Pieces of the Network that Controls Humanity Exposed

Appropriately, after last article’s divulged truths (albeit concerning substantively “unknown” information), perspectives demonstrated most of human history has been spiritually chaperoned by forces traditionally considered not of this Earth. Forgiving my occasional unrefined phraseology, commitment has been made to exposing how unseen control over our affairs has become so entwined with majority worldview, nuances (strange or otherwise) are casually brushed aside as the way things will be. Akhenaten’s reputed fear of things that go bump in the night is quite well-reasoned, was the veil covering human apathy to be fully ripped off. Of course that would never happen, but elements wantonly distorting reality worldview are equally versed at hiding in daylight too, so real disclosure would amount to futility anyway. Suffice to say, we are staring at something obscured from view that is as structured and multi-faceted as any control network, but in this case physical isan extension of metaphysical. Consequentially, several (almost everyone) will have had their minds bent sufficiently to skew visibility, permanently. Proponents of “the way things are” have presumed everyone shares their “unquestionable” uniformity. Yet a little tepid rebellion persists in authority. Psychologists are one group in particular who are not convinced collective worldview is necessarily uniform, but tend to cordon off malfunctioning “state of mind” as something clandestine. To them reality is always separate, preserving robust predictability. The one thing we can count on from life.

In light of this, a rather more intriguing question beckons. Might it be possible to change how you experience reality simply by altering the manner by which you perceive it? Throughout history there are many examples of initiatives undertaken by those not ensnared by psychology falsehoods. One that sticks out most sorely is the 1998 Schole Experiment. A group of raconteurs did prove that it was possible to manipulate time-space continuum using harmonics, but as all five guinea pigs “disappeared” from reality, evidence is pretty hollow. According to at least one clairvoyant, sadly no party members survived their efforts, but at the very minimum, supreme sacrifice demonstrated effects from bending reality are permanent. Said state of mind can be more than perception. This is not to say we should lose sight of the other side of the coin. Most sensationally, hallucinogenic drugs from time to time have had the effect of sprouting “useless” wings, causing injury or death to recreational adventurers. 

Back to the mundane, reality “shaping” is certainly a large part product of crisscrossing, overlapping propagandas. These authority views have been fomented over eons, result of multitudes of agendas. (Dare I say) corporate Medias and other mainstream publications exploit the legacy to the hilt. It is more than feasible to argue vogue outpourings (routinely by proscribed misinformation “causes”, cough cough) inciting mass ignorance are selective capitulations squarely designed to pull the wool over the eyes. Lone vocal critiques may well call out screeched conspiracies, but the war against social revolutionaries began with so-called “civilization”. It’s just, no one noticed. The very earliest attack on political agitation began first with the invention of God or, more importantly, God’s official “spokespersons” and then a natural evolution to existential “blasphemy” ensued. Any plebian “misfit” (the Greeks called idiot) that dared contradict theological order beneath priest kings would have been swiftly put to death with great commotion. So though we may well rue the modern age’s ever waning “free speech”, actually things have improved immeasurably over the ages.

Some of those traditionally categorised “not of this Earth” were once natives and, as our direct creators, mingled freely with us. Biblical Genesis correctly (and stealthily, so as not to ruffle establishment feathers) identified them as spiritual overseers. Aside from “reptilians”, there was another party (represented by the apple) who eventually came to rescue us, leaving a complete copy of pristine divine record in tablet form along with the infamous Ark of the Covenant, which was “lost” after the destruction of the temple.  It is beyond clear (endorsed by that mysterious disappearance) the “rot” began with those self-appointed priest kings. Better understanding of the real agenda slipped out after Isaiah’s terse (and otherwise illogical) outburst rebuking the morning star (said to be Lucifer) for audacious competition with the sun at daybreak. After his confession, there is no doubt in my mind that the Hebrews were (and therefore still are, but for ignorance) accessories to the Amun-Ra cult. Given high percentages of ancient cultures have left legacy evidence supporting sun worship, I tender such exhibit as the primary piece of a posthumous puzzle exposing subjugated human spirituality. Islam likewise is so closely mapped to Judaism; it has served as a masterful decoy to deflect wider objectives of doctrine. Occasional pearls can be plucked from an otherwise fools’ treasure trove, but “competing” Gnostic Christianity diverges from corruption. Perhaps Gnosticism’s relative purity is because associated patrons had the foresight to bury Scripture deep (dug up thousands of years later). There can be no doubt the Romans (whose ancestors were biblical Philistines), most notably under Constantine, did everything in their power to nobble epistemic equations. Catholicism, a shadow of faith from conception, was briskly reduced to Paganism.

Connecting with not of this Earth, the astute amongst my readership will recall how those pesky reptilians have a sun worshiping doctrine themselves. Their much vaunted Tamaras (divinely transcendent mother Ra in blessed union with Anunaki) ideology directly competes with an atheist-friendly Tamarian (or scientifically dubbed quantum layer). To certain intents and purposes, it might be argued that said orthodox reptilian believers assume all living things (by our common definition) on Earth were “made” by the sun. Roman Philistine Sol Invictus (rebranded under Catholicism) is the closest human approximation to this, surely tempting a rather more thorough analysis of photons than is current. Is it possible that they permit life? That considered, why the Pope and the Vatican play such a pivotal role in directing universal morality should come as no surprise. In line, a new world order had been conceived to grow out of the (later disbanded) League of Nations in 1920. Thousands of years ago, central Italy was settled by Etruscans. Based on Babylonian tradition, a small land area became designated as refuge for the Goddess Vatika, who reputedly presided over a dark underworld that housed departed souls (shadows) of the dead. Before long, the deity became synonymous with drug induced prophecy, as ancient residents are reported to have sometimes drunk a bitter local wine that caused hallucinations. Deity namesake Vatican was constructed in 1929 to formulate corporate religion (devoted to decompose reality view?). League of Nations and Vatican effectively “merged” as the United Nations in 1945. Israel was deliberately re-founded in 1948 to administer global Law. That corresponding assault on political freedom was mocked by George Orwell’s “1984”. Thus, it should be deemed by no means “ironical” that Israel demonstrates impunity towards international law today. The “Law” is what Israel exclusively dictates, under new world order.

There are compelling indicators (which I reveal from time to time) showing new world order modelled from prior experiences under supreme universal reptilian control. The reptilians reached their point of exalted development from an evolution that attempted to observe the wishes of “the people” completely, as represented by law, which was arguably at loggerheads with Atlantis systems. Though reflective governance was authoritarian, most willingly coexisted within the framework proscribing greater good philosophy. And while not all subjects agreed with all laws, need for revolution had been effectively nulled, because laws were not designed to attack the people. Consequently, even today, their social structures and ideologies are somewhat different to human equivalency. Unlike ours, their society is so interlocked, to shun “group view” in any measure might predict reaction, the greater transgression, the greater the violence. What humans would passively judge as innocent disputes have been known to erupt into full blown wars of attrition. Entire families have been tragically divided between poles devoted to either side of a given argument. Even so, reptilian view on politics does bleed over into our domains. Perhaps certain mythical ideals casting proverbial black sheep as socially destructive are result of their ancient tradition. With this in mind, it would be prudent to come to terms with potential scope of reptilian involvement and influence over our entire folklore legacy. At a glance, just about all surviving religious doctrines record direct or implied obsidian involvement with human affairs. For instance, even the biblical creation story (as irrational as it might seem by those determined to uphold institutional “history”) places the serpent in a central political position in the creation of man.

None can compellingly deny the pivotal nature of the relationship the serpent has with Adam and Eve. If we were to analyze philosophy more deeply, though texts clearly present serpent as manipulative, how much is judgement reflective of a whimsical “God”; one that espouses classical reptilian reasoning “you do as I say” or else. We should not lose sight of the fact, the closest ancient Hebrews came to omnipresence was acknowledgement of Ba’al, a concept which (according to some of the earliest surviving historic notations) was resolutely outlawed. Ba’al (as described) obscures thinly disguised homophone Ba’bel (pronounced bar bell) . Of course, the reason that Ba’al (worship of outer God) had been scandalised by Judeans is they saw first-hand how destructive idol power could be (Voodoo is a severely watered down version). Premise fundamentally determines why experiments to recreate Ba’bel would spectacularly fail. Yet most (if not all) so-called scholars are acutely unaware of such truth or the enduring consequences of worship. Instead, they pretend to persuade serious study enthusiasts that arbitrary authoritarianism is justified, when arbitrary authoritarianism can never be justified under prime law. This is because, from pertinent moral perspective, arbitrary authoritarianism is oppression.

Whereas I don’t plan to become bogged down with analysis of ancient texts, it is useful to determine what was known and what may have been deliberately distorted by cult interests or proponents of censorship. For example, was the golden calf [lost] legacy of Atlantis? What became of the relic or relics? These are serious questions, though hard to answer credibly. How would a supposedly “primitive” people dispose of a “priceless” two to three meters high solid block of gold? Was the effigy composed of mythical monatomic gold? And the key question. Does the nature of metal influence a ratio to accessible spiritual power? Such ratios would explain proven “magical” properties of Atlantean or Lumerian rings. Australian researcher Steven Strong’s legitimate, whilst bizarre accounts of dangers (eerily duplicating properties announced in Tolkien’s “Lord of the Rings”) of certain rings led to his resolute willful destruction of a valuable artifact. If one miniscule device could command so much power, what could metric tons of gold achieve as instrument of wrath of God? Such [hidden] knowledge would explain near fanatical interest in alchemy, origins which can be traced back to Babylonian times. But did the ancients have access to special technologies; and ones sufficient to either destroy or obscure a monstrous effigy of a golden calf? Perhaps the relic does still exist. One instinctively must wonder whether occultist Clintons have prospered any expedition to find their real Moloch?

Without doubt, motive for the recreation of idols was anything but intrinsic. Idols are deeply misunderstood by modern peoples, but serious business nonetheless. Any valid mistrust of ancient records must begin with glaring lack of reasoning used to justify original outlaw of worship. Maybe “everyone” knew the reasons at the time, so accountability was overlooked, but the idea of early censorship here seems very compelling to me. After all, most history is at the very least backed up with some philosophy (albeit commonly “divisive”). Noteworthy absence of reasoning supporting the banning of idols irritates the mind. Impartial observers are to presume they were just “bad” and that’s that. For me, complete lack of accountability suggests the truth was censored very early on. In other words, idols were banned by agents of social control (which Krishna determined were the root of evil) who deliberately committed to erasing memory. In this case, it was the memory of idolatry. Absence of truth can encourage hypothetical reenactment to relearn what was lost. Does that apply to Ba’bel? In line, vehicles that might provide divine power to the people could surely transform proverbial “masses” into an arbitrary force to be reckoned with. Was the force more than to be reckoned with? After review of certain associated specular legends, it seems quite plausible that, once awakened (Genie in the bottle), awe of the Gods could not be controlled, even by those that commissioned it. Such consideration would paint idols as something unpredictably dangerous.

They could conceivably become supra life forces of their own. And consequentially we stumble upon the true nature of the Gods, which is hinted at in Zoroastrian liturgy. According to this tradition, power of influence on high does dramatically alter the character of society below. Perhaps Sophia’s Satan star was the proverb for dimensional existence. Perhaps everything, including the Gods, endure life cycles. Anunaki ascension (spectacular reality shift) around 37,000 years ago is but one example of seasonal change. That particular event caused a relative void ensuring Earth atmosphere was no longer contaminated from Zoroaster’s philosophic viewpoint. Other perspectives see Anunaki instrumentally shifting to (occupation of) the sun, which has perhaps made opportunity for interference far worse. If the Babylonians and then the Romans were correct in their assumptions, we cannot exist without exposure to the sun. Not merely because sun is vocational life giver, but our DNA requires an accelerator (that endorses reptilian photon theory?), compounding ability to “live”. Delving more deeply into my earlier considerations over ancients attempt to play with divine fire by igniting Ba’al, truth is plain to see. Ancients had made committed effort to restoring celestial order; the kingdom of heaven on Earth that had been made possible with Atlantis. Although, it is likely Earth was restocked after the flood, distinct memory of Atlantis refused to wither or illicit knowledge of Ba’bel (which became “Israel”).  

While modern day Hebrews appear oblivious to Atlantis secrets, there is no doubt in my mind that Ba’bel is the physical version of “Israel”. That is why glibly expressed “Promised Land” is such a pivotal Zionist obsession. Tragically, today’s Israelite hoards have succumbed to a barbarism, an inverse Atlantis agenda passed off as legitimate and one that mocks potency of king David’s authority. In light of this truth, burning pertinent key question has to be, when did the modern agenda (pertaining to perversion of Atlantis) begin? If the quest for destructive control commenced pre-biblical times, that would explain contradictions devaluing survived ancient information sources. Regardless of blind enthusiasm of fundamentalists, one is forced to draw the inevitable conclusion that records are combinations of good and bad intent, truth and deliberate distortion. As Hitler was quick to advise in his “mein kampf” memoir (advice followed religiously by Goering and Goebbels, though trend ironically repelled inciting contemporary Jewish Medias), well-orchestrated lies will ultimately deceive the masses. By classic example, a nonexistent “pandemic” was recently promoted with such zeal that the complete reverse of truth had the effect of “convincing” medical authority more or less in its entirety. Even today, some “professionals” are so convinced by that propaganda they refuse to concede cherished opinions. So too do religious fanatics and others that follow sometimes well meaning, but ignorant scholarly musings as though they were gospel. Richard Dawkins was inconveniently correct in his astonishing admissions over “failings of science due process”. It is so sad his personal corruption has reached such lofty excess; he has shown himself unable to heed his own vital wisdom. Let me reiterate. Compared against unfettered, detailed truth, corporate sciences are like bumbling blind men tapping sticks in the dark, without any real sense of direction. An example of this paradox I commonly choose to illustrate is gravity. Said invisible forces are the precise opposite of what is generally believed to be true.

Myself never coming close to conventional scholarly passion and with a nominally Christian upbringing, ancient texts most instinctively familiar are those contained within the old testament bible. Though, seemingly, every “fundamentalist” nutcase flocks to Deuteronomy or Leviticus as part of their torturous routine, JINO (Jews in name only) Zionists (disciples of prison planet) have predictably latched onto Amalek; a grubby passage vilifying wholesale slaughter under auspices of divine wrath. Punchline predictably clarifies all the nonsense was to save the Jews. As texts themselves shed the dimmest light on circumstances leading to an attributed holy purge, I respectfully fear “standard” interpretations may have come amiss. For instance, perhaps the plight of ancient Jews adequately compares with today’s reprehensible slaughter of Gazan innocents wanting only to live in peace beneath a respectful system of order. Deuteronomy is not entirely clear whether the Amalek lesson is “only for” Jews or whether circumstances “happened to benefit” Jews of that time. Was the passage to be regarded as immortalizing Jewish right as “chosen people” (in the same manner Joshua’s turgid drivel implausibly justified promised land clearing), then that would unquestionably defy the Torah. Suffice to say, there are problems if vogue JINO interpretation remains intact, because Gaza is the worm being preyed upon by a reckless beast. No amount of Talmudic wrangling can deny the fact that any worm blessed with access to might of God [per Amalek precedent] has more than mere right, but conclusive ordinance to administer “cleansing” pious wrath. In Gaza’s case justification for divine revenge is widened, for “yoke” suppling Israel’s Satanic hatred has been built and fulfilled by goyim, who must also be made to bear collective responsibility. In this instance, it seems most likely divine agency (per apt Amalek philosophy) will be represented by those typically branded “axis of evil” (inversion) by Satanic forces. Would it not be delightful to learn that Iran had been commissioned by God to smote the sacrilegious Jews for desecrating the Torah all along. JINO’s naturally care nothing for the Torah (when law fails to ratify ambition), but faithful traditionalists have been caught in a very bad place.

Reptilian perspective considered, provision of vestige (announcing acts of natural divinity) is justifiable. Limitless slaughter of “enemies” is also justifiable. It is not a giant step to conclude barbarous passages of the style of Amalek are misquoted from their playbook. For instance, they certainly in no way regard [insubordinate] human life as sacred. They have valid arguments that cast humans as “primitive” savages, sentiment not falling short of more obnoxious JINO Zionist obsession. Did the Jews feel they were “chosen” because they were able to break free of shackles of captivity, deserting faithful Phoenician brotherhood? Understandably, reptilian viewpoint is partly explained by their lack of conscience. Conscience assures we (as genetically related identities), from the moralist juxtaposition, will always be out of step with them. Such consideration would also go a long way to explaining those gaping Scriptural contradictions. Even so, it is noted there is some commonality in the manner we conduct cycles of revenge. Passion is a mutual field that allows cycles to precipitate. That is not the only comparison. Illustrating ancient texts, such as the rhetorical wisdom of Solomon, are overloaded with emotional judgement, which could be construed as direct evidence of reptilian influence or intervention. I believe that such influence had interfered with ancestral judgement, making them akin to puppets, because proxy is the next best thing to direct control. Subsequently, aligned corruption has run like a seam through significant textual output advising on moral and cultural human trajectory. That trajectory establishes the current power base. Last essay, I did reveal candid details on the Canaanites split after vacuum from (reptilian authority) absence. Faithful Phoenicians remained vigilant as Judean Israelite deserters fled to hide in the desert, bent on avoiding recapture by feared Sephardim (overlord ruling classes). Yet, it seems to me, deserters retained all the trappings of prior oppression only to eventually illicit “chosen” status. Accordingly, Atlantis enlightened society model (symbolized by Star of David) was demonstrably rejected out of hand, Ark of the Covenant conveniently disposed of lest the truth ever surface, and human power brokers have attempted to reinstate themselves as tyrannical new Sephardim.

Zionism sympathetic “historians” never seem to offer explanation as to why there is no obsession (or even the will) with return to Judea. Israel, therefore, has to be more than some otherwise incidental “land of promise”. After those disastrous early attempts to recreate Babel, prescient order was forced to settle for a technology generated oasis. Architectural powers were to use distractions (most recently under guise of “atheism” in all but name) to avoid need for compliance with human conscience. Ones with access to truth know Atlantis “prime law” is the only valid control system adequately accounting for conscience. Prime law, to remind the forgetful, has a sole command, which is all consuming. Harmonious perfection of “thou shalt not oppress” is applicable to all disputes. For worlds burdened by “only consider diplomacy when destruction fails” politics, eulogizing over oppression might sound like futile indulgence. Review though is necessarily important, revealing keys behind accrued divides that have had the effect of splintering humanity. Human is largely a spiritual being. Failure of popular religions to address much cognizant spirituality has had the effect of delivering repressed brethren. Religions, individually or collectively, have becomes radicalized into concentrations of dogmatic repression, causing instability that destroys the path to absolution. Prime law is contrived to cater for all life systems. Lions do not usually oppress and would only betray code of conduct when failing to consume kills, unless these are provided for family. Any human soldier that kills a branded enemy to dishonor warrior pledge of allegiance murders. Warrior pledges assume the right of willing participants to take challenge to the death. Day to day life acts of oppression are everywhere, from playing music too loudly to jumping supermarket queues. Every plausible human conflict can be adequately addressed by prime law, providing logic is applied to defining arguments and practical resolution. Is it irony that litigation has become foundation stone of reptilian society?

Culturally, we take many things, many customs for granted and this has the effect of obscuring our past and shielding painful truths. One can but conclude coherent disharmony has been the plan from outset along a political path crafted by agents of oppression. But how much is this direction result of human greed or might efforts be contributed to a hidden genetic legacy? If we inspect human-reptilian lineage, only a small amount of digging reveals unavoidable entwinement with those convoluted alpha draconian gene paths. Alex Collier writes extensively about the alpha draconian Andromedans (although I conject whether he means blue avians). His reflections on their outpourings are so loaded with benevolent intentions; one almost senses Confucius (balance of things) reincarnated. Though blue avians themselves are demonstrably critical of alpha draconian ideology supporting “ordained” superiority (i.e. chosen people), they routinely view themselves as a partisan higher moral authority, albeit submissive. Genetic cousins, Lyrans are renowned both as knowledge protectors and embellishers of truth (distorters). Sirians (keeper of Atlantis), to the other extreme, are incapable of distortion and might only offer silence to accord preservation of deep secrets. Possibly demonstrating Lyran intent, human instinctively learns to lie as part of developmental rite of passage, pretty much directly after learning to walk. This means human knows deceit before he knows memory. Via reptilian lineages, we are built from a genetic baseline that evidences innumerable alpha draconian creeds. We have all their qualities, good and bad, available within our genetic spectrum. Fortunately, via our hereditary Sirian cerebral cortex, we are obliged to pay homage to conscience. Conscience acts as a natural limiter against deceit. However, do we, similar to reptilians, also have instinctive ability to switch between or adopt particular libidos (i.e. logic versus reptilian emotional brain)? They, I have illustrated before, possess dual pulmonary systems (hot and cold blooded). Effects of different blood produce startling changes of demeanor. These have been immortalized by folklore of the likes of cold blooded calculation or hot blooded passion. The manner in which some human individuals appear to resolutely deactivate their conscience provides more than a glimpse into potential for hidden abilities, in my opinion.

Strange fusion of diametrically opposed abilities (to exude truthfulness and deceit simultaneously) surely places human beneath a karmic unravelling that prepares irreparable divides, harmfully fragmenting spiritual purpose to outright oblivion. It is presumed that spiritual goals would ultimately be consistent all the way up the ladder and not just restricted to “high ups” who know better. Last article I made an introduction to the Enorians; the step between Anunaki and Ba’al. Ba’al is the term used to denote the manifest form of the Anunaki and, as such, provides a physical bridge to outer God (El/Al).  Terminologies used for Enorian, Ba’al, dragon and so on are explicitly colloquial to us. Not one term is authentic, from the cosmic perspective. For instance, Anunaki have been correctly identified as “SSS”, which is a sharply whistled rasping hiss that perhaps approximates a sandstorm tornado running through a town. Anunaki are non-manifest, but to authentically summon root of highest manifest state (archangel) is achievable by a guttural “RRR”. This growling expletive approaches a bear’s howl. We are unable to iterate most sounds either naturally or aided with technology. Knowledge is mysterious, because human is a direct derivative of the Celtic satyr deity Hu. However, our higher genetic ancestry spans reptilian, pteroid, dragon (angel), Ba’al, Enorian and Anunaki and none of these names are authentic. Perhaps they do not want their true identities revealed. When directly quizzed likewise as to their valid identity, reptilians clumsily responded “chakra” (invasive entry point to occupying human). Communication did not compute with receiver, so misquoted translation ciakar remains. Perhaps similar stories can be attributed to all the other naming conventions. Aside from the ones mentioned, it is possible other stages of spiritual ascent exist that I haven’t been privileged to identify. Regardless, we do know (from various accounts, including Robert Morning Sky’s memorable analysis of the wisdom of Bek-ti) the Anunaki faced a monumental split perhaps as far back as 9 billion years ago. Reborn human-like “image of God” Sirians are the sixth devolution of the original genetic template. Specific information is vital to understanding the puzzle that constructs the network holding human in current position.

To be comprehensive, associated considerations are understandably rather complex. New insight suggests that there were multiple hierarchical splits that might be compared to a snake shedding its skin from time to time. In this case though, each skin takes on a fresh momentum of its own. For instance, the “RRR” energy used to form Ba’al has a higher (non-manifest) status than any other part that had previously been discarded by the Anunaki clan. In addition to their “image of God” estrangement, Anunaki were also responsible for creating Thoth (connected to Zetas or Emmerthas). There were two other distinctly obsidian breakaways. One caused oppressive (supremacist) alpha draconian lineages and the other produced matrix cultivating (fantasy as reality) Pleiadians. Adding to complexities, Pleiadian is part Sirian (with cerebral cortex?). A final major Anunaki energy spectrum breakaway leaves no traceable path downwards, so there either weren’t lower echelons or I have not been privy to evidence. Hindu Gods are something of an enigma to me though and could be one possibility of obsolete lineage. These physically existed on Earth just after the great flood (the one that ended Atlantis), but appeared to have wiped themselves out without trace in a cataclysmic “nuclear” war that ended around 9,000 years ago. Options are still open on hereditary genetics. Blue avian qualities are potentially indicative of descendant traits, but conceivably they could be the lowest missing link to an unidentified higher energy breakaway.

Earlier I made mention of angels and archangels specifically to highlight the true nature of dragon and Ba’al as manifest spiritual intermediaries. “Messenger” tradition does not do justice to the deep involvement angelic agencies have with common spiritual direction. Archangel is the most exalted version. Substitute angelic status can be given to any designate party, regardless of body type or creed, so there is no limit to potential contenders. Certain grey beings may have been historically referenced thusly. Reptilians covet many claims (usually emanating from their own ranks) of divine attainment. Though not all rumours have turned out to be accurate or even true, a wide range of different entity types have assumed spiritual emissary status. In light of their direct spiritual authority over us, there may be credence to reptilian admissions. Fundamental angel and archangel assets are the vital clue representing infrastructures of spiritual control under hierarchies. Was the whole (hierarchy and parts) viewed as a “body”, we might compare the overall view to a scene presenting the valiant physician taking steps to avoid illness. In this capacity, taking analogy a step further, an archangel would have a greater number of tools or techniques at their disposal, perhaps equating to a top surgeon. To delve deeper as to why it is so, why angel hierarchies exist at all, we should reflect on the complete picture. It is known that humans have giant bodies composed of “relatively” miniscule atoms. A single human (in the spiritual sense) is the equivalent of any single “atom” taken from the greatest ascent (Anunaki). Pushing trite mortality aside, while most of us feel we have absolute autonomy (or power) over our lives, this is not strictly true. We only have absolute autonomy over our limited capacity to coordinate and cooperate with world view. Aside from that, there is an impossible to traverse chasm prohibiting direct liaison between atoms and the human body, which is primarily why spiritual development is modular.

We must come to terms with the fact all world views stem from identities strictly guided by direct overseeing spiritual hierarchy. To which end, the entire “human group” could be construed as a “collective body” of sorts that is the lower extent of a spiritual funnel. Imagine if one limb of this “collective body” was to receive a catastrophic injury. Leaving it unattended could risk fatally contaminating the whole body. Here role of my hypothetical physician becomes more apparent. Complex steps might best compare with palliative techniques, using angelic resources, rather than a physical examination and operation. It would be worth adding, spiritual resources are comparatively all seeing, so notional last ditch solutions would simply not occur. Lives, from birth to passing, are predicted as a series of causal probabilities (though branching from causality). In truth, this makes prophecy a rather compelling prospect. Free will is a problem for the spiritual hierarchy when insubordinates “break order”. These elements are less likely to be supported with extended lives, but the problem is perennial. Suffice to say, when all spiritual efforts fail, ascent is forced make a desperate choice. To save the body, any broken limb must be amputated (killed). Applying analogy to here and now, perhaps violent ethnic cleansing of people of Gaza is an apt example representing spiritual amputation. Catastrophe in Gaza has been brewing for decades, following the forced removal (and murder) of Palestinian land owners since 1948. That wound has festered and gradually become so malignant, gangrene has potentially already set in.

Astonishingly, the Anunaki may actually be siding with tyrannical oppressor Israel. As they are not direct party to our politics, they have no real understanding of human “morality” equations either. Israel, as perceived stronger force (coupled with corporate America), becomes their likely means to an end of their suffering. Sentiment here needs qualifying. Because from the karmic perspective, which very much overlays the current lopsided “war of attrition”, Israel is destined for terrible retribution; a style of retribution mankind will have never witnessed before. Whether proceedings could provoke an extraordinarily rare cataclysm of the Gods remains to be seen. No cataclysm has ever been recorded in living memory, so consequences cannot be predicted. Israel/Palestine is such a strong example of spiritual breakdown; the issue deserves separate focus. We tend to take for granted that a herd of Russian cows must feel empathy against horrific Indonesian cattle slaughter. Why does anyone beyond Gaza necessarily care about Gazans’ fate? Though most humans only appear capable of sympathy, outrage at atrocities in Palestine, outrage at the genocidal complicity of Israel has permeated to fever pitch across the globe, consuming all creeds, including non-compliant Jews. The impartial observer could not help but assess such syndrome as at least partial consequence of higher body speaking. Many people are killed on local roads by equally unfair consequences, yet few bother to take notice. Israel’s insensitive defense minister of 2010 followed precise logic with his road kill analogy via Spanish Media after deeply unpopular murders of nine or ten aid workers on Turkish Flotilla ship Mavi Marmara as it was “intercepted” by Israeli special forces. Though callousness of statement at the time naturally went down like a lead balloon, from my perspective of wider analysis, sentiment is profoundly insightful. Where do we draw the line and is that line created by humanity or by something that goes beyond human? Are we, on some level, crudely and unknowingly enacting the will of an unseen foreign power?

There is more to the karma debate than meets the eye too. Israel (as a concept), I have long said, was stolen by the Hebrews. Could divinity ultimately be behind “perpetual retribution” against the devil’s state? Moving on, readers aware of my other blog (focusing on timeless real political issues) will be overly familiar with tricks used to impose “Big Brother” on the masses. Influence of little brother is rarely sensationalized and, as such, tends to creep under the gate of wider political calculations. Ancient Greek and Roman authorities exploited and funneled emotionally charged mob “justice” with such fervent professionalism, legacy should be remembered as an art form. Professionalism demands evolution. I, personally, cannot believe techniques were invented by or limited to ancestral Philistines (Roman ancestors). To build networks to establish efficient trust in the grapevine takes enormous time. Without ever humming little brother coordination, it would not be possible to gradually steer and connect all tributaries needed to cement mob solidarity. Mob rule itself is something of a culmination of grass roots factionalism, heralding from Atlantis. Though phenomenon enabling common voices that fermented for extended periods was destined to bubble over into the streets, such mischief mocked-Atlantean tradition. Potential was always there, but impossible beneath sacred order. No sooner than sacred order had been dismantled, chaos was possible. So, how does that look? In grapevine speak, supportive messages immediately resonate, but trust between once estranged parties takes persistence to rebuild. Echo effect escalating rapid broadcast of configured common views are now daily witnessed on Twitter and Facebook. Corruption exposed, many message seeds turn out to have originally been proliferated by Big government think tanks of one kind or another. To be clandestine is the rule, whether that be by admission or context. Transparency is the exception.  In other words, processes collaborate a collective framework of influence (from on high), which is the logical underlying purpose of creation of human, providing there was a “creator”.  Atheist (removing the Creator) Big government and its extended agencies have merely leveraged natural purpose to their advantage.

Of all “rights” that might be targeted, there is no better example of political exploitation than objectives that target and remove human sexual rights, beginning with Moses’ blasphemous (and sexist) “commandment” “thou shalt not look at another woman licentiously” (thou shalt not covet your neighbour’s wife). To add, “thou shalt not commit adultery” comes close to denying sexual liberty altogether (a notion capitalized on by biblical new testament “reformed” persecutor, St Paul). Menacing austerity does at least provide marriage celebrants unlimited license to procreate. Failing the emergence of prostitution, the only means to enter sexual relations used to be by marriage, ensuring participants succumb as prisoners of state and slaves of each other. Modern trends towards common relationships has eaten away at sacredness of marriage to such extents that divorce statistics dwarf longevity. Ushered in with the new age is a farce against pedophilia that should be judged as pathological obsession. Few consider the fact that age “consent” cements role of state. Without consent providing “rights”, peoples are not necessarily “citizens”. From identical principles, those unable to consent are those without rights.  So, while we may have largely broken free of marital enslavement; humanity is far from “free” sexually. How “state” rolled out its power grab is plain to see. Successive political “coups” arbitrarily increased naturally illegitimate “age of consent” (license only to procreate) from age zero to twelve to fifteen and then to eighteen years, with the ever reaching elitist aim of increasing to age twenty-one. Authorities evoked those milestone dictates (stage by stage) into law with arbitrary (and not reasoned) debate, forsaking any notion of “democracy”.

Achievements of autocratic measures are muted. Associated schisms throughout society are an everyday occurrence, examples including so-called terrible teens stage of development and that “underage” pregnancy monster. In light of the illogical attack on sexual freedoms, has a higher agenda impacted current course of events? Here there are two possibilities (perhaps in combination) that spring to mind. For this we would need to contemplate how our spiritual seniors view sexuality. By example (brethren Anunaki) Sirian only formally uses sexual drive to procreate. Was human design deliberately calculated to “recreate” mini-Sirian, then that would explain why our reptilian [direct] creators failed to allow for the effect of lust on our libido. As evidence more than suggests that they interfered with thematic intent behind ancient folklore and governance, such intrigue shows all the indicators of planned “drip fed” human acculturalization. It is ironic that we are of almost identical sexual character to reptilians. It seems to me that, via their institutional takeover, we have been perceived as something we were not. The other responsible consideration as to a phantom “higher agenda” coveting desired results that contradict nature is how much “instinct” towards sexually excluding marital union (whether temporary or long standing) is natural or contrived. Sirians observe a strange practice, which equates to what they would call sexual meditation. Participating individuals would congregate into sexual groups with the objective of harmonizing aligned energies to mutual benefit. Defying human prudishness, the custom is not perceived to contra marriage boundaries.

It seems vital, factoring our physical closeness to reptilian, for a full inspection of differences to progress investigations efficiently. So, from the direct sexual comparison, one startling observation is they possess no anus, which obviously deeply both impacts performance “options” and culture (to some degree). Gay male sexual intercourse is rendered null and void. We were created by beings with comparative deficiencies, which beggars the question, was human given an anus to make gay intercourse possible? Contradicting the affirmative, if they interfered with all Scriptural records, there would be unanswered mystery as to why biblical and other ancient traditions vehemently stand against sodomy, in particular. Perhaps resulting “gestalt” is a distortion caused from the uneasy attempt at coupling incompatible reptilian and Sirian morality. Without debate, associated conflict is played out through humanity, though differences in overall perceptive values (of human versus reptilian) could well play a part too. An example of perceptive differences is as follows. Abductees with direct interactive experience, themselves oblivious to pollution, claim that reptilians say we stink. Conversely, though they naturally defecate via the mouth, which sounds appalling, each compact fecal pellet is coated with a thick mucus so as to prohibit odour or content leakage. In addition, body skins neither sweat nor breathe (as far as I am aware). Epidermis, instead, prepares complete fusion with surrounding energy field to provide the body a constant “connection” with the external. Advantages go beyond mere interactivity between reality and infrastructures that establish a “stationary” ever-present spiritual network, ability possibly stemming from latent dragon heritage. It is worth noting here the dragon energy field was so expansive it could swallow Earth, although I am unclear whether this was enabled by “collective” cooperation of the entire group. Ancient human communes reputedly had similar, though less reaching, powers that could siphon off energy resources from the planet’s centre.

Reptilian ability to harmonise interconnection between body and external field can focus energy polarization to allow quantum manipulation functionality, such as converting body (which is energy) and energy field in combination to create a directive gateway. By comparison, their skin arguably offers greater power of visibility than our eyes. Actually, here we have innocently stumbled on one of the dazzling secrets of existence. Discussing the energy field as a part of the body (by extension) is not strictly true. Each body actually hosts a version of the master field. Individual bodies represent unique calibrations of the master field. However, from the access perspective, fields are constantly external and thus offset from the body, though body is permanent gateway to field and vice versa. The field itself is striated so as to precipitate energy focal points, such as chakras. Focal points become doorways, whether used for incoming or outgoing traffic. In effect, energy that builds each unique field is the “spirit”. It will become clear how this impacts sexual comparisons between human and reptilian soon. Few recognise fundamental difference between spirit and soul, but knowledge cannot be overstated. Suffice to say, I have grave doubts any reader here, moreover anyone on the planet knows precisely why spirituality is called thus in deference to soulality. If the truth was even slightly known, vogue materialist occultism would instantly evaporate. Spirituality is a tradition people only pay lip service to. For sure, some may say their spirituality augments personal pathway towards divinity, but they still do not know what the term itself actually construes.

We might turn to Apache Indian tradition for wider insight here. Natives traditionally believe wolves and white buffalo (American bison) though not (now extinct) wood, mountain varieties or feral hounds, possess spirits. Wolves and white buffalo to them are spiritual beings. But what of animals that do not possess spirits? They may be catered for (spiritually) by a provisional ectoplasm generated from the soul network as a bi-product that also “charges” lower celestial living things. However, as far as I can ascertain a pet cat would not possess chakras (at least, in the common sense). Perhaps evidence of spiritual connection is implied by the extraordinary affinity native Indians had with horses. Other higher creatures might certainly include dolphins, whales, trees and perhaps even certain stick insects. Some argue snakes and other reptiles show empathetic tendencies, which is intriguing. Pigs can be as sensitive as man. The list I am sure does not end there. What is clear is spiritual fields are not necessarily calibrated or structured comprehensively across common [reality] domains. Human fields [effectively] extend conscience, which [by a process of elimination] can be deemed result of our cerebral cortex, direct evidence of Sirian lineage. Compared with our lowest genetic superior reptilian, though they do possess traces of Sirian in their DNA spectrum, brain has nothing resembling the cerebral cortex and cannot generate conscience. By extension, this means their spiritual makeup cannot resemble human equivalency. So why do they have extraordinary powers when we do not? It is eminently possible we do have powers. It is possible we, bison, wolves, dolphins and all the other spiritual beings are bestowed with tools even that make interdimensional travel possible, but I do not know of one instance where any living thing (in the conventional sense) travelled by any means other than using their own natural volition, sometimes aided by technology. Not a single dematerialization, materialization. Not a single meditated time skip. Not one.

Using the process of elimination again, even with lack of defining guidelines, critical differences in behaviour respond to energy fields that cannot be not uniform. Reptilians, we know, take behaviour to a whole new level with their ability to convert themselves into pure energy and invade chakras as open doorways. We know (Sirian) miracles are not exclusively achieved aided by conscience, because reptilians don’t have a conscience. Conversely, it is possible to deduce energy field calibration very different to human conscience equivalency causes some figurative baseline compatibility. In fact, this beggars the reasonable question as to whether energy field “calibrations” are key to allowing specific functionality (i.e. reptilian is calibrated to permit energy conversion, whereas human is not). We know a master field exists and this is not part of (or even attached to) the body. But what generates the master field? Logic alone dictates master field must be a provision or consequence of spiritual source and therefore, due to trickle effect, all versions capture the root of divine spirituality. Thus, all energy fields (in their different calibrations) combined as one would create “the whole” of our divine ascent spectrum, be it that each divinity component would be a limited aspect of almighty God. Before I return to analysis identifying differences defining reptilian and human sexuality, it is worth reflecting on the following. Because all spiritual beings are wholly constructed from resources emanating from their most senior ascent (in the case of Anunaki “bloodlines”, the Anunaki), spirituality is not limited by ascent. Limitation is imposed by access restrictions. It might seem out of context, but Grey beings vaguely described in Raymond Fowler’s “The Andreasson Affair” are documented to have presented a topically relevant blue book to abductee “Betty” Andreasson. In accordance, the Greys provided a profoundly important explanation (highlighting their emissary/angel status). The book, they said, contained writing made of light that could only be read by the spirit. They added, the key to all things [problems] affecting man can be discovered in nature. Such news can mean but one thing, which is the spirit is fully integrated with nature and fully accessible via nature.

To emphasise, the Anunaki energy field is so flexible it transcends time and space to avail synthetic connections between interdimensional networks; a facility exploited to the full by Lyran/reptilian espionage (something I discussed at length previous article). There have been wide ranging and quite compelling reports from people who claim to have met with “God”, in this instance Jesus Christ. Details are often so similar to abductee accounts, even though deity or guiding identity can vary, I wonder whether initiative is a wholesale attempt at corruptive influence of humanity. Many years ago as a small boy, I was presented a dream that still haunts me today. I saw an immaculate shining “Jesus” from afar, but as I inched towards the icon, the skin gradually turned to olive brown and wrinkled. Close up, I saw a horrible face, crawling with maggots. Was this a premonition of the takeover of humanity under the illusion of an immaculate Christ? This deception aided by fusion of otherwise alien timelines of course is a logical affront to nature. Affront maybe, but opportunity hasn’t stopped other worldly “colonialists”. When nature is unfettered, an analogical Holy Trinity “binds” the highest God directly to body [of man] via the holy spirit, using intermediaries such as Anunaki. That said, we should now press on with the mission at hand; revelatory analysis of critical commonalities and differences between sexual physiologies of man and reptilian. Though I don’t necessarily know who or “what” I connect with, over the course of investigations I have been shown many illustrative diagrams. One such vision demonstrated a creature that conveyed the presence of a pet mutt that went through a remarkably indulgent swooping display that reminding me of a land based otter or seal. Was it not for the poetic nature of each swoop, I would have been convinced the odd creature was chasing invisible insects. Two of the most unnatural “flaps” were attached to the top of the head and these would agitate violently with each movement. To my disbelief, following briefing, it turned out that these were novel sex organs. I can but presume such example had been selected to challenge breadth of my perceptive reasoning. As with all other human beings, I frame perceptions from cultural references. What I had witnessed was energetically so unusual, nothing I knew of or could imagine on Earth would correspond. If the example wasn’t simply an “imagined” test, origins then must have emanated from an entirely different reality.

A small error of context was made earlier. Reptilian anatomy varies across different types. In place of the anus, tailless varieties possess a tract that has similarities with human design. Buttocks are comparatively shallow, nevertheless. From sexual potency perspective, a tract might nominally compare with a human ear or nostril. In other words, reptilian anal equivalency offers no conceivable sexual value. Instead (I am told) function is basically similar to our sweat gland though, in practicality, almost never used. Varieties with tails have no tract, but palms of the hands are capable of excreting “lotion”. Reptilians, unlike us, are not adventurers. They are obsessively risk adverse. So, in normal circumstances, not to stress the body (which might cause need to sweat) is the overruling desire. Here it is also worth adding that their “sweat” has a texture and consistency of hand lotion, which is odourless and comes with a silky or chalky taste. Strangely enough, ability to perspire as outlined measurably increases potency of the palms. Is this where mythology of laying on of hands originates? Jesus’ legendary healing powers must have surely originated somewhere. Put functionally, skin is the membrane connecting body to “holy spirit” in holistic union, though ability to redirect holy spirit with confidence and precision goes beyond standard science comprehension. Thus, I would like to explore notional skin power more deeply. Details exposing how reptilians find skin to skin contact ashamedly erotic have been discussed before, but are worth review from renewed topical perspective.

So to refresh old news, youths that enter their version of university system are given various compulsory modules aimed at improving sexual discipline. One such module contributes to study of “lust management”. Curriculum, in this instance, lasts six months and is aimed at instructing students on disciplines required to completely disassociate from lustful urges. Field situations place particular focus on testing management of skin to skin contact. We know their skin is very sensitive, but some additional background here. They generally divide expressive sexuality into four quadrants. One of these, sex as means to connect with God logically implicates skin to skin contact (allowing gateway to cultivate “mutual” or twin spirits). Akin philosophy was known of and at one time practiced by Gnostics (although participants used mundane intercourse as the connection catalyst). Accordingly, in ancient biblical times, surrogate female “gateways to bliss” (making spiritual connection possible) were normally innocent early teens or younger. Compared with reptilian societies, where sexual spirituality is seen as a sign of maturity, females [in particular] will join social groups sometimes at very young ages, but never as surrogates. These participate in erotic orgies. Wider society welcomes such curiosity from young as hallowed rite of passage. Indeed, some would go as far to compare the step to baptism. Here we can see, in some ways, there are no comparisons between “our” and “their” cultural values and taboos. I wonder whether “paedophilia” is an overlap. But the other labored point I have been trying to make is there is a direct connection with skin allowing access to and management of “power of God”.

Information supplied to me by unknown providers can come either in the form of pure knowledge or diagrams. When I receive diagrams, situations are not usually contextually clear. Greater clarity is achieved when a session is interactive. In one instance while researching reptilians, I accidentally fused into an individual. Fusion was not full, but enough to do more than empathise with alien point of view. Experience permitted realization that our conscience has a relatively huge impact on the manner we perceive and judge things, in particular. Of course, everything changes fundamentally when you lose vital connection to conscience. To reptilians, purging of one’s enemies comes as a matter of fact. Remorse or even consideration as to consequences of actions are notions so illogical, no one would even think of them. Whether in denial or not, every human is acutely aware of the impact we have on the external. Alright, some of us become sloppy and lazy and lacking in sensitivity, but we all in our heart of hearts know right from wrong. Reptilians “tick” on an entirely different wavelength. However, their greatest strength is a human’s greatest fault. We will go to extraordinary lengths to avoid or dismiss information that contradicts belief systems. They will listen and attempt to appreciate anything, regardless of motive. This is not to say they necessarily agree with or follow suggestions dutifully, but will take in and assess everything seen on balance. If humanity followed a similar standard, transition would do us a power of strength.

From all the strangeness, there is some commonality. Comparing conventional sexual apparatus, reptilian and human are fairly similar. As with us, the male possesses a penis and female has a sexually functional tract; version of the vagina, though there are perhaps small “operational” differences. I am not sure, for instance, if the vulva is included in their anatomic make up. Be that as it may, while reproductive mechanics are not entirely the same as human, consistencies exist. Their females are egg laying and this obviously impacts reproductive equations. Ironically, human embryos are cultured in an egg sack of sorts, but it disintegrates at birthing. As far as I can ascertain (though I have witnessed no firsthand experience), egg casing is left intact immediately after a reptilian is born. Evidence may be lacking to corroborate the female profile, but I do have direct experience of male organs. Never shown the testicles (perhaps these are internal to the body?), I would describe the member as dark coloured, possibly deep indigo, quite thick (compared to human), with a flayed, much more circular bulbous “head” which has no noticeable foreskin. Was the ancient Jewish practice of circumcision made in homage to emulate their captor “Gods”? Aside from this point of view, there is lack of entirely logical argument justifying tradition. Not to concede superficially valid basis both for and against, more aptly, logic defines circumcision as more detrimental than beneficial to body health. Other external accounts present the reptilian organ as “significantly” larger than human, [dark] blue in colour, confirming mine. With these, I have also found no references to testicles, but believe they do have something “functionally” similar to human.

Neither male nor female possessing any body hair is another significance, but I would like to focus on the female for this part of my analysis. Several articles back I discussed deep historic times when humans had fully broken free of reptilian occupation. Then societies had begun championing kings or chieftains, some of whom were [what we would term] “part extra-terrestrial”. Following spectacular reptilian ascension around 8,000 or 9,000 years ago, some of the lower (less spiritually developed) brethren remained associated with our reality sphere. They did not have any real presence on the Earth surface. Because most of the grand group had disappeared, to find a reptilian was a dragon’s quest. Remainders appear to have had a fear of integration with human society, but, over time, this subsided and they perhaps became curious, but certainly desirous to reconnect with us (in context, their progeny). Thinking about this thinking pragmatically, the most effective mechanism for lasting connection is creation of descendant bloodlines. My sources hint Sumarian origins when according reptilian females entered into “marriage” with their human male counterparts. I have never been given precise details as to the how’s and why’s, but offspring were produced that developed body hair. Novelty for them of course, hybrid “talents” were revered by the reptilian contingency. I wonder whether that is the hubris of mythology associated with “power of the hair” (such as Samson)? Prolonged contamination of the wider human gene pool appears evident by characteristically reptilian nature of our women when compared against males. Interestingly, shaving of genitalia is a much more common ritual amongst our females than males.

Whether today anyone exists to preserve evidence of pre reptilian-fused human genome pool is a rather intriguing quandary. Aside from the sexual, there are other more perfunctory and, dare I say undignified behaviours. These include need to expel wind. In such regard, reptilians are only capable of belching. Associated emissions can produce foul odours though. Sexual anatomies do not expel any noticeable pongs, surprisingly. Returning to intricate design of the reptilian penis, I have found no male equivalent in human. Our males of course have the urethra, which is either used to ejaculate semen or excrete urine. Likewise, urethras consistently extend to a vertical slit at the tip of the penis. There are no known “variants” to my knowledge. For reptilians, here design is similar, except the slit is longer and, at the tip, two tracts fuse as one. Their urine excretion apparatus is configured to deliver dual discharges. Impurities are concentrated as a reddish brown “oil” with remainders distilled into clear “saline”, which can also be used to “flush out” the other tract, used for ejaculating semen. According to my sources, certain foreign “adventurers” are known to have hunted for reddish brown waste fluids as a prized “elixir”. This may well be an attempt at reptilian humour, but I do note the ancient Tai Chi custom of drinking one’s own first urine daily “as an essential minerals supplement”. Reptilian produces more than urine or semen to dispensed by the penis and that is the significant difference to man.

Conceptually speaking, perfunctory sexual intercourse is consistent with human approach and that is possibly why reptilian women were able to naturally reproduce with human kings. Though perhaps unanswerable, how much human-reptilian nature has been cause of evolutionary genetics is the great mystery. Equally, to what extent early cross-breeding has contaminated the original genepool is a perplexing quandary. Biblical Genesis’ enigmatic passage “and the sons of Gods found the daughters of man desirable” (or words to the effect) amplified by sections of the pseudepigraphal book of Enoch do more than suggest gene pool contamination has been widespread. Knowledge must be significant for information to even warrant a mention in Genesis, so text should not be taken lightly. My analysis of the small physical anatomical differences separating reptilian genus from our own is only one tiny part of the equation. For instance, sexuality is not limited as an exclusive tool either for procreation or recreation, but more as the very means to allow eternal connection to sponsor “relationships”. Whether the medium is perceived as facilitator or driver, without it connections would arguably be irrelevant. The core of our being is our sexuality (hence base chakra associated with life expectancy) and therefore, it compellingly follows that at the core of any being is the desire to be sexual. If God also desires connection, then [by association] God must be sexual, which confirms sexuality is a “rite”. Hence, “lost” ancient religious tradition. To deny is to deny divinity. Of course, here we move away from sexual “mechanics”, to focus mostly on “intimate intent”.

Need for intimacy bind families, can percolate friendships, becomes the basis for fostering business relationships, causes government “secrets” and, of course, must be the backbone of any sincere marriage. Do Babylonian ankh represent human [energy] deposits, symbolically portrayed as the stylish “tuning fork”? Does “tuning” approbate condition of intimacy? Before I review the significance, we should isolate philosophies that determine the extent of what is sexual, ideally shining light on administrative glue that holds human “spirituality” in position. Reptilian basic equations tabling the extent of what it is to be sexual have been outlined in previous articles here. They traditionally review four “quadrants” or pillars. Essential procreation of course is a primary function, but other definitions are less straightforward. There is a spiritual function (touched on earlier in this essay) which presupposes a concrete role for the body’s energy field as “intermediary” [with God]. Recreational use is by no means seen as flippant. Recreation is actually construed as an essential component of common living and, by association, such integration empowers the libido (probably extending life – a compelling argument, in light of base chakra functionality). In other words, they view recreational sex as both necessary and therapeutic. All that aside, in its most condensed form (potency), to them sexuality is a “divine constant” that runs through all subordinate life forms and, as such, is the ultimate form of expression. Predisposition towards self-sacrificing intimacy is revered as the core value dividing Gods from despicable mortals.

Unavoidably selfish human worldview must be inclined to promote self-empowerment, which means, when push comes to shove, at the expense of others. So sacrifices (all the way up to martyrdom) arise as response to development of moral, political or instinctive calculations. From the subjective philosophical standpoint (at least) most, if not all, sacrifices compliment preferred beneficial outcomes and can be devices acting as means to ends that extend way beyond incidents in question. When someone charitably loans an idle car to a needy traveler in distress, from one perspective he has found a “use” for his “useless” vehicle. By the very fact the car has been “put to use” by charity is a benefit. What is certain is all actions are ego driven, with pursuits that create events having potential to either foster gatherings with would be friends or conflict against perceived outcasts. Societies are naturally guided to implement strata as means to diffuse or avoid conflicts. However, because corporate communication networks have become so sophisticated and far reaching, the war against the outcast “other” (sometimes euphemised as foreigner) has expanded. A once thriving sea of connected enclaves has been tormented into one ocean of volatile discordance under dystopian suffrage of globalism, disharmony particularly apparent in supposed multi-cultural “havens” (of the likes of United States of America). The more divisively vain “powers” attempt to dissipate ill-sentiment, the greater the reactive inclination towards offence and spiraling revenge. In light of this, it is starkly understandable why the idea portraying sexuality as the ultimate form of communication does not philanthropically resonate at any level of society. In human terms, sexuality has become a tool to demonstrate superiority, a tool for exclusion and an attractive (or St Paul argued “necessary”) inconvenience distracting Godliness. Because human is selfish, sexuality is the epitome of selfishness. Human has no sexual “right”, according to utopian law, until wielding power behind governance is corrupted. Because of judicial paradox (the Law can be anything WE decide so), humanity’s vision of encompassing sexuality is broken. Humanity has only been blessed with the power to choose, but with choices removed by austerity, doesn’t this mean we have been rendered powerless, impotent?

There is another fundamental issue mentioned in past articles that deserves consideration. Utopian human is the transposition of a holy trinity (descent of divine objectives) which, from the sexual perspective, is played out to ensure parts contradict each other. Obviously, purpose of this essay is to “expose the pieces of the network that controls humanity”. Might sexuality be a big piece of that puzzle? You would have thought, at the very least, sexuality should have been considered a big draw card by our creators. As an aside, such notion would promote the idea that sexual “activation” begins prior to birth and the main reason no one notices is because of divisive corruption administered by high profile agencies wishing to deceive the Gods’ interests. Dissecting our spiritual trinity, reptilian aspect certainly becomes more than it would seem, as expressed through genetic composition. Whereas fumbling science oversimplifies routine classification of wholly human ape, the irony is human is substantively ape and therefore, from simplicity’s perspective, information is quintessentially correct. We are a version of ape, although the big question no one has come close to answering is “what the hell is ape?” I will leave this unanswered for now, but perhaps we will discover clues in reptilian sexual makeup. One diverging commonality worth highlighting is apes are driven by lust and the need to communicate, whereas to a reptilian “love” is a combination of lust and infatuation.

Certain aspects of knowledge embedded in our established traditions are not inherently human. Because we are capable of fatal attraction, immortalized teachers warned of confusing infatuations over love, warned of potential interpretive ambiguity almost impossible to decisively avoid. Certain anti-lust traditions would otherwise be insincere, unless advice had been given by some detached alien landlord, unable to vent “corrupted love”. Complication grows via our reptilian ancestry that ensures we are incapable of not infatuating. Love component is explicit evidence of manifest Sirian qualities. Sirians (as introduced earlier) are from direct evolution of the Anunaki. Therefore, true love is probably the highest existential quality impacting our physical domains. Here considerations start to become interesting, of course. Original Sirians had no means to reproduce physically as they possessed no genitalia. Reproductive intent had to be a developmental expression of like minds. Though the process itself was very intimate and rewarding for participants, in some ways equating to mundane copulation, exchanges and outcomes were combinations of energetic and angelic purity. Resulting “seed” caused energy ball “womb” to come into effect, which would produce a bonny but fully grown adult within days of conception. Later versions of Sirian first displayed mock genitalia, but as time went on, organs were given non-reproductive functionality. Of course, numerous hybrids exist now with full human sexual potency equivalency, but pure bloods can still only reproduce with their minds.

The idea of “God” stealing in and impregnating women in their sleep is not as far-fetched as many might consider. Focusing on a biblical tradition that presupposes sex is purposely limited to procreation, such thinking is partially supported by circumstantial evidence of Gods directly amending human genetic evolution. Underlying considerations must heed the fact that synthetic reproduction will match natural order to be effective. Natural order proposes one man, one woman. Even reptilians have no choice but to assume binary status of relationships that permit sexual intercourse to keep bloodlines afloat. Though nature dictates that reproductive acts could bear offspring, alternatives fail. This is not to say nature cannot be tampered with. Humans have “contraceptives”. These, when reviewed mundanely (and without comforting spin of marketing propaganda), actually poison the rite to fertility and, thus (from the spiritual perspective) could be judged as “anti-God”. The Catholic position may not be “convenient”, but it is pious. Conversely, certain aspects of biblical tradition could be viewed as heresy. Bible and other supposedly holy works comprise sideline commentaries. When factoring in censorship under various synods and so forth, “acceptable” groups of documents become a censoring transformation of collective propagandas. Every holy writing from time memorial either offers eye witness accounts or opinions made by (oh so fallible and corrupt) human beings. The best we can hope for is perfect human assessment. Since time memorial, God (Himself) has failed to produce an operational instruction manual or even a single word. Regardless of what prophecy may conject, from the ultimate spiritual perspective, we don’t know “why” human is sexually wired “as seen” or why he was given an anus, beyond obvious functional day to day necessity. Necessity maybe, ancient Greeks did pertinently conclude the anus made the perfect contraception solution, which also objectively (i.e. by a creator) affirmed homosexual relationships.

From that natural perspective, procreation decidedly is the critical function of human sexuality. Sirian, well advanced up the spiritual ladder, would predictably champion the obvious. However, universal philosophical objectives (i.e. cause for growth) can accommodate many conceptual advantages including mundane paradigms that constitute just about any conceivable behaviour. At their extraordinary elevation, we should not lose sight of the fact, Sirians are also fundamental prisoners of “binary order” which only permits offspring from one man and one woman combined and this must influence judgement. Zeta grey being cultures are reputedly able to create birthing “clones”, whether to extend life or reproduce. Processes are able to select or reject genetic features. Reproductive die casts are prepared from desired elements to distinguish binary compatible male or female genetic identifiers. Reptilian ideology serves well to highlight levels of fanaticism (we might say) dedicated to achieve utopian objectives. Couples go to unimaginable lengths to maximize desired conceptual genetic output. Comparably, humans more or less completely trust to luck in the procreation lottery. Reptilian counterparts will do their upmost to predict and control precise foetal results. Implications are controversially dystopian. Morally, their society at large tends draw the line at results (or the end justifies the moral means) with some using abortion (or, worse still, serial abortion) as their ultimate route to victory.

In practicality, all species are bound to (and which is reptilian traditional) produce two offspring to keep populations in check. Commitment to not over produce is evidence by the fact they never extend to beyond four offspring per household. In light of this, one might sympathise with their desperate obsession over reproductive perfection. Any bulk standard family has two shots at expansion and that’s it. Another avenue of consideration deserved reflection here. Everything was something before, which means everything (within a given spectrum) is made of the components that transcend time space reality (grades of light per recycled existence). Format includes supporting hierarchical networks with “owner” of infrastructure. So, does reptilian sense of reproductive purpose oblige senior Anunaki needs? On from this, where needs of body end and evolution of spirit begins is the vital consideration. The same basic parameters could be applied to any spiritual beings with physical bodies. Some may feel biblical Genesis overstates the ongoing conflict between maternal body and pathways to divinity, but there is no clarity over what constitutes effective purity or how any applied indulgence might counter “hallowed” survival. Though from the body’s exclusive perspective, colonialists were instinctively right in the presumption survival is the primary interest of the body, the body is not nor ever will be spiritual. Spirits avail physical functionality and are bound to respect apparatus (body) for continued prime functionality (withstanding natural degradation).

Theoretical “innocent” infants as symptomatic evidence everyone is born as a moral “blank sheet” is not strictly true. Karmic baggage does critically impact notional innocence so, from that perspective, forward visibility is [at best] psychologically impaired. Nevertheless, each new body (over those formative stages) is hard pressed to keep up with adopting common rapid learning rituals merely to function within the framework of existent reality. In such capacity, we more or less immediately learn that the external obsessively governs internal. No one can deny aspects of life path are predetermined, although a simple change of scenery can have drastic consequences (positive or negative) on a life. Vigorous analysis of phenomena would doubtlessly show that most lives are more predestined than otherwise. Associated truth goes beyond tradition and acculturalization, impacting how and “why” we do what we do. Thinking of spiritual implications, if we were to travel up the hierarchical ladder to the point where life no longer needed “form” or bodies, would determining factors change? Living, as any form or medium, must consist of canopies that coordinate internal with external. Whether you are a simple crawling life form on Earth or an immense vaporous tract of space, it is impossible to avoid contact with that which is external to you. Possibilities allow for the external to be either benign or animated, but associated calculations as to “value” of integration are identical for insignificant and mighty alike. Whereas benign won’t force engagement and are presumably oblivious to any connective interactions, moving identities are faced with choices pertaining to or management of connections, providing avoidance is not possible.

From the entirely spiritual perspective, “choice” is the only fundamentally unarguable “right” any living thing has. Such right is of course limited to faculty. Conflicts over divine responsibility are an unavoidable consequence when needs of body are desperately at odds with the path to righteousness. Unsurprisingly, aligned contradiction travels all the way up the genetic ladder, which has been highlighted by one the Anunaki’s disastrous cultural experiments. To outline, looking back at the period just prior to the first reign commencing Gilgamesh’s perplexing “Babylonian king’s list”, effervescent Anunaki had entered into contract with Sirians somehow. Subsequent to arrangements, they had been tasked with establishing an environment which would make surrogacy possible, as they don’t have bodies of their own. When all parties were eventually in position to design a worthy solution, preliminary analysis concluded Sirians would make perfect hosts for the needed role as primary tier descendants of the now disbanded group. What could go possibly wrong? Well, everything. Philosophy had failed to factor “choice” and radicalized cultural conditioning into equations. Sirians simply could not be Anunaki as they had evolved too far adrift of cultural identity since their divergence away from the bloodline. They had sufficiently diverged and that divergence could not be undone. Specific consequence ensured that the proposed gross product, one sided cooperation to attain Anunaki ideals, watered down to compromise, which significantly favoured Sirian libido. Thus and perhaps predictably, surrogacy ended up both corrupting Anunaki and Sirian outlook. Corruption had not only not fulfilled objective wishes, but had arguably created “gestalt” far worse than either part was independently of the other.

In their attempts to resurrect the past, Anunaki had awoken a monster. By directly interfering against destiny, they had innocently violated the divine path, which incurred wrath of karma. So, in terms of lessons to be learned, does this indicate that divinity goes all the way up to “source of everything” and, as such, deeply impacts all states of being? Does it necessarily follow that mysterious ancient “An” (inner almighty God) has always been an integral aspect of all consuming reality, at each level of spiritual attainment? Are hierarchical strata aware of the potential for their own spiritual contamination or divergence from source? Evidence seems to point towards different aptitudes of cooperative understanding. If Anunaki surrogacy was an immortal sin, reptilians have certainly overstepped the mark by committing chakra invasions that sometimes border on “possession” of the human body. Karmic consequences certainly impact the abductee. Numerous cases have been documented. Do reptilians pay the price too? Moving up the spiritual ladder, from occasional reports of “unconfirmed” active connections, to my knowledge, Anunaki do not attempt to override any aspects of human faculty. It is appropriate to add here, along with Jesus potentially, reptilians commonly “pose” as Anunaki to lure “deemed gullible enough” abductees into compliance. Lyran hybrids are also recorded to have introduced themselves in a similar vein. Looking at what is happening around the current Israeli “war” (excuse for civil purge? Commercial gas fields takeover?) against Palestine is symbolic of “absolute power” pitched against that which is subordinate/mortal.

Conclusions will be interesting, but, on reflection, we have undeniably become that out of step with source, consequences are now unavoidable and will be felt. If we look at the background to this, far from considering potential for legitimate blasphemy, offending human heretics, absolute phonies regularly vilify slaughter as “righteous” (war is peace). The mockery that is dubbed blasphemy by implausible religions avoids any confrontation over who is ultimately responsible for the “spark of life” and rules for preservation. In the wake of reason and any real authority, megalomaniacal presumptions impose a trans-human agenda that will collectively morph into God upon the instant he was summonsed. How does this ideologically differ from Anunaki/Sirian experiments? Ideology of the current fraud extends and encapsulates human group (God) volunteering permissible “liberation” of self through “ordained”, “righteous” slaughter. Reptilians may no longer imprison or kill human beings simply to stamp their mark on authority, but these exact same tactics are being played out by Israel currently. Is such “coincidence” actually more evidence of indirect obsidian control?  Are “Satanists” another “front”? Because they can no longer physically interact, if they were hell bent on ownership of their “property”, it is unlikely Sephardic leaders would dismiss evolutionary advantages (outlined earlier) to allow us to breathe as an unfettered spiritually developing species.

Such developments are the tip of a hidden hierarchical genetic agenda. However, superior divine objectives [effectively] interweave through and beyond all other agendas. There is no escaping omnipresence. Though, ultimately, everything “great or small” is humbled by true divinity, evidence is perhaps notionally impossible to demonstrate in anything short of philosophical terms. We can clearly discern that objective purpose does not change as spirituality plummets to the depths of reality; mortal existence. The problem, its seems to me, is disruptive religious morality which is more guided by polarization of opinions than valid efforts to concord with harmonic nature of things. That is why Moses construed fundamental abominations as “commandments”, out of tune with nature, but in tune with political interests and preferred management of human beings. Yet, such is the influence of polarization, over the ages few have been brave enough to even mildly challenge entrenched doctrines. The so-called Holocaust (hoax, as portrayed) and most recent abomination “woke” have paved legitimacy for Frankenstein monsters. Along with the lies, dependence on unnatural technology is precipitous. I have yet to be given clarify on whether Zeta grey beings are unable to produce offspring without the aid of cloning technologies. Such innovations have been retro-engineered by reptilians. Subsequently, one of their primary rites of passage at youth stage is availability to choose a brand new cloned permanent body. Sex type choice is immaterial. Most reject the opportunity because of the impact to existing spiritual legacy (active memory is wiped clean by the transfer process). But specific to credibility of woke arguments, reptilians, Zetas, Lyrans, Sirians, Lemurians and every other species I know of in that network reap offspring from binary families fertilized by one man and one woman. There is a “tall grey” hermaphrodite species that at one time was resident on Earth. Members are subject to the same rules as the rest of us. Males and females with similar bodies are born into their roles. Recent history has produced a reproduction crisis, because of a massive male birth swing. Even with functioning physical anatomy, males have proven unwilling or unable to successfully birth natural offspring.

Sure, some others mentioned have evolved sufficiently to remove the need for mundane copulation or even those endearing “childhood” stages, but the point is that fundamental “trinity”: father, mother, child conceptually goes all the way up the hierarchy to the very top. I have written about how stars “spore” (from behind time space continuum). Though I cannot confirm, perhaps there are “male” and “female” stars too. Could anyone refute the accusation? If the key as to newborn attributes are exclusively found in the DNA (which is ultimately composed of light), then, by deduction, we can determine that it is DNA which allows uniformity to persist all the way up and back down the spiritual ladder. Clearly,.parameters precipitating or permeating seeding are equally as and possibly more important than overall genepool resources. For whomever controls our genepool, owns the direction of human evolution. So, of course our direct superiors (in the genetic sense) must, at the very least, have made an indirect b-line to shore up their asset. Culturally this would explain paradoxical two-step of paranoia towards and celebration of unholy unions warranting unplanned child production. Moses incorrectly implies lust is sparked by licentiousness, when the reverse is true, but was motive inspired by reptilian belief in disciplined control of natural urges? Here lust is a natural urge at war against the desire to behave licentiously. Though all ten commandments (bar one true God) are spiritual abominations, they do resonate with practical interests of harmonized “civilization”.

Genuine scholars will concede there are always flipsides to any argument. Philosophy appending planned childhood as provision of parental ownership distorts humble goodwill embedded in the trinity model as a gross “autocracy”. State takes none of the burden after branding parent slave to authority, by conceiving child as slave to parent, reinforcing synthetic God tied to nonexistent “rights”. Sincere utopian society would create flexibility around rules that define what “a parent” is; sentiment I plan to touch on later. Yet, with all our flaws, human sense of morality is all we have. No replacement is coming along soon. Testament to millions of failed attempts to create suitable new hybrid versions, nature not only refuses to preserve anything that sufficiently moves away from the trinity, but also offers very little variability when it comes to birthing of sensitive (spiritual) beings. Genetics are modular. Understanding transcends barriers separating species. Concerning hybridization projects, other writings of mine have commonly revealed Zeta DNA is “used like Polyfilla” to hold genetic materials in position. Zeta stock is almost universally adopted in creation of those so dubbed “robot clones” (non-reproductive biological entities), with specific characteristics varying across different civilisations. However, an associated question (not answered thus far) has plagued my enquiry on these matters. Could Zeta [DNA] be God’s solution to natural flexibility requirements enabling proactive hybridisation? If Zeta DNA pliability was not merely accident of invention, then might the holy trinity be just one system available of many options? Does prescient spiritual order rigidly champion “what is” in deference to other options? Were this so, then supremacy would actually be a contextual way of divinity

Worth reiterating here, we know Zeta is a spiritual life design separate of and not directly connected to Anunaki genetics. Though there is some spectral convergence via Thoth lineages (including Mantid, Lemurian paths) which were results of an ancient purge of the Anunaki group, Zetas are fully independent (other than everything’s indirect exposure via direct relationship to source). Mantid is one of the few energy fields within this universe spectrum that survived [so-called] Big Bang (contextual cataclysmic purge of old existence) and, within cosmic circles, is known as “keeper of the knowledge”. Insight to ramifications radically changes evolutionary equations, demonstrating Anunaki formed a group synthesis from analogous sources at conception.  Such roots are explained by their history. Proceedings I shall briefly outline. In the previous universe incarnation, what had been today’s core Anunaki had no power. In this regard, they have been described as manifesting in the form of the worm or maybe something snakelike. Over time, their successive attempts to seize power had the effect of contaminating everything that had been “valued” by the collective “other”. So tumultuously did animosities build, relative energies destabalised “balance of things”. Because God is collective balance, holistic disharmony triggered an almighty reaction. Leveling of the old universe, history records the catastrophic event, which was a catastrophe beyond all catastrophes, as Big Bang. New natural order has been as much a reparation of old order as a rebuild of new order. Complimenting a deliberate reincarnation strategy, God decided to give Anunaki all the power, but widened the group as a merged collective to include “safeguarding energies” (such as the Mantid). Of course, old order has desperately tried to reestablish its old bad ways under guise of new power. Nevertheless, to fully shake off God’s legacy has naturally proven impossible, because the whole is never able to fully detach from extraneous relationships. Through Earth reptilian lineages, even karmic reseeding of “reviled” alpha draconians demonstrates how immaculate God is. Though local elements of that part of legacy may have been strongly responsible for discordance prior to Big Bang, all the more reason to contain malice within the original Anunaki model. Human has been instrumental in ensuring pathways to balanced [new] order.

Whilst adrift of divinity, in fact humanity has already begun plotting a legacy of its own. Phenomenon is crudely expressed as civilization, which currently celebrates “rightful” selfishness. Corresponding profiteers have sold their investors the “noble” idea that “lab” rats and a plethora of other creatures were instrumentally “bred” to save humanity. In truth, they are “bred” merely to theoretically advance experiments. Neither “breeding” nor experimentation accommodated the will of creatures involved, nor was any consideration given to the fact. Profiteers do what they do because they personally benefit from associated parasitism. Therefore, from the spiritual perspective, crimes are undeniably transparent. Alternatives, such as humans using themselves as lab rats for prosperity, are problematical for profiteers. Short of abduction, human lab rats would need excessive incentives to encourage volunteer. Equally possible, experiments on humans might prove sufficiently unpopular as to quash any prospect of their use. But presuming otherwise, associated lavish funding requirements would surely prohibit most activity from even beginning. Of course, was any idea of diligent “testing” to be scrapped, direct to market untested products would severely impact commercial value and profitability, notwithstanding popularity. There are no necessary evils. Therefore, from the wholly divine perspective, the entire concept of “lab animals” is invalid and not only because such efficacy defies natural order. Answers to all problems [to be encountered by mankind] are built into nature with attributed knowledge not attained (generically, at least) through animal testing. Genre problem of balance is equally catalytic. Changes compound effects on balance.  Simply by moving a feral creature to a foreign environment can have the impact of toppling existing systems that already comprise nature. For instinct on these matters to improve, human needs spiritual advancement, which is currently not happening fast enough. Indeed, because man is so undeveloped, cosmically it is almost as if he is still at pre-birth stages. Some may feel I am overstating tragedy, but, morally speaking, “innocent”, helpful lab rats are as grand a transgression as serial abortion. In other words, you would struggle to find a greater spiritual violation than what is happening right under our noses justified by “interests of humanity”.

Yet everything is fine, because we can blame the reptilians. Failing that we can blame the religions as we don’t deserve to think for ourselves. Okay, I was being facetious here, but it is vogue to conclude “spiritual ills” are the work of reptilian overlords or “the devil” and this is rather unfair. Humans would do well to focus on the plank in their own eye. This is not to say problems pertaining from how genetic hierarchies are striated and manipulated (deliberately or otherwise) don’t play a part in collective or individual transgression. How much does an unwanted child pollute the group equilibrium? When unwanted children reproduce themselves, does karmic accord somehow reset or does each unwanted child cause expanded spiritual schism? Was each unwanted child to regress spiritual potential of the human group well, then, perhaps birth termination is righteous. But such view equally rather pushes the onus back to individual propriety. All attempted procreation must desire positive birthing result while society doesn’t accept new life “is” evidence of divine rite of passage. If societies recognized any new child was “wanted” by someone, anyone, then deliverer becomes superfluous. Under such circumstances, though physical dynamics of binary family trinity remains, the “group” has spiritually evolved sufficiently to see beyond the individual “ownership”. Sincere adoption is a step towards collective responsibility. My Jesus effect accusation leveled at reptilians is not necessarily association that permeates bad will. Whilst I am concerned about polarization of “unquestionable” ideology, overall messaging from phenomenon is genuinely uplifting and progressively positive.

The idea of collective responsibility goes beyond reflecting on (or “finger pointing”) spiritual betrayal demonstrated by selfish behaviour of “the other”. Was the group to take moral precedence upholding reasoned, responsible wishes of lone individuals (which “had been” the premise of institutional government), then the idea of an effervescent “holistic” network that imbues archetypical human (such as “Jesus”) is already intrinsically prepared. Definitions emanating from a long list of characters over history, including Moses, have made effort to cast institutional “higher human”. Of course, adoption of lore is very much open to the mercy of interpretation of individuals; comprising lesser human designate. Not only that. Without concordant grass roots resonance, higher human risks diverging so far out of step with his followers, messaging (and associated authority) is viewed as toxic. Consequentially, morality has changed over the ages, but not just as a symptom of grass roots disillusionment and rebellion. Religious movements (which ultimately morphed into governments) gradually became more and more adept at distorting “good will” to fit political objective microcosms. The end result has been the crisis that poses as modern day ethics. The point I am trying to make here is, before we pick on corrupt Gods as provoking ills of mankind, perhaps we should look closer to home first. Hypocrisy of the current Gaza “war” is no better example. Israel has presumed right to mass slaughter (as righteous “chosen people”) by branding an entire population “terrorists”.

We know (from information I have been obliged to discuss many times) that Sirian ancestors were stripped of their extraordinary powers over successive devolutions. Current genus is unable to make war at all without unbearable karmic consequences. That is why reptilian proxies were used in the attempted and failed annihilation of “mischievous” grey skinned beings (according to Vedic texts announcing proclamations of God Perun) after they used Earth ice moon “Falah” (which means sky satellite in cosmic tongue) as refuge. Whereas Sirians were “technically” only indirectly involved, destruction of Bel was the karmic price paid, proving karma cannot be “outdone”. Such knowledge makes nonsense of Talmudic principle that stresses spiritual neutrality of Jewish culpability over wanton destruction of Gaza. Ultimately, collapse and subsequent end of mythical Atlantis was God’s answer to earlier impropriety of the Sirians. Modern day Jews may brag of their immunity and impunity, but I assure God will deliver the final answer. Religious scholars assure us that any legendary day of judgement is an individual reconciliation before God. Yet, immediately a spirit passes from the body, time ceases to exist and everything reverts to timeless realms. So, why would the day of judgement be an individual affair? Evidence suggests that all humans will be judged in union. Perhaps there will be more than one judgement. Perhaps these judgements happen periodically (from the linear perspective). What is certain is precipice will either ensure evolution or devolution. Specific spirits that have ingratiated themselves in spite of bad group circumstances would adopt different, more profitable life systems for future incarnations.

In accordance with divine perspective, were any lifeform sufficiently lacking in potency to cross a designated red line well, then offence would risk “flawed design” being wiped from existence altogether. God, we learnt from Big Bang, is reactionary, but only when provoked. In effect, the Big Bang purge precisely enacted mass erasures of spiritual identities. Big Bang demonstrated God could not be pushed a step too far. There is another consequence of karma, which enables Big Bang judgement. Partly because the “group” is far more potent than any individual, sufficiently spiritually advanced societies evolve as hive minds (Star Trek’s “borg” concept offers a negative though pertinent portrayal). Lack of visibility is lack of transparency. In light of political manipulation across our natural realms, any suggestion of eavesdropping would be met with shrieks of “dystopian” dismay but, in practicality, even reptilians use limited synthesisation of networked mind. Functionality, for them, is enabled by technology (Elon Musk’s brain chip a human attempt at implausible replication?) but network participants only need to be volunteers. Advantages are so well understood; I know of no cases of individuals rejecting opportunity to join vaunted groups. Indeed, it could be said the opposite is true. Such are perceived benefits; inclusion would be considered a social privilege with those missing out being literally “kept in the dark”. Perhaps a plausible analogy accommodates anyone rejecting the internet on grounds of security concerns. In practicality the “insecure” internet has become the key to information and those that doesn’t use it socially and intellectually devolve.

It is no accident that I continually reference the Jews and Israel throughout this essay. There are too many coincidences to deny the likelihood that a very small insular core associated with “Zionism” are privy to unpublished knowledge, preserved since the fall of Atlantis. For instance, few will know Sanskrit was conceived from the root of universal language. Never be confused by “relevance” of unrelated sprawl adopted as a preferred text for Indian Hindi or other dialects. From the time Sanskrit “without script” was recognized as a script, it had been long corrupted. Compelling arguments exist presenting Australian aboriginal “moon tongue” as an even purer version, but I digress. Here intrigue begins. Expanding on accounts from “The Andreasson Affair”, a Grey Being communicating through regressed abductee “Betty” explains his message to humanity (encapsulated in a little blue book) is [written in] “base 32”. I can read some of the words used taken from his paraphrased short announcement. These confirm the language is a version of cosmic script. Message details do not contribute to this analysis. For this analysis, the important point is base 32 is a crucial confirmation. Asci code comprises one such base 32 alphabet and, though there are those that claim computers and relevant code were “channeled” into existence by timely clairvoyants, I will not dwell on importance here either. Way back (in one of my first related articles) I revealed Hebrew script is cut down cosmic alphabet. Hebrew has twenty-two unadorned consonants, so why did ancient scholars add ten further consonants (emphasized when “pointing” was introduced) to created base 32 alphabet if they knew nothing about the cosmic legacy?

Main aims of this essay decode infrastructure preserving an existential network that literally “locks” humanity in place. Term “regression” made an entry when I introduced Raymond Fowler’s book. In twilight circles such forms of hypnosis are regarded to be infallible (when the subject offers transparent account). Yet the regression process is also a giant clue as to the composition and instrumentation of the network that “holds” human in position. Where did the expression “he’s sleeping” [referring to deceased] originate? As I age, I have noticed the “lucid” transition from sleeping to waking state extends more and more. Being optimistic, when I eventually manage to reach my eighties (cough cough), will I see spirits walking with me? Ancients were particularly concerned over dream state invasions. Thinking about this, perhaps mediums such as LSD or ayahuasca induce dream state as version of cognizant reality or fusion of dream state and cognizance. The idea that dream state is an eternal, continual process that, by design only allows us to tune in when we sleep resonates with me. If we were to assume such was fundamentally true, then death would simply represent the step of “casting off” to formally reunite with “renewed” cognizant eternity. Knowledge certainly switches traditional view as to role and potency of reality’s juxtaposition with dream state. Such considerations can but conclude dream state is reality, and reality, its shadow, a relatively incoherent nightmare.

My book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” notes that there are likely many more divisions than “conscious” and “subconscious” states. Death announces the peeling away of each layer. Whereas Pane Andov cogently argues layers prophetically amount to thirty-two divisions, instinct tells me true figures are lower in number. Perhaps the nine divisions classifying dimensional states relevantly impact considerations here, but I am prepared to concede potent densities are equally valid separators too. Even so, when factoring enablement by reproduction, physical life offers a form of eternity itself. By extension, reproduction (whether natural or synthetic) is the instrument used for genetic expansion. Therefore, if there was growth across all dimensions, this would mean that the Anunaki also need to reproduce. Motive behind reproduction would not necessarily parry with common needs of lower realms. Taking the idea of expansion literally, when a human body becomes bloated, this is not always the result of desired action or indeed even a mitigated strategy. Obesity might be an effect of hypertension, caused by extraneous factors. Other forms could well be result of applied gluttony. Taking comparison up to spiritual heights, arguably result of hubris from its own creation, Anunaki collectivization was a continuous evolution of energies; once residues of Big Bang. Could the “worm that turned” (from the prior universe incarnation) have sought solace by becoming something so big (too big to fail), legitimacy of its right to [absolute] power had to go undisputed in the new universe?

Did unchecked zeal towards awesome collectivization gathered elements that didn’t belong, weren’t natural? To answer this, and before I unpack historic legacy, logic persuades everything associated with our solar system must have been originally connected to the Anunaki. That includes Zetas, alpha draconians. Lyrans, Lumerians and all humanoid types. That includes every entity type, physical or metaphysical, ever recorded and many others that are not regularly known. Earth appears to be a conservation point of roots preserving numbers of past decipherable convergences and, if considerations are widened to add Tiamat histories, my existential “home” would extend to welcome considerable varieties of other types, whether that be species or spirits. For idiosyncrasies of these varied evolutions, we need to travel back to the beginning; to the very unfolding and rebuilding of reality and its many layers. Philosophy concerning immediate impact of Big Bang is where science opinion roughly matches practical occurrence. An instant after Big Bang, a mind boggling explosion of energy precipitated out into the “void”, energy that had collected and “compacted”, consequence of God’s violent reaction. Assessment of the void (the place where science opinion loses all practical coherence) decries any notion theoretical absence was “nothing”, because energy must “bind” with “something” to be. In effect, that “something” is potency. Energy needs potency to be. Indeed, without potency, nothing would exist. There would only be absence. Accordingly, where science determines there is “nothing”, reference is actually being made to pure potency.  Strangely though, there is a paradox, because from the unadulterated materialist perspective, potency equates to nothing. On the other hand, materialism is born from static illusion and, as such, largely denies elements and constants essential to building reality constructs.

Though Albert Einstein profoundly recognized gaping flaws in materialism, in light of his corporate indoctrination, daren’t offer any more than glimpses of affirmation. Einstein recognized, to his credit (and his horror), that materiality was etched from light, which is a series of pulse signals full of holes. Visible effects permit no straight lines. Tiny orbs of light (atoms) constituting illusory “reality” appear to be deliberately calibrated (such as mass) to append existence functionality. It is likely Einstein would have considered possibility for external powers (aided with sufficient tool chest) of being able to change calibration or even switch off atoms. He confirmed existence was static while generating the illusion of “solidity”. Unconsidered by Einstein, though Big Bang announced a time prior to activation of atoms, supporting infrastructure was present and this is what we call the void. The void, in one sense, is the bridge between real and eternal. Upon announcement of Big Bang only white light precipitated, which means at the very beginning of new existence, no frequencies were available to permeate material reality [as we experience it]. This startling inevitability forced a rewrite of my opinions as to the very nature of the Anunaki and even corresponding true “value” of spirituality. From the utopian perspective, if It was possible to distinctly separate good from evil, does either emotive branding limit or extend domain spirituality? Could God legitimately be branded evil per selfish human paradigm?

Regardless of which religious doctrine scrutinised, “God” has been essentially created by humans for humans, so any philosophy that represents actual will of God is coincidental. In this context, God is not comprehended and neither is potency of phoenix rebirth. To understand the rise of the phoenix, we must return to the time just before Big Bang. The old incarnation was violently collapsed in one giant sweep, an all-consuming wave which had the effect of compressing all the parts. Thus everything that “was” before had been condensed as a consolidation into one giant star. One giant star comprised the collective resource of everything that had existed prior. Because no (physical) record exists, it is unclear whether the immense energy ball collective was the original Satan (or Blessed) star, but I suspect not. Satan, in context, is the collective wisdom of God, so It was either original or a reincarnation. Whichever the case, one giant portal acted as funnel to reinvest all the energies that had been collected to permit a brave new universe. It is possible Gnostic legends referring to Sophia presented elements of truthfulness relative to Big Bang. Simple deduction concludes everything that was released into the new universe was made of white light, which constitutes seven heavenly states as exampled from Sophia’s legacy. At least part of that legacy must be what is now known as Anunaki. However, Anunaki were instrumental in the precipitation of a finite black universe (made from back light) and were also [by proxy] probably the agents behind the creation of what we experience as material existence. Such opinion is more than confirmed by Bek-ti’s “creation” account as reported by Robert Morning Sky in Terra papers.

Previous essays of mine did internally debate over the question of whether the Anunaki had “partial access” to heavenly domains. It is clear now they must have begun as complete frequencies that resonated heavenly state. We must consequentially prepare ourselves for uncomfortable truth, given menacing aspects of reputation legacy (illustrated by Zoroaster’s code of defiance). “Heaven” does not necessarily match picture postcard framing by most religions or Hollywood zealots who apparently represent most noble human ideals. So, if heaven does amount to purity, what are origins of elements that naturally evoke or provoke discord? Are these exclusively limited to black light domains? Annoyance, intolerance, sense of right, sometimes perhaps only bad vibes and a range of other subtler character definitions can lead to war. Wars are either reactive or culminating evolutions of character disillusionment (note how Israel has crossed the red line “in the global public eye” because of this). Without besmirched assorted character definitions, so-called “seven deadly sins” would hold no water. These include greed, gluttony, avarice, sloth, wrath and so on. But here’s the critical point. All bad behaviours (or so attributed) are immediately disarmed when they are tolerated. An obvious statement, maybe, but a vital one nonetheless. Why are certain actions or outcomes tolerated and other not? Critically, we humans take for granted how essentially important and game changing character traits are.

Gnostic folklore does seem to understand equations, heavenly states each defined as different character sets, including state of grace, state of majesty and so on. Yet, at one extreme, to be truly awesome is to be terrifying. It follows that heralding from white light domains does not necessarily denote feeble demeanour. Qualities of holiness and ferociousness have potential to overlap. All states, whether white or black, offer potential to be. That is all. Virtues (or perhaps “sins”) are how states affect being and are judged for affection or disaffection. Traditionally humility, charity, chastity (a fraud calculated from inner discipline), gratitude, temperance (another version of inner discipline), patience and diligence are touted as heavenly virtues. However, the unimaginable concentration of energies that collected as Anunaki after Big Bang included many other traits, some remaining uncategorised. These, such as balance within harmonic order, often go beyond human capacity to comprehend. There were also different varieties of resilience, which included the very desire to exist at all. Perhaps one of the reasons energies collected in the manner they did is they were forced together “by God” (as it were) and this would explain proclivity towards tragic splintering of the Anunaki. Though, I do concede that at the “moment of collectivization”, steps seemed right and appropriate for all parts of the acting equilibrium (which was God complete because everything had been compressed as a single star), they were destined to detach from each other to become individuals. Dichotomy maybe, but this rather stresses the essential nature of cultures.

Fatal differences in character became apparent, only over duration. Collectivisation originally happened because circumstances had ensured necessity. Over duration, new circumstances, outcome of experience, decreed compartmentalization. However, fragmentation was not merely the result of different departments exercising the right of self-determination. Hallowed “group” also made successive purges. Elements that were purged were no longer considered suitably worthy kith or kin. Disenfranchised parts were deemed “related” to the group, whereas outright rejections were not. Of course, this immediately highlights two obvious schisms. It is impossible to disown what you were. Any change to the group (no matter how infinitesimal) would alter balance of things (that were), perhaps radically. I have identified seven divisions (seven rays?) of the Anunaki, each one changing character and ambitious articulation of the whole. If the original collection had been ordained by God (by forcing elements together), could fragmentation potentially precede disaster? Perhaps equally importantly, how would that implicate descendent ranks, such as human? Without doubt, Zoroaster’s reaction to “a pariah force” (antipathy of balance) more than indicates that God’s plan had already fallen asunder by then.

I have written extensively about an oppressive “supremacist” streak running down the reptilian lineages (via alpha draconian genetic pathways). Could Zoroaster’s reflections on ephemeral entrapment have been related? Ironically, no. The Anunaki had shed the energy responsible for alpha draconian lineages long before Zoroaster existed, so the cause must have been consequence of something else. Resilience equations (mentioned earlier) do come with a negative side. Did the Anunaki presume an absolute right to interfere with their “own body” (noting, lower spiritual hierarchies are ultimately a direct correlation of Anunaki will). Extended arguments could be applied to our own spiritual ownership of our own physical bodies. In this regard, wise warning, “the body is the temple” deserves heeding. Following debate perhaps provides a better, more rigid forum for discussion. Does a human mother “own” the will of her child in spite of the relationship having been ordained by God as means to expand scope of life systems? Prophet Zoroaster’s umbrage was an extension of that argument and judgmental reflection on what constitutes divine purpose. Correspondingly, according to the prophet, Anunaki had overstepped the mark on role and rite. Putting protection requirements to one side, equating comparable divine perspective against mothers’ rights, parental responsibility must not interfere with natural sibling rite of passage.

Divisions (that are not synthetic) constructed within open source reality can only be distinctly defined by those with knowledge of them is another observation which often goes overlooked. Those without knowledge can be manipulated, are prone to baseless judgement. True knowledge is inherent but this may be defined by capability to learn. Because purposeful enlightenment can only be attained, reality cannot be fabricated to control outcomes at any level of spiritual identity. Conversely when fantasy coordinates false reality, spiritual identity is forsaken or lost. Therefore, scrupulous journeyers are compelled to follow the clean path. Divisions in spiritual grades are marked by differing subjective reality paradigms. So it goes without saying, for a higher order to directly intervene in affairs of a lower one, occurrence would risk contamination of enlightenment. Enlightenment, it must be stressed again, can only be attained. Suffice to say, humanity (the group) may be considered as the Anunaki “lower body”, but (according to divine order), forces of inertia must rely on natural spiritual direction of this calculus for the body to be “at one” with the spirit. Neither body can interfere with spirit nor spirit interfere with body, beyond progressive, influential measures. Direction is achieved through attainment.

So it follows the Anunaki are able to indirectly compel human passage, learning process facilitated through “signs”. Because, relative to each other, realities are fundamentally striated, it is only possible for direct connection between fields within immediate proximity of different bandwidths. Likewise, standard human waking state is too far adrift to make tangible connection with Ba’al. However, by adopting altered state, ancients were reputedly able to make cordial interactions of sorts. This seems to suggests activation of [otherwise latent] parts of our gene spectrum might prepare capability to liaise all the way up to the Anunaki. By transcending into timelessness, I can personally connect with the essence of Anunaki and beyond. No direct “one on one” communication could ever happen in this body, but I am able to gauge a sense of what they are in terms of “state of being”. That feeling is a combination of peace and expectation, but there is something else, which I initially assessed as pride. To be more precise, pride is (in effect) an emotional vent or opinion. The feeling I felt went beyond opinion. It felt as though they knew they had a right to be what they were and they celebrated this right. Perhaps “ordainment” is the word I am scrambling for. Deep down, every human questions his or her divine status, regardless of pride or bluster. Anunaki do not. Anunaki are resolute as to what they are.

Before returning to background behind historic Anunaki reformations, the tenuous nature of primary conception is worth evaluating further. Descartes’ premise “I think; therefore, I am” has some application here. For philosophy to be true, essence of awareness’ very being relies on cognizance [to be]. In my infant years, when I was unaware of self, I still existed. I grew and was unaware of the fact, until I became aware of the fact, when my cognizance came into being, miraculously. As an immense, immerging being, Anunaki (the union) went through its own infant stage; where the parts were unaware of the whole. It was at this vital stage of development that the part now labelled “Thoth” became detached from the whole. Thoth appears to have joined an external “alien” group of energy fields, which include Zeta grey being and Mantid heritage. One of the significant reasons that the Anunaki group was not “born” cognizant is the parts were not networked to a hive mind. As far as I know, they became aware of each other but each had independent thought. Of course, identities harmonizing via hive mind remove opportunity or need for independent thought, though thought at its root is consistently “independent”. Main advantage of hive mind is disillusion of dispute, which precipitates balance; ultimate objective of divinity. So how this relates to the Anunaki? Well, as all subset hierarchies are naturally independent, they are less inclined towards divine spirituality than the other. Even so, as identified earlier in this essay, the “Draco” at least have created cut down versions of hive mind, aided by technology. As such, they gradually edge towards utopia.

It seems plausible that the later infamous split dividing Sirian ancestry from Anunaki whole is another consequence impacted by ability to be cognitive. Ultimate quest for identity, at its most fundamental, is to see and approve of one’s own image. Concurrent with self-reflection, the Anunaki clearly reached schism point which proposed an untenable split in identity. To presume dispute merely encapsulated “face of God” preferences would be foolhardy, but I do interpret “discontentment of personal image” metaphor as effect of radically different “outlooks” on reality. Anunaki body separated from Sirian part had had different approaches and beliefs as to what was meant by purpose and ordination. Original state was cooperation without compatibility. Absolute right to authority (within confirmable parameters of existence) was the singular real commonality. Destiny has shown the Anunaki to have been much more obliging with external factors that qualify parameters of existence. Moving to a modern day analogy, though each is external of the other, Israelites and Palestinians are arguably “one people” bound by the land of Palestine. One people have had an identity crisis that compromises the land of Palestine. History has shown us Sirian ancestors’ uncompromising arrogance fated numerous fatal cataclysms and successive evolutionary downgrades. Does prophecy await Israel? Is prophecy being fulfilled against Palestinians? Sirian stubborn streak and antipathy towards compromise overwhelmingly contributed to partitioning of the Anunaki. Partitioning of Palestine “created” Israel, by similar circumstances.

Unless (to all intents and purposes) they had felt estranged parts of the group had always belonged, the Anunaki whole would not have created a surrogacy experiment with Sirians. Of course, on many other occasions I have exampled how disastrous the experiment turned out to be, proving, once and for all, that there had been irreconcilable differences all along. But perceptions championed solidarity, prior to wisdom being so sorely tested out in the field. At least the split was “mutual”, which cannot be said for all hierarchy “shedding”. Alpha draconian lineages (including Lyrans, blue avians and Earth reptilians) have been discussed, but they were one of the three separate evictions perpetuated after the Sirian catalyst had been put into motion. Different to “amicable” mutual resolve that decreed the Anunaki’s first reviewed partition, following estrangements were result of fundamental ejections by the whole. Subsequent to dispute, Alpha draconian lineages go “unrecognized” by the Anunaki. Other splits (I have not been given specific details on) though ostracized, are not outlawed. Reasons for this seem pertinent enough. In my very last essay I discussed negative Lyran attributes (in particular), which include the ability to distort truth and manipulate, and this possibly was weighed into considerations by the wider group.

I have yet to reveal details on two of the Anunaki shedding events. In fact, one still remains formally unidentified to me (for now). So, I would like to discuss characteristics of the remaining one that has not been evaluated thus far. Such evidence deserves highlight as genetic resources appear to have been responsible for Pleiadian lineages. Considering that [confessed] “star seeds” most commonly reference Pleiadian as the most human-like “alien”, some may be surprised at differences. Essence of the missing part of Anunaki best fits the profile of a new type of grand reptilian, but quite unlike supremacist alpha draconians. “Stoic” is the best word I can find to conjure an affectionate profile of group character. They know what they want, applying those wants to design seamless reality results. Precision of coordination or timing somewhat explains Pleiadian ability to literally construct “harmony”, although Lyrans are named so because of their understanding of the harmonics of creation. Pleiadian spiritual seniors comprehend how frequencies hold everything together in coordinated situation. When you attempt to create a cultural paradise, the temptation is to cheat. Nature is not even. Also God can only be directly experienced via idiosyncrasies of nature or corresponding energies that permit nature. To construct a paradise synthesis, corners must be cut. Because of this, perhaps the Anunaki group saw the Pleiadian inherited gift as a kind of corruption. In fairness to such opinion, Pleiadians do traditionally apply a positive form of distortion to reality paradigms. There are some exceptions to this rule. In capacity as teachers of Atlantis, they rigidly upheld Sirian spiritual principles, along a flexible “rite of passage” (or learning through discovery) format, although may have used some of their special techniques to improve illumination processes.

Sirians, of course, go beyond principle and are renowned for truthful zeal. They were pitched against dragons (immoratised by St George and the dragon) in conquest over Earth. Dragons are passionate. Sirians are not, but they each have strange similarities in outlook. Expression “not to suffer fools lightly” springs to mind as a good reflection of dragon character. Compatible similarities with Sirian can be witnessed particularly by shared robust frankness of communications. Such undeniable commonality beggars’ mystery as to why a giant war over Earth ever began. I suppose those with principled character have a high degree of stubbornness and this probably was the main inspiration behind attrition. Dragons, lest we forget, are (or were) the highest “mortal” version of the Anunaki. Elementary deduction proposes their core traits must be a relevant indicator as to overall Anunaki demeanour. Indeed, I would go further to deduce that Sirians were bestowed with additional concentrations of qualities aligned to honesty and truthfulness. They were so “zealous” the group actually found them overwhelming. Was this because they were predominantly tuned to white light frequencies, whereas remainders were diluted by black light? If concentrations of black light [that had merged with white light] were fairly expansive, imbalance would go some way to explaining differences leading to the various group splitting events. It is ironical that Sirian lineages have subsequently been dragged down to black light realms because of successive cosmic impropriety. Their valiant return to white light is embroiled in the “Israel” Tradition (truth suppressed by ancestral Hebrews).

Pressing on, other information has been presented to me over the course of this investigation. According to my unannounced sources, there have been several insignificant shedding events, perhaps dozens, but the most major Anunaki split next to creation of Sirian ancestral identity is remembered simply as “RRR”. Original event happened billions of years ago, though much later energies morphed into what became cornerstone of mammalian designs. Dragons have some of this DNA in their own spectrum, delivering qualities contributing to their ferociousness. Whilst associated facts may seem far-fetched, given “scientific profiling”, Earth dinosaur tyrannosaurus rex could notably (and without any provocation) instantly transform its usual placid temperament into a furious rage dredged up from the opposite end of the spectrum. Also usually placid in character, the same could be said for dragons. I feel traits must herald from hereditary RRR presence. Contrary to corporate paleontological opinion, might all dinosaurs have played role as precursor to spontaneous introduction of Earth surface mammals? It is important to qualify, because root DNA is embedded in light, with amino acid strings only detailing “effects” of genetic composition. Genetic and quantum sciences are very limited in their vision, their corresponding audiences even more limited in understanding of the way things are. Until the atomic layer is thoroughly comprehended, geneticists will continue to operate largely in the dark.

Abductee Sixto Paz Wells has divulged his strange encounters with Ganymede based Lemurians at length. Ganymede is one of Jupiter’s moons. According to these Lemurian accounts (presuming accuracy of Wells’ annotation), Lucifer (meaning angel, bringer of light from beyond reality) himself a “sound being” (I quote) was the archangel who (with input from others) designed what became the draft plan for life system ordinations on Earth. Though the plan was not conceived thus, “survival of the fittest” is one interpretation that has inspired commercialization of interests by heretic industrialists. Purest interpretation of Lucifer’s model approximates a warrior code. As such, species are either given “attack” or “defense” virtues for survival, asset pitched below a system that was designed to be the most effective method of recycling life. Kills would always be eaten, which had not happened prior to introduction of this system. Commitment to expanding attack or defense capabilities was designed to consume life purpose. Those that didn’t want to fight could make their way and coexist on protected (hallowed) ground. That said, it was felt rugged character of the mammal in particular would compel resilience in face of all odds and this has largely proven true. Territorial abandonments are so rare; they are almost unheard of. Pastoral animals are prepared to risk life and limb to migrate, because that is the tradition (instinct) and tradition is in the blood.

Reasoning behind adaptation of Lucifer’s model deserves some background. When they were able to go to war, Sirian ancestors demonstrated formidable aggression in times of dispute. It is likely this was contributed to by the RRR component of their DNA. Aggression reached such heights, entire populations were stripped from existence, true genocides (unlike phony “brandings” used to politically advantage certain human ethnicities). Devastation to life systems was deemed dysfunctionality by Lucifer and other overseers. So to make slaughter “purposeful”, updated design of living things introduced different types of meat eaters to accommodate cleanup of the variety of expiring life systems. Interestingly, remaining SSS (what the Anunaki group was reduced to) heritage is unlikely to be as ferocious as anything on Earth, because they no longer possess the RRR streak. Dragons and Sirians, bridges to all lower living systems on Earth do have ferocity in their DNA spectrum. This means descended (combined dragon and Sirian) reptilian lineages are equally capable of behaving ferociously. Zeta stock does not share this quality. Because of the nature of human DNA, corresponding “hidden” Zeta assets are noted for their non-violent behaviour and pacifist stance. Splintering of the bulk genome has been the cause of proliferations that divide humanity into sub-groups of almost incompatible character types. This is not just because human comprises many different hybrid paths. Diversity is also caused by spirituality at the root.

Cosmic expression “ta” has been widely referenced throughout my website because it represents the boundary that separates divinity from existence, effectively segregating inner God “An” from outer God “El/Al”. “Ti” (of Nefertiti, for instance) represents physical “ordained” boundaries, perhaps used to define collective cultures. Though territories and their names have become purely symbolic, at one time where you had been placed (at birth) was your chosen destiny. Each birth deliberately added to a culture of particular flavour to suit your life path (connecting will all karmic tributaries). In outlining my case for a spiritual network commissioning the interests of “Gods”, I discussed potential for human reproduction to have been innocently compromised. If certain lands were divinely ordained to aid particular life paths, could this tie in with reproduction? Are particular peoples given attributes to provide more resilience or greater inclination towards resolute (and potentially) ferocious outbursts, more warlike in general? Ansarullah (Houthis) of Yemen have been described as some of the most natural warriors on this planet. Without financial or commercial benefit, they alone have spearheaded a front against Israel for continuing Gaza “genocide”. Ignorant pundits focus on a red sea commercial catastrophe, delirious to associated divine messaging. Particular strait that has been blockaded subliminally announces Babel (in the correct pronunciation). And so Bab El (Al)-Mandeb preserves Sirian presence on Earth? Perhaps “coincidence” was courtesy of Valiant Thor, who presides over a hidden facility. Even I could only guess where that is. Perhaps happenings are engrained in the way things are but, what is undeniable, what is certain is human is not alone.

From this perspective, we can go so far as to observe purpose of society is dual functional. Any sphere primarily exists to provide resources for developmental rite of passage. Ancients did warn against contamination of genetic strata from what amounts to “cross breeding”. Warnings were not heeded and outcomes have drastically interfered with natural design of ordinated life paths. Birth, ultimately, is a life force decision. Life force, not physical, drives an appraisal of spiritual intent. When ground map fails to follow divine ordinance, life force is thrown into confusion. Consequences are straightforward. What happens to those that are born into families of the wrong blend of compatibilities living in cultures offering comparatively alien values? Such situations prepare disaster. Unless societies are to provide sanctuary, transcending memorial birth or reproductive rite is forlorn. From such perspective, it looks as though ascendant prospects of man were rendered helpless long ago. Globalism and other industrial cults are the consequence. Man is becoming more and more bereft of spirituality as the bones of a much more powerful unseen network are gradually being revealed. Are those prophecies touting a greater-than-life “ascension” on collision course with that which is hidden in plain sight?

The Truth about Human Destiny and its Infiltration

It has been over a year since I last published an article and those around me; the dying carcass of a once thriving fan base have begun to lose patience. So, in tribute to the few that have persisted, stuck by me, who care enough about evidence I reveal, I have decided it is high time to put pen to paper again. That said, perhaps I should explain reasons for my extended absence. Back on the 6^{th of} January last year, anniversary of the first (possibly) real American revolution (Pelosi clearly didn’t wise up), my kidneys failed on schedule and before me unravelled a posthumous emergency. I say “on schedule” because everything was in place. Police were summoned and I was rushed to emergency ward apparently “more dead than alive”. Clearly no Messiah, it took six days for me to wake up from coma state. When that eventually did happen, I recall facing a large, inexplicable cartoon duck. And over a further six weeks of intensive hospital nursing, I was provided ample time to reflect over life and things in general.

It seemed to me I had been given a “second chance”; an uncommon cosmic oversight. Indeed, from the cosmic perspective, reasons for my life interruption were far from transparent. Compellingly, while grounded, various doctors kept on reiterating that my kidneys had been “blocked”, though others assured the “only option” forward was going to be permanent dialysis. Fate decreed I neither needed persistent dialysis nor any other debilitating hindrances. What is certain is my life had become congested beyond repair and that is predominantly why the cosmos enforced a chain of events that could have easily resulted in my death. Like others in the spiritual wilderness, I have supposed guides, but I prefer to refer to them using dryer terminology so, impulses that feed me information claimed “real reasons” behind my near death had been to induce rapid body weight loss. On current schedule (back then) I was on course for a fatal heart attack. Imagine if I had taken that damned vaccine. The same voices understandably also told me to “accept death before vaccination”. Courtesy of my extended hospital stay (provoked by a short period when I lost all appetite), overall body mass did eventually drop by twenty-five per cent. Suffice to say, when I eventually left care, I had to invest in a whole new wardrobe of clothes, which was overdue anyway, as I hadn’t even purchased a shirt for years.

But that is not all that happened. Naturally, I began profoundly reflecting over my near-death experience and subsequent relative recovery. Unknown quantities buried deep within me welled up and vowed I should return to journalism. This time it would be with renewed, refreshed perspective, dare I say relevance? My body may have shrunk from resulting experiences, but corresponding spirituality had grown disproportionately. While in hospital, I surely began to see the light. It was as though my last decade had merely been preparation for the enduring future; a catalyst that would spark a new career of sorts. There was something odd about some of the doctors, orderlies, nurses that had been around me. Such affairs had presented an eerie “familiarity” which, at first (in my dazed state), I couldn’t quantify. Yet, when I finally came to, realisation did strike. My hospital was Draco heartland. This is not to say the doctors, orderlies and nurses weren’t ordinary people. They looked and behaved the same as everyone else. But “all together”, I could see who they were and why they were together. Perplexingly, I wonder whether any of them realised this? Let’s face it, the “system” teaches us to live our lives irresponsibly; upon the assumption (to preserve fickle “survival”) there are no designated victims or saviours. Truth, though, demands martyrs save the fallen. Our world is primarily divided between the responsible and irresponsible. Those who fail to respond are faithless, absent of principled beliefs. These candles blow all directions in the wind. Responsible can be divided between martyrs (leaders) or fallen (led).

Worlds apart from Draco responsibility, the hypocrites try to “cast” everything as uniformly irresponsible below make-believe survival. By this standard we are liberally clefted between winners and losers, whereas spiritually ascended know such tyranny cannot be so. Divisions may well be synthetic, but the overall concept can’t help reminding me of sheep in pens. Is that why the ancient rulers assumed roles as Priest Kings (shepherds)? Considering our synthetic herding (and given the enormous incubation period), might analysis go some way to verify an all-consuming, convoluted spiritual control conspiracy, engineered by forces formally clearly not of this Earth? My essay aims both to outline and prove it is so, but first we must begin at the beginning to allow depth of perception to acknowledge and reflect. Perhaps the most important associated question is, where and how far back does this start? Was Middle Ages pious custom of self-flagellation a definite response to tyranny? The role of “addictions” providing cause for external forces to manipulate and corrupt should be carefully considered by all those determined to learn the truth. Whilst I refer to a psychological dependence here, effects can be just as destructive as with subjects rendered impotent by physical disability.

Regular visitors to this blog have witnessed a weighty catalogue gradually unravel. Attributed evolution has captured a unique appreciation of reptilian character, which is possibly the only resource of its kind and, as such, attempts to supply their perspective on life matters and everything. Yet, it is not possible for anyone to know “everything” at the commencement of a journey. We all must grow and become more experienced while we travel with life. We must make casual errors, caring enough to correct them. My case is no exception. What I “believed” at the beginning has radically changed and learning will continue to incrementally develop as the journey progresses. Core facts may well provide sturdy templates, but truth can be negotiated to fit all perspectives. Of course, because experience is remembered as a combination of data (what was witnessed) and consensus view (pool reflection), “proof” is inadequate. Proof (by conventional auspices) might equate to fiction. Reptilians, my regular visitors will clarify, are predominantly also fiction to a world obsessively driven by unchallenged material standards, for they mostly exist in the ethereal shadow regions. Ones (as I) with ability to tune into these “resources” know too well reptilians are as real as day. I am going to come right out and say it. Because of overzealousness towards anti-spirituality (materialism), many human societies have been left disconnected and confused.

In their own world reptilians do have very specific, identifiable forms. Traits trickle down to the human genome, but only those that know what they are looking for can see distinctions. The remainder realise nothing. On this subject, they are empty vessels. It is though they have been “voided” by some external force. Higher entities, such as certain dragon clans, have reached exalted morph being status. This means they can present themselves in any form but, invariably, stick to “preferred” gene paths. The classical serpent, the catfish, the fox are a few of the choice designs we identify with. Contrary to popular tradition, dragons can be extraordinarily placid, but when they turn….watch out! General lack of comprehension surrounding genetic statuses extends to reptilian libido as well. Echoes of their character embedded in human only lightly affects the exterior, so, overall, in terms of posthumous morphing, I’m afraid never the twain will meet. Popular, scandalous notions of doppelganger humans (such as Mrs Clinton) are an anathema. From vague compatibilities emanating from the very different gene brackets, vicious self-centred journalists have invariably drawn pitifully poor, manipulative conclusions. Even so, whilst reptilians do have their own code of conduct, duty of care and respect for the human body are sufficiently obsolete to draw criticism.

Humans have (to some degree) become transformed into an innocent food source. Just as we love to soak up a good ball game, they crave specific energy frequencies generated through consequences of the “human group” simply being vital. To generate sufficient energy for “feeding” requires many compatible people. The type and style of energy desired might best be described as positive or negative tension, but I will discuss the phenomenon in more detail as this essay progresses. Comparatively, we love a good suspense thriller or horror movie, so any human can vaguely appreciate what reptilians experience. The significant difference is, to them, energy is a sort of food (or juice). In that regard, we provide succour to innocently accord symbiotic balance. They need heathy, plausibly ignorant, bloated human populations to maintain a constant easily accessible supply. This means, in effect, that conspiracies suggesting reptilian involvement in wholescale human depopulation are wrong. Reptilians would want very congested large population blocks, so the idea of us being herded into mega-cities fits that agenda like a glove.

Another way of looking at this is, without us in bulk and submissive, reptilians have no food source and that might mean they would have to take measures to re-establish a supply. But first there is a basic misnomer which needs to be exploded. “Reptilian” has become a term often used with sleight of hand. As such, my usage here parrots a misleading tradition. To illuminate, Biblical Genesis clearly states “woman” (human) became “afraid of the serpent” after God had “forced it to slither on its belly”. Information tells the perceptive reader that, prior to God’s ultimatum, reptilians neither behaved as snakes do today nor were of an aligned vicious character. We can further presuppose, they were (generally) loved by woman (human) before the ultimatum. Per such visualisation, reptilians may look obsidian but have distinct alien origins. Any suspicions are confirmed when full comprehension of genetic history is gleaned. I have written at length about their creation, which was managed by extra-terrestrial Lyrans. Under strict instructions from dragon “owners” of the anchor DNA pool, Lyrans were granted license to infuse their own gene stocks in order to refine the finished product; a liberty that angered prescient Anunaki (who interpreted interference as a form of infection or corruption). Suffice to say, wider politics established we were the scourge, or blemish, down a convoluted DNA pathway (ultimately) property of the Anunaki and I (in particular) wonder what resulting action will be taken by them when our genetics are formally transformed within their ascended range.

Current changes in our sun’s cycle do more than hint that the Anunaki are finally waking up. If true, momentum might align with our looming upgraded perception. Perhaps the sun will appear the same “as it was”, but new irregular cyclic activity will reflect any upgraded perception across the board for the human group. Occurrence would undoubtedly vilify nostalgic belief in a spiritual ascension of man. On that front, whereas there is no concrete evidence to support the notion humanity has intrinsically “woken up”, attitudes have drastically changed over the last twenty years or more. We truly do appear to be heading (or is that dragged along?) towards a virgin indigo age at a rapid rate of acceleration. However, the underlying conditions sponsoring jealousy, narcissism and other selfish behaviours are very much alive and well. Deadly sins thrive. Thus, I see no potential for any real revolt because surreptitious slaves have designated themselves as eternally willing properties of authorities more than ever (considering fewer and fewer are able to genuinely plead abject ignorance). Everyone is tied to government with view to milking (or blood sucking) its value-added resources. They pay taxes not as posthumous martyrs championing causes, but as broken, sapped-out frauds. All are consumed by the banking system and its fictitious “money” (the great fabrication). Probably and most importantly, everyone leads their lives as authorities dictate. Even the so-labelled “rebels” follow a script. In short, the entire world has been bought and sold by commerce and no one, not a soul, cares enough to do anything about it. All our “saviours” turn out to be “in it for the money” (political) by some means.

Scrutinising the detail of the sheer insanity we glibly call reality; I have personally been questioning which “who” might authorise the script? Yes, I have heard those silly arguments about masonic conspiracies, a shadow government labouring an Illuminati hidden code to precipitate New World Order. My goodness if it was that easy, everything could be predicted and I can go home, pack up my troubles and lie on the beach, like all those other aimless, sexually frustrated morons. Without question Rothschild, Rockefeller and other senior merchant families have sewn the world up commercially. That is beyond doubt. “Normal” royalty perished following the abolition of Assent in 1708 to jump start “new normal” forgery, non-royalty. Newton’s gold standard failed in 1796 because it could never possibly have succeeded, and this highlights the entrenched flaw invalidating legal tender. Money simply doesn’t suffice; it does not oil political affairs sufficiently and that is why just about every nation on the planet has been gradually plunged into synthetic bankruptcy (an issue enflamed by elitist greed and manipulation). Anyone competent enough to inspect evidence learns Illuminati New World Order policies are extremely visible, and therefore no conspiracy. Rockefeller’s memoirs made no secret of his purpose or ambitions. They were confronting. Well before the collapse of the German Reich (leading to hyperinflation 1921-22, consequence of sucking out the financial backbone of the economy), British pound sterling barely remained viable due to deliberate oversight.

Long before Newton determined to make his mark on the Earth, directly after the Romans introduced coinage to Britain, an epidemic followed. Society’s enterprising crooks of the time craftily clipped coin edges to cultivate hearty booties of scrap silver and gold. In fact, it wasn’t until the introduction of milled edge coins in the 1600’s that that deceitful practice stopped. People instinctively bite off more than they can chew, no matter who they are. People are corrupt in different ways. We each have our own peculiar peccadillos. These peccadillos stem from natural inconsistencies in our spiritual make up; a defect routinely exploited by ones that are neither of this Earth nor impacted by woeful human sense of mortality. When you ponder the consideration, are not humans instinctively vain, even when we are determined to “help” or support others? When we provide resources to those in need, either the act of charity makes us “feel good” or we had stuff that was about to go to waste. In a sense, even when we help others, we help selfishly. Consequently, unconditional love (that most cherished of human qualities) is oh so rare. Most acts of benevolence come “with strings”. The other side of the equation (demonstrating covert selfishness) is less subtle. We have several words dedicated to capture indulgence, but I feel it necessary to focus on one in particular so as to assure my point is definitely understood.

Among the most powerful in the English language is the word “addiction”, though reasoning behind the truth may not have been considered. From the scientific perspective, dependence is such a potent draw card, a body will feign symptoms of illness to win sympathy from mind. Here psychologists rightly debate over cause and effect. Was it the body or the mind that caused the schism? Symptoms give no insight; other than they are there and will persist, if left untreated. Thus, could incredibly prodigal entity types with erstwhile supernatural abilities; engineering skills and ingenuity enough to isolate and configure the root of selfishness, cultivate impulses that lead to addictions? Are additions limited to those habits we “know” or are there others we haven’t even considered? These are deep questions, but ones also very pertinent to this essay’s mission. Yet, there is an associated line of enquiry, a question that should be of even greater concern. What bizarre, futuristic infrastructure or methods might permit the cunning takeover of “confidence” that I propose? Let us be clear, “con men” is the shorthand group version of malicious individuals whose whole aim is to delude confidence from the gullible. Some of these fraudsters are exceptionally talented. Their fabrication of “evidence” supporting elevated fantasy is near perfect, apparently flawless (to those hoodwinked). However, when referencing my prior highlighted “prodigal entities” (per that evaluation), another layer of intrigue confuses considerations.

We must vigilantly cease to forget; some actually do not believe these figments exist. Perish the thought, but it is true, so we should explore the materialistic perspective. It would be fair to say, from that perspective, many otherwise concrete truths might seem as alien as the colour spectrum is to sight blind. Forgive them, for they know not what they do, but would they not be wise to challenge belief that the extent of existential experience is confined to material frequencies? Even empirical sciences are rather more cautious here. Technicians know existence is far greater, far more powerful than material “reality”. They simply can’t “prove” it, but what is proof anyway? It should be clear to everyone, those that can tune into things that go bump in the night are blessed with higher-than-average spiritual activation. Remainders (the “blind”) are literally left in the dark. Ones with inability to see would be far wiser to take advantage of liberal angels’ blessings than cursing them. By comparison, phenomenon is perhaps best witnessed by peoples’ televised reactions to an open concert the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra gave of Barber’s adagio for strings back in 2019. Whilst everyone was clearly impressed by the serene location, some were noticeably perplexed as to why they were there.

Transcendent from spectacle, did they hear but a dirge, a cacophony of causality? Blessing therefore is a dual edged sword, because many with the gift of vision are wrongly challenged by forces of ignorance. These saviours see the tonality of discordance. On the other hand, just as with certain forlorn attendees at that sombre concert, spiritual awakening does not necessarily mean ones that have not been activated are unable to suffer the effects of divinity in motion. Conversely, when it comes to belief for beliefs’ sake people have been shown capable of the impossible time after time again. And of course, this adds to the deviousness. What if external entities could exploit the human power of belief? Was that to happen, to the informed third-party ombudsman, it would be as though majorities were completely sightless, but refused to acknowledge warnings from the visually in tune. They knew better. How else to manipulate someone’s confidence other than harnessing addictive behaviour? Few have considered “will” and corresponding thought streams are the cause of addictive behaviour. Bodies respectively follow orders.

Arrogant “corporate” science euphorically lords over “our” progress when, in truth, that path is almost completely out of step with reality. Yes, we see material symptoms fairly well but, when it comes to interpretation, we are hopelessly inept. Detail and associated keystrokes are ever present in light and other frequencies, yet still require sufficient vision to be quantified. Because (from that deep perspective) we “know” nothing, why aliens are classed as alien should hardly surprise. But, of course, some of us (the intuits) at the very least suspect something is there in the places we are told there is nothing. Evaluating this domain, we encounter strange experiences that are sometimes hard to define at all, per standard worldview. We see things that quite literally aren’t there and that must be because our indoctrinated scientists fail to recognise the true scope of “reality”.

Nevertheless, there exists a shadow community of academics that have pioneered free thought their enemies love to belittle as “pseudo-sciences”. These tireless evangelists are desperately trying to make sense of the non-sensical fabrication wholesale Medias deliver as “truth”. Dedication to presence and function of the human’s energy field (kundalini) is part of this vital work. Debate over whether so-called “ghosts” might be evidence of standalone kundalini and other deep, unanswered imponderables are very much in the spotlight. If ghosts do not represent fallen bodies, could they be evidence of something that can be experienced but doesn’t exist? Sifting through innumerable accounts of the “unexplained” or aliens, I find but two unwavering commonalities. Respondent witnesses argue what they saw doesn’t exist (per common view of reality), yet equally seems very real. When in their presence, erstwhile unquestioned laws of reality spontaneously evaporate, such as solid walls that can be “walked through”, waterfalls that rise “with nothing to propel them” instead of falling as they are meant to, machines that “fit” into spaces a tenth of their apparent physical size and many other oddities.

From my own experience, I can substantiate symptoms have been comparatively subtle and easy to overlook. On one recent occasion, I “scolded” my hand while emptying contents of a pan of boiling water. Inexplicably, I felt no heat at all. Nor did any mark or residue appear afterwards to confirm the event. It was literally as if it hadn’t happened. But I knew it had, because I was there. Doubtlessly many other instances could be cited, but I think comprehension of what’s going on is plainly clear. Reality is routinely “arbitrated” by unknown spiritual means or agencies. In my case, the “scolding” was a form of profound baptism. Though interference more regularly occurs at critical times such as a “would be” death, other injunctions appear to be tactical. Power of karma obviously has far more intrigue than most might feel comfortable in contemplating. In fact, speaking honestly, most are dragged along by superstitions dressed as dedication to spirituality. Per the cosmic perspective, average human lifespan barely equates to a second of time which suggests reality is structured below something infinitely more wide ranging. If I was to boil down our existence to its bare bones, I would say we are here to test our capacity for relationships. We are dependent on relationships to survive so, in that respect, who or whatever designed the canopy called “existence” was an undeniable genius.

Sanity demands we all take notice of consequences as we are literally “all in this together”. Yet, sadly, the eternal trend is to manipulate togetherness in interests of self, and that quality must change if humanity is destined for an angelic “ascension”. Signs point to an ever-present, effervescent scheme directing our evolution, though, currently, “progress” is ultimately limited to strict agendas of non-humans who believe they understand our nuances well enough to construct obliging illusions. Whilst these agendas are quite complex, details as to how they are appended can be confined to three distinct groups. Before analysis can begin, we must acknowledge that what we are trying to come to terms with does not share values or morality per common human worldview. Before them, we stand as intellectual minnows yet, even so, they have their own rather beguiling traditions and peccadillos. It should be obvious their purpose behind agenda groups does not come close to comparing with our would-be opinions about them, but (for easy reading) I will present divisions in “human terms”.

Sub-groups can be thusly classed as positive influence, negative influence, undetected or irrational anomalies. My use of undetected refers to the experiencer’s failure to reference causes and does not imply those (categorised) targeted do not suffer the ill-effects. As we reviewed earlier in my example of one of Barber’s intense concerts, disconnected were very much capable of experiencing the delight of their surrounds. They simply were not able to fully comprehend enhanced aesthetics. Perhaps understandably, those of us that are certain we are positively influenced (by parties unknown) tend to provide “abductors” endearing references. In lieu of abduction, “guide” is the commonest term I have heard used by those stressing positive view. Ones under influence become so attached to these so-called guides, it is as though they were related. Indeed, it is not uncommon for abductees to conclude experiences represent hard evidence confirming interactive manifestations of higher self. In this regard, I personally am aware of various entities that connect with [or to] me from time to time, though (in conscious state) know none intimately. Links present dispassionate communication, which is straightforward and deemed unblemished. I do not necessarily “believe” simply because I am told something, but feedback is strongly considered to highlight potential for truth.

Of course, there is also a dark side to this. More disturbingly, periodically certain dreams (or thought streams) which are not generated by me naturally prompt the question “by who and for what purpose?” Interference always and without exception delivers a particular energy signature that is noticeably aloof. All I can say is it reminds me of “twilight zone”. Yet, these types of consistent influences are not limited to “wraiths”. Our authorities’ do their best to emulate this style of subliminal engagement. Intermittent launch initiatives aimed at crafting outright socio-political control come in many forms. All, of course, wax credibility, whilst obfuscating truth. For instance, under such paradigms, the reality of existence will never be made transparent. Our authorities go to absolute lengths because, by releasing plain truth, they instantly lose their powerful hold over the very commodity they are so desperate to “own” – us!!! Truth needs to be tweaked to satisfy agendas. Authorities know too well it is impossible for individuals to change within any group, but it is eminently possible for any individual to become the catalyst for group change. Thus, key individuals that might drive meaningful change are targeted for influence by those interests organising the current political status quo as well as by mysterious overlords that remain unseen (in the physical sense).

You hear me correctly. The notion that someone might be “possessed” by unseen masters is actually extremely logical. So much so, it would be illogical to assume otherwise. Who said human perceptive range is the limit of spiritual resonance? If so, why do so many recognise acute discrepancies between conscious, sub-conscious and super conscious fields? Modern day psychology is confident enough to confirm there are different domains and practitioners have discovered new “languages” in dreamscape. More and more are beginning to realise that dreamscape is potentially far greater than mere dreams. So here we move into djinn territory. In respect, certain occult groups are that sure djinn do exist; they have devised precise ceremonies designed to awaken them. Perhaps these follow roughly the same patterns ancient African witch doctors invested in to summon legendary Chitahuri. Chitahuri are transcendent figments of reptilian guides, by the way. From the cosmic perspective, distinctively noble, for chi (a variant of ki) means individual traits. Ta is the veil that separates reality from the ether. Hu was possibly the God that human was created “in the image of”. Ri is [white light] will of God (indirect). In effect, Chitahuri describes angels “of sorts”. However, African myths (presumably dating from when it was an island continent) paint a very different picture, for annotated evidence of “angelic” behaviour would better fit the demonic spectrum per our cultural terms.

It seems to me as though nothing has changed. While I write, the world is on the precipice of a giant all-consuming fantastical war. It is fantastical because the singular motive for the war is war. Discerning analysis of reasons contributing to escalations of today’s current “balancing” of affairs clearly demonstrates a wholly mitigated effort to construct war for the sake of war, loosely based on Orwell’s “1984”. Talk in the 1990’s of a switch of “superpower” from USA to Russia, China or both (ironically Yeltsin, sorry I mean British Prime Minister Johnson, referred to “The Party”, a Chinese trademark pulled straight from “1984”, with depressing frequency when in power) is now rapidly coming to the fore. Ignoring Douglas Dietrich’s claims [of Taiwan having the World’s largest tactical nuclear weapons supply], was China to invade, the act would demonstrate a petulant lack of respect for the USA, as would a North Korean “doomsday” missile attack on the mainland or Japan. Now the reason I’m mentioning this is the kind of ultra-political situations we are witnessing today match strategy moves that could be construed as common symptoms of reptilian colonialism. Perhaps I am being cynical here, but I wonder whether the critical state of world affairs is at least partially a response of their False Matrix (detailed later) overlaying (and manipulating “strategic assets”) human thought traffic?

Reptilians, lest we forget, have a reputation for violent immigration. Orion’s Belt and Zeta Reticuli, two of many tragic legacy expansion agencies not-so-ironically have parallel agendas on Earth. They love to conquer with impunity, whether by stealth (CE5 programming) or terror (much vaunted armada supposedly headed for Earth). Even so, their own exalted philosophers preach more about the vital strategic value of defences, which does make an enormous amount of sense. Those confined within an impenetrable fortress are guaranteed safety. Because attack is pointless, the only potentially disabling factors are either lack of inner resources (food, water and so forth) or will to continue resisting attack. This is the style of vice-like approach (or paralysis) totalitarian human factions also employ. “Fairness” (in the true sense) is correspondingly seen as weakness. Just about every nihilistic war would never have ignited had sensible diplomacy been initially sanctioned by stakeholders. Aside from the political posturing, it is very clear to me that every war has been a determination and most definitely not the accidental culmination of disparate “random” factors powers preach about.

From the socio-political perspective, was the world to be broken into soft and hard zones, beyond bureaucratic “duty of care”, policing methods wouldn’t change an iota in “democratic” secular regions. The only change might show Medias less vocally triumphant about “preferred” results in the field. That’s all. Persistent social “wiring” is not limited to power politics though. Check the roads. Every second driver is a bowl of hatred in rush hour – an effect that is typically reptilian. That’s why reptilians are very adept at following rules, because (for them) social friction can lead to unprecedented cycles of conflict. World War II Japanese kamikaze bombers crossed the red line that separates duty from insanity. Today common folks are drawn into using identical terrorist tactics all over the world on a whim. Suicide attacks flourish in epidemic proportions – comparatively. Will we cultivate our first suicide nuclear bomber in living memory? Reasons may seem odd but, compared to us, reptilians can be enormous risk takers, happy to forfeit life if incidence justifies martyrdom. I wonder if the epidemic levels of suicide bombings are a response to extraordinarily high reptilian interaction in (and direction of) human affairs. This thinking also factors potentially grand percentages of Manchurian candidates that may have been “duped” or engaged as unwitting mules carrying explosives to be remotely detonated by parties unknown. We really need to deeply question whether the whole phenomenon is limited to desperate fanaticism or something else. Additionally, while mostly contained to gun running cultures, identical considerations should be applied to the explosion of mass murders by “lone” desperados. Do anti-psychosis medications innocently open illicit gateways to hidden realms concealing dangerous minds?

If my own experience is any reasonable guide here, I have noticed that specific (gene bracket) groups of people naturally see eye to eye, whether incurring partial “family” matters or impartial commercial trade. Outcomes are mainly consistent. People make friends and do business with folks they are “tuned to”. This is a significant clue to boost ongoing investigations as to potential for reptilian general oversight over wholesale human affairs. Are suicide bombers (pawns in position) a piece of the puzzle? Such activities undeniably overstate a visceral lack of respect for life. Most recently that western agents’ (clearly from an “ISIS” offshoot, modelled on pre-Israel Stern Gang tactics) cowardly attack on a bridge that allows transport between the Russian mainland and Crimea proved pointless. Sabotage ultimately achieved nothing more than Media headlines. Even so, this sort of recklessness is nihilistic, void of values, morality – perhaps I could go as far to say “anti-human” which compellingly beckons consideration whether origins of design are not human. And syndromes are not merely limited to extremism. Far from it. People are drawn to their beliefs (when tackling intellectual challenges) more than ever. Truth cannot be cultivated by belief alone. A terrible consequence has the world persistently run by zealots, while peoples’ reactive zealousness invariably doesn’t configure or correspond.

We currently have innumerable schisms separating “political interests” from true righteous thinking (I do not refer to the fake rubbish branded righteous thinking), so in order to assume the veneer of political correctness, social cowardice assures majorities pretend to follow “orders” that don’t suit. Worse still many, out of fear, refuse to explore their inherent life purpose, due to these conflicts of thinking. Why are political masters so worried about “the other” (the proverbial stranger), unless there are unseen string-pullers? We are in the middle of an epidemic of deadly sins. Arrogance is the commonest quality displayed; the choice vulgar pretence to deflect vocal critics. In this respect, arrogance becomes a viable symptom of cowardice. When hemmed in, a trembling reptilian has no option but to bark commands, to make himself appear “mountain sized” to predators. “Posturing” is not restricted to reptilians, of course. This quality (or lack of) is a great feature of Lyran character, who routinely present themselves bigger than they really are. Such intrigue includes their use of the title “Anunnaki” as an introduction to unprepared humans.

Why pretend to be kingpins without wanting a real share of the big game consolidating cosmic affairs? In a sense the whole power vacuum below Israel reminds me of the manner Lyrans have been operating. Very much a matrix within a matrix where nothing and no one can be truly trusted. Paul Hamden of the Zeta Connection has talked at length about (disinformation) screen memories. I cannot stress the importance of researching and comprehending akin phenomena. We are in the process of reviewing a hyper-governance conspiracy and, on face value, it fits the Lyrans’ game plan apparent like a glove. Surreptitious evidence points to their exaggerated role as major players. For instance, one agent was “captured” by our government authorities many years ago. Displaying certain “Grey Being” qualities, the off-shape humanoid had been casually intercepted back in the 1990’s, after it had aborted a malfunctioned stargate transfer. A small amount of “leaked” footage of the ensuing interrogation exists in public domain (some three minutes’ worth, from memory). In response, to really understand what was going on, you must grasp cosmic lore. When cosmic lore is understood, analysis clearly demonstrates the entity’s communications were aimed solely at goading our impudent authorities.

Of course, as our military personnel were not at all versed with cosmic best practice, interview revelations for us “sideliners” present some quite humorous reactions. The “convict” cast himself as a future human (who’d travelled back in time), but all I witnessed was a very contemporary Lyran. If I dare turn the clock forward, more recently I attended a séance hosted by the Zeta Connection (an organisation that claims to have a direct connection to the “Zeta race”). While I was there, event organisers chose to play a short video of Paul Hamden (the oracle introduced last paragraph) “channelling” an entity who coolly announced itself as [one of] the Anunnaki. Voice characteristics were figuratively identical to that mysterious future human. Suffice to say the entity (whatever we decide it was) gave no indication of their creeds’ true role in “big picture” (as far as my analysis is concerned), so it is time to reveal sordid truths, posthumously.

There is more than some irony in the Lyrans’ choice of Anunnaki as “banner”. Lyr (harmonics) of God (An) is not that conceptually far adrift from “God’s rule beneath the feminine essence [of God]”. However, something else rings true here. Years ago, I introduced the notion that, back in prehistoric times, real Anunaki were angered by the dragons in their foolhardy selection of Lyrans as project managers overseeing creation of a range of familiar “reptilian” beings (yes, the same ones who meddle with us). Revelations of this nature are unique to this website, which, as far as I am aware, is the only source. Thus, considering that critical information thoughtfully, might we ponder whether the Lyrans daring stance (appending Anunnaki mask) on Anunaki turf could be construed on some level as an overt declaration of war? Perhaps they think the real Anunaki wouldn’t notice or, if informed, would care less? At best, they must surely realise they rub dangerous salt into old wounds (emphasised by a giant war two million three hundred thousand years ago caused by their overstay of welcome on Earth). Hence my parodies sighting that Israel/US de facto “World War” against Russia (first port after Atlantis) under auspices of a fight over Ukraine/Kazaria (the Yiddish motherland) are more pertinent than ever when considering holistic cosmic advancement. Certainly, Levashov’s (murdered in 2012) undeclared assessment of Putin as “wolf” or “she-wolf” is the sordid key to the enigma, but I digress. So, to make matters worse, Lyran DNA is a baseline used in most (and perhaps all) of their genetic output, which means both “reptilians” and “humans” are progeny (gosh, I wonder if the Genome Project has picked that up?).

To comprehend the real issue (as the Anunaki see it), it is vital to dissect and evaluate spectral “characteristics” of the Lyran. Our sciences obsessively scrutinise symptoms looking for answers as remedy to a body’s inefficiencies. Yet far less can be gained from speculation than scrutinising the detail embedded in reference causes. Following this principle, for genetic profiling, manifest behaviours are your very first “port of call” to enable stringent analysis. In DNA speak, these are exceptionally important, providing access to how spirituality adjusts (or filters down) to the physical world. We know the American authority governing psychiatry employs a manifesto that lists close to three hundred different behavioural traits. Following Freud, modern day practice flails incompetently, but at least semblance of craft recognises the acute significance of behaviour. Thus, in simple terms, Lyran character can be divided in two. One part presents a legacy of astonishing wisdom coveting proud, flawless knowledge. The other reviles a sordid record, plagued with deliberate distortion; untruth not dissimilar to Israel’s/fanatical Zionism’s (aka Globalism) tedious perennial dedication to appalling so-termed “psy-op”. That foul blemish is primarily why the Anunaki did not want the dragons to adopt corrupt DNA in the first place.

Anunaki are permanently non-manifest (etheric) beings, whilst assuming forms at particular [spiritual] frequencies upon impulse. “Flesh and blood” Lyran Anunnaki as such class as comparative mere mortals. That is the fundamental difference between the two camps. Consistent with the persistent bluster emanating from Israel, Lyrans might as well splutter until they explode, because they will never be true Gods. Indeed, the idea that the root of power derives from ownership of DNA is based on equations that segregate Gods from mere morals. To comprehend this, we must overcome the fallacy that they are “the same as mortals, just better” or “the whole thing’s mumbo jumbo because Gods don’t exist”. (If the truth be known) put in most basic language, deities are not mortal because they cannot be mortal. Their mortality is an impossibility. This is because mortality comes with a catch. Everything that is mortal; even when disguising an immortal being, dies. Thus, was an immortal being to opt for mortal status, the transfers from eternal to living would decree vulnerabilities. All living things die and therefore, all living things can also be killed, terminated (do Sumerian tales of Ra’s demise offer an explanation?). This is why and how gene hierarchies came into being. An immortal presence can devote part (or many parts) of its essence by proxy to experience life through mortal bloodlines.

We, all the things that live, provide life for the Gods. In that respect, I have regularly revealed details of the Anunaki chains all the way down to not so humble human or, at least, I thought I had provided correct information until recently. A new “missing link” was made known to me a few weeks back (at the time of writing), due diligence demanding I remedy prior imprecise information. The simple structure of the hierarchy (prior to my recent knowledge upgrade) provided for Anunaki>Ba’al>Drakkon (dragons)>Pteroid>Sephadim>man. Ba’al (praise God), regular visitors will recall, are a group of “unique” entity types which allow the Anunaki to manifest (one level down). Dragons (whilst nothing more than a hunch, I believe were potentially paraphrased as “angels” in Biblical texts, origins emanating from Atlantis or pre-Atlantis times) used to demonstrate the highest spiritual version of physicality when they were physical beings. The giant (spiritual) gulf distancing dragons from Ba’al (possibly remembered as archangels) has always puzzled me. Why has the general inability to directly connect with Ba’al persisted throughout the ages? Alright, paradox may have been a symptom contained by standard limitations of reality (beyond any feasible resolve of its dwellers) but, a missing link (between Ba’al and dragon) did seem the most profitable answer to the conundrum. And of course, another distinct group of this nature does exist on the cusp of reality. According to Paul Hamden, the enigma provides for a group who are given the basic cosmic address “Enorrians”.

When I learn of any ancient previously unknown, my primary instinct is to consider and investigate potential progeny or, dare I say, forgery. By that I mean, a credible cosmic address goes some way to verify (in lieu of valid, checkable witnesses’ evidence) authenticity. Readers should bear in mind, whilst cosmic vocabulary and grammar is unknown to those lacking eternal enlightenment, trappings of primal origin are logically concealed in all languages. Language neither popped-into-existence nor is the result of evolved grunts from “cavemen” but Sanskrit (note: true cosmic tongue is normally delivered orally and without script) is the best source to speculate discovery of cosmic script in condensed format. So, let’s go shopping. But first, words of warning. In some of my early investigations, I used less than perfect modern-day interpretation as to the meanings of Sanskrit in the hope of uncovering evidence for vestige (i.e., by deciphering carefully disguised cosmic script). To be clear, already latent inklings of what to expect were circulating in background (astral messages not fully delivered) but focus on precise cosmic words was (to say the least) fuzzy. More conventional methods of research had the added benefit of redeeming faith-lacking readers’ scepticism, who could look up tabled “bona fide” Sanskrit meanings. We’ve moved on so now non-believers are welcome to privately do additional “homework” and let me know what they discover.

My analysis of the term Enorrian decodes as follows. En should be considered a word that imbues the height of power in any language. Greeks used it to represent “I”, though, usage is impersonal (like “one” in English). To explain, because every “I” anchors to source, all things (at their root) must boil down to source. In this case, at the front of terminology “announcing” Enorrian, vestige must be considered emphasised. “Or” is metal (usually considered precious). Here use is analogical in the same manner Biblical birth stories preserve metaphors. For instance, when ”three wise men visited Jesus” their gifts were symbolic. Gold represented genetic prodigy (in this case, the ability to perform miracles), Frankincense showed Jesus was able to pierce and bypass the veil that contains reality and myrrh “proved” he was the capable anointed Son of God (and true king). Thus, Enorrians, like Jesus, were appointed by God and blessed with extraordinary abilities. The final part of the riddle clarifies so. Ri is the collective essence of the seven heavenly states which also class as jointly partitioned “white light” dimensions. Reptilians (that interfere with our domains) are restricted to black light (Ra) realms, but I will discuss the acute significance later. “An” (pronounced arhne) is a primal definition of the invisible binding force we commonly refer to as God (that one omnipresent God). Collective summary of my analysis calculates Enorrians like so. Gifted angel destined to pay homage to spontaneous creativity seems innocent enough. Critically important to understand, we now know that the Anunaki bandwidth operates across white and black light domains. Enorrians are almost certainly their own version of Sirians, appending restitution.

When Sirian ancestry broke away from the Anunaki group billions of years ago, disagreement was not limited to opinions over preferred form. Rifts had been caused by perception of good and evil. Perhaps inspired by Sophia’s original template for existence (implicating subsequent fall of the Satan star), Sirian ancestors opted for apartheid. Interestingly, obsession over good and evil plays a large factor in human affairs, because we are a substantive part Sirian. Elements of the Anunaki spectrum are very dark indeed (highlighted by Zoroastrian tradition), hence the Enorrian “compromise”. Prosperity’s importance goes beyond debate. Found in Sirian, cosmic word “Si” equivalates to those “connected by memory” alone. Per the full scope of existence, black and white light combined measures the collective presence of God; a sentient being that experiences time in “seconds”; each of around five thousand years. It takes roughly three seconds to regain focus while in natural waking state. Thus, I theorise, each fifteen thousand years (approximately) the primary sentient being flips between white and black light. Latent memory is timeless. Therefore, memory is both the binding agent and extent of chronology.

Chronology is misunderstood of course. We perceive reality ten to fifteen times (faster than) real time (a resource that sits as one “block”), but explanation will wait another day for I must press on with this essay’s dedicated mission. We can see there are numerous elements [unseen] that “corrupt” the destiny of man. That is because man arguably has no destiny without them. Yet, to more thoroughly envisage considerations, we are best advised to scrutinise the history of human, from our lowly beginnings. The truth about this, even when approaching causes with an unfettered open mind, has been jealously concealed. Hearteningly, some are gradually starting to question whether all history amounts to “propaganda offered as historic account”. I must say acknowledgement of wholesale fabrication is a truly positive sign that people are finally coming to terms with perpetual injustices wrought against them. Even though there is an enormous gulf of understanding to traverse, small, wavering steps are a beginning and certainly better than no steps at all.

People are just starting to realise that authorities (not willing to disclose the truth) have opted for strategies that either distort opinions or lie convincingly, but everyone would be shocked knowing just how far adrift our general knowledge (amplified by propaganda) has unhinged from reality. Hints of truth are presented in ancient texts, but because context is lost, it is almost impossible to see the light without cosmic guidance. Thus, details I am about to present are bound to ruffle staunchly “academic” (height of the brainwashing agenda) feathers. Content is guaranteed to fail to impress those beyond hope of restitution. Suffice to say, prepare for truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, because that is what I aim to deliver. Dates used are always approximate of course, so please don’t crucify the messenger for that. Regular visitors should already be aware human being was illegally created by the reptilian Sephardim (who are the prime species of a Lyran coordinated experiment commissioned around five million years ago) “just” one hundred and twenty-five thousand years ago. Human is principally a version of Neanderthal (Adam). Following our creation an incubus period of around five thousand years ensued when “we” lived in the inner Earth with the reptilians at their Garden of Eden. According to one of Simon Parkes’ memorable AMMACH interviews, his childhood mentor (a Draco monarch) claimed he watched over little Adam and a band of two hundred other hubris humans. Whilst the account lacks a little credibility as Adam means “explosive storm” (denoting Neanderthal’s temperamentally destructive character), I include the information. Over the “Garden of Eden” period we were treated much, much better than pets by our “Gods” (sic).

One hundred and twenty thousand years ago a giant cosmic war (the eighteen thousand years war) erupted over control of Earth. Attacks also targeted inner sanctums. So, to preserve our safety, the reptilians called for assistance. Details on specifics are not yet known to me but, suffice to say Sirians (who are our joint custodians via genetic heritage) agreed to provide a haven on Mars. Though we are principally built from Neanderthal, they do not have a cerebral cortex, which offers best evidence for Sirian progeny. It must be stressed the human brain is a powerful gift, one that even reptilians don’t share (cutting them off from white light or ri domains). I am almost certain the angered God cameo in Biblical Genesis’ Fall from Grace parable is a direct reference to this Sirian intervention which has been slightly misinterpreted by chroniclers. Incidentally, reptilians are one type of many varied creeds scattered around the cosmos (some used by the Lyrans to cultivate a super-DNA pool). In fact, innumerable different reptilian like species exist in out of reach places. At the time of our exodus, we met with a placid animalistic variety that was native to the Mars surface. Overtly affectionate, chronicles place it as “closer to animal than being”. Lumerians (sorcerers) (who live in underground Martian caverns today) were there as well, until they relocated to Earth around seventy-five thousand years ago. Compared with turbulent human history, (under Sirian jurisdiction) time went by without incident until thirty-eight thousand years ago. Whilst the cosmos is robustly designed to ensure space debris never collides with large planetary objects, comets are the exception to the rule.

According to pristine record, a shooting star of considerable size and velocity plunged into Mars. Tragic effects saw a ninety per cent reduction of breathable surface atmosphere, which predetermined a huge problem. Sirians had no option but to return to Earth (or find some other contender) immediately. Comparatively recently (say five hundred thousand years ago) an aborted “body share” contract with the Anunaki predicted deadly consequences was any reunion to occur. So bitter was the feud, Lemurians had been installed as kings to “protect” Earth’s surface (did they double as sentinels guarding a Garden of Eden placed out of context?) against Sirian return. Lyrans had proclaimed themselves Earth kings until they were thwarted by the Lemurians, an occasion possibly explaining honours from the Anunaki (themselves failing in that quest twice). Lemurians traditionally have no regal structures, preferring the establishment of hierarchies of elders (a principle modelled by “Hebrew” King David?). Nevertheless, in their unfamiliar capacity as kings (which explains adoption of Grey Being mentorship, though early human dynasts may have been deceied by cloaked Lyrans, earning the reputation of “wicked” in Vedic texts)), implications of honour were such that Lemurians might have been obliged to kill Sirians (sworn enemies of the Anunaki) “on sight”. Fortunately for prosperity, the Anunaki had undergone a convenient ascension just before the party from Mars arrived, so “technically” Lemurians were no longer tied to an authority. That is the way they must have interpreted fate, because the Sirians were not only saved, but welcomed to Earth as brothers.

The southernmost boundary of a specially provisioned territory is marked by the Great Pyramid of Giza (constructed under deep water by the way – perhaps validating the Dogon myths). Civilizations were remembered later as Atlantis (did Plato deliberately distort this truth?). To be clear, Atlantis territory covered most of what is now known as the Northern Hemisphere. Biblical Babel possibly refers to an impressive technology city (constructed much later in the 20^th or 21^st millennia BC) which was crushed by arctic circle compacted ice (residue of Fallah – eye in the sky), but other less ostentatious cultural centres were established in multiple locations. One can but presume all humans chaperoned from Mars initially habited Atlantis’ great “towers”. Political modelling would have been quite different to the relative anarchy that prospered after the fall of Atlantis. Human councillors (or chieftains) had been obliged to observe and rectify all social grievances, so leadership was usually more of a great burden than a blessing for any citizen (did ancient Greek “king for a day” democracy attempt to resurrect the Atlantis blueprint?). Spiritual governance (post absence, a vacuum that was eventually trivially replaced by religions) came under mandate of the Sirians.

Within the confines of their enormous cities, humans wanted for nothing and, though life would have been tediously regulated, there were special internal [holographic] parks catering for essential rites of passage or pilgrimages (which could include spiritual sex ceremonies). Even so, because everything was provided, humans did not learn how to fend for themselves properly in a punishing natural environment. All was fine and dandy – until austere punishments were imposed against transgressors of order. Indeed, the whole idea of “pure societies” emanates from Sirian governance over the Atlantis citadels, which were literally impenetrable (Israel’s prototype “dome” pales in comparison). According to the Sirians, only two punishments were necessary, and I think this gives us a clue as to their impeccable logic. Irredeemable offenders were put to death – analogically wiped from existence. Remainders were banished – purged to ensure society always remained pure. Thus, there was no penal system as such, because that would be irrelevant. Banishment forced a harsh life scavenging for survival on the hostile outer lands. Scenarios were made even more bleak considering ejected had had no survival training at all and had been used to everything provided for them. We can but imagine the culture shock and I believe Biblical Genesis’ wilderness period may be loosely based on memories of such collective social expulsion.

Sirians did send out numbers of priests to assist with passage of banishment (perhaps accounting for Mayan “Viracocha” tales). The miracle working Jesus and other idolised characters that populate our corruption of history are also probably based on their memory. Though Sirians look like humans, their powers transcend empirical rationale. Suffice to say their support network was essential because otherwise many of the banished would have likely perished. To put things in perspective, you literally went from having everything to nothing. Aside from the roaming creatures that could kill and eat you, along with other dangers, there were no houses, hostels, hotels, hospitals or even eateries. Your world, in an instant, had become an unsafe, a neither explored nor inhabited desert island. Thus, historians rightly talk of a “caveman” existence where humans lived near (but rarely with) flesh eating Neanderthal. This is truth because, in lieu of absence of prebuilt accommodation, caves were pretty much the only shelter option. And of course, following the plummet of Atlantis, survivors were forced into the same boat as the rest, except they had the disadvantage because the others had become hardened scavengers by now. For a very brief period, this is when a clash of cultures ensued between those that wished to preserve Atlantis ideals and remainders who had resiliently moved on. Worse still, battle (symbolised by Cain “broken covenant” versus Abel “God, the common father”) would rage over total control of an apathetic human group. A tradition that has continued over the ages. Today we are nearing “end game”.

Long prior, there had been a vicious war (round two) between reptilians (who had successfully barricaded themselves inside Earth by now) and the Anunaki. Though the Anunaki did not manage to secure the inner sanctums to achieve their aim of “harmonising Gaia”, they were by far the most powerful force, which means the reptilians perpetually fear them (even today). They had feared them so greatly, none dared venture to the surface for a considerable period. Some argue the date of incursion (when the Anunaki launched their full-on attack of inner realms) was around five hundred thousand years ago (just before Gilgamesh’s epic Sumerian King’s list lineages emerged). It wouldn’t be until hundreds of thousands of years later that reptilians would brave presence on the surface, such was the strength of their angst. In fact, the truth of the Anunaki departure perhaps only became known to them when Sirians made approaches because they needed technicians to man their (earlier mentioned) purpose-built technology city. So, from around twenty thousand years ago, with a renewed sense of safety, reptilians slowly began targeting the peoples of Africa. At this time today’s northern part of Africa was submerged by oceans (hence why the Great Pyramid must have been constructed below deep water – a whole enigma in itself!), which had been caused by dramatic Anunaki departure, consequence of their impromptu ascension. By comparison, the reformed landmass analogically matches well with modern day Australia’s island continent.

Why reptilians’ selected Africa in particular is unclear to me. Perhaps there was easy passage from inner Earth (gateway long forsaken and most likely boobytrapped today). Perhaps they felt the Nubians (then Olmec) would be more receptive or gullible than other human gene brackets (races). Perhaps their selection was sheer coincidence, after all. Suffice to say, what began as a trickle built and built to a major “problem” over a relatively short period. We can see from the sheer numbers of stone rods (laser weapons) left behind, by seventeen thousand BC their influence had reached epidemic proportions. African peoples needed a champion to drive out this foe. Hosanna (Ixosana) infamously jumped to the task (although, today, courtesy of corrupt history, there is no memory of this). Discounting their enormous technological advantage, while physically present on the surface, reptilians were exposed, to say the least. In that respect, they did have a gaping Achilles heel, one which Hosanna promptly exploited. Their allergy to tungsten renders the metal deadly poisonous to them. One scratch from a tipped spear is enough to severely disable or even kill its target (is this how “werewolf” silver bullet myths were percolated?). I wonder whether tungsten steel used to make modern day commercial darts is reflective of the legacy. Either way, the precious metal proved to be a great deliverer and that is one of the best reasons why Hosanna is foggily remembered as a holy liberator. It was only after they had been thwarted that the reptilians employed stealth technology to influence human populations they desired to harvest in place of overt presence. Any further attempts to physically control communities would deliver zero trust brute force.

Rapid fall of Atlantis and subsequent “flood” was a two-stage event. Initial impact fourteen thousand eight hundred years ago caused circumstances that triggered a great deluge two thousand three hundred years later. These circumstances so dramatically interrupted carving of “Mayan” wheel of the sun, it was discovered where it languished, unfinished. Buried Siberian mammoths and other creatures have been dug up with food still in their mouths or undigested in their bellies. The fall of Atlantis was a crisis beyond all other crises. Consequences suggest that no one could have survived such a cataclysm, but for the fact I side with Graham Hancock’s opinion proposing an ice sheet from destroyed [ancient moon] Fallah only blanketed the Southern Hemisphere (which became the Northern Hemisphere while causing the great flood). Though I have no formal feedback on the subject, I deduce human populations (ancestors of today) along with all the animals were restocked from holdings taken from the moon following that “irredeemable” deluge. At least that’s how I interpret Noah’s ark parable from Biblical Genesis. Reptilians were clearly aware of the devastation the planet surface had incurred (possibly suffering consequences themselves) and perhaps were part of contingencies that arranged restocks of populations (which would have retained full latent memory of past historic development). It was at this time that they decided to make a formal move, setting up bases at the peaks of the Caucuses of Persia (if traditional legends have sway here). Heart of Atlantis’ banished scavenger settlers, Russia would conveniently use Persia as an access corridor to other lands, which explains Slavic influence of inter-bred Indian Dravidian populations and why Sanskrit is considered a very ancient form of Russian script by philologists.

That cuddly caring veneer of the Garden of Eden was a distant memory by now. Draco lockdown, committed to avoiding a repeat of the Africa fiasco, employed state of the art surveillance and weaponry. The “pets” were presented various “laws” to which some minor infractions were dealt with by inflicting instant death. There neither were law courts nor due process for humans, presenting a situation that perhaps corresponds with obscene shoot first and ask questions later “justice” for Palestinians today. Humans, who need to breathe spiritually, were treated like animals by their captors. Under these conditions, we were huddled into demarked areas, “pens” which could be monitored day and night. Even so, reptilian broader populations are very similar to ours in some ways. If I might cite the current penal system. Yes, there are guards, austere rules, obsessive detention, but there is also the good side – rehabilitation, reskilling and opportunity to build new lives, to infect rebirth as it were. Reptilians work off identical models as us for captive societies. Over the post Atlantis period, they employed great sages to administer education and productive recreational activities. Evidence for this is abrupt. One North American (Canadian) native tribal totem pole features a reptilian effigy (a prized tribute). There are numerous other transcripts verifying similar honours. Aboriginal legends are divided between “violent oppressors” and “angelic teachers” who “could not be separated by appearance”. Mayan texts and others follow identical themes. Like us, our tyrants don’t look noticeably different to the standard mould. This shows there is considerable academic diversity in reptilian philosophising. They may well be different to human, but their character is by no means polarised.

My attempts to consider all possibilities enabling truthful historic accountability so far has tabled human evolution from incubus Garden of Eden containment one hundred and twenty-five thousand years ago to “masks off” reptilian incarceration sometime after ten thousand BC. Desperation may best fit post Atlantis circumstances, but at no juncture over the prior one hundred and fifteen thousand years development were we fully granted licence over our own destiny. While terms as abject prisoners of reptilians hit this fact home, conditions had always been “provided” (up to that stage of our development). I am about to make a very important observation which summarises the major disservice caused by corruptions roguishly biased authorities love to claim is “history”. It seems obvious to me that someone in the exact same authority not only knows the truth but overall tries to simulate reptilian techniques used over their dark times of leadership. It might seem off-topic, but what exactly is meant by Joseph’s “multi-coloured dream coat”? Was this a “device”, a tool enabling elite access to “dreamtime” in fully conscious state? Did that allow true vision? Whatever the case, the ensuing period is the most critical in our independent history, a history without evidence of organised human civilisation prior to four thousand BC and I’ll explain why.

If we are to presume the restock theory is accurate, then after the fall of Atlantis different human race brackets were introduced to the surface in staggered batches (information significantly verified by the Genome Project even though it is sworn to protect corporate Globalism). Gauging consistency across surviving myths and legends, reptilian intervention/rule went far wider than the Persian Caucuses, though that may well have conceivably marked the beginning of the initial afront on humanity. It is difficult to say with precision when the wholesale capture of humans ended, but I have always felt around eight thousand BC was right enough. My first hypothesis as to why the reptilians largely disappeared (other than a few lonely hermits holed up in untraversable desert regions) was they had simply ascended. An ascension marks a big shift in the body’s energy frequency that leads to significant changes in surrounding “reality”. However, there is a rather more mundane explanation for their mass disappearance. Mayan history (per Incan records) details human sacrifice reaching epidemic proportions of two hundred and fifty thousand lost souls a year. Belief in reptilians’ “invincibility” might have staved off outright rebellion up to a point, but I would argue that two hundred and fifty thousand involuntary deaths a year would be enough to snap any population into violent defensive action, no matter how appealing deflecting propagandas pretending to justify carnage were. It seems to me that Mayans are the most likely contenders opting for all out aggressive war against their captors and I wonder whether (as with the prior African rebellion) that was the domino effect sparking total collapse of visible reptilian authority.

Though, over the interim period, once “slaves” roamed free, this round the reptilians did eventually manage to reimpose a contingency leadership. Contemporary Phoenicians and Israelites were one such “free” people. I use “one people” because, consequence of turmoil from reptilian departure, cowardly Israelites distinguished themselves by fleeing to the deserts as fast as their legs would carry them, leaving their desolate Phoenician brothers behind to “face austere consequences of an abrupt return to order“. It is worth highlighting something else. Common fallacy that slaves can be emancipated is legacy of deliberately misrepresentative propaganda dressed as historic fact. Slaves were a biproduct of the creation of Atlantis, a symptom of banishment. Unprepared and vulnerable dissidents would inadvertently become a permanent underclass. Such conditions approximate the fodder of conceptual slavery, actually a charitable form of social security (provided for initially by Sirian priests). Later, emerging as a battle “truce” between “civilised” classes and the forsaken, concepts were adapted to allow affluent households to take in (or advantage of) voluntary workers on the promise that all living necessities would be supplied free of charge. Per detailed arrangements, sufficiently sick or disabled workers were obliged with full support over a recouperation period and rape was a theoretically (though inexorably hard to prove) punishable offense.

When James II of England “imposed” slavery “for whites” after wars against the Irish, it would have been considered a benevolent act providing succour for displaced women and children of fallen warriors. But our historians are psychopathic, despicable liars, so they mostly offer forgetfulness. Phoney baloney “history” is rendered all the more farcical when we inspect the detail of that celebrated akin ancient Roman cultural profile. Following their “successful” invasion of [then] Britain, historians lead us to believe the English were rendered as slaves (extending the Queen Boudica fantasy). Yet, their “captors”, desperate to gain uptake of bronze or copper currency (once sought after in Babylon), buried giant treasure troves of coins for their “captives” to prospect. So unpopular was the commodity, Brits are still digging up the damned coins today. Clearly English were not made slaves under the Romans, beyond occasional individuals who voluntarily opted for a “better life” (where have we heard that old trot before?) overseas. Reptilian occupation of human societies ironically does partially conform to traditional views of slavery. For instance, a trigger-happy reptilian guard could be an authority unto himself. Unpopular humans were killed on a whim. The choice of replacement leaders (following reptilian departure) probably provided for a worse lot overall, though. Charles Hall once aptly described the type of “Grey Being” (YHWHs?) that had been selected as “uncompromisingly arrogant and with not even the slightest empathy for human feelings“.

These little pot-bellied, blue skinned men were drafted as our governors over approximately two thousand years. In line with the human condition, again It is likely we initially tolerated oppression, deflecting concerns, desperately trying to parry with “crazy new order” (or new normal). As time went by, more and more would have resorted to teaming up with renegade anti-society. Eventually (we can but presume) the situation reached critical mass when anti-society burgeoned into an overwhelming majority, a catalyst that would have surely boiled over into a mass uprising against the little leaders. Potentially vicious, it was likely violent enough to remove an entire regime, if this theory is correct. Funnily enough, according to Charles Hall the same type of “Grey Being” he had described had “had to” abruptly leave the Earth (their traditional home) around six thousand years ago – infancy of human civilisation. Even so, they apparently relocated to the moon but do periodically visit Earth (at least once accidentally filmed in Brazil).

From notorious orthodox Jewish beginnings (which is naturally echoed by Mosaic religions) “the world” commenced roughly six thousand years ago. So critically why does such conjecture deliberately ignore clear and present prior history with farcical distain? Obviously because corruptors have always had an eye on the goal of assuming total power and dare not reveal agenda conflicting truths, particularly ones that confirm man predominantly has had no destiny of his own. Were they to do so (honestly), today’s academia would be obliged to paw though troves of flawless balanced wisdom bound in hidden Sirian and other legacies (including documents preserved by the Vatican and some private reserves in Tibet) to determine very different conclusions to ones that currently reign. In the distant past circumstances were also different. Then some truths were ever present and known, which motivated an ongoing zealous mission (spearheaded by the corrupters) to stamp out all memory of true knowledge via censorship and propaganda. Such onslaughts included Constantine’s torching of the great library of Alexandria, but there were numerous other reflective purges. Dark Ages are thus termed for a reason, as Michael Baigent et al’s Holy Blood, Holy Grail is quick to reflect. We can push vision farther. Would the whole concept of ownership below a capitalist commerce baseline fare well morally speaking for a truly pure society? Hardly, when (Zionist) “socialist” despots view unabated free trade as the great sin and cancer of their ultimate directive – total control of everything (via beloved Globalist corporations – set up by Mr Hitler). Ayn Rand’s immortal quote figures here: “there is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism – by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.” Under auspices of truth, would not our current “corporate” vision of God also evaporate? Answers are straightforward enough. All religions (as they stand) will be proven invalid, impotent and devoid of purpose if truthfulness is deemed an absolute.

This is not to say that today’s religions are big ol’ phoneys or entirely useless, but what is meant by spirituality would need to be re-evaluated and corresponding changes made to instruction to parry with essential divinity. Though we have come under our own direct authority for the past six thousand years, manipulative infiltration has continued, relentlessly. Why did Jesus/Josephus fanatically emphasise notional “possession by demons” and Mohammed prioritise vanquishing djinn? Epidemic problems we face today have their roots right at the beginning. Either demons never existed, or we are in denial of the fact today, because we “can’t see”. Vedic texts make novel use of surrogate “zombies” and we’ve reached the stage where it is time to reveal what is meant by such concepts. It goes without saying, I would imagine many will be shocked by these revelations, as real zombies don’t live up to their “TV image” surprise, surprise. To add, as might be expected, to present zombies authentically, we need sufficient background. We must walk before we run or we trip and fall, oblivious to error.

Reptilians began work on their false matrix (a supernatural star satellite system) directly after the fall of Atlantis. Critical impact of the fall [perhaps] endured less than one second of time. Whilst I don’t see any record of Sirians being dug up on Russian or other excavation digs, detail on humanoid anomalies might easily have been censored (given the constant political climate emphasised the paragraph before last). Even so, it is likely Sirians were as equally caught by surprise and were as ill-prepared as the rest by this unprecedented and most unnatural of disasters. Nevertheless, could it be possible that some [Sirians] were saved or had been located on the other hemisphere, and they lived long enough to be there to provide rectitude against effects of that global wide doomsday flood? If so, my previous analysis was incorrect. Small numbers of survivors could have kickstarted modern day populations (Noah a metaphorical Sirian), though I favour a compromise between the two explanations (restocks bolstering saved populations). Some aboriginal Indians and Nubian gene sets were certainly introduced post flood.

A few straggler priests may well have remained, but Sirian autonomy completely collapsed with Atlantis. One can only presume that they would not have approved of the false matrix, otherwise construction might have begun more than twenty thousand years ago. Though, most compelling explanation for any lack of cooperation is knowledge revealing the moon’s role in operations. Sirians followed the Tamarian model (announcing a universal God), whereas reptilians worshiped a black sun (our sun) emanating Ra (filtered God). The false matrix operates like a prism to direct greatly “refined” sunlight (in a sense, identical conceptual analysis could be applied to “GMO”). Sunlight, I have explained over many other articles, is the real key to progressive DNA (true “evolution”). In other words, from day one, the false matrix aimed at tampering with our DNA sequence development, which establishes who we are. Chillingly, Ken Bakeman claimed the project was finished (and I quote) in 1993! But the false matrix is not the only initiative. There have been others. Critically, five separate frequency fences block activity transmissions via the human group chakra points (harmonising energetic values of DNA). Ironically (or perhaps not) each change met with a flip side and that is why scientists were forced to make so many alterations.

Knowledge of this travesty tells us everyone is not meeting full potential. Another initiative was implemented to the human group around the mid nineteenth century primarily to change mindset. I fear that liberty jargon falsely heralding abolition is not coincidental. Humans were about to be transformed into real slaves and that needed a change of mindset for all society not to plunge into violent retaliation. Robert Peel’s virgin London police force predicted anarchy and [indeed] measured anarchy was the response. Australia’s Ned Kelly was one such violent product. But, on record, the industrial revolution did somehow save the day (for those ruthless, vapid industrialists). Celebration must be considered a smoke screen, of course. Changed attitudes were closer to the truth as these ensured a relatively seamless positive transition (aided by a supporting punitive, vicious penal system), because without them, society would have certainly plunged into anarchy (which almost happened in Germany, courtesy of “western powers’” reparations, but for the emergence of Mr Hitler). I wonder whether the explosive erosion of traditional values in the contraception sixties was equally synthetic. Was that in fact a preparation for a “new age” by unseen planners not-of-this-Earth who were privy to future outcomes? We know “raw time” can be captured and duplicated. What might seem farfetched to humble Earth dwellers is worlds apart from what is truly possible.

Marginally successful alterations to catalytic DNA commissioned by frequency fences did have a clear objective; to stall the ascension process, ideally indefinitely. Yet, because the ascension wasn’t stalled (doomed Philadelphia experiment made that clear), vaccine bioweapons (released under US department of defence military operation Warp Speed to rapidly implement United Nations Agenda 21) have been deployed to thin down populations with haste so as to sufficiently to meet those UN standards [a Pleiadian ultimatum?]. We (population bulk) will become a shadow of our former selves over the next decade. I can empathise with globalist panic to some degree. “Statistically” a single couple (with sufficient partnering resources) will expand to billions head over eleven generations (two hundred and twenty years) producing surviving offspring x ten. Abolition led to the production of big families as the best means to pooled survival, though phenomenon was also a trend of slavery (when a squire’s half-bred offspring would be given preferential treatment and even inheritance). So, from that clapped out old thrive and survive perspective, troubling times lie ahead. Very troubling indeed. Commercial medicine is facing a train wreck. We can see how quarantine initiatives were rolled out. Ensuring general compliance is a huge aspect of any would be despot’s game plan. Despots rely on military juntas (such as Operation Warp Speed) for good reason. Whilst global quarantine was a relatively low-key affair relying on habitual brainwashing of the masses, other tactics use fear, potentially employing enormous “enforcement” resources. Forgive me for reiterating, bur why set up a London metropolitan police force one year before British slaves were granted “freedom” under abolition? Because people (like Ned Kelly, though from next generation) were forced to take the law into their own hands in order to survive after social security was scrapped. Even today Australian politicians continually threaten to disband modern version Centrelink pensions destined for the unemployed, making it harder and harder for the needy to access “benefits”.

Necessity dictates reptilians use covert techniques now. Their “masses” would have gained extraordinary advantages (including special abilities erstwhile unknown to brainwashed humans) from ascending to uncharted out-of-range physicality so this seems the most likely explanation for their non-presence. Stealth used has pretty much gone undetected, across the board. So much so, more than seventy per cent of all human beings are completely ensnared by them, remainders granted “limited faculties”. Just about everyone is void of awareness as to what is happening overall. If this was a soccer match, we weren’t ever told about it and I am sad to inform, but we lost a hundred to nil at home. And not only that. We lost long ago, because no one noticed. Yes, this isn’t a recent thing. Let me explain something. When you look at the body from an energetic perspective, you can determine that cells, organs, vascular, nervous and other systems are irrelevant, beyond operating as tokens of expression. Then you are ready to review affairs with clear mind. Our bodies appear to function the way they do, because it is all part of the control initiative. We are conceived and then treated as wild animals. Notional spiritual man has been reduced to an anathema by them and their lackeys (read Goethe’s Mephistopheles for inspiration). In fairness, though aspects of the religions have made a courageous stand against the plight of mankind, they haven’t done enough, which has had the effect of plunging truth into obscurity. Truth has become so obscure, today it cannot be believed (by those entranced by their systemisation).

On many occasions throughout my writing career, I have made revelations about atoms, which are “frequency catalysers”, and this news is no less relevant now. Critically, they reflect external settings which, for our reality, not only express as, but also enforce supposed. For those unable to bypass, the atom is the limit of existence, which includes human (in conscious state). Perameters craft reality. Provided by our reality window, energy is generated as a form of black light (Ra). Textbook physics presents reality building blocks as constructed from identifiable “particles”, themselves made up of sub-particle protons and electrons that gravitate around a “nucleus”. Whilst nuclei confirm theoretical nothingness, they better define raw potence (whose gateway is inaccessible by physical means), but here’s the punch. Collective potence configures the soul network. Interestingly, associated notional “magnetism” is more than clumsy metaphor. Believe it or not, the soul network facilitates a role as magnetic tape to preserve all lifetimes. Everyone’s life history accumulates there. No one misses out and record is without blemish. All data is saved free of reservation and will remain uncensored for all time. Ones with multiple life histories (in other words, again everyone) could access complete data at a single point, given memory capability. It might also be possible to “hack” the soul network with correct insight. Therefore, now, armed with this deeper understanding, clearly the soul network is not merely a little bit important, a triviality. It is in fact critical. Were external forces with opposing agendas given access to “keys”, well, that could ruin a life and the user might remain entirely oblivious to consequences. I don’t refer to “run of the mill” hackers here. No, the ones I expose can kill off a body’s higher self and replace it with a synthetic version of their own design. That’s the scale of problem we are dealing with here in a nutshell and it is rife, affecting one hundred per cent of human populations in some measure, zombifying majorities (I wonder if that’s why the system insists on “fairness” of majority rule?).

As far as the body is concerned, chakras (harmonisation of energy field) and meridians (inter-body communication networks) are all important, yet most of our physicians know literally nothing about these. They do not know that magnetic tape facilitating life history is stored by the heart chakra. Few “victims” do a damned thing in defence. So, the average reptilian dummy transports into the crown chakra “access point”, scales down any of the meridian lines to the heart chakra to get into position for a “vault raid”. Their bright and best elevate more extravagant means to go exploring. But simply reaching and “occupying” the heart chakra is not enough. God, dare I say is far cleverer than that. Perhaps this metaphor will suffice. To access life history, the pirate might as well decipher a unique, “unbreakable” multi-factor ID and yet, even that would be too easy. The mighty weight of combined Draco-reptilian technologies cannot crack a heart chakra. Assailants have no other choice than to use other means. I did touch on this earlier in my introduction, so additional musings will hopefully now provide greater clarity. To summarise, the fundamental objective is to obtain permission or “license” from the victim (New World “contracts” foisted on beguiled Red Indian natives probably amounts to the same thing). That’s because the unbreakable forcefield to overcome is denying “will”. It is as straightforward as that. The victim must want the reptilian to access heart chakra resources. Of course, under normal circumstances, to engineer a change of will (belief) might be classed as impossible, but, following well-trodden footsteps of celestial conmen, reptilians blend fusions of fantasy and reality to whip up devilishly misleading cocktails.

As with the vaccine con, they turn the power of ignorance on its head and convert it into an asset. Useful, well-meaning idiots (like all those doctors whose pride insanely backs the vaccine flop) are the perfect commodity for manipulation, because they absolutely “believe in” matters they don’t understand. “Professionalism” ensures a strong, spiteful, sufficiently dedicated ego. The Draco casually surf all those hysterically nonsensical ill-feelings towards them, turn the power back on itself and manipulate the hell out of the reaction. How do they say? “Problem, reaction and…..welcome to hell”, right? Specifically, all those honest-to-goodness soul retrievers facilitate a vicious (circle) agenda. Other spiritual agents, rescue workers ultimately end up causing far greater mischief than if they had left things be, not tried to be experts. They mess with stuff they don’t understand – at all. Yes, there is power to be garnered from sacred verses if you know them and know them precisely. Not only the words, but the precise frequencies and tones. Then, and only then, you might get somewhere. Exceptions join the choruses of useful fools.

I play classical piano to “concert standard” (whatever that is). Thinking back though, pretty much the second I had made it past the dodo stage of development, I used to brag about reaching Nirvana. In truth, over fifty years I haven’t got there and it’s unlikely I’ll ever reach the destination, but I can play a mean tune. Be honest everyone, with yourselves first. You’re not that good, even if you think you are. You step in what looks like girl scout cookies and that can turn out very nasty indeed. They stink and that’s your metaphor for life, as is mine, after we’ve patted ourselves on the back. I’m by no way absolved. I’m in the same boat, the same mess. But I know a thing or two now and that, it seems, is where I have the advantage, the edge. Plus, I’m not frightened to be wrong, and I listen to “oafs” all the time. Sometimes those we hate to be right make valid points, something crucial we (us, God given) overlooked. And that can make a big difference to “big picture”, ultimately affecting everything we know, as we re-evaluate trickle down. In this respect, I haven’t singled out those that dotingly offer soul retrievals and others who claim they can purge bodies of unwanted ephemeral guests because I don’t like them, but they do need to be exposed, because they are the problem. Far from purging the reptilian or “finding” a lost soul, they end up granting posthumous adversaries’ full licence to use the body in any manner chosen. That includes full access to soul history and a broken gate at the heart chakra. Obviously, without false matrix technology, attacks might otherwise prove impotent, but there’s much more to it than that.

Look, perhaps I have overstepped the mark a modicum by chastising our valiant misguided champions so late in the cycle. As far as I can ascertain one hundred per cent (that’s all) of humans are intercepted at birth and put through some sort of “preparation” for life under surrogacy. Roughly seventy per cent currently are transformed into surrogates (by various means) and this identifies the “zombification” process Vedic and Babylonian texts sensationally refer to. Whereas spurious allegations about adrenochrome may go some way to explaining those notorious hallucinogenic blood orgies, more mundanely, to put things in perspective, four out of the average family of five are already zombies. You, reading this, are likely to be a zombie and you have been successfully mystified. This is because you have no reference benchmark to measure against. You only have one life, so that is your “all”. As far as you are concerned, it would be the perfect life given unlimited resources and no rude interruptions. You, as with all the other seventy per cent, have been successfully beguiled, if you are a zombie. And if you are not, then you are lucky. To tell whether you are a zombie is no clearcut thing, but here are a few classic traits. You refuse to even look at information you despise. You have next to no attention span. You do things or have desires that part of you is repulsed by. Your life has become polluted by “double standards” (zombie corruption syndrome). You both fear and yen transparency. These symptoms by no means confirm zombiism, but they are plausible indicators.

How to diffuse possession is troublesome. Realisation can be the catalyst, but we all must remain vigilant and wary of false alarms. Body and mind are amazing healers when power is applied. Yet so few seem to possess inner tenacity or dedication. Everyone seems to want an easy life. Of course, possessors take full advantage of that tradition, bringing the life part way towards Nirvana, then filling the void by tantalising with fantasy; the Santa Claus or God who is always there but never apparent. Dare we inspect the truth, the reality? The vast population majorities are slaves to their workplaces, prisoners of their government, pawns of their “fake money” bankers. An overwhelming percentage have learned to pour all their creative energy (catalyst for resolve) into “sports” (or other otherwise pointless “pastimes”). They use “sports” (or something equally irrelevant) as the milk to soothe their lot. Problems, grand political issues temporarily evaporate over these short periods of apparent freedom. People with no vision beyond personal vanity are incurable, because a pure life requires sacrifice, broken vanity. Removing one infestation of bugs rarely removes the problem, though. Those ill-prepared for constant alert diligence will quickly slip back into old, unseemly ways. Possessors know of this general weakness and readily exploit circumstances. In response to that, I fear John Wayne would have blurted out, “If that seems unreasonable or unfair, then damned well get used to it or do something about it”, but he’s no longer around to offer support. So, if human apathy is to be broken, then our only resolution is to face fear and fight it on our own. Please, rest in peace John.

Whereas your average reptilian lives days far longer in duration than anything we could imagine, he is far too busy to waste precious time on mundane matters, such as possession or surveillance. Therefore, in order to keep each new crop (of victims) warm and obedient, live technology providing “artificial intelligence” automates requirements. In passing, I explained mechanics of the soul in relation to the heart chakra a while back. These play significant roles in this heist. Thinking aloud, I wonder if baptism or some other incanted blessing might provide sufficient “contract” for any would be “credentialled” assailant to be granted access. Not sure on that one but, anyway, the parasitic host will perform something that can only be described as a soul-ectomy right before all doe-eyed, ill-prepared onlookers. The soul is “snipped” (redirected) and a purpose made lifeforce (without its own soul) in an external dimension is used as permanent anchor. You heard me right! But, of course, operations are entirely coordinated by large machines (also located externally to this dimension, censoring any material evidence trail) which are configured to provide real time key performance indicators and demographics. When any new “seed” falters, the host is alerted. Then and only then will a reptilian become personally involved.

There are some exceptions to this rule. Special human talents require different styles of harvesting. By way of reference, I discussed reptilian purpose in some detail last article, but it can’t harm to repeat vital information. This writing project has so far focused on dispassionate abduction, joy riding. There is a more serious side to cultural development. Extreme [human] talents are sometimes deemed to have potential to join the unseen brethren. These lucky individuals are given spiritual guidance (from the overlords’ perspective). As with other forms of abduction, selected targets have no say in their development or exit opportunity from the program (short of death, and even that is questionable). Nevertheless, victims I have interviewed speak highly of their possessors, some going so far as to admit their lives would cataclysmically shatter should their “guides” ever dare leave them. Suffice to say, unions are invariably powerful indeed, perhaps even intrinsic. Here cynics might determine soft emotional terrorism ultimately develops into full blown psychosis. In this capacity, a reptilian would most definitely suffice as a long-lost brother, sister, father or mother. Relationships can also be romantic, proffering intimacy akin to marriage. Comparatively, Malaysian shamans have also claimed to pair with their guides when undertaking sexual-spiritual hallucinogenic journeys. It is difficult to ascertain whether jaunts in altered state pertain to physicality, but reptilian abductees in guided relationships are clear on the authenticity of their experiences. Quite different to processed chattel, who are lulled into their befuddled sense of disagreeable security by the system.

I made a brief introduction to “targeted individuals” earlier in this essay, a side of the coin that exposes hard emotional terrorism. Spiritually aware talents are selected to either join the “borg” or whither, but we must come to terms with the fact, from a strategic control perspective, those humans that “run Earth” are equally viable targets. Mrs Clinton’s parasite lodged in her throat chakra attracts worldwide attention. Though it manifests as a foetal incubus, looks can be deceiving. While US Secretary of State her foul “conscience absent” philosophies were as memorable as her parasite. Conversely, motivated by advantages from political manipulation, she could turn on the charm for any photo opportunity. It is impossible to overlook much of her output was ruled by sarcasm. Even so, when analysing that content (in particular), I find an abundance of inhumane, would be “satanic” sentiment. Might unworldly corruption of the throat chakra have prompted Mrs Clinton to voice words delivered by ghostly apparitions? Obviously, there must be some level of psychosis for her to have delivered alien philosophy without any sense of rebellion. So, we can but assume she would have undergone full zombiism conversion at birth, offering no discerning protest. It is clear, if her traditional background is anything to go by, a pretty surface disguises a vicious heart. Rumours concealing her lesbianism (if true) further point to an “impaired” father and potentially negatively turbulent upbringing.

Mrs Clinton may have drawn the short straw, but when the whole gamut of political arenas is inspected carefully, epidemics of intrigue and lasting legacies of unfinished business beg discovery. Yes, there have been a few achievements too and don’t they lord them at every convenience? For as far back as I can research, politicians have existed to “score points” in deference to achievement and, quite frankly, just about everyone else travels down that slippery slope too. It is not what we do, but what we are seen to be doing that counts in all spheres of life. Hence the immortal expression, “keeping up appearances”. This essay has been zealously committed to going headlong down the rabbit hole. I have done my best to peel back all the layers to expose something stark and real. For once, we are blessed with an opportunity to see things as they are and not as “we want them to be”. Our destiny, based on the bulk of our history, is to be controlled, so it should be of no wonder that development and infiltration go hand in hand. Yet I can’t help but hoping, believing, wanting that we too can break free and be what we are; what we always had potential to be.

Reptilian-Sirian Equation Unlocks the key to Human Sexuality?

Beyond those salacious, mainly “hard to believe” abduction reports that frequently ghost seedier regions of the internet, there is next to no information about alien sexual reproductive or recreational practices. In typical fashion, according to late Karla Turner, from time to time depraved reptilian “overlords” visit human realms, usually accompanied by mischievous “grey” assistants, merely to witness or engage in perverse acts with us. Related subject matter can’t help but involving minors of the youngest ages, presumably to give what would otherwise be considered “smut” extra sizzle. Understandably, hard evidence supporting hers and other far less stable allegations is non-existent. I have found no photographic, video or even astral residue authorities attesting proscribed theories, so believers’ beware. indeed, considering the scandalous nature of information tendered, it would be remiss of me not to question the whole efficacy of what I am expected to bow before. To be fair though, on the other hand, purposeless causes are rare indeed, so might there be something to what Karla and the many others have postulated? They say, “where there is the will there is the way”. So, taking the assumption that some sort of obsessive reptilian control conspiracy over man is real, if we are by some means able to ascertain plausibility surrounding associated assaults on deliberately selected human beings, we would nudge closer to hard truths that tempt to resolve these excessive speculations.

Accounts cultivating said reptilian adductions are far too voluminous for there not to be smoke without some fire. It is not as though tales are necessarily borrowed (in the footsteps of misleading Chinese whisper trails). Details largely come from independent sources, apparently unknown to the other. Decent percentages of abductees, in normal circumstances, would otherwise be skeptical over the whole alien culture genre. Even so, taking this into consideration, human sense of victimhood (sometimes drastically) distorts any true picture. If the truth was known, reptilians see all humans as potential intellectual real estate. In that regard, each “vessel” is cordially open for occupation. For some, journeys are disrespectful “joy rides” which see drivers hammering their vehicles to attain maximum personal gratification. When this is so, naturally the adopted body can willfully be used for vile sexual, sadistic or combinations of purposes. Reptilians love to consume energy exuding from dangerous situations out in the field. In which respect, topically, lust and violence are two of the most popular engagement commodities. However, not all body takeovers are selfishly malicious.

Hierarchically human is but one rung down their genetic ladder. So follows, some adventurers see abduction enterprises as something divinely commissioned. These specific causes desire responsible enlightenment, under unspecified terms applying perceived duty of care on victims. Here, entities will join bodies only with view to improving them; a forced, though mutual, partnership to proffer spiritual nirvana. From our sovereign perspective, quintessentially the main problem with this approach is instructors routinely make headlong attempts to “transform” their human quarry into their own image without permission. Matters are made depressingly worse, because for normal integrated human society, reptilian values simply don’t work. This may be due to the emphasised Sirian component of our DNA, which allows us access to higher realm white light spirituality (commonly “off limits” to reptilians. Note: they do have functional Sirian DNA in their own genetic makeup, but resources are not concentrated in mind space). Thus, for the purist, educational processes can equally as well degrade as improve human spirituality, notably when focusing on matters of conscience. Indeed, I have had direct experience of this with an ex-student who succumbed to her (birth “ordained”) parasite. While “under occupation”, no matter what I instructed her either computed or resonated. Rather, to her altered state of mind, the opposite of what I advised was always going to be instinctively true. Information offered was deemed a corrupting influence instead.  Subsequently, even after removing the parasite, due to passive historic residue “sewn” into her DNA, the student has not recovered sufficiently to return her former self up to now, which depresses me, though she has acknowledged that I’m “the greatest teacher she has ever followed”. Perhaps I will unravel the full sorry story in a future episode.

My own story isn’t the greatest either currently. Courtesy of a pungent act of fate, I was forced to relocate to one of the gravest “statistically” infected areas of Sydney (under license of bogus “COVID”). Reflective so-called lockdowns have attempted to ensure milling public populations are cordially muzzled. Though, as a conscientious dissenter, austerity measures haven’t applied to me, consequences are such that I have no workplace to visit until the pantomime ends. This means zero income for an indefinite period is the frightening outcome, leaving me back at “square one” or up a certain creek without a paddle (for those that have been following my personal saga). Thinking positively though, I do have plenty of “spare” time, a sturdy computer and unlimited internet. Possibilities may be endless, but I rather fancy promoting my live Skype sessions which, though come at an excessive price, are “extremely good value” (or so some past clients tell me), is my best option. So expect something unique coming from how I evaluate who or “what” you are and how that relates to your assured life purpose (and I assure you everyone has at least one of those). You can visit this link to investigate more on how to help me help you.

Copyright Tim Kaiser

But for now, continuing, of all the alien genre entity types, “Earth bound” reptilians are physically so similar to humans, in correct attire most would be able to mingle in with any “crowd” without obvious recognition. The main cosmetic anatomic difference, when cloudy comparison is made, can be found in the structural design of the foot, which, for them, best resembles the nomadic camel’s hoof. Also their skin regularly shows characteristic mottling. However, taking into account our abundance of stylish tattoos, such effects would easily be overlooked. Generally speaking, they are sleeker and more muscular looking than us. Facial features are distinctive, presenting ethnic qualities. Dramatic eyes bring transcendental effects to life, which noticeably lift facial features.  Of course, many will be aware of the wide range of reptilian types out there (only a percentage directly associated with Earth), but here, in this example, I single out the group (knowledge worthy call Sephardim) that once were “real” in our domains. As mystics, though they didn’t commonly integrate with human societies, our hardiest adventurers would enduringly travel to greet them, hoping to attract morsels of illicit wisdom otherwise unavailable via normal channels. Reptilians form extended families who adopt rather inflexible “cultural standpoints” on things in general, so, in their realms, when one is for the group, all are for the group. Failure to comply would be considered a great transgression, for those that fall wayside of the cultural trend tend to be deeply mistrusted and, as such, considered surrogate adversaries. Prior to her “conversion”, in my capacity of teacher, I was my student’s best friend. Subsequent to her oppressive transference (mesmerized by reptilian takeover), I instantly morphed into a despised agitator as if by magic.

Reptilian sexual anatomy corresponds well with human modelling, suggesting past inter-species reproduction is a plausible consideration. On that front I have speculated before that the human female’s distinct obsidian characteristics [compared against our males] are the evidential legacy of ancient inter-breeding. Notably, Biblical Genesis’ enigmatic “fall from grace” parable emphasizes woman feared the serpent only after God decreed it would permanently slither on its belly. (Implied through context here) prior perambulating serpents represent Sephardic overlords who governed human colonies and some of these were greatly admired (affirmed by aboriginal legends). Genesis textual analysis profoundly suggests women (in particular) found great affinity with them subsequent to the sanctioned punishment. Further quirky validation can be discovered inasmuch as reptilian males and females both “tick” to a similar beat to our females. This considered, stature and sexual “curves” roughly approximate qualities embroiled in human gender divides, though these are perhaps pronounced in different measure in reptilians. For instance, male sexual organs can be significantly larger than the human counterpart, hair free and blue in colour, but otherwise apparently the same. Interestingly, reptilian females have much more compact sexual openings. Breasts are less well-endowed failing to produce as much milk. Nevertheless, design-wise, they follow the same basic template as us.

Cultural habits are an area where we significantly branch. For instance, per Lyran royal tradition, a female may take on another female as permanent friend/confidante/lover for purposes that include recreational sex. She will also almost certainly have an alliance or marriage with a male, who would provide reproductive [and possibly recreational] sex. Organized polygamous relationships are generally not frowned upon within wider culture brackets (i.e. Lyran/reptilian and associated hybrids). Equally estranged, sexual “hang ups” are rather different to ours. In fact, their whole conceptualization shaping lust and reproductive desire hardy resembles anything humans would appreciate. First off, they divide up amorous behaviour into portions potentially satisfying up to four independently separate functions. In the same manner we might determine “opposites attract” equally as well as those that decree they are made for each other, they deliberately break lust into positive or negative functions. Negative motives would explore “fetishes”, aggressive penetration and rape domains to mention a few. Rape, ironically, is a common human female fantasy, albeit parentheses invariably involves the victim being “taken by surprise by a tall, dark stranger” rather than violently attacked. Reptilians highly rate specific energy frequencies generated by sexual situations and can feed off responses. They also regard sex as an important rite of passage, which, in accordance, methods are explored by spiritual guides and the education system.

So, to reiterate, reptilians define sexual behaviour in terms of four distinct categories. Accordingly, there are reproductive, recreational, spiritual and communicative sex variants.

Obviously, limits and boundaries further narrow down reflective etiquette refining each categorization, just as we might view an erotic smooch as an act of love in deference to the friendly granny kiss. Taking eroticism in isolation, they find skin on skin contact will stir enormous passion between participants. To which end responding interaction is effectively regarded as foreplay. Stretching this analogy a step further, skin on skin “the sexual act” might substitute for a deeper form of “communication” (something generally alien to human world view). Their society predominantly appends an unwritten rule that at interactive get-togethers erotic intercourse with the host will legitimize any needy guests’ peace of mind. Spiritually, various lurid of acts of perversion [usually] are used to stimulate “location and connection with God”. This style of sexual interaction is more about ensuring worshipers attain lofty enough energetic heights than satisfaction from experiences. Method and type of vehicle used to make the journey is regarded as perfunctory. Reproduction is split into two fundamental philosophies which boil down thusly. Desirous [or lustful] copulation is deemed no different or more beneficial than flaccid, but functional procreation [as such, presumed lust free]. Significantly defying human Puritan values, recreational sex is encouraged amongst the young whether “within the family” or accompanying strangers. However, close incest is probably frowned upon (demonstrable magnetic qualities compelling closely related couplings is one valid exception believed to celebrate “epochal” reincarnation). Potency is considered an elixir of maturity. So it is supposed, the more sexually potent the individual, the greater the natural maturity. Reptilians, generally speaking, do not insist on our obsessive intellectual development stages that punctuate “age responsibilities”. Most do spend decades devoting themselves to mastery of arts though.

Males under terms of marriage understandably can become jealously protective. Even so, females commonly enter into what we would call illicit extra-marital liaisons. Perhaps this is because erotic coupling is seen as the most effective method to generate or rebuild trust between estranged community members.  Sex, by the same token, can be used as a business negotiation tool as well. I should point out here that, from the reverse perspective, those that take a devotional spiritual path would unlikely engage in any illicit meetings; twilight or otherwise. Specific gatherings [which equate to orgies] arranged between God seeking devotees are cooperative means to achieving correct energetic environments sufficient for mutual passage. It should be highlighted here that the notion of togetherness is far more prominent in reptilian sexual coupling attitudes than ours. Travelling the spiritual path, though young wouldn’t usually be regarded as grounded enough to resonate with enlightenment, as I mentioned before, early sexual accountability is encouraged as a wider developmental tool, so corresponding involvement at these specialist events is not unheard of. Said young females (in particular) tend to circulate around mature aged men and women for inspiration, whereas immature males (less inclined to fraternize with the opposite sex) would more regularly experiment amongst themselves. For reptilians, etiquette casting proper (or appropriate) sexual communication is universally revered. Indeed, those that break rank risk relational frictions brewing up to violent attack. Serial offenders have been made outcasts of civilized society.

Humans may well instinctively believe in sovereignty (though most wouldn’t recognise true liberty even if they tripped over it), but for reptilians, in this respect, society functions differently. The group is considered “culmination of all” and, therefore, it goes without saying that group will is so highly valued it may as well represent applicable divinity. Loosely speaking, laws prepared for society are well trusted because they are designed to optimize communal functionality. Almost the opposite, our laws are fabricated from loaded rhetoric and this consequentially obfuscates popular cohesiveness in preference towards specific agendas commonly devoted to benefiting the select few, which also identifies the main difference between human and reptilian systems of justice. Their reforms go way beyond social equality. They have found that gifted, ably educated offspring are the key to prominent flourishing society. Correspondingly, it is no surprise that families will go to extraordinary lengths to refine a presumed “perfect” procreative genetic match. A form of caste system operates, almost exclusively. Insomuch marriages sometimes will find conflicts separating sexual desire from reproductive determination, which explains why their peoples are largely so tolerant towards extra-marital relations and lustful licentiousness. Reptilians are happy to be guided. For them there are appropriate ways and inappropriate ways. Was a mother or daughter to prostitute herself to serve a desired genetic path, the sacrifice would be deemed entirely appropriate, perhaps even philosophically “necessary”. Across society there is an overall belief that individuals must learn from garnered experiences.

Whereas great leniency is given to “law breaking” youngsters, what we might revile as abusive rituals are considered [by their communities] to be part and parcel of essential learning curricula.

Indeed, once maturity is reached, rite of passage doesn’t end. Similar to competitive chess players, they see their lives before them like board moves and can predict/prepare many steps in advance (such as the damage sewn into my ex-student’s DNA). On one hand, we should accept the overall observation casting reptilians as extraordinarily obsessive (when compared to humans) which explains why those adopting “prim and proper” lives observe prescribed standards religiously (i.e. using denial and ignorance as rudders to selectively steer a desired life path). Yet it would be remiss of me not to highlight a massive associated contradiction here. Reptilians have no sense of honour (as we know it). Whilst their laws are zealously coveted, individual contracts between associates are considered to merely present “guidelines”, so, in effect, these are barely worth the paper they are drafted on so to speak. Guidelines are that flexible, participative interpretations can completely disintegrate original ethos supporting agreements. Any humans “in contract” with reptilians should take note of this and would do well to be exceptionally cautious about their relationship status. Nevertheless, at the bargaining table, if a chitahuri (individual lifeforce acting as spiritual ambassador for the God “Hu”) wants something (badly enough) he or she may well go to any lengths to obtain it. The classic oriental tale surrounding Aladdin’s genie in the lamp affectionately affirms the tradition. Confined to prison, the subject willful spirit promised to commute “any wish” into reality three times over without restriction such was his determination to return to freedom. Far lesser ambitions have been known to demand a far more exacting toll on the needy. To some degree this impacts that potency “pecking order” I discussed earlier. Ones with perceivably less to offer have to negotiate much harder for participative sex.

I think that adequately conveys the reptilian side of analysis, for now. So what of the Sirian equation? Well, atypical beliefs attempting to reconstruct what their community identities would have looked like could not be further adrift from the reptilian model. Before I divulge details on true cultural infrastructures, a background on Sirian genetic evolution is fairly vital to gain clear appreciation. According to some speculative theorists, related Anunaki “arrived” from nowhere preceding Big Bang around thirteen billion years ago. This group consisted of unique expressive statements which, though non-manifest, were each blessed with the ability of being able to form into anything they desired (though reality was limited to within ranges of their dimensional frequency bandwidth). Four billion years of evolutionary development somehow forged a split that separated all the different parts into two distinct groups. The drivers behind the contest are now remembered as Sirians (presumed to have originated from the Sirius star system), but they were called something else before. Pertinently, they have adopted many different naming identities over the eons, though for our current exercise, information is relatively unimportant. One prominent title that does spring to mind is “Catudans”. So, what is critical here is to acknowledge that the Sirian genus devalued six times from cataclysmic downgrades administered by the “almighty”. This is vital to understand when desirous to come to terms with authentic character assessment of the Catudans. I say such because, perhaps, at times, descending Sirians are unfairly “revered” by determinedly forgetful people. Poignantly, it could be argued that of all creeds and cultures, they (by cosmic reputation) have proven to cause the biggest black mark standing against independently progressive, sovereignly existential life systems.

According to varied legends [emphasized in biblical Genesis], the Anunaki divided into those that adopted the hallowed face of God from others who stayed true to classical obsidian form. Traditionally speaking, original Anunaki have mostly been portrayed as grotesque octopi with extended slippery tentacles. These notably emphasise serpentine qualities which expand a separate legacy under the dragons, of course. Topically, my favourite relatively contemporary illustration is Victorian Reverend H. P. Lovecraft’s Cthulhu, which I and others regularly refer to in reference. According to Biblical Genesis, the upgraded face of God later became synonymous with our own human image. Following the split from the wider Anunaki group, the new genus splinter, though still non-manifest, was bestowed with extraordinary power over existence and perhaps this is what inspired Genesis megalomania (implying human is God). According to related (Vedic) Scripture, our Gods preceded a reputation for wielding uncompromising haughtiness towards subordinates, enough to cause great angst against perceived lesser mortals. So, in that regard, the Anunaki split was undeniably destined, rather than simply the culmination of progressive steps which may or may not have forced radical separation. Catudan lack of diplomatic accord was so acute, attitudes did not improve to safeguard “shared” independence. Far from it. In effect their destiny was to see them morph into pious war lords; self-proclaimed pillars of endowed authority. Nevertheless, with no formal base, roots or even any territory of their own, a precarious collision course lay ahead. Their options progressing forward were logically stark. They could establish foundations supporting a territorial home either by means of plunder or negotiation.

Now, as those in the know know, history is clear about decisions made to resolve this matter. They chose the soft path of cohabitation with favourably amenable territory owners. Prediction assured, following contractual ratification, goodwill unfortunately eroded as quickly as it was prepared. Our vexatious Catudans almost immediately fell out with their flagrantly cosmopolitan hosts. Compounding ramifications from discord inevitably wound up in catastrophe, depressingly setting standards for future escapades. Track record was such that, after they initially polluted an entire galaxy, guaranteeing the exodus of all intelligent life, a robust star system was casually destroyed. Such was the fanatical hatred. Subsequent spiteful attacks that pulverized two more planets did come at a hefty price to the devil’s creed. Their uncontrollably unfair destructive behaviour caused cosmic backlash so vast, genetic downgrades were suitably significant to render the ancestors “keys” to creative existence nulled. Steps against them did not incur total impotence, because partial legacy was left intact; very much evidenced in contemporary Sirian culture. Modern day peoples are still given insight that grants them unrestricted access to the Tamarian (an inter-permeable membrane separating existence from bliss more commonly known as the Quantum Layer). Use of the energy field is currently limited to influence over atomic values. The creed is not permitted to vent acts of cataclysmic destruction any more (and had to draft reptilian technologists to assist with the botched shattering attack of moon Falla). It would seem these circumventive measures, such as outsourcing reptilian weaponry experts to their great Atlantis mega city (crushed by Falla), are the best evidence supporting truth. Sirians, of course, ironically presided over Atlantis spiritual governance, which was administered through a messianic agenda below Pleidian mer beings.

All this considered, Sirian intellect is still legendary; a fact partially affirmed by our magnificent cerebral cortex (a version of Sirian brain).

Copyright Tim Kaiser

In terms of effects, it should be emphasized that whereas reptilians draw inspiration from mood of the moment, Sirians almost exclusive gravitate around thought power. The natural conflict between these two senses of reasoning aptly relates to evolutionary human development, notably in terms of our, dare I say, mind fork. Insomuch the reptilian part of our brain (limbic system) makes snap decisions (sensationalized as fight or flight) whereas cerebral access to logic centres permits us to pontificate indefinitely over emerging life choices. Sirians, in this regard, should be remembered as master debaters; fodder of real political stock, so it is no wonder they considered themselves [pretty much exclusively] worthy of counselling over affairs of the Gods. Sadly, corrupt whim pertaining to legacy values has seen knowingly devious human authorities oversimplify considerations that used to determine what is. Past laws evidencing Sirian qualities which elevate genius (whilst aided by interpretative precision) are all but forgotten. Personally blessed with Sirian at my core, my early attempts at journalism left me dissatisfied and disillusioned. I felt my presentations were routinely full of holes, so slowly but surely articles have increased in size by anything up to fifteen thousand words per item currently. It is probably that “old stickler” attitude that caused so many relations troubles embroiled in their ancestors’ attempts at cohabitation. By reputation, I am sometimes referred to as “Mr. tough love” because my messages can be uncompromising in their dedication to truth. Clearly, I too am bestowed with those turbulent ancestral hallmarks.

Atlantis libraries of archived information collected from cosmic record were once considered the greatest “physical” source in the known universe (whilst thriving community metropoles existed). Atlantis had been historically transferred to Earth following a deal brokered with Lemurian protectorate kings. Under such auspices, Sirians were formally given Earth’s entire Northern Hemisphere (as it is known today) to relocate settlements (a consequence of catastrophe on Mars). Included in the consignment count were significant numbers of human refugees, descendants of those “rescued” just prior to a massive intergalactic conflict over Earth from around 120,000BC onwards, which later became known as the “18,000 years’ war”. Atlantis (forming “open” rural communities and “closed” civilizations protected by guarded city “towers”, such as Babel) had a two tier governance system. Grass roots’ order was negotiated bottom up through plebiscite councils that rotated political decision making authority. Virgin conceptualization of ancient Greek democracy conceivably demonstrates echoes of the earlier model. Cosmic script depicts grass roots’ order as an inverted equilateral triangle (its raised base symbolizes “the people”). In conjunction, another political bureaucracy was superimposed. Arguably continued as Babylonian and (later) Israelite scriptural governance, what passed for “the Law” had been partially based on rudiments devised by priestly Sirian clerics. Cosmic symbolism of top down order is represented by the unassuming upright equilateral triangle.

It goes without saying, when both triangles are superimposed complete authority is conveyed. Israel’s Star of David is a badge that preserves (and perhaps imortalises) the earlier governance period because it (some would contest) mockingly attempts to plagiarise Atlantean symbiosis.

There are significant differences separating Israelite and Atlantean legal attitudes. Most acutely, compared against Israelite relative austerity, Atlantis “laws” were offered only as flexible guidelines, which is not to say punishments for judge worthy offences were any less harsh. Quite the reverse was so as punitive measures against offenders located in citadels either imposed death or banishment options. Even so judgement very much relied on contextual culpability in deference to the Israelite “bell, book and candle” legacy that anchors Globalism’s modern day bureaucratic distortion geared to enslaving (or culling) culpable masses. Atlantis governing philosophy principally gravitated around Prime Law, which obliges the solitary commandment “thou shalt not oppress” [or words to the effect]. In that regard, I determine biblical rhetoric preparing for ethical sexual governance of the human “group” is a grave corruption of said Sirian wisdom. If I might be so bold to suggest one stark example; licentiousness is only ever irresponsible when it either betrays voiced expectations that define rules underlying existing loving relationships. To force inconvenience on those that are neither willing nor prepared to capitulate with law makers for spite’s sake is simply unjust. Atlantis citadel rules were fairly arbitrated, but punishment for judged infractions may seem extreme or possibly inhumane to present day people. The two choices (death or banishment) were both tragic. Executed were guaranteed ended lives. Banished would likely never see family or loved ones again. Yet, in the spirit of conscience, banishment was the normal result for convicts considered worthy of rehabilitation, while, short of extraordinary circumstances, it was never made possible for “outcasts” to renegotiate return to civilization.

Given their alien-ness, understandably, conventional Sirian sense of sexual accountability might seem odd to the average human. Insomuch, unlike reptilians (and us), they do not have capacity for lust. Sirians are also not uniform. There are three essential sexual body types. Taking all varieties into consideration, from the celestial perspective, those considered the purist have no genitalia at all. The remainder are divided into people bestowed with functional organs leaving the rest displaying body parts that are only symbolic representations of genitalia (males appear to lack testicles, or equivalent). Perhaps ancestors of these “mules apparent” had working parts, but, some way along the ascension path, equipment was no longer required for purposes of procreation (or sensual recreation). Because all Sirians are unable to behave lustfully (i.e. whilst finding sex pleasurable, lacking sex drive as we know it), neither can they appreciate the significance (less any satisfaction gained from) of fetishes or perversions. This is an essential point, because it explains why so much venom was directed at unnatural behaviours by early religions (modelling dogma on distorted Atlantis formulas). Sirians view sex as an expression of love or, better still, sex can be used as a vehicle to extend loving expressions. In this respect, there would be no limit to quantitative liaisons between people. By their standards sex is a tool that might be engaged in to strengthen relationship either between individuals or up to entire groups of merrymakers. Reptilian culture, I believe, has modelled its versions of “orgies” on Sirian best practices. Equally, Zeta grey beings have an akin strategy which involves collectives integrating brain waves to simulate enormous mutual pleasure (activities for which “all ages” can participate). Though “abductee” Suzy Hanson only makes “hints” in her book “Dual Soul Connection”, associated text implies experiences are as beneficial as erotic play.

In our domains, there have been strange science experiments designed to test whether [human] women are able to reach orgasm without any physical stimulation. These did yield positive results. Guinea pigs requisitioned unequivocally demonstrated that mundane intercourse or masturbation was not necessary to cultivate spontaneous orgasmic climax. Subjects each went through a brain (mind) scans regime. This, I would speculate, is potential evidence of latent Sirian nature embedded in our DNA (magnified in mindscape). A colleague of mine informed me recently of his girlfriend’s phantom pregnancy. In response, I quizzed, “How can you not be sure it isn’t real?” Whereas Sirians may engage in physical coupling, higher echelons achieve reproduction by means of mind alone. Others employ a combination of physical and metaphysical. Of course, those without genitalia have no other option but to channel willpower. It is here where things start to become really intriguing. Per our physiological standards, pragmatism may well persuade sexual reproduction is impossible without body functionality. However, this is not necessarily so for other entity groups, notably including Sirians and Zeta grey beings. My best example of active phenomena in human terms is embroiled in belief systems confirming the immaculate birth of Jesus Christ. Superstition maybe, but turning a blind eye to presumptive logic for a moment, could reproduction truly be possible by alternative means to the mundane?

Naturally, according to precedents established by materialist sciences, most scholars assure birth stories (which were “added” by copyrighting clerics at later dates, per classical Gnostic Problem interpretations) found in biblical New Testament legacy were “metaphorical” in character. Jesus did manage to “match” John the Baptist’s own immaculate (lust free) birth, be it under different format, so these “sane” political/allegorical form criticisms are undeniably compelling. Nevertheless, with our upgraded, enigmatic knowledge about Sirian anatomic dysfunctionality, might the same biblical texts have referred to something very adrift of normal (even if presentations were symbolic)? Might texts lay foundations for subliminal dialogue determining that Jesus was an “alien”, though produced from a fully functional human mother’s natural birth cycle? Sirians are able to embed the sense of copulation and reproduction in mind space sufficiently to emulate physical processes. Conception, per this metamorphosis, delivers energy bubbles (each potentially mimicking the womb) that “harden” (i.e, calibrating with to become physically). Venusian Sirian Valiant Thor (who infamously visited Eisenhower’s Whitehouse) conspicuously had no belly button. Development cycles are extraordinarily rapid compared to nature’s evolution. So much so, pure birth Sirians are born “adult”. Accounts surrounding Jesus are not isolated. Other resembling tales feature infant babies that appear to have been produced as crossbreeds from encounters using both human male and female stock.

Not every example of Sirian erotic interaction with humans is particularly generous. Lebanese-Australian Peter Khourey graphically claims he was left scarred after retrieving details of his experiences under hypnotic regression. Evidence found in another chronicle, that of an notorious Brazilian abductee (so much so, his name escapes me!) described a 1950’s period interaction in positive terms though. Accordingly, after intercourse with a beautiful alien woman of human appearance, her belly became translucent so he might witness the foetus growing inside her. Full gestation to birthing took only a matter of hours. When a Sirian female hosts a child, pregnancy and infant to adult development cycles are routinely supernatural, normally run over a few days. This suggests the Brazilian lawyer’s (was his name Vargas?) experience is a parallel. Another sensational report (my memory fails to specifically cite) features an infant who was miraculously quick to learn and grow, morphing into full adulthood within less than a week after conception. Reviewing the authentic Sirian experience as benchmark, refinement of individual motor skills, environmental knowledge, cultural identity still takes “as long as it takes” whether the journey begins at sub-infant or adult stage. Under oath, reptilian (human) abductees have more than occasionally talked of being transferred to “power” previously inanimate twin clones. Per their experiences, post transference, even basic actions such as walking had to be relearnt and essentially remastered.

If one could highlight how particular separators that partition sexual libidos of half-Sirian reptilians and Sirians formulate, enlightened would determine the latter firmly favour falling in love, whereas the others prefer to craft destined partnerships.

Indeed, configuration of our archaic caste system legacy (which many modern day humans consider as terminally unfair) is aptly based on reptilian organized political ideology. All their marriages are prearranged, because they do not fall in love in the same manner as humans do. They cultivate meaningful life partnerships that grow into blossoming love instead. Though cargo (i.e. offspring) may well have facilitated the initial functional purpose, reactions develop into a binding force that perpetuates romantic attachment. With respect to this, best pairing to produce marked intellectual, prodigal and hierarchical qualities in progeny is obsessively desired. Therefore, marriage partnerships traditionally dismiss satisfaction towards particular body types or glamorous facial appearance as “important”. In lieu of the natural body, reptilians have an additional advantage of being able to select a “better suited” purpose made (cloned) anatomy once reaching (their equivalent of) puberty. So if a male wanted to emulate the physique of Elvis Presley, it would be possible. Per reptilian ideology marriage is an apex of devotion, whereas [by comparison] lustful engagements merely compel the pursuit of (potentially frivolous) fun. Interestingly, because they suffer from bouts of terminal jealousy, somewhat contradicting my earlier sentiment, extra-marital relations often have to be conducted extremely discretely.

The conflict of interest (i.e. between lustful and loving commitments) is no less apparent in human nature, because of our own extended reptilian heritage. Moreover, we are blessed with the added (dare I say?) disadvantageous complication of Sirian vestige in our DNA. Explicitly, in this regard, we need to fall in love to be satisfied sufficiently to respectfully accord long term sexual fidelity. Therefore, in our case, “perfect” reflective agreements might include aspects of analogous compatibility, gravitation towards intimate magnetic passion and genuine affection for each other. This is how that reptilian and Sirian combination [in varied measure] has sown the seeds providing for human manifest sexuality. Nevertheless, it is hard to come to terms with the fact that those essentially beneficial lust worthy love ingredients perpetuating our libidos herald from one party that is unable to lust and another unable to love (in our sense of the experience). Whilst practices are deeply criticized by modern religious clerics, it is further ironical that ancient “wanton” rites devoted to attaining divine oneness is the utopian collective “harmonization of potency” per reptilian, Sirian and human physiology. In other words, we all three can appreciate and attain fulfilment through symbiotic ritual, whereas (at this elevated state), returning to God, none of us can remain independent of the sexual other.

Copyright Tim Kaiser

Though reptilians don’t “fall in love” per se, their cultural messaging is squarely behind our (to take two common examples) cupid and love heart symbolism. They can “fall in lust” when hierarchical politics doesn’t decide otherwise. Consequentially, human relationships that are based on infatuation (as is so often the case) loosely copy this model. The other preferred option for humans is normally coined “instant attraction” (that whole twin flame liturgy is a paraphrase) which amply demonstrates a reverse side (Sirian influence) of our character. Attraction can be based on anything but lust per philology defining “true love” relationships, though here lies what appears to be a giant paradox in terms. Whilst lust may well draw reptilians together, there are many hurdles to overcome for heat of passion to reach heights lofty enough to justify marriage. All partnerships follow strict matching protocols, usually stipulated and driven by in-laws. Part and parcel of human relationships configured to satisfy lustful ambition, invariably essential [partnership] compatibilities are casually overlooked on the grounds that “things will work themselves out” over time (and why possibly so many marriages end on the rocks in divorce). However, when specifically following the Sirian twin flame model, couples will regularly go to extraordinary lengths to assure there is a genuine match to ever familiar inconsistent recourse. Excessive over thinking proves as effective as throwing caution to the wind as far as enduring relationships are concerned. Both approaches are almost dead set certain to fail. It seems the best, most surefire method applied to marital longevity is a healthy balance of carrot and stick, or, to use the vernacular…push, but not that hard.

In human, reptilian/Sirian heritage plays out in topsy-turvy fashion when compared “as is” with relevant sources. Not only via failed marriages, but the precarious “balance” may explain the transitory nature of all our relationships. How many friendships last a lifetime? And when they do, is this because one, other or both parties compromise attitudes to preserve affairs? Using myself as the proverbial test subject here, of all the supposed friendships I have had, the only ones that have endured, not forsaken by time, is when communications are irregular and mostly from a distance. Every other once strong alliance of mine has broken down for one reason or another. Here is where we significantly branch away from our genetic seniors. Sirians and reptilians, for differing reasons, will go to any length to reinforce bridges. Both forces carefully circumnavigate “communal view”, so individuals, as “tribe” associates, would, short of an earthquake of malcontent, never ruffle kindred foundations because they know this would destroy concordance. To them, once their palaces of togetherness crumble beyond recognisable repair, they cease to function. Malcontented and contented (within each group) are equally marginalized as a consequence. Thus, their friendships are much more enlightened and genuinely tuned to communal responsibility than ours. Along these lines, Sirians, for instance, create mutually combined energy fields that persist lifelong.

Reptilians so heavily cherish their support networks; they make unprecedented efforts to ensure ties are everlasting. Their value added friendships must morph into wider socio-political unions as par for the course. Unsurprisingly, breakdowns of “order” can promulgate unyielding, violent wars that have devastating impact on societies. There are numbers of key components that establish spiritual heritage in the human genetic makeup. Aside from reptilian/Sirian, varied influences are open to discovery. These include Zeta, dragon, Pteroid, Lyran (fully alien to Earth) and perhaps even Mantis (via Zeta lineages). Then we have innumerable sub-sets, such as various agencies, which include Andromedans, Pajerians, Lemurians, Lumerians and other erstwhile unknown types. Naturally, with this knowledge, we can see why destiny complexity casts a shroud over all aspects of human character. Here sex is not like proverbially “riding a bicycle”. Nor do we, as spiritual beings, aptly compare with the birds and the bees. Our sexuality is a fountain that justifiably permits potent existence. So it should not be messed with, even though it invariable is. Potency, under administration of the base chakra, equates to life. Ancient wisdom knew depletion of the base chakra would eventually herald death and, insomuch, it is probably the most vital of all celestial chakra points. Reptilians and Sirians undergo extremely effective energetic recalibration regimes (mistaken for yoga) that boost all critical vortices, but of greatest focus is the one that anchors life force (which adds a further clue as to why Sirians retain impotent genitalia). Considering human heritage in this context, we too can access this life extending resource. All we require is memory to tune harmonic relativity to make necessary adjustments.

Does the Draconians’ False (Light) Matrix Leverage off the Ancient Atlantis Tamarian?

Doubtlessly many visitors here are now aware that I conduct live “light DNA” sessions via Skype. These are dedicated to pinpointing deep historic, likely extra-terrestrial origins of those that seek my advice. Established clients connect using a variety of mediums other than Skype. Some liaise with me regularly; others less frequently. One client in particular has presented many dream sequences (for me to decode). Responses are part of the continuous improvement effort and are not a feature of paid consultancy. She (the client) is invariably taken aback (and perhaps sometimes a little disappointed) by my interpretations. That is because prognoses are always pragmatic and down to Earth, as they should be. Needless to say, the causal effect rather underwhelms exquisite Sephardic (invariably dream influencing culprits) cultural fantasy that commonly obsessively overstates medieval traditions, complete with wizards, dragons, shining knights, maidens in distress and other lesser known trappings of that bygone era. Even so I am occasionally delivered news items so critical, it would be remiss of me not to expand the discovery tour with vigour and dedication for my universal audience.

One such titbit was received near the throes of completion of my last expansive writing project, or I thought it was complete at the time. The information was in fact so potent; it not only radically changed the structure of what I had planned to deliver prior (adding three extra weeks to the production cycle), but became the inspiration for this article too. It is fortunate that my interpretive skills are usually impeccable; because invariably messages from the other side are so distorted, either through general cultural incompatibility or a lack of empathetic resonance (I will discuss “empathy” separately later), that lesser mortals might sanely classify findings as “gobbledegook”. Perhaps my sources of feedback are unique to me, perhaps they are everywhere. All I can say is, I have some way (that I honestly cannot fathom) of interpreting “time” in raw state. Data, as served, is (how can I describe this?) “fixed” and, thus, extraordinarily hard to negotiate within the faculties of standardised perception. In effect, my route takes me to “the summary” of “everything”. That’s past, present and future combined as an unwieldy clump. This light vacuum (clump) is called many things, but I prefer to use the term “inherence” in cordial discussions. It could be said that it is there but not there at the same time.

My client (that delivered the message) understood she had been given her sensational truth by “Pleiadians”. This is remotely important and I will elaborate on reasons at the correct juncture. As presented, her terminology did not make any contextual sense to me or, at least, I instinctively felt that was the case then. The word she offered me was “tamaras”. Any keen eye will observe the tell-tale Anunaki “S” gives away a likely Sephardic signature rather than denoting the “plural” form or some other exotic declension. Upon first glance it seems like the vaguely recognisable (though unknown to humans) Atlantis motto tamarian. Dissimilar to English, all syllables or parts that build Atlantis words mean something individually. Group values are expansions or contextual extensions of individual meanings. If I take the English word “mailing” as the example, it can be broken in two to reveal a “verb stem” mail complimenting the “suffix” ing. Beyond telling the receiver what type of verb is being used, “ing” has no individual meaning. Thus, there are no conceptual similarities in Atlantean grammar because if “ing” was present it would need to individually mean something.

Tamaras can be broken into ta-ma-ra-s and each part naturally refers to something. My client’s interpretation of correct translation is vague, so I must return to the drawing board and approach the determination to comprehend as a detective hunts for clues from unknown “sources” to piece together a formal picture of evidential truth. My limited knowledge of ancient scripts (such as Sanskrit) is enough to glean sibylic meanings might vary so greatly, depending on how they were pronounced, a cornucopia of possibilities might thwart my efforts. Nevertheless, the honest sleuth would be able to configure an appropriate logical connection between all pieces of grouped words (such as tamaras) even from a haystack of options. “Ta” [in this instance] would need to contextually “fit” with all the other parts of tamaras to be the correct translation version of the varied possibilities.

My last writing project made a cameo out of a hypothetical Pharisee engineered plot implicating the utopian objective of controlling humanity under the banner of “Zionism”. Some symmetry may be gleaned from Sirian articulation of “justice”, so there will likely be several crossovers here. Indeed, the biblical “tower of Babel” metaphor amply demonstrates the whims of those that devote themselves to developing the interests of Zionism. Sirians at least gave the unclean “options”. Though banishment from the citadel was to precede a harsh life in the wilderness for years on end, it was better than the “living death” offered today. Our Sirian-reptilian partnership has proven to be a dangerous one. It brought down Atlantis so who would dare think otherwise? The modern “living death” condition was highlighted in my last article. Its powerful message should be contemplated deeply (it is that which is “between the lines” that shines):

“Unlike hypotheticals monstrously resurrected to become living satires by our kangaroo courts, I make no prejudgement here”

Societies have evolved into an epitome of preconceptions under synthetic regulations. To judge “on merit” is to honour. Unconditional prejudgement is a symptom of frivolous cowardice. Those devoid of any integrity choose this path. If presumptions are to be made, they must be done with fair basis to be of honourable intent, for perpetual reasoned logic blazes the avenues leading towards righteousness. Therefore we have to take care we are able to isolate preconceptions. Interpretive issues, particularly when overzealously trying to stress desired results, can easily escalate into the manufacture of falsehoods. It should be duly noted that old “basis” can and will distort new balance sheets. For instance, prior to even thinking of how to address this article, I had in mind the bare faced assumption that the Draco had somehow “defiled” that which is possibly the greatest of all ancient Atlantis legacies.  As the Draco is generally given a very negative press (something I will muse over later), it is understandable that I might occasionally (albeit inadvertently) lose grip of sound intellectual discipline. I initially erred but, given my foolish subservience to popular distortion, what’s particularly annoying in this case is the answer was right under my very nose if I had bothered to inspect the detail carefully right at the start.

I had not merely been offered a solitary bland Atlantis motto, but two very different scintillating connotations that begged for my dedicated interpretation.  After applying myself, the result was better than I could have possibly dreamt of in my wildest imagination. I had been presented the cause of all wars. “Tamaras” and “tamarian” may well look similar, but conceptual meanings are so radically different they are almost opposites. For comprehension, we must first evaluate the true relevance of the pioneering work of the great Pharaoh Akhenaten. Naturally, the real legacy of Akhenaten is so important that past evil forces have obscured anything of note from view. Censored fragments have been constructed in such a way as to distort original messages into irrelevance. Only those with access to the Akashic Records might discern fact from hapless fiction. One unlikely truth has stood the test of time though.

To the Pharisees’ dismay, historians’ consensus often favours Akhenaten’s invention of a uniform omnipresent God. Evidence of that discovery can be found in all common religious philosophies concerning the “oneness of existence”. But die-hard Pharisees still bluster ignorantly about the power of their YHWH creature (and its “unlikely” Greek etymology). The great Pharaoh knew the truth and the truth delivered us (phonetically) A-mon (although English prayer verses traditionally end A-men). Conceptually preceding Atlantis folklore “An” (A- being shorthand) has always represented the “shell” of the Almighty God. Remarkably, Babylonian annals (that roughly compare with the Jewish holy Talmud or divinely inspired oral record) are called “mo’ed”. With respect to “mo’s” positioning within “A-n”, I determine that Akhenaten (who may have lived in a much more distant past era than makes for popular conjecture) was referring to manifest spiritually as accorded by holy prosperity. The metaphor (Amon) reads something like this.

Break open the shell and you will find true divinity

Amon may have been the envy of contemporary elites seeking enlightenment, but this would have meant nothing to ordinary folks alien to intellectual passion. They needed spirit only as this is always enough to ensure the following of precise orders (doctrines) “from above”. When divine arbiters turn out in reality to be selfishly corrupt politicians, then all sorts of malfeasance can result. Even so, prosperity informs us the spirit that partners with Amon is normally called “Re” (which is an improper transliteration). Instead, it should be inscribed as “Ri” and pronounced in the same way “ray” (i.e. ray of light) is expressed in English. It highlights an essential fact. The downfall and subsequent murder of Akhenaten (whose missing body is still held by the Draco “in stasis”) coincided with a raging philosophical battle between worshippers of Amon-Ri and “Ra” (prominent sun God) occultists. Babylonian sun-worship was later rebranded Sol Invictus by the Romans sympathetic to pharisaic causes. Unsurprisingly it is the inspiration behind the Illimunati splinter aptly termed “Babylonian Brotherhood” (to which ex American President George W Bush is allegedly a recruit).

Sol Invictus (under Constantine) would assume the basis for cultural interpretation of Christianity in its final rebrand as Catholicism, so (obscured) sun-worship impacts the lives of a significant percentage of modern day populaces. In order to elevate his cult, Constantine purged all Gnostic texts that obstructed his mission. Original Druid mystery schools have been rendered obsolete (although some of that deep knowledge can be found in sections of the Jewish Kabbalah). The heinous tradition of censorship has not ceased. Dead Sea Scrolls and other significant parchments have been vetted as to not ruffle status-quo (in my opinion). Even so, a clear move away from materialistic values makes the Nag Hamadi texts essential reading. Whereas the rather obvious attempts to censor purity makes evidence against the uniform Pharisees’ cause seem “vague”, tenets of truth are impossible to blemish (ultimately availing the dedicated and allowing universal purpose to shine). Logos has not been promoted in vain and those with determination and presence of mind will find their Holy Grail.

It is no irony that the distinctive essential difference between tamaras and tamarian is found in the conflict remonstrating pedestrian belief in overt (physical) “Ra” which is opposed to the comparatively unpopular sympathetic demystification of covert (metaphysical) “Ri”. To fully appreciate how things came to be as they were in Atlantis times and as they are now, precise understanding of how the cosmos “works” is a prerequisite. Indeed, the great tyranny administered by superficial leaders ever since the fall of Atlantis is deliberately in place to confuse the masses as to what the true, purposeful properties of the heavens and underlying existences are. There is no better example to be found to signify how prominent roles were “forgotten” than by valid conceptualisation of critical philosophic differences between “Ra” and “Ri” even though some (given their programing by forces of evil) might correctly (from the empirical standpoint) argue each is “the same thing”. Others approaching the question with sensitivity would more precisely determine that “Ra” is a spiritual abomination because any perceived consolidation with divine “Ri” simply is not true. Is the sauce bottle edible? Ra has always been the device that delivers (i.e. “the deliverer”) Ri.

How am I to signify the momentous contextual differences between Ra and Ri “in laymen’s terms” in a fashion that might be appreciated universally?

The best way to start I think is to reference my last article again. That discussed various adjustments that both separated and coordinated body and mind. Here it might be observed that Ra represents the “body” of God, whereas Ri acts as divine “mind”. In that capacity, our sun (which is possibly a transplant several times removed) assumes Ra’s structured identity. Seasoned researchers should already be aware stars are not arbitrary (and otherwise useless) “inanimate objects” that happen to light our skies (in the atheistic sense). In cosmic terms, each star is a living entity no matter what the perceived status. Things actually become slightly more complicated when comprehension is tested to the limit, because each enormous orb can reproductively expand to form giant “family” networks that cover what might seem impossibly large catchment areas. Every network becomes and is an “entity” in its own right. Some networks are able to group together (assimilation and not “survival” is the fundamental principle of universal existence) and these galaxies can literally accommodate thousands of stars.

As I outline in my book The Beauty of Existence Decoded, stars fulfil the need to grow and (therefore) reproduce like any other entity.   The method they use is sadly conventional and closely copies our fungi spooring processes (or is that the other way round?). Therefore it could be said an individual sun is the equivalent of a “cell” or even a “particle” that collaborates with others to collectivise in order to become a functional body. Therefore, to call any individual cell (i.e. Ra) “the body” is nothing short of dishonesty. Capping off occultist distortion of values, in Ra’s case the roles and purposes of heavenly bodies have been so overlooked (or, rather, grotesquely twisted to suit interests of religious miscreants), they are virtually conceptually unknown. I find it ironic that the supposedly faithful have no effective parameters to refer to that will quench any thirst for raw spirituality.

Similar to the pyramidal hierarchy that is the human body, the divine mind needs a physical asset “to be” (and express itself – true “causality”). When Ra is presumed to “control” material functionality, truth has been turned inside out. The body is nothing more than a very useful vehicle. Thus Ra (in the context of sun worship) is actually evidence of the denial of mind’s role (an atypical symptom of rationalistic atheist materialism) in cognitive performance. This and other mysterious effects are the metaphysical property of spiritual domains. Consequentially, everything that thinks has a conscience-of-sorts. The mind is not illusory steam. Indeed, the reverse is so for after brain service ceases, the mind carries on. Conscious being is eternal whereas the body and all its parts are a semblance tuned to a specific dimensional paradigm.

It needs no great detective to deduce the Ra concept is something the Pharisees would greatly appreciate. Did not Moses begin the conquest to undermine God’s spirituality when he issued the original “commandments”? In addition to their bias towards stockholders, all ten either encourage denial of truth or open deceit. His “God” seems to expect compliance in the same way medieval torturers “validated” confessions. Though it has not been historically confirmed (largely due to that grand legacy of misinformation), it would not surprise me if it turned out that, prior to the formulation of Judaism, the Pharisees were the original usurpers directly after the fall of Atlantis. Were these the “Hyksos” (reinvented as Babylonian dynasts in the “official” historic account) or some other version attached to the Varangian Guard? Incorporating Akhenaten’s “universal God” into their folklore was more than theft. The Jewish YHWH judgemental aberration is devoid of conscience. It is pitched as the ultimate authority for authority’s sake. The “cause” has promoted doctrines that are as childish and spiteful as they are desperately unfair. No wonder man, according to religious texts, appears so much more eloquent and morally just than the remotely holy.

Jealous, selfish man would not exceed expectation was he to be classed as a spiritual imp. Yet he dares to dictate to God?

The Pharisees ignore and deny the essence of God. All manners of evidence to the effect can be sought in our material sciences, nominal religious dogmas and the endless commercial-political conspiracy designated to prepare slaves. Ri is the glue that binds existence, but spirituality also inhibits the Pharisee’s cause. Nevertheless, comprehension of the censored astral is critically important if the Atlantis tamarian concept is to be appreciated. There is no representation for spiritual glue in the word “tamaras” and for good reason. On face value tamaras is the product of manipulators that desire to use the shell (Ra) as their icon for control. It goes without saying that the tamaras must fashionably double as that which is colloquially known as the “False [light] Matrix”. Albeit the former signifies philosophic intent and the latter refers to proto-physical infrastructures, they are the same. In relation to the tamarian however, all concepts leverage off the same basic identify framework in different ways.

Fortunate for us Atlantis expressions “evolve” and we can clearly see tamaras and tamarian have shared components. Therefore once we are able to decode all syllables as individual standalone words, we will be in a stronger position to impress plausible grouped meanings that contextually rely on all parts. This quest needs some vital background before we embark. For instance, our contemporary sciences’ impotence regarding cosmic matters will reflect poorly on findings (i.e. findings will likely contradict or defy mainstream opinion). Scientists’ errors are so widespread that everything particularly very small or very big is disaffected. The removal of Stephen Hawkins will change nothing. In my protest, I see no purpose in attempting to benchmark findings under error to be “politically correct”, so I rightly ignore whimsical physicists. Atoms, I reveal in The Beauty of Existence Decoded, are universal catalysers. In that capacity, all the components of dimensional frequency configurations are simultaneously generated within “time windows”. No quantum theory has come close to unravelling the “mystery” behind the truth beyond string and superstring “anticipations”.

This must be appreciated before broaching the discovery tour as the tamaras and the tamarian equally leverage off the quantum layer; which is (contrary to mainstream physics opinion) an infinite ultra-manifest mesh that does much more than merely completing existence. All atoms must be suitably matched to connect which, by that determination, excludes “nothing”. There is an illusory void which satisfies the requirement to punctuate the dynamics of electro-magnetism but true “nothingness” is not part of existence and that is why neither tamaras nor tamarian make mention of it. The quest to decode terms has not been straightforward by any means. My reticence to benchmark findings against flawed, bloviating sciences also removes consistency, so I have to be careful. Terms have proved impossible to compare against anything that categorically justifies their correctness. Even so intuitive faith will provide logos when administered sincerely.

The legacy that was the Atlantis language has been completely lost (or perhaps violated) and this is why historians “question” the very existence of associated ancient civilisations. Was it not for Plato, I wonder if anyone would bother even to hunt for mythical lands. Thus all I can confirm (from inherent truth sources) is the peoples of Atlantis used numerous scripts (as is the way today) because they originated from different locations and cultures. However meanings were congruous because only one language free of dialects was synthesised by the numerable occasioned alphabets, so oral “Chinese” could be understood by English and Ethiopians alike. Scripts represented the sole common language. It was only after the fall of Atlantis that cultural divergence led to the erosion of prior common word meanings and scripts became contextual languages in their own right. This breakdown is “celebrated” by the Pharisees under auspices of the “Tower of Babel” account in the Bible. Their unsung great coup was to manufacture universal ignorance amongst men with the view to ultimately groom “world leaders” in their image.

Earthly sources have fortunately (and perhaps a little fortuitously) shed some light on our conundrum (i.e. how to decode two unknown and erstwhile obsolete Atlantis concepts?). Unbeknownst to common ancestors, many modern day languages with deep historic origins still maintain a little of the magnificence of the former great civilisation. Logic persuaded that answers would be found in Sanskrit, yet fate had other plans for me. By a strange coincidence, the syllables I needed to translate were remarkably alive and well. Everyday notations of missing parts were present in Maori tribal scripts. Cultural meanings only needed to be slightly adjusted to bring clarity to the discovery quest. Perhaps this New Zealand coincidence is not as startling as might be first considered. The Maoris were the only nationals that effectively stood up against the tyranny of [British] Imperialists. That legacy is fearsomely coveted by modern populations as it should be.

There were no isolated syllable “stand alone” meanings to be found. By example, tapu (ta-pu) is a sacred ceremonial dagger. “Ta” to my frustration always seemed to be connected to other components (such as “pu” in tapu’s case). I feel sure that Sanskrit might reveal unembellished values for all syllables, but I have no more than a quaint appreciation of the language. Even so, there is a good broad base to work from and I have also collected some obvious “foundation stones”. We have already reviewed “Ra” and “Ri” at some length. “An” (almighty God) is another. Explanations need to work “individually” and within “group formats”. Therefore “Ta” in likely correct context would mean “sacred”. “Ma” similarly converts to “life force”. Emphasised earlier, “S” implies the wave or flowing current of existence (sometimes metaphorically expressed as “oceans of space”). It further marks the divide of Yin Yang. According to Robert Morning Sky, ‘S” was the most ancient representation of what I regularly term “Anunaki”.

It is interesting that the Hebrews (under the Pharisees) dropped traditional “An”, replacing it with the abomination YHWH. Understandably (given the Pharisees’ puppet status below the Sephardim) An is also missing from “tamaras” and this should be enough to propose a definite link between Ra occultists, the Pharisees “laid bare” and those reptilian master planners that cautiously offered my student “advice” correlating with the theme of this essay. Pharisees’ (or “those who censor truth”) blasphemy doctrine attempts to abolish (or, at best, deny) manifest spirituality (“Ri”). YHWH is painted as a mortally biased, divisively unfair despot, because so are they too. In adjunct to their distortion of order, nature’s cycles are deemed to precipitate plausibly measurable patterns or, to put it a better way, cycles must conform to man’s mathematical calculations defining “responsible thresholds”. When this is not so, religious malfeasants sympathetic to the Pharisees’ utopian cause determine God (i.e. nature is merely an “extension” of Ra’s body) has been “infected by forces of evil” (because God himself “cannot err”).

Why does the fact Sun worshipers revelling in the cycle of life followed dreadful (pointless) superstitions (such as blood sacrifices) when cycles appeared to “break” shock? A Catholic Priest can still conduct an “exorcism” today. How is that any different? We may well currently have an atheist-materialist “globalism” culture superimposed over everything else, but modern day Pharisees are identical (in character) to prominent historic memories of them. Times have changed yes, but attitudes are still as rotten as ever. The Sephardim (guides to my student) love to lever ignorance particularly when encapsulated by “rationalism” (i.e. error or “babble” is formularised as proto “truth”). Superstitions, peculiarly potent in this current stale faux science state of apathy, make absolutely brilliant decoys to parasite off. The best ones to manipulate are those that “believe” they know it all. Widely publicised, I agree that the balance of “life energy” is very important to our invisible overseers, but I do not necessarily concur with popular prognoses for motive.

For instance, the psychotic imposition of “paedophilia” as the root of all evil is an obvious reptilian measure against humanity. It is a psy-op that leverages off the guilt and greed of motherhood. They want to cultivate an impotent youth. That’s their motive. Mothers desire unrequited power, so the psy-op is a brilliant manoeuvre and a “win/win”. To cap it off reptilians have been able to cultivate harmless, moronic human slave populations that are so whimsically spineless they support their tyrannous leaders austere agenda with open arms. Down trodden young are the easiest to influence. Once traditions are set, they are almost impossible to shake. George Orwell remarked on how quickly intellectuals were ready to fall under McCarthy’s fake communism “threat” (one of many successful attempts made to prohibit reason). Nothing has changed. In fact the state of deceit has soured to such a degree that scientists and other so-called “professionals” leave their ethics and integrity at the work gate. Reptilian will to win (“survival”) has sacrificed dignity.

The covert conflict between tamaras and tamarian has converted to human civilisations and this predetermines the prevalence towards “will to win”. Up to this point, I have only outlined meanings of each part of the two concepts.  Once full understanding is complete, evolution of human history and its underlying course of clandestine manipulation will become clearer. In that regard, put as simply as possible, tamarian literally translates as “the sacred life force which is the divine will of almighty God”. Tamaras, it could be said devalues this message in the following way “the sacred life force is the image of God which is represented by the exalted manifestation (Anunaki)”. In other words, Ra sun [God] is an idol which is the image of the Anunaki. Per these terms, illusory reality assures the life force is made “sacred” by simply manifesting. In the most contradictory fashion, the tamarian espouses true life force cannot be solid. It is something on the lines of “the mind” and the reason this is sacred is it upholds “God’s will” (or desire).

It could be argued that the tamaras implies the “physical” is the extent of everything or “God in being” (Elohim) even though it is a flexible feature of atomic frequency calibration, whereas the tamarian fails to acknowledge the relevance of “illusory existence” beyond fulfilling the instance of God’s will. This is why the Gnostics (who attempted to preserve Atlantis folklore, symbolised by the fish which represents Pleiadian Oannes) expressed creation in such alien terms. Mundane science is all but forfeited in the casting of non-physical states (majestic, graceful and so on) as the root cause behind prolific generation of “open” logical or emotional responses depending on situated “needs”. Per that equation, physical clutter has the dual metaphorical role of constantly amplifying meta-physical purpose.

Before I expose the prank the Sephardim have played on humanity’s insolence, it would best to explain what is truly meant by “the sacred life force which is the divine will of almighty God”. Beyond crass iconography and accompanying superstitions, “God” is sorely absent from general religious vision. I won’t dwell on the obvious, but what is important is God’s absence reinforces belief in superstitions (regularly tailored to suit group “agendas”) in those that are gullible enough to succumb to fantasies under the misconstrued objective of being “faithful” (i.e. I tell you something and, for you to be “faithful”, you must unconditionally believe what I say without adequate supporting evidence or provocation). There is a concrete reason for God’s supposed absence that would stun habitual atheists. There is also valid rhyme as to why divinity is hidden from laboured sight. The key to truth and accrued wisdom is always found in inspection of the detail. More detail reveals greater clarity (and that is the main reason why “religion” twists the metaphor, comparing detail to “the devil”). That is why miscreant “powers” feign [lies, damned lies and] statistics and generalities as “evidence” (sic) of truth. They (who bankroll all religions) do this to deliberately and mischievously circumvent detail and deny disaffecting logic.

Perhaps they are aware of the problem, perhaps not, but God can only be seen in absolute detail or not at all. Therefore disquieting logic dictates that omnipotence is the whole quantum layer which, in part, appends locational physicality (or, rather, summarily “points to” denoting physical localities that offer “windows” within perceptive interpretation). Suffice to say; though the quantum layer isn’t physical, it can be made so by leveraging frequency generated perception within certain astral bandwidths (or sub-astral bandwidths). Truth and knowingness is set apart from causal effects as these transcend perception and are beyond calculated fabrication. In fact that which is classed as “reality” is done so for perceptive convenience and that rather hinders any meaningful quest to “find God” or true truth. In association, the Atlantean use of the term “tamarian” was in direct reference to the quantum layer and, most significantly, the atomic resonance or “flux” effect which signifies “balanced” divine will. Imbalance in flux will lead to states of general disharmony right the way up to nuclear incidents (which impact the full astral spectrum and are not merely limited to this reality plane).

Catastrophic events permeate all the way up the astral ladder

In my last article I introduced a mysterious enclave of humanoid aliens who had been residing on the Spanish mainland in the 1950’s. Their information legacy proves they (“Ummos” is an affectionate nickname that is now commonly used to identify the “type”) were authentic. From this record, they most significantly classed only ten dimensions (that bear no relation to the mathematical irrelevance that posits reality symptoms width, breadth, depth have dimensional qualities). Seven of these fundamental bandwidths were aeons or “base states” of God, which are also sometimes referred to as the seven heavenly (astral light) states. Logic persuades that, “in order”, they would occupy positions three to nine up the astral ladder. Dimension ten would be the culmination of everything; a repository of “raw time” that permanently sits “in the present”. That leaves dimension one and two and deduction impresses these are configured “dark light” holographic universes. In case anyone misses it, here I inadvertently (lol) identify plausible reasons for foreboding over the so-called “ascension” of man.

In light of this, it seems to me that our material reality plane is most likely hosted in the lower of the two dark dimensions. If ascension rumours prove valid, we are on the cusp of our bandwidth and will make the necessary imminent transition to “Tara” when the tamarian executes relevant changes in our DNA (delivered by the tamaras). Though the effect will be a technically spiritual evolution, man will have no comprehension of naked “epinoa” (which is commonly disfigured by dishonourable religious bluster) in motion. That which comes from God aligns with logic, truth and knowingness and this is why creative talent is pure. For God, there is no “best way”. There is only “the way [that works]” (which may mean infinite numbers of possible routes between A and B that could reduce upon “specific intentions”, such as “I need to travel between identified points within an hour”).  God’s intent is definitely not a predisposition towards group lobotomy for the sake of order or “love” (sic).

“Morality” in fact is largely the cancer of spirituality

Tamarian identified that the collective atomic flux acts as though it was “God’s skin”. Each individual atom might be (contextually) compared to a pore. This means the canopy can be perceived (and used or manipulated) from various standpoints. Conceptually it is much more than the arbitrary “atheistic” top down, bottom up reflexes that have been differently touted by mainstream science and religion. For instance, there are numerous cyclic complimenting partnerships (such as those that become physical objects) which have been purposefully etched out of the main framework. Whereas the tamaras divides (in typical Pharisaic terms) “spiritual” and “physical”, the tamarian places the spiritual as the hidden anchor that permeates motivated existence. In other words, the Atlanteans recognised purpose exudes vitality and not vice versa. Here we are brought face to face with the key flaw with tamaras’ Ra worship.

In their management of humans, the Sephardim view latent ability or talent as something akin to superfluous. In that regard, they place as much necessity for “inferior” (and unspiritual) beings to be [blindly] “enlightened” by God (Ra) as those with normal or better than normal receptive faculties. To all intents and purposes humans are little more than fodder to be processed by them. Their approach strangely observes the “socialist” opinion that that which cannot be approached from humble grounds of understanding is not understood (i.e. because humans are incapably of empathy, what’s the point in developing true spiritual mandates?). Whether content is simple enough to facilitate universal understanding doesn’t alter the truth. By their own reasoning, the unspiritual are also incapable of worshiping Ra. Courses are undeniably designed to pressgang congregations into paying tribute (more “torture”).

According to the Atlanteans, the thinking being (separated from “animals”) covets an evolving, deliberate mind. Conversely, Draco Sephardim (given their subtle but obvious mandates in our realms) would argue that all life was locality “crafted” beneath the manifest version of God (Ra). Per this concept, knowing one’s place or station in life (in respect to that version of the divine) precedes “purposefulness” (or “usefulness”). Those that defy their chosen (for them) route dishonour God (check out the “values” of austere Tibetan Buddhism and the tale of the man who had his eyes removed for daring to attempt to emigrate from his homestead sometime in the 1960’s). Differences between “thinking beings” and animals are rendered invalid (under these terms) beyond competent definition of hierarchical chains of command. In fairness to the Draco Sephardim, without Pleiadian ability to alter the frequency of atoms, man is pretty much restricted to “his lot” and that rarely goes beyond birth right and all those relating casual connections.

Also (and courtesy of the Pharisees, of course) unaware human beings have more or less completely succumbed to the tamaras. Ra may well be scorned by morons today, but his attitude decidedly presides over that universal conscience of man in just about every respect. Differences between thinking beings and animals have become so remote it is though they are no more. General belief is that if animals were given the ability to communicate, they would (with correct education) adopt the human “value base” (the monster that summarises Pharisaic programming) one way or another. Given proscribed ethics are largely (if not entirely) the product of whimsical indoctrination, was an “animal” to transform into an intelligent being, there is little doubt that the “powers” would do everything in their range to “fix” it too (perhaps hinted at in George Orwell’s Animal Farm).

We must go beyond the obvious eye to come to terms with the splendour that is the tamarian. My last article highlights that the importance of atoms passes by unnoticed for just about all scientists and amateur enthusiasts alike, even though “string” and “superstring” theories have the potential to spearhead truth. Figuratively, the “informed” know that particles have the constitution to make infinite replicas of themselves (displaced by time and space). Atoms, I state, are an integral part of spirituality. Souls are the collaboration of atomic will. In fact to be more precise and to paraphrase my book The Beauty of Existence Decoded, every atom conveys a “soul” window. Pyramid hierarchies attempt to “point” the body along best of breeds’ individual spiritual courses. Atlantis leaders (version six of the genetic template) knew this but they were also not human. Today that species group is colloquially known as Sirians (heralding from Sirius). However, there are numerous races under the DNA umbrella which notably include our celebrated Pleiadian amphibians. Mer-people (almost certainly doubling as “Oannes”) were instrumental at demonstrating how the tamarian can be positively drawn off to empower life within functional Atlantis society (and possibly even on Mars too).

“Human” was created as a cooperative of hybrids (we have many different types which are evidently mostly beyond the vision of the corporate funded ‘Genome Project”) formulated (in part) from Sirian DNA. Thus, it does not require the rocket scientist to consider the likelihood that embers of latent Pleiadian DNA lurking in our gene set is “the cause” behind overzealous promotion of fantastical belief systems that literally aim to “force” make-believe into being. Ironically in fact, in a sense what the Pharisees are doing with their Zionist agenda crudely attempts to replicate some of the great Pleiadians achievements which culminated in their cultivation of “reality states”. There are naturally critically distinct differences in approaches and I will explore the Zionist methodologies in more detail when I focus on the tamaras.

To simply summarise now, the Pleiadians coordinated uniform sovereign will to ensure group ambition encompassed civilised society in entirety, whereas Zionist “shepherds” deliver threats of fear or reward as coordinated “incentives” for their sheep with the ideal of ultimately forcing peak body order over their cultivated civilised flock (which by designation is transformed into “the great group” per the euphemism peace on Earth). Pleiadian consciousness was built on the principle of “commune” which had to cater for the will (or wishes) of every individual or fail. Conversely, Zionism’s “expendable individual” concept reduces necessity to “only those that support the great group”.

Naturally Pleiadian culture became a major benchmark for Atlantis societal ambition and the taramian features heavily in [now mostly obsolete] cultural lore. A parallel “justice” mechanism (that focused on causes of disorder and not merely evident symptoms) did aim to putty any cracks (as deemed) in social conscience.  Justice then was different in structure to the modern Zionist tyranny over conscience and spirituality. Even so, the two methods are at least conceptually compatible and insomuch neither work. This is because “order” (however well-reasoned and logically directed) either reinforces or challenges dignity. Because “taste” is spectral, all “specific” laws are doomed to defend causes at the expense of certain demeanours. By way of remedy, Gnostic “Christians” (the original Druids) attempted to rekindle some of those forgotten Pleiadian ideals (which incidentally suggests to me that Judaism “broke in two” after Akhenaten’s defeat and that is why his Babylonian status has been fabricated in order to obscure real political intrigue of the time, covering up relevance to modern day standards all the while).

It also suggests that Judaism and “apostate” Jews’ history spans at least ten thousand years. Akhenaten’s immediate followers would become the original Gnostics (though the mission only formularised around 300BC – a time of great political upheaval) and they were the ones prepared to battle against Pharisaic Ra occultists. Whilst modern day orthodox Jews would be mostly inclined to deny obvious plausibility of a deeper history than tradition permits, they are unable to hide from the conspicuous evidence of Pharisaic double dealing from the time records begin. Duplicity (bearing false witness) is also perceived to underscore power and that formally implicates long lines merchant bankers (who later became known as infamous Levite “industrialists”). In fact anthropology has an even bigger problem. The current scope of intelligent man changing from “moron” to “genius” allows no time, no evolutionary path for transition.

Did human proudly spawn ochre graffiti on cave walls or was this the out pouring of Neanderthal ape?

Popular depictions may show no evidence of the fact, but (and as mentioned earlier) Pleiadians associated with Atlantis were aquatic or, in other words, “mer-people”. Nommo amphibious, hermaphrodite Gods of Dogon myths, Hermes/Poseidon from the Greek/Roman legends perhaps is all that remains of the Earthly account. Whether tales are related or not is unimportant. Messages contained within ancient chronicles were “transcendental”. Would it not be ironical if it turned out that the Atlantis’ great spiritual centre was in the very same region now occupied by the Sphinx and Great Pyramid of Giza? Thousands of years ago the Middle East was extraordinarily fertile and wet. Geological evidence informs much of the Sphinx was submerged under water for a long period; long enough to be home to the Pleiadian sages? This also adds credence to beliefs in distant past underwater civilisations. But, to avoid creating confusion, I should mention that there are also numbers of non-aquatic Pleiadian varieties (or should I say races?) that arguably go all the way up to “heavenly body” status. Whether any of these had any association with Atlantis’ residents is open to discussion.

I can confirm sea visitors still regularly come to our oceans. It is unclear if these are descendants of Atlantis, but the notion is plausible.  It does suggest the “gulf oil spill” may have been a direct attack on their infrastructure, in my opinion. For those that still believe the catastrophe was an “accident” (sic), go discover how the local stock market sufficiently predicted the event and payed out healthy well-timed insurance to the important folks that owned the physical assets. Gordon Duff’s bizarre ravings about a fourth dimensional war over the oceans being waged between the US navy and non-specific extra-terrestrials is an extension of this but (equally) should be considered an “unlikely” overall scenario. Sonar “pings” that regularly sensationally interrupt sea life navigation systems have been counter-neutralised by intelligent entities located within their catchment range. The “big picture” is fairly significant as numbers of different entity types use our seabeds. Even so none (to my knowledge) have “colonised” or could be regarded as permanent residents in the strict sense. It would be reasonable to at least postulate that some or maybe all establish communications with view to mutually collaborative exchanges.

I have been led to believe that the main reason they have set up on the sea floor is, and I quote”, “we (humans) can’t get at them there”

Atlantis leaders could change atomic values to the frequency needed for gold simply by using their minds. Pleiadians took this a step further but their efforts were in no way comparable to Catholic-New Age “Cosmic Christ” tradition. Feigning commune by attempting to force (impose) universal “love” (or, rather, soft austerity dressed as “love”) is a barefaced Zionism “tactic”. Perhaps predictably, the Catholics (who invented Cosmic Christ) are the end product of a long winded pharisaic domination of Gnosticism. Possibly ignited by the infiltrator St Paul, the determination towards “bell, book and candle” dogmatisation in deference to faith has crafted a reflectively causal “group consciousness”. Tamarian, we have learnt, is the endless atomic mesh that underpins connectivity of everything. For instance, acupuncture and (to some degree) hypnosis is made possible by it. It cannot be avoided, so ignorance as a weapon is the most probable strategy used by deniers.

Atoms (as far as this dimensional reality goes) are inflexible windows that we, for our part, are “trapped” in (per the rules of the illusion). Or this is what materialists would have us believe. The mind, according to those heathens, is nothing more than a reality symptom. Cosmic Christ should be renamed Cosmic Mind for the program attempts to synthesise a group thought pool. The Pleiadians did it properly. Coercion, they knew, would ultimately be met with resistance, and resistance meant the end of any commune. Only by harnessing a compatible, non-conflicting group identity could communism succeed. Once the sense (or framework) of commune had been established it was possible to reconfigure atoms as the means towards cooperative wishes. It became possible (within certain parameters) for those parties involved to literally will their way in life.

It could be said the tamarian and tamaras signify faith versus control approaches to vital reality. Peiadians, by definition, had faith in the knowledge that atoms would comply with their desires because they observed the will to be. Conversely, the Sephardim (reptilian ‘Gods”) are firmly behind the tamaras for opposite reasons. Nevertheless, as vaguely effervescent accounts of reptilian character are invariably presented in ways geared to sensationalising for sensation’s sake, “purpose” is reduced to the narcissistic human abuse cycles offering “victimhood” as the great prize. Consistent messages regurgitate blood thirsty, unfair abductors preying on poor little unsuspecting, God fearing humans for “sport” over and over. Logic is so adrift of truth, I sense the Pharisees have a hand in the manner information is being presented. They, after all, own the popular mainstream and alternative views for by “backing” both sides, success is guaranteed.

I have written extensively on the real motive behind supposed human “abductions” and accompanying ceremonies. Actual flaws of reptilian libido can be clearly seen in their devotion to regulations which are symptoms of their determination to control. Grafting “order” on society is the summary effect. It is also important to highlight their societies do not recognise that which is the epitome of pharisaic idealism – “survival of the fittest”. Reptilians know survival is merely a natural effect of living existence; a symptom of life. True blueprints use template formulated assimilation as the predominant creative device. As I explain in this article, where permitted, Ciakars absorb their victims by means of fusing mind, body and soul. Master and servant become united as a single entity which is made more powerful by the strength of the bond. “Victims”, in these cases, must be willing.

To reptilians, humans are generalised as low caste, unsophisticated “underlings” that need discipline. The tamaras is the fundamental vehicle used by them to ensure their execution of discipline over us follows a program. Sirians do not function well under laws and there lies the contradiction in conflict for part Sirian, part reptilian human. Proponents supporting human corridors of power are definitely tweaked to promote reptilian mindset, because to suggest otherwise would be absurd (considering the weight of evidence supporting an ongoing, without end pharisaic conspiracy to control). Far from being conspiratorial in their ambition, Sephardic overlords apply logical rule of law configurations via political equilibriums (affirmed by all historic data) governing the body of humanity because they presume they are executing God’s will.

Humans are part reptilian and were created by the Sephardim and this adds to their cause. What if it was the other way round? They would let their quarry roam wild, “unattended” like recalcitrant lambs? I have explained the origins of man many times before, but here’s the micro-version. “Snake” euphemises the Ciakar (in biblical Adam and Eve). Ciakars are renowned both for their remarkable cunning and their chameleonic camouflage ability. Sephardim is the most genetically advanced Ciakar physical form (which is now located too far adrift from our reality bandwidth to manifest in normal state) and they became the direct creators of human beings (which are versions of much earlier cumbersome Neanderthal). Mundane analysis of amino acids disguises the fact that our creation and partnership with our creators was much more than merely blood matching. Testament to truth came recently when the female student of mine associated with this article recalled to me a startling but acutely perceptive observation she had made.

“Ciakar is a mispronunciation of chakra”

Anyone that has visited Thailand should be aware of the customary expression “Farang” routinely used to address white skinned “foreign” visitors by the natives. This is because the very first Caucasians that attempted to colonise were from France. Farang was the closest the Thai palate could come naturally to configuring the word with ease. Ken Bakeman, Eva Draconis and others have observed problems in reiterating reptilian guttural pronunciation. If Ciakar is indeed the mispronunciation of chakra, the news would make eternal good sense, because the “commonality” between them and us is found in “paired” energy fields. It would also mean chakras must act as the “communication bridge” between those located outside our reality plane (a different light frequency). Chakras are the congestion points of atomic bandwidths that operate similarly to other astral highways. Drawing on the astral link is the way reptilians “access” us.

This is an extraordinarily important piece of information, because it completely redefines our understanding of physical health. Fundamental “causes” of all illness are the result of an imbalance or imbalances of the ectoplasm energy field. The ectoplasm is divided up by chakras and they become barometer measures that divine trouble with relevant body functionality (which is an effect relating to the cause). I have mentioned before on my other website that Pasteur’s germ theory (an industrialist “survival” scam) is entirely wrong because the body primarily attempts to assimilate anything that goes into it (following existential creation). That which cannot be assimilated, such as processing worthy “toxins”, are reduced to waste or, if impossible to process, cloaked/contained.

Energy fields (ectoplasm) are located beyond time and space even though apparent physical “light” presence may contradict that truth. Depending on how it’s conceived, an individual field can theoretically extend to the far reaches of the universe. On our superficial “reality” plane it may only occupy radials spanning a few dozens of metres out from the centre. Therefore, within the proximity of a commercial building, for instance, it is likely all workers’ ectoplasms overlap. Each individual sub-conscious feeds off the other (inter-connected ectoplasm) and then chakras implement the effects, whether positive or negative. Consequentially if one is ill, all become ill reflecting the higher body state.

Disease is spread by out-of-alignment chakras

It is also courtesy of the chakras why the Sephardim feel intrinsically connected to dear old human (similar to the fashion a shepherd becomes responsible for his sheep). By extension, they believe the tamaras gives them “divine tools” to directly interfere in the affairs (politics) of man. If they were acting figuratively out-of-line, would not God retaliate by smiting them from existence for eternity?  Was I to argue tamarian is God “the cause” then tamaras would be the utopian “symptom” of divinity. From the authoritarian perspective, man (or, more precisely, human) is the lowest rung of a long line of “supplants” that form extended (though hidden) hierarchical chains of command all the way up to “God”. I use “God” in inverted commas here because the philosophic outline concerns levels of manifestation and definitely not omnipresent “oneness” (which happens to be the predominant feature of the tamarian). The genetic chain I refer to consists of “Anunaki” bloodlines which would raise Ra (the sun God) as their “highest state”. Worship, per knowledge of progressive bloodlines all the way up to God, is not a choice. It is a rite and those that refuse to capitulate or deny faith insult “the ultimate creator” per said opinion. That is the Sephardic view on this and the Jews were not labelled Sephardic (“chosen”) peoples accidentally.

So the Pharisees (whether they individually realise it or not) do actually fulfil God’s bidding or, rather, cooperate with the Sephardic interpretation of that philology. Putting aside the deceit that has become the style of modern “sciences”, hallmarks of this tradition (no matter which time period is considered) stand out like “dog’s balls” wherever they are noted. Branding citizens under “the flag”, passport control, forced labour, regulated workplaces and on and on are all their measures. Versions of fundamentalism are conspicuously built around differing interpretations of aggregated symptoms. For our age, for example, the metaphysical is (at best) marginalised and most mostly denied, so fundamentalism is not merely restricted to data interpretation.

Everything calculated must be perceived to be physical or it does not “exist” and (laterally) has no impact on theories generated to resolve equations. Romans and many other ancient cultures revered nature’s cycles; a very different approach to the modern condition. So when abundance appeared to “break”, reason persuaded the “overall creator” was protesting at abuses (humans that behaved “unnaturally”) against the system (nature). This prescient philosophy is found as a significant value base determining all modern laws (even though science, on occasions, seems at loggerheads). The concerted attempt to purge all possibility for supposed unnatural behaviours (remonstrated by Catholic St Paul and other good Levites) surely aims to reduce the human to “automaton” (under Ra) status. Laws support the Ra concept to the hilt.

It is not widely known (even in alternative circles specialising in the paranormal) that the sun remotely “washes” our DNA (in the atomic format). Therefore the belief in Ra cannot simply be shrugged off as wilful superstition. In fact at least three sources persistently alter our DNA. The sun (material black light), we are told, issues a bi-product called vitamin D which is needed for survival. Few would acknowledge the inner [invisible – celestial white] light source is the one (when performing in isolation – free of sunlight) that triggers our production of melatonin. Sephardic Draco attempt to limit the effects of melatonin as much as possible, for all “alien DNA change-agents” are seen as “contraveners of the wishes of Ra”. In order to block external forces, they created a third light source. Assisted by other worldly technologies, our moon recycles amplified sunlight (is “madness” a side effect under special conditions?). Though this does not close the loop (so to speak), it does assure there is very little opportunity for any life form to detach from Ra’s influence for significant periods. One of the stark consequences is our inability to empathise.

The word empathy (in its modern use) is actually a distortion. As it is used today, empathy is contextually no different to sympathy beyond the presumption that to second guess something equates to understanding or, dare I say, implies reliving someone else’s experiences. Unless you can literally be what you claim to empathise with [regularly highlighted when uncomfortably confronted by others’ bereavements], you cannot empathise at all. However, qualities humans’ lack, the Pleisdians thankfully have in abundance. In this capacity, they have the insight to appreciate everything from the objective standpoint.  Were circumstances to justify efforts, they can even appreciate detestable acts. Humans, conversely, instinctively despise everything they detest. Researching extensively on this subject, I have yet to meet a truly objective human being; one that can “love for love’s sake” for instance. Humans are naturally vain and self-centred so “objectivity” is invariably simply an extension of selfish individuality. Standard honest responses to any given scenario might look like “I approve because I can do that” or “I disapprove because I would never do that”.

The closest a human will come to mimicking objectivity is through the use of transference. If we are not exclusively subjective, why are there numerous and constant wars that erupt at every waking opportunity invariably pitched against the most trivial of resolvable complaints? Transference is a technique whereby the subjective “assumes” (or presumes) feelings for something drawn from its catalogue of deemed “relative experiences”. Taking the theme of bereavements as the case study, the subjective might compare its experiences surrounding the death of a beloved pet bunny called “Floppy” (for instance) to “relate to” the agonising anguish of the objective that happens to be mourning the loss of (shall we say) a favourite uncle. Multi-lateral appreciation (to appreciate for appreciation’s sake as though it was an extension of core being) has gifted the Pleiadians with the genius credentials to evolve into something truly empathetic. Genius is merely the spark the fires the determination to journey. Therefore nothing is born with the power of empathy.

Ability is something that must blossom from experiential evolution

Acceleration of evolution bestowed the powers (and genetics) that the Pleiadians needed to manage the tamarian effectively enough to create their own balanced universalism paradigm. Maybe a consequence of our reptilian “survivalist” nature, unfortunately this is something we could never do. Perhaps the Gnostics (behind ancient Tibetan folklore too?) were forlorn in their efforts to rekindle Atlantis spirit, but they tried with heart, body and mind. Emphasised by ancient druidic practices (mostly obsolete today), they were true communists (no relation to industrial Marxism) in so much as their efforts supported the utopian goal towards mentored universal equality. As an aside, this suggests the four “gospels” of the New Testament Bible have all been “fixed” by parties unsympathetic with communistic practices. Even the so-called “gentile” gospel (Luke) compares the social status of a Syro-Phoenician (Syrian) woman as lower than a common household mutt.

Caste systems and royal progeny are classical symbols that emphasise reptilian philosophy endorsing the tamaras as the staple for natural order. Given priorities of pharisaic Zionism encompass fostering patriotism (below caste systems that elevate a nouveaux meritocracy), family planning, enforcing social status, either isolating or blending cultures, Russian bastardised “Communism” (sic) was indisputably one of their grand operational initiatives. On one hand living circumstances were very good (heavily subsidised rents, free utilities). That’s why an irrepressible exodus of Jews flooded into Russia particularly after Brezhnev announced his five year plan. Infrastructures in place allowing connection with those outside (foreigners) were very, very bad. People with larger than average families were not provided for and, consequentially, less was deemed better. “Free enterprise” was pitched as the “gravest of all sins”. And didn’t America’s “royal” whip masters’ milk that cow?

So, in reality, the closest the mainstream comes to embracing true communist philology is extremely infrequently found in religions’ culture, such as Buddhism’s vocational priesthood, Islam’s alms for the poor and Christianity’s Christ consciousness (i.e. humanity is “one organ” – the eternal body of Christ). Governments (communist and other) do everything in their power to render all efforts to communalise man impotent. Pharisees have always wanted divided societies within tight cultures, educated criminals controlled by austere “justice” mechanisms and strong departmentalised hierarchical infrastructure oversight (such as United Nations’ globalism). Constant wars between fake nations help keep the masses quiet, but the turmoil is also designed to manufacture continual societal divisions founded on “us versus them” lore. The “stranger” euphemises the other.

Going back to “the beginning”, Aristotle (a covert Pharisee) attempted to demean God through his conceptualisation of “unmoved movers” (or prime movers). These he bestowed with unlimited, but arbitrary creative powers.  In his obsessive zeal, he proposed the preposterous. According to his abominable legacy, the essence or will of God is so insular it is disconnected from (and symptomatically unaware of) physical reality. The blasphemy goes on to propose that everything in “the physical” is powered by uncaring, irresponsible being(s) that are perhaps quantitatively unaware of its direct manifestation.  Eternity is transformed into something timeless and infinite yet irrelevant but for the egotistical whims of detached insular creators. Would not like sentiment elegantly upgrade opinions of average-thinking modern-day atheist-agnostics?

Aristotle’s (possibly a contemporary of the first Gnostics as known) unmoved movers are described as “thought beings” (or constantly thinking vapour). Though biblical texts make no clear mention of it, thought beings are direct references to “archangels”. The most important archangel (specifically in relation Earth) was Lucifer. Instinct tells me the reason Isaiah presents him (along with “Ba’al”) in such a dim light is worship of him was the great threat to pharisaic autonomy over man.  Does the Morning Star and sun “competing” for daybreak presence offend revellers before Ra too? Contrary to popular understanding, thought is a form of light that travels symptomatically much faster than photons. It is colloquially well known that Lucifer (of all the archangels) had the original controlling mandate over Earth after “other attempts to configure abundant eternal life systems had all failed”. Gnosticism’s apparent “lack of accountability” seems to be a much better holistic appreciation of nature than the Roman-pharisaic “standards” approach. This impresses me that old druid orders followed Ba’al (the hierarchical instrument of Lucifer). Considering this more carefully, it should seem hardly surprising that Ba’al happens to be in conflicting completion (after En-ki’s conquest to “secure” the underworld flopped) with the Sephardim who remotely authored the Bible.

When Moses wrote the “Ten Commandments” he aimed to jump start religious standards in his favour. Whereas, at first glance, sentiment seems noble enough, upon stricter analysis, every commandment promotes notorious double standards that neither reflect whimsical human morality well nor promote divine being. Partnered with the Mosaic scourge, Aristotle’s control measures are still alive and well but buried so deep in cultural Roman Catholicism, they are almost unrecognisable now. Does not today’s International (“globalism”) Standards Organisation (ISO) certification attempt to impose arbitrary universal commerce measures that “transcend” (conflict with) staffing competence? Some would say that religions effectively plunder God’s divinity. Terms of surrender serve up grotesque contortions of the image of true faith.

Man may as well be God now is the unfortunate consequence

In support of that unlikely Sephardic-pharisaic cause, evidence (regurgitated timeless ideals) determines an ever-present external body crafts man’s divinity. Why would the ambitions of one greedy generation be celebrated and adopted by the next? Perhaps a little culture will stick, but generally speaking fashions change and when the young guns move into town they come with their own pioneering spirit. Clearly those that sought to and still do control man are not of this Earth (in the conventional sense). Uncompromisingly moralist directives over the ages all brandish the hallmarks of reptilian Sephardim. Measures (while observed) also absolutely fulfil the requirements of tamaras “in manifestation”.

Taking the presumption that the Sephardim are remote overlords of humanity, there is no concrete evidence supporting “time lord” status. Nevertheless, they may have some ability to influence the fate of groups or individuals. They may be able to intervene and change the tide (is that what is meant by the moon’s magnetism?) for and against those that affect or disaffect favoured progress. Time (as it is currently experienced) will certainly not remain constant after Ra’s transformation, when our planet shifts from Earth state to Tara. One symptomatic consequence I have predicted is that our carbon molecular status will “instantly” revert to silicon. From the astral perspective, silica is much more flexible and this should bestow us with the supplementary advantage of appearing to supersede nature (in terms of what is regarded as normal today).

Once we become “aware” of our miraculous transformations, we will have the power to execute all sorts of unnatural acts. The supernatural will transcend to become the “new natural”.  An atomic change of the ilk of a universal species shift from carbon to silicon would emphasise a collaboration of tamarian and tamaras. This proposes that both are not subject to effective management autonomy of any external entities choosing to bluster about malignant superiority. Recognition of concrete cycles and the tools to change and manipulate them is all that respective demagogic minions can capitalise on. The Sephardim, as I have highlighted, have used the False Matrix to great effect, but it is not sufficient for the suppression of man. Perhaps, in conjunction with the Pharisees they can meet their long term goals, but will the servant end up biting the hand of the master?

Though the implementation of this false matrix strategy has been as much about halting the ascension of man as anything else, I do still feel the Sephardim are more than a little excited by the prospect of seeing how we adapt to their world. We are their prodigal sons after all, so there must be some residue maternal feelings for us. On the other hand, too many of us have not adapted well to religious government control by their design. This will likely promote conflict and, perhaps, discontentment of ugly proportions. We will arrive largely blind to our new abilities; a terrain that is fully known and staked out by them. Their active resources are beyond our imagination, but if we are committed to contaminating, just as we contaminate everything in our domain, perhaps it will become clear why they have gone to so much trouble in their attempts to isolate us.

Mars, Gods and Martian Mercenaries

A Not So Brief Introduction

Weeks ago I began an outing that has expansively transformed to become my biggest web writing project of all time. Prior, circumstances had been rather negative. I had finally decided I had had enough of my living conditions and though, financially, my timing couldn’t be worse, my state of mind assumed “anything was better” than where I was. Fate fortuitously gave me a cordial break presenting the opportunity to “house sit”. Straight after the move either my creative energy had dried up or I was experiencing post-traumatic stress as one of the symptomatic hangovers from the other place. About three weeks ago the energy returned in full force and this article is the product of at least sixty hours condensed work thus far.

Other than the fact I seem to write more than anyone else on certain topics, what substantiates me from the dearth of other professional writers that expose similar stuff is I do not merely aimlessly parrot ancient esoteric texts or value added topical experiences in the presumption that no one is any the wiser. I am not one that authorises “belief for belief’s sake”. Cultural club members may see value in regurgitating traditional ignorance, but I, for one, like to prise open Pandora’s Box and dissect its contents. Throughout this discourse I constantly refer to “the record”. Those with clairsentient abilities use different methods to find different routes into the aether. There the perceptive will discover records of everything that ever was; an authority to be relied upon. Records are unblemished and in no particular order, so subjective minds are easily corrupted by material. That’s why I, personally, desperately seek rational and logical cross references for everything I discover. My job, if I have done it well, is to make that knowledge “real”. No easy task. What would be the general response to knowledge that posited the “Pleiadians of Atlantis” had no compassion towards enemies and our cerebral cortex is not the genetic key to human spiritual conscience?

Last post I wrote another piece on Ken Bakeman. A section about NASA’s staged moon and Mars landings somehow found a neat ledge within topical content. The Mars heist, of course, is an ongoing expose bolstered by an unmanned and aptly named, rover “Curiosity”. Whether set up as deliberate props aimed at stirring wilful imaginations or genuine “errors” resulting from sloppy operational management, numbers of shadowy humanoid figures have been picked up from time to time by that roaming ever Seeing Eye. In true Hebrew spirit, I determine distinct NASA moon and Mars footage was undoubtedly Earth made; each slide decoys devoted only to deceiving the masses. Nevertheless, there is a genuine extraordinary history begging to be explored should cameras ever be allowed to venture forth into erstwhile forbidden zones.

“The moon” as a topic would amply justify an entire article in its own right, given correct consideration, so I may revisit that one down the track at some point. Mars has such a deep history it, from a civilisation perspective, is far more account worthy than Earth is. That said, and as bizarre as it might sound, Earth possibly doesn’t exist in the formal sense so it should be no wonder our civilisation history is sporadic at best. If I dared revisit episodes back from the very dawn of time when Earth “wasn’t” but in its place a planet called Tiamat coupled with Mercury (while other heavenly bodies gestated) to exclusively share our very lonely solar system, civilisation might need to be “reappraised” somewhat. Then there was a sun (note: I originally wrote that there were two suns the, but Tiamat may have “become” the second one, which burnt out about two hundred million years ago) for two planets only and Tiamat was somewhere in the range of three and four times the metric volume of Earth. Understandably life systems worked very differently then. But as is always, the perilous course of those devoted to outright control ensured technological advancements snowballed corresponding with divides between inter-species factions. Procrastination and wars were the logical next steps. For the pathologically determined, the winning edge always becomes the ultimate objective regardless of moral probity. From that utopian perspective, absolute power is the ability to wield unrelenting total destruction. Humans can possibly paralyse a country, but those ancient demagogues sought to destroy planets. Tiamat’s outright demolition was one such consequence.

A new timeline was anchored to support Earth, created out of some of Tiamat’s debris (note: the Venus breakaway still exists in the old timeline), but the solar system would not compare with today’s modelling. For instance, a very small moon like planet called Maldek took an orbital path between Earth, Mars and Jupiter. All planetary positions were not as they are today. Incidentally, Tiamat was in no way the extra planet that appears on celebrated ancient Sumerian stone tablets. That was Maldek, of course. Another misnomer worth clearing up is Isaiah’s mention of a similar named celestial body in his biblical verses.  Marduk is not contextually related to Maldek in any way. Here is the best succinct explanation. Prior to the twenty thousand years intergalactic war (circa 120-102,000BC), Earth supported three moons. One was an intense miniature projectile which, according to Vedic accounts, revolved our planet each nine days, was very bright and came so close to us at one point [of its orbital cycle] it almost connected. That is the body Isaiah called Marduk and it is significant only because it brought about the end of Atlantis.

Returning to my pre-Earth historic account, the “culprits” for the destructive attack on Tiamat suffered a significant genetic downgrade geared to limiting powers. On that subject, our science, as always, is reduced to measuring, analysing and “theorising over” symptoms, so the mainstream has no understanding of what motivates changes to DNA. These could be deciphered with correct analysis of the atomic (or quantum) layer. I provide some useful feedback on the subject in my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”. In a sense to destroy a planet or sun (celestial star) is to blind God as both are sub-space vents (planets are termed “encased stars” in my book). Unbeknown to our science, God, ultimately, enables or disables DNA via the quantum membrane. Therefore renegades that cause serious cosmic mischief risk losing all their potential, eternally.

Even so it transpired that God did not punish the Tiamat wrong doers severely enough for karma struck Maldek with a predictable fatal blow (suggesting time is not “rigged” by the way, but that’s separate lengthy discussion). It does not take a flawed imagination to compute that to destroy a planet is quite simple given the correct knowhow and tools. Should I risk revealing the secret? The powerful ones created an obverse chain reaction by collapsing the central energy source [of Maldek]. This had the effect of generating unprecedented outward directed forces which would have appeared as “an explosion” to unbiased onlookers. Shattered debris must have scattered in all directions at speeds beyond rational comprehension. In Maldek’s case this was to impact Earth and Mars significantly, but I shall discuss more detail in a chronological historic review. Outcomes from the resulting implosion (of Maldek) were such that I did not believe Mars could be inhabited afterwards for some time, but I will go into the reasons later.

Another Great Heist, Mars and NASA

I would like to expand on my opinion that NASA evidence of moon cine footage and all photo stills generated by the Mars rover were (or are currently) created at Earth surface locations. It was an opinion, as mentioned earlier, that nested a foothold in the last post here dedicated to Ken Bakeman. Specifically focusing on the “Mars” rover now, my prior suggestion that the “set” is a barren Antarctica location is dubiously doubtful. Further research has yielded no ice free evidence of worthy comparison and the notion that mundane scientists have inadvertently accessed unencumbered inner realms that were once the dazzling grounds of the legendary Rainbow City would be the best kept secret of all time, if true. Photographic resolutions of stills created by the Mars rover are poor enough to ensure all key details remain unclear (at best) but good enough to pick up any general locational anomalies. Several desert dwelling (Earth) creatures, including reptiles and ground squirrels, have been snapped by the propaganda machine and this most favours a local Rocky Mountains reference point.

Though I haven’t been paying a great amount of attention to what’s been happening, in my limited research, other than that “mysterious” doughnut shaped “perambulating” rock, “Mars” rover has unearthed no alien artefacts at all. Wilful imaginations have inspired numerous commentaries on random boulder shapes that might signify something (but actually don’t). The trend was started by Barak Obama’s school chum, lawyer, Andrew Basiago, whose childish “book” conjectured numerous invalid fossilised hybrids of “household creatures” strewn here and there. What he wrote isn’t a far stretch from current stylised sentiment and the perceptive will have hopefully noticed I featured a slide of a Mars shoe “anomaly” last article (anticipating comments).

Depicted was a rock (originally presented as evidence by a British national newspaper, “The Express”) that straightforwardly looked like a shoe and the reason it made its mass Media “scoop” is the corporate press is being used to promulgate NASA’s indirect propaganda campaign. Richard C Hoagland (an ex. NASA departmental director) spent years “priming opinions” prior to the “launch”; a fantasy that expanded as a theoretical quest to discover and bust into a giant (ninety miles squared) “encased city” whose Ali Baba treasures would surely put the Atlanteans to shame. But, of course, as with all things fantasy, there was no actual plan for the rover to visit on its slow weary wind towards its pointless unforeseen target destination. Like the numerous pyramids, that “mountain” face picked up in the 1970’s and those strange “grooved” canals, Hoagland’s enticing “encased city” was guaranteed off limits as NASA was only interested in reviewing crap.

Having the ability to read energy signatures gives me a distinct advantage over other would be investigators that look at matters such as these. Everything that lives generates auras comprising layered signals that collectively consolidate all active and historic associated genetic data. These threads connect to timelines and, therefore, via supplementary routes it is possible to drill into any aspect of any one of these pristine metaphysical “records”. If a rock had once lived and was the fossilised evidence of a life form its auric memory is preserved eternally. There are some limiters, of course. For instance, we do not have the technique or technical knowhow to upload a mind’s product to a designated location whereby it might be inspected and “verified”. Neither do we have the ability to network minds if you will. Thus, external records housed in auric fields are currently locked and exclusively subject to the integrity of those that claim they have the ability to discern them. Any feedback would be an undeniable venture of faith for listeners, although aspects of that faith might afford opportunities to put feedback “to the test”, so discoveries are likely to be partially verifiable, at the very least.

Residue information from auric fields is not limited to that which is or was living. However, the connections and style of inanimate originated records are very different to ones stored as organic signatures even though, thinking practically; it is likely the whole thing is an aspect of quantum residual (or light). Suffice to say, inanimate objects can give vital clues about things that lived, clues that can be cross referenced and double checked against known (or presumed known) data. For instance, any [manual] work done on a rock will also detail the genetic path (of the craftsman/labourer) by the timeless energy signature. Even a bird that inadvertently sat on a rock will be captured by the signature. From this anyone with ability can instantly interpret an object’s history. I went through the verification analysis of that sensational “shoe on Mars” to find only a bulk standard ordinary rock which happened to look like footwear in its unfavourable lighting conditions. Not having witnessed a “beyond a shadow of a doubt” bona fide Mars originated auric field, it would be implausible to test the shoe rock’s location that way as frequencies might be almost identical to ones’ defining Earth localities and vice versa.

Unlike NASA, I see no point in sifting through mountains of crap knowing there is nothing [of value] to be seen. So I won’t labour the message. This (the Mars heist) is the best evidence I find that comparison with the Hebrew word “Nasa” (to deceive) is not coincidental. For those not moved by my earlier indirect propaganda accusation I say, why did mainstream television “innocently” select that controversial slide showing a distinctive and “shocking” crouching “reptilian” as the preview to the rover’s launch without plausible follow up? It was because they wanted to stoke fertile imaginations to stimulate open but never resolving gossip about “aliens”. Depending on what society is required to believe would determine whether debunking campaigns against all those tired stage props (including the crouching alien) would be launched or not, as the case may be. Occasional possible glitches, such as the doughnut rock, merely add to the “intrigue” as millions of synchronised sceptics’ chimes attempt to explain the anomalies away. However, there is a glaringly obvious operational flaw that exposes how the Mars operation has been staged and, upon explicit analysis; the many parts of this ruse are rather more complex than on “face value”.

That said, often concentrating on “the basics” will yield obvious rewards. Would not any serious investigator first question whether years’ worth of “Mars” footage could have been pre-shot to iron out or avoid unnecessary problems/complications? It is clear that was how NASA handled the “moon” operations. Why, oh why, would a cautious image-centric marketing program with “everything to lose” take the unprecedented risk of channelling a “live” Earth feed “via Mars”? We can see from the anomalies that potential mistakes have been made. The “team” has been sloppy in places. The obvious flaws with operational strategy can be found in two basic accounts. First and foremost, those erratic extended camera shutdowns/malfunctions undeniably confirm mitigated censorship. This has spontaneously encouraged numerous salacious gossip mongering internet TV channels to weigh into the (fictitious) debate.  As a consequence “a gazillion” possible conspiracies behind the shutdowns have been asserted with none, thus far, close to being reasonably correct. That is mainly because, in my opinion, all or the vast majority of internet TV commentators are part and parcel of NASA’s indirect propaganda campaign. I have yet to find one that doesn’t present as though he assumes Mars footage is being filmed “on Mars”, which, I have outlined, blatantly isn’t true.

The reason the Mars rover has to be “live” impacts the second flaw in calculated operational planning. Why the rover’s roaming camera has been periodically shut down and switched off at a moment’s notice is it travels in tandem. Accompanying the Curiosity’s every beat is some sort of overhead satellite. This is where it starts to become really intriguing. Not only is the satellite feeding genuine Mars surface footage back to Earth, but it’s live and the perspective has never been seen before “as presented”. Could that be a big old fraud too? It is unlikely because, if I understand details correctly, the satellite took the Curiosity rover to Mars. From memory, there was a gap between the satellite dropping the rover off on Mars and the surveillance machine firing up its all seeing eye. In other words, we are not entirely sure whether it was the Curiosity that was dropped off on Mars or, God forbid, NASA is running dual operations: one for the “scientists“ (or perhaps even the elites) and another simply  geared to confounding the plebs.

Anyway, either way, there is no verifiable correlation between the overhead and the surface image perspectives. Even so, one interesting thing I do note is the Marian terrain (was it presumed to be real) happens to be deep green as presented by the overhead camera. In light of the way our eyes process colour, I have always maintained that if Mars seemed “red” in the distance, it would actually appear dark green when viewed close up. This leads me to believe the Mars overhead photography hasn’t been embellished, as the logical move in pandering to popular ignorance would be to present Mars as a uniformly visually “red planet” (I suspect the Earth surface footage is run through filters to create the correlating ruddy effect). Another possibility is the green was too dark to alter sufficiently; too much work for such an insignificant payoff. Did the God of War triumphantly defeat NASA?

In a nutshell, what actually seems to be going on is this. Technicians must constantly guide the rover (they are driving it) on the turn of penny because Mars terrain is unknown until “team NASA” receives more information from its overhead satellite. Rover drivers must then roughly “map” the Earth terrain route as something that could plausibly be representative of the overhead footage real time. No mean task! Naturally, fairly ambiguous, nondescript terrain was selected for the Earth leg as too many large landmarks might give away the ruse. Very distinct topology (as seen from above) would be impossible to configure without lengthy strategic planning. Therefore camera “malfunctions” have pretty much been the only way to coordinate a response to those sections of overhead that by no stretch of the imagination could be matched against correlating terrains. In addition endless phantom internet commentaries have admirably assisted the deception program by adding to the confusion, transforming the “ambiguous” into intrigue. My selected YouTube presentation above gives a classic example of hysteria over nothing. In this one an arguably naïve announcer does manage to blurt out something about the ground not matching the overhead at precise point when the last camera glitch happened. Though the penny predictably doesn’t drop in the right way in the presentation, it was conclusively obvious that NASA could not recreate Mars on Earth for that part of the journey.

When Fraud Isn’t A Hoax

I think I have covered all that needs to be said in finishing off the work I began last article, my second Ken Bakeman expose. Well, perhaps the “nuclear issue” could use a separate address, but that will have to wait. My first piece featuring Ken was scripted a long while back. That one fulfilled another purpose by launching the less well known (amongst reptilian authority aficionados) Eva Draconis (who admits to having been inspired and influenced by him). Her work is just as original and deserving of credit in its own right in my opinion. Nevertheless, she also has a list of enemies and detractors, as was highlighted by a recent accusatory comment added below the article by someone that gave no evidence of their own identity. The accusation was startling, to say the least. Whoever it was stated that “Eva Draconis” is merely an alias of the Swedish psychic “fraudster”, Anita Ikonen. By way of background on this alleged fraud, in attempting to formally demonstrate her “x-ray vision” it was claimed Anita managed only to affirm her detractors by not being able to succinctly demonstrate her ability. Further investigation corroborated the allegation.

I treat all blog comments very seriously. Invariably those that make the effort do have something meaningful or worthy to say, but not all contribute anything topically potent or, indeed, relevant. Each governed by the poles cowardice and arrogance, individual humans tend to find safety in parroting selectively borrowed conformist sentiment (usually taken out of full context) that mimics momentary convictions. Even so, in my opinion, there is a direct correlation between level of expectant intrigue and potence of information discovered. To put that another way, if it sounds like it might be interesting it invariably is. My level of interest peaked on inspection of the comment in focus and that was a good early sign. Who was or is this Anita Ikonen and what possible connection could she have with Eva Draconis? Equally, why make such a claim if there was nothing to it? I have already confirmed there is an indisputable record of Anita failing to measure up to her claims, so that part of the message has been clarified. The rest needs additional work.

Assuming that Eva Draconis is an alias of Anita, this choice of name deserves further scrutiny. My mystery commenter espoused she was a pushy, arrogant woman who was not liked by her fellow university students. Her obsession with perfection was such; she made vicious attempts to remove the tenure from an associate professor that had innocently marked down her work. “Anita” is a variant of Anna and this means graceful leader, so these traits should be alien to her. Eva, on the other hand, became popular in Germany for a while. People named their female child after Hilter’s “wife”, Eva Braun. The charismatic dictator’s status has been made greater than royal after his death for no one can officially use Adolph (wolf) as a given name. He has been immortalised by this, such is Globalism’s (a generalisation of Zionism) respect for him. Draconis (the dragon) is a star constellation on from Ursula Minor. Ikonen is rather more interesting. This is the German-Finnish word for icons (of which a variant might be dynasts). That would explain Eva/Anita’s draconian attitude in class, if her double identity is correct.

There is more. Eva has laid claim she is “from one of the Balkan countries”. Correspondingly, her energy signature confirms that. In Fact it is so distinctive the pinpoint location is almost unmistakable (emphasis on almost here). My earlier presumption that Anita was a Swedish national may have been premature. There is more background to this. Back in May last year I published my most substantive article here to date. One of my big announcements was “Eva Draconis and I have irrevocably fallen out”. Key reasons can be partially revealed now. Given her supposed belief in the spiritual, she paradoxically functions like a materialist, a natural lateral sceptic. I confided my opinions on her origins and was met with a spontaneous typhoon of angry rejection. Her response was on the lines of, “Never have I lived at that [despicable] place, nor would I” (as an abrupt retort).

Knowledge that the energy field never lies did not calm her too much either, which I must say casts some doubt on her faith in general. Nevertheless, if she had been unfairly humiliated as a designate fraudster herself, the reaction would have been justified (to a fashion). Humans (particularly dragons) relish revenge and the transfer of hurt satisfies that scope. With hindsight her reaction certainly was plausible as I had likely made an error of judgement. When I mentioned the energy signature for the particular location as being “almost unmistakable”, I made the wrong emphasis. There are actually a number of very closely matched frequency signatures for her output. However, only two could actively verify a Balkans origins general locality.  I should have said “almost identical” in place of almost unmistakable, but that’s a trap this young player won’t fall into again. We know she is from a “Balkan country” by her own admission, unless she is not telling the truth.

Assuming that was so, why would she bother to lie about it? Therefore, I deduce, as, under the old Soviet “East Block” concept, Finland is classed as a “Balkan country”, that is the most likely choice of location “on face value”. Finnish nationals will sometimes signal very similar to the unmentionable place I had originally privately allotted as “Eva’s homeland”. On balance, given the schematics “as presented” Anita Ikonen must herald from Finland and so too does Eva Draconis. Additionally those familiar with Adwords, upon further investigation, will find Eva’s website is one of five owned by the same basic entity. Maybe she gave the others away to various friends, one being Anita Ikonen. Who knows? There is a “contact” button on each website. Perhaps someone will respond definitively to those that care.

It would be unfair of me to leave Anita “exposed” and vulnerable after work done demystifying Mars rover deception. To leave it at that would be an example of misleading journalism, in my opinion (i.e. Mars fraud = Eva/Anita fraud and “guilt by association”).  Therefore, before I soldier on with my tenebrous “eye popping” Martian history that explains why the Romans called Mars “God of War”, I need to put the record straight for Eva’s sake. Anita, we know, participated in and was caught out after video recorded testing by an organisation called the Independent Investigations Group (IIG). In this case review of the evidence (the video in question) may go some way towards clouding judgement and the issues, so I have decided not to review it. An army of ardent philosophers have adequately responded to the test; some whimsically for Anita and others affirmatively against (i.e. why do we let these charlatans get away with this sort of thing? Shouldn’t “they” be jailed?). This peer reflection adds little to my cause either, so I won’t be referencing any opinions, however “valid”.

The truth is often found in unseemly places, but I think, in this case, correct assessment will plausibly entertain the wilful rational mind. The first thing that needs to be identified is clairsentients draw on sensory resources not commonly available. By that I mean psychic abilities are a comparatively uncommon trait of humans in general but, in addition, senses used are normally unavailable (or unknown to) those that do not recognise psychic powers.  They (these ambivalent senses) are also in no way fixed resources. They come and they go. As such, they are very different to the standard sensory ranges: sight, hearing, smell, taste and touch which are automatically activated by those with functional receptors. Individuals with fully functional five senses can elect to desensitise to some degree, but for each new moment of experience, fully tuned experiential auto reaction is unavoidable (i.e. you cannot will “not hearing” an exploded bomb).  For all other so-called “sixth” senses, the reverse is the case. For instance, if no concerted effort is made, a clairsentient will usually pick up nothing in particular or, rather, won’t find her desired experiential target. Proscribed “reality” separates that which must be experienced (by those with applicable faculties) from potence relying on all essential connection to nonlinearity.

Psychics tune into other dimensional resonances abridged by the sub or super conscious. Because the “laws” that govern reality are very different in these domains, converting “tuning” to 3D can be an art in itself. If the body is even slightly imbalanced, translation can be disastrous. Thinking of my specific quest to exonerate Anita Ikonen, anyone facing their individual, high pressure, “moment of truth” is bound to become flustered (a form on imbalance) and that is why so many clairvoyants spectacularly fail to pass stupid materialism-aligned sceptics’ “tests”. In Anita Ikonen’s case, doubtlessly the sheer pressure of being “put on the spot” had a big enough impact to accentuate failure, blocking those supernatural clairvoyant receptors usually open. Brain freeze is a trait of our reptilian nature, authorised by the limbic system.

I have always said those prepared to look outside our mundane dimensional reality better take faith damned seriously. That faith dictates there may be no guaranteed circumstances permitting public demonstration of one particular skill or another. Invariably, and though clairsentients may protest at their designated status as supernatural “puppets”, everything beyond this reality is strictly policed by forces also beyond our imaginations. That means, putting it bluntly, all psychics’ “public” performances are as much about satisfying their interests and political aspirations as meeting mundane down to earth objectives volunteered by each program. Maybe someone or something on the other side had it in for Anita Ikonen.

It would be interesting to know how many psychics pick anything up from prehistoric terror on Mars. Wounds from that dark past go so deep they are bound to have become entrenched in our DNA. I feel without doubt there is a natural history stretching back to the dawn of time awaiting discovery, perhaps supporting life systems that defy our science-programming as to what it is to live. I do point out in “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” our sciences merely ascertain and measure automated vital signs so, beyond that, we have no scientific idea what perpetuates life or whether it is limited to vital automation (an Ouroboros, we can confirm, is the arbitrary science-standard denoting “life”). The doughnut shaped rock, mentioned earlier, hinted at possibilities of sorts, but it turned out that ambiguous natural inorganic automate was one of the bi-products of “Mars” fakery and most likely “explainable” if full context was ever revealed.

Gods of War and Martian Mercenaries

I promised a review of a distant real history of Mars and see no reason why I cannot begin straight away. Here, any anomalies referred to will be authentically Martian. My treatise will aim to sufficiently explore the two most significant (in terms of impact on humanity) civilisation periods. Dozens of millions of years apart, they collectively provide great insight as to how that heritage has become (or, dare I say, morphed into) modern day human. Nevertheless, before discussing the first period, I am going to need to sketch a very simple skeleton chronology to put things in perspective. As such, my timeline begins not that long after “Big Bang” (relatively speaking). Please note Big Bang was the product of an all-consuming energetic clear out of a prior existence paradigm and not the “original creation” of manifestation.

Somewhere in the range of seven to nine billion years ago, when universes were in their infancies, malignant entities (the first “humanoids” so to speak) managed to pollute an entire galaxy in the Orion’s Belt region. This was the consequence and fallout of a giant war sponsored by what can only be described as “cultural arrogance”. “Humans” (as they were then) had not learned how to be meek and presumed their special powers preceded a God given right to impose totalitarian control over all things great and small. A giant planet, at least a hundred times the size of Earth, was shattered and the raw elements violently scattered. Parts these grouped and reformed ever so gradually to eventually become our solar system. God (“Prime Source”) punished the humanoids and removed many of their powers, but they had learnt nothing, going right up to today’s creed. Is not fundamentalist totalitarianism “at any cost” the automatic goal of our current politically astute?

Consequentially, as they had reduced powers, resistance pockets (of this downgraded DNA) had no choice but to seek refuge from the four corners of existence and, over billions of years, communities displaced and remained unknown to each other. Time is a great healer and, due to certain chains of events, there was a coming together which permitted the eventually repatriation of the wider group. Our (rebuilt) solar system was now ready for “harvesting” and our ancestors envisaged themselves as its natural beneficiaries. The main planet (now a few billion years ago) was Tiamat. All kinds of entities had also sought and found refuge there (long before the humanoids) and it was run by a version of (or precursor to) dragons who had an unmistakably earthy nature. Down to earth, meek masters were bound to antagonise the proud, arrogant humanoids. It would take dozen of pages to outline complete detail, but, suffice to say, predictably over time accrued niggles built up to a giant unending dispute between Tiamat’s owners (I’ll call them “mammalian dragons”) and the impudent ones. One thing led to another and as cycles of violence will only ever expand outwards, karmic déjà vu assured Tiamat’s infamous destruction.

Unsuitably downgraded once more, the recalcitrant humanoids returned to their prior homeland, the Orion’s Belt, as the region had somehow replenished itself sufficiently to support life again. Later an upgraded variety of dragon (presumably based on the earlier gene set) took up residence there too and this caused regional friction (more karmic déjà vu) but, by now, they knew the humanoids’ tricks and rapidly prepared contingency measures making fortifications against direct attack. There were a lot more of them than humanoids, so that equilibrium reached an uneasy “stalemate”. There was only one real option for human ambition: pioneer new galaxies and star systems to establish exclusive wholly owned territories. Thus, given their undesired impotence, the humanoids desperately sought real estate to exclusively colonise. Around a hundred million years ago they found the perfect nest site. That was Mars.

Karmic déjà vu continued administering irony.  Dragons had excavated and created settlements on an unknown planet right under the noses of the Humanoids.  This [planet] had been created out of the debris of old Tiamat and would eventually become known simply as “the Earth”. Suffice to say, the humanoids were blissfully unaware that their selected solar system was literally crawling with hated dragons. Indeed the dragons were there at the behest of higher, all-consuming “galactic” powers who were conducting an experiment that attempted to rectify past imbalances of war. This experiment, the dinosaur age, pioneered the concept of meat eating hunters, changing the balance of the meaning of life forever. There had been meat eaters before, but these were the result of accidental circumstances. Consumed by passion of battle, some warriors innocently ate their downed opponents. I think these practices were regarded (by their compatriots) similar to the way we “judge” acts of cannibalism.

Surface dwelling on planets give the advantage of interstellar connectivity. However, from the engineering perspective, living on a planet’s surface is something akin to deliberately residing on the outside (in the stinking heat) of a beautifully air conditioned house. External habitation makes no sense in normal circumstances. The reason most planets are inhabited internally is they are purposely designed for inner dwelling. As every [real] planet doubles as a star, not only are [internal] weather conditions perfectly non-volatile, but there is also a permanent light/heat source which assures living DNA is nurtured round the clock. So the fact that our solar system had (at least) two planets supporting exo-life systems must be extraordinarily rare; and perhaps cosmically unique. Of course, it is important to remember that Mars was not in the same orbital position as it is today (nor was the Earth too). In fact, according to my calculations, ancient Mars occupied an almost identical orbital path to today’s Earth (which should hardly surprise, given the “shunt” – discussed later).

Additionally, the planet’s exterior was miraculously supplied an almost perfect living environment with pretty much uniform temperatures, weather patterns and so on. Clothing was not at all necessary there. Thus, under those conditions, it should be no surprise that populations rapidly swelled. Over twenty million years figures built to something approaching fourteen billion people. However, it was not an even valued “utopian” society. Numerous different races and species included various slave class versions of Homo erectus (quite different in ancestry to the ones on Earth) encouraged cycles of exploitation of sorts, but nothing like the way industrious “capitalism” has infected our social strata’s here on Earth. There large community groups sought sanctity by inhabiting giant fortresses (often ominous looking with some that were even skull shaped) and this made Mars appear quite a wild, dangerous world (one worthy of the “God of War” badge, perhaps). There was also great attention to order and hierarchy, suggesting an enhanced reptilian nature of man. Given that Ciakar reptilians today are a branch of the same basic humanoid stock, modern day evangelists would be shocked by true manifest human “spirituality”.

It was around the time of the great population swells from multi-millions into the billions that the Martian leaders were pushed into sourcing new territories. This was not merely a humanitarian gesture, but one geared to conquest. They had the infrastructure, the people manpower. Why not expand it? Here Michio Kaku’s theory of civilisation classification (exploitative manipulation) is correct. He is correct mainly because humans inherit the mindsets of all their ancestral lineages. Throw in a little extra reptilian for good measure and humble oversight potentially morphs into industrial zeal. In light of the expansion program, perhaps Earth had slipped the attention of the Martians up to this point. Did guilt over Tiamat’s destruction have something to do with it? Or, perhaps, they weren’t expecting a replacement planet? Why would a planet miraculously resurrect as a phoenix from the ashes of chaos [particularly for them, decedents of the chaos makers]? Why indeed? Be that as it may, they were to eventually run into Earth about eighty or eighty one million years ago.

A very small landing party (no more than two hundred surveyors) took up residence. These stakeholders set up communications and regularly hooked up with home base on Mars. Though the planet [surface] was deemed unfit for habitation, there were vast resources that promised rewarding plunder and that is the main reason they stayed. Even with so few on Earth tied down to one tiny location, before too long they were bound to encounter dragons head on. Dragons have inbuilt all-consuming radar that lets them “know” when their territory has been breached by foreign invaders. So the inevitable did happen and when the dragons presented themselves, the Martians first tried to negotiate a formal “mutual” territory stake-holding. Dragons are not good at sharing that which they already own, thus when doomed negotiations inexorably failed; the Martians unwisely opted to dig in. Rapid quick fortifications were set up as the negotiation team stalled for time, but the dragons were ultimately far too strong on their home turf. They annihilated the over stayers without remorse.

Upon learning of the loss of their Earth team, the leaders on Mars reacted very bitterly to the news. Consequentially a mini “star wars” ensued. Though I wasn’t aware of any battle activity on Mars itself, it would go some way to explaining the modern evidence of Xenon 129 and other potential nuclear residue. In fact, over a period of hundreds of thousands or perhaps even millions of years altercations were restricted to aerial skirmishes only (according to the record). The contest naturally ebbed and flowed over the ages. Though the dragons were positioned to win (edged by what seemed an endless supply of ships), they were simply not hell bent on conquest so happily maintained the status quo. Perhaps there is something to the notion that Ba’al genetics enjoy feeding off the “energy of chaos”. It would need an explanation like that to justify the dragon’s stance, because the Martians, as it stood, were “sitting ducks” and easy prey waiting to be irrevocably killed off once and for all. I sense that most victories for the humanoids felt hollow. Things were not going to plan and, certainly towards the end, they were looking for a remedial “final solution” out of their perpetual ineffective chaos.

It is difficult to ascertain when the Martians discovered the dragon base on Maldek, which also doubled as a rest and recreation station, but it was towards the end of the feud. This was a place with a reputation for vice and all things illicit and that was everything the Martians weren’t. Interestingly, prior to the modern day World War Two nuclear attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they were also regarded as places of great vice and loose women by “Allied” authorities, so maybe that is another example of karmic déjà vu. The Martians, in their own way were very similar to today’s fundamental moralists and, although their gripes were different and no laws were recorded as such, wider Martian populations had stylised “rights from wrongs” indoctrinated into them from birth. This social programming assured “vice” was unconscionable. Therefore to the Martians, Maldek would have been no different to, say, “Satan’s coven” today (i.e. a place of “lugubrious sin”).

The planet was extremely craggy. Mountains were everywhere and this suited creatures or beings with wings. Consequentially, it is unlikely the Martians ever tried to inhabit the place after engaging on reconnaissance activity. The terrain would have been mostly “impenetrable”. Interestingly, I am assuming because of their laid back status “in recreation”; the dragons did not pick up the Martian breach into their territory (as they had done on Earth). This fortuitously turned out to be fatal as it is most likely the Martians had found a direct route in via the underbelly. As I have already pointed out, the bowels of a planet are its most vulnerable because, with the right tools and technical knowhow, it is possible to collapse an inner sun, bringing on instant doom. So an unencumbered route to the core is what they would have needed if their survey was to provide sufficient feasibility to destroy it.

At the time of the attack on [what was erroneously believed to be the dragon’s epicentre or headquarters] Maldek, the Martians had thirty or forty thousand people stationed on spaceships. Presumably they somehow managed to keep all these out of harm’s way, because, according to the record, everyone off planet survived without injury. The case was not so for the inhabitants of Maldek and Mars. Every single inhabitant perished, which included roughly fourteen billion Martians (if I included slave classes in the count). Not one survived. Naturally, many key people were stationed on ships, but far greater numbers of very important strategic leaders had also perished on Mars, such was the miscalculation of the attack. In fact everyone was literally entombed on the planet surface including the majority of the elites.

Maldek initially, remarkably, split in two before it imploded or that’s how it appeared visually to surface dwellers. I know this because I may have been one of those surface dwellers and I can also add, strangely, as I was there, my [presumed dragon] body felt as though I was something like a kangaroo. Notably I remember having disproportionally large legs which, aided by extraordinary power, were enough to launch myself in flight as if on a whim.  But they were not powerful enough to save me from the catastrophe and I have no memory beyond the Maldek breaking in two. The reacting forces were so theoretically violent; they would have reverberated to the edge of existence and back many times.

Rocks would have been catapulted at unimaginable speeds as the Earth was somehow shunted into Mars, which was spontaneously ricocheted out into its current position. Earth’s (roughly adopting Mars’ old orbital path as a consequence) surface was badly pelted but not entirely devastated. Many of the large dinosaurs appeared to have survived and possibly took millions of years to completely die out (my original interrogation of the record calculated period in excess of ten million years, but I now determine figure work was metaphorical which may have incorporated significant wholesale “DNA shifts” as postulated by Rosine Lallement and others, though I haven’t formally “deciphered” symbolism yet).

In addition, I originally formed the opinion (implied by the record) that there was so much emotional entanglement attached to the Mars surface disaster, it could not be inhabited again. Consecrated or hallowed ground is the specific energy signature I noted. But this judgement turned out to be incorrect and wrong as the perfection of existence relies on absolute recycling without post mortems. Karma suggests the meaning of existence is guided learning, in part. Subsequent to my original opinion (the record only reveals information as needed), I have learnt that the surface has been inhabited many times over successive periods, mostly sporadically, since the Maldek implosion. Some civilisations have been so different in structure to anything that might be remotely classed as “human” they are almost beyond comprehension; “insane” as it were. In light of this, for the time being there seems little point in covering any of these disparate regimes individually, suffice to say there were a lot of them and just about all petered out leaving little or no relevant inheritance.

Can Martians Find New Spots

Therefore, for the next historic period snapshot, I would like to jump to a “final” resettlement of Mars in the vicinity of four hundred thousand years ago. To aid clarity of thought, I shall present a little additional background as it is going to be beneficial. Returning to a different distant period over forty million years ago, Earth’s new “Pteroid” custodians had evolved out of our material reality band. These, incidentally, capitalised on the canine-mammalian aspect of the dragon’s overall identity (perhaps revealing attributes of the earlier model that governed Tiamat), though were not anything like modern day “mammals” per se.  In a race against time, before they evolved too far adrift of functional reality (i.e. fourth dimensional beings will still see the third “in range”), a final project beckoned as the precursor to persevere intelligent life (guardians).

On schedule, about five million years ago, a new “Earthling” [man] was created as the replacement for extinct Tyrannosaurus Rex (the prehistoric dinosaur age “intelligent life” form). Entities with reptilian heritage from all corners of the universe were presumably recruited (though the record has not confirmed this well) and pitched in, but, as delicate Martian (humanoid) DNA was used to significantly bind the creature, sequencing took well over a million years. The delicateness and refined intuition required for any kind of success in this project goes a long way to logically validating my (largely) theorised “cosmic recruitment drive”, considering the “Draco” have reputedly spectacularly failed at every attempt at reengineering a replacement for us. After the successful hybridisation, as with T-Rex, Ciakar “alter-egos” lived on and ruled the planet surface. Unfortunately the assisting reptilian factions brought forward many prior unresolved internal disputes (reflective of their nature) which, by two and a half million years ago, had fully erupted into a giant cosmic war over Earth. Two hundred thousand years later, after the trouble had more or less subsided, a group called “Lyrans” (felines) assumed control of Earth as a form of “alliance” with the Ciakars and acted as their de facto royal protectors.

Humanoid gene masters (descendants of those that had survived the destruction of Maldek) had returned to Orion’s Belt a long time before, but any subsequent involvement in Earth’s affairs was probably superficial or in support of some or other ruling destiny. It was as though Martians had been downgraded sufficiently to lose their intellectual bite (or “will for war”). Humanoids that looked human were not limited to “Martian races” by now. For instance, according to Apache legends, their ancestors had to fight for the right to live on the planet surface, bursting from the bowels of the Earth (to defeat the reptiles).

I believe tales actually refer to genetic ancestors of the indigenous Indians and, in fact, these identify as the great Lemurians (who laid the foundation stones of the Great Pyramid of Giza and whose physical resemblances can be deciphered from the Easter Island Moai statues). It is they that took control of the surface, consequentially banishing the Ciakars to (control) the underworld regions. Detail required for sufficient background as to the complex politics of the time is too great for the space available here but, suffice to say, Lemurians were likely hybridised from Pteroid, Martian and Zeta (Grey Being) DNA and that “combination” (even as part reptilian) finds standard ophidian character traits utterly repellent. It also made them (from the genetic perspective) hierarchically “senior” to Ciakars and (which one could say) pre-empted their alliance with the Anunaki (a level above Ba’al, creators of the new dragons), whose energy fields began sniffing around Earth at least one million years ago.

At this stage there was no animosity between the “watchers” (euphemism for Anunaki) and the Martians and I am not sure what role they (Martians) played (if any) in the war that ensued when the Ciakars were forced inside Earth. Clearly they did have some sort of lead as it was directly after this war (finishing around seven hundred and fifty thousand years ago) that formal Earth settlement was desired. Being too far adrift of our reality plane to solidify, It seems logical to me that the Anunaki used (or created an alliance with) the Martians to act as their material hosts to rule Earth. Such an alliance would be signified by the term “Archon” (physical Anunaki) or “Anunnaki” (after Zechariah Sitchin) which equally describe Anunaki “in bodies”. Historic Sumerian texts give some detail on the style of conquest ambitions, which included the imprisonment and execution of Inanna (Enki’s “granddaughter”), after a botched attempt at securing the underworld to make control Earth a single holistic unified alliance. From that point on, the surface was superficially sealed off from the inner domains per Anunaki instruction (access points only reopened after their violent exit and creation a new waterway that stretched from today’s northern Africa to what remains of the Black Sea circa 33,000BC), such was their bitter dissatisfaction.

The Martians reputation for prudishness has been discussed before and this notably shines through once more in descriptive tales of Enlil (one of Ba’al’s many forms), though sentiment is perhaps contradicted by an unmistakably earthy Enki (a different manifestation of Ba’al). However what is undeniably clear, in accordance with the Book of Enoch (casually referenced in Genesis), is the “God’s” behaved recklessly, lying with (a euphemism for copulation) Earth women who bore their offspring. Some produced foetuses so large (and powerful) they (according to Enoch) burst from their bellies. If there was no genetic match, functional offspring could not have been produced. As, according to Genesis, the sons of Gods became heroes of old, a genetic match can be causally ascertained. Nevertheless, these females were from a pre-human, pre-Neanderthal age, so what genetic mix can only be guessed.

The so-called Sumerian Kings List (from the Epic of Gilgamesh stone tablets) points to Martian proxy rule beginning anywhere from five to three hundred thousand years ago depending on “interpretation”. Whether undesired (by the Martian bodies) and unauthorised fornication was the reason for the rift with the Anunaki or something else, intuition tells me the surrogate (body occupation) relationship lasted about a hundred thousand years. There is a problem with this calculation. Assuming the first eight kings represented by the Sumerian Kings List are notarised correctly, it constitutes two hundred and forty one thousand two hundred years of Anunaki surrogate rule, which either means my intuition is off or the Anunaki found new bodies to “host”. Perhaps I can go some way to resolving the conundrum. Notably, the stark differences in Enlil and Enki’s character and their individual approaches/philosophies over life highlights the partnership with their prudish humanoid portals had forged a marked schism. Indeed, I believe at some point Enki “changed bodies”. That new preferred form looked something like a giant alligator. Other Ba’al adjuncts, such as Sassu-wunnu and Yaldaboath, are often described as “sea monsters”(Ea). Was that the new “generic” body used after the humanoids withdrew their support? Either way information ensconced in the Sumerian Kings List is problematical because circumstances defining the First Dynasty of Kish are too tantalising not to represent that dramatic Anunaki exit thirty five thousand years ago.

An old newspaper report, dating back the 1920’s or prior, long forgotten by the mainstream, is occasionally referred to by alternative Medias that sift spurious tales.  According to the text, somewhere beneath America’s vast Grand Canyon was discovered a very ancient Indian reserve that, if proven genuine, would have rewritten popular history. On the walls of a large general hall were painted numerous animal depictions (presumed “Indian” hunting targets). Included was a long extinct prehistoric mammoth-sized crocodile which happened to be very similar in appearance to Enki’s new form. In addition, there are rumours (once again, completely unsubstantiated), that sections of our moon’s surface have been casually set aside for the purpose of crafting a living genetic record out of common rock. Apparently, there lies all of Earth’s great genetic creations whose pristine detail can be admired by those with time to look on. Included in the record is the mammoth-size crocodile presumed hunted by ancient Indians which is “hewn out of a mountain”, or so says the mythology.

Dates I have used throughout this history are very rough and [when in the zone] could be “in error” by as much as ten per cent. Though the record has provided nothing that might help to ascertain the specific linear probity of this timeline, a combination of intuition and logic begs I make the sweeping assumption that the Martians evacuated to Mars “tout suite” directly after their altercation with the Anunaki about 400,000BC (or later, if I have miscalculated). “Forgiveness” in our sense of the word does not feature at all on the list of the Anunaki’s many traits. Therefore, the humanoids would have had every right to feel unsafe “in context”. At this time [when they joined Mars] it was civilised by the Lumerian peoples (who are the genetic basis for many of our Asiatic types). Lumerians were renowned as sorcerers and mystics. Their style was also quite different to the Ciakar’s disciplined “academic” approach to these crafts. Thus, as a people, they were truly prodigal in the strictest sense of the word. So when the [Atlantean] “keepers of knowledge” joined the mystics that relationship seemed to prophesise spell binding potential. Lumerians had no reputation for licentious behaviour as such so, as far as I can gather, could not offend pious humanoids and society coexisted harmonically. This needed to be so for “houses” or dwellings of the time had no doors or windows!

To the best of my knowledge, this was the only time the Martians had been able to successfully live in peace with their neighbours. It was also the time when the civilisations of Atlantis began, perhaps as a reflection of their spiritual rebirth. On Mars there were some fairly well trained, good mannered “ape like” beings that did all the heavy work willingly. What was noticeable was the overall lack of wild animals and birds. By our standards “strange” domesticated creatures and “humans” were all that occupied cleared areas. There were also vast, densely impenetrable undulating wooded plains, so perhaps the otherwise absent wildlife either opted for safe segregation or, more likely, there was some sort of special holographic technology used to pen them in to keep “trouble” out of harm’s way (a similar methodology is used to quarantine inner Earth today, in my opinion). In the civilised areas I do also recall [seeing] some juvenile Grey Beings that provided impish entertainment. (Bright pale green) bipedal lizard citizens were so docile and overfriendly, they were almost churlish and seemed more like pets than people.  Temperature, weather systems and living ambiance may have been perfect but, sadly, paradise is always lost. That discussion will have to wait as this essay has already surpassed double budget. I do give a few hints on chronological events leading to the end of Atlantis (both on Mars and Earth) in various prior articles, most expansively here. Suffice to say, given unrestricted ambition I could write a book [or three] covering the entire Atlantis heraldic evolution in isolation. Information, doubtlessly, would ridicule aggregated populist sentiment.

A “Full Stop” Is Only A Spot After All

On the subject of writing, I produced a comparatively short, “poorly written” (I explain why here) extraordinarily powerful volume titled “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” of course, which began simply as the introduction to a treatise and mighty tome titled “Dimensions, Demons & Deceptions” (an abbreviation of “Dimensions, Demon and Earthly Deceptions”). “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” is the only full [though incomplete] explanation (in terms of structured purpose) mapping fundamental dynamics against existence in existence. From the cosmic perspective, it is a gross over simplification, almost a mundane overview, but it is the best summary account of its type in written word. Over the ages thousands of strategically great individuals have challenged and ultimately failed to grasp the only [presumed] eternally unanswerable (generic) question, “what is the meaning of life?”

Therefore, by extension, without first deciphering life’s “meaning” how would it be possible to unlock the key to existence? The answer is obvious. Once the key to existence is unlocked, life’s true meaning radiates with immaculate clarity. I have achieved the supposedly impossible and done it, unlocked existence. Given this fact, has my book been championed by Oprah (or whomsoever’s replaced her), done the global TV chat circuit or been jointly “anointed” by the Pope and the Dalai Lama? Has it found an audience in the supposedly “great” academic institutions of the planet, coveted champions amongst the finest philosophic minds of our time or illegitimated challenges by some cowardly science sceptics’ inquisition? No. the “good news” has been met with consistent posthumous ignorance, gregarious insolence and pompous arrogance because people (whether they be prestigious scientists or lowly peasants) can neither formally tell truth from fiction nor do they want their routine denial exposed.

Popularised inconclusive theories morph into truths under current regime conditions. Evidence is only necessary as a provision that determines associated proof. Associated proof is quite literally used to launch any plausible theory (“within range”). Any old tat will do with one proviso. It must never, under any circumstances, ruffle institutional diktat. Thus “evidence” is actually nothing more than warranted limited suspicion and the modern day truth seeker (whether it is a scientist or a historian) seems obsessed in the quest to find apt, validating interpretive data that panders to institutional whims. The genus of all these proven theories is the evolution of a vicious circle of deceit, whether outcomes are inadvertently “correct” or not.

Palaeontology is one of many study areas that allows the convergence of science and history. Basis used supporting discoveries is often textbook “vicious circle deceit”. No one knows how old any rock is as dates all come about from collective opinions generated from sampling data. When sampling data is taken from a “complete picture”, there might be room for compatible interpretations. In the case of old rocks, there is no complete picture and sampling data has granted the license to, frankly, bullshit. Another problem is, to science, everything is linear (a facet of materialism), including the immaterial (that isn’t “classed as” anomalies). Consequentially all science-motivated theories (or, in other words, all theories) are distortions of the whole (compromising that which is perceived as linear but actually follows unconnected logical governance rules). The net result is scientific opinions change with the wind because reasoning is partisan, inflexible and culture driven. Each new piece of “evidence” contradicting (potentially destroying) old theories is either rejected outright (for implausibly daring to challenge authority) or forces a watershed.  Even so, “watersheds” invariably lead to rapidly discombobulated “new” theories equally flawed from conception acting as suitably unworthy replacements.

Astral records and other “God given” channels are pristine resources. They are flawless because the universe simply records what was in impeccable detail. Those with the gift of access and mitigated prodigy to interpret should effectively become the most important members of any sane society. What greater power is there than to have access to the whole truth and nothing but the truth? If society is to be considered “sane”, it must leverage faith (the opposite of control). Ours currently yens the insanity called “security” only. Befouled science is the product of this pathological populism. So matching this against me and my writings; it is no wonder “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” has hardly gained any recognition. Because faith absent humanity is that desperate for its “security” (not intuitively knowing truth from fiction), anyone running the gauntlet by presenting unfettered truth causes an unresolvable paradox. Science may be foul, but it is complicated enough to vilify slothful ignorance. The truth needs to be investigated to be truly believed and that offends dilatoriness (unwillingness to work).

Gauging sales of “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, any future writing project would be a guaranteed commercial disaster. Therefore, sadly, I have to conclude the only way such a project could ever happen is by way of a miracle or, more likely, with great commitment from the limited plausible interest in it. Either way the prospect is exciting as there are ten large volumes packed full of unknown information provisioned to be written, opening the door to a world of unlimited discovery. Thinking laterally, perhaps, given the right method of publicising, a wider target audience of specific commercial interest could be reached. Were that to be achieved it may well reduce any individual burdens required to kick start the enterprise. However, for that to happen, the project would need multitudes of friends or a sole, very worthy associate. Finance is always a trickly discussion, particularly when payback is likely to be limited or non-existent.

A consequence of the dilatoriness of man decries all monetary ambition too. Thus the only ones deemed worthy of investment are those minions of foul science or crass manipulators of “commerce”. Proverbially, science is [financially] blessed for absolving societal guilt over its “burden” (the need to be “secure” versus “our” slovenly lack of diligence). I refuse to empower calculating, rogue scientists, other aligned bureaucrats or entrepreneurial “profiteers”. Therefore, all ten volumes must yield $3,000,000 (or $300,000 a volume) or nothing. With no yield no project would ever begin. In correct circumstances, backed by ample publicity, reflected surveys might generate 10,000’s or as many as 100,000’s expressions of interest in the project’s forward venture. In that capacity each volume would likely be viewed as sectioned parts of some sort of spuriously entertaining but inexplicably important objet d’art. I don’t have the resources or knowhow to craft any meaningful campaign myself, but if I found a philanthropic stakeholder [the sole associate] that was aligned to the cause and had sufficient resources, well, then there might be a match made in heaven.

Ultimately, it must be said, without a miracle, the venture will be limited to a collective shambles coordinating numbers of limited investing philanthropists. And these would have to be philanthropists in the true sense of the word as there could be no desire or expectation for financial payback. Any expressions of interest from pre-paying shareholders expectant of capitalist windfalls would almost certainly be met with bitter disappointment. In a nutshell, according to my laborious calculations, based on the precedent set by “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”, share prices would need to be upwards of $3000 per book for “the numbers” to work. I have already said there is a simple alternative and, sadly, without commissioned investment no books will be forthcoming, secrets will be buried, truth lost and humans can plough on as they have been in blissful apathy.

That would be a shames as my celestial authorisation will have largely been in vain, but I cannot help the ignorance, insolence and arrogance of wilful unbelievers. The journey, thus far, for me, has been a massive leap of faith with little or no consideration from others, so reflective outcomes are a minor concern of mine. What happens is really down to those that care. If there are enough “with interest” in good heart, spirit and mind then the discovery tour stands a vocational chance, a hope in hell. I gave it my best shot, testing resolve without reward, with “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” and that experiment in faith and trust failed, dismally. I never make the same mistake twice. Others keep working at it, keep hope alive, but even passionate believers such as Eva Draconis eventually wane into oblivion. People that seek only belief-affirming sentiment wonder why the problems never cease, why the injustice never subsides. Those problems are deep rooted and only by looking at the larger history of genetic intrigue can any lateral truths can be gauged as to the fate of mankind. Our corporate takeover was forged on the back of apathy that now vents uncoordinated collective distortion. It is ironic that the only remedy shines so brightly it blinds those that might see.

Perhaps an exit in the style Ken Bakeman will prove unavoidable, but without will there is never a way. Therefore, considering other means to fund the project, I recently turned professional. Alasdair Larmour is one of the few that correctly identifies auras are divided into numerous purposeful fields (that reflect the seven heavenly states). A psychic’s route through the maze depends on “grade”, so no one individual produces identical results. The aura might best be compared to a hot flame, its outer essence being the brightest and most vital. That contains historic genetic information, not present as amino acids identified by cumbersome science but, rather, stored in atomic reserves surreally non-located in the quantum layer. Talking of amino acids, I tend to launch an existing, one of a kind, pragmatic analysis of the cancer and its causes on Ozzie Thinker under the auspices of “Coming Clean on Cancer”. That will be an eye-opener, when published.

Anyway, at the extremity of a human’s full genetic blueprint (emphasised as the auric field) is a span of links to just about every entity that has or will exist. For lack of a better explanation, I shall call this the “extra-terrestrial auric layer”. Those interested in a fuller explanation on this can refer to “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”.  Reading the extra-terrestrial auric layer is a feature of my wider ability that gives me access to the permanent unaltered historic record which stretches back to the dawn of time. Roughly translated, it means I can provide relatively (all things are complex, lest we forget) explicit details on anyone’s cosmic DNA heritage. Because of the connectivity of everyone’s heritage, “technically” I can find everything about anyone and anything and their associations any when. Mind you, specific quests can be like searching for needles in planet sized haystacks. Thus, consultations will have a lot of scope (already a few guinea pigs have expressed interest in my role as a [what is] “the point of everything”, “meaning of life” guru) and I plan to hold them via Skype or some other internet platform, though in the flesh presentations would be possible in Australia. There is also the possibility of running “group events”. Those genuinely interested in more details may contact me by e-mail (quick2learn.steve@yymail.com).

Over time I have collected a good number of critics and, though criticisms have mostly been superficial, I enjoy stepping up to the challenge of providing coherent, educated responses even when I am clearly “in error”. Willingness to accept responsibility for the incorrectness of one’s own work separates great scholars from mediocre ones. In this vein, I regularly adjust my “opinions” (which are intended to be as close to representative truth as I am able to muster). Recently I scripted a short article about the developmental relationship between Pteroids and man on another website of mine. Texts concluded that human beings are, in principle, part reptilian, part canine and part spiritual being. That highlighted a contradiction. For a long time I believed our canine was evidence of mammalian qualities. This is clearly incorrect. In fact “reptilians” are mammals “of a fashion”. My plan is to expand content with a much more detailed response here. Who knows what I will discover. Even while writing this piece, an enormous amount of information has been channelled to me and I now have much better idea as to how “physicality” correlates with “character”. Suffice to say, I need to keep what I have learnt “on ice” until the next vocational opportunity.

Finally, returning to the Mars rover saga, “Curiosity” did find something that surely conclusively confirms its hoax status. A magnificent statue, the unmistakable bust of a “humanoid prince” (as is supposed) was discovered languishing in wasteland. Surrounded by nothing other than course dusty rocks was a mirage that might have been the splitting image of outgoing President Obama. Of all coincidences! Of all the people on Earth to be immortalised by that awful, cheesy NASA spoof paraded as “science”. Who better to be displayed than the great spinner of cheese and the one that had “final say” on authorisation of Curiosity’s deceitful, bogus mission? Before, little Barak Obama and Andrew Basiago, schoolchildren hand in hand, had reputedly ventured to Mars by Hawaiian Stargate under instruction of “Project Pegasus” (a CIA operation). So as a “pioneer” perhaps he believed he had earned the right to phony privilege.

Information on Project Pegasus was the sum of shadowy press mythology and an unconvincing, “atrociously written” book by “teamer” Basiago. I don’t recall ever seeing the mainstream running with any feeds (and “Google” comes up blank) on this. If spurious reports are to be believed, the children were drafted as slaves on consignment to begin work at a reptilian run colony located at their overgrown inner sanctum. The atmosphere was so different to Earth’s it was potentially fatally noxious, but children were said to be able to adapt better. Consistent with this information, rumour had it that over a hundred thousand adults had succumbed in only a very few years. Even allowing for ad lib sensationalism and deliberate misinformation, I suspect there is more to this story than meets the eye, given repulsive Dick Cheney’s alleged honorary title “Mars Tsar”, so perhaps I will focus on the detail, sift for pertinence and gradually uncover loose truths one rainy day in the future.

Earlier, I talked of mimicking Ken Bakeman. My timing could not be any less paradoxical. Within minutes of considering pulling out of the business entirely, as if willed on by forces of good, Ken connected with me. The result is I cannot merely confirm he is alive and well. He is full of vim too and no doubt has fantastic future ideas for those patient fans that never forsook him, didn’t believe him “gone”. At this stage I have been told to “keep silent”, but I can reveal his favourite punctuation mark is the full stop.

The Satanism, Materialism, Atheism Connection

Over the ages, misinformation and disinformation has fused to obscure truth to such a degree it has allowed a fiction simply identified as “Satan” to pop into existence. But for maligned belief systems, this “existence” would vanish as though it had never been. (Cosmic) Hebrew phonetics translates Satan as meaning adversary. However Israelite philosophy is so aggregated, students are never quite sure what is meant by contextual good or evil. For instance, biblical proverbs can offer absolute opposite resolves to identical situations. One verse might prophesise you must love all foreign nationals (goyim) as brothers, when others insist invaders only warrant abject hatred. Phonetically Satan is the combination of “sat” and “an”. In fact readers will be shocked that this is a merger of “truthful purity” and the “highest God” (An) from Sanskrit; a lofty language that stems from Atlantis.

So, given that insight, it is odd the Hebrews recognised the highest God of truthful purity as their adversary. Taking the numerous contradictions brazenly paraded in holy texts into consideration, outsiders must legitimately accuse Judaism and its Mosaic agents (orthodox Christianity and Islam) of duplicity here. That is the only valid conclusion, although it must be stressed that the Israelite religion was a version of the earlier Zoroastrian faith. Zoroastrianism tried to explain Anunaki influence using the metaphors “good and “evil”. Even so, the Pharisees commitment to the de-spiritualisation of God to impose obedience by rote on their slaves is no better paraphrased than by the “Christian” eternal damnation concept. To be precise, orders are given by St Paul (a Pharisee cloaked as “Christian”) in 2 Thessalonians Chapter 1 Verse 9:

“These will pay the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his power”

By this authoritarian definition; evil is everything and anything that detracts “what we [the “authority”] say” is good. The “glory of his power” is a convenient presumption that gives any designated proxy-agent the undeniable right to posit any sentiment “in the name of the lord”. Whether sentiment is noble or vile makes no difference, for that is the “glory of his power”. It is no wonder “Satan” has been given such a bum rap by the Jews and their affiliates. God needed a nemesis to counterfeit “good” and “evil”. Capitalising on ignorance, necessary Holy Scripture crafted dubious versions of Satan and Lucifer to establish the duality meme.

My book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” explains what is meant by the corruption of Satan (divinity of God). It is, for my research, the only source on the planet that presents truth plainly. Metaphors in gnostic texts, such as the Dead Sea Scrolls, are so subtle they are very hard to decipher (for those lacking tuned insight). Given all other reference points (in common circulation) more or less adopt the pharisaic distortion of enlightenment, even the most distinguished minds end up succumbing to blasphemy in some way. Suffice to say, the few that have read my hallowed news have invariably preferred not to understand, such is the contradiction against the power of proscribed bogus “order”.

Though I don’t specifically argue the case (in my book), there is unquestionable logic in my summary explanation which simply states “Satan was the very first star [to bless the cosmos]”. If, as I reveal later, stars are portals allowing God to exude expressive intent along the dimensional planes (collectively known as astral records), and were the objectives of the first star “pure”, then, given that Sanskrit definition, Satan would indeed be manifest God (expanded as An-nun-aki). Annunaki, I have outlined before, is the combination and summary of “everything as one”. We are all individually parts (units) of the (same) Annunaki.

Initially, while Satan radiated purity, our cosmos consisted only of light and “beings” (which approximated forms of jellyfish apparitions). There were no planets. There was no physicality. God per se “in essence” (correctly described by the Gnostics) is and was the combination or fusion of male and female. Prior to formatting existence, the male aspect was merely content with eternal slumber. Synonymous with wisdom, the female, colloquially known as Sophia, contradicted the male and became impatient. Eternal slumber did not validate holistic fulfilment so Sophia, in earnest accountability, conspired with the Holy Spirit with the purpose of fragmenting reality. A bi-product of male and female, acting as their cerebral identity, the Holy Spirit had been brought into non-existence to adjudicate eternal compliance, given the polarity of standalone maternal/paternal desires.

Complying with the wishes (request) of Sofia, the Holy Spirit determined that reality could not work as an aggregate (i.e. corporeal combination of male and female) model. Therefore Sophia, consumed with zealous idealism, intentionally created an existence exclusively for the female aspect on the presumption that the male would be content to slumber eternally. This was the grave error of creation and the one that has caused the stigma incorrectly associated with “Satan”. When God (the whole) woke up the war between ideological practicality and evolutional pragmatism began. At first a trickle of absolute blackness shaded the heavens that once were light. Before long an avalanche of intent overwhelmed Satan until the divine portal was eventually consumed by darkness.

The ancient Celts had a word for this. “Nun” (a component of Annunaki) means “primordial (or creative) waters”. From Sophia’s perspective, nun encapsulated evil and that is why it is supposed evil heralded from darkness and not through cause of comparatively shallow Zoroastrian propaganda (adapted by the Israelites into the Kabbalah). In essence, from this perspective, evil is everything associated with “3D” object reality which, according to atheist materialists, is theoretically purely dark matter (the “fundamental” version of the evil contesting Sophia’s zeal). There are doubtless numerous other analogies to be found in alternative doctrines, but I think the message is already sufficient enough to be understood.

Ancient Romans philosophised that stars are prisms made from quartz (after Aristotle) and this view was continued by their Catholic Church. Going against “science”, they could not be more correct for all [real] planets are encased stars (discussed in my book “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”). Innocents would be baffled by just how much unadulterated fantasy has been dogmatised as doctrine by credentialed scientists. If they suppose reflective babble might in some way substitute as “evidence” verifying how the cosmos works, academia has shown itself to be rotten to the core. Could Cartesian interpretation of Newton’s calculations presupposing gravity be so wrong, forces are the precise opposite of the theoretical models? Would not the effect of an item being pushed to the ground (by forces unseen) be identical to one being pulled? Suffice to say, our unshakable laws of gravity would be shown to be outrageously incorrect if they were truly understood and we were free of institutionalised propaganda.

Because I have detached myself from puerile and unconstructive popular theories that, if nothing else, do decidedly demonstrate complexity for complexity’s sake can and will baffle, lesser minds caught in the materialists’ web of intrigue will likely find content in my book “heavy going”; if not relative gibberish. Standard interpretations of Newton’s data models only do well at highlighting the insular view of man; his appreciative ignorance. For our current interpretation of gravity, as wrong as it is, the cosmos is further marginalised. Earth bound materialist psychotic infatuation over empiricism responds with “laws” that are expanded ever outwards. Parsing false reasoning, if it doesn’t “work” on Earth, then it cannot be “representative” of the cosmos or vice versa.

However, that said, the Earth is indeed a variation of cosmic processes or [albeit] a product of the vast universe, of course. Thus, logically, scientists need to understand the cosmos and its universe first to gauge “whys” and wherefores” of effects on (or in) Earth. Once dynamics are understood, it becomes obvious that stars are structural prisms, partially highlighted by gemstones manufactured by volcanos. Popularised by the late astronaut Edgar Mitchell (I’m led to believe), Zero Point Field(s) mark the origins of all access routes for that which is behind “space” (sometimes referred to as sub-space). In Victorian times and prior this was called the (a)ether (as evidenced by Teslas “lost” calculations devoted to generating free energy). Intriguingly, the word “(a)ethereal” shows an etymological path to spiritual. Perhaps that is why JP Morgan’s bank famously funded Edison’s material electricity. Before too long this will become obsolete anyway, as secrets concerning cold fusion will be available to every household.

It is worth noting that my earlier explanation for the darkening of the Satan Star lacked a punch line. According to NASA (surprisingly), a deadweight “black hole” (the combined “mass” of millions of stars) is located somewhere nearby (relatively speaking) the Milky Way Galaxy. That, though they do not confirm it, is the Black Sun (which was the Satan Star). It also arguably substitutes the “spigot” analogy the Mayan’s (Lemurians) used to represent a giant torsion field that propels galaxies. As Earth is relatively close to the centre we are not subject to too much momentous inertia and I wonder if we could survive the full effect experienced in the outer reaches of the universe. The Black Sun label intrigues me because [ironically] our sun is charcoal coloured too. It only “looks” bright as an effect of our atmosphere.  Buzz Aldrin reputedly reported thus (under his breath) in utter shock when breaking free of Earth’s atmosphere on the way to the moon.

All planets generate their own torsion fields (partially accounting for gravitation effects and that is why to exit our atmosphere summons an Olympian feat) but the intense pressure of (a)ether bursting into space generates forces of comparatively unimaginable precipitation. Consequentially, when dark matter is added to the mix, chain-reaction implosions generate such highly compressed (much denser than our purest diamonds) crystals, box-shaped doorways rise out of each molten soup. Though stars are not actually hot (heat is an effect of atmospheric combustion) dynamics are unaltered. If a man was to stand on our sun (which is dark in appearance outside our atmosphere, of course) he would literally burn coldly or combust in his atmospheric containment. I am not entirely convinced that a body could not survive or even “not live” unclad in space (but that logic is too afar adrift of competent discussion). Nevertheless, was that to be put to the test, it would take a brave person indeed to act as guinea pig. Space has extraordinary life giving properties and I wonder whether a body’s direct exposure might endure a miraculous morphing.

My reference to black holes earlier does not comply with traditionalism (although it should be stressed neither does Stephen Hawkins own variations, which are loosely described as grey holes by him these days). That is because science interprets the “phases” of a star wrongly. For instance, from truth’s novel perspective, in fact the so-called “white dwarf” phase actually shows light being “throttled” by dark matter. Not enough to fully extinguish the light, so to compensate the lack of overall brilliance, luminance is super-condensed. Even when fully “closed”, the star still radiates, so it is only visually black. Science talks of “black” representing an absence of colour (spectral light). This is incorrect too. There are green-blacks, red-blacks, purple-blacks and the swirling, pulsating abyss representing pure black is harder to look at than white light. So the description “black hole” implies much more than on casual face value.

Also, the term “hole” is rather misleading because the black hole isn’t any different to a normal star. All stars function as portals, or, to use the vernacular, wormholes. Mainstream science opinion is more or less the paradoxical reverse of truth. As with “gravity” real dynamics are roughly the opposite of causally evolved Newtonian-Cartesian thinking and designating black holes power colossal streams of energy and matter out into the universe. My earlier volcano analogy best represents processes. But there’s more. Pulses “belch” giant waves which capture foreign objects in their path. In the case of the Black Sun (which was the Satan Star) forces are so immense they drag entire groups of galaxies (at stupefying speeds). Even so, those that take the time to understand pulse synchronicity might be able to find a way through each force field “on merit”. Very small objects are able to forfeit this drag factor (and that’s why, comparatively, Earth bound meteorites that penetrate our force field are always tiny). In the mundane planetary sense, Earth is caught in one of the circular grooves rippling out from our sun. The reason it spins is not because of “gravity” (as I explain in my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded”) but, rather, forces generated by our internal sun source propel the body like a “dreidel” in its vain attempt to break free of the celestial groove.

I would go further and say this is where (if science was a true art form) theorists would find purpose in complication. The size and shape of a celestial object precisely determines how it will react to or whether it will be affected by the network of interconnected pulse waves that populate “space”. Where any three offset concentric rings meet, a triangular cosmic Venus Fly Trap awaits to ensnare unsuspecting asteroids which, possibly, are held in stasis for eternity. Planetary “rotation” mentioned earlier is also predictably subject to differing dynamics as not all bodies are spheres, as is supposed. In short, our universe is nothing like science imagined it would be like and that has caused the corruption of pragmatic thought in order to satisfy domineering practical ambitions.

Everyone should now contend that darkness, being absolute matter, correlated with the original description of evil. Dark matter was uninvited and unwelcome (or, perhaps, unanticipated is a better choice of word) because of the zeal of Sophia (womanhood that encapsulates wisdom). Ever since, certain factions have tried to divide the material domain spiritually to be consistent with her ideologies. Nevertheless, spirituality in its most unrefined form is simply knowledge of God (or Sat-an: would not Hebrew materialist-atheists call this the “adversary”?). Materialism bequeaths atheism, of course. The two are unbreakable partners in crime. An absence of God (who is brought to life by the spirited) proposes a more refined dark matter existence decontaminated from the wilful spiritual illusion. Satanism, contrary to popular ignorance, actually harmonised the standard (i.e. standalone dark matter) which highlights the error of Sophia. That consequence (our throttled Satan Star) is the eternal “war” between the wishes of matriarchal (Sophia) and patriarchal (Adam – the material “son”).

The modern cult of Satanism is more closely aligned to “Luciferian doctrine”, but that’s not all. In addition to the Black Sun being worshipped because it represents the success of material (male) power over (feminine) spirituality (light) is an underlying mission by Judaic Pharisees (Satanists in all but name) to reduce existence to abject materialism. Continuing with my history, Lucifer came much later and, as with Satan, “He” is an identity/concept that has been synthesised from an idealism that bears no relation to truth. Etymology of Lucifer points to Latin light (lux) bearer and ancient texts (such as biblical Isaiah) conceptualise origins from the perpetually falling Morning Star. In fact the real “Lucifer” had a phonetically unpronounceable name that approximates the hiss of the desert wind.  He was an archangel and may been [euphemised by] “fallen” Gabrielle.  To be clear, Archangels are “sound beings” (a higher version of light) or logos.

To his credit (and detriment too) Lucifer was the first to decide that Sophia’s objectives had failed and the universe was corrupt. Pleiadian knights went to horrific extremes to preserve what some dub “White light Order” (a derivative of Sophia’s spiritual essence). Invariably societies that welcomed sexual promiscuity and other vices were the targets of profound zealousness associated with perceived spiritual cleansing. Thus, I rather identify our modern ultra-orthodox whims as reflective of a much more ancient, timeless authority. Noxious militant groups, such as ISIS, demonstrate just how garbled the Pharisee’s contemplation has become. Religious materialism is a grotesque hybrid accommodating the very worst aspects of White Light Order. Our predecessors could and did destroy planets, ruin entire galaxies to “win”. Lucifer was the first to recognise that this morality was senseless. Therefore the “survival” model was created. I would like to say “as a replacement”, but that would not be true. “New order” overlapping “old order’s” contorted parenthesis has expanded only as hybrid psychosis. For instance, should human obsession be allowed to thrive, surely the universe awaits in own demise? If the powers behind ISIS and other vile, superficial militias could ransack galaxies, would they refrain from total annihilation for pity’s sake?

To Lucifer it was clear that living things enjoy conflict for conflict’s sake. Creatures were given defences, weapons or a combination of the two making sure survival was not a certainty for any individual species (DNA, ultimately always panders to the group). Those with the most weapons in some ways were at the greatest disadvantage as they needed to continually attack to survive. Also, ironically, nature assures the most aggressive alpha males (with the sickly) are usually the first to succumb to plague or disease (also highlighting DNA purges its extremities). Vegetarians were driven to greener pastures for aesthetic reasons or through necessity of avoiding conflict. Everything that existed in living form was prepared for war because war had predetermined functional existence under (prior) White Light Order. For example, the famous allegorical tale “St George and the Dragon” stretches back the best part of 80 million years remembering the destruction of [the planet] Maldek; a tyranny that ensured the slow demise of the dinosaurs (restricted to relocated Earth’s surface). Should it ever be published, I discuss the progressions that fomented the violent war in painstaking detail in my (second) book, “A New World Order”.

If Lucifer stood for anything in particular, it would be “balance”. Therefore, “survival of the fittest” is a misnomer. We humans revere mothers in particular. Fathers are seen more as a necessary accessory of procreation but when couples remain intact (usually via marriage), joint matriarchal/patriarchal supremacy is presupposed.  Yet, in practicality, childbirth is the only natural way of renewing human life. Whether procreation was mitigated or accidental, the outcome (when successful) does not alter. Thus, parents are (in some fashion) merely executors of the life generation process (well, as far as human beings are concerned). This means, dare I say, parents are not supreme.  New life guides can choose to be arrogant or humble. Sadly, just about all opt for arrogance (at least partially). Either way, the what-should-be insignificant procreation mechanism has been revered out of proportion. Parents are not blessed with “God status” for merely rearing offspring. Why do they presume it? Death, by comparable pharisaic-materialist edict, voided of spirit, is spurned. Children are processed as slaves by dim witted parents already imprisoned by their (the Pharisees) virtual reality.

I can go further and say God status is the ultimate objective of the self-sufficient Satanist/materialist/atheist alliance. Globalism harmonises the cult which adopts a Zionist (meaning fortress or gaol [the archaic word for “prison”]) attack force (evidenced by supplants such as ISIS). In particular, materialists have done anything and everything possible to reduce “the mind” to a mortal facet of existence. In a sense this is thematically pharisaic as well because the ancient Pharisees attempted to segregate spirituality or, rather, partition a voiceless “God” from “reality” (Law) which is instrumented by the blasphemy concept. That was but a small step away from fully-fledged atheism. Pharisee (the word) is a virulent version of anarchist (or adverse-order). It could be logically argued that “Satanism” is the antipathy of just order and insomuch orthodox pharisaic Judaic sects that “usurp” are comparably satanic.

There is also an uncanny numerological connection, which suggests that Globalist Zionism is the product of long standing adapted pharisaic doctrine popularised by Satanism now but actually stretches right back to prehistoric Babylonian times.  Interestingly, with the possible exception of inner realms, the Earth has been conquered by materialism. However, there is an effervescence that rises from “reality”. In relatively recent times hard evidence has materialised. What we call the “Worldwide Web” is a vibrating, pulsating, constantly changing manufacturer of synthetic (virtual) reality (very different to the perfect [truth] astral version). Globalism has a desperate stake in this revolutionary communication mechanism which has and will continue to radically alter humanity’s retrospective, our one “freedom”. The only way of (potentially) effectively censoring the internet is via the imposition of “world government”. Therefore, in that sense, liberty is lost when the Worldwide Web is no longer free.

Our individual guiding contracts with what can only be described as “the force that binds us all” risk being forsaken. “Parents” all agreed to their tenures well in advance.  All choices were clear and balance reflects choice. Therefore survival is generally synonymous with good decisions. Whether you attack or defend, survival rests on cunning. The most cunning are the best survivors. I have reflected on Sha’tara’s poignant comment (several articles ago) kindly relaying other worldly feedback on potentially “corrupt Anunaki Time Lords”. On one level the information did not make any sense at all, but now I understand [the perspective]. While the Satan Star was the exclusive portal for “white light”, manifest existence reflected that purity. Nevertheless when darkness was added to the “mix”, consequential changes in objective reality would have seemed like “a corruption” by those exclusively tuned to White Light Order. Earth then became the place where “God” (or source) is possibly most completely represented. The material world is the sum of a giant competition between all parts.

So “corrupt Time Lords” [per se] is rather unfair, given they were not privy to or (necessarily) wanted any part of White Light Order. It is clear to me, the impartial onlooker, that universal constrictions due to the rift between light and dark caused the perpetual ongoing war between pragmatism and practicality. Both sides were, are and will be at fault because neither is prepared to concede muted existence. That is why the only material “truths” permissible are ones of the correct practical flavours. Human infantile immorality is no better summarised than by the wholesale castigation of “child designates”. Did anyone think to check on the reasoning determining what it is to be a “child”? That lack of responsibility is liberally expanded in the total dereliction of dutiful support towards all group units. Yes, that’s right, in true civil society you would be obliged to support those in need. That world would owe everyone a living. Universal tyranny sets the tone for valiant oppression, naturally. Under the vague terms of atheist-materialism, to castigate someone unreasonably is reasonable.

In conclusion, it would be remiss of me not to discuss the most important sentence I have ever issued. If “God” had wanted to exist “in the flesh” he would have become an unrestricted being, capable of anything with unlimited potential. Therefore, as matter and spirituality are aspects of “anything”, if matter is “evil”, God is evil too. Everything labelled good along with everything labelled evil are parts of the exact same God. There is one simple term that encapsulates the ambitions of Satanists, materialist and atheists. “Accountancy” presupposes utopian order. Control agents can measure with precision, purge that which they deem is unnecessary or unwelcome. Accountancy is faith free. It assumes linear existence. It is devoid of spirituality. For the purists, the mind is but a figment of cerebral function; a mirage to be discombobulated by clairsentients. Per identical authority, childhood can be dictated. If those in power decide maturity begins and childhood ends precisely at the thirtieth year of individual life, then so be it. “Childhood innocence” denies the timeless, wilful mind and that demonic guide stone wholly supports popular deceit. That is why “childhood” is either “the powers” great strength or the Achilles’ heel that usurps the usurpers, but none dare contemplate it and that is why humanity is destined for absolute satanic authoritarianism.

What is Harmony?

Every now and again proclaimed clairvoyants boast of having met with famous historic personages. Whether characters are real or their fantasies, business is mostly the same. From the cosmic perspective (which is immeasurably displaced from human vanity), to be famous is not to be important. So why do the charlatans keep massaging their egos?

Personally knowing luminaries and the behind-the-scenes characters that cultivate prestige, I have come to realise the timeless relevance of fame is overblown and would be best attributed as a feature of human desperation to affirm predispositions validating the perception of importance. By this determination, action is far less worthy than accolade, or, to be seen to be doing invariably trumps the actual “doing”. There is a general superstition that assures connection infects. Logically, apropos, the more stars, luminaries and famous people in “frame” would immeasurably improve the reputation of any low light seeking “prosthetic” fame. Thus, per that reasoning, to be singled out and called on only by famous people empowers credibility creating a sort of sacred status for those in the spotlight. Why did all those famous people exclusively visit little me?

Like the three wise monkeys, the real stars invariably come and go unannounced, unseen and unheard. Demonstrative talent that is out of tune with a given age may collect dust covering hidden treasure for discovery at a distant, future period. But, even then, due to the hereditary parasitic narcissism of man, legacies are certain to be tarnished in some way. There is always some hangover as a response to the incongruous hatred of past conceited critics. Humans are at war with each other, constantly. The great group, surreptitiously organised by “the elites”, is attempting to create “one view” (which is labelled “Globalism”).

Per that vision, everyone is either “in tune” or “out of tune”. For Globalism to succeed, it needs in tune citizens. If the vision stands a chance at working, out of tune anarchists must be expunged (which can only mean eradication). In this case, citizens are law abiding, whereas anarchists are anti-establishment. Measures are dictated and usually facilitated though populist conventions. Other than the New Age smokescreen constructed by the United Nations, harmony is not a consideration. Therefore, Globalism must be and is symptomatic of reptilian authority. As there are no noticeable reptilians in plain sight, this covert operation can only be administered by hidden overlords.

Nevertheless, this particular blog entry is not going to be about fraudulent psychics or those ever present Draco reptilian cloaking tricks, though I may offer a few tips as I go. Here, the focus and inspiration has been music, the senses and how much we take for granted. For instance, as a concert trained classical pianist (my channel will be updated at some point), why wouldn’t I occasionally daydream what it would be like to meet with and hear the great Franz Liszt, Frederick Chopin or Ludwig Beethoven play their instruments and vocalise their unique crafts? Given the comparatively tiny populations of the time, why did the nineteenth century produce so many memorable artists, whose exhaustive compositions output is the legacy?

I happened to mention famous composers, which is not evidence of my own parasitic narcissism. There were a great number of lesser known romantic period composers that have left small, individual legacies. Yet, as much as I evaluate the alternatives, I keep coming back to the big three; Liszt, Chopin and Beethoven as the creators of particular genres which go beyond music. Undisputedly, the Spanish composers’ Albeniz, Granados, Russia’s Balakirev all had their own sounds, but for the German style there is either Liszt or Beethoven. Spanish, Russian, American, Italian mid-romantics still reproduced either Chopin or Liszt genres.

Some might argue that Schumann, whose lyricism is similar to Mendelssohn’s, is different. But I disagree. Even Liszt struggled to break free from the influence of Beethoven. Schubert and Brahms never did. Much lesser known composers of the ilk of Thalburg, Kalkbrenner, Fernz and Weber only ever produced Liszt, Chopin or Beethoven genre music. Educated readers will notice a paradox. Friedrich Kalkbrenner applied to tutor the child Chopin, who was certainly also influenced by John Field (attributed as inventing the nocturne before Chopin was born) and Johann Hummel. Weber and Kalkbrenner produced musical fusions of Chopin and Beethoven. Beethoven clearly referenced Muzio Clementi idioms, but the big three created the genres.

Without appreciation, music would have no value. Appreciative judgement would not be possible without senses. Because they cannot escape them, credentialed scientists have acknowledged sight, touch, hearing, smell and taste. Many others have gone unnoticed. Of course, clairvoyance is often jokingly labelled the sixth sense. If scientists took the joke seriously, they would be able to distinguish between clairvoyance, clairaudience and clairsentience. Other more rational senses impinge on Globalism’s grand vision for mankind. Discernment has no role in a world populated by biological automatons. That makes it a pretty interesting sense, because it demonstrates some have it and others simply, well, don’t. This, in turn, does not make good for uniform society. Could talent, God forbid, be the product of discernment?

In my book, “The Beauty of Existence Decoded” I go into detail. What is the difference between a sense and an experience? Are all experiences sensed? Before serious scientists consider these, existential building blocks, such as dimensions, densities and frequencies must be reviewed and understood, in depth. There are many conflicts of information when delving into realms that cannot be experienced directly. For instance, via extra-terrestrial channelled sources, some say there are but ten dimensions, others reveal figures in the hundreds and still more place no limit on possibility for dimensional states.

Right off, I dissolve the mathematical argument that holds theoretical straight lines, areas and objects are not aspects of the same perceptive illusion. “Object reality” is precisely that and all dimensions (from the mathematical perspective) are only associated with 3D. Variations come in other ways, such as colour, intensity, temperature, sound and so on. Wave forms, in raw state, do qualify as a separate dimension, but this [in many ways] is more flexible and complete than our own 3D. Should it be called 4D? Correlating with physics opinion, there is only 1D or 3D. “Flat realities” simply do not exist, except as features contained within the 3D environment.

Returning to the question, “what is harmony?” We know harmonics relate to pitch and harmonies are musical cadences. Harmony, therefore, is a sound vibration. This is important as there is an entire dimension created from what we call “audio waves” only. Included in this altered state are light variations at different frequency (pitch) levels if the comparison was to be made with Earth plane existence. In an earlier entry, I reflect on the ancient practice of communion. Back in Atlantean (from Atlantis) times, large groups of people synchronised music to channel massive energy resources from the centre of our planet. Why doesn’t much more than a trickle of the vast suppositories of molten lava supposedly contained in Earth’s core that geo-physicists babble about interrupt the calm lives of surface dwellers? The “Greek” Acropolis and other ancient sites are much, much older than people would imagine. Little be known, but these are the legacies of man’s negotiated connection with God.

Frequencies are very important. For instance, the Vedas claim [3D] creation is 0-20 hertz. Others associate certain pitches with magical healing properties. Ironically, I met with the aspiring energy healer, Leah Briers, this week and we fortuitously had a heated debate over senses, particularly in relation to vanity. Passion is an important part of negotiation. Flimsy, well-meaning positive affirmations invariably obscure truth in deference to goodwill. We pondered the question; do those that instinctively tune into fashions have a special sense? Vanity in the way of narcissism featured as my reasoned response. “Vain”, in that context, of course, is a dirty word and this is where discussions with Leah broke down.

I, correctly, emphasised that the appreciation of beauty was vanity and, as such, demonstrated narcissism in mankind. Yet she, though the word was not referenced, stressed the determination that aesthetics go way beyond the surface. As a complete expression, her point of view revered the intrinsic connections between the appreciated vision and all-inclusiveness. This could be anything but vain. Beauty is referenced “in position” against that which is not noticeably beautiful. It turned out that we were effectively debating the difference between ignorance and sensitivity. We, at last, agreed that ignorant beauty is everything shallow (perhaps dysfunctional given the lack of esteemed congruity) and intelligent aesthetics consumes functional depth (essence). She talked of her mission to integrate shadow (dark) and light. Undoubtedly, disciplined attention to her interpretation of aesthetics could achieve that.

Expressions of appreciation can turn into conflicts. Taste in music is an excellent example. If I was to occupy a room that had one of the great Beethoven Symphonies as background music and was joined by another person, we might react in very different ways to the listening experience. Assuming the symphony was well rehearsed and exquisitely performed, for me the listening pleasure would certainly be bliss whilst the other might endure “hell on toast”. Taste is not just simply divided by, shall we say, ignorance and intuition. Intuitive people are selective and I, personally, find much modern music (particularly the varieties that favour discords that don’t resolve) abhorrent. Others love it. Culture wars are most commonly fought over pictorial art. Numerous well versed spectral opinions are the legacy of sane judgement. People are different.

Communication boundaries make effective consideration of animals’ views impossible. There is no way I could relate to a dolphin, a pigeon or even a lowly chimpanzee (which, science tells me is almost a genetic cousin of man). Nevertheless, that does not alter the fact that I could sit in the presence of a wolfhound, for example, and hear nothing while it was tantalised by a special rhythmic gigue created outside my audible range. Perhaps I could train the dog to alert me when it expressed enjoyment, but, even then, how could I be absolutely sure my training methods weren’t flawed in some way or the dog wasn’t a versed liar (for rehearsed deceit, listen to just about any of our politicians)?

The other issue is, because I, personally, don’t hear it, does that mean there is no sound even though the dog acts as witness? This is something that goes beyond discernment, but it is a good example as it demonstrates the non-uniformity of nature. Lack of uniformity means I do not necessarily have to correlate with other human beings either. I can experience things no one else can, because I’m natural. Through fault of Globalist establishments rejecting pantheism as a consequence of the collapse of the Roman Empire (which was integrated into what has become the Vatican powerbase), United Nation’s hybrid New Age Catholicism is little more than a commerce planner for “Big Pharma” and other superficial population control mechanisms.

Are countries anything more than migrant brands? Constant displacement and reassignment may eventually create one race (a cacophony of hybrid genetics). The people are not adapting to the plan in the way the elitists want. Jewish microcosms within societies have largely set the standard. The repatriation regime has predominantly had the effect of splintering existing communities to such a degree there is no common voice, only multi-cultural mobs in constant conflict. The Jews, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists and so on want their specific brands of order otherwise never the twain shall meet, so mafia communities occasionally erupt either against “Order” or social competitors. Perhaps the most noteworthy example is how the Muslims have reacted to perceived threats after the [so-called] 911 event in America; hardly harmony?

Is not the burqa the most vehemently grotesque artefact of tyranny? God is found in nature, so if Mohammed’s modest dress command was to be obeyed, where practical, the absolute is an absence of clothing and not an aesthetic device purely designed to scandalise lust. It God was anti-fornication we would have been genetically modified long ago. The burqa is nothing more than a veil of censorship. It is no accident that Pharisaic fundamentalism adopts a similar practice. The self-proclaimed “apostle” Paul applies dogma with clarity. “For if a woman does not cover her head, it may as well be shaved free of hair. To avoid disgrace, she will comply” (my adapted translation of Corinthians 11:6). The Judaic orthodox counterparts aligned with the Pharisees offer large wigs in place of scarves as their means of censorship.

In fact, there is a great hint that God is not anti-lust as expressed in the biblical Old Testament book of Genesis. “Adam and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame” (2:25). Though the Adam & Eve passage is confusing as “Eve” is presumed to be “Adam’s wife” (which is not so), it categorically states that appropriate lust and nakedness is God’s will. Sentiment is reinforced per the “fall from grace” where God voices his displeasure at “man and woman” (not Adam and Eve) becoming ashamed by their nakedness. The tree of knowledge is blamed, as a routine gesture of pharisaic infiltration, but this actually symbolises something out of context. Eve, essence of humanity (as opposed to Adam, essence of ape man) possessed alien genetics not disposed to natural Earth. Human cannot survive on Earth naked, whereas Neanderthal (man) can. Humans are sensitive and man is not. Readers that have been attentive will discover outstanding though unsettling ramifications from this information.

The elite planners that created this modern mess have demonstrated an absence of sensitivity too. This leads me to question whether it is a sense. For instance, if we argue sensitivity is susceptibility, then adroit scepticism is the diametric. Scepticism, atheism, materialism and capitalism have collectivised to become evil partners as all elitist driven policies accentuate aspects of them.  Though no effort is spared in ridiculing transgressors, the New World Order is shown up over and over as a failure as a social model. It is shown up because it simply has not worked. Elite egos have been bruised as a consequence. So much so supremacists might favour the eradication of the human beast as an improvement on the current course. Will this encourage Armageddon?

Even the most insincere observer can surely rationalise the paradox: elite humans’ hell bent on destroying humanity, including themselves? It is not at all representative of higher powers either, if factions of the Draco are seriously considered as overlords. Pteroids simply would not bother with the subterfuge. It’s not their style. Ciakars do not only build empires, but have a long history of overt and covert control on (and in) Earth. The closest approximation of their character set can be found in the behaviour of cats. That is why their nocturnal version of Earth plane “humans” (these live in subterranean caverns) sound like felines. The Polished Knob video channel on YouTube offers a catalogue of numerous genuine original sightings. Language is strong in the selected clip but I do not hear the trademark Grey’s “call”. Other clips do present visual and audial evidence.

When the reptilians infiltrated and controlled Babylon, what did the people worship? Cats, of course!!! Earth kings of beasts on land are all varieties of cats, with two possible exceptions. Bears are low vibrational genetic cousins of Neanderthals (Pteroid “man”). Others from the Pteroid branch include the jackal-like White Draco and elephant nosed, floppy eared scouts. From the same gene-set, terrifying dogs represent their other supreme predators. Indeed ancient folklore promotes mythical dog headed humans (Cynocephali) which have either not been discovered or suppressed by modern science. Even in recent times, there have been claims of sightings of werewolves. Though no photographs exist for my research and most videos are easily rationally explained as incorrectly describing known phenomena, the stills from this (2015?) Brazilian CCTV footage are most intriguing

Yes, a little ritualistic Ciakar terror (they call fun), I can accept. Paedophile networks and masonic snuff rings may be so, but incidence would be too rare to interrupt our wider populations’ state of mediocrity. Assumed logic might dismiss these infeasible accounts, but that has not hindered zealous accusations to accrue and stockpile, creating clandestine pseudo-chronicles over time. Targeting easily excited feeble minds, many tales also find sanctity in the horror folklore genre designate. The serious side is very bitter with constant politically motivated attacks against Catholics and other strategic figures as routine propaganda. Unsurprisingly, no hard evidence has ever publically surfaced to validate any of these alleged scandalous malfeasant practices. It should be noted that hearsay has been a very effective tool in its use against political enemies. People have gone missing and others have made claims. Those claims alone have often acted as judge, juror and executioner with nothing to back them. It is almost as though the medieval inquisition is alive and well again.

Medieval chastity, chivalry, symbolism and even poetic philosophy are systematic of reptilian intervention on Earth. One of their own most potent emblems depicts the fleur de lys (usually in royal blue or scarlet) which means eternal life. Inquisitions are very much their style too. I have made some progress with Eva Draconis’ “The Orion Project – Real or Imaginary?” From her copious notes, it becomes apparent that reptilians (although most of the characters introduced deny being reptilian) have paradoxically split personalities. Call it instinct dictates they want to torture and kill any worthy chattel. Conscientious humility assures they must have permission from each victim. Not only that, but our fearsome tormenters regularly succumb to pity, particularly if victims are too willing and eager to be the sacrafice. If that isn’t sweet, I don’t know what is! Theirs is a society, it seems, literally divided between dominant masters and willing slaves. However, the differences compared to human order are considerable. Our slaves are not willing and never will be and that is why harmony is such an alien concept for human beings.