassion. “Oddity” human is a collaboration of the two, although those of us that demonstrate dishonourable loyalty err towards the reptilian side. Impartial honour indicates strong Sirian traits. This would explain why that for societies without conscience, laws are absolutely vital in defining civilisation’s cooperative needs. Logic driven beings would find similar laws either patronising or insulting. Reptilians (as with humans) are part Lyran. Inherited Lyran fabled storytelling prowess may be the fuel that ignites ever present fires exploding as political melodramas in our societies. For instance, this is significantly why I believe propagandas exist. Stories bereft of truth had no place in Sirian communities. Their information was impeccable. That which did not desire political focus simply wasn’t recorded (a criticism levelled at the ancient Babylonians suggesting civilisations were either extensions of or modelled on Atlantis?).

There is another prominent difference between the Sirian and reptilian relative approaches to living which menacingly reflect in human. Sirians wallowed in fundamentalism. By comparison, possessing no capacity to be faithful, reptilians were egregious idealists (although their over-zealous observance of laws can also be a form of fundamentalism). Considering the evolution of the interpretive twisting of values that support our common word “love” serves purpose to demonstrate this catalyst well. Gnostics tried to persuade their listeners that love was a humbling before divinity and, therefore, to exude purposefully neither required idyllic settings nor reciprocation from those in vision. Under these auspices, the Gnostics directed love indiscriminately, regardless of whether efforts were welcomed or unappreciated by affected individuals. Per crude conceptual rehashing of Sirian “laws of attraction”, true love now has been bastardised into a crass symptom of passion (compassion is the derivative). This, above all other things, highlights the scurrilous reptilian nature of man.

Idealism and fundamentalism successfully came together under Pleiadian administration (in that capacity leveraging the Tamarian). They did manage to perfectly harmonise laws of attraction. However, was a like model ever to be adopted by humanity, it would generally mean intolerable repression for the masses, who would be devoid of opportunity for personal sovereignty and absent of any prospect of honest liberty. In a sense the Tamaras (“Ra” as the ultimate authority over sun cycle) is the human model. Under very different circumstances the main reason Sirians and reptilians were able to forge ahead with their joint venture cooperative technology city (currently buried under mountains of polar ice, remnants of an ancient moon the Vedas name Falla) was they shared the same ultimate civilisation goal.

Though each approached harmony (i.e. “peace”) by different means, the end always justified the journey. Intriguingly, Pleiadians religiously coveted tyrannies of happiness to effectively model their infamous communities. Accoutrements of their success on Earth remain today. So-called “Greek” relics and other structures now under oceans provided technologies that aided collective communion. Communion (“popular destiny”) is the only way to aggregate beliefs into some sort of workable group proliferation. Historically glorification of Ba’al is the best active example. Though terms may have changed, originally “Ba” stood for praise (in the sense of worship) and “Al” meant God (or Lord or master). Al-Lah compares as great or almighty God in the Atlantis version. Jewish “El” is a sloppily pronounced diphthong. Communal group channelled energy to cause deification of idols. Here fevered populism recalcitrantly locked horns with religious doctrine in the beatification of Ba’al and the establishment had to put an end to the crisis.

Differences between Sirians and reptilians are marked. The former is celebrated for original thought which apparently fuels genius qualities (something I am routinely accused of), whereas the Sephardim extend template driven replications to the limit. If it exists they can copy it. If it doesn’t exist they can fabricate a holographic simulation. Sirians remained generally distant of Atlantis societies. Tending to manifest at moments of importance or tragedy, they were perhaps regarded as something like mystic priests (when rarely observed), normally clad in plain robes and sandals (Viracochas of Mayan legends?). This is likely more evidence of the Anunaki surrogacy. Babylonian tales concur with moralist clerics addressing particular venom towards intoxication. I wonder if Jesus is an archetypal mystic hermit. The evolution of Christianity developed radical philosophies supporting communism (a derivative of communion) by the mid nineteenth century. Damning ambitions of those attached to establishment (ancestors of clerics that forbid “populist empowerment” worship of Ba’al) control agendas is why the “deflecting” socialism ruse has been gradually implemented and will become the universal tool for herding populations.

After the fall of Atlantis when most of the Sirians had evacuated Earth, reptilians gradually replaced the vacuum with their own brands of reclusive monk sects. Unfortunately the Sirians would have rebuked some of their abhorrent common practices with feverish ardour. Reptilians resonate with traditions, like to build institutions, value marked social roles and other identifiers. For instance insistence on “pink for girls” “blue for boys” typically sounds like one of their customs. Religion to them is nothing more than a tool that might be used to “socialise” human beings beneath their cultural banner. They have a great belief in the rite of passage, so tend not to indoctrinate their own young. However if there was the desire, implementation would be managed via some kind of religious methodology. That aside, humanity has significantly and effectively grown to abridge both Sirian and reptilian worlds, therefore (considering Sephardic reliance on the “Ra pact” foundation for engineered false reality)…

What impact does this have on the objectives of Anunaki hierarchies?

Factoring hereditary progeny, why did the Sirian-Anunaki surrogacy go so horribly wrong? Why was “teething” newly created human whisked off Earth just in the nick of time? Did that Sirian infiltration actually ignite the giant cosmic war of 120,000-102,000BC (guestimate figures)? Was the great flood event (circa 35,000BC) aimed at human or Neanderthal? There are other questions that need to be addressed after I re-evaluate who/what the Anunaki (group) are and, from that appraisal, draw whatever synopses are possible regards character and purpose. The title of this essay might well appear to be an odd choice given content thus far, as neither Saturn nor “influential time-lords” have actually been mentioned. Contextual relevance is about to become starkly apparent.

“Influential time-lords”, for instance, is a euphemistic reference to the Anunaki of course, but I first would like to tackle “Saturn” before I explain why. There is another connection with the Anunaki here, but it is more subtle and generally unknown. Characteristics of “Gods” supposedly worshiped by the ancients are common knowledge and much pertinent information is available for public scrutiny. Those that bother to seek will find consistency in accounts. All the established chronicles illustrate that a “lead” God either covets meteorology or the “air”. For instance Celtic deity Beelzebub presided over heavenly weather systems. Greek affairs below Zeus (Lord of the heavens) were rather more complex, but they do implicate the “theo” legacy. Akhenaton’s prime deity Amon is master of the air and everything unseen.

“Influential time-lords” relevance now palatably understood; let me introduce a different side of Saturn. I am reluctant to refer to the American agency NASA for “basis” as it produces bucket loads of deceptively malignant propagandas in support of the government’s populist brainwashing agenda. However, details released about Saturn’s satellite view firmament are so strikingly accurate they deserve tribute. The famous rings may arguably be composed of water (isn’t this a sign of life?), ice, rocks and dust, but they (and I quote) also have a “remarkable effect on weather systems”. Thinking of possibilities (considering that Saturn is not the only ringed “gas planet”), if I wanted to create a cosmic calling card (if you will) that identified with the Ouroboros, well, I don’t imagine I could do better than Saturn.

Continuing this line of thought whilst erring on the side of the positive, of all the places in the cluttered cosmos, Saturn seems an ideal location for a God of Meteorology. Weather systems are only “arbitrary” because scientists theorise this is so. The same scientists theorise an obviously designed universe is evidence of “randomness”, so I tend to take what they assert with “big pinches of salt. Anyway, I can’t say for certain, but I would hazard a massively plausible calculation that Saturn acts as stronghold host to the Anunaki. Sit tight, because there’s more. If we can authoritatively rely on this presumption, logic becomes fascinating.

Before I resolve how everything “connects up”, here is a little more historic background. According to Babylonian myths the Anunaki left Earth in a huff immediately after trying to wipe out “constantly chattering” man with a giant flood. Slavic folklore that possibly “fits” may refer to an event that is believed to have created the Russian Black Sea. Another is an extraordinary weather incident that apparently opened a new water way which covered (what now is) Northern Africa and sections of the Middle East. Unfortunately existent physical evidence could only be classed as “circumstantial” today (notwithstanding the Sphinx’s mysterious “water erosion”) mainly because waters rapidly subsided over few centuries to leave vegetative marshlands in their wake. A lush, wet paradise region persisted for an excessive period afterwards.

Was this the hubris of Eden?

Personally, I favour the latter (North African flood) event reflects the Anunaki outburst as remarkably large Neanderthals were located there at the time. Dates I have mentioned before (circa 35,000BC) and shortly after the dramatic exit, Atlantis Sirians “returned” with human clans in tow from Mars to settle in paradise. Was this the original Promised Land or “Eden” (Aden is a modern day country of that region)? It would have been located in the heart of today’s Middle East, perhaps Israel even! My inadvertent mention of an inner Earth Eden in prior articles suggests a contradiction here. Though it does appear so on face value, I can now confirm more than one (perhaps each pronounced slightly differently) Eden or Edin location. The identifiers of the Promised Land could well have used Eden as its namesake, particularly if name usage was generally synonymous with paradise.

Potentially referring to the Anunaki, I am constantly perplexed by those “dark” Earth energy fields exposed in Zoroastrian philosophies. This reflectively lends me to favour that religious doctrine is much more ancient than postulated through conventional historic analysis. Tainted evil territory would surely refer to promiscuous effects of the Anunaki as the most probable candidate. If this is so then origins of Zoroastrianism seem destined to predate 35,000BC as that is when the Anunaki “vacated Earth” according to folklore. The problem is very few (if any) humans existed on Earth prior (evidenced by the lack of skeletal remains?) as most would have returned with the Martian Sirians after the Anunaki exodus. In which case, the underlying purpose behind Zoroastrian instruction remains a perplexing mystery. Could, by chance, have chroniclers been light on information and failed to observe precise terms of the Anunaki exit? If there had been a transitional ascension instead then plausibility might allow the placement of a much later date on affairs that vilify Zoroastrian traditions. Has Anunaki influence over man merely been minimised since 35,000BC?

Parried against the Almighty, Anunaki are very minor Gods. Accordingly the Saturn spectacle is only visibly ever-present for residents of the local star system. That presence coordinates weather which goes some way towards demonstrating they are the precise same Gods the ancients chronicled. Additionally, in Robert Morning Sky’s “Terra Papers”, extra-terrestrial visitor Bek-ti informs us that the fundamental functional purpose of a God is “to be worshiped” which would cordially correspond with the need to be spectacular. At some point the Anunaki clearly saw benefit in colonising other planets and this would have prepared their move to Earth. Formally (according to again circumstantial ancient sources) they initially operated in partnership with Sirians.

I place a “best guess” chronological figure of this liaison around 500,000 years ago (admittedly summarily inspired somewhat by Gilgamesh’s epic), but I could be way off the mark here (given that numbers of stone tablets detailing the famous “Kings’ List” are possibly permanently “lost’). Genetic compatibility may have been correct, but it did not promote successful surrogacy. In fact the heavenly conceptual alliance morphed into a practical fiasco. Morally biased Sirians simply would not go through with aspects of the role that fell short of their approval. Unfortunately, the list of detractors was so long many key ambitions of the Anunaki were simply ignored. This left them between a proverbial rock and a hard place, quite literally stranded without bodies, though spurious later arrangements with the Draco (implied in the capture of Inanna [Venus] saga) possibly remedied failings of the Sirians – something I will reflect on towards the conclusion of this essay.

It certainly seems most probable that Anunaki visitation and attempted rule over Earth replicated efforts on Saturn. Saturn sounds a lot like “Satan”. So much so, some posit that Saturn is in fact a mispronunciation of Satan (also incidentally known as the Blessed Star). I have gone to some length to expose the errors defining gross misinformation that distorts the iconic star’s reputation in other writings. Summarily, the problem is this. There were two separate, very different scenarios that have been confused for one another over time. The Satan star worked to distribute white light which eventually formed seven “heavenly” dimensions. Overwhelming pressure from “left behind” extraneous matter (subsequently composing two black dimensions) that was initially “blocked” by Satan but ended up building to such an extent; it collapsed the virtuous star (i.e. this event is colloquially known as “the fall”, something science  routinely refers to as a “black hole” occurrence).

Hardly denoting the transcription of all evil (unless “evil” here is a cover for goodness), Sat-an in Sanskrit literally means “Almighty God above truthful purity”. Quite the reverse is so, I think, therefore here’s my suggestion. Could a very different Satan have been the poor pronunciation of Saturn? Did, over time, the negative connotations of both terms become so indistinguishably engrained they effectively “fused” as one?

In the modern age of rationalism, the importance of mood is largely overlooked. Though I question whether they truly parry with each of the heavenly dimensions, Gnostics attempted to describe Almighty God in terms of fundamental states, such as “grace” and “nobility”. This is not evidence of cultural insanity. Rather, embroiled philosophies are so seriously objective; they are very hard to understand by those trapped under spell of rationalism. For example, in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, I describe how certain atomic formations might influence an object (e.g. take the stigma attached to a mountain range such as Dylatov Pass) to such a degree it exudes “character” in the form of positive or negative vibes (professionally exploited by Hammer Horror movies, I would emphatically imagine).

Suffice to say, there is much that humanity doesn’t (or refuses to) comprehend regards the meta-functional purpose of existence. Could the Anunaki, in situ on Earth, have unwittingly caused such memorable turmoil for us then that prophet Zoroaster felt obliged to warn his brethren? Under Sirian surrogacy, one would have imagined the Anunaki’s great priority would have been to place Saturn in popular focus in order to ramp up committed worshiper conversion rates. There’s no point in putting mesmerising rings on Saturn for no one to witnesses them. Slavic-Thracian etymology conclusively conceptualises Yahweh as a grim reaper figure. Regularly occasioned in biblical folklore, was usage “consistent” and does it always refer to the same basic entity (such as the Anunaki)?

Human, tradition infers, was genetically unauthorised (because we possessed mindsymbolised as knowledge). This angered Yahweh who wrathfully banished us from the Garden of Eden. Did (in this instance) Yahweh association with “the Anunaki” imply the “Garden of Eden” is the whole ofconfigurative Earth”? Human’s mind capacitor (knowledge generation the side effect) is the cerebral cortex and this is a definite Sirian asset. That could have led to a cosmic war generated by parties that saw human evolution as a potentially devastating existential threat. It would also explain why the Sirians stepped in to save humanity. Factoring in their passion for freedom and unrequited truth; it seems to me that perhaps Anunaki objectives would be regarded as far from “fair” when pitched against those lofty standards. For instances, had they have chosen to apply cunning in place of logic to cultivate order in the form of political “wins”, decorum impresses me that the Sirians could under no circumstance have supported their desired existence.

Humans admire trustworthiness even if we (as individuals) ourselves are not very trustworthy. Because clever authoritarian institutions cast the impression that laws provide “freedom” (or freedoms – I never did appreciate the plural use of that word), people accept indirect tyranny because it is not “in the face”. Perhaps Anunaki determination to proliferate their unrequited “needs” also turned out to be dramatically unyielding, causing conflicts with personal interests of infinitely inferior human being. Regardless of “gains” from the connection, such as inexplicably heightened individual power, perhaps that overt oppression fostered extremely negative sentiment against the Gods. Is that the basis for the “evil Satan” (aka Saturn) confusion that haunts today’s ever willingly gullible populaces? As an aside, it would be good to know how much Sephardic malpractice has backed off that tradition.

Reporting on one of her many publicised conversations with a red dragon, Eva Draconis once presented a vital off-the-cuff remark which stated (to the effect) that all (bar none) of the pope’s cardinals are Draco “assets”. Clearly the Sephardim have an imperious agenda too and this is currently being administered by the Catholics (via the United Nations, whose manifesto exudes hybridised Theosophical philology) under terms of Zionism (aka “globalism”). In this context, impending human ascension (I have discussed many times before) is at centre stage. Probably the most important question in review of the transition (if it happens) concerns power sharing arrangements that, due to expanded corresponding dimensional bandwidth, would permit Anunaki direct involvement in human affairs again. How will their style of demagogue despotism conflict against maintained reptilian tyranny? Interestingly, Babylonian annuls record various royal marriages between Draco queens (possibly Antrutinram, Tressuntbaa and Tamutakbu) and the Anunaki.

What are the implications?

Ignoring the plausible consequence of a reoccurrence of all-but-forgotten satanic (Saturn) cultural programming by the Anunaki, does this suggest any new role for the Sephardim will merely act as corrupt backstop to enable their grand destiny plans? The conduit was opened through Ba’al before. There is another rather more disconcerting potential symptom from this that deserves explicit configuration. From the Anunaki perspective, was humanity deliberately created as a way to bridge Sirian and reptilian nature as a “complete” entity in order to calculate a more compatible future host? Time-lords see past present and future simultaneously. This ironically places an even bigger question mark as to which angry God “Yahweh” really represents. Before the Sirians separated from the Anunaki, they were an equal part of the divine serpent (existentially, the human kundalini is lowest manifestation of the caduceus [Moses’ staff?] and that is why Sephardic “Ciakars” connect via chakra points). The forlorn attempt to rekindle original status failed because possessed Sirians lacked desired reptilian qualities. Here’s why I said “ironically” before. Could “angry Yahweh” symbolically represent “Sirian” but only in relation to the aspect creation of human? (I.e. God here simultaneously banished and rescued mankind)

Reptilian qualities would be essential to permit limited corruption under “reasonable circumstances”. In this context, human would make a much more “balanced” reptilian/Sirian hybrid (per outlined Anunaki goals). We have values but are sometimes equally corrupt in the way we apply them. Vitally, from the genetic engineering perspective, our magnificent cerebral cortex would surely class as the living piece de resistence of materialism. Proportionally Sephardic, all humans are also tainted with alien (Lyran and possibly others) DNA. If ancient Babylonian texts are accurate, was the reason for Anunaki marriage into Draco ranks primarily motivated by potential remedies for genetic unity complications? The Anunaki could not have been certain that extraneous alien content wouldn’t disaffect future surrogacy plans without initially testing compliance. Prior, they presumed related Sirian compounds would work and paid heavily for the complacency.

I discussed Ra occultism at some length last article which included the proposition that the Anunaki currently govern our sun by proxy. Additionally, in confirmation of the “Inanna” (Venus) underworld myth, cosmic sources have validated knowledge that they presided over an experiment to convert populations that live in the heart of Venus. Though I am not aware of any publication, the main purpose behind Venusian Valiant Thor’s hapless attempts at brokering arrangements with the United States government in the 1950’s coincided with an Earth comparative breakdown of social order at his home planet. There is some kind of very strange life system inside Mercury and this may well be an Anunaki project too.

The point I am trying make here is their manifest ranges should be regarded as “cosmic forces” rather than anything that might be remotely compared to tangibly “bodied individuals” (even configured as the many forms of Ba’al). Indeed, the Vedic cobra with a thousand heads metaphor indicates the Anunaki might simultaneously occupy legions of people if that was their objective desire. Some entities swallow up entire planets for breakfast, such is their range.  Nevertheless, occupation of a star is a whole different facilitation category. My book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” emphasises all planets are encased stars. There is a world of disparity between “closed” planets and “open” physical stars. Physical stars are expressively multi-functional gateways. One function is to preside over times (time, generally misunderstood by conventional science, is a cosmic “script” that “hovers” in a standalone dimension providing the basis for everything that exists or doesn’t exist via atomic “calibrations” or astral projections). Consequentially, any cosmic force that assumes star governance status is a time-lord as well.

Here’s the danger. Should they choose to do so; time-lords can repackage existence in such a way that it alters the cosmic flow of chronology. Only those situated in “impartial containment” might discern changes (with consistent time). For the experiencer, for the barely conscious human, time is nothing more than a reflective effect of perception. Perception, attached to this environment, supersedes all other considerations. Whereas it might possible (for human) to stand back from perception, so few seem to have the latent ability it is pointless for me to dwell on the consequence. Instead, I must bitterly conclude that humans (unmovably reliant on illusory reality) are physically unable to decipher time shifts (beyond spectacularly illogical ones that defy anticipated continuity).

That, thus far, ends my quest. Nevertheless, (I feel) If this essay is to be remembered as enigmatic writing, it would be good to finish things off with a few “poignant” unanswered queries to keep my audience keen. Readers choosing to volunteer active roles in the discovery tour are cordially welcome provide interesting (but please, nothing crass) feedback in the comments section too. So, without further ado, I’ll start the ball rolling with three unresolved topics (that perhaps one day will kick off separate future research projects).

If the Anunaki are able to alter chronologies of any timeline attached to their cosmic stream, how might this impact humanity when we ascend into a dimensional frequency compatible with their bandwidth?

The next part is rather more challenging. It concerns the complexly unenviable position of the Sephardim in relation to our ascension. How will the transition affect them? To note, perhaps the ascension is the most compelling reason for their ongoing visceral attempts to halt human DNA progression, including establishing numerous resonating “so-called” frequency fences (via the false matrix) and their commissioning of the dramatically disastrous Philadelphia Experiment. I have highlighted details of this operation before. In brief, Zeta hybrids were commandeered as “brains” in an attempt to disconnect Earth from the sun’s direct magnetic field. If it had worked the sun would no longer be “visible”. Instead, ramped up moon generated sunlight (recalibrated to exact Draco specifications) would have “looped” with Earth causing mankind to be totally under the spell of the Sephardim. Does this highlight their reticence to “trust” infinitely superior time-lords?

Serpents and Ladders – Introduction

Standard
Serpents and Ladders – Introduction

heaven-earth-yin-yang-fateAs a child I regularly played the board game snakes & ladders with friends. Nevertheless any associations with subject matter used in this entry can be assumed incidental as the game merely attempts to mimic undulations of fate. Instead, here thematic material is broken into two basic streams of investigation. Initially I shall create an essential background featuring the Annunaki serpent (posh word for “snake”) lines. There I will attempt to lay the foundations bare and clear up some of those long established, divisive cultural myths. I have discussed the progressive links highlighting how Annunaki genetics have devolved as the human genome before, so this series of articles will go into much more detail, hopefully going some way towards resolving clarity. Assuming everything goes to plan, introductory findings will neatly compliment part two: revelations as to the complexity of human genetic ladders. I have noticed normal attention spans are insufficient for my extraordinarily “different” content. Therefore, shorter articles might bless a more worthy audience and I shall treat the first part as a prelude to part two. There may be several subsequent instalments as requiring subject matter is highly convoluted.

Because science behind the human genome project has more-or-less preconfigured conclusions to fit on-going politically charged preconceptions, information value to sincere researchers is limited. Though a couple of serious wobbles to the scoped narrative line have accorded an occasional borderline mainstream Media frenzy, these protests have always dwindled to teacup size. This is partly frustrated by the fact that trawling trillions beyond trillions of symptomatic markers (emphasising amino acid chains) does not even approximate the scope of real DNA as it is absent from normal sensory perception (or the five senses). “3D” DNA is confusing to laymen as non-nucleic mitochondrial genetic materials contain a shallower snapshot of development than male nuclear components. Consequentially mainstream science has made the extremely deceptive myth affirming announcement that the human came out of Africa courtesy of eight females dating somewhere between 250,000 and 350,000 years ago in order to support anthropologist Richard Dawkins’ babble. The information does camouflage some truth, but synchronistic revelation as to “what” will have to wait for my next article (part two). Bizarrely, the most authentic evidence of our genetic history can be found in the atomic layer as that is where fundamental existence progressive decisions are executed (and why radioactive fallout affects genetics). Unsurprisingly our vain scientists haven’t thought of looking there, or perhaps this is not so unexpected given establishment man Albert Einstein’s rabid fear of the quantum layer.

Zeta Grey Being encoded in crop circleOne of the problems facing the modern commercial scientist is an entrenched mindset which is a combination of “training” and “peer group pressure”. For instance (and this perhaps may appear a little facetious of me), the supposed master-geneticist Horace Drew runs a comic strip analysing “crop circles” under the pseudonym of Red Collie.  In that capacity, as well meaning and mathematically enlightening his calculations have been, he has failed to glean any association from the molecular frequency balls contained within a number of pictograms he has attempted to decode. It is remarkable one that preaches fervently about the ills of cognitive dissonance so obviously demonstrates acute symptoms. All “crop circles” (that are not made by mischievous human beings) are created by or for Grey Zeta Beings. There are numerous superficial clues, but no other entity can produce this style of multi-faceted logical transcendental messaging. British expert Colin Andrews has identified over a thousand different messages in a single diagram. Though I don’t regularly share his reflective opinions on meanings per se, he pushes the point home.

02Changes in atomic frequencies are going to be directly associated with our so-called “ascension”. I am heartened by Michael Tellinger’s subliminal suggestions on the topic. He seems to know that silica quartz will open doorways unattainable for carbon based life forms. If only our scientists treated the atomic layer with a modicum of reverence they might start getting somewhere. Lack of reverence is a symptom of institutional arrogance. Symptomatic academic ignorance is no better demonstrated than by offering up my sacrificial lamb, Horace Drew, again. He, the scientist, has sadly shown he is blind to truth outside the narrow window of his expertise. To make matters worse, he is in no way the exception to the rule. Far from it; just about everyone in power is held prisoner by maligned, trendy belief systems. Mainstream science assures, with scant exception, thou shall not break those divine Newtonian-Cartesian empirical preconceptions. Therefore, were anyone to suggest that extra-dimensional influences located beyond the material plane inexorably affected “what is”; they would literally be branded insane by vogue populists and metaphorically horse whipped for their trouble. Yet the sour truth reveals that, due to our limited sensory perceptions, there are aspects of existence that simply cannot be experienced without consulting the dreaded paranormal. Beyond what seem to be impeccable calculations, Horace Drew’s “crop circle” “decodes” have been as much about preserving his credibility as any credibly honest investigation into the truth.

It is worth noting that Suzy Hansen’s book “Dual Soul Connection illustrates human illness can be deciphered by coloured energy fields emitted by all living bodies contradicting Louis Pasteur’s celebrated pioneering achievements (though these I argue are deceptively contrived, twisting the evidence and accompanying opinions of the micro-biologist genius, Antoine Bechamp). Less famous spiritual healer, Barbara Brennan, identifies the same basic emissions as swirling energy vortices. Neither of the variants of these fields is visible to the eye nor can they be scientifically measured as such. Particular light frequencies do pick up human auras as rainbow effects, so mainstream science has not been completely shut out. The issue, of course, is not invariably mainstream witness and data collection unless political stakeholders order the process rigged. Problems begin and end with interpretations that churn out those endless babbling theories.

It is only when it comes to decoding truth that the picture clarifying how genetics work is rendered very cloudy, given the lack of attainable credible evidence that might validate conclusions. At best the image is “cropped”. What of those strange, fantastical, enigmas captured by ancient peoples that are clearly adrift of popular historic assessment of calculated intellectual, technical and human civilisation development, for instance? The result is truth is further distorted by deliberate and erroneous literal interpretations of deep historic texts geared to tweaking reconfigurations that validate current popular opinions on the way things were as best they can.  For instance, the preconception that ancient man was savage denies any notion of advanced medical practices. In principle all science-myths characterising the creation of Stonehenge propose savage cave men irrationally, mechanically and inexplicably carted very heavy stones (each weighing multiple tonnes) several hundred miles by hand for no specific reasons guided only by the whim of superstition.

cosmic DNAWhere present, in general, historic anomalies deemed worthy of scrutiny are mostly judged “unexplainable coincidences” when unfathomable.  Were science to seriously consider arguments supporting the notion that ancient knowledge goes way beyond anything we have in modern times; it would have to reinvent those heavily guarded narrative lines. Dissenters would certainly question whether the Chinese I-Ching document conceals a giant genome project in its own right. Just because the way information has been conveyed does not supplement modern scientific notation styles does not make it any less valid. Those than pander to this academic culture assure the quest for truth is always out of reach, particularly given earlier sentiment (i.e. if anything of substance could be categorically proven, science missionaries would go to any lengths to disprove it in order to preserve the status quo).

So-called historians are also infected by this type of fanaticism. With what started as a devilish act of promising research, Joseph P Farrell’s conclusions in “Genes, Giants, Monsters and Men: The Surviving Elites of the Cosmic War and their Hidden Agenda withered to such a degree, they were frankly an embarrassment. Readers never learned what technologies, which parties and reasons or even if the speculated giant cosmic war “over Earth” 2.3 million years ago actually eventuated. He did surreptitiously introduce the Annunaki, but never elaborated his views on the concept. Given wayward, in some ways, equally irrelevant prognoses dressed as alternative histories by Zechariah Sitchin, Michael Tellinger, Gerald Clark and other genre theorists, perhaps this was the correct approach. Even so I was disappointed by Farrell’s book, which I felt copped out. The truth was too hard and commercial editorial pressures put an axe to the contents.

An army of unscrupulous shills anticipate suspected debunking opportunities to preserve political diktat. Farrell never stood a chance even if he had have “fessed up”. I make no secret of my admiration of Graham Hancock, but he is in the same boat. Very little acceptable concrete evidence can be used to buffer against “the system”. Look at the hysteria over the Bosnian pyramids with mainstream and alternative movements galvanising absolutist campaigns either “for” or “against” truth. Even there, should researchers favour “for”, datelines are entirely wrong as projected. Hancock’s appraisal that the Egyptian Sphinx was constructed in Earth’s precession cycle of Leo is correct. However, it was the one before the last term so dating is around 25,000 years out. Fortunately, Zeta truth codified in “crop circles” is infallible (even if Horace Drew fails to comprehend it). Suzy Hansen identifies her hosts simply as “Grey Beings”, yet these (as described) bear all the consistencies associated with the genus that originated from the Zeta Reticuli star system. These days the place is apparently overrun by reptilian conquistadors (according to Sanni Ceto and others), so I very much doubt they still have civilisation headquarters in the region. In fact I am informed by numerous sources that various humanoid types act as Zeta associates and, similar to Draco (reptilians), they have an active breeding/hybridisation program of their own.

At the highest dimensional levels, control and management of genetics is everything. By that I mean all other reasons for existence and existing are superfluous in comparison. We, pedestrian humans, are preformed and this means we have a very limited insight range compared to say, the Zeta Grey Beings. Matched against cosmic master geneticists of the ilk of the Anunaki, our skills/potential to comprehend would be classed as infantile, at best. At the very top of the existence pyramid are the Anunaki (one “n”) and these Time Lords are so lofty they approximate “God” in existential form. It is difficult to say with absolute certainty, but intuition tells me that there are potentially numerous mini-versions of the Anunaki too in the capacity of, shall we say, departmental premiers. Whether all or any of these have reached “Time Lord” status as well is debatable.

Gyan_chauparOne of my regular visitors provided valued feedback on her pertinent liaisons with extra-dimensional entities furbishing additional clarity (and some intrigue besides) on the “senior” Anunaki Time Lord status. Indeed, her extra-dimensional informants did more than that. According to her version of their message, the “Anunaki” are viewed as “rogue” Time Lords by those in the know as they manipulated essential fields and processes in order to expand their own power base to the detriment of existence in general. Our [time] path is evidence of one of the numerous corresponding cracks in the network infrastructure as a consequence of this manipulation. Sixto Pas Well’s Ganymede (Jupiter moon) migrant visitors marginally corroborate the consideration as they have said in no uncertain terms that our time line simply “doesn’t exist”. Nevertheless, having been able to interrogate my blog visitor’s sources directly via subspace (note: this method is not infallible as I am often given a snapshot that matches the way I observe “reality” rather than direct transference of the host’s perception, encouraging variance and potentially significant gaps or shortfalls in interpretations of truth), I question whether they refer to “ultimate beings” or the mini-version subordinates. As they (my blog visitor’s sources) appear to me to be located in the light realms (dimensionally below thought), I wonder whether they can effectively access and thoroughly represent a complete picture.

Because there are so many different states, things can become rather complicated even after rudimentary scrutiny. Therefore understanding bequeaths the names Annunaki, Enki and Enlil are not merely fanciful, exotic-sounding titles but actually all mean something. In addition, they could have each been used thousands of times or more over the ages to signify entity types or groups that satisfied generalised qualities around nominal word values. For instance, Annunaki is broken into “An”, “Nun” and “Aki”. In prehistoric terms this means An represents the “binding invisible force”, Nun is compared to “darkness” and Aki the “light”. Extrapolating further, prehistoric darkness is not our superficial “colour” (or lack of), but, rather, the primordial dark waters of infinity. Some might suppose this adequately supports the fertile ooze notion evolutionists claim was at the root of man’s origins, but not so. The term refers to space which contains a sea of undetectable atomic matter used to create everything; animate and inanimate. Hearteningly, mainstream science is beginning to see the light and some cosmologists argue space behaves like a giant ocean now. As for “Aki”, well this is closer to bedazzlement, will or spirit as the combination of maternal/paternal (essence) so it is much, much more than mere light.

Those that have pawed through rambunctious literatures produced by Zechariah Sitchin will have encountered his versions of the notorious Enki and Enlil. Just because he has a large posthumous following, does not mean his opinions are beyond reproach. Frankly I insist, knowing what I know, they are littered with errors, guided by a rancid political agenda I can only assume is directed by Israel’s right wing archaeological establishment. First up, these characters (Enki, Enlil, Inanna et al) were not Anunaki beings. Anunaki is something like an entire network of stars separated by trillions of light years. How about that for a single organism! One might intelligently argue that some representations of Enki, Enlil were Anunaki cohorts. Indeed, original manifestations (way beyond physical) were known only as Ba’al. Confusingly, given biblical connotations, Ba’al is the group name given to the different guises of “God” (Annunaki/Anunaki) in manifest form. Are you all still with me? The “double n” Annunaki is complete non-manifest God and “single n” Anunaki(s) is/are [incomplete as aspects of the whole] manifest God(s). Ba’al personifies as many guises as required to satisfy the complete refracted character of the Annunaki distributed by Anunaki overlords. Initially, per that dynamic, it could be argued the two most significant divides (if that’s the right term) are individual versus group. Thus, concepts Enki and Enlil were born. Translation of terms offers succinct clarity. “En” “Ki” compares to “spirit inside” (or individual traits). “En” “Lil” is “the whole converging at one point within” (or “everything” represented as “a single entity”). That is why ancient texts posit Enki as the gene master (augmenting individuality) and Enlil as “God” (common view of the “great group”).

revit-octopusIt is difficult to precisely ascertain the reasons for snakes or serpents as the original preferred form. I have theorised that creatures living in ocean environments might prefer flexible bodies to manipulate tides, but it may be something else. In fact the octopus might best approximate the optimum original manifest design but it was later, several hundred million years ago, that dragons personified those sleek, slithering bodies that would truncate to become boas that populate our dense tropical jungles, vipers for arid, desert regions and numerous other basilisk varieties suiting varying lifestyles on modern planet Earth. The serpent once was the dragon and Jacque Fresco (of the Venus Project) knows they learn quickly. I feel the adage “once bitten twice shy” cannily assesses ophidian libido. Enki, in physical form, is best described as an alligator headed sea monster supporting multiple tentacles. Incidentally, located in extra-dimensional realms exists a strange humanoid, very tall and crocodilian headed. It is not the slightest bit fierce, but has such a fearsome intellect; it would put the brightest human to shame. Unable to manifest in the plane we call D3 or “third dimension” at all, Enki [the “being”] had extraordinary psi-powers, including refined telekinesis, the ability to spontaneously create and numerous senses unavailable or alien to humanity.

To configure all the layers that comprise Annunaki, as an absolute, would effectively accommodate several encyclopaedias worth of differences. Suffice to say, housed in those undiscovered sections, reptilian and dragon hierarchies have their own immaculate angels etched from light making human obsessions over morally good and evil (at best) deeply prejudicial. The term “light” is so oversimplified per our binary definition; it is surprising we glean even an inkling of spirituality (that which comes from star light). Our mundane observation of spectral qualities, separated by colour grades, is a small part of spiritual consequence. Albert Einstein’s ignorance neglected a number of fields that would help distinguish the many different states of photons currently disguising light’s potential. For those that think I am being unfair, principled materialism assures that if everyone was rendered sight blind and without memory, the light spectrum would cease to exist. Imagination, to these philistines, is worthless. Einstein was a clansman that replicated anything that satisfied his peer group and mischievously rejected all considerations that appeared to contravene ambition guided by precipitous order to the detriment of true science. The great human group has no right to censor existence as a consequence of limited experiential capability. Open minds will herald a renaissance for true science.

Discounting the differing manifest proto-physical effects that might be witnessed by ultra-sensory beings, each broad “type” has its own domain with underlings at varying stages of development overseen by angelic guiding ambassadors (with their own hierarchies). Thus, there may be 100’s or 1000’s of increments in the chains of command all the way up to utopian nirvana. Could we call these divine ladders? I delve into this, though perhaps not quite in the same way as outlined here, in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” (PayPal donations preferred by those that take the purchase plunge & the cheeky request for $800 contains a lot of tongue). Sentiment that challenges standard material belief systems hides the queasy question; is DNA concrete evidence for God if processes are found to be ordained by the atomic layer (i.e. light)? Light is the only “thing” (or, perhaps, material essence is better terminology) human can manufacture out of nothing. If it isn’t considered to be something, why don’t the rules for existence change? Empirical science observes symptoms, looks for material (measurable) causes but invariably applies rancid philosophy by the seat of the pants. Philosophically, science has no idea why fire exists as the manifest chain reaction and physical effect of combustion. The technological quacks may as well boom “God decreed it and it was so”.

According to ancient sources, the Annunaki (i.e. group God as the premise for manifestation) “split” at some distant past. This point marked a significant percentage of intent choosing the face of man over the serpent (even though, initially, the face of man grotesquely appeared on an octopus like monster). Those that refer to Genesis 1:27 “So God created mankind in his own image….” have been mostly guided by superstitions that suppose meanings. In isolation the verse, simplistically, suggests the creators of man looked like him. Let us review the appearance of our creators to verify accuracy here. Pteroid mammalians (creators of man) perambulate upright, having arms, legs and basic facial features (i.e. possession of two ears, a pair of eyes, nose and mouth) matching ours. Ciakar reptilians (creators of hu-man) are the same. Thus, the (Draco) makers of man and human were superficially identical and if either was used as evidence they would validate Genesis 1:27. The verse was not some kind of mumbo jumbo pulled out of thin air by intoxicated primitives.

Dragon angelOf course, detailed scrutiny of truth would reveal a very different picture that pieces together polar extremes ranging from human comparable extraordinary likenesses found in aspects of body parts or design to unfathomable resemblances that are quite unrecognisable as anything to do with man. It is for that reason there is a chasm that separates “creators” and “created”. Also, we must never lose sight of the fact that they are very different to us. In accordance with the ascension, Annunaki spheres of influence (figuratively represented in the Mahabharata Bhagavad Gita as the “Zoroastrian style” 1000 headed cobra representing a fan of intentions from despicable to supreme) could return at any time and this will perhaps exacerbate differences between us and them (our Draco masters). These differences have been visibly played out as global control politics and that ever more corrupt extra-terrestrial “disclosure movement”. Even so (and this might well shock some of you) I am heartened to note that in addition to their angelic light beings, senior ranked Ciakars and all fully fledged Pteroids possess wings that supplement other accoutrements. Adding further credence to my explanation; is this not what an ignorant, superstitious “primitive” might expect of angels?