The Mystery of Hu Gadam and Pantheism

Standard
The Mystery of Hu Gadam and Pantheism

nature8Perhaps there are many reasons for my exposing the unbreakable, intrinsic connection between Hu Gadam and pantheism now. Most recently, I have seen an increase in the abuse of the use of the connotation “Lucifer” (a relative of Hu Gadam), so that has definitely enflamed my motives (as I am a truth giver). 40c0de8dc71764052fca5d37fe86afdaOf course the word Lucifer is meaningless without connotation, but I shall check the etymology to try to identify when the corruption began. Well, I’m pleasantly surprised. Its origins, I am casually informed, come from Latin. The words luc or lux combined with fer mean “light bearer”. This, my common source informs me was the common name given to the Morning Star. The same source cites an obscure Christian Morning Star connection with Satan, which I must say is rather interesting. As I inform readers in my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, Satan was a heavenly body. He/she/it was no ordinary star as She [I use in place of they to confuse auto-editor] was the very first luminance (check biblical Genesis 1:3 John 1:5 or Revelation 21:23) to bless the cosmos. The will of the feminine obscured and overwhelmed the male aspect of existence for a while, but when the outcast male discovered the flaw, error came into being (Nag Hamadi: Apochryphon of John). She, our Satan Star, collapsed under the weight of remorse and is now known as the Black Sun which has theoretically been identified by NASA as being located somewhere around the centre of the Milky Way. The so-called Mayans (what the Lemurians became or turned into) knew She was the spigot of our universe as expressed by their water wheel analogy.

morning-starEven so, beyond the uncomfortable fact that everything is one and the cataclysmic enterprise, Satan, has no lateral connection with Lucifer as neither does the Morning Star, all feature through consequence of serious consideration as to what pantheism is and its portrayal of life as a continuous system canonised by its cycles. Last post I emphasised the lack of power human beings convey. Compared to universal beings we are far less significant than atoms. Moreover, we have demoted our potential. Yet, in my book, I boldly state “we are God’s fingertips”. In other words, a single human life (as a complete experience) might feel like gently brushing against ferns while walking in the bush to them (the Gods that we represent). Everything we thought was important, including all those new age dramas expressed as end of world crisis, is irrelevant to them. To them everything will change to suit the cycle and if we have the collective ability to make it so or not, so be it. The new way, while it lasts, will give just as much life and, if not, the weak and sickly will succumb to those with greater power and resolve. Thus, rebirth is stronger and more resilient. That is the process of illumination. Human beings love scapegoats. We can’t face the truth unless it suits us and that is why we constantly seek surrogates for our mistakes. Blame game is the pre-inclination of man.

Robin HoodLucifer, the entity, does not exist, but pop culture conveys messages that are instinctive and clear. There is a general fear shared by human beings. This may be the result of the baggage collected by the group consciousness over the eons. However, no energetic personification (in absolute form) has any relevance. The fear is aggregated fantasy which has been exploited to the greater degree by the creators of illusion (fiction writers, film makers and so on). It is a genre and that’s it. There was an entity, being very much connected to Earth’s inherence and He was a rogue. The use of the word “rogue” expresses its most positive aspect in this instance. I cannot say this roguish entity was symbolically comparable to Robin Hood, for instance, but that would demonstrate how enterprising rogues can mean everything valiant for the human heart. In this particular case, our roguish entity was deeply connected to Earth’s inherence and, in that capacity, defied white light order. He proposed, drafted and implemented an entirely new life cycle system that had never been considered before. It was and is a system that has been famously paraphrased by evolutionists as “the survival of the fittest”. Whilst Darwin’s conclusions are almost entirely wrong and the evolutionists need to expansively redraft their ideas as to what “survival” is and what “fittest” really means, the balance of life is an exaggeration; a hyperbole.

Though the entity in question (our rogue) has an unpronounceable name that partly sounds like wind striping away at crags in a sandstorm, “Lucifer” has been the convenient substitute. There is some malice to this, as the entities that support white light systems are the ones that invariably provide channelled information streams for “the benefit” of Humanity. They know the way they use Lucifer is not comparable to the one of human, can I say, folklore. In my opinion they deliberately transfer the negative connotations to receivers for added impact (i.e. propaganda from the nether regions). In fairness to them (I regularly relay direct accounts of human sloth on my other blog) what better way of pricking the attention than using one of the most historically enigmatic names of all time? Be your own judge, but don’t ever be swayed into assuming that light beings and other guides work exclusively for your best interests. They have their own agendas which promote mutually beneficial payoffs. Over the years I have met a lot of people that were important members of Atlantis society (white light sensitive). As I discuss in 450,000 Years of Unquantified Earth History, the peoples of Atlantis were not human, or, rather, key societal figures (those stakeholders in community interests) were Martians complimenting one aspect of our DNA. Modern human reincarnates tend to assure themselves and others that you (as individuals) are masters of your own illusion. Values tend to predictably replicate white light traditions, such as strict vegetarianism.

dinosaursLast Australian tour (2013?), Sixto Paz Wells, famous for his relationship with fourth dimensional Lemurians (though I don’t recall him identifying them as such), explained how “Lucifer” intervened with Earth’s development. They said that “Lucifer” was an archangel (sound being: sound beings are higher in dimensional status than light beings). He (Lucifer), alone, hatched a new way, a new beginning for creation. The other elders did not like the blueprint, but neither could they find fault nor just reason to oppose it, so it was authorised. Beginning around 340 million years ago (give or take) the life system now known as the dinosaurs changed existence. Blue Dragon Desktop BackgroundI haven’t checked and don’t really care when the palaeontologists claim dinosaurs began to evolve. My sources are far more pure, far more accurate and far more knowing. Putting examining pertinence, precision of dates to one side, it now starts to get interesting. “Lucifer” only hatched the plan, which was complete. Underlings facilitated orders. There is a gap in my source material, but it is easily guessed. I don’t know exactly what commissioned the dragons, but they were the geneticists that manufactured all the new Earth species prototypes using their own DNA catalogue. Dragons now have evolved as fourth to fifth dimensional life forces but will always be cohorts (progeny) of Ba’al (plural). Unlike Ba’al (all unique beings without reproductive capability) they are a species set with numerous varieties. ea6d8636422896800aa69bf7e8fa1097Ba’al is the [group] manifestation of the Annunaki and, therefore, “Lucifer” must be the being(s) the Sumerians called the highest God (God almighty). By deduction He must have been a stage/state between Ba’al and the cubed light Annunaki.

Sumerian devotion would not be understood today. In those times, for the early period, humans knew the power of communion. That changed when the Draco (assisted by Zeta Grey Beings) installed meta-physical frequency fences which acted as limiters on our DNA.  alien-graysWhen I use the term Draco (Pteroids and Ciakars combined), I feel sure this was a control freak initiative and that can only point to Ciakar (reptilian) meddling. Whilst the Zetas offer a chirpy, witty, laid back veneer, underneath they too are patiently obsessive. To the intrepid third party observer, hideous appearance, extreme mood swings and carnivorous sexual behaviour is all that separates the Ciakar from the Zeta. For my analysis, every single recognised Zeta-human channel either wears a powerful reptilian overcoat or has conspicuous viperous guides. Hu Gadam’s influence has been forsaken. We, hu-apes, have been dismembered for our heads don’t understand our bodies. That is why sexual potency is the greatest of all “sins” (sic) and children must be “innocent”.

Though the Pope Lick Monster is another inspiration for this post, there are many tales and artefacts which demonstrate a very different reality to mainstream proprietary history. Goat-like humanoids of different sizes and statures are rare but far from unheard of. A rather strange skull with significant horn protrusions disappeared from an American local museum not that long ago. Other objet d’art have been supressed in different or similar ways. This suggests someone does not want the evidence scrutinised. If that is the case, logic further impresses that stakeholders in the preservation of current mainstream history illusion have the most to lose by allowing scrutiny of potential loose cannons that might break it. In addition, though the Pope Lick Monster is interesting and authentically unusual (I would, perhaps, go as far to say genuine), it is not evidence of Hu Gadam. A more likely cause might be one hatched by the miscreants behind the New World Order and so-called “powers that be”. Be very clear that global politics is controlled from above and string pullers are not-of-this-Earth in the traditional sense.

Pope-Lick-MonsterThere is one photograph I know of depicting the Pope Lick Monster. Courtesy of Photoshop, the print has been coloured and disambiguated in numerous ways. It could be a fake, but it is so convincing it could be natural. Energy signatures never lie but sometimes can confuse readers into false beliefs. In this case, if all viewers that witnessed the image shared the belief it was real, energetically it would become “real” (but only in consistence with the beliefs). Hypothetically, there would be a lingering doubt as all viewers of the unknown are natural sceptics. Per this paradigm, the item that is a fake would become real through consequence of belief only, but that reality would also be tinged with doubt (due to the sceptical nature of man). When I analyse the picture (above) from the energetic perspective, I do indeed find a lingering doubt in favour of authenticity. Does this mean it is a fake after all? No, because the energetic signature could also be its authenticity and lingering doubt might represent the fact the exhibit had been played around with (i.e. enhanced using Photoshop). So, in this case, an energetic reading is not going to be very reliable unless the reader can go beyond the frame of the picture. In this case, for some eerie reason, I cannot dial into it. I don’t know whether they have done something in the creation process (of the creature), but I cannot locate (pinpoint) its DNA beyond drawing superficial character swabs in situ.

When I evaluate physical traits (of the form), I find anomalies I don’t believe could be the inspiration of “Photoshop”. Some of the features would require such patience and tactile craftsmanship, without super-human skills and a massive commercial purse, no one would bother (assuming they had the technique, which would need to be better than any Photoshop evidence I have ever reviewed in my life). Pushing aside the characteristic ears and large horns which are not glued on and the very strange inhumane facial features, the feet and the hands (in particular) are the giveaways as to the validity of this evidence. Remember, I have other skills too. Years ago, I acted as philatelic expert and valuer for a number of prestigious auction houses. If vermillionI was given the unfavourable task of discerning which of the French 1849 Ceres 1 franc vermilions were originals or Jean de Sperati forgeries. The only way to do that was applying absolute attention to detail. I look at the photograph that apparently features the Pope Lick Monster and I find evidence to be congruous. The hands, on first glance, appear to support long talons or claws. This may improve the monster identity, but on closer inspection, the talons are in fact fingers – extremely long, thin fingers (and thumb that sticks out) that are like nothing I have ever seen before. 0aa4fb3a2165c0b10222f822f1de20e1One hand is rather blotted out by light, but, gauging perspective, it is the same as its partner. My eyes do not deceive me. Before me is an extraordinary Photoshop product, far better than anything Jean de Sperati (the forger that fooled the experts) could produce. Too good, it surely must be real.

camel+foot.jpgThen there are those very odd feet: two clear, but probably three “camel” toes which are not hooved. If some imaginative person with skills wanted to create a Satyr, they would surely give it horns and hooves, no? The type of foot is not only nothing like anything comparable (other than the Camel’s) but also clearly belongs. There is no familiar cut & paste smudge. In addition, the monster’s physique is not impossibly human, but very streamline, very authentically muscular. This print must be real and if anyone came forward (including the person that released the picture) and claimed it was a fake, I could only be compelled to bellow, “Liar, create another just like it while I watch you.” Whether its origins are from Pope Lick Creek remains unconfirmed.

satyr_by_artbytravisMaking the well calculated assumption the photograph is genuine, what is the creature? It seems to be a liberal example of Satyr. The legs aren’t very hairy. Neither is much apparent around the body, but as a best case, the Satyr is the closest answer to something known (albeit mythical). According to Wikipedia (a tainted but occasionally useful information resource), there are two spurious references in the verses of biblical book of Isaiah (which, though is hard to date, likely precedes the Greek classical period). In Leviticus (17:7) the practice of sacrificing se’irim (Heb he-goats with the colloquial additional meaning – devil) maybe a derivative of the Arabian legend azabb al-‘akaba (shaggy demon of the mountain pass). Also the lexicographer, Robert Beekes, suggests Greek Saturos may have (I presume) Aryan-Slavic origins, although their “wood nymphs” are called leshii. No SatyrRather than being demonstrably violent, myths have portrayed these creatures as being lewd and decadent, virile and overtly sexually promiscuous. If they were to be labelled devils, it would be as impish fornicating womanisers and not as psychotic fiends.

Conspicuously, the creature depicted crouches over its fallen prey (presumably a man of unknown origin). It scowls at and attempts to strike the photographer. Consequentially, the beast is naked, but not lewd. There is no figurative sexual interplay; no residual energy. This is anger and hate and desire combined; virility yes, but not even a glimmer of illicit passion. This is not the Satyr of ancient Russian and Greek mythology. This is something very different. So what is it? If I carefully review the photographic evidence again, I note that the eyes are closed; perhaps blinded by the flashlight. It is a shame because the expression “the eyes are the windows to the soul” is not an aimless one. The best way, for an energy reader, to securely pinpoint origins is via those portals to holistic DNA. I, we, have been closed off, shut out by the miracle of technology that allowed us to glimpse at this creature of dubious status. Yet, other than the rather oddly accentuated neck region (partially obscured by flashlight), the torso looks remarkably human – a young man with exceptional physique after a workout, I would say. The leg calves are well formed (look at the lightened one carefully), thighs compact. Taking away the bizarre accoutrements, it could be human. But those accoutrements also make it clearly not human. It is a human hybrid.

QaGVU16Who or what made it? Is it one of those noxious black military secrets? Why under the US Norfolk Southern Railway trestle above Pope Lick Creek (assuming that is the location)? Rumours had been circulating since the 1930’s or perhaps prior. The mystery was such to inspire a cheesy 70’s movie. I haven’t seen the film so it may also be serious, exquisitely revealing, but it didn’t ever make my TV screen in my formative years, so I can only assume it didn’t make the grade. It wasn’t very good. But if someone tells me otherwise, I’ll go seek it out. 95791-004-9B0456EBThe point is that knowledge of this (or these) creature stretches back for the best part of a hundred years or, perhaps, beyond. That’s a long time to keep the lid on a black military op. No, definitely, that’s not it. This is something else. I think this is evidence of supposed extra-terrestrial genetic experiments that are actually very much terrestrial (of this Earth). They (the aliens), their power structures, are so much more advanced of us that they can, more or less, operate hidden in plain sight. There is only one group with the skills to produce something like this that might qualify. In my opinion, this is the product of Hu Gadam on the Earth plane. This is an attempt to turn man into something more.

god-fearing-womenDo I see our hybrid as evidence of Hu Gadam at work? Not on your life. We know the Satyr is mostly a happy-go-lucky, boozy pervert that casts illicit spells over God fearing women and girls transforming them into fertile nymphs. Sacrilege (according to the Puritans)! Foto15Hu Gadam would never create a violent, sadistic axe murdering siren. Let’s check out that photo again for more clues. Ah ha, I think you all spot it but do you see? Look really carefully. Look at those strange paws. I symbolically chose the “camel’s toe”; but that ain’t no camel! Anyone checked out the “chook’s feet” of a Ciakar reptilian recently? Look no further. It’s right before your eyes! That is precisely what you should see if you were witnessing Draco Ciakar feet. They love to disguise hallmarks in plain sight that the suckers (human cattle) won’t notice (see), but, albeit with a little help from me, you’ve all noticed. precious-bloodsh1cWe [now] know this is the Ciakar [long standing] ruse as an attempt to make Hu Gadam look bad, appear monstrous in order to deny humans evidence of our Pteroid roots.

Remember the humble beginnings of this treatise when I offered some truth about Lucifer. Did any of you think it odd that he was a light bearer, given the tradition that the biblical Elohim are light beings and the importance of light “conquering darkness” in the selected opening verses of John’s gospel (the one plausibly written by “Jesus” himself)? Might the adroit ignorance amongst “Christians” generally as to the humble etymology of “Lucifer” have some bearing (excuse the pun) on this? Could dark forces (perhaps aligned to Draco Ciakar factions) have pulled a switcheroo to confuse brethren in the Middle Ages or perhaps just after the breakup of the Roman Empire? Once Latin went out of fashion it would only be a matter of time before light could be dark and dark light. In fact there is only one biblical reference that counts, because any other would have simply relied on it for guidance and this proposes an alternative explanation. Isaiah 14:12 reads per my translation:

“How have you fallen from the heavens, Lucifer (note: perhaps the Morning Star); the consequence of your fall has subjugated nations”

satanThe superstitions over Lucifer came about as part of a progressive strategic enterprise designed to cultivate the “right to control”. According to the naïve view, if humanity was only answerable to God, would an angelic heavenly agent dare to subjugate us, innocently or not, he/she/it must be a blasphemer. Because this message is irrelevant and incorrect (permanently lionizing our [fake] sun as “God”), it has permitted eternal debate for corrupt enterprises. It pre-supposes that we are biological robots, incapable of deliberate choice; otherwise Lucifer (as described) would only be able to subjugate those of us with character flaws. At least one interpretation of the implied accrued consequences casts Jesus as Satan. In fact, common sense dictates those that inspired the metaphorical Tower of Babel account worshiped the Morning or the Day Star (depending on which version you prefer) and Lucifer (as its standard) inspired anti-pharisaic licentious behaviour. pharisees1“Your pomp and music of your harps” seems very much in the spirit of Hu Gadam and pantheism, so I can only draw the conclusion that Isaiah, the stiff shirt, was twisted and tortured by the mirth and merriment of others. He was definitely no Robin Hood.

Certainly from the very many and varied references I have collected, this (Isaiah’s attitude) is a noteworthy Ciakar trait. They love to ruin the fun of others, providing it doesn’t affect their own unseemly ambitions. This style of aggravated tyranny is consistent with the Puritan brand of Christianity. For clarity, Puritan synonyms include Pharisee or prig. Those still not clear as to relevance deserve a lexicon reference. Prig means “a self-righteously moralistic person who behaves as if they are superior to others” or “hypocrite”. In addition, the use of the concept of the falling star as a racial divide against the rising run (covert paganism) is a direct attack on pantheism which takes the view that error (fall) is far more important than success (rise). To become the brightest of all stars you must first have travelled the rite of passage. The Phoenix bird always renews more illuminated and stronger from the ashes.

Elsewhere in the Bible we find greater attention to truth and less to hypocritical whim. The ultimate clue is given in Genesis’ Adam and Eve. Genesis 2:19

“Now the Lord God (Hu Gadam) had formed out of the ground (genetic culture) all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man (Homo erectus or Neanderthal) to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature; that was its name.”

godThis is a very enigmatic passage which is made more so by the token that no one understands what it means. It is referring to a genetic catalogue that is crowned by man. The catalogue is so vast and complete it was used to create every single bird and animal on the planet surface and that is why man only had the right to name all his creatures, for they were his DNA. That is also the Hu Gadam connection to pantheism. Nature, in its entirety, not merely the creatures, was created from a solitary gene pool. Everything on the material plane, apart from the outsiders (the aliens), belongs as everything is related through genetic ancestry.  Therefore the celebration of that which is natural and vital is not an option for the truly zealous; it is life itself. That is Hu Gadam’s pantheism.

Advertisements

4 responses »

  1. It’s funny how out of the pictures my favorite is the One of Jesus. I’m not a Christian but Man oh man that picture speaks volumes.

    Like

    • That is a gold star comment for so many reasons.

      It shows how human beings judge the book “by the cover”. The picture of “Jesus”, of course, if a fraud, a fake, a fantasy. “If” Jesus existed he certainly did not look like that (he is described as “short in stature” by one of the scrolls, implying he had a “hunch”).

      What is a “Christian”? Someone who “believeS” or someone that “behaves”?

      I have a bizarre dream at age 5. I was located in what appeared to be catacoombs and in the distace was a magnificent figure clad in shining white. I knew it was Jesus. How I perambulated is unclear, but it felt as though I was a cameraman edging ever closer to the subject in a movie. As the camera rolled, my Jesus began to tarnish. Eventually I saw detail of the face, which was a cracked olive putrid cover, wriggling with maggots.

      Make of that what you will, but I know how “I” interpret it!

      Like

  2. Pingback: The Mystery of Hu Gadam and Pantheism | I am Exopolitician, iXossana reincarnated

  3. Pingback: Live DNA Light Readings – Deep Historic “Extra-Terrestrial” Field | I am Exopolitician, iXossana reincarnated

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s