Every now and again proclaimed clairvoyants boast of having met with famous historic personages. Whether characters are real or their fantasies, business is mostly the same. From the cosmic perspective (which is immeasurably displaced from human vanity), to be famous is not to be important. So why do the charlatans keep massaging their egos?
Personally knowing luminaries and the behind-the-scenes characters that cultivate prestige, I have come to realise the timeless relevance of fame is overblown and would be best attributed as a feature of human desperation to affirm predispositions validating the perception of importance. By this determination, action is far less worthy than accolade, or, to be seen to be doing invariably trumps the actual “doing”. There is a general superstition that assures connection infects. Logically, apropos, the more stars, luminaries and famous people in “frame” would immeasurably improve the reputation of any low light seeking “prosthetic” fame. Thus, per that reasoning, to be singled out and called on only by famous people empowers credibility creating a sort of sacred status for those in the spotlight. Why did all those famous people exclusively visit little me?
Like the three wise monkeys, the real stars invariably come and go unannounced, unseen and unheard. Demonstrative talent that is out of tune with a given age may collect dust covering hidden treasure for discovery at a distant, future period. But, even then, due to the hereditary parasitic narcissism of man, legacies are certain to be tarnished in some way. There is always some hangover as a response to the incongruous hatred of past conceited critics. Humans are at war with each other, constantly. The great group, surreptitiously organised by “the elites”, is attempting to create “one view” (which is labelled “Globalism”).
Per that vision, everyone is either “in tune” or “out of tune”. For Globalism to succeed, it needs in tune citizens. If the vision stands a chance at working, out of tune anarchists must be expunged (which can only mean eradication). In this case, citizens are law abiding, whereas anarchists are anti-establishment. Measures are dictated and usually facilitated though populist conventions. Other than the New Age smokescreen constructed by the United Nations, harmony is not a consideration. Therefore, Globalism must be and is symptomatic of reptilian authority. As there are no noticeable reptilians in plain sight, this covert operation can only be administered by hidden overlords.
Nevertheless, this particular blog entry is not going to be about fraudulent psychics or those ever present Draco reptilian cloaking tricks, though I may offer a few tips as I go. Here, the focus and inspiration has been music, the senses and how much we take for granted. For instance, as a concert trained classical pianist (my channel will be updated at some point), why wouldn’t I occasionally daydream what it would be like to meet with and hear the great Franz Liszt, Frederick Chopin or Ludwig Beethoven play their instruments and vocalise their unique crafts? Given the comparatively tiny populations of the time, why did the nineteenth century produce so many memorable artists, whose exhaustive compositions output is the legacy?
I happened to mention famous composers, which is not evidence of my own parasitic narcissism. There were a great number of lesser known romantic period composers that have left small, individual legacies. Yet, as much as I evaluate the alternatives, I keep coming back to the big three; Liszt, Chopin and Beethoven as the creators of particular genres which go beyond music. Undisputedly, the Spanish composers’ Albeniz, Granados, Russia’s Balakirev all had their own sounds, but for the German style there is either Liszt or Beethoven. Spanish, Russian, American, Italian mid-romantics still reproduced either Chopin or Liszt genres.
Some might argue that Schumann, whose lyricism is similar to Mendelssohn’s, is different. But I disagree. Even Liszt struggled to break free from the influence of Beethoven. Schubert and Brahms never did. Much lesser known composers of the ilk of Thalburg, Kalkbrenner, Fernz and Weber only ever produced Liszt, Chopin or Beethoven genre music. Educated readers will notice a paradox. Friedrich Kalkbrenner applied to tutor the child Chopin, who was certainly also influenced by John Field (attributed as inventing the nocturne before Chopin was born) and Johann Hummel. Weber and Kalkbrenner produced musical fusions of Chopin and Beethoven. Beethoven clearly referenced Muzio Clementi idioms, but the big three created the genres.
Without appreciation, music would have no value. Appreciative judgement would not be possible without senses. Because they cannot escape them, credentialed scientists have acknowledged sight, touch, hearing, smell and taste. Many others have gone unnoticed. Of course, clairvoyance is often jokingly labelled the sixth sense. If scientists took the joke seriously, they would be able to distinguish between clairvoyance, clairaudience and clairsentience. Other more rational senses impinge on Globalism’s grand vision for mankind. Discernment has no role in a world populated by biological automatons. That makes it a pretty interesting sense, because it demonstrates some have it and others simply, well, don’t. This, in turn, does not make good for uniform society. Could talent, God forbid, be the product of discernment?
In my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” I go into detail. What is the difference between a sense and an experience? Are all experiences sensed? Before serious scientists consider these, existential building blocks, such as dimensions, densities and frequencies must be reviewed and understood, in depth. There are many conflicts of information when delving into realms that cannot be experienced directly. For instance, via extra-terrestrial channelled sources, some say there are but ten dimensions, others reveal figures in the hundreds and still more place no limit on possibility for dimensional states.
Right off, I dissolve the mathematical argument that holds theoretical straight lines, areas and objects are not aspects of the same perceptive illusion. “Object reality” is precisely that and all dimensions (from the mathematical perspective) are only associated with 3D. Variations come in other ways, such as colour, intensity, temperature, sound and so on. Wave forms, in raw state, do qualify as a separate dimension, but this [in many ways] is more flexible and complete than our own 3D. Should it be called 4D? Correlating with physics opinion, there is only 1D or 3D. “Flat realities” simply do not exist, except as features contained within the 3D environment.
Returning to the question, “what is harmony?” We know harmonics relate to pitch and harmonies are musical cadences. Harmony, therefore, is a sound vibration. This is important as there is an entire dimension created from what we call “audio waves” only. Included in this altered state are light variations at different frequency (pitch) levels if the comparison was to be made with Earth plane existence. In an earlier entry, I reflect on the ancient practice of communion. Back in Atlantean (from Atlantis) times, large groups of people synchronised music to channel massive energy resources from the centre of our planet. Why doesn’t much more than a trickle of the vast suppositories of molten lava supposedly contained in Earth’s core that geo-physicists babble about interrupt the calm lives of surface dwellers? The “Greek” Acropolis and other ancient sites are much, much older than people would imagine. Little be known, but these are the legacies of man’s negotiated connection with God.
Frequencies are very important. For instance, the Vedas claim [3D] creation is 0-20 hertz. Others associate certain pitches with magical healing properties. Ironically, I met with the aspiring energy healer, Leah Briers, this week and we fortuitously had a heated debate over senses, particularly in relation to vanity. Passion is an important part of negotiation. Flimsy, well-meaning positive affirmations invariably obscure truth in deference to goodwill. We pondered the question; do those that instinctively tune into fashions have a special sense? Vanity in the way of narcissism featured as my reasoned response. “Vain”, in that context, of course, is a dirty word and this is where discussions with Leah broke down.
I, correctly, emphasised that the appreciation of beauty was vanity and, as such, demonstrated narcissism in mankind. Yet she, though the word was not referenced, stressed the determination that aesthetics go way beyond the surface. As a complete expression, her point of view revered the intrinsic connections between the appreciated vision and all-inclusiveness. This could be anything but vain. Beauty is referenced “in position” against that which is not noticeably beautiful. It turned out that we were effectively debating the difference between ignorance and sensitivity. We, at last, agreed that ignorant beauty is everything shallow (perhaps dysfunctional given the lack of esteemed congruity) and intelligent aesthetics consumes functional depth (essence). She talked of her mission to integrate shadow (dark) and light. Undoubtedly, disciplined attention to her interpretation of aesthetics could achieve that.
Expressions of appreciation can turn into conflicts. Taste in music is an excellent example. If I was to occupy a room that had one of the great Beethoven Symphonies as background music and was joined by another person, we might react in very different ways to the listening experience. Assuming the symphony was well rehearsed and exquisitely performed, for me the listening pleasure would certainly be bliss whilst the other might endure “hell on toast”. Taste is not just simply divided by, shall we say, ignorance and intuition. Intuitive people are selective and I, personally, find much modern music (particularly the varieties that favour discords that don’t resolve) abhorrent. Others love it. Culture wars are most commonly fought over pictorial art. Numerous well versed spectral opinions are the legacy of sane judgement. People are different.
Communication boundaries make effective consideration of animals’ views impossible. There is no way I could relate to a dolphin, a pigeon or even a lowly chimpanzee (which, science tells me is almost a genetic cousin of man). Nevertheless, that does not alter the fact that I could sit in the presence of a wolfhound, for example, and hear nothing while it was tantalised by a special rhythmic gigue created outside my audible range. Perhaps I could train the dog to alert me when it expressed enjoyment, but, even then, how could I be absolutely sure my training methods weren’t flawed in some way or the dog wasn’t a versed liar (for rehearsed deceit, listen to just about any of our politicians)?
The other issue is, because I, personally, don’t hear it, does that mean there is no sound even though the dog acts as witness? This is something that goes beyond discernment, but it is a good example as it demonstrates the non-uniformity of nature. Lack of uniformity means I do not necessarily have to correlate with other human beings either. I can experience things no one else can, because I’m natural. Through fault of Globalist establishments rejecting pantheism as a consequence of the collapse of the Roman Empire (which was integrated into what has become the Vatican powerbase), United Nation’s hybrid New Age Catholicism is little more than a commerce planner for “Big Pharma” and other superficial population control mechanisms.
Are countries anything more than migrant brands? Constant displacement and reassignment may eventually create one race (a cacophony of hybrid genetics). The people are not adapting to the plan in the way the elitists want. Jewish microcosms within societies have largely set the standard. The repatriation regime has predominantly had the effect of splintering existing communities to such a degree there is no common voice, only multi-cultural mobs in constant conflict. The Jews, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists and so on want their specific brands of order otherwise never the twain shall meet, so mafia communities occasionally erupt either against “Order” or social competitors. Perhaps the most noteworthy example is how the Muslims have reacted to perceived threats after the [so-called] 911 event in America; hardly harmony?
Is not the burqa the most vehemently grotesque artefact of tyranny? God is found in nature, so if Mohammed’s modest dress command was to be obeyed, where practical, the absolute is an absence of clothing and not an aesthetic device purely designed to scandalise lust. It God was anti-fornication we would have been genetically modified long ago. The burqa is nothing more than a veil of censorship. It is no accident that Pharisaic fundamentalism adopts a similar practice. The self-proclaimed “apostle” Paul applies dogma with clarity. “For if a woman does not cover her head, it may as well be shaved free of hair. To avoid disgrace, she will comply” (my adapted translation of Corinthians 11:6). The Judaic orthodox counterparts aligned with the Pharisees offer large wigs in place of scarves as their means of censorship.
In fact, there is a great hint that God is not anti-lust as expressed in the biblical Old Testament book of Genesis. “Adam and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame” (2:25). Though the Adam & Eve passage is confusing as “Eve” is presumed to be “Adam’s wife” (which is not so), it categorically states that appropriate lust and nakedness is God’s will. Sentiment is reinforced per the “fall from grace” where God voices his displeasure at “man and woman” (not Adam and Eve) becoming ashamed by their nakedness. The tree of knowledge is blamed, as a routine gesture of pharisaic infiltration, but this actually symbolises something out of context. Eve, essence of humanity (as opposed to Adam, essence of ape man) possessed alien genetics not disposed to natural Earth. Human cannot survive on Earth naked, whereas Neanderthal (man) can. Humans are sensitive and man is not. Readers that have been attentive will discover outstanding though unsettling ramifications from this information.
The elite planners that created this modern mess have demonstrated an absence of sensitivity too. This leads me to question whether it is a sense. For instance, if we argue sensitivity is susceptibility, then adroit scepticism is the diametric. Scepticism, atheism, materialism and capitalism have collectivised to become evil partners as all elitist driven policies accentuate aspects of them. Though no effort is spared in ridiculing transgressors, the New World Order is shown up over and over as a failure as a social model. It is shown up because it simply has not worked. Elite egos have been bruised as a consequence. So much so supremacists might favour the eradication of the human beast as an improvement on the current course. Will this encourage Armageddon?
Even the most insincere observer can surely rationalise the paradox: elite humans’ hell bent on destroying humanity, including themselves? It is not at all representative of higher powers either, if factions of the Draco are seriously considered as overlords. Pteroids simply would not bother with the subterfuge. It’s not their style. Ciakars do not only build empires, but have a long history of overt and covert control on (and in) Earth. The closest approximation of their character set can be found in the behaviour of cats. That is why their nocturnal version of Earth plane “humans” (these live in subterranean caverns) sound like felines. The Polished Knob video channel on YouTube offers a catalogue of numerous genuine original sightings. Language is strong in the selected clip but I do not hear the trademark Grey’s “call”. Other clips do present visual and audial evidence.
When the reptilians infiltrated and controlled Babylon, what did the people worship? Cats, of course!!! Earth kings of beasts on land are all varieties of cats, with two possible exceptions. Bears are low vibrational genetic cousins of Neanderthals (Pteroid “man”). Others from the Pteroid branch include the jackal-like White Draco and elephant nosed, floppy eared scouts. From the same gene-set, terrifying dogs represent their other supreme predators. Indeed ancient folklore promotes mythical dog headed humans (Cynocephali) which have either not been discovered or suppressed by modern science. Even in recent times, there have been claims of sightings of werewolves. Though no photographs exist for my research and most videos are easily rationally explained as incorrectly describing known phenomena, the stills from this (2015?) Brazilian CCTV footage are most intriguing
Yes, a little ritualistic Ciakar terror (they call fun), I can accept. Paedophile networks and masonic snuff rings may be so, but incidence would be too rare to interrupt our wider populations’ state of mediocrity. Assumed logic might dismiss these infeasible accounts, but that has not hindered zealous accusations to accrue and stockpile, creating clandestine pseudo-chronicles over time. Targeting easily excited feeble minds, many tales also find sanctity in the horror folklore genre designate. The serious side is very bitter with constant politically motivated attacks against Catholics and other strategic figures as routine propaganda. Unsurprisingly, no hard evidence has ever publically surfaced to validate any of these alleged scandalous malfeasant practices. It should be noted that hearsay has been a very effective tool in its use against political enemies. People have gone missing and others have made claims. Those claims alone have often acted as judge, juror and executioner with nothing to back them. It is almost as though the medieval inquisition is alive and well again.
Medieval chastity, chivalry, symbolism and even poetic philosophy are systematic of reptilian intervention on Earth. One of their own most potent emblems depicts the fleur de lys (usually in royal blue or scarlet) which means eternal life. Inquisitions are very much their style too. I have made some progress with Eva Draconis’ “The Orion Project – Real or Imaginary?” From her copious notes, it becomes apparent that reptilians (although most of the characters introduced deny being reptilian) have paradoxically split personalities. Call it instinct dictates they want to torture and kill any worthy chattel. Conscientious humility assures they must have permission from each victim. Not only that, but our fearsome tormenters regularly succumb to pity, particularly if victims are too willing and eager to be the sacrafice. If that isn’t sweet, I don’t know what is! Theirs is a society, it seems, literally divided between dominant masters and willing slaves. However, the differences compared to human order are considerable. Our slaves are not willing and never will be and that is why harmony is such an alien concept for human beings.